All Episodes
June 11, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:55
Episode 1,017 – Dr. Navarro Hosts Tomorrow’s News Today … Scofflaw Hunter Biden and Why Trump WonEpisode 1,017 – Dr. Navarro Hosts Tomorrow’s News Today … Scofflaw Hunter Biden and Why Trump Won
Participants
Main voices
b
boris epshteyn
08:58
j
john solomon
05:30
p
peter navarro
30:16
Appearances
Clips
a
anthony fauci
00:04
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
This has now killed more than 100 people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world.
You don't want to frighten the American public.
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans.
But you need to prepare for and assume.
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China.
This is going to be a real serious problem.
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on.
Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US.
Germany, a man has contracted the virus.
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide.
Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus.
Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500.
We have to prepare for the worst, always.
anthony fauci
Because if you don't, and the worst happens... War Room.
unidentified
Pandemic.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
peter navarro
How y'all doing today?
Peter Navarro sitting in.
I'm playing Wally Pipp to the great slugger Stephen K. Bannon, who is On assignment, along with Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters.
I'm going to be with you today.
We're going to be breaking some significant news on the Biden front.
And I'll be with you tomorrow for a two hour special.
Tomorrow, be sure and watch this.
We're going to look at, among other things, the complete and utter takedown, the final takedown of Anthony Fauci.
on several fronts.
I've got a great expert that will be coming in to talk about how China, Communist China, is steadily moving forward on a plan to seize the commanding heights of space to have their way with us.
And then we're going to talk about the Texas Attorney General race.
Why Texas?
Really, Ken Paxson has been at the forefront of border security issues and election fraud, two of the most important issues on the MAGA front, and he's got a globalist bushy on his tail, and it's a literal bushy, so we are going to get into that.
What I want to do is just briefly reflect a little bit on what this show does before we get into the breaking news.
You've heard the expression, tomorrow's news today.
I think what's beautiful about the War Room is it's actually Often next month's news today.
The people who are part of this show I think have an uncanny ability to see the chessboard, see many moves ahead, call the shots, and often make the shots.
And the analogy I use here Is the difference between kind of a central station electric power plant versus what's called a distributed net, right?
So with the central station power plant, what you have is you use coal or whatever nuclear to generate a bunch of electricity and you send it on a one-way street.
Off to the home and hopefully the lights stay on.
With a distributed network, everybody on the net contributes in some way to the energy that flows through the grid.
So here at the War Room, it's never, we're never pontificating.
It's not just, it's not about opinion.
It's about information for you.
With the idea of the Bannonite cannon, Which is action, action, action.
The idea of human agency, that you out there in the world, if we give you the appropriate information and tools, we together in this distributed network can affect change.
And so, in the War Room, you've got Bannon, you've got Rahim, you've got Natalie, you've got Posobiec, you've got the great Boris Epstein always coming in.
We, in turn, network with somebody you're going to meet quite shortly here with Just the News, John Solomon, one of the great reporters in Washington, D.C.
And you've got people down on the border like Burquam, just amazing kind of information that comes in.
And the goal here, I mean, we are at war.
It's a different kind of war.
It's not a kinetic war.
It's not a violent war.
It's a modern 21st century political war that involved information warfare.
You see it all the time on cable news, on the CNNs of this world, where it's nothing but the truth.
Nothing.
No truth.
Right?
You have legal warfare, the way, for example, that the Democrats stole the election.
And you have economic warfare.
There's a tremendous movement now, particularly among the social media oligarchs, to cancel and censor large segments of our population who hold even moderately conservative views and that all has economic impact.
And so what we're trying to do is arm you with the tools you need to fight back in this modern warfare.
And that's why I love being a part of the show, Sundance to Bannon's Butch sometimes.
But we'll miss him today, but we got a great show for you.
So what I'm going to do now is we're going to play a couple of clips for you to set up the situation where I'm going to bring in the great John Solomon for Just the News.
And he, as he always does, has found through sources Some absolutely nitroglycerin emails whereby Hunter Biden may well be being fit right now for an orange jumpsuit.
So, Denver, if you can, let's throw the clips and then we'll bring John right in.
unidentified
CNN's reporting that Trump asked the Ukrainian president to look into the Bidens and their connections to the Ukrainian prime minister.
Do you take this as kind of a normal line of questioning?
It's absolutely not normal.
I would say it is bordering on unethical, if not illegal.
President Trump has falsely accused your son of doing something wrong while serving on a company board in Ukraine.
