June 5, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:23
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| In Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, and Georgia. | ||
| And having this all serve as a conduit to his dream of being reinstated to the presidency by August. | ||
| In fact, a trio of Pennsylvania Republicans just went on a pilgrimage to Arizona to tour the Cyber Ninjas audit, and at least two of them came away publicly pushing for a similar ninja audit in Pennsylvania. | ||
| I cannot believe I'm actually saying these words. | ||
| Pennsylvania's Attorney General Josh Shapiro told Rachel Maddow this last night. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is who the modern GOP is, certainly who the modern GOP is here in Pennsylvania. | |
| Heck, one of those three people who went down there is the leading Republican candidate for governor. | ||
| These are folks who are dangerous. | ||
| These are folks who are trying to undermine our democracy. | ||
| If they were to go forward with this sham audit, they would have to go through me. | ||
| They will not succeed, and they will be violating their oath of office, and I believe also committing some very serious unethical conduct. | ||
| It's June 5th, Year of Our Lord 2021. | ||
| You've probably picked up on the fact that you have a different host from Washington, D.C. | ||
| We may have similar length hair, but it is indeed Natalie Winters from the National Pulse. | ||
| I'm an investigative reporter hosting today's show. | ||
| Steve Bannon will be joining us down the line, but I just want to say one quick thing in response to that clip. | ||
| Unethical conduct is certainly an interesting phrase to be used to describe the ongoing election audit, and I think it goes back to what Saul Alinsky once said, accuse others of what you are guilty of. | ||
| So, Steve, if you want to talk about what's going on, I'll throw to you. | ||
| Yeah, I want to thank Natalie Winters as the first in the history of the war room, our first female host. | ||
| I want to welcome her and thank her for anchoring down in Washington, D.C. | ||
| Still a lot of us on the road covering other stories. | ||
| I think it's very interesting. | ||
| We wanted to play that clip. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, you see the complete meltdown the mainstream media is into right now. | ||
| But here's the beauty of it, Natalie. | ||
| Velshi actually walks through where we're going. | ||
| Georgia, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Michigan, Wisconsin. | ||
| He goes, I can't believe I'm saying these words because they understand that this is happening. | ||
| It's game on right now. | ||
| A lot going on today. | ||
| I just want to tee up the show. | ||
| Natalie Winters, one of the reasons we asked her to anchor. | ||
| It is her reporting, I think it's Dr. Li Min Yan's defection from Hong Kong back in, what, March of 2020, coupled with the really indefatigable reporting of Natalie Winters at the National Policy Investigator reporting with the editor over there, Rahim Kassam, that has put down very early on the stakes in this, back in early 2020, of exactly what was going on in Wuhan, what was going on with the Biological Weapons Program, | ||
| And we told everybody that, hey, the two things we got to get to the bottom of is November 3rd, the 3 November movement, to get full forensic audits in all these states, that Shapiro and these guys are not going to be able to stand the actual scrutiny under truth of what went on in places like Philadelphia, Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Phoenix. | ||
| And that's why their focus is on places like Maricopa County to kick off. | ||
| So they can't hide from the truth, just like they can't hide From the truth. | ||
| The Collins, the NIH, all of these people that have really driven the agenda for the last year and a half about the mask, about the lockdowns, about the vaccines, and now about the vaccine passports. | ||
| It's all crumbling around them. | ||
| We're going to get into detail. | ||
| Colonel Salin is going to come in, work with Natalie on a very special section of this to talk about, hey, it's just not Wuhan. | ||
| It's much deeper and broader than that. | ||
| So we want to put you ahead of the curve on that. | ||
| Peter Navarro is going to join us. | ||
| Natalie, And Peter, we're going to talk about tonight in North Carolina, the president, former president Trump, President 45, is going to give a speech tonight to lay out his agenda. | ||
| He talked yesterday on the Wayne Allen Roots Show, and they gave compliments to what we talked about. | ||
| But President Trump actually may be Speaker of the House in 2022. | ||
| But I think tonight you're definitely going to hear strong indications he's going to run in 2024. | ||
| But he's specifically going to talk about Tony Fauci. | ||
| And so Peter Navarro and Natalie are going to I get into that we've got live reports coming from Georgia Vernon Jones Bernie Kerik, we've got John Fredricks and of course Joe Allen joins us. Joe Allen's going to preview these UFR reports that are coming out this week quite serious he's going to go through all that. | ||
| So Natalie one thing I want to talk about is what this show and the power of the show is really getting people engaged. | ||
| As you can see from your investigative reporting in Wuhan and other things related to NIH, you know last night I think Daily Mail had five stories up about investigations. | ||
| Each one was kind of predicated on something you've done before. | ||
| You had Particularly the Peter Daszak situation, that now it's gunning on Daszak. | ||
| And one thing that I think you've brought up to the nation is that it's not, Fauci said, oh I think it was a $600,000 grant over four years, right? | ||
| And now we're finding out, as you've pointed out, it's really Tens of millions of dollars over multiple years. | ||
| Now they're actually getting to the bottom of the Pentagon. | ||
| I think it's somewhere maybe over a hundred million dollars given to Dasik that he spread out. | ||
| But the investigative reporting has done it, and it's this audience sharing it. | ||
