May 8, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
47:51
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens, War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| Got a lot to get through. | ||
| We've got Michigan, Arizona, everything to get to the bottom of November 3rd. | ||
| Also in the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Now we want to bring in the War Room's 2020 Woman of the Year. | ||
| A hero. | ||
| Someone who left her country to come to the West to make sure that everybody knew exactly what was going on in mainland China, exactly what was going on in Wuhan, Exactly what Beijing was doing to save humanity. | ||
| And she left everything behind. | ||
| And she suffered, but she's starting to flourish here in the United States. | ||
| It's an incredible story of just heroism. | ||
| Dr. Li Min Yan. | ||
| Dr. Yan, you've seen now, you know, you came over here back in April, but you have been already in media getting this word out from mid-January, right? | ||
| And you've been, you know, you have been on Tucker and you've done War Room and you've done Tucker Carlson, you've gotten some tremendous media, but on the other hand you've been ripped apart by the defenders of the established order. | ||
| Ripped apart as you put out one white paper after the other. | ||
| Now that you see these stories coming out in the last 72 hours, Right? | ||
| That really say, hey, essentially you were right and you were right to warn the West from the beginning. | ||
| What is your sense of things right now? | ||
| Where we stand to actually getting to the truth and to the bottom of this, where we cannot go forward until we get to the bottom of exactly what happened in that lab. | ||
| What are your thoughts, ma'am? | ||
| Good morning, sir. | ||
| Okay, so I think now more and more people and also government and the Western, I mean, Western governments start to realize that the COVID-19 virus is not come from nature. | ||
| And what China government and also WHO and their scientists claimed are just some lies. | ||
| So, I'm happy to say this is a good progress, that people realize it comes from the lab, and also because of so many unusual features in the COVID-19 virus. | ||
| So, that means it's gain of function, and more evidence shows that it's not only gain of function, but also the non-traditional bioweapon, which I define as unrestricted bioweapon. | ||
| So the next step we are going to see is we need to examine the evidence whether this is a from the map accident, all intentionally released from Wuhan, and the water show behind the from the TLA military, which is AMMS. | ||
| And what are the other scientists overseas played in this kind of big big academic misinformation campaign. | ||
| And the next thing is we need to talk about how to hold the Chinese Communist Party and those people accountable. | ||
| Before the accountability, we'll get there in a second, but what would you... | ||
| Jen Psaki yesterday just said, hey, we support an international group under WHO to go in and get into the lab, which they've already had and it's a disaster. | ||
| What would Dr. Li Min Yan, what would you recommend today that the West should do about getting to the Wuhan lab and getting to the bottom of what happened? | ||
| What would be your recommendation? | ||
| I think before you clearly remove the Chinese Communist Party, there is no way you'll get a thorough investigation from the lab controlled by China. | ||
| But there is something else you can do. | ||
| That means you can start from the scientists in your own countries. | ||
| And follow the money, follow their academic records and see who are behind them. | ||
| Ask them to do something to promote nature origin theory and also who's spreading misinformation to prevent the efficient measurement and also management of this pandemic. | ||
| In the West, we should know that not only about the origin, but also about the scale of the misinformation is very, very important, because these are all part of Chinese unrestricted biowarfare. | ||
| Is there any doubt in your mind, Dr. Li Min Yang, as you've seen and you were the first person in the West really to contact, you were ordered to contact the Beijing CDC on December 31st of 2019 about what was going on in Wuhan. | ||
| Is there any doubt as you've looked at the data, as you looked at the evidence, as you've looked at the kind of paper flow? | ||
| That Dr. Fauci and the people at NIH have a lot to answer for. | ||
| They have to come forward with all the information about their involvement with Wuhan, with their involvement with the Batwoman in Wuhan. | ||
| They have to come forward with everything about the gain-of-function experiments that they financed and allowed Wuhan to do. | ||
| Are you convinced that Dr. Fauci is somehow involved in this? | ||
| Sir, you should know that Dr. Fauci is one of the biggest guys controlling the money to support such zoonotic emerging infectious disease investigations all over the world. | ||
| And among all these labs who get fundings, my lab in the University of Hong Kong, the WHO reference lab controlled by Professor Manik Peres. | ||
| And also the labs under China CDC, including WIV, the biggest ones to get such money from US. | ||
| So only from this, you can say that, only from this evidence, you should understand that Dr. Fauci is quite close with these people. | ||
| And also, yes, there are other evidence point to that. | ||
| Last thing, Dr. Yan, you said about holding the Chinese Communist Party accountable. | ||
| We had Elise Stefanik in here and Josh Hawley on two separate occasions. | ||
| They sponsored a bill in Congress to start to get to the bottom of that, to start to say these guys got to be held responsible both for the deaths and financially. | ||
| What would you recommend? | ||
| Because you're from mainland China and you've been under the suppression of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| What would you recommend? | ||
| How can the world begin to start to hold the Chinese Communist Party accountable for what happened in Wuhan and what happened in the days and weeks after when they exacerbated this problem? | ||
| I think the key point here is why U.S. | ||
| and other countries cannot respond quickly is because people are too kind. | ||