I want to point out there's no evidence of wrongdoing by either one of you.
peter navarro
My son made a judgment.
I'm proud of the judgment he made.
I'm proud of what he had to say.
And let's focus on this.
All right, John.
The first thing I want to ask you is, did Anderson Cooper effectively lie when he said false accusations and no evidence?
Or at least do we have evidence now?
And if we have evidence, what is the crime, sir, that you're suggesting that Hunter Biden is guilty of right now?
john solomon
Well maybe Anderson Cooper didn't know because he didn't take any effort to know but Hunter Biden would have known at the moment that word was uttered at the moment his father made those comments that my son didn't do anything wrong or unethical that in fact he did have a problem.
Why do we know that new emails that the FBI obtained in December of 2019 show That in the summer of 16, as we were all focused on the Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton presidential race, Hunter Biden, his lawyers and his accountants were trying to figure out how not to get in trouble with the feds.
Why?
The FBI, the SEC had dropped a subpoena on him and they were getting closer to his bank records and his lawyers and his accountants knew that Hunter Biden had a problem.
What was that problem?
He had not paid taxes on about a million dollars worth of the money that Burisma, that Ukrainian company that everybody said it did everything right by, had paid him over the two years.
He just simply didn't pay taxes.
He's the vice president's son.
We know we're supposed to pay our taxes.
And they worked to create a narrative to try to get around the problem with the FBI and the SEC because his business partner was about to be indicted for a fraud scheme.
And the company where Hunter Biden got a lot of his money from was being audited, essentially, by the SEC, the IRS, and the FBI.
So for five years, they have stood silent and been quiet and allowed statements like Anderson Cooper or Joe Biden's, my son, never did anything unethical.
I think most people think if you skipped out on your taxes, you didn't pay your taxes, you're trying to create a narrative to explain it away, He probably didn't do the right thing, and now we know it.
Now we know that they know it in their own words, what these emails describe it as being.
peter navarro
Let me ask you a couple of questions here as we work through this.
First of all, how'd you get the emails?
john solomon
Well, we learned from sources both around Hunter Biden and in the law enforcement community that there were a series of emails that were not readily visible on that famous laptop hard drive that the FBI got in December of 19.
They were hidden in a different subsection of the hard drive, so a lot of the reporters who went through these wouldn't have seen these.
They were in a nested set of folders that weren't readily visible.
peter navarro
So this came off the laptop from hell, then?
Yeah.
Okay, and they were tucked away in some...
We don't know at this point whether Hunter Biden ever paid his taxes, is that correct?
john solomon
Well, as of 2017, we know in January 17, as Trump was coming in, a year after the whole SEC-FBI thing, his accountant writes him again and said, hey, Hunter, you still haven't paid the taxes on that Burisma money.
We got to try to get that taken care of.
We don't know whether he ever settled that up.
The email trail on taxes kind of runs out.
You don't see any more mention of it.
But we do know the FBI told Hunter Biden last December there is a reason to criminally investigate him for taxes.
Foreign lobbying and possible money laundering suspicions.
And that is what's ongoing now.
peter navarro
Do these emails show a conspiracy to commit any fraud or just a... You know, conspiracy is a big word, right?
john solomon
Yeah, listen, it could have been he's a lazy guy or that he had a problem with his cocaine at that time and wasn't paying attention to the P's and Q's of his finances.
But listen, I think there's another element here.
As you go through and they're recounting everything, they're trying to put all the money together.
Where'd he get his money from?
How'd he do it?
First off, you get a sense this guy's making seven figures off his father's vice president.
That's the first thing.
I think one year he made 1.2 million dollars.
He was living very well.
This is the kickback.
that he was getting. But the second part is there's something very odd about the Ukraine-Bruce Medeal, which we did not know about until we got these emails. We have been able to corroborate it with other people and confirm that this happened. When Hunter Biden got his board job, he had to pay out part of his money to the guy that gave it to him. He's paying a monthly finder's fee. This is the kickback.
peter navarro
This is essentially a kickback. Yeah, I don't want to call it an illegal thing.
So it'd be great to see the tax returns.
It'd be great to see the tax returns and see if he actually declared it on the cost side to basically reduce his income stream.
Do we have any ability as the American public to get to the bottom of this or as a private citizen is Hunter shielded from any kind of scrutiny?
john solomon
Well, listen, there's a lot of records from the case against his business partner that we're still trying to obtain.
