Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
This is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
Because if you don't, then the worst happens. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, welcome back in unoccupied Washington, D.C. | ||
on day, what is it, Raheem, 68 of the occupation. | ||
We've got breaking news about that. | ||
Day 55 without press conference. | ||
unidentified
|
55. | |
By the way, Nancy Pelosi, did we call it here on the show or not? | ||
There's not going to be any joint session. | ||
She said the other day, oh, he said enough, we've got to go out now and talk to the American people. | ||
I told you, you can't stand up there for 40 minutes and do a State of the Union or the joint session, which is the first one. | ||
Okay, we've got so much to go through, I want to go back to By the way, just right behind you, CNN had a graphic of all of the countries that are stopping using the AstraZeneca vaccine now as well across Europe. | ||
I think there were 15 countries up there on the screen. | ||
I mean, this is getting wilder and wilder. | ||
Madeleine Peltz, you're better at Media Matters. | ||
Why don't you take a look at the headline of the Financial Times of London today, right? | ||
Yes. | ||
Do you think, honestly though, do you think the Media Matters guys watch this? | ||
And then, you know, we're proved right sometimes immediately, sometimes a month later, sometimes a year later. | ||
Do you ever think they struggle with, like, internalizing that? | ||
I mean, I don't know how you would deal with that. | ||
When you're confronted with just how, like, you are wrong for a living over and over again, like, how does that feel? | ||
She's fantastic. | ||
I think she's fantastic. | ||
She's the marketing department for the show. | ||
I know, I just feel sorry for her. | ||
We get more stretched. | ||
I don't feel sorry for her. | ||
She's a professional. | ||
unidentified
|
She makes a lot of bad calls. | |
I think we can turn the whole crew over there. | ||
They're smart people. | ||
They're going to see the error of their ways and back the populist nationalist movement. | ||
There's no doubt about that. | ||
I would love to have her in studio one day. | ||
MyPillow.com, our sponsor, Michael and Dale, all the great team over there. | ||
Go to Promo Code War Room today. | ||
Just go online, check it out. | ||
They get up to 66% discount with the War Room promo code. | ||
You saw Raheem got the slippers. | ||
Mike broke the slippers about, you know, announcing the slippers the other day and the moccasins. | ||
Raheem's got them. | ||
Raheem actually got them for the most important person in his life. | ||
unidentified
|
You. | |
No, no, no. | ||
I know that's not true. | ||
Although they look kind of cool. | ||
You look nice. | ||
So they got so much of the Giza sheets, they got the pillows, they got all of it. | ||
See, I had to get one of our sponsors, I had to get a promo in because John Fredericks, on his thing, he's taking our show and putting his promos in. | ||
I like that. | ||
It's fun stuff. | ||
I want to also announce... | ||
John Fredericks, the team at Real America's Voice. | ||
Now John Fredericks is going to have a show that starts tomorrow, I think, at 4 o'clock. | ||
It's going to be the lead into the War Room, into the afternoon show. | ||
And of course, for the John Fredericks Radio Network, the power block that starts at 3 o'clock. | ||
Doug Collins at 3, John Fredericks now back up at 4, and of course the War Room at 5. | ||
That's 3 to 6. | ||
Wow! | ||
That's pure, that's heat. | ||
That's heat coming in there. | ||
Red hot. | ||
So John, I want to ask, I want to go back about Georgia, about what's going on. | ||
I wake up this morning and Coca-Cola and Home Depot and a lot of these big Atlanta, you know, massive corporations are coming out fully woke, right? | ||
Just to let the deplorables know how much they appreciate them, right? | ||
On voter fraud and voter integrity. | ||
What's going on with the bill and what's going on with the woke companies down in hot Atlanta? | ||
Well, it started with the Chamber of Commerce and then it went from there and now you've got Home Depot. | ||
You've got the usual suspects coming in saying, oh my goodness, this is voter restriction, we can't do this because we've got threats from Black Lives Matter, Stacey Abrams, we're all going to get sued. | ||
Look, it's all nonsense, okay? | ||
This is what they do. | ||
This is why Stacey Abrams is such a formidable opponent. | ||
She came on, did eight talk shows on Sunday. | ||
She's a force of nature. | ||
She is formidable. | ||
Yeah, she is formidable. | ||
She's damn formidable, yes. | ||
These voter integrity laws in Georgia, are Jim Crow in a suit? | ||
No. | ||
First of all, they're not voter restriction laws. | ||
Secondly, they're voter integrity laws in order to be sure that your vote counts. | ||
Now, there's two bills. | ||
HB, this is a House bill, HB 531, and Senate Bill 241. | ||
Both of these together now are going to go into reconciliation. | ||
The naysayers are saying, oh, these bills don't do enough. | ||
When it gets out of reconciliation, you're going to get the best of both bills plus better amendments. | ||
You're going to have sweeping national blueprint legislation on how to fix voter integrity in the country. | ||
As we said from the beginning, Georgia is going to show the way. | ||
Are these bills, are they perfect? | ||
No. | ||
But Steve and Rahim, let's not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. | ||
There's also political reality. | ||
A lot of people saying, well, it doesn't address the machines. | ||
Well, Burt Jones, state senator, put in a bill to get rid of the machines and go to paper ballots. | ||
He spent $110 million on Georgia. | ||
He put that in his committee. | ||
He got a backing from one Democrat, Elena Parent. | ||
In Buckhead, she backed him when it was bipartisan. | ||
It couldn't get out of committee. | ||
This is the political reality, so we're going to have to deal with that. | ||
But these are two outstanding bills. | ||
They're going to come together, get into reconciliation. | ||
There's going to be amendments. | ||
I think the finished product is going to be better and stronger than the two bills singularly, and it's going to go from there. | ||
The governor, Brian Kemp, has three choices. | ||