| This is also explained in that textbook from PLA. | ||
| They know people in the West and most of people, even our Chinese people, are too innocent, too kind to understand this kind of evilness. | ||
| So the thing is, people need to understand the illness of Chinese Communist Party, not only about the COVID-19 pandemic, but also about their thinking style and their behaviors in the past, and they will understand what they will do in the future. | ||
| So this relies on the media, and also the government should hold a very efficient policy and maybe get the new laws to know how to, you know, put Chinese Communist Party accountable in a short time. | ||
| Meanwhile, people like Dr. Fauci and also like those CDC heads, if they don't want to promote efficient management, like the drugs as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, all these things, but only promote vaccines, Dr. Yan, how do people follow you on Twitter? | ||
| Investigated they should tell people why and not say I people understand and use the cheap and the safe drug Instead of the quick develop the vaccine to this pandemic. | ||
| Why do they do this to waste people's life? | ||
| Dr. Yan how do people follow you on Twitter how they get access to you your white papers all the work you've been doing in this area Okay, so my paper actually is difficult to be found because Chinese Communist Party use cyber military to Did some tricks in the novel, but they always can found it from my Twitter the pin tweet I list all the links of my three reports, and my Twitter is | ||
| Dr. Li Meng Yan just searched my name and to note, I mean, there are over 10 accounts, I mean, fake accounts established by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So follow the one with 87,000 followers. | ||
| That's the only real one. | ||
| By the way, if you want to get a laugh, you've got to see what they do. | ||
| The Wu-Mao 50-Cent Army goes after our beloved Dr. Yan every day in the most vicious way possible. | ||
| She sends it to me, and you've got to laugh because you'll cry otherwise. | ||
| Dr. Yan, that's why you're a hero. | ||
| You refused to back down, and you've been a beacon of hope and a beacon of strength for so many people throughout the world. | ||
| I want to thank you for coming on the show today. | ||
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| You, too, and everyone here are heroes, too. | ||
| Thank you, Dr. Ian. | ||
| And Dave, before I bring Rahim in, she gets to the other point, and I know you've talked about this to me from the very beginning when you came on the show in early 2020. | ||
| You've got these other things out there, and at least ought to be explored as therapeutics. | ||
| Therapeutics here, you know, hydroxychloroquine used in other situations, ivermectin. | ||
| You've got these other things to prove it, and it was just all now vaccine. | ||
| The other thing, the very first show we had in the, what, second week of January, we had Dr. Hadfield, who eventually went to the White House to work on this, but he walked us through herd immunity. | ||
| And the herd immunity at that time, because they're thinking it was like that, in fact, Dr. Hadfield said, look, it's going to be at least 5, 10, 15 years before you get a vaccine. | ||
| So you've got to think about therapeutics, but you also got to think about herd immunity, about who gets it and what the number is. | ||
| In all the discussion we have today, there's no discussion about people that have had the virus and have antibodies or T-cells and about that calculation of herd immunity. | ||
| Is that, Dave? | ||
| Because they do think it's a weapon and it's been weaponized and that's what these mutations are. | ||
| You got the mutations in India, you got all these different mutations. | ||
| Why are they just not including people that have had the virus in the calculation of herd immunity? | ||
| Why is it only the vaccines? | ||
| What's your thinking on that? | ||
| No, it's a good question, Steve. | ||
| I think the answer, the real quick answer is they want to, you know, play it cheap. | ||
| Because to really determine the people who've gotten infected, I'm looking at the paper published in It's a journal of clinical investigation. | ||
| It's on the NIH website. | ||
| It says recent endemic coronavirus infection is associated with less severe COVID-19. | ||
| Because before COVID-19, there are other circulating coronaviruses and anyone exposed to it develops T cell immunity, but that's only found out through a blood test. | ||
| But guess what? | ||
| That's a seroprevalence test in technical terms. | ||
| But what's happening, not just in America, but around the world, most of the tests have been the swab tests, which have been, it's inaccurate. | ||
| A lot of false positives. | ||
| And that's where you got that cycle threshold, you know, that is spinning this thing. | ||
| Even the inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kerry Mullis, who unfortunately passed away last year, said it was a terrible thing to determine viruses. | ||
| He was brutal. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| He was brutal. | ||
| He was particularly brutal on Fauci. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Because he said, the more you spin this thing because it's a centrifuge, the more you're picking up viral fragments. | ||
| And that's what Dr. Hatfield, too, said last year. | ||
| So it's picking up viral fragments from people who have been exposed to the virus, who recovered, and who are asymptomatic. | ||
| But these people have been falsely categorized as positive, and that's what I call It's resulted in this case fortification. | ||
| Huge increase in cases but at least 80% of people anywhere around the world and now studies are corroborating it. | ||
| On the NIH website? | ||
| On the NIH website where people are getting the virus but you know they're not displaying any symptoms. | ||
| I mean their immune system is fighting it and back to Dr. Jan's point and this is one of those regulatory bottlenecks in the US and Western Europe The very fact that you can emergency authorize a vaccine requires that there's no therapeutic options be available. | ||
| But the rest of the world is not like that. | ||
| Like in India, for example, last year they did great. | ||