Devin Archer was his right-hand man, the guy that went to Burismo with him.
They worked together.
They worked a lot of deals.
We're trying to get records out of the Justice Department under the Freedom of Information Act.
We know that Senators Johnson and Grassley tried desperately to get them last year and could not.
But there's many more emails that we have now extracted from the laptop.
that weren't available or were not readily visible to journalists a few months ago.
We're going through them and we're seeing some pretty remarkable stories. I'm just going to give you one little example of something that happens. Hunter Biden lands the Brisma deal. What is that deal? He's a board member. He's supposed to have fiduciary responsibility for Brisma as a board member. Almost the next day after he gets the deal, he arranges a contract to pay himself as a lawyer through his law firm $250,000 more.
He self-deals.
We would call this self-dealing in America.
Of course, it's Ukraine, so it's a little bit different.
Board member, then he pays himself through his law firm, and Burisma has to pay $250,000 the other way, on top of his board fees, on top of that $83,000 a month he's getting as a board member, to do work lobbying for Burisma.
peter navarro
These are going to come out next week.
I want to ask you kind of what's important here.
We know this guy was a coked-out, troubled person, right?
Doing bad stuff.
Is the bigger crime here, Joe Biden's crime, where he basically shielded his son from what should have been legal prosecution and disclosure of information, is that kind of the bigger concern here?
Because Biden was quite clear.
It's like he thinks his son was a Boy Scout.
I mean, he said it so much in the presidential debate.
john solomon
Yeah, you might want to take a look at the laptop.
You can find a lot of things that Boy Scouts would never do, I'll tell you that.
But let me tell you the most important thing.
As coked up and other problems that Hunter Biden has, and that's tragic, we're glad that he's trying to get his life back together, right?
He was calculating.
I just wrote a story two days ago, when the world was blowing up in February of 2014.
Russia invaded Ukraine.
Iran had a wave of, or excuse me, Iraq had a wave of deadly bombings.
There was a strife in the Middle East.
The Syrian civil war had begun, spunning out of control.
Hunter Biden is thinking, everyone's relying on my dad's foreign policy, where it's a great time to go make some money.
He comes up with a list with his business partners of foreign funds that he's going to try to go after, what we call the sovereign wealth funds of all of these governments. He goes to the French ambassador, the Italian president, the UAE ambassador, and he's asking him for help to make money. The biggest thing here is... We're on our way out on this segment, but let me just say that the big problem here is Joe Biden's conduct and James Biden's conduct in this matter.
peter navarro
I think.
I think that's kind of what we focus on.
Do you agree with that?
john solomon
I agree.
There's no way the Vice President wouldn't have known what his son was doing.
peter navarro
All right, John, you are doing the Lord's work here.
Break news today.
And when you get your next stuff out, you'll be back right here on The War Room.
Thank you, sir.
john solomon
Thanks, Peter.
peter navarro
Appreciate that.
So this Hunter Biden story is really a Joe Biden story.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide.
War Room.
Pandemic.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
CNN's reporting that Trump asked the Ukrainian president to look into the Bidens and their connections to the Ukrainian prime minister.
Do you take this as kind of a normal line of questioning?
It's absolutely not normal.
I would say it is bordering on unethical, if not illegal.
President Trump has falsely accused your son of doing something wrong while serving on a company board in Ukraine.
I want to point out there's no evidence of wrongdoing by either one of you.
peter navarro
My son made a judgment.
I'm proud of the judgment he made.
I'm proud of what he had to say.
And let's focus on this.
unidentified
Did Burisma pay $183,000 a month with no experience and energy?
My son did nothing wrong at Burisma.
I think he did.
We know Master Sondland was a key player in efforts to Okay, we had a great segment there with John Solomon in the A Block.
peter navarro
Let me deconstruct a little bit of this, what we have there, because I think the tendency here with this Burisma stuff and the laptop sometimes is kind of eyes glaze over.
We're not exactly sure of what's happened or what went wrong.
But let me see if I can hone in a little bit about what we heard there and what we know from these emails.
We know that in 2016, Hunter Biden was a scofflaw.
He was not paying his taxes.
And in 2017, he was reminded of that by his attorneys.
He either hid all of this bad behavior from his father, in which case his father was naive, or his father knew exactly what was going on and basically lied to the American public about that behavior.
You saw in the clip, Biden Sr.
repeatedly insists that Hunter did nothing wrong and that he was proud of his son.