| Here's the key to this show. | ||
| This show's a war room. | ||
| What we try to do is get the best investigative reporters up there, get the best financial, capital markets, investigative reporting, geopolitics, politics, put that information out for you, particularly nomenclature. | ||
| Talk about process, critical path, the statics and dynamics of what I call of events of how things work, how systems work, how they can be deconstructed and looked at, taken apart and kind of understand that these are not conspiracy theories. | ||
| These are way kind of systemic issues. | ||
| And if you really look down and drill down on it, and that's why you have the mainstream media now in a meltdown. | ||
| They're in a total meltdown about the three November movement. | ||
| Why are they in a meltdown? | ||
| They understand that once you get in there and actually start looking at the hard evidence of the facts on the ground, that this is going to shift very quickly to Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election. | ||
| I don't think there's any doubt about that. | ||
| And that's why they're freaking out about Arizona. | ||
| Rachel Maddow says they now have their hands on the ballots. | ||
| The same thing is about the Wuhan lab. | ||
| More information comes out. | ||
| You understand that this was either... | ||
| It's not a lab leak. | ||
| It's not just about a lab leak. | ||
| That's another misdirection play. | ||
| This is about a man-enhanced gain-of-function experiment among a number of experiments they were doing in gain-of-function, really essentially weaponizing. | ||
| They say, well, they're doing it to understand viruses better and to have cures. | ||
| That's just nonsense. | ||
| The reason this thing was shut down by the Obama administration, the reason this thing is very dangerous, Is the fact that these are weaponizations, these viruses, and particularly in some place like Wuhan, that is completely and totally just not regulated. | ||
| It was not supervised, and we've done that for a long time. | ||
| One of the things I want to ask you, Natalie, and by the way, to the audience, you're key. | ||
| Pushing out the information is key. | ||
| Natalie, about Collins, you're particularly concerned about Collins, that he hasn't got enough spotlight. | ||
| People have been focused on Fauci. | ||
| He's really the head of the operation. | ||
| Talk to us about some of your concerns about Dr. Collins. | ||
| Sure, well we have a forthcoming story at the National Pulse. | ||
| It may be up by now, I'll have to check and see in the break, but it's about how Francis Collins, who is of course the director of the NIH, so that's the federal agency that oversees Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, how he actually serves on the advisory board, catch that, the advisory board of a conference that is sponsored by BGI Genomics. | ||
| And people may remember that firm, we've done extensive reporting on it at the National Pulse, Even 60 Minutes has highlighted this company for its ties not just to the Chinese Communist Party but also the Chinese military. | ||
| 60 Minutes did really an amazing report on the company talking about how officials both in the intelligence community and even the FBI were flagging this company as sending COVID-19 test kits to the United States All as part of a plot to steal American DNA and American genetic information. | ||
| This company is bankrolled by the Chinese government, by the Chinese Communist Party, and it's founded by an individual who's worked on a ton of studies that have actually been funded by the People's Liberation Army. | ||
| And do you know what Francis Collins has to say about that individual, right, the founder of BGI Genomics? | ||
| Well, he calls him a friend. | ||
| When he's addressing this conference, which takes place in China, every year when he was speaking there in 2016, Francis Collins also attended the opening the first year of this event in 2006. | ||
| So, you know, people like Chris Wallace like to get up there on Fox and say that people like me and you are politicizing the origins of COVID-19, that we're politicizing where this virus came from. | ||
| Well, you know what? | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party politicized where this virus came from when they started running discreet, covert biological weapons programs out of lab facilities in Wuhan, at the Wuhan lab. | ||
| They used U.S. | ||
| taxpayer dollars to do it. | ||
| The Chinese Communist Party has been politicizing American science and American scientists for over a decade. | ||
| They've been stealing our research grants. | ||
| They've been trying to decouple Western scientists and American scientists from the West to have their innovation and their developments boost the development of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Remember, it was Xi Jinping who said in 2013 while speaking at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, which is of course the oversight organization of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who said high-end science and technology are a national weapon in modern times. | ||
| But Francis Collins, Anthony Fauci, all these people who just want to conduct scientific research want to send your taxpayer dollars to a regime that wants to use that money and science to really overtake the United States of America. | ||
| Our host is Natalie Winters. | ||
| She's from the National Pulse, the top investigative reporter, I think, on this topic in the country, probably in the world. | ||
| Natalie, real quick, he was on Hugh Hewitt, Collins on Hugh Hewitt, to try to start to cover himself now in the conservative media. | ||
| And he said when Hugh asked his question about, hey, would you finance these regimes like North Korea? | ||
| He says, well, you can't blame the Chinese. | ||
| No, there is some association with, you know, the Chinese Communist Party and the Wuhan lab, but you can't blame these scientists. | ||
| These are men of science. | ||
| What say you to that, ma'am? | ||
| Well, Francis Collins, I think, needs to read the National Pulse because we've reported extensively about how the Wuhan Institute of Virology is not just a run-of-the-mill Chinese scientific organization. | ||