Veto, not going to happen, or sit on it. | ||
Well, there's no pocket veto in Georgia. | ||
He sits on it 60 days, it becomes law, or he can sign it. | ||
Either way, he's not going to veto it. | ||
These are going to become law, and it's going to change everything, because you're going to have honest voting in Georgia, where in 2020, you simply didn't have that, Steve. | ||
John, real quickly, what about these, what about the woke corporations? | ||
Are they going to put their thumb on the scale down there and try to flip this thing? | ||
Absolutely, because they want, look, they want to be able to say, hey, we're in favor of everybody voting whenever they can, have it for ten weeks, have it on Sunday, go to their homes, get drop boxes without chain of custody, mail it out to everybody. | ||
They want to be on that side. | ||
But these state senators and these House of Representatives members who have signed on to this, these Republicans, this caucus in Georgia has stood up to them. | ||
Right now they're going to come under intense heat. | ||
There's protests. | ||
They've been at their homes. | ||
But they're right now, they're standing up to the fire. | ||
That's what you have to do. | ||
You have to be able to fight back. | ||
They're going to do that. | ||
I think when it comes out of reconciliation, you're going to get a landmark bill in Georgia going to Governor Kemp's desk that Arizona is going to have to deal with. | ||
Pennsylvania's going to have to deal with it. | ||
Wisconsin's going to have to deal with it. | ||
Any Republican legislature in America is going to have to deal with these bills in Georgia because they are going to prove here's the way forward in order to have a fair and integrous balloting process, Steve. | ||
This is why we've got the station down in Atlanta. | ||
This is the center of the universe down there, as far as this goes. | ||
You've got the forensic audit that could change the whole nation, right? | ||
And put into question the whole legitimacy of Biden, right? | ||
And of which I've been saying, you've got to keep hammering that. | ||
And you've got now these new laws. | ||
They're at the tip of the spear of these new laws that could be a prototype for the rest of the country. | ||
Plus, you've got the Senate race coming up, and obviously the House race on 22. | ||
This is everything. | ||
Georgia is the center of it. | ||
John, can you please hang on, because I know we start the show here about impeachment. | ||
Vindman yesterday comes out, and he's threatening, he's going to be suing people, he should sue Raheem Kassam, abandon his podcast on the John Frederick Radio Network. | ||
Raheem, just to get us up to speed, what's the Colonel Captain General Ambassador Vindman, what is he yammering about, trying to be relevant again? | ||
Very much trying to be relevant again. | ||
So Vindman writes this blog for this... Do people remember Vindman as the Nudge? | ||
He's the Nudge that's over at... He's the Nudge that's over at one of the twin... He's the twin brother or something. | ||
He's got another brother. | ||
He's the Nudge working over at the National Security Council. | ||
I think what he really doesn't like to be referred to as is the guy who keeps getting passed over for promotion. | ||
And there are several reasons behind that. | ||
And by the way, I'm not being a mean girl, his brother is actually tweeting about it. | ||
About how Alex Vindman can't get a promotion. | ||
Right? | ||
I mean, lobbying on Twitter for a military promotion. | ||
Anyway, we'll park that for a second. | ||
So he writes this blog, right? | ||
It's the lead story on this thing called the Lawfare Blog. | ||
The Lawfare Blog is a Brookings Institution hyper-globalist website. | ||
And he writes this blog on Monday. | ||
It's entitled, Can Litigation Help De-Radicalize Right-Wing Media? | ||
And effectively what he's saying in this article is that because people disagreed with him and called him mean things along the way, that he should be well within his rights to sue them for their opinions of him and thus put us out of business. | ||
So I want to quote from you specifically. | ||
Uh, he says, during a segment on Fox News with Laura Ingram, John Yoo stated that I may have committed espionage for simply fulfilling my duties. | ||
This slanderous accusation was quickly picked up as a good point and worth discussing by Gateway Pundits Jim Hoft and Raheem Kassam explicitly questioned by loyalty and patriotism over unfounded claims of back channels and espionage on a podcast with Steve Bannon. | ||
Rudy Giuliani accused me of advising two governments. | ||
American Greatness provided a platform for attacking my character. | ||
And it goes on and on and on. | ||
And it's, honestly, it's the whiniest 900 words I've ever seen in my life. | ||
But the idea that you should be able to sue somebody because they called your patriotism into question when you're marching in your military uniform Into the skiff in the nation's capital to testify against the commander-in-chief in what we now know was a totally phony, fraudulent impeachment process which ended up in, of course, an acquittal for the president. | ||
unidentified
|
So here is the deal, Mr. Vindman. | |
Sue me. | ||
unidentified
|
I dare you. | |
Okay, Vindman. | ||
Rahim Kassam just stood down there. | ||
Before we leave, John Fredericks, John, any observations on that, because we did it on the John Fredericks Radio Network, but I also, you were one of the, you were the only guy that showed up on Radio Row on this evening of the 16th, the day of the 16th, for Trump's historic victory, because you could see over the other side of the hill. | ||
You also came down to the wall, you were down, we built the wall, you were there for the conferences we put on in the 115 degree heat. | ||
down there and I want your assessment of McCarthy, right? | ||
And the whole reason we were down there is because McCarthy's and Ryan's complete haplessness in getting a wall pushed through, money pushed through for President Trump. Observation, sir. | ||
Representative of the epitome of the feckless coward politician of our time. When he could really do something, when Kevin McCarthy could really do something about the border and the wall, he did nothing. | ||
In fact, he did everything in his power not to have it put up. | ||
Everything, along with Paul Ryan. | ||
They did everything they... | ||
