June 22, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:41
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I never admitted defeat. | ||
| We have a lot of things happening right now. | ||
| I think that that was an election that was, I don't think, all you have to do is read the newspapers and see what's coming out now. | ||
| No, I never, the word is concede. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have not conceded. | |
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| It's Tuesday, the 22nd of June, the year of our Lord, 2021. | ||
| I guess it's the first or second full day of summer. | ||
| We're here. | ||
| You're live now, significantly north of 60 million downloads on the podcast course distributed everywhere. | ||
| Massive news. | ||
| That's the President of the United States. | ||
| Really a great interview yesterday. | ||
| It was live at three o'clock with David Brody and Warder Cooler here on Real America's Voice. | ||
| Incredible. | ||
| And that's the many, many important Newsbreaking items came out of that. | ||
| I think the most significant was the fact of President Trump saying, hey, I'm not going to concede. | ||
| Why should I concede? | ||
| You've got so much going on here. | ||
| We're going to get into the voter fraud stuff later in the show. | ||
| Big headline and mediaite this morning, Rahim Ghassan, is that they're in shock. | ||
| Monmouth Poll shows one third of Americans, one third of Americans, One-third of Americans, not Republicans, two-thirds of Republicans, one-third of all Americans believe that Biden's only president because of massive voter fraud. | ||
| As we told you, that's the reverse of the drop in Biden's approvals. | ||
| And every day is going to continue as we pound through Georgia, we pound through Arizona, we're going to start pounding through Pennsylvania. | ||
| And what do we say? | ||
| Here's the theory of the case. | ||
| The theory of the case is continue to pound, show receipts, right? | ||
| Show what exactly happened on November 3rd, 3 November, and Biden's approval ratings will drop. | ||
| They'll get into the 40s. | ||
| You'll get a four handle in front of it. | ||
| And then eventually, you're going to get a three-handle in front of it, and there's not going to be Puerto Rico and Washington. | ||
| There's not going to be states. | ||
| You're not going to have 50 judges on the Supreme Court. | ||
| All the radical nature of all of this is going to stop, like the federalization of our elections is going to die today. | ||
| Not because of Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin. | ||
| There's 15 other Democratic senators hiding in back of them. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| It's an open secret in this town. | ||
| We can stop the program by focusing on 3 November. | ||
| We can stop the program by focusing on 3 November. | ||
| What do we say? | ||
| Get to the bottom of 3 November, get to the bottom of Wuhan Lab, and we've got massive news on that. | ||
| I'm going to turn to it in one second, but I also want to remind everybody, in Pennsylvania, Wolf, the governor, because of his handling of COVID, but also because of his handling of the voter fraud, his approval ratings now, guess what? | ||
| Magic number, 39%. | ||
| Good things happen. | ||
| When these radical Democrats' approval ratings drop to the mid to low 40s to the high 30s. | ||
| So we've got a lot of work to do. | ||
| We're going to be maniacally focused on it. | ||
| And the mainstream media is trying to bring up all the circus thing about, as we told you, the service in Italy is nonsense, the gun battle in Germany is nonsense. | ||
| I'm sorry if that hurts your feelings, but we're in the real world here of getting to the bottom of 3 November and what that means. | ||
| And like I said, the constitutional issues, the firestorm of the Constitution, that's all to come. | ||
| Do the day's work on the day it's appointed and that's what you've got to do. | ||
| We're going to have Peter Navarro here in a few minutes as co-host because I want to pivot now to really, on the other thing, get to the bottom of the Wuhan lab situation. | ||
| I'm so proud of my former editor-in-chief of Breitbart London that Nigel Farage says we would never have had Brexit if we did not have Breitbart London, and we wouldn't have had Breitbart London as the powerhouse it was if we did not have Raheem Kassam as the fire-breathing editor that really tore through British media to become a platform for the Brexit movement, for the sovereignty movement, and was really | ||
| Rose to power because of, guess what, the migrant crisis of 2015 when the globalists led by Angela Merkel opened the doors to Europe to let the migrants in from the Middle East for the situation in Syria fed through by Turkey and that changed the face of modern politics and began the rise of the populist movement and really the nationalist movement in Europe changed everything. | ||
| Rahim Hussain was the forefront of that. | ||
| He started National Pulse and he brought in a couple of young reporters in Really, and I've said this time and time again, I consider myself a pretty good judge of horse flesh, right, in this area. | ||
| And I said at the time, and this, I didn't know she was a sophomore at the University of Chicago, and this was her side hustle, right, her side gig, Natalie Winters. | ||
| Massive news yesterday, and ladies and gentlemen, this is how narratives are built, okay? | ||
| And this is how you fight back. | ||
| Peter Daszak got fired. | ||
| The headline, do we have the home screen from the Daily Mail yesterday? | ||
| Because the homepage screen asks, Daszak gets fired. | ||
| The denier, they fired the denier. | ||
| And they caught, the only reason all his lies and misrepresentations, remember Daszak's just the first, right? | ||
| But they served up to the gods of war. | ||
| They served up a human sacrifice. | ||
| Not going to be good enough. | ||
| But they served up, and the reason they served it up, is Natalie Winters and Raheem Kassam and the national polls and people. | ||
| I can't be prouder of you two. | ||
| Obviously we're not going to rest on our laurels. | ||
| We're going to talk about what we're doing going forward. | ||
| But first, walk us through how we got to a place that Peter Daszak, who was lionized by global media, lionized. | ||
| And by the way, Leslie Stahl, you should be ashamed of yourself. | ||
| You should come, Leslie Stahl, in 60 minutes. | ||
| You guys are a group of clowns and buffoons. | ||
| Leslie Stahl, the great Leslie Stahl, should come and you should follow Natalie Wynn is around for a day or two. | ||
| And your production staff, the 200 people you got on the staff over there, you should come around and follow her and actually sit there and learn something. | ||
