April 14, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:27
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | |
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | |
| Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| Bitcoin also hitting record highs. Some would argue the timing couldn't be more perfect for Coinbase to go public. | ||
| So that cryptocurrency trading company will make its public market debut later on today. | ||
| It's the first major crypto biz to do so in America. | ||
| It's not technically an IPO or initial public offering that has already sold shares to big investors at a price, but rather it's a direct listing where it will sell stock directly to public market investors. | ||
| By the way, the current reference price that has been set for this offering is $250 per share. | ||
| Keep it in mind, because if Coinbase were to open for trading at that level, it would be worth around $65 billion as a company. | ||
| That tool, financial sanctions, goes completely away in a digital yuan world. | ||
| So that's number one. | ||
| So that's a key element of the Chinese strategy. | ||
| But the other thing, Maria, and this is frightening, the whole Bitcoin, Empire, digital coinage, dollars, that's all predicated on this thing called blockchain technology, the idea that you can perfectly encrypt a system. | ||
| But the problem is that one of the things that China is doing right now is to try to dominate blockchain. | ||
| So you can guarantee you can take this to the digital bank right now. | ||
| China probably already knows how to crack, decrypt Bitcoin. | ||
| So it can be disruptive there. | ||
| So if it controls the digital universe there, and also has the ability to basically hack that system, it controls everything. | ||
| The analogy here for me, Marie, is that there's a famous Mahanian theory about how if you control the sea lines of communications back in the 1800s and 1900s, You control the world. | ||
| Well, in the 21st century, if you control the digital currency space, you control the world. | ||
| And that's where communist China is going right now. | ||
| That tool, financial sanctions, goes... | ||
| Okay. | ||
| By the way, we keep going. | ||
| There's a major hit today by Dr. Peter Navarro on Maria Bartiromo. | ||
| We've got a lot to do. | ||
| We're going to do the digital currency first, because this is going to directly impact your life. | ||
| Then we're going to talk about Dr. Fauci and the Wuhan lab and everything like that, because that's already directly influencing your life. | ||
| I want to get up in the live chat, if we can put. | ||
| I know we've got it on the site. | ||
| I think in the spring of 2018, the New York Times, Jeremy Peters, we sat down, did a long interview. | ||
| I was telling about Bitcoin being a disruptive technology and blockchain. | ||
| And essentially, you should go long Bitcoin, although the time is a little choppy. | ||
| So we've been kind of. | ||
| On this, for a couple years now, understanding the power of what this technology does as far as decentralization. | ||
| It also has many, many dangers to it, okay? | ||
| And around Bitcoin and other of these cryptocurrencies, it's been a lot of pirates, as you can imagine. | ||
| a new technology comes up. | ||
| I'm going to go to Peter Navarro in one second, but we're going to have Mike Lindell on here I think tomorrow, the next day, about his social media platform. | ||
| Everything launches on Monday, okay, but he's going to be on. | ||
| There's a way to sign up to be a VIP. | ||
| Go to the site now. | ||
| MyPillow.com is one of our sponsors. | ||
| Love the folks at MyPillow. | ||
| It's an American manufacturing company. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com today. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| Get in there, get the sheets, get the moccasins, get the slippers in over 120, I think, product categories. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com today. | ||
| Do that. | ||
| Support War Room. | ||
| Support Mike Lindell. | ||
| Support the MyPillow company. | ||
| I want to go now to Peter Navarro. | ||
| Peter, I've got to tell you, here's the question I've got to ask. | ||
| What is it about Maria Bartiromo, who I think is the best of all the hosts of any show, what is it about Maria Bartiromo that you come on there and it's all gravitas, and you're very calm, and you're very powerful, and you come on the war room and you're banging off the walls and you're, you know, you're getting us in hot water, you're getting yourself in hot water. | ||
| Is Maria, I mean, is the fact, I mean, I'm looking at that thing this morning and I go, who is this guy? | ||
| This guy is powerful. | ||
| He's got gravitas. | ||
| He's delivering the goods. | ||
| And your range is unbelievable, right? | ||
| From Fauci and vaccines and the details of Johnson & Johnson, White House decision-making, media strategy. | ||
| Then you have to go into Bitcoin, and then you finish, as a naval officer, you finish with the Mahanian, right, the Mahanian strategy that you got to get the choke points, the Royal Navy had that, that's the one in the world, but this is digital. | ||
| Your range is unbelievable, Dr. Navarro. | ||
| Let's stick with, let's stick with the digital currency. | ||
| Coinbase will list today, it's not really an IPO, it's kind of a listing, they're talking about the range, I guess it's 60 billion to 100 billion dollars out of the box. | ||
| I think all cryptocurrencies now If you added them up over two trillion, I believe Bitcoin itself has crossed the trillion, which I think they say is the quickest any company or entity, whether it's Microsoft or Apple or whatever, has ever gotten to a trillion dollars. | ||
| What are the benefits here, Dr. Navarro, and what are the risks? | ||
| Folks, you've got to understand something. | ||
| It's going to change your life. | ||
| Don't think you're going to get away from this now. | ||
| This is an actual thing. | ||
| When I talked about it in 18, people thought it was some sort of sideshow. | ||
| We kind of felt, no, this has got the potential technology to change a whole lot. | ||
| Dr. Navarro. | ||
| To your point, the difference between being on Bannon War Room and Maria Bartiromo, it's the crawl, Steve. | ||
