May 14, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
47:35
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| Jonathan Lemire, you were at the White House when the President made this address yesterday in the Rose Garden, and there's been slight criticism along the way that perhaps the administration is too careful, perhaps the CDC is behind the science and is, you know, holding back on setting us free. | ||
| But at the same time, it does instill confidence, because when they come out with an announcement like this, you know that all the, you know, everything is in place And the science is perfectly aligned with the policy and it can be a moment that is truly celebrated. | ||
| There's an issue of trust that I think this administration is trying to reinforce in everything they do. | ||
| No, Mika, that's right. | ||
| And from the first moments of this president's term, they've been very conscious of the messaging and imagery being put forth about the president himself and the White House staff and how they are conducting themselves. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Remember, on January 20th, when President Biden sat behind the Resolute Desk in the Office for the first time to sign some executive orders, he was doing so wearing a mask. | |
| And yes, in recent weeks, there has been some going on. | ||
| That is Mika. | ||
| The science perfectly aligns with the policy and the truth and all that. | ||
| What science has CDC come out differently or Fauci in the last 48 hours? | ||
| Have we had a briefing on herd immunity? | ||
| Have we had a briefing on anything dealing with a set of mathematics or a set of data? | ||
| You know what we have is the New York Post reporting with seven New York Yankee Players and coaches have taken the vaccine and now have COVID, but that's a good thing. | ||
| When you read their articles, it's actually a positive. | ||
| It's positive they took the vaccine and got COVID because that's positive. | ||
| And Bill Maher and the Bill Maher Show being shut down. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| It's Friday the 14th of May, the Year of the Lord 2021, the second hour. | ||
| Over 52 million downloads in the podcast. | ||
| John Frederick Radio Network nationwide. | ||
| Real America's Voice live streaming nationwide, also up on Dischannel 219, Comcast Cable, Channel 113, Roku, Pluto, all the systems, and of course in G-News, GTV, subtitled and actually live in Mandarin and later in Japanese. | ||
| And of course, the Mandarin edition blown through the firewall later in the day for Lao Bai Jing. | ||
| OK, I want to get to one of the more serious thinkers of this. | ||
| Dr. Joseph Mercola joins us today. | ||
| He's got a new book out. | ||
| But I've got to ask you, doctor, just right off the bat, how dumb do they think the American people are? | ||
| And I'm not saying masks shouldn't come off or all that, but how do they come out just with this? | ||
| They need to change the conversation because we have a crisis at the border. | ||
| We now have a crisis with our ally in Israel. | ||
| We have a crisis in our finances. | ||
| We have a crisis in the economy. | ||
| We have so many actions they've taken in their arrogant way have now blown up in their face. | ||
| That they got it in Arizona showing every day his illegitimacy, because Georgia is going to show that in Michigan is going to show that Pennsylvania is going to show that. | ||
| And they know that. | ||
| They know that they know that's what's coming. | ||
| That's why they're so so freaked out about it. | ||
| And we're deciding what's in in state Senate adjudication and in legal court battles. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Because this whole thing in Arizona is going to go to court very quickly, if not today, very quickly next week, back to court. | ||
| So Dr. Mercola, just here in the last 48 hours, now we can take a mask off and we can celebrate. | ||
| Mika tells us we can actually be celebratory. | ||
| We can celebrate. | ||
| What are they trying to sell us, sir? | ||
| Well, they're trying to sell us more vaccine. | ||
| It's very clear. | ||
| They didn't say everyone could take the mask off. | ||
| They said only those who were vaccinated could take the mask off. | ||
| So there's a clear Push to continue to encourage, not encourage, but propagandize people to get the vaccine. | ||
| They've reached a plateau. | ||
| There are not many more people who are seeking to get the vaccine because they've effectively propagandized a large portion of the population, and they took the vaccine propaganda hook, line, and sinker, and they've reached a plateau. | ||
| There's 30-40% of Americans who refuse to get it. | ||
| So one third of the, I think, like 34% of America is vaccinated. | ||
| Look, I'm not an anti-vaxxer. | ||
| I think there's some members of our audience are, but... | ||
| I think a big portion of our audience and a big portion of the people I know, and many of those with Ivy League degrees, are vaccine hesitant. | ||
| And the reason is they're not quite sure. | ||
| We started this show back on the 23rd of January 2020, when the mainstream media were laughing at me. | ||
| Tony Fauci went on WABC that weekend and said there's nothing to worry about here. | ||
| And when I talked to people, the very first thing we had, Dr. Stephen Hatfield came in and he talked about herd immunity. | ||
| And he said, herd immunity, explained all the nomenclature to the audience, said, yeah, that's when people have had the virus and they build up a herd immunity. | ||
| It'll be 60, 70, 80 percent. | ||
| We don't know what that number is, but that's how it's done. | ||
| And I kind of said, well, it's therapeutics or the what about a vaccine? | ||
| And he said a vaccine, he said a vaccine will be five or 10 years away at minimum. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And this is Hatfield, who was at Fort Detrick for many, many decades. | ||
| So for the vaccine hesitant, just let's say it's not propaganda. | ||
| What is your beef with what they did with the vaccine? | ||
| And why do you say it's propaganda from people who are just saying, hey, I would be open to take it if I could get my arms around. | ||
| Is it the right thing to do for me and my family health wise? | ||
| So why do you say it's propaganda and why do you say they haven't made the case for that? | ||
| Because they haven't. | ||