| The researchers there take oaths and pledges of allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party every day. | ||
| You can see pictures in an article that we have. | ||
| of researchers with their hands over their hearts taking the Pledge of Allegiance to the Chinese government. | ||
| You see all these researchers hosting study sessions where they study whether it's five-year plans, Chinese Communist Party goals and agenda. | ||
| So Francis Collins can really whitewash and try to euphemize what the Wuhan Institute of Virology is, but make no mistake it carries out the diktats, the decrees, the agenda, the global agenda of the Chinese Communist Party which is inextricable from their quest and their desire to really boot America off of the world stage. And they're using science, they're using technology, like I said, in the words of Xi Jinping, to do so. So Francis Collins is incredibly misguided. It's | ||
| really concerning that he's running the NIH, whether it's ignorance or just not knowing what's going on, or if he knows what's going on and is covering it up. I don't know which is worse, but it's really concerning. And frankly, I think it speaks to the kind of so-called American elite class, these American experts who we're told to trust every day blindly, but at the end of the day, they don't know what's going on. They don't understand the nature of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| It's a lead capture, and Francis Collins, I'd recommend all those guys, they should lawyer up, because the investigation is about to start. | ||
| As Raheem Kassam says, we're going to get into the prosecution phase. | ||
| Look, I want to thank all of our Chinese audience that comes in through Mandarin, GNews, GTV. | ||
| We've got over 57 million downloads on the podcast. | ||
| We're always there broadcasting for Lao Bai Jing, the deplorables of China. | ||
| I also want to thank the new audience that's joined us on Samsung TV+. | ||
| That is the new, the Real America Voice audience that's watching on Samsung TV+, Channel 1029. | ||
| So I want to thank everybody. | ||
| Also want to talk about a very special offer from our sponsor. | ||
| That is MyPillow. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com today. | ||
| You gotta type in promo code War Room for the following. | ||
| We're the only people that have it. | ||
| 30% off the complete sleep system put together by Mike Lindell. | ||
| This is a system that's got A state-of-the-art mattress. | ||
| It's got two pillows. | ||
| It's got Giza sheets. | ||
| It's got a 10-year warranty. | ||
| Most importantly, it's got six months. | ||
| If you don't love it, you send it back. | ||
| Get all your money back. | ||
| This is a special offer for the War Room Posse. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com. | ||
| Promo Code War Room. | ||
| The complete sleep system. | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| Mattress, pillows, sheets, all of it. | ||
| This is what the technicians and the strategists over at MyPillow have been working on to take it to the next level. | ||
| So go there today. | ||
| You've got to type in promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Okay, we're taking a short commercial break. | ||
| We'll be back in a moment with Colonel Sellin from the formerly Fort Detrick and Natalie Winters. | ||
| All next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| I want to thank, once again, Samsung TV Plus, our audience there. | ||
| Real America's voice expands daily. | ||
| Go to channel 1029 for our audience there. | ||
| I want to thank you and welcome you to The War Room Posse. | ||
| I'm going to flip back to Natalie Winters in a second. | ||
| I just want to tell people we're going to get to Arizona, Georgia. | ||
| We've got it all. | ||
| We're going to have live coverage of Vernon Jones' speech. | ||
| John Fredericks down in Georgia. | ||
| Vernon Jones, who's lighting it up down there. | ||
| And here's a great thing. | ||
| Last night I heard at the Vernon Jones reception, I think there were 500 people. | ||
| They look for a show of hands. | ||
| How many were first-time delegates to the convention? | ||
| Two-thirds. | ||
| To 70% of the people, 75% of the people raised their hands. | ||
| They were all shouting out the war room of how the Dan Schultz program, a precinct comedian, precinctstrategy.com had inspired them. | ||
| They're having a great time. | ||
| They're taking power. | ||
| People get engaged. | ||
| People that are doing this are feeling empowered. | ||
| They're having a great time. | ||
| And their rabble rouse was down there. | ||
| They're going to force a full forensic audit in Georgia because of the Trump movement, the America First. | ||
| So it's just fantastic. | ||
| Natalie, I want to turn to you, but one thing I've got to say, Boris Epstein and Raheem Kassam's imprint on this show is getting bigger every day. | ||
| I notice Colonel Sullen's upped, not just the technology, he's upped his look. | ||
| So I know it's not because of me, it's got to be because of Boris. | ||
| Natalie, over to you and Colonel Sullen. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| Well, Steve, you're always so kind saying that my reporting is helping, you know, lead the fight to push back against some of the disinformation that we're hearing about where COVID-19 came from. | ||
| But I think Dr. Sellen also definitely gets some of that prize, too. | ||
| I'd say he's engaging and Information guerrilla warfare almost every day, putting out some really, really great tweets and articles about where this virus came from. | ||
| So as you like to say, Steve, COVID-19 and this whole lab leak theory is certainly a misdirection play, but from the Chinese Communist Party's perspective, it's not misdirection. | ||
| It's very calculated, right? | ||
| They're trying to craft this narrative. | ||