| Learn what an investigative report is about. | ||
| That interview you gave with Dasik, and boy, we gotta play the next couple days, that was embarrassing. | ||
| You were like a junior high school kid, late with their term paper, that had to, you know, go ask a couple of stupid questions, kind of sit there and bat those eyes. | ||
| You're a buffoon. | ||
| You had a global stage to rip this guy's face off on just the facts. | ||
| You gave him a pass and actually perpetuated this, right? | ||
| Also the things these global corporate media's got to worry about, lawyer up. | ||
| The class action suits and the class action suit lawyers, they're beavering away right now. | ||
| The liabilities you guys have at CNN and MSNBC and the New York Times and all of this, CBS is going to be massive. | ||
| Not just the blood on your hands for suppressing this information, but, because I know that doesn't matter, you don't care about people, but, more importantly, the liabilities. | ||
| And it's all coming. | ||
| And people say, oh, Bannon, you're just crazy, just more talk. | ||
| Peter Daszak has been fired. | ||
| I want to turn now over to Raheem Kassam, Natalie Winters. | ||
| Guys, take it. | ||
| Well, the first thing I want to do is say, look at the date today. | ||
| It's a day before the five year anniversary. | ||
| Oh, tomorrow's the five year anniversary. | ||
| We have to have our special tomorrow. | ||
| Of June the 23rd, 2016, when we, you know, united with one voice, decided to leave the European Union. | ||
| And look at the trajectory of the world since then, and the fallout since that. | ||
| Obviously you had President Trump, and we heard from President Trump at the beginning of the show. | ||
| Really, what's more important is you've had this rise of... I mean, I'll call it what I really truly believe it is. | ||
| It's not just a bureaucratic class. | ||
| It's an evil class. | ||
| It's a class of people who don't believe that... What did we talk about yesterday? | ||
| When Fauci goes on that podcast, he says, I had to lie because people would have been buying up the mask. | ||
| It's this class of people who really don't understand Americans. | ||
| The expert class. | ||
| The managerial expert class. | ||
| They hate Americans. | ||
| They underestimate Americans. | ||
| It's the same people as sit in the European Union. | ||
| I wouldn't say it's just Americans. | ||
| They hate working class and middle class people. | ||
| They think they're the betters and you're just a bunch of drones. | ||
| But the Fauci's and the Dasheks of the world, despite Dashek coming from Wolverhampton or wherever he came from, these are the American equivalent of the European commissioners. | ||
| Right? | ||
| These are the people who think that the decisions need to be taken as far away as possible from the ordinary man, from the common man, from the working class man, from the family unit. | ||
| And look at the fallout we're seeing as a result. | ||
| Nathalie, you know, full credit to you for, you know, honing in on these people and seeing them for who they are and relentlessly going through, you know, we don't do opinionizing on this stuff. | ||
| It's all fact. | ||
| It's all matter of record. | ||
| How can, this is what, how, real quickly, in a minute or two, tell the audience, Rahim's the editor, but when he puts you on a topic, how do you get down, walk through what all the hours and hours, and this is for young people, want to come in and be rock stars, want to talk in front of the mic and get opinions, doesn't matter, nobody cares about what your opinion is, what they care about is the work. | ||
| Talk about the work. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How did you actually get to this? | |
| Well, I really think it's all about pattern recognition, and what I mean by that is there are these individuals, whether it's Peter Daszak, Anthony Fauci, Jeffrey Sachs, who have been in business with the Chinese Communist Party in various forms, whether it's taking research grants from them, whether it's serving as consultants for companies that are effectively state-owned enterprises and often arms of the Chinese Communist Party's People's Liberation Army. | ||
| Singling out Jeffrey Sachs there, who's a former consultant for Huawei. | ||
| But what's really interesting is that whether the news cycle is covering, you know, President Trump's trade war, the origins of COVID-19, anything, these people always seem to find a voice in the mainstream media, find a voice on Chinese Communist Party-run media outlets, and they're consistently peddling the narratives of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So it's really easy to discern Because even though the mainstream media presents them as these kind of neutral arbiters of fact, or as the Lancet and the World Health Organization would tell you, right, Peter Daszak certainly has no conflicts of interest. | ||
| Although, as of yesterday, we know that's no longer the case. | ||
| That's not true. | ||
| That's not the case. | ||
| And I think what Rahim said is so correct in that this global elite, whether it's, you know, epitomized by Anthony Fauci, Jeffrey Sachs, Peter Daszak, the reason why they defend the Chinese Communist Party so hard Especially now with the origins of COVID-19 is because they know that the economic model that they want, whether it's authoritarian state capitalism, it doesn't exist without a the Chinese Communist Party being in power. | ||
| But more importantly, the Lao Baijing, the hardworking people of China, if they don't have support or if they don't have the Chinese Communist Party over them condemning them to slave labor, that the economic model that Jeffrey Sachs and Anthony Fauci and these globalist elites have pushed for years won't happen and it can't happen. | ||
| I want to take one second here to say this. | ||
| We talk about empowerment in this show. | ||
| This show is about human agency, okay? | ||
| And that's for this audience. | ||
| You're now engaged at the committee level. | ||
| Your committee is force multipliers here, critical race theory, taking over school boards. | ||
| This show is to empower that, also in addition for young people out there. | ||
| A path to kind of recognition. | ||
| Natalie Winter, she spoke at the New Federal State last week. | ||
| She's being asked all over. | ||
| She's becoming a global figure. | ||
| Why? | ||
| The work. | ||
| Hours and hours of going through these documents. | ||
| Every young person out there. | ||
| Let me tell you a way that you're not going to get to your end goal. | ||
| Getting on there and being a pundit and talking smack. | ||
| It's all fine. | ||
| Sounds good. | ||
| It could be interesting. | ||
| But it's not really a path forward. | ||
| You have to do the work. | ||