| If you clearly study and investigate objectively the facts, any rational person will reach that conclusion. | ||
| What are the facts? | ||
| Prior to this vaccine being implemented, it is categorized as an unprecedented vaccine. | ||
| Examples of other unprecedented vaccines would be HIV and malaria. | ||
| If an unprecedented vaccine takes a minimum of 12 to 15 years to put into production, and even then, after it goes through phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, The predicted success rate, effectiveness rate of that vaccine is estimated to be about 2%. | ||
| So what do we have with the COVID-19 vaccine? | ||
| Operation Warp Speed. | ||
| The vaccine came into commercial production in less than one year. | ||
| That is technically impossible to have not only an effective vaccine, but a safe vaccine. | ||
| They just bashed through all the safety trials. | ||
| Look, let's look at the safety trials. | ||
| They say it's 93 to 95% effective. | ||
| Bastardized statistical science by conflating absolute risk with relative risk. | ||
| The relative risk is a 93 to 95% reduction in symptoms, in symptoms, not prevention of disease, not providing herd immunity. | ||
| And so what is the production, the actual reduction in effective decrease in symptoms is about 1% when you do, when you do the statistics. | ||
| And as this is written by Doshi in British Medical Journal. | ||
| So that's one. | ||
| And then they, so that they did have some trials. | ||
| This shows you the egregiousness of their behavior. | ||
| I mean, this is so reprehensible, the people behind this issue should be put in jail permanently. | ||
| They never tested pregnant women. | ||
| But hang on, slow down. | ||
| You've got pharmaceutical companies that are made up of American citizens, many of whom are people's neighbors and sons and daughters or husbands and wives. | ||
| You've got a government, and the last time I checked, It was under Donald J. Trump and you had other people of President Trump working on these efforts. | ||
| And this effort was underway, not just with therapeutics, but also with getting a vaccine. | ||
| So all these people can't be bad actors. | ||
| Yet what you're laying forward is what bad actors would do. | ||
| So help me. | ||
| Is it the systems like this or is this a series of bad actors? | ||
| Because these are these are pretty tough. | ||
| It's not a series. | ||
| It is not a series of bad actors is a series of people in authority to influence decisions. And this is not a partisan issue, Steve. It's absolutely not a partisan issue. This is a science issue. | ||
| So as I was stating, the pregnant women were not included in this trial. | ||
| This is just one example. | ||
| I'll give you many more of why you want to rethink your likelihood of getting this vaccine. | ||
| Not likelihood, but desire to get this vaccine. | ||
| So they excluded all pregnant women as they should have. | ||
| That is prudent and precautionary. | ||
| And they were not included in the trial. | ||
| Yet, three weeks ago, the CDC comes out and says pregnant women should get this vaccine. | ||
| Pregnant women should get this vaccine. | ||
| That is reprehensible malpractice. | ||
| And the women who have been getting this, if you look online, you can easily validate this because you don't have to believe anything I'm saying. | ||
| Just prove me wrong. | ||
| Look it up and find the facts and you can validate it for yourself. | ||
| But about a third of the women are reporting miscarriages. | ||
| Normally, it's about less than 5%. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| You're saying one-third of the women that have taken the vaccine are reporting miscarriages? | ||
| That's right. | ||
| And that's reported. | ||
| When you say reported, where is that reported? | ||
| It's reported online. | ||
| You can look it up. | ||
| I don't have the specific link to give you, but it's clear. | ||
| I mean, you just put it in a search engine. | ||
| Is it a reputable? | ||
| I mean, look, look, a lot of times with some of these online news services, they say it's too good to check. | ||
| Is that from a reputable? | ||
| That's a big charge. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| That's a big charge. | ||
| Do you know how long it takes to get this data into the system? | ||
| It takes a while. | ||
| This recommendation was less than three weeks old. | ||
| So there's no official database for it, and it's all self-reported. | ||
| I'm just asking if we can get the link to that, because these charges are, by the way, big. | ||
| It's big, meaningful charges. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| We just want to make sure it's backed up. | ||
| We back it up with facts, because that's how... | ||
| That's how Arizona is moving forward, that's how the Wuhan lab's investigation is moving forward, and this is obviously a big one. | ||
| And one of the reasons is, there's a huge portion of the American people, and the American people have great common sense, that have been bombarded by MSNBC and CNN, New York Times relentlessly, by movie stars, by concerts, by the Vatican, in every aspect of their life. | ||
| And for some reason, there's a big portion of the American people who are not anti-vaxxers, who are not caught up in this crusade about the vaccines, right? | ||
| Who are just sitting there and are not convinced. | ||
| It's not about availability now. | ||
| They're just not convinced. | ||
| They're not convinced because of certain things out there and that's what I want to try to get to the bottom to because I think that's going to make people have the information they can judge it. | ||
| Are you saying that just any vaccine you try to do in this time period, whether it's a gene splicing exercise or some sort of experimental thing on gene splicing or traditional vaccine, that nothing could have been safe In this time period, just given how concentrated the time period was to actually do this? | ||
| It's physically impossible. | ||
| Every expert on the topic, you can look this up, all the studies, articles, you cannot do it. | ||
| It's physically impossible. | ||
| They shortcutted this on the justification that they were going to save lives. | ||
| And if it truly was a pandemic that was killing a third of the population like bubonic plague For instance, in Europe, hundreds of years ago, then maybe it might be justified to take this type of risk. | ||