| I mean, when I'm on the War Room here, you're trolling everybody in the audience with that CNN crawl. | ||
| I don't see a single stock symbol going across there. | ||
| It's nothing but troll time on Bannon, so what do you expect? | ||
| Maria Bartiromo, these are serious people. | ||
| Deploying serious sums of money and trying to figure out, on a serious note, just where we're going. | ||
| Because, look, we're in a world where the money we hold now, however much or however little we have now, is at extreme risk. | ||
| From a variety of risks. | ||
| The most obvious one at this point is the inflation risk from the strategy that Joe Biden is using to gain control of America through essentially buying off voters. | ||
| There's that. | ||
| There's the geopolitical risk of a China, Iran, and Russia emboldened by a Biden White House, which never read the chapter on the Ronald Reagan book about peace through strength. | ||
| An aside here, the latest defense budget has zero increase in it. | ||
| And it's all, instead of guns, it's a bunch of butter. | ||
| So there's that. | ||
| You got the pandemic risk. | ||
| But this digital currency, I think, I mean, as a macroeconomist, it boggles my mind to think through all of the various dangers. | ||
| One of them, for example, is if you take any standard economics course on macro and learn about monetary policy. | ||
| The base assumption there is you're working with fiat money and paper money and federal reserve and this, that, and the other thing, and the whole idea of stimulating or contracting the economy is controlling interest rates through control of the money supply, right? | ||
| You go to blockchain and digital, you not only have a totally different paradigm and you need a totally different textbook. | ||
| Communist China. | ||
| Take this to the digital bank, as I said on Maria this morning. | ||
| They already know how to go into Bitcoin right now and de-encrypt Bitcoin. | ||
| Now, if they can do that, they can screw around with the values of Bitcoin, so there should be more volatility in that than there is. | ||
| Hold it. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa. | |
| Hang on. | ||
| Hang on. | ||
| Because I know heads are blowing up. | ||
| Because I know a lot of the Bitcoin guys. | ||
| Well, heads should blow up. | ||
| Heads are going up. | ||
| I can remember Bitcoin when it was like $100. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$63,000 now. | |
| I mean, you would have been better invested in Bitcoin than Amazon, but it's dangerous, Steve. | ||
| Hang on for a second, slow down, because it is $63,000, but it won't be $63,000 Dr. Navarro saying, nah, they can get in there and reprogram it. | ||
| it is sixty three thousand dollars but it won't be sixty three thousand dollars doctor novara saying that they get in there written reprogram what facts doctor navarro you you who hammer poor doctor fauci every day on his lack of grass of evidence-based database sure science-based russian should give me the database the backs up doctor peter navarro saying that the chinese communist party can get into tip blockchain which every bitcoin says is absolutely physically impossible. | ||
| What say you sort of back up your claim that they can get in there? | ||
| Yeah, and Dr. Fauci said it's physically impossible. | ||
| Give me the unclassified version. | ||
| Admiral, I'll give you some homework to read tonight. | ||
| Unclassified version. | ||
| I'll give you, Admiral, I'll give you some homework to read tonight. | ||
| Go and read the China 2025 plan to take... | ||
| take over the world. The China 2025 plan was the plan which really mobilized the Trump administration to impose tariffs, particularly on high technology sectors. | ||
| In the China 2025 plan, what China does is identify like 10 different sectors of the economy that they want to be able to control. | ||
| And one of those 10 is blockchain technology. | ||
| And I always said, I've been saying this for five years, that of the sectors China wants to dominate, blockchain is the most important. | ||
| If you are able to figure out Blockchain, right? | ||
| You can, as a communist Chinese nation seeking to take over the world, you can go into any financial institution in the world and break down whatever they have in there, including passwords, accounts, whatever. | ||
| You can go in and you can disrupt any kind of digital currency system in a way that benefits you if you're trying to take that over. | ||
| I mean, it's the ultimate terrorist weapon and they spend a lot of time with their Thousand Talents program and other mathematicians and everything just working on, it's like today's Rubik's Cube, Steve, right? | ||
| And for anybody to say it's impossible to de-encrypt Bitcoin, that's true, until it's not. | ||
| It's a math problem. | ||
| I want to go back to what you said on Maria. | ||
| by the way, when Nigel Farage is sitting there warning against a pan-European war provoked by the West and the Biden administration and these crazies in the European Union, in the Ukraine of all places, where the United States ought to be, yeah, well, let's get involved in Ukraine. Let's get further involved in the Black Sea with the United States Navy. | ||
| That sounds like logical. At the same time, Dr. Mary Barber, today, the Chinese Communist Party is working 24 hours a day, 9 days a week, 400 days a year to get a crypto-backed yuan and put it on blockchain and disperse it throughout the world to begin to become the reserve currency. | ||
| And everybody, you look at the United Kingdom from 1914 to 1946, when the pound stopped being the reserve currency, things got very dark and gray in the United Kingdom. | ||
| Dr. Navarro, how big a threat is this to the people of the United States? | ||
| Well, first of all, let me tell you how the conversation goes when Xi Jinping calls Putin or the mullahs in Iran. | ||
| So, Xi Jinping will call Vladimir, and he'll say, hey, Vladimir, we need to distract The United States again from our bid to seize the entire world. | ||
| So do me a favor, go make some mischief in Ukraine, right? | ||
| That'll send off all of the Bidenites to kind of like take their eye off the China ball. | ||