| So Dr. Selin, if you could just kind of reset for a second and outline a Why we know this virus didn't just A come from nature B come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology and just kind of a lab leak theory and how the PLA was involved and what they're doing to cover it up? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well you only need to look at the structure of the virus to know immediately that it was it was not from nature because it has so many different anomalies. | |
| I mean first of all it was it appeared to be pre-adapted for human infection But there are structural anomalies. | ||
| For example, there's a furin cleavage site which doesn't exist in any other bat coronavirus relative that we can find. | ||
| And we know that an insertion of a furin cleavage site would increase infectivity and pathogenicity, make it essentially more lethal. | ||
| And we also know that PLA scientists know how to insert that. | ||
| So, but most of all, I think, for ordinary people to understand, we've been over a year now, almost 18 months, and no one can identify a natural origin of this virus. | ||
| So I think it's crystal clear at this point that it came from a laboratory. | ||
| It came from, in fact, the PLA's biowarfare program. | ||
| Now, I think there's been a lot of attention focused on the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but the PLA had a much broader system. | ||
| They were working on this virus at a number of different places, and different levels of the PLA were working on it. | ||
| So, you know, I think the first step, of course, is to make sure everybody understands that it comes from the laboratory. | ||
| And I think it's necessary now to make the link between the actual and true link between the laboratory creation of this virus and the People's Liberation Army. | ||
| Yeah, we had reporting at the National Pulse on how about, I'd say, three or four months ago the Wuhan Institute of Virology, their Chinese language website, had actually scrubbed the names of researchers who previously had listed affiliations with various arms of the People's Liberation Army. | ||
| and universities that they fund. So you definitely are right that A, the PLA had a deep hand to play in COVID-19, but also that they're attempting to cover it up. | ||
| So I'm just curious, you've obviously done a lot of research on this. | ||
| You have an amazing army of Chinese people who are helping you translate and really dig deeper into the origins of this virus. So when you see people like, say, Peter Doshak, Jeffrey Sachs, even Anthony Fauci, going up there spewing what I would say are Chinese communist party talking points about where the virus came from. | ||
| Do you think that that's just ignorance and not understanding what's going on, right? | ||
| They haven't seen the information? | ||
| Or do you think that there's something more nefarious going on? | ||
| with regards to say where their allegiance lies, the kind of money they've been taking, the business deals they've been inking. Why have we seen from virtually every single, whether it's mainstream media outlet, mainstream kind of scientific talking head, why have they been propagating and really purveying this, first of all, the natural origins theory, now pivoting to the lab leak theory, but why are they so keen on covering up the Chinese | ||
| military's involvement with the origins of this virus? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you're right on target, Natalie. | |
| They are culpable, in my opinion. | ||
| They have been covering up the laboratory origin of the virus since the very beginning, and they all have vested interests. | ||
| As you point out, you know, Their careers, money, their professional reputations are all on the line. | ||
| So, you know, they have, in my opinion, have deliberately downplayed the idea and suppressed, in fact, any discussion of a laboratory origin, you know, of COVID-19. | ||
| So I think going forward, we're going to have to look very carefully in terms of possible criminality. | ||
| of what they've been engaged in since this pandemic began. | ||
| Natalie, let me just jump in for a second. | ||
| I just got to ask about that Hugh Hewitt interview. | ||
| You know, Natalie is now starting to focus on Collins, who's really the head of NIH. | ||
| I mean, he's the grand poobah. | ||
| He gave a Hugh Hewitt interview that he said, listen, you know, just because the Chinese Communist Party has some affiliation or has some maybe knowledge of Wuhan, it doesn't mean that the scientists there, these scientists are among the best scientists in the world. | ||
| He made it seem like, you know, the CCP is like the Kiwanis Club or, you know, some local Well, the CCP knows that, and they're exploiting it. | ||
| You know, he's a useful idiot, this Dr. Collins, in my opinion. | ||
| So, you know, they've been doing this for 30 years now. | ||
| Hugh Hewitt, and that was the answer he gave. What say you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well the CCP knows that, and they're exploiting it. He's a useful idiot, this Dr. Collins, in my opinion. So they've been doing this for 30 years now. | |
| They've been sending PLA people, CCP scientists, into the United States to access knowledge and skills, sometimes intellectual property and then they've been exploiting our openness. | ||
| I think it's, you know, borders on sheer stupidity and negligence for anyone in that position to make those types of comments. | ||
| I'm just curious, you know, obviously what we're talking about here is gain-of-function research, all the mainstream media talking heads, the Dr. Fauci types will roll their eyes at people like me, people like you who attempt to understand and read the studies and really get to the bottom of what's going on here. | ||
| So how can the War Room audience push back against these, you know, kind of hard to comprehend at first scientific narratives that, you know, COVID-19 and spike proteins and the backbone of the virus and the natural reservoir. There's a lot of terms that at first glance might be difficult, but when you're talking about how the Chinese Communist Party has really infiltrated all of America's scientific community, how can the War Room audience, how can American patriots really push The way I'm looking at it, there's really three steps. | ||
