March 10, 2021 - Bannon's War Room
48:24
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well, the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than 100 possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always. | ||
| Because if you don't and the worst happens... | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| I'm not a fan of hers, and I would say this, and she probably has heard that, but I wish a lot of luck to Harry, because he's going to need it. | ||
| Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States, another called shot. | ||
| Look, we want to thank, today, Mike Lindell's out in Arizona at an event. | ||
| We'll get the details on that later, but it's to support this continuing investigation. | ||
| They're going to do a forensic audit out there. | ||
| They're going to hand count and go through doing a forensic audit. | ||
| 2.1 million ballots, hard ballots, from Maricopa County. | ||
| Mike Lindell's been one of the driving forces in the back of all of this. | ||
| We're very honored to be in partnership with MyPillow. | ||
| We've got our own promo code. | ||
| Go to MyPillow.com today. | ||
| Promo code War Room. | ||
| 110 products. | ||
| We get up to 66% discounts on a bunch of them, but discounts across the board. | ||
| So make sure you support the MyPillow team, Mike Lindell, in the War Room by going to MyPillow.com and promo code War Room. | ||
| How prescient is Trump? | ||
| I mean, he says, I'm not a fan and I wish him well. | ||
| What's your take from a community? | ||
| Here's the reason we've covered this. | ||
| We've had Nigel on. | ||
| Raheem's done an amazing job. | ||
| When Jen Psaki, in the briefing room, gets in the middle of it, and then we had Hillary Clinton yesterday, we played that in the cold open for Nigel, she's throwing down and saying, you know, it's about racism and all this stuff, right? | ||
| When they're taking positions, now you're talking about the institutions of the United States government and, you know, the country we've got the special relationship with, right? | ||
| It used to be called our mother country. | ||
| And now you've got the Church of England, you've got the Crown, all of it, from a communications point of view. | ||
| The White House with Psaki and with Clinton getting in the middle of this. | ||
| What's your take on this? | ||
| Oh, completely idiotic. | ||
| I mean, I gotta give Meghan Markle credit for one thing, though. | ||
| She has, in a way that maybe not since World War II, she's found a way to unite the United States and Great Britain together in this hatred towards Meghan Markle, and realizing just how everything from the... Well, you think woke culture is on her side, don't you think? | ||
| Oh, it is. | ||
| In fact, that's... You're saying unite the... Because everyone's shaking their head and saying... | ||
| Yeah, what is, I mean, you know, everything from the greed to, you know, well, we have to have security, to wanting the payments, to the stories. | ||
| And actually, one of the things I was talking to the President this morning when I was coming in, you know, we went through talking about H.R.1, and I told him I was going to join you on the show, and he said, oh, you know, if you want, you can make a little news on Megan. | ||
| And I'm thinking, you know, President Trump says Megan, so wait, did Megyn Kelly say something new? | ||
| That's what I'm thinking, right? | ||
| Cause I'm having flashbacks, you know, I'm like getting triggered for 2016. | ||
| He's like, no, you know, uh, Megan, she just gave the interview. | ||
| I'm like, oh, Megan Markle. | ||
| He goes, yeah. | ||
| She's like, she's no good. | ||
| I said, she's no good. | ||
| And now everybody's seeing it. | ||
| And just like how we call it with Anthony Weiner's laptop, here it is with Megan Markle being no good. | ||
| But he said, and here's what he goes, but you realize if you say anything negative, About Meghan Markle, you get canceled. | ||
| He goes, look at Piers. | ||
| He goes, Piers, he goes, I'm on team Piers. | ||
| He goes, Piers Morgan is the best. | ||
| He's the greatest. | ||
| And they went trying to cancel him simply because he criticized Meghan Markle. | ||
| And it's just, this is just the latest chapter of Wilk culture. | ||
| We're actually learning that they refuse to allow him to speak his mind. | ||
| Remember, he carries that morning show, Piers Morgan, in the UK. | ||
| That morning show, people should understand, is like the Today Show here. | ||
| They call it Breakfast Show. | ||
| That is the morning show in the United Kingdom. | ||
| Yeah, you've done it. | ||
| You've said that. | ||
| Yeah, I was over there when President Trump was there. | ||
| And he carries that show. | ||
| It'll be nothing without him. | ||
| And they will get no viewers. | ||
| He was woke sympathetic, Piers Morgan. | ||
| He was willing to listen to the argument. | ||
| First off, he ran the mirror. | ||
| He's run left-wing tabloids. | ||
| He was a guy that broke memory. | ||
| But he wasn't always woke. | ||
| He was kind of like this woke-reactionary hybrid, right? | ||
| But what we learn now... That's what you have to be in British society to get invited to the right club. | ||
| That's true. | ||