| Oh, and then you call the Molas and it's like, go launch a few missiles. | ||
| In the Middle East and cause a little little havoc in Iraq and that'll cause them to, you know, John Kerry will go over there and kind of give them a bunch of money to calm them down. | ||
| We always like the history. | ||
| It's like what 2021 now, right? | ||
| The history since 9-11 when we were going to make that pivot to Asia and China has been to Forget about China. | ||
| Trump did not, but everybody else has. | ||
| Now, this dangerously, I'm telling you, the Mahanian analogy... Hang on, we're going to come back. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break, pay some bills. | ||
| The Mahanian analogy, direct from the Naval War College via Harvard University. | ||
| Dr. Peter Navarro with Natalie Winters, Raheem Kassam, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to return in just a moment. | |
| War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| It's a little bit to sort of understand the risk calculation here, right? | ||
| So, you know, there's this phrase, abundance of caution, which has become a kind of cliche. | ||
| It was, it was used today, right? | ||
| Out of an abundance of caution. | ||
| And every time I hear that phrase, I think, well, I don't want an abundance of caution. | ||
| I want the correct amount of caution, right? | ||
| I mean, we're, we're fighting a deadly pandemic, so it, it, it doesn't, you know, it matters how many shots get into arms. | ||
| You and I, I think agree on that, right? | ||
| It matters whether people have the knock-on effect of reading this news and thinking, oh my word, you know, I don't know about these vaccines. | ||
| So there's, there is stuff on the other side of the ledger here you would, I think, agree. | ||
| Yeah, there is. | ||
| But this is not a rare event when you're following the potential for adverse events with a new product such as this vaccine, where you pause, take a quick look and then say, OK, this is probably nothing. | ||
| It probably isn't any more than you'd expect anyway. | ||
| Let's move on. | ||
| That happens more frequently than you could imagine, Chris, because of the attention on this. | ||
| For reasons that are very obvious, we're in the middle of a deadly pandemic. | ||
| It becomes something that people pay a lot of attention to. | ||
| But it's not at all unusual to have pauses when you're dealing with vaccinations. | ||
| It's a little bit to sort of understand the... Yeah, but you have those when you're doing a clinical trial, dude. | ||
| You do that in a clinical trial. | ||
| Chris Hayes, the interview is actually fascinating, and Chris Hayes, who, like I said, is no fan of the show, no fan of me personally, no fan, particularly no fan of Trump, he's Rachel Maddow's mini-me, but a smart guy. | ||
| You could tell him that entire time. | ||
| He was worried. | ||
| What we were worried about yesterday, the thing with the guy, the coordinator steps up and says, oh yeah, no, we didn't really know about it. | ||
| They notified us. | ||
| They notified us, Johnson & Johnson notified us, we were going to make, they were going to make an announcement. | ||
| And they said, well, did you know the announcement? | ||
| No, we didn't get any details. | ||
| Didn't ask. | ||
| Corporate America, the big pharma, just going to announce. | ||
| Now we know from the New York Times, they never notified Joe Biden when they found out at 10 o'clock, they were going to make an announcement. | ||
| So Hayes kind of worked through that, but that, The sun is setting, it's beginning to set on Dr. St. | ||
| Tony Fauci. | ||
| Okay, you can see it. | ||
| You can see the media right now. | ||
| They're getting very nervous because they own him now. | ||
| They own him. | ||
| They promoted him for the anti-Trump thing. | ||
| On his watch, we said this from day one, once they got to own it, they're going to see how it's broken And they're going to distance themselves. | ||
| Raheem, you're hearing this from your contacts, your extensive social contacts at the Morton's Clubhouse? | ||
| There are benefits to being a Landry Select Club President's Club member. | ||
| They let you put microphones everywhere. | ||
| No, the chatter on Capitol Hill, it's not, it doesn't just go to the heart of the BS from Fauci. | ||
| It's actually very widespread now. | ||
| People, I mean, openly establishment, neoliberal, globalist-minded news reporters, in inverted commas, that have taken the line of the left for so very long. | ||
| A kind of in closed rebellion behind the scenes at the moment. | ||
| They doubt things, predominantly doubt things that are coming out of Fauci's mouth and are disinclined to quote him, let alone take his side editorially on any of the issues he talks about. | ||
| It also is very, very significant what I'm hearing about Biden and the Biden regime and the people around Biden, the access that the press are being given. | ||
| They now feel like they're being hidden things from us. | ||
| We know they have been. | ||
| And it also goes to this Matt Gaetz story as well. | ||
| I'm getting text after text, phone calls after phone calls, direct messages over direct messages. | ||
| Of reporters that work for major DC corporate establishment papers going, yeah, this is really all a bunch of BS. | ||
| And so it's across the board you're seeing this now. | ||
| Veritas puts it lightly. | ||
| But let's wait until that closed rebellion turns into open rebellion. | ||
| Because at some point soon, somebody's going to come out there and say, you can't make us report this stuff anymore. | ||
| But this is why I want to go to Dr. Peter Navarro. | ||
| I want to give a shout out to Kelly Sadler and the team over at the Washington Times, the great Washington Times. | ||
| She's, I think, the editorial page editor now. | ||
| She's had the courage to print Dr. Peter Navarro's essential takedown of Fauci. | ||
| And this is why I want to get your input, Rahim, because, Peter, I think now, because the sun's starting to set, you can see Chris Hayes has passed Pete Fauci, right? | ||
| He was not happy with that interview last night. | ||