Could to not get it up because their bosses are the Chamber of Commerce, Wall Street, Goldman Sachs, your former company. | ||
They want slave labor. | ||
They want cheap labor. | ||
The unholy alliance of all time is the Democrats want open borders for cheap votes and Republicans want open borders for cheap labor for their donors class. | ||
Now that it's a crisis and now that he sees political advantage and gain, now he's going to fly down there and make a speech. | ||
How nice. | ||
You did nothing. | ||
Like you said, I want facts, I want policies. | ||
What exactly are you going to do? | ||
Now they can say anything they want because they have no power. | ||
They can't get it done. | ||
You know what this reminds me of? | ||
Repeal and replace. | ||
We have a plan. | ||
We have a plan. | ||
We're going to repeal it. | ||
We have a plan. | ||
Trump wins. | ||
He says, where's your plan? | ||
We don't have a plan. | ||
We did raise money off it, though, because it was politically expedient. | ||
But we actually have no plan. | ||
Then they have to cobble it together in eight weeks. | ||
It's the same thing. | ||
When are we going to stop this, Steve? | ||
You know what? | ||
I think the Republicans win 30, 35 seats in November. | ||
I think Jim Jordan should be running for Speaker. | ||
I think he'll win. | ||
But this is the nonsense. | ||
We just have to say as Republicans we've had it with this. | ||
It gets us nowhere. | ||
We're going to win 30 to 40 to 50 seats because Trump's going to be fully engaged and they ought to elect Trump as Speaker of the House. | ||
Trump ought to be the speaker. | ||
I love it. | ||
Let's get it done. | ||
I love it. | ||
Let's get it on. | ||
John, this TV show starts on Real America's Voice. | ||
By the way, if you're going to look this good with the makeup and the lighting correct, you look marvelous. | ||
The show's going to be a big hit. | ||
Four to five o'clock? | ||
It starts tomorrow. | ||
It's called Outside the Beltway with John Fredericks on Real America's Voice Daily. | ||
Outside the Beltway with John Fredericks. | ||
It'll be on the John Fredericks Radio Network, all of our channels and stations there on our app. | ||
Also download the America's Voice app. | ||
You get it there. | ||
Also on the satellite, The Dish 219. | ||
Roku Pluto 240 channel. | ||
You can find me everywhere, but what a trifecta of truth. | ||
Doug Collins at 3 o'clock, John Fredericks at 4 outside the Beltway, Steve Bannon, War Room, 5 p.m. | ||
That's 3 to 6. | ||
You can't get better than that. | ||
Want more information? | ||
Go to my website, JohnFredericksRadio.com, JohnFredericksRadio.com. | ||
Also, if you want to see us expand, there's a donate button there every little bit. | ||
Helps us out. | ||
Thank you, Steve. | ||
John, thank you very much. | ||
Okay, quick break. | ||
Rahim's got more thoughts and then Rudy's going to join us. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
You know, we had so much to go through today. | ||
We've got tech oligarchs to go through, China, all that, that we decided to, hey, let's not be jammed with 50 guests. | ||
Let's try to do this a little differently today. | ||
It's been a different type of show, a great show. | ||
Listen, let's have a partner's discussion. | ||
Here's the discussion. | ||
We're all in this for the long haul. | ||
We need your immune system at the best it can possibly be. | ||
That's why we've partnered with a couple of companies. | ||
We've got warroomdefense.com. | ||
Go there today. | ||
You get your free vitamin D3, your free zinc. | ||
It's got the helmet of the Spartans of 300. | ||
Become a wellness warrior. | ||
We already know you're a patriot warrior. | ||
We're here to empower you. | ||
Remember, it's human action and human agency. | ||
That's what this show's about. | ||
We try to provide you the information. | ||
and the knowledge that you can have your own mental map and then boom you pull the trigger on what your action is going to be, what your empowerment is going to be. | ||
The War Room Defense Pack, just go online, go to warroomdefense.com go there today, get all the information. The zinc and the vitamin D3 are free, you got to pay shipping and handling but there's a lot more access to other things. The focus is on boosting and building your immune system. | ||
As you know from the year or so you've spent in a war room pandemic, you know that that's the key to everything. | ||
Okay. | ||
We've got a lot to go through. | ||
We've got Rudy. | ||
Now we're joined by the mayor, Rudy Giuliani. | ||
Mayor, thank you very much for joining us. | ||
I had so much else to go through with Rudy, but I got to take, and this is not punching down on Vindman. | ||
This goes back to the whole issue, and it goes back to the Washington Post lies, quite frankly, about this thing in Georgia, about this prosecutor, right, of this grand jury that's trying to indict Donald J. Trump, right, and make a name for themselves down there. | ||
This thing with Vindman, you read this, Vindman's threatening to poor Rahim, but he's thrown your name in there, he's thrown the podcast in there, implied the John Frederick's Radio Network, Real America's Voice, you know, all the things that allow this to happen. | ||
Can you give some free legal advice to poor Colonel Butler? | ||
If Vindman's legal knowledge is as sharp as his intelligence knowledge, you're seeing that the guy's not, he's a dull blade. | ||
But talk to us about what Vindman's saying. | ||
Well, first of all, just pure legal point of view, it's covered by Times against Sullivan. | ||
You have to know that you're saying something untruthful. | ||
If it's supported by anything, you're okay. | ||
And if it's your opinion, it's okay. | ||
So the chances of his recovery are very, really don't exist. | ||
But they're doing that. | ||
They're all doing that now. | ||
I mean, this is part of this strategy, because some, some of our people get very scared if they get sued and they stop the story. | ||
They had a lot of, Dominion had tremendous success in stopping stories, right? | ||
unidentified
|
So I think this has become a new game. | |
They're either going to threaten to sue or actually file a suit. | ||
What has to happen is one of these people has to get sanctioned for bringing a frivolous lawsuit and then they'll stop. | ||
So I want to put Vindman on notice here. | ||
Don't delete anything. | ||
Keep everything. | ||