| You don't get invited to the dinners unless you're quasi-woke. | ||
| And we now know that Meghan Markle actually sent a letter to ITV, the channel, explicitly criticizing and calling for an investigation into Piers Morgan's remarks. | ||
| No, no, but you got to understand, because Nigel talked about this yesterday, explain to the American audience about this oversight board of why you can't even, you don't have the freedoms, you don't have the freedoms in the United Kingdom that we do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're the third person to ask me about Ofcom in the last 24 hours. | |
| It's important because they actually, you have much, when you're watching BBC and you watch these things, you guys have much less freedoms than we have and my point is, we're heading in that direction. | ||
| For sure, for sure. | ||
| It's so funny because Ofcom is really, I mean you've got to be in the weeds to know about Ofcom. | ||
| I've been talking about Ofcom for a decade. | ||
| Nobody ever wanted to listen to me. | ||
| I'm pretty sure I've had just articles rejected talking about this, the British regulator, right? | ||
| And what it is, is it's, it, bills itself as an independent regulator of what's broadcast. | ||
| So let's say there are 5,000 complaints about something you say on television. | ||
| Ofcom will then investigate. | ||
| The problem is, Ofcom is, as Jake Tapper even noted this morning on Twitter, Ofcom is actually broadcast veterans who have worked to all of these broadcasters, who then form the board of Ofcom. | ||
| So it's kind of a self-regulating system. | ||
| It doesn't really... | ||
| And so they'll always whitewash their buddies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
and and this is why it doesn't really but they were going to watch whitewash They had 40,000 complaints, correct? | |
| Well, Piers Morgan is not a buddy of any of theirs, right? | ||
| Piers Morgan is actually a thorn in the side of the people who are at places like Ofcom, because they are the liberal elite intelligentsia. | ||
| And Piers Morgan, as much as he is woke sympathetic, just doesn't fit into those rooms anymore. | ||
| He's seen as a dinosaur. | ||
| He's way too reactionary. | ||
| He was talking yesterday about his co-host's miniskirt on air. | ||
| You know, it doesn't play anymore with these guys. | ||
| So it's funny that you mentioned Ofcom. | ||
| But just very quickly, I want to go to some of the polling on this now. | ||
| So there's obviously a lot of polling coming out of the United Kingdom on the public opinion towards these things. | ||
| So positive, negative. | ||
| The Queen, 79% positive. | ||
| Prince Philip, 59% positive. | ||
| Prince Charles, 52% positive. | ||
| Prince William, 78% positive. | ||
| Almost as popular as the screen. | ||
| Kate's got to have an 8 or 9 in front of it. | ||
| Kate, 71% positive. | ||
| Prince Harry, 54% positive. | ||
| Meghan, 41% positive. | ||
| That's from the British public over there. | ||
| That's a stunning number. | ||
| I thought that number would be much higher. | ||
| Upside down. | ||
| Not heading in the right direction. | ||
| Here's the thing about, they've asked these guys, you know, and they were on peers, because he said, I don't believe a word she said. | ||
| Right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Look, I don't know. | ||
| He's been on a date with her. | ||
| They went and had, they went to a pub. | ||
| He thought it was a date. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| I think the way I saw is that they met and had a drink because he wanted to know more about her life story. | ||
| Or words to that effect. | ||
| She got ghosted as soon as she drank. | ||
| Bigger, better deal came along. | ||
| Bigger, better deal came along. | ||
| Bigger than the morning show. | ||
| That she didn't Google the guy. | ||
| She didn't Google Harry. | ||
| Just kind of ran into him somewhere. | ||
| What I'm saying is he's met her in person. | ||
| Yes, yes, yes. | ||
| He knows the mannerisms. | ||
| They spent hours together. | ||
| She's also an actress. | ||
| Here's the thing, I don't know, and people I'm sure are investigating, the Daily Mail's got investigating team on it. | ||
| The one, and I think this crossed the line, about her marriage. | ||
| She said she got married three days in advance. | ||
| I think she said by the Archbishop of Canterbury, right? | ||
| That she got married before the event. | ||
| To me, that is pretty cut and dry. | ||
| Somebody on the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Church of England ought to step up, which I think the Queen is still the head of the Church of England, right? | ||
| The ecclesiastic head is the Archbishop of Canterbury. | ||
| Somebody ought to just come forward and say, hey, Was the two billion viewers watching at Windsor, was that all a sham? | ||
| Did poor George Clooney come over from his estate in Lake Cuomo in Italy? | ||
| Did he fly over as a global elite? | ||
| Did he come over as a global elite? | ||
| Did Oprah show up to a sham? | ||
| Did they just show up to something that was a stage setting because they'd already been married? | ||