| Because, you know, he didn't, because of the narrative, he didn't want to go in there, but he could have blown Fauci out of the water. | ||
| It was just more double-talk, more spin, more nonsense, right? | ||
| And his basic question was, hey, I understand the science, you've got FDA and everything, but you have to have, this is decisions, and decisions have to have executives that kind of balance and weigh. | ||
| There's another part of the ledger. | ||
| Right? | ||
| There's the assets and the liabilities. | ||
| He was trying to be as polite as possible. | ||
| You could see in his face he was not happy with the spin there. | ||
| Now, but the second part of this is now going to be the accountability of Tony Fauci. | ||
| Your piece, I think, is the first time it actually gets in print from a guy who was there, that would be you, to say, hey, hey, hey, hey. | ||
| This virus is Tony Fauci's. | ||
| He financed it, right? | ||
| This is the Wuhan lab and the Chinese Communist Party, they have a partner in Tony Fauci. | ||
| And it's a shout out, we're going to put it up on the page here, if Denver can put it up, and in the live stream. | ||
| Dr. Navarro, walk us through your brutal piece on Dr. Tony Fauci. | ||
| Brutally honest, Steve. | ||
| Let's start, for the radio audience, I'm turning to the house that Fauci built. | ||
| In my background here, this is the Wuhan Virology Lab. | ||
| It is a P4 weapons lab. | ||
| P4 means it's the highest security. | ||
| This is a laboratory Where I document carefully in the Washington Times op-ed that, first of all, Tony Fauci gave U.S. | ||
| taxpayer money through the NIH, the National Institutes of Health, to the Wuhan lab, and he funneled it through this shadowy figure named Peter Daszak, okay? | ||
| So, fact one, Fauci used American taxpayer money to fund the lab. | ||
| Fact two, Peter Daszak, who got the money, was shown on a beautiful clip that Tucker Carlson actually put out, bragging about how gain of function Research was used in this lab, basically, to create more dangerous types of viruses. | ||
| So that's fact two. | ||
| Fact three is the gain of function, the genetic engineering of viruses, which is designed to make them more dangerous, i.e. | ||
| to weaponize them. | ||
| That was approved in 2017, December. | ||
| by Tony Fauci and Francis Collins, who's the head of NIH. | ||
| And Steve, what bothers me the most about that is that Fauci screwed both Obama and Trump with one decision, okay? | ||
| because in 2014 the Obama administration, after some leaks from some of these high security labs of dangerous pathogens said, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Gain of function research is too frigging dangerous. | ||
| Stop that. | ||
| And as soon as Obama was out the door, Fauci and Collins come in and issue an edict that says back on at the Wuhan lab. | ||
| And he did not come to the Oval Office and say, hey boss, we're doing this. | ||
| It might be a little dangerous, but we're letting the Chinese go out and genetically engineer bat viruses using this tool. | ||
| So the only remaining question, Steve, as to whether Tony Fauci is the father of the CCP virus, aka COVID-19. | ||
| COVID-19 aka SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| The only remaining question is whether that virus escaped from this lab. | ||
| Now, a guy named Navarro said, yeah, in March of 2020, probably escaped from the lab. | ||
| Tom Cotton, same time frame, said it. | ||
| Now a year later, We have at least two other people saying this. | ||
| The head of the CDC, Robert Redfield, now that he's gone, he can speak freely, he says, yeah, not only probably came from this lab, but they were working on it, which implies they were genetically engineering. | ||
| And now Sanjay Gupta, in an homage to Navarro, talked about Occam's razor, the simplest explanation is the most likely. | ||
| If you have a virus, That's weaponized a kilometer from this little building here, right? | ||
| It's probably from this little building. | ||
| So this is the house that Fauci built. | ||
| He funded it. | ||
| He approved the gain-of-function research. | ||
| The virus 99.9% escaped from the lab. | ||
| These interviewers now, next time Fauci comes on, Somebody in CNN or MSNBC... No, it's gonna happen. | ||
| That's what I'm saying. | ||
| The sun is setting on Fauci and they're gonna do it. | ||
| You watch another prediction like Bitcoin. | ||
| Okay, I want to go back to something. | ||
| We've got a couple minutes left. | ||
| There's so many bombshells you dropped on Maria Bartiromo. | ||
| We're gonna get the whole interview up there. | ||
| But for our audience, because of their livelihood, their kids, their decisions today, you brought up the TORT word. | ||
| You brought the T word up when talked about why it's important to lock down what they did in that lab on the Chinese people, on the nation of China, and particularly on people in the West, the United States of West. | ||
| You used the word TORT. | ||
| What did you mean and why is that important, sir? | ||
| One of my deep regrets at the Trump White House was not being able to push forward with a presidential commission. | ||
| The boss wanted to do it. | ||
| But again, it was one of these cases where Mnuchin, Steve Mnuchin, wanted to kiss up to the Chinese. | ||
| And he fought this tooth and nail. | ||
| That commission would not only have gotten to the bottom of the origins of the virus, it would have put in motion a calculation of the trillions of dollars that China has cost us with this virus and allowed us to collect both compensatory damages and punitive damages. | ||
| That's the language of tort law. | ||
| A tort is when you sue somebody who's harmed you and you collect compensatory damage For the harm they inflicted on you, as well as possibly punitive damages to discourage them from doing that again. | ||
| That's exactly what we need to do with Communist China, because they took away, at a minimum, a full year's worth of GDP when you cost it all out. | ||
| I'm talking over $20 trillion in cost, Steve. | ||
| That's the ultimate international tort. | ||
| We gotta bounce. | ||
| We're gonna get all your contact information up in the next session. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mahan is my tribute to you today, sir. | |
