May 24, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
46:28
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The virus has now killed more than 100 people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | |
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back to The War Room. | ||
| Almost 55 million downloads on the podcast. | ||
| Of course, we're live everywhere on radio with John Fredericks, Radio Network, Real America's Voice, the streaming service, up on DISH, on the satellite, DISH Channel 219, on cable, Comcast 113, of course, Roku, Pluto, Telegram, Rumble, everywhere, and most importantly, | ||
| Live in Mandarin on GNewsGTV, and later in the day, blown through the firewall for Lao-Bai Jing, the deplorables of China that yearn to be free, and we offer an assist in their fight for freedom against the transnational criminal organization that is the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| A lot about that later in the show. | ||
| We got Jim Hoff, we got Colonel Sullen, and we also have General Arbuckle getting into all of that. | ||
| I want to turn now... And most importantly, subscribe, leave a comment, leave a review, and make sure you share it with other people. | ||
| This show is powered by you. | ||
| Okay, exactly. | ||
| The reason this show's got power is you. | ||
| You're the force multipliers. | ||
| And I want to thank... by the way, I haven't done any... I'm so excited about today. | ||
| So much great news that even I got caught up in this. | ||
| I haven't done any reads. | ||
| MyPillow.com. | ||
| Mike Lindell, the armor-piercing shell, is going to be on tomorrow, live here at 10 o'clock. | ||
| He's got a lot to report. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Type in promo code WARROOM. | ||
| The pillows, $40 off. | ||
| The queen size, $29.98. | ||
| This is not going to last forever. | ||
| Okay, so make sure you go to that. | ||
| You get the Giza Dream Sheets. | ||
| You got the slippers and the moccasins, which Rahim wears non-stop. | ||
| MyPillow.com. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| Support the great manufacturing company up in Minnesota. | ||
| Support Mike Lindell, the armor piercing show. | ||
| And of course, the apparatus of War Room by typing in promo code WARROOM to get your discounts. | ||
| Make sure you do it. | ||
| Particularly get focused on those pillows. | ||
| Okay, one of the things we try to do on this platform is introduce you to this rising generation of killers, of people that are not going to back off, that are very smart, very tough, okay? | ||
| Because this is what this movement's about. | ||
| Not just the boomers, right? | ||
| It's a fourth turning. | ||
| You've got to look at these new generations, people you've never heard of before. | ||
| Jack Francis, I want everybody to subscribe to his YouTube. | ||
| I want everybody to go on his Twitter and sign up. | ||
| You've got to follow his Twitter account. | ||
| Do you agree with my theory of the case, that what we're seeing, and the reason we're covering this from Arizona to Georgia to Florida to all over, is that you're seeing the buildup from these school boards, that parents, particularly mothers, are thrown down on masks, on forced vaccinations, on the teaching of critical race theory, till you see the military and these generals and these veterans, and you see people going out with Dan Schultz, the West Point grad, on the precinctstrategy.com. | ||
| Everybody go there today to sign up to be a Yeah, I actually think that it's going to make the Tea Party look like an actual Tea Party by comparison. | ||
| 2010 historic Tea Party sweep. Do you believe that in your analysis, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I actually think that it's gonna make the Tea Party look like an actual Tea Party by comparison. | |
| I mean you look at what's happening in not just you know, we saw what happened in Texas, not just in that one congressional district, but the school boards in Fort Worth and Dallas were a sweep for the Republicans at rates that we haven't seen in a long time. | ||
| If you look at what's happened in Pennsylvania. | ||
| Where by five points, the state voted to restrict the governor's powers. | ||
| The energy factor is on the Republican side, especially on the America First side of the Republican Party. | ||
| And you look at the early vote out of New Mexico's first special election so far, Democrats are vastly underperforming where they need to be. | ||
| So it is possible Republicans could even flip a seat where Democrats won in the 2020 election by 23 points. | ||
| I want to go back to Pennsylvania and some of the analysis you've done there in this primary, I guess it was, across the board. | ||
| Are you seeing a real groundswell of America First coming out, of MAGA Nation really coming out to these kind of off-year primaries, these off-year elections? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| You're seeing it in Pennsylvania. | ||
| A lot of the people that turned out were, I mean, obviously Trump voters in the rural areas, they kind of helped push the initiative over. | ||
| A lot of legacy Democrats voted to restrict the Democrat governor who won by like 15 points in 2018's powers. | ||
| So you are seeing this. | ||
| And even in the state of Texas, in the sixth special election, you saw massive turnout, not just in Tarrant County, around Fort Worth and the suburbs. | ||
| But also in the more, you know, working class excerpts among, you know, Trump's base. | ||
| So you're seeing Trump's base turn out at high numbers for a midterm election. | ||
| A lot of Democrats and these, you know, expert predictors that I like to call the election prediction mafia, they were saying, well, Trump's voters have a, you know, a lower attainment of education on average, so they're not going to turn out. | ||
| Well, that doesn't exactly seem to be the case, because they seem more energized than I've really ever seen, and Democrats just seem a little bit apathetic to vote, so you may see a massive red wave next fall. | ||