| Rahim, how come you can't get an answer on something that's basic and to me as explosive Almost as the other charges of systemic racism which they put, which Yasha threw out there. | ||
| Well the genius, Jason jump in here because the audience is complaining you're not talking enough. | ||
| Jump in here, from a communications perspective. | ||
| It's like the old days. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| She's actually done, you know, quite a smart thing. | ||
| If you're gonna lie, lie a lot. | ||
| right? Just make it all lies, dump it all out there so it just fogs everything up. | ||
| And that's what that interview was. It was an hour of her lying and blinking a billion times, you know, while she was doing it. And then they bring on Harry for an hour and go, Harry, was she right about what she said? And he's like, yeah, yeah, yeah, sure. | ||
| He has no idea what she was talking about. | ||
| Have we now entered the Cash Me Outside chapter of the monarchy? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that where we are? | |
| That this is just all, how do we go and get paid? | ||
| How do we go and make money? | ||
| Can we get the, can we get the Disney deal? | ||
| Can we get the, I mean, look, they're living in, where are they living in? | ||
| North of L.A. | ||
|
unidentified
|
or? | |
| Santa Barbara. | ||
| Santa Barbara. | ||
| Montecito, right? | ||
| Montecito, so they're, you know, next door to Oprah. | ||
| Santa Barbara's not good enough, so they're in the nicest suburb of Santa Barbara, Montecito. | ||
| Right, and so this is, they're not even in the UK anymore, they're in the US, trying to get paid, trying to monetize every single thing that comes at them. | ||
| I know Oprah said they're not getting paid for this, we saw the reports there. | ||
| They're getting some, okay, it might not be a direct wire from CBS to, you know, Harry and Meghan, but... Oprah got 7 million bucks, you'd think the guys get a little something for the effort, don't you? | ||
| They're getting some cash. | ||
| They have to be getting some cash somehow. | ||
| They're finding some way. | ||
| They've got to get better negotiators. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| They're going to find a way to monetize it in some way. | ||
| But Rahim, do folks back in London just look at this and shake their head and say, this really is kind of the final straw with the monarchy? | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| Because it's just making a mockery of it. | ||
| You had the Diana situation, you had the abdication. | ||
| Is this the third big blow? | ||
| Because every time I come on BBC it's a monarchy in crisis. | ||
| The amazing thing about it, well of course, the people in London, as in The people in New York, you know, the equivalents? | ||
| Yeah, sure. | ||
| They are increasingly Republican in their attitudes. | ||
| But the rest of the country is actually becoming more pro-monarchy as an institution as a result of this. | ||
| You have to understand, the monarchy is not about the family. | ||
| It's not about Liz, it's not about Phil, it's not about Harry. | ||
| You get good monarchs, you get bad monarchs. | ||
| I keep saying this to people because there's a lot of whiners out there going, why do I care about this? | ||
| I don't care about this. | ||
| You have to understand, That this is about a civilization, it is about a system of government, it is about your ally, it is about your connection in government to God, right? | ||
| That's what the monarchy is, that's why they have the anointing oil when a monarch gets crowned. | ||
| And so you have to understand that the public, the wider public, who value tradition, And who value things, you know, conservatism, to conserve things from generation to generation. | ||
| They are moving more towards saying, hey, this is actually something that guards us against the machinations of politics and the politicians and the elected cycle. | ||
| And, you know, we've now semi-democratized the House of Lords as well, in the sense that it's no longer hereditary. | ||
| That's semi-democratized. | ||
| She democratized it. | ||
| And made that for sale too. | ||
| Well, it's not elected. | ||
| What I'm saying is it's now the caprice of the Prime Minister at the time to appoint people to the House of Lords. | ||
| So now that's all partisan political now also. | ||
| It's not captains of industry in there anymore. | ||
| And by the way, I feel the same way about your Senate here. | ||
| Do you think she was telling the truth? | ||
| About what? | ||
| the people it should be the way it was right which is which i don't know maybe the state legislatures right because otherwise why why have two chambers in that in that sense you know the point was to balance so there's all of these questions that are being raised right now by this silly little oprah interview which people are people are people are now wrestling with how important monarchy is an institution is to do you think she was telling the truth about what i don't know let's say truth about her name that's do you think she's telling truth about the the racial racially insensitive comments that supposedly | ||
| happen. | ||
| I imagine that at some point, somebody may have said to her, you know, when the baby comes out, you're going to want to choose the best lighting and color and everything for your official portrait. | ||