| But this is not, that's a whole other discussion of how many people are really dying from this. | ||
| And get to your point, is what is an anti-vaxxer? | ||
| Well, they're changing the entire narrative. | ||
| Merriam-Webster decided to redefine what an anti-vaxxer is. | ||
| It's anyone who disagrees with mandatory vaccination. | ||
| Anyone. | ||
| That's an anti-vaxxer. | ||
| Which is just throwing personal freedom and liberty out the window. | ||
| We've got only a couple minutes in this segment, but I know you can spend the next segment with us. | ||
| What I can't figure out, and no one's been able to explain it to me, herd immunity throughout history and these type of things, the basis of herd immunity is always people that have had a virus or disease before and have antibodies to it. | ||
| Why have they consistently now for the last couple of months, The logic is very simple. | ||
| It's just to push the belief, the desire to get the vaccination. | ||
| That is clearly what it is. | ||
| disease or had the virus into the calculation of herd immunity. | ||
| Why is it all now 90% vaccinations, which means you've got to get school children and you've got to get adolescents? | ||
| What was the logic? | ||
| We've got about a minute and we've got to jump to a break. | ||
| The logic is very simple. | ||
| It's just to push the belief, the desire to get the vaccination. | ||
| That is clearly what it is. | ||
| And it's not just antibodies. | ||
| There's two parts of your immune system, cellular and humeral immunity. | ||
| The humoral immunity is the antibodies, the cellular innate part of your immune system is really the crucial part. | ||
| The T-cells, yes. | ||
| And things like vitamin D, being metabolically flexible, not obese, not insulin resistant, these are all things that by themselves independently provide protection against any viral infection, not just COVID. | ||
| We've got to jump to break. | ||
| I just want to ask you, have you seen anywhere, because you're the expert that does all the research, have you seen anywhere they've made the case of why either antibodies or T-cells, people that have it, are not included in herd immunity? | ||
| Have you even seen them come out and try to make that case? | ||
| No, I haven't seen it. | ||
| Okay, we're going to go to short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to return with the revered Dr. Joseph Mercola when we return to the war room in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Would you tell them, no, no, no, the kids still need to wear a mask? | ||
| Yeah, the children do when they're out there playing with their friends and, you know, particularly in an indoor situation, they do. | ||
| But, you know, one of the things that's also important that's happened most recently is the approval of vaccines for children 12 to 15 years old. | ||
| And then we are also doing studies now in an age de-escalation from 12 to 9, 9 to 6, 6 to 2, and then 6 months to 2 years, so that we'll be able, hopefully by the end of the year, to be able to vaccinate children of any age. | ||
| But right now, the 12 to 15 year olds are eligible to get vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine. | ||
| So that's another good news story in all this. | ||
| Okay, our guest is Dr. Joseph Mercola. | ||
| That was Anthony Fauci, I think, on Jake Tapper yesterday. | ||
| Dr. Mercola, have you seen the evidence? | ||
| Has the evidence been put forward? | ||
| Have you seen the evidence that's been put forward about the testing of adolescents 12 to 15 that would lead to, I guess, this emergency youth use authorization? | ||
| What would need to be shown, and my understanding is that when Moderna first tried to do children's vaccine, nobody signed up for it. | ||
| Now, they do have something, I understand, testing going on, and I think some of it might be in the United Kingdom. | ||
| I think something might be here. | ||
| But how long would you what would be the appropriate period that the profession would take to to study this before talking about vaccinating children six months old? And remember, Fauci were the ones who found the AP interview where he said six, eight weeks ago in a buried lead in the AP that basically to get to herd immunity, you had to get to 90 percent vaccinations and to get to 90 percent vaccinations. You had to get the school kids and that would start. | ||
| He told Savannah Guthrie that high schools would start in the fall, but that all school children would be vaccinated, made it a declarative statement, would be vaccinated by year end. | ||
| What level of study would you need to do to have babies and children up from six months to, what, 12, have, you know, that you could actually vaccinate these children? | ||
| The experts are very clear on the answer to this question, which is 12 to 15 years, 12 to 15 years, not less than one year. | ||
| And they certainly have not done that. | ||
| And it's all about a risk to reward ratio. | ||
| What is the risk? | ||
| What is the reward? | ||
| What is the risk to these children? | ||
| Virtually none, no one in this age group is dying from COVID-19. | ||
| No one. | ||
| So what benefit are they getting? | ||
| None. | ||
| And here's the other issue. | ||
| How can they possibly have informed consent? | ||
| Informed consent means that you get both sides of the equation, not just one propagandized brainwashing message from the mainstream media. | ||
| So it's impossible. | ||
| If they truly believed in this, they would open up the dialogue so they can hear all sides, but anyone, anyone who disagrees with their narrative is censored immediately and it's not de-platformed. | ||
| Okay, on informed consent, besides your blowback and the folks that you're close to, and that's I would say the anti-vaxxer crowd, but now some of the vaccine hesitant, besides how you would counter, just to get to informed consent, What information would you need? | ||
| What data would you need to be able to review before you came up with your theory? | ||
| In other words, what would you demand? | ||
| We want to see it just once. | ||
| So what data would you need to see? | ||
| How about death rates? | ||
| You've been alive long enough to remember swine flu. | ||
| There was no dex liability from prosecution because it was prior to 1986 when they passed that law. | ||
| This is in the late 70s. | ||
| So they got all nervous and said, okay, everyone's going to get swine flu vaccine. | ||