| Correct me if I'm wrong, as I read your analysis, you also are saying that you're seeing the beginning of really a MAGA, of kind of policies people support, or they're not just falling for the old GOP playbook of free trade, tax cuts, Across the board, you're seeing something more sophisticated when it comes to MAGA. | ||
| The people really understand that there's got to be a policy shift. | ||
| And in that, you're seeing a realignment, whether it's in the Hispanic working class in the Rio Grande Valley or in South Texas. | ||
| Explain that to the audience. | ||
| What are you seeing out there about really a serious people understanding the policy differences and just not going back to the kind of Cheney, Bush, Republican Party of the past? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you have to look at the things that made Donald Trump's 2016 campaign special. | |
| He wasn't just your standard Republican. | ||
| He ran against free trade. | ||
| He ran on ending the wars overseas. | ||
| He ran against the establishment. | ||
| He ran against big business, which really is not our friend if you look at all of this woke nonsense that they're pushing. | ||
| So my idea is that the Republican Party has to look at these places like South Texas, Like places in the Midwest like Michigan and try to relate to getting more workers who are culturally conservative on their side by making the appeal to them directly instead of just the traditional donor appeal to the suburbs because those have been moving away from Republicans for years now and it doesn't look like they're coming back so they need to actually strategize on how to bring new voters over to their side that potentially could. | ||
| Um, because it seems like a lot of voters, like you talk about the suburbs and free trade and Democrats are becoming the party of the elite and they've actually become the party of the elite. | ||
| The Republicans have to become the party, the populist party. | ||
| They have to become the party of the American worker. | ||
| And I think with Trump, we kind of saw this, you know. | ||
| Rising tide of populism that we kind of saw with the Tea Party, but like on steroids. | ||
| And I think in the future, you're going to see even more anti-establishment candidates, primary out incumbents, and take office. | ||
| And I think 2022 can lay the groundwork for that. | ||
| Jack, so once again, how can people get to you? | ||
| Your Twitter account, the YouTube, it's all free. | ||
| You just got to go. | ||
| How do people get access to your analysis on a timely basis? | ||
|
unidentified
|
My Twitter account is at Red Eagle Patriot and my YouTube is Red Eagle Politics. | |
| They can find it by looking it up on the YouTube search bar. | ||
| Jack, thank you very much. | ||
| Everybody go there. | ||
| We'll have you back on. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| Welcome to the show and glad you came on. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Thanks for having me. | ||
| You've got Natalie Winters, you've got the Jack Francis's. | ||
| It's deep. | ||
| We've got a deep and incredible talent pool. | ||
| Amazing talent pool. | ||
| And we're going to use this as a platform to make sure we showcase all that incredible talent. | ||
| I want to bring in now a hero, a Vietnam vet, one of the top leaders in the Army before he retired, General Joseph Arbuckle. | ||
| General, thank you very much for joining us here on The War Room today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for all the great work you're doing. | |
| Well, sir, it's actually, it's easy. | ||
| Just all we got to do is give a platform to guys like yourself. | ||
| Now, I want to go back. | ||
| We've got a couple of minutes in this segment. | ||
| I'll hold you over the next. | ||
| There was a letter that came out that we made a big deal about in, I think, September, late September, early October of 2020. | ||
| It was from, I think, 300 and some flag officers, generals and admirals that served their country, that warned that the 2020 election was the most important election in the history of the Republic. | ||
| Because with all the indications you saw from not just Joe Biden, but all the kind of radicals that were supporting him, that the country would go in a very different direction. | ||
| Are you familiar with that letter, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, quite familiar with it. | |
| History goes back actually to the 2016 time frame when Trump was running for election and a retired Major General named Sid Schach now sent an email out to a bunch of retirees and asked If we would sign a letter in support of President Trump's election at that time. | ||
| And I signed it. | ||
| So fast forward to last summer. | ||
| And at that time, there were some very prominent four stars who went public making statements against the then sitting President Trump, to include former Secretary Mattis and a handful of others. | ||
| That caused me concern because it was creating a false narrative, I thought. | ||
| That a majority or at least a large number of retired generals and admirals shared that same opinion. | ||
| So I sent an email to Sid Schach now and said, Hey, Sid, this is going on. | ||
| Why don't you consider sending out another letter in support of Trump's reelection? | ||
| Again, this was last summer into early fall. | ||
| Didn't hear anything back, so I followed up. | ||
| Still nothing. | ||
| And finally I got a response from A lady who worked with Sid previously as an executive officer. | ||
| And she said, sorry to tell you, Sid's dead. | ||
| And at that point, there was a bunch of dialogue between us. | ||
| And finally, she asked me if I would pick up the ball and kind of initiate that back in September. | ||
| And I said, okay, finally, I'll do that. | ||
| And we sent that letter out you just referenced. | ||
| And in the end, we got 317 retired generals and admirals to sign that letter. | ||
| In support of President Trump's, then President Trump's, re-election. | ||