I think it stretches credulity that a father Could be proud of a son who's a cocaine crack addict.
Engaged in pornographic activities that are all visible on the laptop from hell.
And also at the same time as a scofflaw with respect to paying his federal income taxes like you and I do through the nose.
At the same time that it was very clear that Hunter Biden did not have the skill set, basically, to do the job he was hired to do in Ukraine, to be on a board of directors of a major company.
It's very clear that he was put in that position simply because of his name.
And I think the worst part about it for me was that Air Force One was used, basically, as part of the crime family syndicate activity.
So I do think that at some point, we either gotta get to the complete and utter truth about this, and Joe and Hunter have to fess up to the crimes they committed, or we will glaze over and nothing will matter in this thing.
The other thing I think that's really important about those clips I showed you is we talked a little earlier about how we are at war and one of these wars is the information warfare.
And what we have now is the cable media, CNN, I think is the tip of the spear on that, social media, Twitter, Facebook, Google, YouTube, the tips of the spear on that.
And you can see, when Anderson Cooper sets the whole thing up, he makes the, he goes out of the way to say, falsely accused, right?
And no evidence.
And this is despite the fact that there's more evidence on Hunter Biden.
than probably anybody you could ever imagine because of that, not just because of the laptop from hell, which has an amazing amount of evidence, but also because just on the face of it, nothing smells right about the son of a president doing pay-for-play, not just in Ukraine, but in China and everywhere in between.
And let's not forget, in China, Hunter got over a billion dollars basically to buy up factories in Michigan and ship them off to Shenzhen, okay?
So, good for John Solomon.
I look forward to seeing more of this.
But the problem we face here is that in this information warfare, the corporate media has no interest In following up on any of these stories, so we're going to keep hammering on that and we're going to keep hammering on that.
What I want to turn now to is a story, an op-ed which appears in the Washington Times that I wrote.
I'll get more into this tomorrow on the Saturday show.
But it's about the Fauci situation.
And then at the bottom of the hour, we're going to have the great Boris Epstein come up, and we're going to do basically a landscape on where we're at with the election fraud across the six battleground states.
But here's what's, again, what's troubling me in this information warfare.
We're seeing now Fauci in jeopardy.
There's a growing mound of evidence around Fauci where it's very clear that he has committed crimes against humanity in the sense that it looks like he may well be culpable for the entire pandemic.
Never mind all his lying before about masks and hydroxychloroquine and everything in between.
It may well be that he's the father of the pandemic and, well, I'm going to make the case on that.
What bothers me is you've had kind of a trio now of information warfare gambits to basically, it's like damsel in distress, it's like Fauci in distress.
We talked about it on the show a couple days ago where we showed you a clip, and we'll show that tomorrow, where Chris Wallace, Fox News was talking to John Roberts on Roberts' show, and the spin there was no smoking gun in the thousands of Fauci emails, which is just a flat-out lie.
Now what was interesting is, see, this is when you know it's information warfare and spin.
You got the exact same spin from Chuck Todd yesterday on Meet the Propaganda, MTP, where it was exactly the same message with Fauci.
Very, very not coincidental.
And then the third thing is Fauci can't go on now any reputable news show that might ask him even a reasonably tough question.
So what he's doing now is, I don't know if it was The View, he went on some kind of happy talk show where they did nothing but treat him like a saint.
No tough questions.
So, what we really need to do now is keep the pressure on him.
And this, if you can, my Twitter is Real P. Navarro.
Real P. Navarro.
If you go to that Twitter, the article from the Washington Times is up.
You can click on the link there.
And do me a favor, do us a favor, let's get that tweeted out to other folks.
Retweet that if you can.
But here's the basic problem we have.
We've got a global pandemic that's killed over three and a half million people globally and over half a million Americans.
Three and a half million people globally, over half a million Americans.
These deaths have been caused by what they call in science The SARS-CoV-2 virus, okay, or aka COVID-19, right?
I prefer calling it SARS-CoV-2 because there was a SARS-CoV-1.
That happened in 2003.
It came from the same place, Communist China.
It was a novel coronavirus in the same vein as SARS-CoV-2, but there's really two big differences between SARS-1 and SARS-2.
And what we had with SARS-1 was a situation where it was far less deadly than SARS-2.
But more importantly, this whole theory about do these viruses come from nature or do they come from a lab, it was very clear and immediate that SARS-1 actually came from nature.