Because if there is a vexatious claim here to be had, we want full discovery, and I want to know what's been going on in the background of this. | ||
Why don't you send him a letter? | ||
Because Finman uses the word defamation, Rudy, in this blog. | ||
So he is accusing me of the crime of defamation here. | ||
Yeah, you should send him a letter and you should tell him that it turns out this is baseless, which it is. | ||
You're going to seek legal fees and damages. | ||
Rule 11, Federal Rules, Civil Procedure. | ||
I did it once very successfully. | ||
But Vindman better understand, hey Vindman, go to the dictionary and look up, or have your brother look up for you, Discovery, right? | ||
We'd love to get some Discovery on you, Vindman. | ||
And take a look at Rule 11. | ||
It says you have to have a basis for bringing a lawsuit. | ||
You can't just bring it. | ||
Discovery and Vindman would show what a patriot he is. | ||
How he really believes in the chain of command. | ||
How he understands he reports to the commander-in-chief. | ||
Vindman, you'd be such an amazing patriot after discovery of your text messages and your emails and all the conversation you had. | ||
You would just be a shining example. | ||
of a good officer in the military that understands the chain of command, brother. | ||
Okay? | ||
So bring your lawsuit. | ||
Don't get out of the Brookings Institute thing. | ||
Man up, Vindman. | ||
Man up. | ||
You know, you're walking up the steps at EOB, you've got that chest pumped out, you're waiting for all the... Remember the day that they stopped taking photographs, you had to do the pose? | ||
He's, like, posing like Charles Atlas, right? | ||
You're doing the big pose over there. | ||
So don't do that. | ||
Bring it. | ||
Don't whine about it. | ||
Do it. | ||
Have some action. | ||
Maybe then you'll get that promotion. | ||
Yeah, you're an Army officer. | ||
Now we know you passed over. | ||
Courage is contagious, Vidman. | ||
Right? | ||
Courage is contagious. | ||
And now we know that he testified in a totally fraudulent frame-up. | ||
We have the hard drive that shows that the President was inquiring to the extent that he was about a real crime that was committed. | ||
I mean, they really did get lots of money from the Ukraine, and they really did fix a case in the Ukraine. | ||
And, you know, the press censored it, except for the New York Post. | ||
I have it. | ||
It's all there. | ||
Hey, but that's all, let's adjudicate that in a court of law. | ||
Vindman, the guy's name is Raheem Kassam, right? | ||
Just a suing. | ||
Don't whine about it in some blog right over the Brookings. | ||
Just stop whining, Vindman. | ||
This is the reason you got passed over. | ||
You're a whiner. | ||
Man up. | ||
Man up and suing. | ||
They're gonna sue you now. | ||
They're gonna sue you now. | ||
Okay, okay, bring it. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm just wondering, it might be worth searching that hard drive for a few other keywords as well. | |
Oh yeah, okay. | ||
I'm just wondering, it might be worth searching that hard drive for a few other keywords as well. | ||
Oh yeah, okay. | ||
Okay Rudy, we've got you. | ||
Rudy, I want to go back to the President's policies. | ||
There's a lot to cover today. | ||
We've got to go back to the border. | ||
This crisis that is a humanitarian crisis triggered by the Biden administration, by their own actions, very analogous to the migrant crisis of 2015 that essentially blew apart Angela Merkel's government. | ||
And for folks who don't follow the politics of Europe, they got crushed the other day. | ||
They got crushed the other day in these elections, correct, Rahim? | ||
Her party got She's browbeaten again. | ||
They've never recovered from her handling. | ||
What's your sense of why is the Biden administration doing this, Rudy? | ||
Why are they jamming this up when we had something that was not perfect but was at least working? | ||
Why have they determined that they're going to open the borders during a pandemic and let everybody into the country? | ||
Well, first of all, of course, they promised it during the election, but they could have they could have gotten a little time by using the pandemic as a legitimate reason not to do their open border policy. | ||
But they were pretty clear all throughout the campaign in the platform, open borders, health care for illegal immigrants, citizenship for illegal immigrants. | ||
There was no there was no holding back on that. | ||
So, I mean, I think they came in knowing they had to do it. | ||
I think what they didn't calculate was how stupid it would look to do it in the middle of this pandemic that they've made, you know, 10 times worse than it really is. | ||
And now all of a sudden they're bringing in 100,000 people and not even checking them for CCP virus. | ||
And then they put out the silliness that they were, don't come now, come later. | ||
It's a little too late. | ||
They were marched out of Nicaragua and they're halfway through Mexico when you tell them, don't come now. | ||
Plus, Biden, let me tell you, one of the things he did by pulling out that whole program of doing it in Mexico, doing asylum in Mexico, and you're not running the border, the cartels are. | ||
You don't run the border, Mexico doesn't run the border, the cartels run the border. | ||
And Trump had reversed a lot of that. | ||
It was still a work in progress, but he reversed a lot of that by doing the asylum proceedings in Mexico. | ||
And now, I mean, basically, there is vetting at the border. | ||
It's done by the Sinaloa cartel, or the Cartel del Golfo, or one of those eight cartels. | ||
Rudy, I want to shift, we've got a couple of minutes here, I want to shift to the exoneration of Rudy, what's going on in Georgia today, particularly with this, the judge ruling about this forensic analysis of these 150,000 ballots, plus the legislature is pushing through a couple of bills that the woke corporations of Coke and Home Depot and others are fighting, but HR1, I know that you've been all over me saying, hey, I don't think people understand the scale of this H.R. | ||
1 and how radical this bill is and how it's going to overwhelm all the great work they're doing in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, etc. | ||
What is your specific concerns about H.R. | ||
1 that the American people ought to know about? | ||