| The power of that letter, it was a called shot. | ||
| I mean, you warned America exactly when you heard all this happy talk in the media and all this spin. | ||
| You actually laid out pretty systematically exactly what was going to happen. | ||
| And then about a hundred days into Biden's administration, you came out with this letter a couple weeks ago. | ||
| 124 generals and admirals signed it. | ||
| We actually had a special, I think two Saturdays ago, called the American Generals Talk with a couple of the senior General Boykins, Harrell, and Bodick on. | ||
| But walk us through that letter, which is actually a follow-on from your earlier letter where you warned the nation, now you said, hey, this has happened, and here's the jam we're in. | ||
| Walk us through that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, that occurred because I became increasingly concerned about what was going on after the inauguration, the speed at which we're marching down, actually running down that road to socialism and Marxism. | |
| So I sat down with a piece of paper and identified the greatest national security issues I thought were relevant at the time and tied them together with some narrative to connect the dots. | ||
| And work with our little team. | ||
| And again, there's only three of us doing this. | ||
| I think the perception may be it's a much bigger deal, but it's not. | ||
| It's two wonderful volunteer ladies back on the East Coast. | ||
| So we took this letter, and I asked for comments from other people, got some input, made some adjustments, and finalized it. | ||
| And sent it out to a group of retired generals and admirals again, and asked them if they would be willing to sign it. | ||
| I went out on the 26th of April, and we got initially 100 up to 120. | ||
| And then we decided to release the information through a press release. | ||
| And today we have 162 retired flags that have signed that letter. | ||
| And basically, the overarching theme, as you know, I believe, is that the nation must be proud. | ||
| That's the first sentence. | ||
| Because instead of upholding our Constitution, And all that it represents, we're doing the opposite by going down this path into socialism and Marxism. | ||
| And that was the most alarming thing. | ||
| And then identified in the letter, key points that back that up, such as we need to have fair and honest elections, one vote per citizen, one vote counted. | ||
| And then we got into other areas such as border security. | ||
| Ted, we just lost General Arbuckle. | ||
| I'll tell you what, let's go to break. | ||
| Let's fix the audio problem and we'll come back. | ||
| Stephen K. Bannon, you're in the War Room. | ||
| We're going to return in a moment with General Joseph Arbuckle. | ||
| We've got Jim Hoff and we also have Colonel Sullen. | ||
| All next in the War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| General Arbuckle, we're going to have you back on when we spend more time going through this. | ||
| There's so much breaking news today, but I've got to ask a question before we figure out how the War Room Posse can help you. | ||
| Your warning shot in September was a called shot, okay? | ||
| You can read that letter back then. | ||
| We played it up for days and days and days. | ||
| It was a called shot about exactly what was going to happen. | ||
| Your letter A hundred days into the Biden administration was a warning of here's how far off track we are and here's how rapidly we're heading down this path of cultural Marxism and all these other issues. | ||
| Breaking of our sovereignty. | ||
| We're not conspiracy theorists here. | ||
| We say in fact there are no conspiracies. | ||
| You look at Davos, but there are no coincidences. | ||
| I think, particularly for veterans, You look at what's going on, and we couldn't be moving this far down, particularly the radical, you know, we're going to have Colonel Lohmeyer in this week, in the studio. | ||
| Irresistible Revolution is a great book on the cultural Marxist takeover of the military. | ||
| You could not have all these aspects that you lay out in the letter, from the border, to national security, to what's happening to the military, to the problems in democracy, actually getting to the bottom of a free election on November 3rd, what actually happened. | ||
| All the issues with the Wuhan lab and not even being able to address this. | ||
| You couldn't have all this happen. | ||
| Unless you have active participation in what I call the administrative state. | ||
| I'm not a deep state guy. | ||
| The administrative state. | ||
| There has to be so many people in the national security apparatus, in the intelligence apparatus, and quite frankly, in not just DOD, but our beloved military. | ||
| I'm a former naval officer. | ||
| My daughter's a West Point grad. | ||
| She's Army. | ||
| I know you're Army. | ||
| But there's obviously not just active engagement. | ||
| There's active working. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Biden couldn't be. | |
| He's kind of this hapless, feckless old man kind of wandering around, right? | ||
| So how did we get in a situation that the apparatus of the national security, national intelligence, military, DOD, all of it, right, seems to be pushing us in a certain direction, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, good question, Steve. | |
| I'll give you my opinion, and it's kind of twofold. | ||
| One is, it didn't happen overnight. | ||
| This has been coming on for many, many years. | ||
| In fact, the political correctness culture has been infused in the military going back to the Clinton administration and has continued pretty much since. | ||
| And so that's been embedded, I think, as we go along with social experimentation and rapidly accelerated under the Obama administration, in my view, and especially now. | ||
| And we have to recognize, of course, that the military is controlled by The civilian side, political appointees, primarily starting with the Department of Defense, and actually up to the Commander-in-Chief, the President. | ||