| Thank you, sir. | ||
| Be back with Natalie Winters in a moment. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, support the War Room, support Lindell, support MyPillow. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com right now. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| Take action. | ||
| Use your agency. | ||
| Do it today. | ||
| Do it now. | ||
| Once you get inside there, you make your own decisions, but take the action today. | ||
| Okay, MyPillow.com. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| You'll like what you see and you will love what you buy. | ||
| It's pretty good. | ||
| Pretty good, these jingles. | ||
| Got that great one for the thing. | ||
| Work on oneself begins with oneself. | ||
| I'm trademarking that. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| There's so much to go through, so much happening. | ||
| We're winning. | ||
| I'm getting tired of winning, actually. | ||
| I'm getting tired of winning now. | ||
| I know people are sitting there, hairs pulling out. | ||
| No, come on. | ||
| Stick with the program. | ||
| Rahim, one of the most important things, I think, is the growth. | ||
| And one of the things we try to do here is help particularly young institutions grow, having their people on. | ||
| A lot of the times what you don't see is the work we do with these folks. | ||
| It's all about a new generation. | ||
| I think it was it was a Brian Kennedy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| No, no. | ||
| It was Chris Buskirk. | ||
| We are going to win elections. | ||
| We're going to win in 2020. | ||
| It's going to take another 10-15 years and that you know the boomers won't be around here for a lot of it But we'll pass the baton on I'm a huge believer in that we are going to win elections We're going to win in 2020 2022 is going to be a tea party type election if we get our act together But it's really supporting these young people One of the things I'm most impressed with is that when people talk to me, come to me, I say, look, look at James O'Keefe. | ||
| He started with a bang with Acorn, got all the publicity. | ||
| Then they went through some tough times and he had a couple of things that didn't work out, but he grinded, grinded, grinded. | ||
| And he's obsessed, obsessed. | ||
| He's a little bit like Andrew Breitbart, right? | ||
| These guys I kind of call these idiot savants that are so genius and understand something that people don't understand. | ||
| people laugh and mock him, but they know Breitbart was, Andrew was such a genius about news and about information and how people would come to that information, right? | ||
| Absolute genius that I think a lot of people didn't appreciate, particularly the mainstream media, but absolute genius. | ||
| James O'Keefe has been obsessed with investigative reporting. | ||
| And what has happened in both the Facebook situation and in the CNN situation? | ||
| These are two major hits, because now you're seeing how they think inside at an executive level. | ||
| The Facebook thing, and we still haven't taken enough time to go through that. | ||
| To me, the most profound of all stuff about Facebook, that thing was at the end when the guy says, yeah, everybody knows that really transhumanism is where he spends his time and money. | ||
| You know, he wants to live forever. | ||
| He and the wife, right? | ||
| It's all about living forever. | ||
| Boom! | ||
| That was like the fifth bombshell of ever. | ||
| This CNN hit is so profound. | ||
| And we don't have time to play it, maybe the next couple of days, where O'Keefe goes into the restaurant and confronts the guy, and the guy starts, you're in my personal space, right? | ||
| But what has come out for this? | ||
| And I think whether it's the Gates story, whether it's the Fauci story, whether it's all of it, you see the phoniness of what they're doing. | ||
| It's all starting to kind of crack around them. | ||
| I don't want to oversell it. | ||
| I think Boris a little bit oversells it that hey we're thing and you know but that's Boris being Boris and which we love but we are you starting to see the cracks in the foundation here Mr. Rahim Ghassan. | ||
| You are you're starting to see a lot of panic actually set in here so let's let's let's rewind to Yesterday evening, when I walk in here, we're about, what, 10 minutes away, 20 minutes away from live, and this Veritas video drops. | ||
| And it's, what's his name, Chester, whatever, Charles Chester, technical director at CNN, bragging on camera. | ||
| Now, where was this camera? | ||
| This camera was attached to a young lady who was an undercover reporter for Project Veritas that managed to meet this chap via Tinder. | ||
| via Tinder. | ||
| But he was targeted, obviously. | ||
| So he's on a hook-up app, right? | ||
| Just keep that in the back of your mind. | ||
| He's on a hook-up app, meeting some young girl, or lady, and he gets into bragging about his network's lack of journalistic ethics. | ||
| As guys are wont to do. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And specifically talks about how the stories about Congressman Gates are, his words, quote, propaganda, and quote, his words, helpful to the Democratic Party. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| But the overall arching thing is not just the Gates, it's kind of a subset, the overarching thing is that we took down Trump. | ||
| Our number one focus, our number one priority is taking down Donald Trump. | ||
| But I'm going to show you the panic here, right? | ||
| So immediately after that story drops, the Gates team gets a request for comment from Paula Reid, CNN's legal correspondent. | ||
| And the request is, hey, we're going to run a story that says this, this, this, and this, right? | ||
| Okay, fine, whatever. | ||
| So, I've just been sent this article that dropped from Paula Reid this morning. | ||
| And interestingly, in the article, she says that a Gates spokesman did not respond to request for comment. | ||
| Unfortunately for her, I have the email from Gates spokesman directly to Paula Reid An hour and a half before her deadline was due. | ||
| So is that a lie? | ||
| It's an outright lie. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And it's a provable lie. | ||