And the way we were able to confirm what they called the zoonotic theory was simply that in a very short period of time, They were able to trace the jump from animals to humans to two particular types of humans.
Raccoon dogs.
I don't know if you've ever seen one of those.
I don't know if people walk those around D.C.
I haven't seen one of those lately.
Or Palm Civic cats, right?
Again, they're not like your lap cats, right?
They're cats in the wild.
But the Chinese...
Peculiarly, culturally, they seem to like to take these animals to wet markets, slaughter them and eat them, and that creates the opportunity for these to jump to humans.
Now, why am I telling you this?
Because with SARS-1, we immediately confirmed the zoonotic jump from animals to humans theory.
Yeah, it came from nature.
Over here, SARS-2, it's been over a year and a half now.
Scientists have looked at over 1,000 types of possible animals, and they still haven't found anything.
So the point is that we could clearly rule out The wet market.
We can clearly rule out nature.
And as soon as you rule out nature as a source of this virus, the whole Pandora's box that Fauci opened with a genetically engineered, weaponized SARS-2 virus comes right to the foreground.
So that's what we're going to be exploring tomorrow in great detail.
We're going to take a break now and we're coming back with the inimitable, inestimable Boris Epstein and we're going to walk through the various battleground states and see where we're at.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
War Room.
Pandemic.
With Stephen K. Bannon.
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide.
War Room.
Pandemic.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
peter navarro
Yes, you can see this is not Stephen K. Vannin.
This is Peter K. Navarro.
The only thing we share in common is our middle initials here.
I'm happy to be with you today.
I'll also be sitting in for the great Vannin tomorrow in a two-hour special.
We're going to do the takedown of Tony Fauci.
We're going to have a great guest come in and talk about China's attempt to seize the commanding heights of space through its space program.
And we're going to talk a good bit about the Texas Attorney General's race coming up in 2022, where we have in Ken Paxson, a guy who's been pure MAGA, both on the border and on election fraud.
Paxson, of course, Was the Attorney General who filed the case that the Supreme Court was too cowardly to look at properly.
Let's remember there was three judges there who thought that case had merit, but the likes of Kavanaugh simply wouldn't go there.
So tomorrow's going to be a great show, but today it's going to be wonderful talking to Epstein here.
I'm going to bring him in a second.
I want to set the stage here.
What we have is a situation that, if we go back to November 3rd, at midnight, we had an election that President Donald J. Trump had clearly won.
He had commanding leads in what we call the Blue Wall States, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
He'd taken decisively both Florida and Ohio, and he was well on his way to a win.
Of course, what happened was By dawn the next morning, that election looks like it may well have been stolen, and therein lies the tale.
And what I did, subsequent to the November 3rd election, to get to the bottom of this, was a series of three reports.
Immaculate Deception, The Art of the Steal, and Yes, Trump Won.
What I did in that report First, I looked at how many and what types of potentially illegal ballots there were.
And then after that came out, people were saying, well, how did they do that?
And so in the art of the steal, I looked very clearly at the Democrats' grand strategy, which is basically a two-pronged strategy to stuff the ballot box with a flood of absentee and mail-in ballots.
At the same time that they were taking the election cops off the beat by reducing the level of scrutiny.
And what we have is a situation now where if you simply look at my report, It's almost like scorecards or maps that, for example, in Arizona, people can use to basically figure out what went wrong.
So what we're going to do now with the great Boris Epstein, who's been boots on the ground in all six of these battlegrounds, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.
So we're going to do kind of a around-the-horn kind of And Boris, let's toss to you right now and let's start with this whole issue of Arizona.
So where do we stand with Arizona?
boris epshteyn
Mini, Steve Bannon, you look great over there.
Love the jacket.
You're killing it.
It's great to be on with you today, my friend, on a Friday.
Very important day.
And this Friday is important because it is likely the last Friday during which there is a recount continuing in Arizona.
I am hearing that it is going to wrap up between tomorrow and early next week.
The recount part of that audit is going to wrap up and then it'll be on to the re-canvas.
You had Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, already come out and effectively attack the re-canvas.
Oh, we're going to put out some procedures that are appropriate.
Civil and criminal for any audit.
unidentified
It's obvious that the Biden GOJ... Clearly they're trying to intimidate folks.
peter navarro
Let me ask you two questions here.
Do we have any insight as to what the recount Is going to tell us, number one, and then number two, I really want to get into the logistics of the canvas.