Well, there are a lot of provisions in it, but maybe the one that would explain it the best is there will be universal mail-in ballots. | ||
In other words, everyone will get one. | ||
A hundred million mail-in ballots will be sent out. | ||
It's going to be mandated that you have to send out a mail-in ballot, absentee ballot. | ||
It'll be 100,000 to 130,000 voting around the United States four or five weeks before the election. | ||
There's no question that mail-in ballots offer tremendous opportunity for fraud. | ||
Most European countries have either done away with mail-in ballots or they accompany it with something we don't do, which is voter identification, IDs, voter IDs. | ||
And they limit it to people that are abroad. | ||
Most European countries are going back to paper ballots now, after having had, you know, scandals. | ||
And that's exactly what we should be doing. | ||
unidentified
|
But just think of this. | |
There's going to be no signature. | ||
unidentified
|
You don't have to put a signature on the paper ballot. | |
You don't have to show ID. | ||
unidentified
|
You could send in 50. | |
Nobody would know it. | ||
You could go around, grab 50 ballots and send it in. | ||
It's totally insane not to have a signature or a photo ID. | ||
There will be no way to verify A mail-in ballot. | ||
That's what the law says. | ||
Photo identification cannot be required. | ||
unidentified
|
It's illegal to require photo identification. | |
A person wants to show it to you, fine. | ||
But if you require it as a condition of voting, then that's illegal. | ||
That's completely nuts. | ||
We've got about 30 seconds in this segment, but is this insanity? | ||
A hundred million mail-in ballots given all the problems we just had on November 3rd? | ||
But they understand this is how they're going to perpetuate their rule, right? | ||
By the mail-in ballots that can't be certified, no chain of custody. | ||
I mean, it's like saying we should just allow Democrats to start every election with, you know, 70% of the vote for them and then we can always have 30 and we're going to keep it that way. | ||
I mean it completely destroys any possibility of a fair election. | ||
unidentified
|
That is exactly what happens in the UK now. | |
That is exactly what happens in the UK now. | ||
The Labour Party starts with its mail-in 70% and then everyone else has to catch up. | ||
Short break, we'll bring back the Mayor. | ||
After this short break we're going to talk about why the National Guard wasn't up here on the 6th next with Raheem Kassam in the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, the great team over at MyPillow, that's Mike Lindell, the Patriots that are continuing to fight on this voter fraud. | ||
He's fighting every day in every possible way. | ||
A true hero. | ||
MyPillow.com. | ||
Go there today, use the promo code WAROOM. | ||
You have to do that to get up to the 66% discounts. | ||
Of course, Raheem Ghassan sitting there looking at the slippers he just ordered. | ||
It's incredibly well made. | ||
Yeah, I know, it's fantastic. | ||
And you can wear these outside? | ||
This is like rubber soling and all this? | ||
Raheem's very happy with his purchase of the slippers. | ||
You've got the moccasins plus Giza sheets and of course the pillows. | ||
Queen size, $40 discount. | ||
Throw another five bucks in to get the king size. | ||
But just go over to MyPillow.com, put in the promo code WARDROOM and just go through all the 120 products and you'll see there's a lot there for the entire family. | ||
I want to thank Mike Lindell and the great team at MyPillow. | ||
They've been a great sponsor. | ||
Okay, Rahim, I want to go through this issue now with the Washington Post, what happened on January 6th. | ||
You've done a deep dive on this, so I want to take your time and analyze this thing. | ||
Well, let me start by saying I've just written an email to Amy Gardner, who actually reported the Georgia story. | ||
Amy Gardner of the Washington Post? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
The lead reporter? | ||
Yeah. | ||
Pretty good reporter. | ||
National reporter. | ||
Well apparently not. | ||
She's got a reputation for being a pretty tough reporter. | ||
She's the one that only went on one source. | ||
I think you're the only person that's brought that up. | ||
Right. | ||
Isn't that an editor's problem too? | ||
Absolutely. | ||
I've written to her and asked her if she can confirm, based on the correction they use the word source not sources, so I've asked her to confirm that she used a single source. | ||
To make the wild claims about what the President of the United States allegedly said, we now know didn't say. | ||
To get him indicted. | ||
To get him indicted. | ||
And then I asked further, will you be resigning from the Washington Post as a means by which to show the public and your readership that there are in fact accountability processes for reporters, or will you become the embodiment of your paper's own phrase, democracy dies in darkness? | ||
So let's see. | ||
As a point of honor, you're saying she should resign? | ||
I would have thought so. | ||
I mean, if I had made a mistake like that. | ||
Bungling isn't the word. | ||
The basic thing a reporter has to do in the world is not objectivity. | ||
We always focus on objectivity, right? | ||
Objectivity is just this veneer of non-partisanship that actually no human being can reasonably be held up to that standard. | ||
The basic thing a reporter has to do is make sure the truth is in their reporting, not falsehoods are in their reporting. You could put whatever spin on it you like, you can editorialize, you can do whatever you like, but it has to be based on facts and this just wasn't. So I want to understand what the accountability process is here because you know Vindman's up there on the lawfare block in cahoots with the Brookings Institution saying you know right-wingers should be sued | ||
for their opinions, you know that's a way to hold them accountable, hold their opinions accountable, but we've got no accountability process for the corporate media who are actually feeding us lies and and destroying public trust in not just journalism as an institution but in other institutions such as the office of the President of the United States. | ||
Let me just go back to something Rudy said about the blog that Vindman's on. | ||
It's called Lawfare. | ||