| Why did they lie like that? | ||
| Because they don't want to include the statement. | ||
| No, no, but how did they think you're going to get away with it if you got an email? | ||
| Because people don't call this stuff out. | ||
| You know, there has been this long-standing approach. | ||
| Is Gates' team going to do that? | ||
| Well, we will actually be publishing the entire back and forth up on the National Pulse. | ||
| National Pulse, okay. | ||
| And here's why they didn't want to publish the statement. | ||
| Because immediately after that Project Veritas clip comes out, CNN, remember, wants to pile in, cover up, full panic mode. | ||
| The New York Times, The Washington Post, they all pile in, by the way. | ||
| Which is funny, because I didn't think they were the same network, but apparently they are. | ||
| This is what the Gates spokesman quote said. | ||
| It said, hidden camera footage released today exposed CNN for using fake news stories about Rip Gates to push self-described propaganda because Congressman Gates is an effective threat to the Democratic Party's dangerous agenda. | ||
| And that was a quote from there. | ||
| These are the words of your own employee. | ||
| CNN viewers should find the explosive footage and come to their own conclusions about how credible CNN and its anonymous sources are. | ||
| Have they addressed anything on the guy's statement? | ||
| CNN has not come forward at all and said anything? | ||
| No. | ||
| So this is the full panic? | ||
| In observable detail right now? | ||
| This is also the power of what you've done over the National Pulse with the investigative reporting and actually be open to things like this where you can put it out there and say, hey, respond to this. | ||
| This is an email exchange. | ||
| Look, Paula Reid wanted a comment from Gates' spokesman. | ||
| I now want a comment from Paula Reid. | ||
| So I reached out to her. | ||
| And if she sends me a comment unlike her, I will include it. | ||
| Yes, because you're a real journalist. | ||
| Right? | ||
| So let's see if she bothers to respond to this. | ||
| I want to talk about panic, and that's going to be panic in the Jeffrey Sachs camp today. | ||
| Natalie, go through. | ||
| Let's get this article up. | ||
| The one and only Natalie Winters, which I'm so proud of. | ||
| Having known her when she was a teenager, which is a couple weeks ago now, as just an amazing woman, still an undergraduate at the University of Chicago. | ||
| And I use it as a prototype because I tell people when they come here, just get to work and grind and do the hard work. | ||
| Get into the documents. | ||
| If you do that, everything will take place, right? | ||
| And Natalie, you've done a great job. | ||
| Talk to us about Jeffrey Sachs and what your investigative reporting shows. | ||
| Sure, well thank you. | ||
| So Jeffrey Sachs is the chairman of the Lancet Medical Journal's COVID-19 Commission, and this is a pretty high-profile body when you're talking about really the entire world's response to COVID-19. | ||
| They've been advising the UN, and they've really come out at the forefront really discrediting the lab leak theory saying that the Chinese Communist Party had no role in the spread and the genesis of COVID-19. But like many of these people who are kind of running cover for the Chinese government and mainstream media outlets in these bodies like the World Health Organization, Sachs has a lot of ties to the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| I think there's so many, but I'll do it in order of magnitude. So to start, he was actually an advisor to CEFC China Energy and he spoke at several of their conferences and People might remember that firm because it appears on the Hunter Biden hard drive several times. | ||
| Actually, the chairman of the organization was indicted by the DOJ, I believe in 2017, for trying to bribe officials from other countries to really give the Chinese Communist Party... It was the Biden family's main cash source. | ||
| Yes, $10 million annually for, quote, introductions alone. | ||
| Maybe Jeffrey Sachs was one of those. | ||
| But the list really does continue. | ||
| He also wrote a position paper for Huawei, which obviously has a backdoor access for the Chinese Communist Party for all of the data, the 5G networks that that company runs. | ||
| And interestingly enough, he praised Huawei. | ||
| I believe the direct quote was, let me get it, it's absolutely amazing. | ||
| He's praising Huawei. | ||
| Praising Huawei is the second page of the position paper that they have launching their new network initiatives. | ||
| He says, by any standard Huawei is a remarkable company and by any standard Huawei's vision of our shared digital future is powerful, exciting and uniquely well informed. | ||
| Read the article. | ||
| There's more quotes I could probably read for the rest of the show. | ||
| All the horrible, horrible things that he's written about these Chinese Communist Party linked companies. | ||
| But he also goes on Chinese state run media outlets a ton. | ||
| He's written op eds entitled America's Unholy Crusade Against China. | ||
| Another one titled Why the U.S. | ||
| Should Pursue Cooperation with China. | ||
| But really, to me, the big zinger in all this is that in in 2020, it was in March. | ||
| He went on a podcast that is run, organized, launched by an organization called the China United States Exchange Foundation. | ||
| And we've done a lot of reporting on this group because it's part of the Chinese government's United Front effort, which, according to the U.S. | ||
| government, seeks to really, quote, co-opt and neutralize Really the top rungs of American society, the academic elite, the political elite. | ||
| So people like Jeffrey Sachs would definitely be of interest to this organization, especially given his role on the Lancet Journal's COVID-19 Commission. | ||
| And the host, who is an employee of QSAC, also happens to be an ambassador of goodwill for the World Health Organization alongside Xi Jinping's wife, but that's neither here nor there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Believe it or not, there's no conspiracies, but there's also no coincidences, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| But this QSAC host says to Jeffrey Sachs, quote, we've come to feel safe in your hands and in your ambitions. | ||