Do they have enough troops to go out and effectively knock on doors and figure out whether the people who voted from those places are actually the people who are legally registered?
And do we worry that those troops might be infiltrated by the other side?
boris epshteyn
Answer number one is there's not going to be, and I believe there shouldn't be, public intermediate results because it's a full audit.
It's not a recount or a recanvass.
Having said that, what I'm hearing is that 25, 25% of boxes during this recount have had the wrong amount of ballots.
Again, just think about how staggering that math is.
2.1 million ballots.
And you know, often the Arizona audit verbiage gets confused because people think that the whole state is being recounted.
This is just Maricopa County.
2.1 million ballots.
There's another about a million ballots in other counties.
Pinal, Pima, Cochise, other counties around Arizona.
So this audit of 2.1 million ballots in a state where the final count only had a 10,000 difference, It's vital and important, but it's only one county.
unidentified
It's still only Maricopa.
peter navarro
Keep in mind here that with Arizona, relative to the six battleground states, according to my analysis, that should be the cleanest.
That should be the one that's most accurate.
And you're telling me that it's a horror show, correct?
boris epshteyn
It's a disaster.
It's a horror show.
It's an absolute mess.
So about 25% of boxes don't have the right amount of ballots in them.
That's about 500,000, you know, 550,000 votes that are impacted by that number.
Say that the gradient of error is 10%.
Well, that's about 50,000 votes in a state, again, that was only separated by 10,000 between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
So the amount of problems that Arizona has just out of this recount cannot be overstated.
And then the re-canvas is only going to exacerbate that.
Let's talk about the canvas versus the count so the listeners kind of get this.
peter navarro
Let's talk about the canvas versus the count so the listeners kind of get this.
It's like the rule here is that the canvas is far more important than the count in the following sense.
It's like, the count, if they do a recount, they may be off by, looks like, quite a bit, right?
That's one set of facts.
But with the canvas, that's where you identify the real fraud.
I'll give you some examples, right?
Let's say you get a vote from a certain address.
Was that a legally registered voter who still resides there?
Or was that what we call a ghost voter who might have So first of all, I agree with you that Canvas is important.
Was it an illegal alien? Was it a felon? So tell us Boris, what's the, what's the, what are the troops?
How many troops do they have to go out? Are they actually going to go out kind of like walk precincts?
Yes in a canvas and figure this out. What's this look like?
boris epshteyn
So first of all, I agree with you the canvas is important.
I think they're both very important, especially seeing what we're finding out about the huge margin of error in terms of ballots and boxes and also let's not forget that missing database that was maybe partially or even fully recovered but nevertheless was clearly moved at some point between Election day and when this information was turned over under subpoenas. That was the recount a recanvass. Yes, they're going to go out They're going to canvas the precinct Tell me about the troops, though.
peter navarro
How many have they got?
If you don't know, that's fine, but do we have any idea?
Is it like 100 people, 1,000 people?
boris epshteyn
It's going to be hundreds of people.
peter navarro
What's the army look like?
boris epshteyn
I think it's hundreds of people, and it's going to be overwhelmingly volunteers.
You've got to remember that there have been hundreds of people participating in the recount.
They have three shifts going, over 30 tables, we liken it to a Vegas casino sometimes.
They keep bringing on more and more tables.
So, there's going to be at least hundreds of people involved who are vetted, who are volunteers.
They may have participated in elections before, in terms of screening, etc.
But these are people who know how elections are run, and that's who's going to conduct this canvas.
Now here's what I'll also tell you.
My expectation is you're going to see an absolute onslaught from the DOJ, from Perkins Coie, from the whole Democrat machine to try to get this re-canvas paused, if not fully stopped.
So there's going to be a fight between when October and re-canvas is finalized.
peter navarro
And when you mention Perkins-Coy, it's kind of a little inside baseball, but that's the big Democrat firm that basically engineered the illegal consent decree in Georgia behind everybody's back.
And what's the guy's name at Perkins-Coy?
unidentified
Mark Elias.
boris epshteyn
Mark Elias, that's the evil genius.
peter navarro
Oh, don't forget, Perkins-Coy didn't just engineer... He's the Darth Vader of election fraud, right?
boris epshteyn
Right.
consent decree the also effectively engineered of the fake dossier that the media used to have the democrats used to attack president trump so perkins coolies really this so the cesspool of elect of election disintegrating right of of election fraud of voter fraud but also political disinformation and i will not be a part of the uh... part of the attack against the recanvass yeah this is part of the uh... the information warfare in the in the
peter navarro
legal warfare what they call lawfare aspect of the whole strategy that we here in uh...
in in maga land are having to deal with.