| Natalie Winters shows if you do the work in highly disciplined and just grind and get those source documents, then tie it together. | ||
| Obviously, you've got to have a great editor to help you kind of think through the structure of it and say, hey, I think you're missing this. | ||
| I think you've got to do this. | ||
| This has got to be redone. | ||
| And by the way, there's tons of people coming to me. | ||
| I said, this article sucks. | ||
| It's not edited right. | ||
| It's too confusing. | ||
| It's too much. | ||
| The role of the editors here, and there are very few good ones in the conservative movement, very few good ones. | ||
| You've got to really have that. | ||
| But it's the work. | ||
| And every young person out there, you can do it. | ||
| You can get in these documents, but you've got to grind, and you've got to grind through it. | ||
| You've got to know the connections. | ||
| And I think that's one of the things, as we talk about DASIC today, this would not have gotten done If you had not done the work, the Washington Post, the K-File, the New York Times, Tom Hamburger, all of you people are beclowned. | ||
| You all have the apparatuses. | ||
| You all have the resources. | ||
| You all have the expertise. | ||
| And you didn't do the work. | ||
| You know why? | ||
| Because you knew if you did the work, where this may lead. | ||
| And that's why the fearless National Pulse did the work. | ||
| You know, on the podcast yesterday, we talk about the Elsevier, that's the publisher of Lancet. | ||
| How many employees does Elsevier have? | ||
| Oh, got to have 20,000. | ||
| So 3,100 employees at Elsevier, and its parent company has 33,000 employees, right? | ||
| And, you know, I realize not all of them are supposed to be reporters or journalists or correspondents, health correspondents, whatever, but in amongst all of the thousands that are there supposed to be doing that work, not one of them bothered to do it. | ||
| And it took it took Natalie Winters to go through the documents and lay it all out for them to finally have to recuse Peter Daszak from that from that role on the COVID-19 Commission. | ||
| So what I want to do when we come back, take a short commercial break. | ||
| Navarro is going to come in. | ||
| You know, he's got economic stuff, but we want to talk about this. | ||
| And I want to get to actually what happened. | ||
| And why it's so important, and where do we go from here? | ||
| Because this is the first of it. | ||
| Listen, the gods of war are not going to be appeased. | ||
| The human sacrifice that is Peter Daszak is not going to stop the relentless march to get to the bottom of what happened in Wuhan Lab. | ||
| Just like in Arizona, the new Concord Bridge. | ||
| We're not going to stop. | ||
| We're relentless, okay? | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Navarro, join the crew here in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We're going to have Mike Lindell on from the Religious Broadcasting Convention down. | ||
| I think it's in Dallas. | ||
| He's going to be on later in the show, in the second hour. | ||
| Remember, support the Freedom Fighters there. | ||
| Go get the toppers. | ||
| Topper's 30% off. | ||
| They kick in a couple of pillows. | ||
| It's a great special. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com, but you must type in promo code War Room. | ||
| Type in promo code War Room. | ||
| The topper's 30% off. | ||
| Total sleep system, 30% off. | ||
| There you get the mattress, the sheets. | ||
| And the pillows, but just go online, get in there today, look around, do your shopping at MyPillow.com, support the freedom apparatus. | ||
| Okay, and we're bringing in Navar here in a second, and this is because of, for this audience, the reason that you're having, that you're bending the arc of history is because of you, because you're force multipliers, etc. | ||
| What we try to do is get you ahead of the news, the signal, not the noise, but what's happening tomorrow. | ||
| Rahim Kassam called this, and I'll come back to you in a second for more details, about, you talked about, hey, this process is going to start, and the first thing they're going to do is start cutting these guys loose a little bit, then they're going to serve a couple up, okay? | ||
| Navarro called back in January, the whole thing about the stagflation, right? | ||
| And he's here today, another massive article coming up. | ||
| But the key thing you said last, Last segment, Natalie Winters, was pattern recognition. | ||
| This is what separates out the top from everybody else. | ||
| It's those people that can get into this data, connect dots, and see, I see a pattern, I see a pattern here, I see a pattern here, and then drive into the heart of it. | ||
| That's getting to the heart of what the problem is. | ||
| It's a problem we have. | ||
| And some of it in conservative media. | ||
| There's too many what I call chasing rabbits. | ||
| You're chasing rabbits, okay? | ||
| You're not getting to the heart of it. | ||
| The key to getting to the heart of it... | ||
| In process of how you get this information tied together is pattern recognition. | ||
| That separates out the superstars from the rest of the pack. | ||
| You've got that. | ||
| I'm going to start calling you Rain Man. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| I say that in the highest compliment. | ||
| Have you seen Rain Man? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| I feel like a boomer. | ||
| For people who always ask, like, how this operation works, that's what it is. | ||
| So, Nathalie does the micro-pattern recognition and I do the macro-pattern recognition, right? | ||
| That's seeing where things are going to move down the playing field. | ||
| And Nathalie is just, I think, an unparalleled talent in spotting, I mean, what we call the simulation, which is the same names appearing over and over again, in the same networks, the same times, you know, the same conferences. | ||
| And so that's how we do it. | ||
| It was amazing. | ||
| Okay, Peter, I want to bring you in as our first co-host, and then I got to turn it back to these guys. | ||
| You've been there from the beginning also in Wuhan. | ||
| Talk to me about Dasik. | ||
| The takedown. | ||
| First of all, my take on Natalie, she's our human neural network, if we're going to be clear about this, and that's the highest compliment I can give anybody. | ||
| Dasik, really important to understand what he got fired from. | ||
| He got fired from the UN Commission investigating the origins of the leak, and what he got fired for was behind-the-scenes orchestrating information, including a letter that went to Lancet, That basically discredited the lab leak theory. | ||