| The first step is to make sure everyone understands that this comes from a laboratory, and they should be screaming that out loud. | ||
| we're hearing is just that, propaganda. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, they should do exactly what you just described. | |
| The way I'm looking at it, there's really three steps. | ||
| The first step is to make sure everyone understands that this comes from a laboratory and they should be screaming that out loud. | ||
| The second issue is to connect the COVID-19 to the People's Liberation Army who created this. | ||
| It was them who were overseeing all the laboratories that were working on developing a COVID-19 type of virus. | ||
| And the other issue, and I've raised this quite often, is that the PLA and the CCP have massively infiltrated U.S. | ||
| virus research programs. | ||
| I'm talking about universities, I'm talking about the National Institutes of Health, I'm talking about the CDC, and even some U.S. | ||
| Department of Defense laboratories have people in them as we speak who are CCP scientists or come from the People's Liberation Army. | ||
| I guess one last thing, real quick. | ||
| There's reports from Chinese state media that the Chinese government is constructing three more Biosafety Level 4 labs and 88 more Biosafety Level 3 labs. | ||
| What do you say to that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, they're shoving it in our faces or, you know, in our grills, as Steve liked to say. | |
| They're just lumbing their nose at it. | ||
| And until we put our foot down and, you know, pin this, you know, global tragedy on the PLA and on the CCP, they'll continue to go in that direction because what they see from this event is they succeeded. | ||
| They created a biological weapon. | ||
| It was distributed out throughout the world. | ||
| They've learned a lot about our responses to it, which have been poor to say the least. | ||
| And, you know, they see it as a learning experience. | ||
| So, you know, we have to take this to heart that these are very dangerous people. | ||
| And they have to be stopped. | ||
| Colonel Sellin, real quickly, how do people get to your Twitter feed? | ||
| Because it's a very informative Twitter feed. | ||
| People ought to be on it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, it's at Lawrence Sellin, my name, and it's updated daily of new information that we're getting. | |
| A lot of it is coming from Chinese-speaking anti-CCP young men and women who are very helpful. | ||
| So we're getting information from inside of China as well as from the scientific literature. | ||
| So I would recommend going there first and I do have a YouTube channel, which I sometimes post some videos. | ||
| We'll make sure everybody in the posse gets it. | ||
| Colonel Sullen, thank you very much. | ||
| This information about the expanded bioweapons program is going to shock the nation. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Dr. Navarro returns with Natalie Winters talking about Donald Trump's speech tonight in North Carolina about Dr. Fauci. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| We have not, as Dr. Fauci has actually said repeatedly, we've never approved any funding for gain-of-function research in Wuhan. | ||
| I know that's, I think, why you're asking the question. | ||
| I believe some may have been approved or there was funding approved during the prior administration. | ||
| There's a framework, I should say. | ||
| This is not meant to be a criticism of funding and how it's approved through different NIH programs, but I would send you to them to give more of an explanation of the funding mechanisms. | ||
| And just, since you mentioned Dr. Fauci again, can you imagine any circumstance where President Biden would ever fire him? | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Under no circumstances is going to fire Dr. Fauci. | ||
| We'll have to see if that one lasts. | ||
| By the way, we're going to have a clip later on about Chris Wallace from Fox News talking about how people like Natalie Winters and our next guest, Dr. Peter Navarro, politicizes so much you can't get a fair, Dr. Fauci can't get a fair hearing. | ||
| Look, I want to welcome the Real America's Voice audience from Samsung TV Plus. | ||
| Channel 1029, really honored to have you guys join. | ||
| Real America's Voice increases its distribution every day. | ||
| Also, GNews and GTV in Manor. | ||
| I want to thank Lao Bai Jing, all the great compliments we got the other night from all the Chinese people. | ||
| about the programming. We're here to support and assist your fight for freedom from the transnational criminal organization. This is the Chinese Communist Party. Also from our sponsor, very special, go to mypillow.com right now. After years of research and manufacturing expertise, they've now put forward the complete sleep system. You get 30% off by typing in promo code WARREN, 30% off. This is a specially made mattress. You get pillows, you get Giza sheets, 10-year warranty, six months money back guarantee if you don't love | ||
| it. So go there today, 30% off by typing in promo code WARREN. | ||
| The entire posse will go there today. | ||
| Natalie, I'm going to toss back to you. | ||
| You've got one of our favorite people in the world. | ||
| And what I'd like you guys to do is to talk. | ||
| President Trump's giving a speech tonight, the first one he's really given, at a convention of Republicans and MAGA faithful in North Carolina. | ||
| One of the central parts of the conversation, because of the work of Natalie Winters and because of the work of Dr. Peter Navarro, is Tony Fauci. | ||
| So Natalie, take it away. | ||
| You and Dr. Navarro, tell the nation what you guys think ought to be part of that speech. | ||
| Sure, well, I think as President Trump said in his inaugural address, he talked about American carnage. | ||
| And I think he should invoke that theme again tonight because that's exactly what we've seen happen as a result of this pandemic at the hands of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And if you remember what President Trump talked about in that speech, he talked about how there was essentially a redistribution of wealth from America's middle class to basically every other corner of the world, specifically China, right? | ||