It's using the legal courts as part of warfare, information warfare. | ||
And this is what Rudy's talking about, these letters that go around to try to shut you up. | ||
What Vindman's trying to do is use the legal process for information warfare. | ||
That's why the blog is called Hello Lawfare. | ||
So, Vindman, you're too much of a wimp. | ||
Rahim's calling you out, suing. | ||
We want to see the discovery, Vindman. | ||
And by the way, can they maybe take away Vindman? | ||
You see the discovery and see all the times in there that Vindman may have, I'm sure we're going to find this in Discovery, not followed the chain of command. | ||
I don't know, maybe they take his pension away. | ||
unidentified
|
Maybe. | |
Hey, don't know. | ||
We have a phrase in, you know, football fans, soccer fans have a phrase, come and have a go if you think you're hard enough, you know? | ||
So, come and have a go if you think you're hard enough. | ||
Okay, let's get into the Washington Post today. | ||
Another explosive story about January 6th. | ||
Now we don't know whether to trust this or not, right, given their form, but I did notice that certain things in this Washington Post story that dropped this morning leapt off the page to me, specifically because we're still not getting answers about the National Guard here in Washington, D.C. | ||
I think they put up a new razor wire in the last couple of days. | ||
It looks nice and shiny and spiffy. | ||
Really beautiful, obviously, for Capitol Hill residents to see. | ||
I've read this paper every day since I was a paper boy. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a big Washington Post fan. | |
Before the Bezos era. | ||
So let me walk you through this. | ||
Pay attention to this. | ||
You know, connoisseurs of information surrounding January the 6th, people like myself, people like Darren Beattie, for us, this will set alarm bells ringing immediately. | ||
For the general public, I think you can easily gloss over this and not realize what the details are here. | ||
So I'm going to walk you through it right here. | ||
Okay. | ||
So the story is, Army initially pushed to deny district's request for National Guard before Jan 6th. | ||
The Army initially pushed to reject the D.C. | ||
government's request for a modest National Guard presence ahead of the January 6th rally that led to the Capitol riot, underscoring the deep reluctance of some higher-ups at the Pentagon to involve the military in security arrangements that day. | ||
In an internal draft memo obtained by the Washington Post, the Army said the U.S. | ||
military shouldn't be needed to help with police and traffic and crowd management, as city officials had requested, unless more than 100,000 demonstrators were expected. | ||
Now, here's where it gets interesting. | ||
It goes on. | ||
The Army leadership made its position clear in deliberations at the Pentagon the weekend before the event, citing those reasons, among others, according to four people familiar with the discussions who, like others in this report, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss Internal Defense Department matters. | ||
The Army ultimately relented after facing pressure from Acting Defense Secretary Christopher C. Miller and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark A. Milley, and realizing that district officials weren't going to turn to the Justice Department for help instead, as the Army had wanted their sources claimed. | ||
So that is Trump's New, relatively new at that point. | ||
Well, interim. | ||
Interim, acting defence secretary stepping in and saying, hey, you have to protect the capital. | ||
You have to be deployed there against the wishes of people at the Pentagon who didn't want to supply the district with the National Guard that they said they needed. | ||
So here, but here is where it really gets interesting, because later on in the article, They actually state that the reason that the optics, remember we heard about the optics, the reason they were fearful of the optics situation was because of what happened at Lafayette Square, Lafayette Park, outside the White House, when the media heavily criticized | ||
The National Guard being deployed by Donald Trump to protect the White House, remember? | ||
Oh yeah. | ||
You had all the BLM riots, you had Black Lives Matter plaza, and specifically the claim is made that the fears of over-militarization, as the Washington Post puts it, came from the fact that lawmakers and retired military personnel appeared alongside President Trump as federal law enforcement cleared They used the words racial justice protesters near the White House using force and pepper balls. | ||
They also faced blowback more broadly for militarizing Washington with more than 5,000 National Guard troops in the city and 1,600 active duty forces amassed nearby in response to the unrest that followed the killing of George Floyd. | ||
So there we have it, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Now you know why it happened. | ||
Now you know everything that took place. | ||
You're told right here, very clearly, there was actually Trump's staff, Trump's acting Secretary of Defense, who had to go and tell the army, I don't care if you don't like the media beating up on you over the optics, get the National Guard into place! | ||
And you also now know the rationale, and I know most of you would have suspected this all along, but we now have it in black and white in front of us. | ||
According to this document that the Washington Post claims to have seen, the optics fear was because of what happened during the BLM riots because the media criticized Donald Trump. | ||
So far from this being a Trump caused situation, this is actually an establishment and a media caused situation. | ||
Rudy, I know you may be restricted on what you can say. | ||
Of course, that's never stopped you before. | ||
But any observations about this really explosive story that's breaking in the Washington Post today? | ||
Well, I think this is an indication of how anxious they are to always do a story that hurts Trump. | ||
So they'll go with one source when they otherwise wouldn't. | ||
I mean, that was a The first story that Rahim was talking about was extremely damaging at the time. | ||
Extremely damaging because of the investigation that's going on. | ||
And to do it with just one source is totally reckless. | ||