| So his hands are everywhere, and the Lancet itself, Granularity, at one point during the campaign for president, endorsed Biden, which had never been done in a prestigious economic journal, and they further discredited themselves by putting in an article on hydroxychloroquine that they had to retract. | ||
| The point is, with Dasik, this guy... | ||
| Hang on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on, hang on one second, hang on one second, hang on one second before we get to the Dasik thing. | ||
| In a hundred and forty... | ||
| Rahim, I think it's a hundred and forty-two years. | ||
| This is one of the most prestigious, not economics, it's medical, but it's a peer-reviewed journal. | ||
| This is considered the elite of the elite. | ||
| They came out and actually said in the editorial, in 142 years, we have never involved ourselves in a presidential election. | ||
| We're doing it now in this big editorial because Trump and his cohorts are a danger. | ||
| And now we find out in their retraction, and that's what it was, they proposed a lie. | ||
| Lancet, Board of Directors, individually. | ||
| Lawyer up, folks. | ||
| Lawyer up, folks. | ||
| Lawyer up. | ||
| Steve, Richard Horton is the guy, the editor, and a week after he endorsed Biden using that journal, that's when he came out with that big meta-study on hydroxychloroquine, which was a total sham, and it totally destroyed hydroxy as a viable therapy. | ||
| But Dasik, I spent the weekend looking at Dasik tapes, and at one point he described fruit facts As puppies. | ||
| His strategy, Steve, was very simple. | ||
| He thought, plain God, that if he went out and took a bunch of bat viruses, took the worst from all the bat viruses, put them together into a super virus that could kill humans, he could then develop a vaccine and life would be grand, right? | ||
| What he didn't take into account is two possibilities. | ||
| One is that the thing could escape from the lab And number two, the People's Liberation Army might actually release it from the lab to kill Americans. | ||
| One of those two things happen. | ||
| You decide. | ||
| But Dasik is one of the most evil people in the world. | ||
| He's still at the EcoHealth Alliance. | ||
| And if anybody in this world gives him a single penny for another grant to go out and kill people, they're crazy. | ||
| Forget that. | ||
| We're taking all the donors lawyer up. | ||
| We're going to take that apart brick by brick. | ||
| We're coming after all you guys. | ||
| All the donors that have perpetuated this Echo House Alliance, trust me, we're going to get to the bottom of all of it. | ||
| Lawyer up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tort is a four letter word. | |
| Let's talk about Google for a second because this was one of the other big stories that started to get a lot of traction yesterday, Natalie. | ||
| Yeah, so Peter Doshak and EcoHealth Alliance have, for over a decade, actually received funding from Google for various studies. | ||
| We have a story up on the National Pulse, maybe they'll be able to put that on the screen. | ||
| But starting, I believe, in 2009, Google had supported the work of EcoHealth Alliance with the principal investigators being none other than Peter Doshak. | ||
| And really interestingly, I believe it was in 2018, Google, along with, I believe it was the Rockefeller Foundation, actually funded a study analyzing the wildlife trade in China. | ||
| And I think that the buried lead from that report is that it kind of lays the groundwork for the whole natural origins theory, i.e. that COVID-19, SARS, really any infectious disease, could have emerged from a wet market that even says, quote, wet market in this report, several times, coming from China because of, whether it was climate change or these environmental practices that Peter Doshak loves to attack. | ||
| So I think that to juxtapose the narrative that we've seen come from the likes of Peter Doshak now and especially the narrative that big tech especially Google and Facebook and their subsidiaries YouTube have promoted really is in line with this 2018 paper. | ||
| I want to go quickly back to you laid out for the audience about four weeks ago what the process was going to be. | ||
| I want to make sure we're putting people ahead over the other side of the hill. | ||
| Walk through what you said that process is going to be. | ||
| What has happened to date and where you guys are going because you're the lead tank here. | ||
| And I think we're pretty much on timeline with what I would have what I suggested would happen. | ||
| It said, look, it will take a couple of weeks for people to from from back then when we were dropping Dasik story after Dasik story for people to catch up and realize what had gone on here. | ||
| The Lancet putting this. | ||
| Disclaimer on Daszak's page, on his profile page on their website, is an indicator not of an editor sitting there going, oh let's be honest with the public, but an army of lawyers sitting there going, we have to do some serious CYA on this. | ||
| There then follows a sacrifice, as you called it, and that sacrifice has come over the last 24 hours, in the form of the recusal of Daszak from the COVID-19 Commission, which the Lancet is heading, which is headed by Jeffrey Sachs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Woah. | |
| Now Jeffrey Sachs will be worried about his own position in all of this and we've started to report on his involvement here, but there are also other figures surrounding all of this that need to be scrutinized too. | ||
| The big one obviously in the public's mind here then is Dr. | ||
| Anthony Fauci, or as I like to call him now, Mr. Anthony Fauci. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do not believe that we should be calling him doctor at the moment. | |
| By the way, that's on the war room here of the nomenclature, Mr. Anthony Fauci. | ||
| I love that. | ||
| It is Mr. Anthony Fauci. | ||
| National Pulse podcast listeners heard that for the first time last night. | ||
| And Mr. Anthony Fauci goes up yesterday on the Sway podcast and starts to make all sorts of really, you know, old man shouts at cloud excuses surrounding what he's done. | ||
| Get off my lawn. | ||
| Oh, get off everything. | ||
| Go away. | ||
| Leave me alone. | ||
| Natalie, I think we also have further information that we're going to break today about some more things that he lied about on that podcast that we didn't even spot immediately. | ||
| Some people have been sending us some tips about some of the things he said that don't necessarily track with the truth, let's say. | ||
| We'll be exposing that later on today. | ||
| And then, so from here right now, where we stand, it's another Probably, if you ask me, put a gun to my head, it's probably another four to six weeks before we see firm action on Mr. Fauci himself. | ||
| But I think Mr. Fauci now knows that without that Dasher cover, he's in the spotlight. | ||