| And the recent surge you're seeing is when India completely abandoned therapeutics to purely focus on vaccines. | ||
| I mean, like you, I'm not anti-vax. | ||
| I've received vaccines. But the point is we gotta give people what I call the genius of the end. | ||
| Why the tyranny of the or? Let's give people vaccines and therapeutics and masks. | ||
| Is that part of the problem, Indi? Because people talk about bio weapons and all that. | ||
| Is part of it that they went off to hydroxy? They've been big on therapeutics and then they've switched to vaccines? | ||
| Till January this year, they switched to vaccines and remdesivir exclusively. | ||
| And remember, you had Dr. Harvey Richon last year, Dr. Zelenko. | ||
| All of them stated the virus, if it's not treated early on, and if people are just given like Tylenol or Advil, it just gets progressively worse. | ||
| So you catch or you prevent hospitalizations by treating early through therapeutics. | ||
| But many people in America and also in Western Europe have not even been given that option. | ||
| And that's a regulatory issue. | ||
| It's also a regulatory issue, but it's a profit issue. | ||
| It's a profit issue. | ||
| The vaccines are toning in as far as cash, and the therapeutics cost you pennies. | ||
| Yeah, pennies, like Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, it's like one cent, two cents a pill. | ||
| You're not going to make big profits from that. | ||
| I hate to get so crass and talk about the money. | ||
| Okay, we're going to turn in a second. | ||
| Dave Ramaswamy and Rahim Kassam. | ||
| Rahim's going to walk us through The Great Reckoning. | ||
| November 3rd in Wuhan. | ||
| It's happening and it's starting to come unwound. | ||
| And by the way, when it starts to come unwound, they're only going to get crazier. | ||
| OK? | ||
| All next with Rahim Kassam. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, the show's on fire, and the show's on fire because of my in-studio co-host, our guest, and of course we've got the great Rahim Kassam. | ||
| Rahim has been on a special assignment this week, working on a number of things, but one thing he's been working on is an amazing I guess it's going to be a special, about two hours long, in Hunter Biden's own voice about his journey by his book. | ||
| And the book is a payoff. | ||
| $2 million advance. | ||
| It's sold, I think right now, under 20,000 copies in four weeks. | ||
| I think it's 19,800 copies. | ||
| It cost Simon Schuster millions of dollars. | ||
| CBS, right? | ||
| This is a total bribe. | ||
| This is just a payoff to the Biden family. | ||
| It's a disgrace. | ||
| When that same company, the same company canceled Josh Hawley's book, To talk about putting these oligarchs, you know, trust busting and to think that that company did a brazen and broad daylight payoff. | ||
| 19,000 books on a thing that spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of marketing, a $2 million advance. | ||
| It's disgusting. | ||
| This is nothing more than a kickback and a payoff to bribe. | ||
| It's a bribe to the Biden family. | ||
| And to know that Joe Biden's sitting there, that clown, and he is a clown. | ||
| OK, that clown sitting there and allowing this to happen and allowing the kid to take the money. | ||
| So, I want to turn now to Rahim. | ||
| Rahim, you've been working on this, you can give us a highlight of that, but I want to get into this Great Reckoning, because the Daily Mail and others, of all these stories that are coming up about the Wuhan lab, in the middle of this, the Daily Mail has an exclusive with Hunter Biden about the Chinese spies. | ||
| Patrick Ho, he's saying the number one spy in China, and he's got now Chinese women involved in it, and it's disgusting. | ||
| But talk about quickly about what you're doing about this whole presentation you're going to make in his own voice, and then I want to get into your concept of the Great Reckoning. | ||
| Yeah, look, I just think it's incredibly important that people understand who this person is, what was going on in his life, who had access to the son of the Vice President of the United States while he was lobbying, while he was out there, you know, working with, in his own words, the effing spy chief of China, while he was tied up with Burisma. | ||
| And I've gone through the book twice now. | ||
| It's that bad. | ||
| There are so many moments that require unpacking and unpicking that I can't wait to do it in, you know, a two hour special in his own words. | ||
| But I'll tell you something, looking through this Daily Mail article about this, you know, honey trap, whatever she was, this all goes back to CEFC, the Chinese energy company, Patrick Ho, all of the stuff we talked about before the election. | ||
| And I go to the bottom of this Daily Mail article, and I'll tell you, It's very hard to not get angry when you read a whole blurb that says, authenticating the laptop, and then it says, you know, in conclusion, the operating system timestamps appear to be authentic, no evidence was found to suggest that anything has been altered or manufactured, etc, etc. | ||
| Why they couldn't do this before the election, I have, you know, no idea, but it's incredibly frustrating. | ||
| Good for them now for going through it, but it's a little late. | ||
| Yeah, they had every accent. | ||
| By the way, the reason they didn't do it, they understood that that would flip enough votes that even they couldn't have stolen it, right? | ||
| I want to go now to the Great Reckoning. | ||
| We've said, the watchword on this show is that we can't go forward until you get to the bottom of the Wuhan lab in 19, until you get to the bottom of 3 November. | ||
| You cannot make progress because those are such monumental events in modern history, modern world history, just not American history. | ||
| They have, you have to, you gotta do a data-based, evidence-based, science-based, get to the bottom of it. | ||
| I've seen in the last 72 hours, ladies and gentlemen, and we're pretty good about picking up the signal, not the noise, there's a shift underway. | ||
| And this shift is principally on the Wuhan lab, but you're seeing it also in the vote. | ||
| And you're seeing this because the Justice Department and people playing slow-walking things, they're very nervous. | ||