| As we well know, the Chinese Communist Party has gotten rich off of the tax dollars of Americans. | ||
| And I think that there's no better example of this than what happened with regards to tens of millions of taxpayer dollars, right? | ||
| Over, I think it's about $130 million being funneled to groups like EcoHealth Alliance that have listed themselves not only as collaborators with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, an ardently Chinese Communist Party run organization, but even collaborated on risky science-based research with regards to gain of function and weaponization of viruses. | ||
| And despite, you know, the millions of taxpayer dollars that went to that lab, that went to Peter Doshak, what did American taxpayers get in return? | ||
| Nothing. | ||
| We should have spent that money on building the wall. | ||
| We should have spent that money building up cities, building up infrastructure, making America great again. | ||
| Instead we decided, not we the American people, but we the establishment decided to send money overseas to really help aid, frankly, the Chinese military in creating a virus that would ultimately tank our economy. | ||
| So that's what I would say President Trump should say tonight. | ||
| I'd be curious what you think, Dr. Navarro. | ||
| Buried lead, Steve and Natalie, on the Jen Psaki clip. | ||
| She is a stone-cold liar now, along with Tony Fauci, because she said to the American people that American taxpayers had not funded the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Now, here's the thing. | ||
| All you got to do is look at Natalie's fine research, but let's, Steve, if I give you some grant money, if I'm Fauci and I give you a bunch of grant money, right, here on U.S. | ||
| soil, and your name is Peter Daszak or Ralph Baric, and you Turn around and work with Natalie, who's over in the Wuhan lab, screwing around with horseshoe bat viruses, trying to figure out a way that they can kill people. | ||
| Have I not, have I not given money to the lab through an intermediary? | ||
| So, that is like, and the bat lady, the bat lady herself, memo to Jen Psaki, you stone cold friggin liar, The bat lady herself, Shi Zhen Li, who did the gain-of-function experiments which unleashed this pandemic on the world, thanked Dr. Anthony Fauci by name in one of her journal articles for funding her research. | ||
| Jen Psaki, you are a stone-cold liar. | ||
| Now, here's what I think's got to happen tonight, Steve. | ||
| The boss is going to go after Fauci. | ||
| There's going to be some righteous indignation and anger. | ||
| Yes, but there's got to be a portion of the speech where he basically cribs the Natalie Winters Raheem Kassam National Pulse notes and goes over the timeline. | ||
| And what's been bothering me now ever since these emails have been released is this. | ||
| Steve, you and I knew the moment we saw the crematorious smoke in Wuhan That there was going to be a pandemic. | ||
| You were brilliant enough to actually have a show in January 2020 which you named Pandemic, right? | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So if you and I, layperson, you from that trade school across the river at Harvard, me with my PhD, but neither one of us scientists, right? | ||
| If we know there's a pandemic on the way, what the heck do you think Tony Fauci knew the moment he heard that news when he knew That he had sent grant money over to the Wuhan lab and went behind the back of the Trump administration to reinstate gain-of-function research experiments that Barrack | ||
| And Dasik could do in conjunction with the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Fauci, you are a Stone Cold liar. | ||
| You can't say that you didn't support gain-of-function at the Wuhan lab or gave money there. | ||
| If you gave it to Dasik and Beric, you gave it to the lab. | ||
| And let's remember, the bat lady thanked you for the money. | ||
| So here's what the boss... I think what the boss needs to say is, look, that little twerp came into the oval Like a hundred times during that crisis, and never did he once look me in the eye and say, you know, I think it might have come from that lab and it might have been genetically engineered. | ||
| See, if I had known that, if I had known that in February, when I was trying to figure out how to get masks and gloves and vaccines and therapeutics to the American people, it would have changed my world. | ||
| We would have had a totally different strategy. | ||
| So what the boss has to do, there's got to be a portion of the speech where he goes over the timeline of what Tony Fauci knew, when he knew it, and what he didn't tell the President of the United States about that, and what Fauci did not tell the American people. | ||
| Fauci, look, this is very simple. | ||
| Chris Wallace, one last thing. | ||
| Chris, I'm here, baby. | ||
| Do not defend Tony Fauci, okay? | ||
| You are on quicksand if you defend that guy, and I'm ready to go on your show any time and have that conversation. | ||
| Okay, I'm going to get back to that in a second. | ||
| That's important. | ||
| I want to go to Natalie, though. | ||
| Natalie, Navar just laid it out. | ||
| You know, get away from the rhetoric. | ||
| If you had to give the President two or three points in your research and investigation, the President should include tonight, about Fauci's culpability and Fauci letting down the American people, what would you put in there? | ||
| What would you tell the speechwriters to definitely plug in there? | ||
| One, that gain-of-function research, which is of course the form of research that most likely led to this pandemic in the first place, has no stronger advocate, no stronger supporter than an individual named Dr. Fauci. | ||
| But when you couple that with the fact, and we've done extensive reporting on this at the National Pulse, Whether it's about the NIH inviting the Deputy Director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to come up there and speak about how there's quote no regulation of this dangerous form of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology or we have leaked cables about how the Wuhan lab has just dismal safety protocols and safety measures. | ||