| Okay, Peter, we've got about a minute. | ||
| My 90-day clock is clicking, boys. | ||
| 90 days. | ||
| We're working. | ||
| You said 90 days about 30 days ago. | ||
| Walk through about Mr. Fauci. | ||
| So Dasik is the fall guy. | ||
| We call that shot, right? | ||
| So he's gone now for all practical purposes. | ||
| We are covering him. | ||
| But I think it's important to track back to Fauci on what Dasik actually did. | ||
| And it's actually Natalie's work that allows us to do that. | ||
| If you look at those emails that were uncovered from Fauci, you go back to the January 31st, 2020 email from Christian Anderson of Scripps, where Anderson clearly tells Fauci that this is probably a genetically engineered bioweapon. | ||
| It's an engineered virus. | ||
| And at that key juncture, Fauci decides not to tell the president, not to tell the White House, and instead to maintain the lie that this is something from nature. | ||
| Now what happens then is that Fauci probably directly or through Dossack gets Christian Anderson to put together a group of colleagues to write an article that appears in Nature magazine, which is essentially identical to the Lancet letter in debunking the lab leak theory. | ||
| So you got Fauci behind the scenes working through Dasik, going to the Lancet, You got Fauci behind the scenes working through Christian Anderson, going to Nature Magazine, pushing this... Hang on, hang on. | ||
| Quick break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're out. | |
| Quick break. | ||
| Come on back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Whether it's a bioweapon or a hoax, what we do know over the last year and a half, your immune system's everything. | ||
| You've got to boost it. | ||
| No government can do it. | ||
| No friends and family can do it. | ||
| Only you. | ||
| Go to warrimdefense.com today. | ||
| Get the free vitamin D3 in the zinc. | ||
| You've got to pay shipping and handling, but most importantly, get access to information about your immune system. | ||
| Remember, this whole show is about the work on oneself begins with oneself. | ||
| Take action. | ||
| Use your agency. | ||
| do it today. I want to go back to, Rahim, where do we go, and Peter jump in a second, I want to start with these guys. | ||
| Where do we go from here? I want to lay out the battle map for the war room cadre, the war room posse. Where does this go? Because remember, November 3rd and Wuhan are the first two lines of work We've got others that are starting, but we've got to get to the bottom of this. | ||
| Because you're seeing the whole globalist, managerial, elitist, expert class that the Party of Davos is predicated upon. | ||
| It's starting. | ||
| You're starting to see the cracks. | ||
| You're starting to see them turning on each other. | ||
| They're going to be throwing guys under the bus. | ||
| Where do we go from here? | ||
| Um, look, now you have a situation where Fauci is going to be scrambling to look after number one, and that's himself. | ||
| I think that's the first time he's really gone out and done a podcast yesterday that was just simply all about himself, right? | ||
| I mean, 100%. | ||
| He's reached 80, 90 before on certain different shows, but last night was the first- yesterday morning, sorry, was the first time he'd gone out there and his whole appearance was about himself. | ||
| Why are you calling me Hitler? | ||
| Look at my, you know, track record, all of this stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I find that's- He's in danger. | |
| Look at my track record. | ||
| It's one of the worst track records in human history. | ||
| But he also went to the number one podcast in Silicon Valley. | ||
| They all listened to it. | ||
| He's reaching out to the Zuckerberg saying, I need help. | ||
| Well, that, my friend, is a tell. | ||
| Who is he signaling to that he needs cover at this point in time? | ||
| And where does he think he's going to land after he has to get out of this job of his currently? | ||
| Now, I do want to take a step back on all of this and say, well, How did we get to this position in the first place? | ||
| We let Zuckerberg off, I think. | ||
| As much as we talk about him, we let him off. | ||
| Because remember, at the same time that he was funneling money through CTCL to predominantly Democrat districts to pump up Democrat voters, he was at the same time offering, in Fauci's words, quote, money and resources to a government official. | ||
| You know, back in the old days, that was called bribery. | ||
| You know, you want something from a government official, and you want to exchange money for it? | ||
| No, no, no, no. | ||
| That's not how that works. | ||
| You want to give money to a certain thing, you go through official channels and you do official... You don't email Fouchier and go, hey, you need some money, brother? | ||
| That's not the way that works. | ||
| And so I think we let Zuckerberg off. | ||
| Um, because he's kind of, you know, he's a joke out there, right? | ||
| He's a meme. | ||
| Oh, he's an alien, he looks kind of weird. | ||
| But let's get real about this. | ||
| Right now, at this point in time, ladies and gentlemen, I assure you, Mark Zuckerberg is a greater threat to this republic than George Soros. | ||
| Reorient that in your mind. | ||
| Reorient that in your mind. | ||
| Because Mark Zuckerberg is the forefront of all of the, um, You know, the retardations of American systems that took place last year. | ||
| The willful attempt to careen the country off course was founded in Mark Zuckerberg's head. | ||
| And so the point of Fauci appearing on that thing yesterday on a big tech podcast with a person, by the way, and we drilled into this on our podcast last night, a person, an interviewer, what's her name, Swisher? | ||
| Kara Swisher? | ||
| Kara Swisher. | ||
| Who's interviewed Zuckerberg a number of times and calls him Mark. | ||
| And then you had Fauci going on there, Mr. Fauci going on there, calling him Mark. | ||
| These are all people on first name terms with one another. | ||
| I mean, imagine that I was commenting on someone in politics, you know, the Gates scandal. | ||
| I was like, well, of course, Matt, you know, Matt does. | ||
| There is no difference between these people. | ||
| There is no wall between these people. | ||
| It's a fraud that one can, like, interview another. | ||
| And this is where we need to start focusing on. | ||
| The network is really Let me have a teaching moment here. | ||
| This is why we're not conspiracy theory. | ||
| You guys don't believe in conspiracy. | ||
| This is the way the system works. | ||
| What you have to do is deconstruct the system and see the systemic nature of this interrelationships and interconnectivity. | ||
| That's the pattern recognition. | ||
| Once you see that, you can break it apart. | ||