| But on this Wuhan lab, Rahim, walk us through this concept of the Great Reckoning and what is happening among Forward-thinking people, smart people that realize that something's got to change here about the origins of this virus. | ||
| Well, you know, how long have we been been saying that the the walls will close in the walls are closing in on Fauci on dash check and all of the people that have that have run interference for the Chinese Communist Party and help the Chinese Communist Party get to the place that it was at. When this when this whole thing leaked out, look, I want to turn people's attentions to an article that's been published in the bulletin dot org. That's the bulletin of the atomic scientists. | ||
| These are the people who do the, you know, seconds to midnight racing every year to great fanfare. And they're not exactly right wingers. In fact, they are they are no, no, no. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to say this. | |
| This is not the War Room, this is not National Pulse, this is not Breitbart, this is not Citizens Free Press, okay? | ||
| These are guys that have been doing this for years. | ||
| Top scientists, and they're very politicized, but they're the guys like it's three seconds to midnight with the atomic weapons, right? | ||
| No, the Doomsday Clock. | ||
| Armageddon, counting down to Armageddon. | ||
| This is the Doomsday Clock, guys, correct, Rahim? | ||
| I mean, this is guys that would disagree with us on everything on planet Earth, correct? | ||
| Yeah, so the author of this piece is a long-term New York Times writer by the name of Nicholas Wade, a multi-time author, spent decades and decades over at the New York Times, and has published this piece uh... in the in the budget of the atomic scientists have been there with me through this is our i just want to read this to you and and let the audience make up their own minds at this says quote another reason perhaps is the migration of the media toward the left of the political spectrum | ||
| Because President Trump said the virus had escaped from a Wuhan lab, editors gave the idea little credence. | ||
| They joined the virologists in regarding lab escape as a dismissible conspiracy theory. | ||
| During the Trump administration, they had no trouble in rejecting the position of the intelligence services that lab escape could not be ruled out. | ||
| But when Avril Haines, President Biden's Director of National Intelligence, said the same thing, She too was largely ignored. | ||
| That is not to argue that editors should have endorsed a lab escape scenario, merely they should have explored the possibility fully and fairly. | ||
| People around the world who have been pretty much confined to their homes for the last year might like a better answer than their media are giving them. | ||
| Perhaps one will emerge in time. | ||
| After all, the more months pass without the natural emergence theory gaining a shred of supporting evidence, the less plausible it may seem. | ||
| Perhaps the international community of virologists will come to be seen as a false and self-interested guide. | ||
| The common sense perception that a pandemic breaking out in Wuhan might have something to do with a Wuhan lab cooking up novel viruses of maximal danger in unsafe conditions could eventually displace the ideological insistence that whatever Trump said can't be true and then let the reckoning begin. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Nicholas Wade there, former chief science writer of the New York Times, writing the Bulletin of Atomic Science. | ||
| So Rahim, you've seen other articles, and Dave, jump in here, picking up. | ||
| When you say the Great Reckoning, Rahim, what do you think he's talking about, and does this tie in with your concept of the walls closing in on Fauci and Dasik? | ||
| And I've got to say something, people have got to understand this. | ||
| The National Pulse has been absolutely at the tip of the spear. | ||
| Raheem Kassam and Natalie Winters have done more than any institution, right? | ||
| Nuwar has just been glad to be able to get it up here and use it as a platform to amplify it. | ||
| But the National Pulse, you guys have been the laboring oar in this from the very beginning. | ||
| What does he mean when he says the Great Reckoning? | ||
| And what do you mean about the walls closing in on Dasik and Fauci? | ||
| Well, the reckoning very clearly from Wade's article, and we're going to have a pricey up of it up on the national polls. | ||
| We'll link to the whole thing for those who can, you know, stomach the full 4,000 words of this. | ||
| He's talking about a reckoning on all sides. | ||
| He's talking about a reckoning in the media, a reckoning in politics, a reckoning in the scientific community, a reckoning in diplomatic terms, a reckoning geopolitically, a reckoning financially. | ||
| All of that will, you know, there are now massive question marks above all of it and all of the institutions and the individuals that govern those institutions. | ||
| But let me just remind the audience very quickly that Washington, D.C. | ||
| and the politics of Washington, D.C. | ||
| operate pretty much like a badly written soap opera. | ||
| So what you're going to see over the next 10 to 15 days is this probably somebody in the media, maybe Chris Silliza or maybe it will be a New York Times editorial that suggests finally that Fauci has some tough questions to answer. | ||
| That will be their first foray into this, I suspect. | ||
| And after that, you will start to see people like Fauci try and throw people like Daschuk under the bus. | ||
| That will take us another probably two, three weeks of a news cycle to get us to that point. | ||
| After that, I suspect the political and the scientific establishments will try and hide He won't be on television every day. | ||
| He won't be making misstatements every five minutes and not being held accountable to it. | ||
| And then after that, you will start to get the real push. | ||
| So I still think we're two or three months, really, away from a full reckoning for people like Fauci. | ||
| But it's the drip, drip, drip that you'll see now over the course of the next two or three months that will get us to the position of the wars finally closing on that fraud. | ||