Let's switch gears now and go maybe next to Georgia.
Arizona seems to have been a rallying cry for the Georgians.
My research showed that Georgia is as good as Arizona is, Georgia is the cesspool Bernie Jones has been eloquent about all this.
Where do we stand?
What's the likely chess move here going forward in Georgia over the next two to four weeks?
What's the best we might hope for?
boris epshteyn
Well, Peter, as I talk about, right, this is the freight train of audits.
And it started in Arizona and it's coming across the country.
And I believe the next stop is going to be either in Georgia or Pennsylvania.
Those are the two biggest cesspool states.
So in Georgia, Vernon Jones went out and visited Arizona.
Bert Jones and Beach were both out in Arizona as well.
So the next step there, we need a subpoena.
The Georgia legislation needs the subpoena for an audit in Georgia, be it specific counties, Fulton, DeKalb, etc., or throughout the whole state.
That has to be the next action.
unidentified
We'll hit Pennsylvania after the break.
peter navarro
I want to stay on Georgia.
Now, politically, what has to happen for any action to happen?
We know that the Governor and the Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, the Governor, and Raffensperger, the Secretary of State, are severely compromised by the corporations and by the globalist faction of the Republican Party.
boris epshteyn
That's a formidable obstacle. What needs to happen at the legislature level to overcome that problem, Boris? MAGA members have to issue a subpoena, just like Karen Fan did in the state senate in arizona She didn't have to wait for Doug Ducey, the governor, who again hasn't done enough, just like Brian Kemp hasn't, not even nearly enough.
unidentified
And who are they subpoenaing?
boris epshteyn
They would send a subpoena to the Georgia Board of Elections, or specifically, you know, Fulton County Board of Elections.
Just like in Arizona, State Senator Karen Fann, the committee under her sent a subpoena to the Maricopa County Board of Elections.
That's the process.
State Senate under a committee.
It could be the Judiciary Committee.
It's the appropriate committee.
In Pennsylvania, it's the Committee on Government that sent a subpoena to the specific county or state Board of Elections.
peter navarro
All right.
We got a break now.
We'll come back at the break, and what we want to do is move on to several of the other battlegrounds.
But clearly, what's happening here in Magalan, what's happening in the War Room, Is we're able to get you significant amount of information out into this country and through the grassroots, through human agency, you are making this happen.
And that's the way it's got to be.
So we'll be right back with the great Boris Epstein.
boris epshteyn
War Room.
unidentified
Pandemic.
With Stephen K. Banham.
The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide.
War Room.
Pandemic.
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.
peter navarro
All right, Wally Pip here, sitting in for the great DiMaggio, or Peter K. Navarro sitting in for Stephen K. Bannon.
Have it any way you want.
I'll be with you tomorrow for two hours, starting at 10 a.m.
here in the War Room.
We're going to have a great special tomorrow.
We're going to get three points to the compass.
We're going to do the ultimate takedown of Anthony Stephen Fauci and show why he is likely the godfather of the pandemic that's killed over three and a half million people worldwide and over half a million Americans.
We're going to go and talk with a guy named Greg Autry who is one of the premier space experts in the world and he's going to explain how the communist Chinese using stolen American technology trying to seize the commanding heights of space while our space shuttle was grounded and then I think it's really important because what this show does is It's like, it's like not tomorrow's news today.
It's like next month's news today, right?
We're going to look more closely at this emerging Texas Attorney General race where Ken Paxson, who is really doing important MAGA work both on border Security, as well as stolen election issues, is being challenged by literally a bushy with a Bush last name, Karl Rove.
Puppet master there.
It's all kind of, I would call it nefarious, globalist nefariousism.
So we'll do that tomorrow.
Now, what I'm going to do now is we're going to re-engage with the great Boris Epstein.
We're going through a review of the battleground states and the stolen election.
The way I want to set the stage for this is simply that when I did my three reports on election fraud, I went a little bit of Tolstoy on you, where every state was different in terms of how it actually did its fraud.
So what we're going to do, we did Arizona and Georgia last block, we're going to turn now First to Pennsylvania, and one of the things that really was troubling about Pennsylvania was the whole issue of observer abuses, which is to say that in places like Philly, they had bordering on gangsters, preventing the Republican From looking at how the ballots were being counted, opened, whether they were signed or not.