| And that's when they start to freak out. | ||
| That's when they start to spin. | ||
| That's when they start to lie more. | ||
| And that's when they start to turn on each other. | ||
| Because remember, they have no courage. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They have no courage, because they control the higher ground of all this, and they're used to just mocking and ridiculing and, you know, Seth Meyer and Stephen Colbert. | ||
| That's what was so shocking about the Jon Stewart thing the other day. | ||
| When Jon Stewart sat there and told the Emperor he had no clothes and used humor to mock him, Colbert, if you remember Colbert, didn't know how to respond. | ||
| He did not know how to respond. | ||
| He threw back some snarky stuff. | ||
| Oh, you must work for Senator Johnson's staff, etc. | ||
| I want to make sure we don't burn total data here because I've got to get through in this segment. | ||
| I'll bring in Navarro. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Okay, here's what I want to do for you. | ||
| You've laid this out beautifully. | ||
| You've asked how this is going to go forward and end. | ||
| It starts with the cover-up. | ||
| It starts with the January 31st email to Tony Fauci that the virus was engineered in a lab. | ||
| Christian Anderson sent him that email. | ||
| You and I know, Steve, if you and I knew at the time that that thing came from the lab, certainly Fauci not only knew that it came from the lab, But he had paid for it and his gain-of-function experiments that he authorized had created that Frankenstein monster, okay? | ||
| So it's the cover-up that goes from there. | ||
| Fauci had a responsibility to the American people and to the American president at that point to become clean, and as the Defense Production Act coordinator, I could have done a lot of different things than to save hundreds of thousands of people's lives if I knew then what I know now. | ||
| So the cover-up's going to get Fauci. | ||
| And so here's what Fauci did. | ||
| He goes through Christian Anderson to denounce the lab leak theory through Nature magazine. | ||
| One thing, right? | ||
| He goes through Dasik, and he comes around and gets the Lancet to denounce the Lab League Theory. | ||
| And the third part of the cover-up is Facebook and Zuckerberg, where he gets Facebook basically to censor any content that calls into question The issue of where it came from. | ||
| And so, that's how we're going to get Tony Fauci. | ||
| He's ultimately guilty for killing over three and a half million people worldwide if that thing came from the lab, which we know it did. | ||
| He's guilty of that. | ||
| He's guilty of killing over half a million Americans if that thing came from the lab, and you know we did. | ||
| But the way we ultimately catch him It's through these three strands and the cover-up because he had an obligation to tell us. | ||
| Natalie's going to get him. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Well, the fire Fauci crowd should be very fired up today, because as strong as Peter Daszak is tied to the Chinese Communist Party, he's also tied to Anthony Fauci. | ||
| And I don't just say that because Anthony Fauci has spoken alongside Peter Daszak on several panels in 2016 alone, and really kind of been around the EcoHealth Alliance orbit. | ||
| But I also say that because one of the reasons that Peter Daszak has so many conflicts of interest is because he was getting Six-figure grants from Anthony Fauci's NIAID. | ||
| In the words of Peter Daszak, he admits these 16,000 bat samples that are now missing, or I guess have been disappeared, from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, he admits that those were collected with quote, taxpayer dollars. | ||
| So, Anthony Fauci, I think, might be the next person to be recused from some sort of body, but I also think that it's very important that the War Room audience Not rest and not just take this victory with Peter Daszak because I'll tell you, the World Health Organization has added again. | ||
| They recently announced what's called the One Health High Level Expert Panel, which is as scary as it sounds. | ||
| It's basically the new pandemic advisory board they want to craft. | ||
| global health policy, whether it's to combat climate change, pandemics, or really any threat. | ||
| And interestingly enough, the people that they've placed on this about 26 person panel, of course, you have two Chinese Communist Party officials, including George Gao, who was a back channel with Anthony Fauci. You also have Marion Koopmans, who people might remember that she was a former advisor to a Chinese CDC who had taken Chinese cash to do scientific studies, yet she also got to serve as a neutral WHO COVID-19 investigator. | ||
| But here's kind of the buried lead, which maybe I think, retrospectively, we should have picked up that Peter Daszak was going to get sold out pretty soon. | ||
| Because on this commission, they also have someone from EcoHealth Alliance, a senior Hang on for a second. | ||
| This is important for the audience to understand this. | ||
| The whole purpose of getting to Wuhan is because everything that came out of Wuhan. | ||
| But EcoHealth Alliance and similar groups are still in favor and they still want to dictate how we respond to pandemics. | ||
| Okay, hang on for a second. | ||
| This is important for the audience to understand this. | ||
| The whole purpose of getting to Wuhan is because everything that came out of Wuhan. | ||
| We're going to have Naomi Wolf on here at 11.30. | ||
| She's going to shock you, Rahim, about how far the vaccine passports have gone in Europe with the companies falling in place. | ||
| This all leads to the vaccines. | ||
| The whole issue we can't get into today is going to lead to the vaccines, is going to lead to the vaccine passports, and the ability of the social credit scores and the struggle sessions they want to put you through, right? | ||
| This also gets back, and people, and I talked to some people at Politico working on a story about, they're now finally waking up to see their teacher, the mother's going to the school boards. | ||
| I said, you ain't seen nothing yet. | ||
| The firestorm's gonna come in mid-August when they try to Remember Fauci said you can't get to herd immunity until you vaccinate the school children because he doesn't take the antibodies, he doesn't take the T-cells that Peter Navarro's been banging on for months and months and months. | ||
| Hey dude, you gotta get the denominator right, right? | ||
| No, Fauci wants all the vaccines. | ||
| This spreads into so many other things. | ||
| It sets what we call sets the predicate. | ||
| Another thing I want to just mention while we have the time. | ||