| We've got a couple of minutes in this, like two minutes, but I need to hold you over for a few minutes. | ||
| We're going to have Matt DiPerna and other things about the fraud. | ||
| But I've got to ask you this question. | ||
| Peter Navarro said it earlier, and Dave Ramasamy, I think, was agreeing with him, that the way that he's reading this now, and Navarro's gone through all these documents, he thinks they're teeing up Dasik to be the initial fall guy for this. | ||
| Do you agree, and why do you agree? | ||
| Yeah, no, I think he was always meant to be a fall guy. | ||
| I've said some pretty mean things about him and I stand by all of them. | ||
| He's not a particularly intelligent person. | ||
| He's not smooth. | ||
| He's not slick. | ||
| He thinks he is because he's got this entire apparatus around him that kind of protects him from any scrutiny. | ||
| But as soon as those defenses are kind of left to fall, Or brought down around him, whether it's from the WHO side of things, the CCP side of things, the American government side of things, the British government side of things. | ||
| Then Daszak will find himself very lonely on an island and will take all of the incoming. | ||
| That'll be what people like Fauci prefer to happen in this scenario, to claim that somebody like Daszak was a rogue element, a rogue actor, and has really, really done a massive disservice to science and the scientific community. | ||
| That'll be their first attempt. | ||
| To save themselves. | ||
| I absolutely agree with that. | ||
| And Dasik's the perfect form guy. | ||
| He's just a guy who belongs in a dunce hat. | ||
| Okay, we're taking a short commercial break. | ||
| We're going to bring Raheem Kassam back for a few minutes on the other side of this. | ||
| I've just got to get some more questions in on this fascinating topic. | ||
| And this Great Reckoning is on two-fold. | ||
| It's on November 3rd, and it's what happened in Wuhan. | ||
| And it's all happening, and it's going to converge into one thing. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Short commercial break. | ||
| We're returning with Raheem. | ||
| We've got Matt DiPerna in Michigan. | ||
| Much, much more as The War Room continues. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, so support the armor-piercing shell that is Mike Lindell. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Type in promo code War Room. | ||
| You get all the discounts. | ||
| Get there. | ||
| You've got the Giza sheets. | ||
| You've got the slippers. | ||
| Big sales on all that. | ||
| But across the board, you get discounts and up to 66% on some products. | ||
| So go there today. | ||
| You have not slept. | ||
| You've slept with a MyPillow from Mike Lindell and also on those Giza sheets. | ||
| and then get up in the morning like Rahim does, put those slippers on and he feels like a new man, a new Rahim. | ||
| Rahim, right before I come to you, Dave Ramaswamy, you've... | ||
| Do you have the Mao photo up? Let me quickly comment on that. | ||
| You're saying, you're saying the... you've got the comments now from the Atomic Bulletin? | ||
| Yeah, Steve, just to add to what Rahim said... | ||
| Let me just say a couple of things. | ||
| This is a U.S. | ||
| State Department cable from January 19, 2018, which says, in its current, the productivity of the Wuhan lab is limited by a shortage of the highly trained technicians and investigators required to safely operate a P4 lab. | ||
| And the article, the bulletin, which Rahim referred to, by the way, that's a photo of Chairman Mao, October 1st, 1949, saying two weeks to flatten the curve. | ||
| So you know the State Department cable essentially corroborates what's mentioned in the article saying they have a lack of safe investigators and technicians so and that there's a Nature Magazine article from 2015 saying there's chimeric viruses gain of function being performed in Wuhan Before they were a P4 lab. | ||
| And the article mentions this very scary fact, which because this P4 lab was under development, most of the gain-of-function research was being done in a BSL P2 lab, which is the same safety as a dentist's office. | ||
| Let people wrap that around their head. | ||
| Disgusting. | ||
| You're only as strong as your weakest link. | ||
| And then a scientist, a bioinformatics specialist and statistics specialist has done what I call the genetic fingerprint of the virus. | ||
| He says there's a direct correlation between the subway train running from the P4 lab to Wuhan Airport and all the hospitalizations along the subway line. | ||
| This is, when we get to the bottom of this, and that cable came from a guy in the consulate in Wuhan. | ||
| Wuhan, remember, is a huge medical center for the PLA. | ||
| Has been for, historically, since the 40s. | ||
| And, a guy from the embassy in Beijing, who was worried enough that the consulate called him, they made a trip down there, they spent a day at the lab, and then sent this cable, which Tony Fauci was a information addy on. | ||
| We're going to get to all this information in the days and weeks ahead. | ||
| And one thing to add to Dr. Jan's statement, and this is very key, right? | ||
| The whole concept of civil-military fusion. | ||
| Big time. | ||
| So when you have civil-military fusion, testing a bioweapon in a large city of 11 million people is like testing a nuke in a large city just to see what happens. | ||
| This is about the accountability. | ||
| We've got to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| Rahim, just one last thing. | ||
| I want you to just quickly, we're pressed for time, but just go through how you think, we're trying to give signal not noise and put people on the other side of the hill. | ||
| How do you think this thing plays out? | ||
| The great reckoning on this issue, how do you think it plays out over the next couple of weeks? | ||
| Yeah, well, like I said, look, there's now going to be, especially given the words of Nicholas Wade in this, and this is being widely read right now, this article, I mean, shared by some real players here in Washington, D.C. | ||
| and in the media, in the media markets across the country, indeed, across the world. | ||
| And for it to end, what I read you was the conclusion for it to end with a with an almost condemnation of the of the left media. | ||