| They were able to vaccinate 48 million, which is half the number of people they vaccinated. | ||
| For COVID-19. | ||
| What happened? | ||
| Well, there's a lot of people, the government was paying for the liability. | ||
| Lots of people came down with Guillain-Barre syndrome and 53 people died. | ||
| What was the response? | ||
| The government shut down the program immediately and paid out over three and a half billion dollars in damages. | ||
| Where are we at today? | ||
| So you want to see death rates of, not just from the COVID, the CCP virus, you want to see death rates We have over 4000 people who have died to date. | ||
| Okay, fine. So what else besides death rate? | ||
| We have four. Let me talk statistics. | ||
| That's been four over 4,000 people who have died to date. | ||
| That is more than all the other vaccines combined for the last deaths. I'm talking about for the last 15 years. | ||
| They're counter. | ||
| They're counter. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| They're hang on. | ||
| They're counter to that in that in that with the Valor system that Tucker, the great Tucker Carlson, VAERS system that Tucker cited, they would say, well, hey, that's just raw data and it includes people who since so many targeted communities here. | ||
| We're going to die. | ||
| Anyway, you're counting those people. | ||
| What say you to that to the third counter? | ||
| I You can't have it both ways. | ||
| You can't give someone a falsely positive COVID-19 test last year, dying of a motorcycle accident or terminally ill with cancer and count that as a COVID-19 death. | ||
| Then have someone die within a few hours a week after receiving the vaccine with no comorbidity problems and count that as just a coincidence. | ||
| Okay, what other data? | ||
| You have the death rates from the VAERS. | ||
| The VAERS database has been reported for over 30 years, so they're no stranger to properly reporting vaccine deaths. | ||
| You're saying this criticism of it is just here in the last couple of weeks. | ||
| It's hogwash. | ||
| Absolute hogwash. | ||
| Okay, for informed consent, besides you would make arguments, I'm just trying to get the data set you would need and the people that you work with would need. | ||
| You have deaths from vaccines, what else? | ||
| Complications, side effects. | ||
| Over a long period. | ||
| Yeah, this is only six months since they've been administrating. | ||
| We need to look at it for a few years before you launch this thing out unless there's an epidemic where people are dropping like flies. | ||
| A third of the population is dead. | ||
| Then you don't have a choice. | ||
| You have to change the rules and the policy and that is not this epidemic at all. | ||
| This isn't even an epidemic anymore. | ||
| There's not enough people to die and to qualify it unless you change the definitions like the WHO conveniently did for so many of these characteristics. | ||
| Dr. McCall, one other thing. | ||
| Do you believe that the information on the testing that got to the emergency use authorization, has enough of the details and backup been presented to the scientific community and to you that you guys can actually review that so that you could get people that listen to you and to other people like you to inform consent? | ||
| Have they been forthcoming with the actual results of this testing they've already done? | ||
| Oh sure, the testing. | ||
| It's completely inadequate. | ||
| 100% inadequate. | ||
| And then you would think, OK, the primary testing isn't the testing, but the vaccine is a messenger RNA vaccine done by Pfizer and Moderna. | ||
| Pfizer, of course, and Johnson & Johnson are both criminal organizations that have been criminally prosecuted and paid out judgments over billions of dollars before. | ||
| So these are not saints. | ||
| These are companies with a history. | ||
| Okay, so why would you believe that they're in it for benefit of humanity? | ||
| Clearly, that's the last thing. | ||
| But hang on for a second. | ||
| Hang on, hang on. | ||
| It's one thing, they have, I guess, been prosecuted for certain things. | ||
| But why do you say, and what backup do you have when you say that they're a criminal organization? | ||
| I mean, it's a pretty big charge. | ||
| They've been convicted of crimes, criminal crimes, and paid billions of dollars in fines for doing so. | ||
| They've killed tens of millions of people. | ||
| Johnston & Johnston most recently with his Abestos. | ||
| Pfizer for the Vioxx product in the year 2000, they get 60,000 people who died from strokes from releasing a drug they knew well before they launched it would cause this complication. | ||
| They were willing to sacrifice money for human health. | ||
| It's a classic time trial strategy that they do consistently. | ||
| We only have a couple minutes left. | ||
| I want to talk about the book, but I do want to have you back about making the case of what data you believe needs to be set forth and what people, the vaccine hesitant, because the anti-vaxxers are never going to get there, but the vaccine hesitant What they would have to review to you believe it would reach the level of informed consent. | ||
| So we want to have you back, but tell us about... Denver, let's get the book up. | ||
| Tell us about the book, because the book is going to be... I'm sure a lot of people are going to be influenced by this book. | ||
| Talk us through about the book. | ||
| Well, it's a book that we've compiled, put together over the last nine months or so to present and summarize in a very concise way because there's so much information out there to help you understand the other side. | ||
| It will help you understand the broader picture and help you really reach a level of consciousness about the facts so that you can make an informed decision, informed consent. | ||
| What would you say, what websites for people to get you think the information is not being put out by the mainstream media? | ||
| How do they get to your website? | ||
| What are you looking for? | ||
| There's a number. | ||
| How do they get the book? | ||
| Book is available any place you buy books, Amazon being the primary one, of course, but any other bookstore has it. | ||
| Then the other, there are many other websites, NVIC.org, National Vaccine Information Center, started almost 40 years ago. | ||