| He needs to hammer why Anthony Fauci still allowed hard-earned taxpayer dollars to fund this lab that had this horrible track record and even bigger picture funded a lab that had such distinct ties to the Chinese Communist Party. I'd also love to hear the name Peter Doshak come out of President Trump's mouth. I think that would be awesome and really nail down EcoHealth Alliance because Peter Doshak may think that he doesn't have to answer to congressional inquiries | ||
| for his finances and information about the kind of research they were conducting or even tell daily mail photographers who were at his house yesterday that they need to leave and get off his property because he doesn't have to answer for the role that he played in potentially creating a very very deadly virus that has just destroyed the global economy. | ||
| Well, you know who he does have to answer to? | ||
| Donald Trump. | ||
| And I'm pretty sure that if Donald Trump says the name Peter Doshak, that That'll just kind of intensify all the reporting and the interest that we have on this individual who is so critical, so crucial, a friend of Anthony Fauci's in this whole pandemic. | ||
| Let me say one thing here, Steve. | ||
| Look, for the boss, look, boss, the most important thing in all of this is the fact that Fauci was not honest with you in the Oval. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Above all, an advisor has to be honest to the President in the Oval Office. | ||
| And from the very beginning, we know from the emails now that have been uncovered, we know that as early as January 29th, This guy Christian at Scripps Research Institute said that this virus likely was genetically engineered. | ||
| And therefore, it must have come from the lab, okay? | ||
| So as early as the end of January, when the President was struggling with whether or not to do the travel ban, Fauci, from the get-go, was not... That's what this is all about, Steve. | ||
| That's the key point. | ||
| Fauci lied by omission to the American President. | ||
| The other buried lead here in the email flow is hydroxychloroquine. | ||
| If you look at the emails that Fauci got, there was a beautiful email from a highly respected doctor who said hydroxychloroquine worked, and Fauci blew that off. | ||
| So the boss needs to go, I think, at that. | ||
| Natalie, just give me like three emails the boss can point to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Which makes the point that... I tell you what, Peter, let's hold that. | |
| I want Natalie to hold that and we're going to do that in the other break because I want to take this to break and give you time. | ||
| Also, after the break, I want you to answer the question about the $10 trillion, right? | ||
| President Trump brought that up, so I want to get to Natalie's three emails. | ||
| One thing I want to say though, what Peter Navarro just said, and this is because we know that the Biden White House says people watch and monitor the show. | ||
| We are highly partisan. | ||
| We admit that. | ||
| We're the voice of the MAGA movement. | ||
| This platform is all about MAGA, all about American first, but for the good of the American people should take to heart what Dr. Peter Navarro said. | ||
| When this virus first started, it was obviously come together and try to solve it. | ||
| Anthony Fauci, at best, misled people, and I think actively misled people for the good of the country. | ||
| The Biden administration, I think, should cut ties with Anthony Fauci and cut him loose. | ||
| And I actually think Dr. Collins, too. | ||
| I think there needs a complete deep investigation. | ||
| Look, it's going to come. | ||
| We take over the House in 2022. | ||
| The investigation, all this is going to be monumental. | ||
| This is one of the biggest scandals in American history, because President Trump's saying, hey, it's 10 trillion dollars, which I think Navarro and I are saying, President, that's a little light. | ||
| But even at $10 trillion, it's the biggest scandal that's ever affected the American economy. | ||
| And Tony Fauci needs to be let go by the Biden administration today. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to return. | ||
| We've got Natalie Winters from National Pulse as our host, Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| We're drilling down on the President's speech tonight. | ||
| Then we're going to go to Georgia in the second hour of the show and also talk about the new UFO report coming out in a couple of weeks. | ||
| All next in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I mean, I guess I would say this. | ||
| I've read reports and read through a number of the emails. | ||
| There's no smoking gun there that indicates that Fauci had any reason to believe that this had come from the laboratories, from the Wuhan virology laboratory. | ||
| And this is, I'll answer the question even though Jen Psaki wouldn't. | ||
| This is highly political. | ||
| I can promise you that you're seeing it as a major talking point from Republicans. | ||
| I think that when Donald Trump speaks tomorrow night in North Carolina, you're going to see him go after Fauci. | ||
| Let's just remember, Anthony Fauci has been on the firing lines trying to protect Americans from public health issues since the mid-80s with AIDS. | ||
| And before we start calling for his head, this guy who's been a devoted public servant for 40 years, maybe we ought to slow down just a little bit. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| I can't stand any more nonsense. | ||
| First of all, it shows you what an airhead Chris Wallace is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Deliver me from evil. | |
| Deliver me from evil, Steve. | ||
| That is evil. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| That's evil. | ||
| Go ahead, Steve. | ||
| No, no, you take it. | ||
| No, go ahead. | ||
| I'm saying how dumb. | ||
| It's embarrassment for Chris Wallace because he's a moron. | ||
| His staff didn't prep him. | ||