| I mean, he identifies it as the left media of editors. | ||
| You know, I think I said on the show right last week or two weeks ago, you don't necessarily have a reporter problem, you have an editor problem. | ||
| Big time. | ||
| And when he says, let the reckoning begin, I mean, that implies that... Wade wouldn't go out and say this unless he knew that it was being talked about in some very serious circles, about the questions that are going to be asked of Fauci, of the official narratives and all of that. | ||
| Now, we and this audience knows those questions like the back of their hands. | ||
| They've heard us talk about them for over a year now. | ||
| Um, but I suspect there will be an authoritative, as far as the establishment is concerned, an authoritative source like the New York Times or CNN or whatever, something that they read and that they listen to that will ask some tough questions. | ||
| And those questions will go right to the heart of the beginning of all of this, which is gain of function, Dr. Fauci, how it all began. | ||
| And at that point, they try and throw somebody under the bus. | ||
| Now, I'm going to tell you, Raheem, we're going to let you go, and I know the National Pulse, you're going to appreciate this article. | ||
| I know you guys are going to be all over this because you've been at the tip of the spear, but here's what's shocking. | ||
| When the Newsmax, when Emeril from Newsmax asked Saki, I think Saki didn't know what she was talking about. | ||
| I mean, this is shocking. | ||
| Normally, you can tell when she's giving the limp leg or trying to spin out. | ||
| Circle back. | ||
| She was like, that's a Grundon question. | ||
| Go ask the Grundon's over thing. | ||
| That's a staff question. | ||
| Go ask the staff. | ||
| She does not understand how this is the center of everything. | ||
| And that, to me, is pretty shocking about how undialed in the Biden administration, in that White House, in that West Wing, they used to talk about Trump. | ||
| Hey, that is like isolated from reality. | ||
| She did not know even the construct of the question. | ||
| She just said, that's something you should go ask. | ||
| NIH. | ||
| Raheem Kassam, when is this story going to be up, your pre-see of this article? | ||
| Yeah, in about 30 minutes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll just say this about the White House team at the moment. | |
| You know, they've been slapping each other and themselves on the back over the course of this past week just for the fact that they've managed to get this man over the 100-day mark. | ||
| So they've got no interest in policy. | ||
| They've got no interest in detail. | ||
| That's very clear across the board, by the way. | ||
| It's clear in the jobs numbers. | ||
| It's clear in everything they're doing. | ||
| Clear on the border. | ||
| They have absolutely no intention of servicing any of the concerns that even the left-wing pollsters describe as the concerns of ordinary Americans. | ||
| So I'm not surprised that Psaki isn't across, you know, the knowledge filters on the lab, on NIH and any of that. | ||
| And it will be their own ignorance through their own arrogance that eventually leads to the downfall of Biden and Biden's regime around him and all of the people that have committed to aiding and abetting the Chinese Communist Party throughout this whole thing. | ||
| I think the Greeks called this hubris, didn't they? | ||
| I think they had a term for that in the tragedies. | ||
| Okay, Rahim, about your podcast, about National Pulse, about you on your social media, how do people get to you? | ||
| Yeah, I'm Rahim Kassam on everything. | ||
| You can find me on all of them, Telegram, Gab. | ||
| Sadly, it's still Twitter, but we need to push the information out to as many people as possible. | ||
| Follow us on all of those things, and you can help contribute to our investigations at fundrealnews.com. | ||
| Raheem Kassam, got a hot podcast. | ||
| Thank you very much for taking the time. | ||
| By the way, he's done an epic job on Hunter Biden. | ||
| The story only gets more complicated. | ||
| We're going to have all that. | ||
| We're going to figure out when we're going to do this two-hour special with Raheem and his team. | ||
| I think Mike McCormick's part of it, too, who knows the Bidens very well. | ||
| So, Raheem, great work. | ||
| We're going to get to that shortly. | ||
| I want to bring in now Matt DiPerno, another one of these warriors. | ||
| Remember, DiPerno's journey is interesting because he started with, I think, a guy who didn't get re-elected or didn't get elected to the school board and thought something was fishy up in Antrim County, Michigan. | ||
| Now it's become a national story. | ||
| It's going to be one of the centerpieces of getting to the bottom of November 3rd. | ||
| Now Matt, I think you've done another filing, but before I do that, I call it shots fired in Arizona as they're going back and forth now with just nasty letters. | ||
| The Maricopa County just sent back to the State Senate, I think, saying, hey, look, we sent you everything we got, and we sent you everything we're going to send you, right? | ||
| And we got this router situation, now you got a sheriff involved, you guys are asking that you're going to disrupt public security, and it turns out the routers for the information go everywhere. | ||
| So, this thing gets murkier and murkier, but the State Senate has taken a firm position and said, hey, we're in charge of this, not the Justice Department. | ||
| This is a state issue, not a federal issue, and you're going to do the following. | ||
| The Justice Department, I think, is teeing up. | ||
| They're coming for a TRO, and they're trying to shut this whole thing down, or at least delay it. | ||
| And, I think in addition, you've got the implication that the Justice Department letter, and Sonny Borelli, the Senator up there, agreed with me. | ||
| It implies that if you're a citizen working on this, and the canvassing piece, and remember, the canvas is as important as the count, okay? | ||
| They're implying you're going to have criminal charges brought on you. | ||
| So Matt, what do you think of what's happening in Arizona? | ||