| Children's Defense site by Robert Kennedy, Jr. | ||
| has a lot of similar information that we've and there's there's there's probably dozens of other sites that not probably there are dozens of other sites that just too numerous to mention at this time. | ||
| But they're out there. | ||
| If you were able to go and look for. | ||
| If you will make sure we put up in the live show, we've got about a minute and a half left. | ||
| If you were able to get in the Oval Office this afternoon without Anthony Fauci and were able to have a conversation with Joe Biden, what are the two or three things you would tell him that he needs to do today to get the nation as healthy as possible given this pandemic that's out there. | ||
| To improve everyone's innate immune system, which Fauci agrees to. | ||
| He actually takes vitamin D regularly, admitted to takes vitamin C. So that's the first step. | ||
| Optimize your vitamin D levels very, very clearly. | ||
| Become metabolically flexible, less insulin resistant, because you've got to build your own immune system. | ||
| That's the alternative to the vaccine. | ||
| Your own immune system. | ||
| Vaccine is not magic. | ||
| All it does is work with your immune system, provide protection. | ||
| If your immune system isn't functioning optimally, it's not going to work. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| No mystery. | ||
| This is not news. | ||
| This has just been common sense for as long as we've known about the vaccine. | ||
| So the first strategy is to optimize your own innate immune system. | ||
| Dr. Mercola, thank you very much. | ||
| Great honor to have you on. | ||
| We look forward to having you back on the concept of informed consent, what the American people actually have to know, the data they have to see to have their own common sense kick in and give consent to this program. | ||
| So thank you very much for joining us. | ||
| Real honor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're welcome. | |
| Dr. Joseph McCullough, we're going to make sure people ought to read this book. | ||
| It gives you an alternative side that's being presented right now and very, very, very important. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We'll return to The War Room in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Look, we talk about hinge moments. | ||
| We talked, you know, we had the other day that video up there from the guys at the Lincoln Project, who are not good guys, right? | ||
| But they're smart, and they talked about this, kind of these wedges or these hinges. | ||
| This is why we're so focused on 3 November, and this is why we're so focused on the Wuhan lab, and the origins of it, the responsibility, what exactly happened, and this is why we've tied Fauci to this. | ||
| From the beginning, because you can't go forward until you get, you've got to get, because you have to get that done and have to understand it down to its, the very granular details before you can go forward, because then things are built off of that. | ||
| Right? | ||
| That's where we're monogamous about it. | ||
| Dr. Mercola, the same way. | ||
| And look, there's a ton of information out there, but we've got to drive forward and get our arms around that. | ||
| That's why we're very honored to have Dr. Mercola on there. | ||
| And you ought to read his book. | ||
| But you ought to read the other stuff, too. | ||
| I know a number of people I respect totally disagree with him. | ||
| But we've got to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| The one thing I do believe strongly Is in the common sense of the American people and the common sense, the American people, when they're looking after their health and their family's health in this issue of informed consent, what data, what information has to be put out there? | ||
| Not not what not what Mika. | ||
| She thinks that game's for that game's not playing anymore. | ||
| This is why Joe Biden's numbers are collapsing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Not the fake polls they put, but his numbers are collapsing. | ||
| Because people kind of see, one, it's the out of control nature of decisions he makes and how nothing actually works, but it all spins and that they all want to air cover for him. | ||
| But the other is the actual legitimacy of himself in that office. | ||
| And that's what we're going to get to the bottom of. | ||
| And there's many more Arizonas to come. | ||
| OK, there are great patriots out there that are working nonstop every day on this, great patriots working nonstop every day on this. | ||
| We've got to get to the bottom of it and we will get to the bottom of it. | ||
| Like we're going to get to the bottom of the Wuhan lab, we're going to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| You saw Fauci's face the other day in that hearing with Rand Paul. | ||
| That's not the happy Fauci you see. | ||
| He's angry. | ||
| You know why he's angry? | ||
| Because he's been caught, caught in just a number of lies, a number of misrepresentations. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And we're going to prove it. | ||
| We've got to prove it with facts. | ||
| You know, we're evidence based, science based database. | ||
| That's what we're about. | ||
| And so. | ||
| This is why we're honey badgers. | ||
| As sure as the turning of the earth. | ||
| We're going to get to the bottom of this. | ||
| OK? | ||
| I want to now turn to Liz, you're another honey badger. | ||
| And this comes up with, you know, Liz is Catholic, I'm Catholic. | ||
| Gets to be the situation with the Vatican and really The whole core of the rot of the Vatican, not the faith itself, obviously not the faith, but the administration of the faith. | ||
| You've got all these things they're doing, and today there's another big conference, the Climate Change Conference. | ||
| The Climate Change Conference, and they've got John Kerry, and I guess Yellen, and the Pope's putting it on. | ||
| It's another conference to follow on their mind, body, soul. | ||
| These things are riddled with people that are veritably opposed to the core tenets of the faith. | ||
| right, the core tenants of the face, yet they are all over these conferences. But one of the things we've been trying to get to is actually how this whole thing is kind of run and how it's financed, right? And we have a secret deal with a materialistic, atheistic, transnational criminal organization called the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And they're not shy about saying they're materialistic, atheistic, and not just don't believe in God or the Judeo-Christian West or the tenets of the Judeo-Christian faith. | ||