| Christopher Wray, why does it take Natalie Winters, you know, at the time she was doing it, she was 19 years old, wasn't even 20, 19 years old. | ||
| The National Pulse, which is a handful of people, Peter Navarro, who's out of the White House now, doing his thing, working on his book, it's going to be published in the fall. | ||
| Why is he taking effort? | ||
| Where's Christopher Wray and the FBI? | ||
| Why are you chasing these associate professors at these universities? | ||
| Which should be chasing, don't get me wrong, that's all bad. | ||
| You've got so many massive issues involved in this. | ||
| You've had Dr. Yan. | ||
| You've got this. | ||
| Where's the FBI? | ||
| Where's Christopher Wray? | ||
| Where's the whole national security apparatus? | ||
| Why does it take the investigative ability of a 19-year-old woman, a website with a handful of employees, kind of bootstrapped by Rahim Hussam, and a guy that's writing a book from his time at the White House? | ||
| Why does it take a handful of people and a few others To do this, where's the FBI protecting the American people and, quite frankly, exposing what happened to the Chinese people? | ||
| This is why Christopher Wray's got to get fired. | ||
| Why sit there and just ask? | ||
| We spend a trillion dollars, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Cut out all the accounting nonsense and add it all up. | ||
| Cash money. | ||
| A trillion dollars a year for national security. | ||
| And a ton of that's the national security intelligence space, which, by and large, they're clowns. | ||
| Because I and Peter Navarro sit there, and if you want to see Navarro get mad, he'd sit there and read this stuff and say, why is this classified? | ||
| Their heads would blow up, right? | ||
| It's a group of clowns. | ||
| You've got a 19-year-old college kid from the University of Chicago, a small thing, and they're exposing to the heart of what the problem is. | ||
| We've got this massive apparatus that is essentially silent or covering it up. | ||
| Covering it up, Christopher Wray, since you had the information in April of 2020. | ||
| And, Wray, we got the receipts, dude. | ||
| We got the receipts. | ||
| We know what your interviews did with the FBI. | ||
| We know what your chief scientist did. | ||
| We've got the receipts. | ||
| Matt Gaetz is driving this way. | ||
| We're going to drive another way. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| The blood on the hands of the apparatus is, and you know why? | ||
| Because they don't care about the little guy. | ||
| They don't care about the little guy in India, in China, in the United States. | ||
| They do not care. | ||
| You don't register with them, because they're the managerial elite. | ||
| They're your bettors. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| They are your bettors. | ||
| And this is how your bettors think about you. | ||
| They will hide, they will cover up, whether it's Science Magazine, Nature Magazine, all these institutions. | ||
| The rot is down to the core of it. | ||
| And here's the beauty of it, and this is why I love this. | ||
| We're not going to give up. | ||
| You think Natalie Wonder's not working 18 hours a day? | ||
| Mr. Fauci, not just lawyer up, you've got to get the best lawyers in the world because we're coming for you, brother. | ||
| Coming for you. | ||
| And we're going to do it with facts, data-based, Evidence-based, science-based. | ||
| This team's going to return and take a short commercial break. | ||
| I just want to make clear. | ||
| You talk about Natalie and how young she is. | ||
| You talk about Peter working on his book. | ||
| I'm just on secondment from the Morton's Terrace, right? | ||
| I don't want to be doing this. | ||
| I'm on secondment. | ||
| By the way, I didn't want to say anything. | ||
| It's the most effective you've been. | ||
| It's insane. | ||
| This doubles down with me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If I could stop you from drinking, England match this afternoon, that's all I'm saying. | |
| By the way, and God, it broke his heart. | ||
| He's got to be the host this afternoon. | ||
| It gives me the big long face. | ||
| I can't drink for the English thing. | ||
| I said, by the way, you better host when you're drinking. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| Be back in the bar in a minute. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, in the next hour we're going to have Mike Lindell join us with updates. | ||
| He's down at the National Broadcasters Association meeting for religious broadcasters. | ||
| He's going to give us a live report from there. | ||
| Support the Freedom Fighters. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Type in promo code WAROOM. | ||
| Toppers, 30% off, throw in a couple pillows. | ||
| This is a thing that changes as you sleep for your back, all of it, but it's also a great gift for kids going to college. | ||
| Get the toppers, they got to put on top of the mattress. | ||
| Natalie Winters over there shaking her head. | ||
| She knows. | ||
| Since she's a junior, I think. | ||
| But go there today. | ||
| Got it? | ||
| MyPillow.com. | ||
| Type in promo code. | ||
| War room. | ||
| Peter, I want to tease, Peter Navarro's got a major piece coming out as Rahim called the shot a couple weeks ago of what was going to happen here with the Wuhan situation. | ||
| Peter Navarro called it back right in January, right after Biden went to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. | ||
| Talked about his economic policies, said this is going to be a massive problem. | ||
| We're going to bring back stagflation. | ||
| Huge piece of his coming out at 5 o'clock today. | ||
| He's going to be back on with Rahim and myself. | ||
| He's going to be the co-host. | ||
| We're going to walk through everything about stagflation. | ||
| Also, Navarro is going to update us on his analysis of Georgia. | ||
| It's a firefight down there right now. | ||
| With public broadcasting and people coming in attacking John Frederick, attacking Georgia Star News, attacking everything about the missing chain of custody for the 330,000 ballots. | ||
| A huge fight down there. | ||
| This is only going to get nastier. | ||
| It's only going to get hotter. | ||
| I want to play, we've got a thing from Fox News. | ||
| Let's play, do we have that clip? | ||
| Can we play the clip on Fox News? | ||
| Can we go ahead and play the Google clip? | ||
| Well, for nearly a year, Google has been working overtime to keep us from uncovering the true origins of COVID-19. | ||
| And we may now be learning why. | ||
| Let's tell the story, and let's start with Peter Daszak. | ||
| You remember him. | ||
| He is the scientist with EcoHealth Alliance who worked very closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on bat coronavirus research. | ||