| How does it relate to the grind that you're doing and you're grinding through the court system up in Michigan? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, we see a lot of similarities, actually, with what's happening in Arizona. | |
| In Antrim County, we've seen the county actually hide the fact that they purchased 17 USB external modems. | ||
| They hid that from us, didn't tell us about it. | ||
| And we see a lot of the same issues in the canvassing board that we see in Arizona right now. | ||
| Just a complete failure with the canvassing board to actually verify truthful and legitimate results. | ||
| As you go through, and I want to talk about your finals, but as you go through the system, are you getting any support from the Republican-controlled, you know, state legislature? | ||
| And I understand you're up against the government up there, you know, Whitmer and this crowd that absolutely do not want you to succeed going forward. | ||
| What's the political situation up there as you're grinding through the courts? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, actually we get more resistance from the Republicans in the state of Michigan. | |
| Three in particular, Senate Majority Leader Sharkey, Senator Ed McGroom, and Senator Baezan are our biggest opponents in this. | ||
| We believe it's because they were part of the group that appropriated the money to purchase these machines in 2017 and don't have the courage to stand up and acknowledge that they did something wrong. | ||
| And also, I've been told by them that they believe that having Joe Biden as president right now helps them win re-election in 2022. | ||
| So, can you walk us through, boy, I know our audience is going to love that. | ||
| Can you walk through what's the latest filings and where we actually stand with your case? | ||
| Because everybody's focused on you as one of the most important cases in this entire situation to get to the bottom of November 3rd. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hearing on Monday where the Secretary of State and the county have filed a motion to dismiss the case claiming that my client does not have standing to pursue his claims. | |
| Michigan's a little different than other states though because in 2018 We amended our Constitution to state that any person who voted in the election has standing to challenge the results of the election statewide. | ||
| So we believe we should prevail on that argument. | ||
| But what we put out yesterday in a response to those motions, we did a deep dive into Antrim County and looked at the actual 15 different townships or precincts. | ||
| And what we found was that we discovered that there were 1,061 votes that were counted in this election that do not appear in the actual voter rolls published by the Secretary of State. | ||
| We also found out that when we look at the number of people who voted by age group, and we put these graphs out yesterday too, I also posted them on my Twitter account this morning, the graphs for each precinct, near 100% voter turnout for people ages 65 through 80. | ||
| That's a big number for people turning out in that age group. | ||
| And we also saw a huge percentage of ballots, absentee ballots, mailed to people at P.O. | ||
| boxes in the county. | ||
| Matt, we'd like you to stay over the break because we've got a couple more questions, but we've got about a minute here. | ||
| I thought I heard like a hundred times your Secretary of State saying she's reviewed everything, everything was okay, and gadflies like you don't know what you're talking about and are continually giving misinformation about the system that was run that was totally perfect in Michigan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, actually her quote is that this was the safest election in the history of the country and that anything that happened in Antrim County was the result of human error. | |
| Yeah, I've been told that I've actually purchased all the tinfoil that's available in the state and there's a shortage right now. | ||
| But the reality is, based on the actual information that we have put out, her statements were false. | ||
| We've moved to amend our complaint to include straight-up fraud charges against the Secretary of State for lying to people. | ||
| Lying to the American people, lying to the people in the state of Michigan for her false comments. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break and return with the heroic Matt DiPerno taking on the system up in Michigan. | ||
| We return in The War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Okay, let's go back to Michigan and Matt DiPerno. | ||
| Matt, on Monday, what do you think, what's their argument going to be to shut you down? | ||
| What's your counter-argument and what do you think the odds are here you progress through this next wicket? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the argument is that a voter doesn't have standing to challenge the election in the state of Michigan. | |
| We disagree with that because in 2018 there was a constitutional amendment that stated that any person who votes has the right to challenge the election in the state of Michigan and it's self-executing. | ||
| So we think we'll prevail on that, but, you know, I don't know. | ||
| I mean, I'm not a judge. | ||
| It's not the decision I make, but I think we got to Great chance of surviving on Monday. | ||
| How do people support you? | ||
| How do people get access to the information? | ||
| You've become a real hero of this movement and obviously Michigan, you know, it's Arizona today but it's heading to Georgia and it's going to get to Michigan. | ||
| How do people support you? | ||
| How do people get access to what's going on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, you can follow me on Twitter at MDPerno, M-D-E-P-E-R-N-O. | |
| Check out my website, dpernolaw.com. | ||
| We're putting everything up real time that we're filing and giving people the actual information so that they can see it. | ||
| I'll tell you this, since we put out that video last week, last Monday, showing how we can flip votes on the system, Still, not one Michigan newspaper or news site reporting anything that we're doing, keeping it a total blackout. | ||
| But people can follow us that way. | ||