| And so the political appointees are in the key positions there. | ||
| And there's always a debate within the military ranks of uniformed members about civilian control, which we obviously honor, but also about the political policies they bring, such as this socialism and cultural Marxism. | ||
| And Those that don't agree with that sort of an approach to our military in terms of the active duty, they're given a choice. | ||
| You either accept it or you resign. | ||
| Speaking out against it, as we saw with Colonel Lohmeyer here recently, is not tolerated very well and hasn't been in the past. | ||
| And so I think there's been a slow, gradual, over many years, purging of the ranks as more and more of the social engineering and these politically correct policies have been Entrenched into our military. | ||
| Do you believe, as we sit here today, we've actually purged, already purged, a good portion of a generation, entire generation of warfighters that will never get to, will never see their abilities as flag officers, that they were purged at field grade or below, these great warfighters, because they would not go along with this radical change in the uniformed services of cultural Marxism? | ||
|
unidentified
|
My gut feel is no, I don't think it's that large, Steve. | |
| Now, certainly there's been some number, but what I'm really concerned about today is that happening right now as a result of what's going on with this appointment by Bishop Garrison into the position he has right now, basically a close advisor to the Secretary of Defense and to that diversity, equality and inclusion Uh, effort that's going on. | ||
| That's going to drive a lot, in my opinion, of the active duty people away. | ||
| And it's also going to hurt enlistments. | ||
| In fact, I've received phone calls and emails from close friends whose kids and their grandkids are considering coming into the military and asking me, what do we do in the face of this climate in the military today? | ||
| I've got to tell you, that's a tough question for me to answer, honestly, because it's not going to be a pleasant environment unless we can get this stopped. | ||
| I want to thank Darren Beattie and the team over at revolver.news for doing the great analysis and investigative reporting on Bishop Garrison and this radical cultural Marxism being infused in our military. | ||
| General Arbuckle, we're going to have you back on in the near future, but I've got to ask you before you go, how can we have so many veterans in this audience, so many parents of veterans, parents of active duty people, how can the apparatus of the war room assist Now 162 flag officers of, I think it was Flags for America. | ||
| Give us your site, but how can people assist and help you and you great patriots as you stand up and really, you know, put your reputations and everything online because you're going to be torn apart. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| How can this audience assist you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, the site, Steve, you're correct, is FlagOfficers4America.com and there's some good information on that. | |
| Specifically, I think there's two things to that. | ||
| One is, I'm working on a little template for citizens to get involved right now. | ||
| And it's going to focus on the local level, obviously, because grassroots is where change really starts to happen. | ||
| And it's going to offer citizens some ideas on what they can do to get involved and make a difference. | ||
| Now, in terms of our effort, I guess basically just coverage like you're providing, visibility, On the issues that we've identified in the flag letter. | ||
| And there's there's no direct support in terms of any organization that can be pushed. | ||
| So I guess continued coverage in the media is a bottom line answer. | ||
| And people can also express their concerns about where the military is headed and where our country is headed in general. | ||
| The local political representatives, that's always an option there and should be Well, General, we're a platform and an apparatus for you, your heroes and your patriots. | ||
| So we're getting more into this in the days and weeks ahead. | ||
| General Joseph Arbuckle, a patriot that served his country for many, many decades, and now in his retirement has come back like Cincinnatus from his field to help save his country again. | ||
| I can't thank you enough, sir, for your heroism and bravery. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| It's a fine fix we're in. | ||
| We've got retired generals and admirals that have already served their country and should be in the years when they're enjoying their grandkids and everything like that, that they've got to come back and be the tip of the spear to fight this. | ||
| But this is the jam that we're in. | ||
| This is the jam that we're in. | ||
| And I don't want to harp on the failures of the Bush-Cheney apparatus, but when General Auerbach says it started in the Clinton administration, it got worse in Obama, what happened in those years? | ||
| of Cheney Bush. | ||
| I don't feel any reversal of fortune there. | ||
| Rahim Ghassan. | ||
| So just as a matter of philosophical note on this, this is one of the problems with not having a continuation of generational information and struggle, really. | ||
| You know, you don't have, and not to say that we have in the United Kingdom either, but you don't have a monarchy, right? | ||
| I don't think that we have a monarchy either. | ||
| We have a celebrity family now that's supposedly a royal family, right? | ||
| So how do you tie people to the struggles of the last generation and perhaps the generation before that to make sure that information is not lost and information is kept and that it's not erased or swept away every time? | ||
| Please, you're not pitching the monarchy, are you? | ||
| I'm pitching a monarchy. | ||
| I'm not pitching our monarchy. | ||
| God, man. | ||