So, Boris Epstein, I think you've been in Philly and looked at that.
Where are we at challenging the Pennsylvania results?
Because those are a lot of electoral college votes.
boris epshteyn
I was actually in the courtroom in Johnstown, PA when Rudy Giuliani argued the case in Pennsylvania, the federal case about observers.
Here's where we are.
Pennsylvania is probably either the worst or the second worst cesspool state there is.
And right now we had a great delegation from Pennsylvania go to Arizona and look at the audit there and confirm just how squared away it is.
State Senator Doug Mastriano led that delegation.
Now, it is vital.
For Pennsylvania, for the state senator there in charge of the Committee on Government, Dave Argyle, to issue a subpoena.
Same thing, issue a subpoena to Allegheny County, Philadelphia County, maybe other York County, and demand an audit.
Demand an audit under those subpoenas.
We now know, from Arizona, the courts are absolutely recognizing the power of legislatures to demand such audits, to subpoena the information.
That's what needs to happen next in Pennsylvania.
peter navarro
Let me ask you this question, Boris.
In Arizona, I thought that the Republican legislature actually passed some kind of bill to trigger the audit rather than subpoena.
Am I wrong about that?
boris epshteyn
It's a subpoena.
That's what's being enforced in Arizona.
There may be a vote to produce a subpoena, and every legislature works differently.
But a subpoena is something in Pennsylvania that the State Senator Orgel is able to do directly under his power.
peter navarro
And what is your assessment of the worst abuses there in terms of fraud and irregularities?
boris epshteyn
What are we looking for there?
I think that it's pretty widespread.
I think A, you're looking for, as you said, observer abuse, and B, we're looking for good old-fashioned Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, big city Democrat machine fraud of increasing the ballots and gutting the checks.
Increasing the ballots and gutting the checks.
As we've talked about, I'm not a machine guy.
I'd love to know what happened, and I believe it's a great option, but I think what happened here in Philadelphia, in Pittsburgh, throughout Pennsylvania, throughout the country, as we know from the Time Magazine article written by Molly Ball, which was sort of the victory dance by the Democrats, is that they used COVID To absolutely flood the country with ballots and to get rid of the checks.
And what do you get as a result?
You get voter fraud, you get election fraud, and you get the notion that Joe Biden somehow got 81 million votes while drawing 5 or 6 people to his rallies.
peter navarro
And I believe we're still looking for that tractor-trailer truck that was allegedly moved from New York into Pennsylvania with what would have been probably hundreds of thousands of fake ballots.
All right, quickly, we've only got a couple minutes left here.
After Pennsylvania, Boris, what's the next state that might bear some MAGA fruit for us?
boris epshteyn
From Pennsylvania, you've got to go to Michigan, Detroit.
More ballots cast than there were.
More votes than ballots cast.
Absolute discrepancy in Detroit, Michigan.
There you've got to go to Wisconsin.
We know from the audit that was already conducted by President Trump's campaign that in Milwaukee and Dane County, which is where Madison is, there were over 200,000 unlawful ballots.
Guess what, Peter?
Only 20,000 ballots separate.
Joe Biden and President Trump at last count.
So, we know that those two states, specifically Michigan and Wisconsin, were susceptible.
From there, you've got to look at Nevada.
You've got to take a look at New Mexico.
So, this fright train of audits, as I keep talking about, Gateway Pundit is now using the term, and you know what?
God bless.
Anybody and everybody should be using the term.
The fright train of audits, the fright train of election integrity, is coming across the country.
It's going from Arizona to Georgia to Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, so on and so forth.
And it is important, it's vital, and it is key to our democracy.
peter navarro
Hit me with your freight train to social media.
How can we get a hold of you?
boris epshteyn
The freight train of social media is at BorisCPU on Twitter, Boris underscore Epstein, Boris underscore EPS, H-T-U-Y-N on Instagram, on the gram, at BorisCPU on Twitter.
Stay strong, God bless, have a great weekend.
peter navarro
Thank you, Boris.
All right.
I'll see you tomorrow, team.
Please go to my Twitter, Real P. Navarro.
There's an article in the Washington Times on Dr. Anthony Fauci.
I need you to retweet that and send that around the world.
Read it carefully.
I'm going to walk through that in the first part of the show tomorrow.
And also the hydroxychloroquine follies with Tony Fauci.
All right.
Take care.
Export Selection