| And that's just after Jeffrey Sachs says, and I'll read the full quote. | ||
| The U.S., this is Jeffrey Sachs, the U.S. | ||
| right wing was attacking China beforehand in regards to COVID and the Trump administration had its so-called trade war against China and then its technology war against China. | ||
| I regarded those as dangerous, wrong, absurd, on false pretenses, but it showed China's successes of recent years had triggered a response by the American right wing, the hardline nationalists to say, we have to confront China. | ||
| And Trump was in the middle of confronting China. | ||
| And I think very dangerously so. | ||
| And I opposed it all along. | ||
| So this is an individual. | ||
| Can we take a bow here in the war room? | ||
| The hardline nationalist? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Against a murderous dictatorship. | ||
| And he's right out there. | ||
| He's open about it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And again, to kind of reset, this is the broader thing that we've been exposing at the national polls, which is all of these so-called experts that whether it's Western media outlets like CNN hyping actually Jeffrey Sachs, I believe is a contributor of some sort to CNN. | ||
| He writes a lot of op-eds, including those debunking the Wuhan uh... lab theory but all of these people really all roads do lead back to the chinese communist party we had another story about a week ago an individual who was debunking the wuhan lab leak theory by the name of in lipkin quoted and u s a today all you heard about him was that he's a you know world-renowned virologist researcher will turns out he's also been honored two times by the chinese government one of those awards is also from the chinese military this is a guy who describes himself | ||
| as a quote consultant for the chinese communist party obviously you have at the infamous peter doshak right that was the only person that they could get on that now infamous sixty minutes interview to defend that should the chinese communist party against the lab leak theory because no other scientists well and frankly all that do have ties to the chinese communist party national polls | ||
| And under Rahim Kassam's tutelage, Natalie Winters, then a college student at the University of Chicago, has done more to expose Peter Daszak and exactly what went on in Wuhan than all the investigative apparatus combined, right? | ||
| And now she's in the Jeffrey Sachs business. | ||
| As the engine room of the War Room reminds me, as we're bringing this segment to a close, Alexander Preet and the great team over there, she reminds me who is also the financial advisor to Pope Francis. | ||
| It would be, we're not making this up, we'll show the article tomorrow, Jeffrey Sachs, right? | ||
| This is a man, a lot of dots get connected through Jeffrey Sachs in the Earth Institute of Columbia University. | ||
| And I think the real tell on all of this is that Peter Doshak, Fauci, the Jeffrey Sachs types of the world, they were the people who were defending gain-of-function research, defending the collaboration with institutes like the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| And if there's anything that we've learned from this is, one, that collaboration with them means absolutely nothing, because what have we got from the Wuhan Institute of Virology? | ||
| Okay, Natalie Woerner, she's going to join us after the break. | ||
| We've got Sean Parnell up in Pennsylvania. | ||
| the fact that they would rather prevent selling out the Chinese Communist Party than revealing that they failed in their quest to kind of stop these pandemics from spreading. Okay Natalie Winner she's going to join us after the break we got Sean Parnell up in Pennsylvania. Afghanistan next. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic with Stephen K Bannon The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | |
| War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, Sean Parnell is up in a factory up in western Pennsylvania. | ||
| We're trying to track him down because of Lindsey Graham came out last night, can't get out of Afghanistan, 20 years, you know, this is the big fight we had with... President Trump wanted to do it with the national security apparatus he had around him. | ||
| They don't ever want to leave, okay? | ||
| Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, we are the leaders in taking down the CCP. | ||
| No, we do not need to be bleeding out in Afghanistan anymore to take down the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Focus and never say, oh, that's they're going to control the great game, everything like that. | ||
| Let let the Chinese learn what the Americans and the Russians and the British learned about Afghanistan. | ||
| OK, we don't need to be spread all over. | ||
| Hell's half-acre. | ||
| It's time to focus, focus, focus. | ||
| Okay, we must focus on taking down the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| I also want to make sure the T-word, when Natalie Winters starts talking about her writing and all the research she's doing and stuff like that, the T-word, the tort word, okay, there are going to be massive court cases. | ||
| I just want a couple, the DNI, Right? | ||
| Under Biden. | ||
| Now, this thing was started under Trump. | ||
| The report was started under Trump with many of the people that Trump put in place. | ||
| But DNI put a report the other day that talked about the economic carnage, the societal carnage that has been done by the CCP virus coming through the Wuhan lab. | ||
| And they really didn't even include a drill down on China or the Chinese people, which to me is a first order of magnitude. | ||
| Effort that you have to do. | ||
| They said it's going to be 10, 15, 20 years before the world recovers from this. | ||
| The Congressional Budget Office, because we're data-based, evidence-based, and science-based here in the War Room, the Congressional Budget Office put out a report in June of 2020 that said the U.S. | ||