| Remember, I'm an Irish Republican. | ||
| You have a monarchy in this country. | ||
| It's your bureaucracy. | ||
| No, it's not a monarchy. | ||
| That's an aristocracy. | ||
| Right, but the only institutional knowledge that ever gets passed down It's through the bureaucracy right now. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And that's why the Bishop Garrison stories are so important. | ||
| It's because it's the institutions that pass the information down. | ||
| And unfortunately, as you say, then it has to take people out of their lives and out of their retirement, as hard as they've worked all their lives, to come back and fix this. | ||
| I totally agree with you. | ||
| The administrative state is all powerful. | ||
| That's where we're trying to take it apart brick by brick. | ||
| Can I play the Fauci? | ||
| Do we have enough time to play Fauci? | ||
| Let's play Fauci. | ||
| We're going to introduce Jim Hoft. | ||
| By playing we can't play falchion so back to Monarchy. It's not it's two minutes long though, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I had to, it's like 2.30. | |
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Well, let's bring in Jim Hoff in. | ||
| Yeah, let's bring Jim Hoff in. | ||
| We got Jim from the Great Gateway Pundit. | ||
| Jim, we're going to play actually the Fauci piece from your analysis. | ||
| But tee up, I think your headline is, we've got a rat cornered. | ||
| I forgot. | ||
| It was a quite sensational headline. | ||
| What point were you making about Dr. Fauci and what's happened over the weekend? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Rat in a trap. | |
| That's actually our headline, Steve. | ||
| And it's very appropriate. | ||
| Dr. Fauci finally was asked about Rand Paul's comments during testimony, and he admits in a PolitiFact interview, which who knew that PolitiFact was doing interviews now? | ||
| PolitiFact for the past year has lied too, Steve. | ||
| They have been giving strikes to anyone who said that this virus was uh... that it was cost from lab work right yeah so not all this time the past week they change their chair in the meantime because they can't wait to answer that you're a chaser to jim because the lawyers are talking to him right there chant changer to hey you can try to get this wasn't an editorial Yeah, this is not an editorial discussion. | ||
| This is a legal discussion. | ||
| They're trying to get ahead of this. | ||
| Listen, we got the whole list, chapter and verse of all you guys. | ||
| So don't think you're going to run from all the lies and misrepresentation. | ||
| Jim, why don't you hang on a second? | ||
| Let us take a commercial break, pay some bills. | ||
| We're going to come back. | ||
| We'll have the cold open. | ||
| We'll have Jim Hoff join us. | ||
| Also, Colonel Selin. | ||
| He's got even more breaking news that you think it's bad, you don't even know how bad it is until Colonel Sullen gets here. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| Jim Hoff, Colonel Sullen, and the War Room Posse, next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| We're getting information out. | ||
| All right, well, there's one moment in particular that's already making some headlines and I wanted to run it by you for additional comment. | ||
| And that was Senator Rand Paul. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, that's actually preposterous. | ||
| And I mean, to bring something that up is really not helpful. | ||
| the NIH funded risky research that eventually down the line connected to COVID-19. I don't want to dwell on this for too long, but I did want to give you that chance to react to his comments today. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, that's actually preposterous. And I mean, to bring something that up is really not helpful. He was saying we funded a kind of research in China, that could lead to dangerous research. | ||
| That's not the case. | ||
| So what he was saying was just absolutely not true. | ||
| It's really unfortunate that he brought that up. | ||
| It really does nothing but cloud the issue of what we're trying to do. | ||
| So it was just, you know, unfortunate that he said that. | ||
| It was said in an accusatory way that just made no sense and was not based on any fact at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That has been the subject of a lot of our fact checking on the coronavirus for the past year. | |
| And like you said, there's a lot of cloudiness around the origins of COVID-19 still. | ||
| So I wanted to ask, are you still confident that it developed naturally? | ||
| No, actually, that's the point that I said. | ||
| And I think the real Unfortunate aspect of what Senator Paul did is he was conflating research in a collaborative way with Chinese scientists, which was, you know, you'd almost have to say if we did not do that, we would almost be irresponsible because SARS COVID-1 clearly originated in China, and we were fortunate to escape a major pandemic. | ||
| So we really had to learn a lot more about the viruses that were there, about whether or not people were getting infected with bad viruses. | ||
| So in a very minor collaboration, as part of a subcontract of a grant, we had a collaboration with some Chinese scientists. | ||
| And what he conflated that is that therefore we were involved in creating the virus, which is the most ridiculous majestic leap I've ever heard of. | ||
| But no, I'm not convinced about that. | ||
| I think that we should continue to investigate What went on in China until we find out, to the best of our ability, exactly what happened? | ||
| Certainly, the people who've investigated say that it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir. | ||
| Let's go and stop. | ||
| Let's go and stop. | ||
| The Gateway Pundit, the great Jim Hoffman, his brother Joe, rat in a trap. | ||
| That is lies, spin, misrepresentation, and political fact. | ||
| Hey, you're legally on the hook, okay? | ||
| You can do all the spin you want now, ask all the questions you want now. | ||