| And no offense, John Roberts, dude, you've got to be able to push back on that. | ||
| I realize the guy. | ||
| How Fox has that guy as their number one Sunday show is a disgrace. | ||
| But what are your thoughts about Chris Wallace? | ||
| I don't want to ask Natalie Winters for the receipts. | ||
| That was evil, Steve. | ||
| If Natalie Winters had been sitting in that chair, this is what She would have hit him with, okay? | ||
| Wallace says he's gone through the emails and found no smoking gun. | ||
| Here's your smoking gun, okay? | ||
| This is an email that was on The National Pulse that Natalie Winters wrote about from Christian G. Anderson, Mr. Wallace, Scripps Research Institute, Mr. Wallace, emailed to Fauci, January 31, 2020. | ||
| You got three points here. | ||
| Horseshoe bats serve as the reservoir or backbone of SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| Translation for the layperson, the horseshoe bats curated at the lab in Wuhan were used as the genetic material To be augmented through gain-of-function experimentation and weaponization, bullet number one. | ||
| Number two, this guy Anderson says, some of the unusual features look engineered, okay? | ||
| And bullet number three, you got four of these guys, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and Christian there, all find the genome inconsistent. | ||
| With the expectations from evolutionary theory. | ||
| That's only one email, Chris Wallace. | ||
| Read that friggin' email, and then look the American people in the eye, and say that Tony Fauci's a good public servant. | ||
| That's the smoking gun right there, and there's plenty more in those emails. | ||
| Do your homework, boys, and John Roberts, push back, okay? | ||
| It's like, I'm just sick of this mainstream media that doesn't do their homework, and it's one thing for CNN to And MSNBC to have Fauci's back, but when Fox is doing it, like, this is the biggest story in history, okay? | ||
| This guy used American taxpayer money, backdoored the White House to get gain-of-function experimentation re-approved when everybody knew it was dangerous, and wound up causing a pandemic, and then he hid the pandemic from the world, from the president, he was totally dis- this is not a public servant who's honest and loyal. | ||
| Natalie, what would you give Chris Wallace? | ||
| You know, in terms of the emails to... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well... | |
| Go ahead. | ||
| No, I'm... | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, give us your thoughts. | |
| Give us your thoughts, Natalie. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Well, I think when you compare and contrast what you saw on Fox with regards to what Anthony Fauci said also while he was being questioned by Senator Rand Paul, right? | ||
| He totally distanced himself from gain-of-function research. | ||
| He totally distanced himself from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| So if you take Fauci at his words, right, on that day when he was testifying in the Senate, what you see in the emails, and might I add, what you see in the unredacted emails, right, we don't even have access to A, all of his correspondence, but B, they've also redacted certainly some interesting emails that have very interesting subjects in the headline or interesting senders. | ||
| But believe it or not, there's no conspiracies, but there are coincidences in politics, I guess. | ||
| But the last three emails of the entire document dump, which is over 3,000 pages of emails, have to do with gain of function. | ||
| Research have to do with kind of a potential origin of COVID-19 that didn't have to do with nature or with bats. | ||
| Specifically, he even says, he being Fauci, says gain of function in an email where you see one of these NIH NIAID deputies corresponding just posing the question about if gain-of-function research in China in these p3 p4 lab facilities could have potentially you know created or just played a role or had any relevance to this virus | ||
| But when people like me and you and Steve and Dr. Navarro, when we pose these questions, we're called crazy. | ||
| We're called conspiracy theorists. | ||
| And like I said, the emails that I'm mentioning, those are just three of over 3,000 emails. | ||
| And I also, too, I think that my favorite part of this whole email dump is how Dr. Fauci may not have had time to respond to people who are warning him. | ||
| Like you said, Dr. Navarro, about the potential manipulation and you know, lab origins of this virus. But he had time to respond almost instantaneously to anyone who was emailing him to praise his work, to denigrate President Trump, to attack him. So this I think really shows you about the psychology of Dr. Fauci. And really, to me, I think that there's a lot of similarities between him and some of these impeachment witnesses that you saw in the first impeachment | ||
| President Trump. They pretend to support him. | ||
| They pretend to be an ally publicly. | ||
| The media parade them around like that. | ||
| But behind the scenes, they're doing everything they can to actively undermine. | ||
| Amen. | ||
| Okay, Peter, real quickly. | ||
| Were you talking about Chris Wallace or Fauci, by the way? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Many contenders. | |
| Peter, real quickly, what's your social media? | ||
| How do people get to you? | ||
| We've got to bounce. | ||
| PeterNavarro.com and RealPNavarro at the social censor otherwise known as Twitter. | ||
| You're the key that picks the lock here, Navarro, so just take care of yourself. | ||
| Stay healthy. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Natalie Winters and I are going to return in the War Room. | ||
| We're going to return in the War Room. | ||
| We're going to go to Georgia. | ||
| Big convention down there. | ||
| All of the posse of the War Room in Georgia. | ||
| They've signed up to be committeemen. | ||
| They're now down there at the convention. | ||
| They're raising hell, as they should. | ||
| A lot going on. | ||
| Vernon Jones, John Fredericks, Bernie Kerrick, all of them are going to get to it as soon as we return in the War Room. |
Export Selection