| They don't believe in any faith. | ||
| They don't believe in Islam. | ||
| That's one of the reasons they're destroying the Uyghurs. | ||
| They don't believe in the Tibetan Buddhism. | ||
| They don't believe in Buddhism. | ||
| That's why they're destroying the Tibetan Buddhists and the Dalai Lama. | ||
| They don't believe in the great religion of Of the nation of India, of Hinduism, that's where they're virtually at war with India, up in the southwest on their northwest border. | ||
| They certainly don't believe in evangelical Christianity. | ||
| In fact, I think the Express newspaper reports in London that the biggest fear that she has, it's not the American military, it's not certainly the American government, it's not the American capital markets, they're his friends or the City of London, his biggest fear is 300 million Evangelical, underground evangelical Christians. | ||
| That's his biggest fear. | ||
| They feared the Falun Gong. | ||
| That's what they made it. | ||
| Oh, it's a it's not a form of Buddhism or spirituality. | ||
| It's a bizarre cult. | ||
| And let's just do live human organ transfers. | ||
| We're going to have a doctor that actually did that on the show here and over the next week or so who did live organ transfers, which were part of the regime. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So but we got to get to the bottom of what the relations are and how the Vatican kind of puts us up. | ||
| And now you get another money laundering scandal. | ||
| I want to bring Liz you're in. | ||
| We want to talk about this conference that that that the Biden administration has with the Vatican. | ||
| They get a whole nother conference within a week each other. | ||
| This one's on climate change because of all the world's spiritual problems. | ||
| Obviously, climate change is the most important of all the spiritual problems we have throughout the world and all the problems we have in propagating The biggest problem we have is climate change, okay? | ||
| But now, you know, just an unfortunate incident happens. | ||
| They get one of their cohorts, Liz, correct me if I'm wrong, in London. | ||
| I think somebody gets arrested in this huge money laundering scheme where they're siphoning From Peter's Pence, which is the second collection, to all those Catholics out there, where you're throwing your five dollar bill in, that money gets skimmed right away to the Vatican, doesn't go through the diocese, doesn't go to your parish, gets taken right back to Rome, and this is his, traditionally has been his slush fund, to work on supposedly, you know, to heretofore, you know, good projects that the Pope thinks needs to be done to propagate the Catholic faith. | ||
| But it turns out that Peter Spence is, I don't know Liz, tell me, you're the expert, is funneling hundreds of millions of pounds into the West End of London, which is the most expensive real estate, where you have Arab sheiks and oligarchs from Russia are living there with models from Ukraine, right? | ||
| It's not exactly a place where you see the monks anymore. | ||
| But we're funneling hundreds of millions of pounds, Principally, and let's be blunt about this, coming from working class Catholics, Hispanics, And African-Americans and Caucasians, Hispanians, in Catholic churches in the United States of America, their hard-earned money, where they throw a 20 in there in that second collection for the Pope's fund. | ||
| Understand, it's not going into Central Africa to propagate the faith and to fight the Boko Haram. | ||
| It's not going to the Middle East to save the churches of the Desert Fathers. | ||
| It's not going to support what's going on With the underground Catholic Church that they sold out in this private deal that Cardinal Zinn, one of the holiest guys on earth, says was a sell-out. | ||
| It's not going to support the underground Catholics and things. | ||
| No. | ||
| Where is it going? | ||
| Of course! | ||
| Why not put it into the West End of London, in Chelsea, to buy hundreds of millions of dollars of real estate between Russian oligarchs and Arab sheiks and dictators coming out of that are suppressing the people in Africa and putting the money in Switzerland and then putting it in real estate. | ||
| Why are we not like the Russian oligarchs and why are we not like the Arab sheikhs that don't put the money back to their people? | ||
| Why are we not like the warlords in Africa that launder it through Swiss banks and then put it into the West End of London? | ||
| Why don't we just do that? | ||
| So Liz, can you explain to me what Pope, what's his name, Bergano, right? | ||
| Tell me what he's doing with the finances. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it seems like every week, Steve, there's a financial scandal along with a theological political scandal coming out of the Vatican. | ||
| This is the latest. | ||
| It's huge. | ||
| It's being covered by all the mainstream media in the UK. | ||
| The Italian police asked for a warrant for the arrest of the Italian broker who is living in London. | ||
| Who negotiated the deal to buy, and as you said, Steve, a $350 million building in the Tony Project area of London and Chelsea. | ||
| And as a result of this deal, now this guy Gianni Luigi Torzi is the one who was arrested this week. | ||
| And they've charged him with money laundering. | ||
| Now, Mr. Torzi, who was involved in this deal, brokering for the Vatican, says that Pope Francis was fully aware of the details of this negotiation and deal on the property. | ||
| So it appears that the Vatican is going to try and make Torzi, the fall guy, In this financial boondoggle, and I say it's a financial boondoggle because they used the money and leverage of Peter Spence, the charity of the Pope. | ||
| Now, this is the Pope of Mercy, the Pope of the poor, remember, to buy this property. | ||
| Um, so we're going to see what's going to happen. | ||
| I suspect that Torzi is going to go down fighting and is not going to allow himself to be the scapegoat in this deal. | ||
| Already there's been a major firing of a cardinal who is very close to Pope Francis. | ||
| And now the trial is going to happen in the Vatican or in Rome, and we'll see what happens. | ||