The recent one, what was going on in the Pentagon, it's just, I think, a battle over not wanting to be... Hang on, Rudy, hang on for one second. | ||
I just want to go back to a point you made. | ||
Rahim, to Rudy's point, We would never really have known it was one source, even reading the original article, until they were forced to do the correction. | ||
It was in the correction, and you caught the fact that they said a source, right? | ||
They would have never fessed up to this, and Rudy's point's right. | ||
That is so critical. | ||
Remember, you've got a district attorney down there that I think's impaneled a grand jury. | ||
They're trying to find a way to indict Trump over these phone calls, right? | ||
And we would have never found out. | ||
That this was from a source, if it had not, if the tape had not come out where you got the transcript, and you saw that they completely misrepresented what went on. | ||
I think Rudy's point about this investigation, about the grand jury and the investigation, how important it is, and how important that piece of the evidence was. | ||
I wonder about the relationship between a reporter and the source, you know, the ethical relationship between a reporter and a source, if what the source tells you is incorrect. | ||
You know, if the source has told you a lie, are they still a source? | ||
Well, this is why you have multiple sources. | ||
But I'm just saying, should we now not know who the source was? | ||
unidentified
|
Because the information wasn't... That's a question for Rudy. | |
He represented Fox for years, and Rupert for years, and others for years. | ||
unidentified
|
Rudy, what's the legality on that? | |
Actually, the source would have to be revealed if, for example, the President sued for... I mean, he would have a very good suit for defamation. | ||
I'm going to go talk to him, but the reality is to get over Chimes against Sullivan, you have to either know it's false or be grossly reckless. | ||
Get the president's lawyer on the phone. | ||
I'm gonna go talk to him, but the reality is to get over chimes against Sullivan, you have to either know it's false or be grossly reckless. | ||
Well, this is reckless as you can possibly be to go with one source against a president of the United States, a former president of the United States, in a situation where that person could be indicted. | ||
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
I think the president would have a very good lawsuit. | ||
Then you would have to reveal the source or go to prison. | ||
Rudy, walk us through, tell us about the podcast. | ||
How do people get all the access to your content? | ||
What's your coordinates and social media? | ||
We haven't had you on enough here recently because you've been so busy. | ||
Rudy's commonsense.com is where to go. | ||
And we have right now an interview with Jocko Boyens about the sex trafficking, child trafficking That is being exacerbated tremendously by this open border situation. | ||
It was bad enough during the pandemic, when kids were at home, because the method of choice now is not kidnapping kids, it's using the internet. | ||
unidentified
|
So these kids were trapped in front of the internet, and sex trafficking with children went up dramatically. | |
Now, these children are brought in, some of them specifically for the purpose of human trafficking. | ||
Make the point I made before, the cartels are running the border. | ||
My podcast, the last two were about that. | ||
Fabulous. | ||
We're going to promote those and push them hard. | ||
That's Rudy's Common Sense is about the cartels and the exploitation of children. | ||
Real quickly, what's your social media handles so people can follow you? | ||
Just Rudy Giuliani. | ||
Get me on Twitter. | ||
Assuming they haven't taken me off for a few days or something. | ||
Mayor Giuliani, thank you very much. | ||
We'll be looking forward to that suit from the President. | ||
Good work, Rudy! | ||
unidentified
|
You're told to call me if you need anything. | |
Good work. | ||
Rudy, thank you very much, sir. | ||
America's Mayor Rudy Giuliani. | ||
unidentified
|
Rahim, every now and again, you bring it. | |
What do you mean every day? | ||
I think Vindman, I think, no, no, no, it's Natalie Winters. | ||
They're the workers over at the polls. | ||
Vindman got you fired up. | ||
Okay, we'll be back in a second. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
I work for a company that is doing a lot of damage in the world. | ||
Facebook and Google are no longer companies, they're countries. | ||
They must be stopped. | ||
The company needs to step in and break up Google and Facebook. | ||
It's a better thing for the world. | ||
The single biggest thing is, this company needs to be broken up. | ||
No king in the history of the world has been the ruler of two billion people. | ||
But Mark Zuckerberg is. | ||
Today, Sajid Farhatas undercover journalists have exposed another high-level executive at Facebook. | ||
Mark Zuckerberg is very concerned with health. | ||
In fact, his Chan Zuckerberg initiative... I'm fascinated and terrified at the same time. | ||
By CRISPR, he should be. | ||
It's eugenics. | ||
I don't know any way to stop it. | ||
I think the genie's out of the bottle. | ||
Which is why a lot of shit goes down, because people aren't paying attention. | ||
I can target racist people using just those three things. | ||
It's that easy. | ||
Because data is very powerful. | ||
You need five things about you, and I can pretty much figure out everything else. | ||
AI is essentially evolving to become like human intelligence, and then it's going to go beyond human intelligence. | ||
And at that point, Humans are expendable. | ||
It's not like the AI will try to kill us. | ||
They just won't care because it'll be so superior that it'll be like, these people don't matter. | ||
So I might be killing hundreds of ants when I walk in the park. | ||
I don't know. | ||
And I don't care. | ||
It's not a thing that I think about. | ||
We will be like those ants. | ||
What if the tech companies like Google and Facebook remain unchecked? | ||
Where do we go from there? | ||
What's going to happen? | ||
What's going to happen? | ||
Bad things. | ||
We confronted Thomas, asked him to join our team of insiders. | ||
Here's what happened. | ||
I just want to let you know that I intend to release our conversations to the American people. | ||