| economy aggregate demand would be hit with at least 15 trillion dollars of a downturn because of the CCP virus, and that was in the very early stages. | ||
| My point, the carnage that this has caused from Wuhan to Hubei province, to central China, spread throughout the entire world, the deaths, the destruction, the societal, the PTSD people have had, certain people, they're talking in the New York Times the other thing about everybody's being so afraid of re-entering the workspace now, right? | ||
| The way this has been handled, the way we're at each other's throats, Right? | ||
| On this debate whether, hey, this is a total hoax and I don't want to wear a mask, I want to be open tomorrow versus, hey, it is the worst thing in human history and we've got to go to a bomb shelter and you need nine masks and you ought to be taking a vaccine every other week. | ||
| That spread, OK? | ||
| All caused, all caused by human agency. | ||
| It's now we know that this did not come from a bat cave. | ||
| It did not come through an animal that took a trip A trip from the Laos border, a thousand miles inland in interior China. | ||
| If you've never been there, hey, it's not getting on an interstate and just driving up someplace like that, like going from New York City to Kansas City, right through some of the toughest terrain in the world on no trail at all of any farmer of any village of any town having the virus and not one animal. | ||
| No, it was a pangolin. | ||
| Nothing right to end up. | ||
| Hey, just randomly. | ||
| With a thousand fresh markets between there and Wuhan just to end up in a Wuhan fresh market that happened to be down the street from a P4 lab that's in the business of doing this. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| And Sanjay Gupta still yesterday caveats about saying, you know, I am saying that it came probably in all likelihood because Ockham Raiders did come from land, but it's not man-made. | ||
| No, sir. | ||
| When Fauci says they're working on, they're working on these viruses, they're not just sitting there observing them. | ||
| Oh, look at that. | ||
| Isn't that interesting that they got the SARS-1, right? | ||
| They're working on it. | ||
| It's called Gain of Function. | ||
| And Betsy McCord, we didn't have a full connection with her yesterday, but she throws down, hey Steve, I understand you guys do nomenclature in the war room, but stop calling it Gain of Function. | ||
| It's weaponization of viruses for a biological weapons program. | ||
| Right? | ||
| We had another expert on the other day said everybody knows they got a biological weapons program. | ||
| That's the current weapons of mass destruction is cyber, right? | ||
| Cyber and combined with biology. | ||
| It's Dr. Doudna, the winner of the Nobel, the awardee of the Nobel Prize in 2020 and the woman that has led the way in gene editing, right? | ||
| In gene splicing. | ||
| Understand with the M size or she's the one that kind of for her and her team and her mentors found this and focus on when other people said now that's kind of the backboard turns out it wasn't She's the one that's very concerned about this entire gene editing and what these vaccines have become, right? | ||
| You've got to go back to the railhead, and that's why Fauci and places like him, I thought of a random name that has not gotten enough, but I'm going to turn it over to Natalie Winters, because I know. | ||
| Dr. Barak in the University of North Carolina. | ||
| Dr. Barak, he was all out bragging in the spring, the universe, Chapel Hill, get ready. | ||
| What is your responsibility for this? | ||
| What are American institutions, supported by American taxpayers, supported by the hard work of the deplorables, that are too good now for the deplorables, right? | ||
| All woke. | ||
| Y'all woke down at North Carolina Chapel Hill, but guess what? | ||
| Where are your hands and back of the plague year? | ||
| I notice Barrick not giving a lot of interviews anymore, not getting out there trying to get his profile out. | ||
| What is Barrick's responsibility for this? | ||
| What is Dr. Fauci's responsibility for this? | ||
| Once again, oh, Bannon's hair's on fire, he's such a bad guy, he's so evil. | ||
| We told you from January 23rd that Fauci was dangerous and Fauci was a bad guy. | ||
| Because he gets on radio the very first time on that weekend, he gets on the John Katz Matisse show and says, hey, there's nothing to worry about. | ||
| It's not going to affect America, it's not coming to America, there's nothing to worry about. | ||
| Au contraire, sir, now you come to America, it came to the entire world, and first, because you are a running dog for the Chinese Communist Party, first it came to the hard-working, decent people in Wuhan, in Hubei province, that bore the brunt of this, and in silence we don't know what happened there. | ||
| It's all going to come out. | ||
| It's all, all, all going to come out. | ||
| And you see last night, Chris Hayes, in that troubled, worried look, when he's sitting there with Fauci and he's going, oh my God, I got some basic questions these guys got to answer the fact of why the National Security Council just said, oh, it's not our responsibility. | ||
| The science, the science, the science is like a cult mantra. | ||
| The science, the science, the science, that is scientism. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Today at five o'clock, we're going to drill down on all this. | |
| The vaccine passports. | ||
| Naomi Wolf is going to join us. | ||
| Very controversial, but has really thought this thing through. | ||
| And what she has to say and the dots she connects is quite shocking. | ||
| Remember, there's no conspiracies, but there are also no coincidences. | ||
| See you back here at five. | ||
| We have a podcast today, Raheem? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will have a podcast today, yes. | |
| Natalie, I want to thank you for joining us. | ||
| Amazing, amazing work. | ||
| Amazing work. | ||
| Can't say enough about it. | ||
| And the young people out there that are driving this movement forward. | ||
| Remember, out there in this audience, particularly you boomers, there's a generation coming up, rising up today that will not be defeated. |
Export Selection