| We kept it all. | ||
| From everybody, okay? | ||
| We started this show back on, what, January 23rd of 2020? | ||
| the very first guest on the very first day we talked about Wuhan lab we talked about the gain of function experiments we had Bill Gertz next day Washington Post, Democracy Dies in Darkness, Washington Post, talked about conspiracy theories, wingnuts, marginal, no no no no no no no no no no we're going to get to the bottom of the truth. | ||
| Now today, the Wall Street Journal's got a big story over the weekend about the people getting sick in the lab back in November. | ||
| We talked about this the first week, the third week of January 2020. | ||
| And then we had Dr. Li Min Yan on, talked about it extensively, about her communications with Beijing CDC, guess when? | ||
| On New Year's Eve of 2019, about what was going on and about the great, brave doctors in Wuhan, eventually the great whistleblower who was chastised and threatened to be put in prison, who died weeks later from the CCP virus. | ||
| Jim Hoft, now you're seeing the walls close in on Fauci. | ||
| How do you anticipate he's going to try to spin his way and lie his way out of his responsibility for what went on in the Wuhan lab, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, Steve. | |
| You'll notice in this interview he actually switches his answer in the two different segments. | ||
| At first he says it's preposterous, it's dangerous, it's not helpful, what Rand Paul was saying. | ||
| Then in the next little answer 20 seconds later, he says, Well, yeah, we funded these, these laboratories. | ||
| And we did it with any money. | ||
| And we did it through contractor, which is everything Rand Paul accused him of in a hearing. | ||
| So obviously, Dr. Fauci is not held to account when he lies in front of Congress. | ||
| Other people might be, but Dr. Fauci has not completely changed his stuff. | ||
| He is due on this whole thing. | ||
| And Steve, I know you, when you came out with this, Last year, we knew we were over the target because about 10 of these fact-checkers came and bombarded us and said that it was a lie and we're spreading conspiracy. | ||
| Now a year later, just like you, just like us, we found out we were absolutely 100% accurate. | ||
| And now we have Fauci in this, the rat in the trap, Who should be in big trouble. | ||
| Is anyone ever going to follow up on these questions except for Rand Paul? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| No, no, we are. | ||
| Here's the reason. | ||
| We can't get forward, you can't go forward until you really get to the bottom of this. | ||
| And Fauci, the blood on his hands for the missile. | ||
| Remember, Peter Navarro is an eyewitness and he has all the documentation. | ||
| Peter Navarro has all the emails. | ||
| Peter Navarro has all the reports. | ||
| He has everything Fauci did. | ||
| Fauci's danger was from those opening weeks, from the time of January, when he goes on Katzmatich says we have nothing to worry about. | ||
| Internally at the White House, he was blocking and thwarting much of this effort. | ||
| He's on public. | ||
| We're going to pull the clip. | ||
| He actually said, oh, I talked to my Chinese colleagues. | ||
| They would lie to us. | ||
| They would tell us everything that went on. | ||
| And it's all coming from a bat cave down on the Laotian border, a thousand miles from Wuhan, right? | ||
| These are lies. | ||
| This is not mistakes of fact. | ||
| And by the way, why didn't Fauci come forward immediately in the first meeting with Navarro and say, tell the President, we have done some funding of this lab. | ||
| We know these people very well. | ||
| We know it's not well managed. | ||
| None of that. | ||
| None of that. | ||
| And the mainstream media that held him all up, you're going to own him. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| You own it, CNN. | ||
| You own it, MSNBC. | ||
| You own it, New York Times. | ||
| Every magazine that had him on the cover. | ||
| Every magazine and newspaper that never asked a hard question of this guy in over a year, you own it. | ||
| And you can't spin it away now, the young woman, oh, well, you know, I don't want to, this is kind of controversial, let me just answer this. | ||
| No. | ||
| Tell your lawyers that's not good enough. | ||
| Because it's not going to be good enough. | ||
| This is all going to... November 3rd in the Wuhan Lab. | ||
| Those are the keys that pick the lock. | ||
| Once you get to the truth of that, you expose all the lies, all the misrepresentations, all the spin, and what they're trying to accomplish, okay? | ||
| That's why you've got to be on it, and you've got to be focused on it 24-7, and you can't veer off it. | ||
| Yes, sir? | ||
| You know, I suspect that Fauci in the early days of this thing, whenever the early days were, right? | ||
| He was really speaking to and dealing with and worrying about the concerns of his Chinese counterparts more than he was worried about doing his actual job as the head of NIAID in the United States. | ||
| And I think they have a lot of that correspondence. | ||
| Just saying, just saying. | ||
| A lot to be revealed in the days and weeks ahead. | ||
| Jim, you've been amazing. | ||
| I want to play, by the way, before I bring in Colonel Sullen, let's bring in Maria Bartiromo, the great Maria Bartiromo on futures. | ||
| Let's play this clip before we bring in Colonel Sullen. | ||
| Just hang on, let's play it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, and I'm back with Jamie Metzler, his senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. | |
| He's written a fantastic op-ed this morning in The Hill. | ||
| His book is Hacking Darwin, which you should check out. | ||
| Real quick, Jamie, the final question here, why is China trying so hard to cover up the coronavirus origin? | ||