| But, you know, here we are on the same week that this guy Torzi is arrested for a financial scandal involving the Vatican. | ||
| And the Vatican has the gall to have a new propaganda conference, and it's both online and in person. | ||
| And the title of this conference is Dreaming of a Better Restart. | ||
| And Steve, so this really begs the question, was the great restart not so good? | ||
| And so we're going to dream of a better restart. | ||
| And, you know, as you pointed out, it's all the globalists. | ||
| Janet Yellen, Biden's climate envoy, the private jet loving, swift boater, windsurfing, Gulfstream lover. | ||
| John Kerry is going to be the keynoter on the heads of the IMF, the World Bank. | ||
| So why is this important for people who are not Catholic to watch what's going on in the Vatican? | ||
| European countries and some Latin American countries. | ||
| So why is this important for people who are not Catholic to watch what's going on in the Vatican? | ||
| It's important because the Vatican is the intersection of the deep state and the deep church. | ||
| And if we want to know what's really, they're telegraphing their next move. | ||
| This is what the globalists are doing. | ||
| And they're using the moral platform, quote unquote, moral platform of the Vatican. | ||
| So it's important to look at what's going to be happening next. | ||
| What are the arguments they're going to be using? | ||
| Now, the two topics which are hysterical, financial and tax solidarity, which are going to be discussed at this conference, and one of them is going to be the Integral ecological sustainability. | ||
| Well, what does that mean? | ||
| Examine climate change in the context of a sustainable and fair transformation of the energy and food system. | ||
| I'll tell people what this really means. | ||
| Remember, Francis is saying the culture of waste, the throw-away culture. | ||
| What this really means is how are the globalists going to ration energy and food under the guise that this is good for the climate, enforcing the communist global domination under the umbrella of the Great Reset. | ||
| Now, interesting enough, you pull back the curtain of this conference, and who is there? | ||
| Jeffrey Sachs is also going to be speaking there. | ||
| We know Jeffrey Sachs from the great work that's being done at the National Pulse and Natalie Winters. | ||
| He is the longtime collaborator of George Soros. | ||
| He is a China apologist, a CCP apologist, who recently criticized the doubling down and calling the genocide of the Uyghur people, saying that there's no proof and that the State Department should withdraw the term genocide. | ||
| This is the guy that has been behind the move, the globalist move, in the Vatican. | ||
| And, you know, Jeffrey Sachs, to remind your audience, is a socialist. | ||
| He's been promoting Bernie Sanders. | ||
| He invited Bernie Sanders at the Vatican. | ||
| Hey, Liz, hang on for a second. | ||
| I want to bring you over the break, and we've got to take a short break here for some commercials. | ||
| Also, we're going to bring in Saurabh Sharma, head of American Moment, a young fire-breathing populist. | ||
| Talk to us about where we are right now. | ||
| Okay, short commercial break. | ||
| Liz, you'll join us on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Okay, as Dr. McCullough told you, one way through the pandemic and to just better health is to boost your immune system. | ||
| Everybody knows you need to do this. | ||
| Go to WarmDefense.com. | ||
| Now you get the free vitamin D3 and the zinc, and you also get access to information about more about how you boost your immune system. | ||
| Remember, the work on oneself begins with oneself. | ||
| This whole show is about human agency. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| WarmDefense.com. | ||
| Also support Mike Lindell, the human, the armor-piercing shell. | ||
| That is the leader of this movement. | ||
| To get to the bottom of November 3rd, also the great manufacturing company up in Minnesota that's MyPillow, go to MyPillow.com, type in promo code WAROOM, support the War Room Posse, and you get up to 66% discounts, big sale on sheets, two for one, 40% off slippers and mugs, and go there today, support everybody. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Liz, you're what they're saying. | ||
| He said last week that the Pope Francis said the moral thing to do is take the vaccine, right? | ||
| Support Tony Fauci, take the vaccine. | ||
| And now they're implying the moral thing is going to be to getting back of all this climate change, that if you don't do it, not only you're not a good person, but you're an evil person. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| That's right. | ||
| This imposter papacy is giving the moral legitimacy to the great global reset. | ||
| And, you know, frankly, Steve, the only place in the world needing a great reset is the Francis Vatican, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| Well, we need to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| We love dealing with facts, Liz, as you know. | ||
| We need to get to the bottom of what's the secret treaty with the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| We need to see it. | ||
| We need to see all the codicils to it. | ||
| And we need to get to the bottom of this money laundering that authorities have arrested one of the people about laundering money, it appears, out of Peter's Pence in the Vatican into the West End of London, into high-end real estate. | ||
| Liz, how do people get access to you? | ||
| We're trying to get you back on tomorrow, going more detail, or Monday. | ||
| How do people get access to you in the interim, ma'am? | ||
| I'm everywhere, Gab, Twitter, Facebook, Elizabeth Yor, and my website's yourchildren.com. | ||
| Thank you, Liz Yor, you ultimate honey badger. | ||
| Thank you, ma'am. | ||
| Okay, we got, by the way, so a special programming note, I think the glorious MTG, I think, was kind of jumped on by people over in the house today. | ||
| She can't be with us. | ||
| We're trying to get some time to get over here. | ||
| She's going to be, we're going to try to get her on at five o'clock. | ||
| There's also an MSNBC, I think, interview we're going to try to get up at 5 o'clock with her. | ||
| A lot going on with Marjorie Taylor Greene, the firebrand populist. | ||