| Check out my website. | ||
| Check out my Twitter account. | ||
| You'll be able to see all the information. | ||
| Is that because you think the intimidation of the media has been very aggressive in this area? | ||
| Right? | ||
| And remember, we're not machine guys, but it's a fascinating video. | ||
| I think we put it up on the website. | ||
| Why would no news service in Michigan at least come and try to poke holes in it? | ||
| Nobody? | ||
| Detroit Free Press? | ||
| None of the local stations? | ||
| Nobody's had it up? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no one will cover it. | |
| I believe it's because they don't have permission from the government to cover that story. | ||
| I don't think it's because they're afraid of dominion necessarily. | ||
| I think they're just aligned with the State Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Governor. | ||
| I think that's what it comes down to. | ||
| They certainly publicize everything she wants to do in this case. | ||
| She puts out a press release, they cover it. | ||
| If she wants to do a news conference, they cover it. | ||
| And they silence us in every way. | ||
| Did the Republican leadership contact you or the technician that was doing it and ask for a demonstration, an in-person demonstration? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, they haven't contacted us at all. | |
| We've contacted them and I know hundreds, even thousands of people have called their office this week, not one single response. | ||
| You would think that these were people of courage who'd stand up and say, hey, we need to really check this out and verify what's happening, but not one single phone call from anyone in the Michigan government. | ||
| Matt DiPerna, thank you very much and thank you for the fight that you're leading up there in Michigan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I appreciate it. | |
| Thanks for having me on. | ||
| Brother Ramaswamy, pretty stunning, given everything we've seen. | ||
| Your understanding of technology is, and like I said, we're not machine guys, but that demonstration was huge. | ||
| You would think people would be all over this. | ||
| Steve, that goes to show the similarity between what we're seeing domestically and internationally is the manager industrial complex in cahoots with the media industrial complex to block inconvenient truths from the American people. | ||
| And, you know, I give a football analogy. | ||
| You know, back in the day when there were not a bunch of cameras in the field, just the ref, you know, plays were called and fouls were called and then people in the stadium just flipped out because they saw the play a completely different way. | ||
| So now we have 30, 100, 200 cameras in the field. | ||
| It's like everyone's seeing the tape. | ||
| We don't need journalists. | ||
| We don't need partisan hacks who interfere. | ||
| You're saying modern information technology has allowed us to disintermediate the guardians? | ||
| Yes, absolutely. | ||
| And the bulletin article that Rahim enumerated is a perfect example because that's a highly technical document. | ||
| Which has quotations by virologists, scientists at Stanford University, other advanced universities. | ||
| Compare these people to your average mainstream media journalists. | ||
| I mean that's like asking a masseuse to comment on a scan of a brain lesion. | ||
| Like, what are they going to say? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, we need technical experts. | |
| And same thing here. | ||
| I mean, this is like complicated stuff. | ||
| And we have, what I call, there's a difference between office space, you know, people who sit behind a desk and pass judgments on all kinds of events and phenomena that they have no idea what's going on, versus people in the field like Matt DiPerno, whoever, all across America, in fact, the rest of the world, where people | ||
| Like doctors, like, you know, if doctors in the field are prescribing something, you have some doctor in an office, you know, with paper stacked to the wall saying no. | ||
| And by the way, Steve, there's a precedent to this. | ||
| I mean, I'll give two examples. | ||
| When vitamin C, the age of exploration, you know, it was discovered by a British doctor that the vitamin C cured scurvy, which killed millions of sailors. | ||
| Guess how much time it took from the discovery of that fact to the actual implementation of giving oranges and lemons in the British Navy? | ||
| Like 1753 to 1794. | ||
| We don't have that kind of time. | ||
| You know, there's millions of lives at stake now. | ||
| So I think this is what I call the foreturning. | ||
| We're seeing a complete reshift and rethink in everything where you have very empowered citizens who can go straight to the tip. | ||
| They see the play. | ||
| They can call the play. | ||
| They don't need somebody in mainstream media like who are They're corrupt. | ||
| They're bettors. | ||
| Not just bettors. | ||
| I mean these guys are not domain experts. | ||
| Like I said, I mean these guys are like masseuses commenting on brain scans. | ||
| I mean they have no idea which lesion is where. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I love you. | |
| So hold on. | ||
| First of all, tell us how people get access to you. | ||
| Ramaswami is like this 24-7. | ||
| They can reach me on Gab. | ||
| I haven't been that active, but I want to give a shout out to all my followers and all the people who send me nice comments. | ||
| I appreciate what you say, and that's why I'm on. | ||
| I speak on your behalf. | ||
| We love having brilliant people on. | ||
| OK, Monday, another explosive show. | ||
| Make sure we're going to get up the information about the rally with Mike Lindell tomorrow in South Carolina and the Bikers for Trump. | ||
| Have a great Mother's Day there. | ||
| By the way, have a great Mother's Day tomorrow and on Monday. | ||
| Lindell's going to be at the Corn Palace in Mitchell, South Dakota. | ||
| More information we'll be putting up. | ||
| Explosive show Monday morning. | ||
| The start of the Great Reckoning is happening and we're going to be the tip of the spear here starting on Monday to drive it even harder. | ||
| See you Monday. | ||
| Have a great Mother's Day. |
Export Selection