| The reason is, if it turns out, and nobody, at least who I know, knows, if it turns out that the origin of the pandemic stems from an accidental lab leak followed by a criminal cover-up, the implications for China nationally and globally would be massive. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We could even imagine Xi Jinping possibly being overthrown. | |
| People all around the world demanding reparations from China and many other things. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Real quick before you go, you've done such great work on the history of Asia. | ||
| ongoing effort to cover this up and that's why everybody we're all together where you should be united as Americans as humans understanding wanting to understand how this pandemic began so we can address our greatest vulnerabilities. | ||
| Absolutely. Real quick before you go you've done such great work on the history of Asia. Characterize Mao for us. | ||
| So Mao is a monster. | ||
| Everybody in the world should recognize that. | ||
| People in China know that Mao is responsible for the deaths of some 47 million Chinese people. | ||
| The problem is that the legitimacy of the Chinese government depends on its connection to Mao and the revolution. | ||
| I'd actually say 90 million, and that does not include 400 million murders, forced abortions, I think 80-20 of young women, of baby girls. | ||
| He's a monster. | ||
| And she's a monster. | ||
| It's a transnational criminal organization, not a legitimate government. | ||
| Jim Hoft, Brother Hoft, you just heard it right there. | ||
| Tell us where the Gateway Pundit's going on your reporting, sir, on this effort, on the effort of Wuhan Lab. | ||
| Where are you guys headed on this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think we see from that last clip, Steve, which was really brilliant, and Maria's really the best on television today, besides the war room. | |
| But we're seeing that it's not just the Chinese officials who are involved in this cover-up. | ||
| I think we're starting to find out that there might be a few U.S. | ||
| officials who are involved in the cover-up, too. | ||
| James, Jim, how do people get to the Gateway Pundit? | ||
| How do they get to all your social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so it's TheGatewayPundit.com and we're no longer on Twitter, but we're on Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, CloudHub, several others. | |
| So you can find us out there. | ||
| You're a hero. | ||
| You're a show prep, so please don't stop. | ||
| You make my job so much easier. | ||
| Love you, brother. | ||
| Keep pounding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're a hero. | |
| Thanks. | ||
| Rahim, before I bring in Colonel Sullen, you've got additional reporting. | ||
| Because remember, the other misdirection player that keeps saying now, the new phrase you're going to hear is lab leak. | ||
| Inverting lab leak. | ||
| Inverting lab leak. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| This is gain-of-function, man-enhanced virus Okay? | ||
| It either inadvertently leaked, or miles ago these guys said, Dr. Lee Mignan said they absolutely did it on purpose, Dr. Ping sitting there said they won the bio war, but don't let it, it's not, this is not some natural, oh they were studying a bat and it got in, no, no, no, no, this is a gain of function, man-enhanced, with money supplied by Dr. Fauci, do all, Galveston, And through Echo Health Alliance, Rahim Ghassan, you're reporting. | ||
| Material support, emotional support, you know, you name it, Fauci's been all along the way with it. | ||
| And later on today, we will show you how in the early days of the pandemic, once again, Fauci was collaborating with Chinese Communist Party officials. | ||
| He said so himself. | ||
| We've got him in his own words. | ||
| Watch out for that later today. He slipped today by saying communist and saying he said communist. Okay Rahim Ghassan and Natalie Winters are living in his head rent-free. I'm bringing now another hero Colonel Sullen you're reporting up on your site and on the gateway pundit you did this interview You actually take it to a whole nother level You say, hey, ladies and gentlemen, you've got to back off here. | ||
| The PLA and the Chinese Communist Party is so infiltrated into our research apparatus, whether it's the University of Texas at Galveston or even at Fort Detrick. | ||
| We've got about a minute here. | ||
| We're going to hold you over the break. | ||
| Tell us what your theory of the case is, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, here's the story in a nutshell. | |
| Inside Fort Detrick, there are two major institutes, research institutes, the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease, USAMRIC, where I work, and the Frederick Cancer Research Center, which is part of the National Institutes of Health. | ||
| And before we go into a break, what I can say at this point is that the People's Liberation Army has always been interested in infiltrating USAMRID, but it was difficult to do. | ||
| So what they did, starting in the mid to late Clinton administration, they attacked the soft underbelly of Fort Detrick, which is the Frederick Cancer Research Institute, and CCP scientists started coming to the to the cancer institute because before that there was actually very little contact between you sam read and and the cancer institute they did cancer we did uh... | ||
| uh... | ||
| army uh... bio defense so it started there let me know I'll continue when you're... Yeah, we'll take a short commercial break. | ||
| Remember, Fort Detrick is our bioweapons defense apparatus, the top in the world. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll return with Colonel Lawrence Sellen in the War Room next. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back. | ||
| By the way, whether you think it's a bioweapon or if you think it's a total hoax, the one thing we've learned in the last 18 months, you've got to take care of your immune system. | ||
| You have to boost it. | ||
| That's your responsibility. | ||
| Remember, the work on oneself begins on oneself. | ||