| We're going to get all that to you, all the breaking news and information about this throwdown she's had with AOC and what Nancy Pelosi's getting in the middle of. | ||
| So we'll get all of that information to you, make sure we get to all the facts. | ||
| I want to bring in, speaking of populists, a young fire-breathing populist, head of a new organization you need to know more about called American Moment. | ||
| Couldn't be better named. | ||
| Saurabh Sharma joins us. | ||
| Saurabh, Rich Lowry, not really a populist, but the editor of the Nash Review for many, many, I guess, decades now, has an article about why what Trump just did in backing Lee Stefanik is bad for populism. | ||
| Can you give us your observations and analysis of that piece, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think that Rich is concern trolling, to be entirely honest. | |
| He's coming in as an outsider, someone who always has opposed populists, has opposed the rise of populism over the last half decade, and is coming in and saying, well, if you really want populism to continue to exist, you have to oppose Trump, which is just utterly ridiculous. | ||
| I mean, people had tried before Trump came to maybe get the GOP to change its mind a little bit on things like tariffs, things like immigration, foreign policy, so on. | ||
| They all failed. | ||
| It was only through the advent of a guy named Donald Trump, who the base fundamentally believed were fighting for them, Were they able to take a new approach to these issues, take a new approach on trade, take a new approach on immigration, and so on. | ||
| And so the idea that now Trump is the enemy of this populist nationalist agenda is just a joke to me. | ||
| It started with him, and anyone who tries to remove him from the equation is just missing the point. | ||
| Can you tell us, we only got a couple of minutes, but your organization is so incredible and quite frankly you and your team are. | ||
| Take a couple of minutes, explain to us what American Moment is and why it was set up to kind of support the populist nationalist movement in this country and throughout the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, Steve. | |
| Well, last year I was looking around at sort of the term one of the Trump administration and trying to think about what went right and what went wrong. | ||
| And it was clear that one of the things that really went wrong was that the president did not have the personnel he needed in the White House, in the executive bureaucracies, to support the agenda that he believed in. | ||
| A president has a trillion things coming across his desk every single day when they're leading the country, and they have to rely on their deputies, sub-deputies, all the way down to the most junior of staffers at the State Department and so on in order to implement their agenda. When Trump came in, he brought the entire party with him, but he did not bring political elites in Washington with him. And they spent four years undermining him and subverting him out of return. That problem is not going away. Whether we get another President Trump, whether we get someone else who's a real fire breather and | ||
| understands where the movement's going, they're going to keep on getting subverted by these Washington insiders when it comes time to govern. And so what American Moment is set up to do is to build up over the next year, five years, 10 years, 15 years, a new cadre of capable, loyal, intelligent, solid on policy young people who are going to go in to the ranks of staffing in DC. | ||
| and be the sorts of people that are brought in in a presidential administration to help augment and force multiply the influence that a populist nationalist president can have. | ||
| Because without it, we're going to see a repeat of what happened under the Trump administration, where despite his best efforts, he was constantly undermined and constantly defeated in many cases by his own bureaucracy, despite his best efforts. | ||
| Okay, I want everybody in this audience, this reinforces something we've been talking about for months and months and months, and presenting people to you. | ||
| This movement is led by young people, this rising generation. | ||
| I'm telling you, they're like their grandparents' generation. | ||
| It's incredible. | ||
| We have a new greatest generation. | ||
| If you look at the signal, not the noise, we have a new greatest generation, and Saurabh Sharma is among the leaders of this. | ||
| Saurabh, how did they get to your website? | ||
| How did they find it? | ||
| I want everybody in this audience to pound in here today. | ||
| How did they get to your website? | ||
| How did they find out more about you and your social media? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you can go to AmericanMoment.org. | |
| You can find the links to everything we're doing. | ||
| We're doing original content. | ||
| Most of the work we're doing is behind the scenes. | ||
| I like to say that we're like an iceberg. | ||
| You only see 10% of it. | ||
| 90% is behind the scenes building up this group of young people and making sure they're as capable as humanly possible. | ||
| But AmericanMoment.org is our website. | ||
| You can find us on most social media platforms, you know, Twitter, Facebook, Parler, etc. | ||
| Rumble at ammoment.org. | ||
| If you search American Moment, you see those gears. | ||
| That's very much part of our branding. | ||
| You'll know that you've found the right organization. | ||
| Welcome people to join us, to be a part of us. | ||
| If you know young people who are looking to get involved who feel like there's no path for them to be involved in a place like Washington because all of the institutions here don't actually want people who believe in this agenda, who believe in anything at all, to be coming into the ranks of staffing, send them our way. | ||
| We're here to help. | ||
| We got a bounce. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| Look forward to having you back on, sir. | ||
| Great organization. | ||
| I want everybody to go check it out today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| A lot going on. | ||
| We're going to be back here at five big announcements on Arizona. | ||
| There's a lot going on in other states, and we're going to have notorious MTG with us at five o'clock. | ||
| She's being attacked over in Capitol Hill. |
Export Selection