You shouldn't do that. | ||
Are you interested in interviewing on the record with us to clarify your statements to the American people? | ||
No. Hello? Hey Benny. Wow that is as explosive as it gets. | ||
We're going to have the extended version go through that on the evening show. | ||
By the way, this reinforces here what he was saying about transhumanism, about artificial intelligence, about the e-word eugenics. | ||
Write that down. | ||
We talked about nomenclature. | ||
When you hear about transhumanism, you hear me start going on these rants, which I'm going to be going on more and more. | ||
We want to give you a programming tip. | ||
On Holy Saturday, we're going to do a special on transhumanism and what's the state of what's playing. | ||
This thing is out in the open, but nobody wants to talk about it. | ||
That is a senior executive at Facebook. | ||
He's saying, forget 230, 230. | ||
I have said from day one, None of these have to be regulated. | ||
They have to be broken up like they broke up AT&T back in the 80s. | ||
Facebook needs to not just be regulated, I think, as a public utility, but it needs to be broken up first and then regulated. | ||
He's saying it's too out of control. | ||
This reinforces something that we're saying here on the show every day. | ||
That's why we've now entered into this arrangement where we've got to go to warroomdefense.com. | ||
It's imperative upon you, the responsibility is on you to get your immune system up. | ||
To the best it can be. | ||
And we're here to help. | ||
Go to GetTheWormDefensePack, right? | ||
On WormDefense.com. | ||
Make your own decisions, right? | ||
We're about empowering human agency. | ||
That would be your agency. | ||
But go there today. | ||
The zinc and the vitamin D3 are free. | ||
You gotta pay shipping and handling, but there's a lot more there, too. | ||
Make sure you go to today. | ||
Rahim, we've got a bunch to go through. | ||
I also want to talk about what's happening with the beheading of these children. | ||
By ISIS. | ||
Another explosive story that's breaking, that we're going to get into more in the days and weeks ahead, if people didn't have enough on their plate. | ||
But you know what? | ||
Hey, that's why the deplorables, it's on your shoulders, it's all going to rest. | ||
Akif, I'm telling you, Veritas is doing amazing work. | ||
This is chilling. | ||
When you hear this executive, who very matter of fact, this is a smart guy, very matter of fact, he's talking about how they control and what they control Facebook, but then he gets into my favorite topic. | ||
Right? | ||
He gets it, and that's why people, if you get a chance, by the way, you pounded yesterday by Josh Rogin's book, it's great. | ||
But, Get Code Breaker, about the Nobel Prize winner, also RNA, it'll really tell you, and it's about, the subtitle is, the future of the human race. | ||
The future of the human race. | ||
Okay? | ||
Really, it talks to you about the beginning of the post-human race. | ||
And that's what he's saying right there. | ||
This is where Zuckerberg and his wife are spending their time. | ||
right? He talked about artificial intelligence. The artificial general intelligence is so going to overpower and these are guys who spend all their time thinking about that, right? AI? This can't be the same Mark Zuckerberg that paid all that money into counties across America to have the election end a certain way. | ||
That would be the same Mark Zuckerberg and his wife in his own account. | ||
Not with Facebook. | ||
350 million dollars. | ||
Which, by the way, as Phil Klein brings up, is as much money as the federal government put into elections throughout the nation. | ||
It's not the absolute dollar amount. | ||
It is what it compares to other people. | ||
It wrote a 350 million dollar check. | ||
The guy who influenced the elections is the same guy who owns all the data. | ||
It's the same guy. | ||
They're talking about eugenics. | ||
Eugenics. | ||
This is what they don't want to talk about. | ||
We're going to be getting into the details of this. | ||
The Cold Harbor Lab up there in Cold Harbor on the Hudson? | ||
By the way, she's making presentations up there, right, about RNA years ago, and she's a brilliant scientist and quite amazingly impressive. | ||
Just the grit and determination. | ||
But when they're having these big seminars and conferences, they're at Cold Springs Harbor up there, and it's, hey, guess what? | ||
What were they doing 100 years ago? | ||
Eugenics. | ||
The E word. | ||
They don't want to talk about it. | ||
You heard him right there. | ||
It's like stepping on ants. | ||
This is like stepping on ants. | ||
It's not conspiracy, but they're no coincidences. | ||
When you see where the money's going, and here's what it is. | ||
They ain't looking to make it better. | ||
They say down syndrome and genetic faults and everything like that. | ||
That's all the happy talk in the front. | ||
This is about they want eternal life for themselves, right? | ||
They want eternal life for themselves. | ||
Not eternal life through a religious practice or believe in a religious or spiritual practice. | ||
They want to do it materialistically. | ||
They are radical and they're taking us down a path that we must become. | ||
Mankind is asleep and we must wake up to this. | ||
We must make conscious decisions. | ||
What's happening now? | ||
Things are just happening. | ||
Just because it happens. | ||
Okay, Raheem, what do you got on the podcast today? | ||
Well, firstly, delete your Facebook accounts, okay? | ||
Seriously, delete your Facebook accounts. | ||
Everyone. | ||
Just tell your friends and family, hey, just put a post, say, hey, look, this account's going, get in touch with me, all these other ways. | ||
Delete your Facebook accounts. | ||
The podcast, I'm going to run through this Washington Post report. | ||
Brilliant. | ||
Because you put this in conjunction with what we've learned. | ||
I may actually listen to it today. | ||
Maybe one day you'll come on it when you get the invite. | ||
But the detail now that we have, this is totally exonerating for Trump. | ||
So listen. | ||
The podcast, it's the hot... Rudy's and Raheem's are the two hottest podcasts around there, okay? | ||
We'll be back at five. | ||
We'll be breaking news at five o'clock, okay? | ||
So join us back in the War Room. | ||
Raheem Kazan, Stephen King Bannon. |