| Go to warrendefense.com today. | ||
| Free vitamin D3 and zinc. | ||
| Got to pay shipping and handling, but you get access to information about your immune system. | ||
| Go there today. | ||
| Support. | ||
| Our sponsors go there and make some smart decisions. | ||
| But get the information, okay? | ||
| Also, Armored Piercing Show, Mike Lindell opens the show tomorrow. | ||
| A lot of breaking news with Mike Lindell regarding the November 3rd election. | ||
| So make sure you're here at 10 o'clock to hear Mike Lindell. | ||
| Support MyPillow. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Type in promo code WARROOM. | ||
| Be getting yourself a couple of three pillows, do it today. | ||
| $29.98, $40 off, so make sure you get to the pillows. | ||
| Big sale on that, not going to last forever. | ||
| MyPillow.com, promo code Rahim. | ||
| You've got a podcast later today exactly on Dr. Fauci in relationships to the Wuhan lab. | ||
| That's right, more Fauci, his links to Chinese communists, more Patrice Cullors, Black Lives Matter, stuff that we're unearthing, never been seen or heard before. | ||
| Cultural revolution stuff. | ||
| Audio and footage. | ||
| We have it. | ||
| Colonel Sullen, we've only got time. | ||
| We've got to get you back tomorrow. | ||
| I've got to ask you a question. | ||
| You're one of the top guys, a revered guy at Fort Dietrich. | ||
| Fort Dietrich is the elite of the elite of the bioweapon defense in the world. | ||
| Explain to our audience, how does PLA Associated Doctors, Chinese Communist Party doctors, even get on that base, regardless if they're working on one of Fauci's and Collins's NIH thing? | ||
| How does that happen? | ||
| You can allow Chinese Communist Party scientists near, anywhere near Fort Detrick. | ||
| Tell me how that happened. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's because there's no national security accountability. | |
| And as I said, they couldn't immediately get into So, they started coming in mid to late 90s to the Frederick Cancer Research Center, which is a walking distance from USAMRIID. | ||
| And the CCP scientists, when they got there, they actually switched from cancer and started working on dangerous viruses, which they were collaborating with other Chinese scientists inside China. | ||
| So, this piqued the interest of the people inside USAMRID and you started seeing collaborations between USAMRID and the CCP scientists at the Frederick Cancer Research Institute. | ||
| And then sometimes some of those scientists would be working temporarily inside USAMRID. | ||
| And then finally, we have this Chinese CCP scientist. | ||
| His name is Dr. Kevin Zhang. | ||
| He uses Kevin. | ||
| Who came into the U.S. | ||
| through the Frederick Cancer Research Institute, is now a permanent employee at USAMRID, and in 2018, because they never sever relationships with their institutes in China, he went back and did a grand tour of lectures throughout China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| Now the other interesting thing is he comes from the southeast University, which is in Nanjing. And Nanjing is the headquarters of the PLA's Eastern Theater Command. And this is the command which isolated the bat coronaviruses, which Dr. Li Ming-Yan says is the backbone of COVID-19. | ||
| Dr. | ||
| and Colonel Sullen, because you're both, you saw Fauci in that interview actually have a forty and slip in say communist before he caught himself Do you think the pressure is starting to build around Fauci? | ||
| He understands that people that have the facts are now starting to focus on his central role in all this, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think Anthony Fauci is toast. | |
| He was not just involved in funding the gain-of-function research, which I have found that continued even into last year, although it was done with dengue virus. | ||
| He's also involved in funding all the other programs in the United States, which have links not only to Chinese virus research programs, but through them, connections to the People's Liberation Army. | ||
| He also was involved early on in the effort by some U.S.-based scientists, Peter Daszak, for example, to actually suppress any discussion of the laboratory origin of COVID-19. | ||
| This was done very early on before anyone could have possibly known its origin, the end of January, the beginning of February. | ||
| And Dr. Anthony Fauci was involved in those discussions. | ||
| In my opinion, he's gone along with this to suppress any discussion of the laboratory origin, and now he's getting caught up in it. | ||
| He's, you know, the rat caught in the cage, as you said. | ||
| Colonel Selland, how do people get access—we're going to be back on—how do people get access to your writings and your thinking and all this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the best place is on Twitter, at Lawrence Selland on Twitter. | |
| We have daily updates. | ||
| Of what we're doing in terms of revealing COVID-19, revealing China's biological warfare program, and revealing the massive China and PLA infiltration of U.S. | ||
| virus research programs. | ||
| Colonel Sullen, you're a patriot and a hero. | ||
| Thank you very much for joining us here in the War Room. | ||
| I want everybody to go there. | ||
| Twitter feed is hot all day long. | ||
| Colonel Sullen, thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, sir. | |
| Want to end the show today. | ||
| Okay, podcast with Raheem later? | ||
| Yeah, that's right. | ||
| It should be out about 4 p.m. | ||
| Eastern Time. | ||
| It's going to be explosive. | ||
| Okay, we're going to talk about the Dalton Rally. | ||
| A lot more going on with Raheem this week. | ||
| Okay, we're going to end this. | ||
| Rolling Thunder. | ||
| By the way, just on that, the website for the Dalton Rally is AmericaFirstRallyTour.com. | ||
| AmericaFirstRallyTour. | ||
| Make sure you go there. | ||
| Okay, from 1966, the Rolling Thunder Review with Bob Dylan and the band on Bob Dylan's 80th birthday. |
Export Selection