| You may also recall, by the way, that Daszak served on the World Health Organization's COVID-19 investigation team. | ||
| This brings us to an important point. | ||
| The same guy that may have played a crucial role in creating the novel coronavirus was in charge of finding its cause. | ||
| That's interesting. | ||
| Very interesting. | ||
| It's like having your prime suspect be your lead investigator on a crime. | ||
| Anyway, as you know, no conclusion was reached in that investigation. | ||
| But since then, we know evidence has pointed widely to the idea that the virus did, in fact, start in a lab. | ||
| So, let's move the story forward. | ||
| What does this have to do with Google? | ||
| Well, a bombshell report out by the National Pulse reveals that for over a decade, Google.org, the tech giant's charity arm, has been financially supporting Peter Daszak and his EcoHealth Alliance research. | ||
| This here is one of his most recent coronavirus studies. | ||
| It's from 2018. | ||
| Let's go ahead and bring that down. | ||
| There's four minutes. | ||
| We'll put it up in the live chat, but it goes on to talk about the National Pulse. | ||
| By the way, you know, Natalie's parents, they're great, but they're the type of parents that's not official to the seat on Fox. | ||
| Very true. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| She went home for Father's Day and the whole thing was, hey, what's this? | ||
| I see the war room thing. | ||
| Bannon's kind of crazy. | ||
| Rahim, I don't know about Rahim. | ||
| Navarro's a total nutcase. | ||
| But then they saw it on Fox, it's like, oh my daughters, you haven't been wasting their time. | ||
| This tuition we've been burning at University of Chicago is paying off. | ||
| So it got an official, got the official Fox blessing. | ||
| Navarro, I want to wrap up here. | ||
| Talk about your ideas of where this goes for Mr. Fauci. | ||
| About two minutes and I got the crew here I want to finish with. | ||
| Fire Fauci, that's coming. | ||
| I said 90 days and I think that was maybe 30 or 40 ago. | ||
| We got to start playing that clip just to remind folks. | ||
| But here's where it goes. | ||
| It's the cover-up, not the crime itself. | ||
| What we're going to get Mr. Fauci on now is not telling the President of the United States and the American people in January of 2020 Most critical piece of information that this thing likely came from the lab, and that, by the way, he helped fund it and helped genetically engineer it through his gain of function. | ||
| That's where it's going to go, so we're going to trace... Yeah, but hold it, but hang on a second. | ||
| Yo, brother, brother, brother, I know you're out of my supervision for a couple days, you wander. | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| The crime itself, the cover-up's big, but the crime itself is ginormous. | ||
| Come on, this whole gain of function and the weaponization and the way he went and he snuck over to the EOB, the executive office building, and got some junior guy on the technology council, had a quote-unquote meeting, and then went back in December of 2017 and promulgated, hey, we're back in the gain-of-function business. | ||
| Barrick and all these guys, these guys endangered not just their country, they endangered the world. | ||
| I get it, but the original sin of Tony Fauci was January 31st, not coming clean with the American president, with the task force, With the American people, because if he had come clean at that point, everything would have changed. | ||
| Now, he's responsible for everything that followed from that, but for me, that's the original sin. | ||
| And here's how we get him. | ||
| It's like, we know it was the original sin, because he worked through Dasik, he worked through Zuckerberg, he worked through Christian Anderson to cover it up. | ||
| The cover-up, for me, is what basically tells the lie. | ||
| Otherwise, he slips away. | ||
| It's like, eh, maybe it's my lab, I didn't know. | ||
| he's not he doesn't have plausible deniability when you get him on the cover-up boom no sir okay real quickly for for for chris haystack for a dramatic stuff to see and uncanny more you guys were telling it would tell you right now where we're coming so go ahead get your roadblocks ready reheat natalie give me two minutes of heat Specifically? | ||
| About where we're going. | ||
| Look, I stand by my predictions. | ||
| I think they're broadly tracked with Dr. Navarro's. | ||
| And I will call Dr. Navarro, Dr. Navarro. | ||
| I won't call Mr. Fauci, Dr. Fauci anymore. | ||
| And he's given us no reason to. | ||
| I think all of it unravels. | ||
| So later today, we're going to be showing you how he actually, indeed, lied about the redactions in the email. | ||
| Who actually releases his emails, who clears the release of the emails, and who chooses which parts are redacted. | ||
| I just want to make sure. | ||
| We'll find out. | ||
| You're going to the podcast of Sorcerer, Kara Sorcerer, who's one of the most prominent people in Silicon Valley. | ||
| You're going to go back and deconstruct more of his interview to show more pathological lies. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| Sponsored by Huawei, guys. | ||
| Don't forget. | ||
| Sponsored by Huawei. | ||
| Rahim called that shot. | ||
| Yeah, I think, you know, it's no use doing CYA if you're doing it with a piece of transparent, you know, acetate. | ||
| And that's precisely what they're doing. | ||
| They're sending him out there to make excuses. | ||
| Every excuse, he buries himself deeper. | ||
| Your parents did such a great job of raising you. | ||
| I know your head won't get big, but it's just keep grinding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Always. | |
| No, but you're an inspiration also to these young people. | ||
| Where can people go to support your work? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Well, if you want to support my work and continue taking down the Chinese Communist Party and their puppets, you can go to fundrealnews.com to help support our investigations. | ||
| And I think we need to make a couple other people as famous as Peter Dolcek. | ||
| Jeffrey Sachs is going to be top of the list. | ||
| OK, we're going to have a short commercial break. | ||
| I've got to say something. | ||
| Natalie Ghosh, she's a rock star in China with the new federal state. | ||
| She speaks at the one-year commencement. | ||
| She's always so demure. | ||
| So she shows up for the main speech. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In a bright red dress. | |
| Right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a lucky color. | |
| A lucky color, right. | ||
| The CCP loved it. | ||
| Okay, no. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to be back with the one and only Mike Lindell. |
Export Selection