| And given the baby's complexion, we recommend you do this or that and the other. | ||
| And she's gone, You saying my baby's black? | ||
| Then you're saying she's not lying. | ||
| No, I'm not saying she's not lying. | ||
| I'm saying she's taken a normal process conversation wildly out of context to make it a conversation about race instead of a conversation about, you know, having your portrait done. | ||
| Is the crown systemically racist or not? | ||
| That's the question. | ||
| We've asked that three times over three days and the answer that you'll continue to get is no, and the answer you'll continue to get from the British public is no, because they know what they've seen. | ||
| I want to make sure you give me the same answer. | ||
| It was yesterday, yesterday it was no, today yes. | ||
| Now look, firstly, you always get, and here's the thing, people go, oh you're a good abandon the monarchy, abandon the monarchy. | ||
| Look, you get bad presidents as well. | ||
| You're living through one right now. | ||
| And that doesn't mean you throw out the office of the President of the United States. | ||
| And just because we may have a bad king or a bad queen or a bad member of the royal family, you don't throw out the institution of the monarchy. | ||
| The monarchy is not the family. | ||
| The monarchy is the constitution. | ||
| It is the crown in Parliament that creates the United Kingdom. | ||
| Without it, there isn't one. | ||
| Is Meghan the Hunter Biden of the monarchy? | ||
| I'll have to see her laptop. | ||
| She doesn't know how to cash out quite as well as that guy does. | ||
| Okay, we're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're going to return in The War Room in just a second. | |
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, we've got the original team from Order of Impeachment. | ||
| Jason Miller joins us today as our co-host, Institute co-host, along with Rahim Ghassan. | ||
| You know that this show from the very beginning is about kind of putting information out there that you can get your own mental model, but the nomenclature, the statics and dynamics of process, critical path, all of it, so you can make your own decisions, but it all leads to It all leads to human agency and human action. | ||
| If you're going to be a patriot warrior, and that's what we're organizing here as Patriot Warriors, you've got to be a health warrior. | ||
| We've got a company now that's partnered with us. | ||
| We've got a million bottles of vitamin D3 and also zinc. | ||
| It starts off, go to warroomdefense.com and once you go there, you can get the War Room Defense Pack. | ||
| You also get all tons of information. | ||
| I want to thank you and remember, This is all about energy, it's all about focus, it's all about keeping you healthy. | ||
| We've got on the bottles, we've got the helmets of the Spartans, so be one of the 300 and go to warroomdefense.com today. | ||
| Okay, we've got a lot of wood to chop here and not a lot of time. | ||
| I want to go to this COVID bill. | ||
| People don't understand this COVID-19 bill. | ||
| It's 1.9 trillion a day. | ||
| It's going to be, and Bannon said it first, Infrastructure bill, I said weeks ago, is coming in the fall. | ||
| It's now not going to be $2 trillion. | ||
| It's going to be $4 trillion. | ||
| It's going to be $2 trillion in infrastructure and $2 trillion on Green New Deal. | ||
| That is $6 trillion they're going to add to the balance sheet of the United States. | ||
| Basically, the Federal Reserve is going to give them the cash, but it's got to be paid for. | ||
| They're going to have to sell bonds. | ||
| That's what you see in the bond revolt in the 10-year Treasury. | ||
| And the CCP is going to buy a ton of those. | ||
| The Gulf Emirates are going to buy a ton of those. | ||
| So they're going to have markers on us. | ||
| Your tax dollars are going to pay the interest on those bonds and that's what's funding the kinetic war machine. | ||
| They've already got an economic war machine. | ||
| They've got an information war machine. | ||
| Now they're building a massive kinetic war machine as our great admirals in the Western Pacific are telling us. | ||
| So 1.9 trillion today. | ||
| It's breathtaking. | ||
| I mean, Obama, the Tea Party started on $800 billion on Obama, and we went through a full meltdown. | ||
| I'll be honest, Jason, it's kind of crickets up here with the Republicans. | ||
| We're beating this one every day. | ||
| I'm saying, hey, look inside. | ||
| This is the most progressive, radical piece of legislation, socially. | ||
| I've ever seen, and it comes with money. | ||
| It's not like you pass some bill, like H.R. | ||
| 1, and then you've got to go back and fight in appropriations, you know, a dogfight up here to get it. | ||
| This is coming with cash money. | ||
| This is going to have massive implications also for the 2022 election. | ||
| Biden tomorrow night is going to be in the Oval on the one-year anniversary, as you so remember, because It was Jason Miller right here when we went into war and pandemic saying, hey, you're wartime president, be a wartime president. | ||
| President Trump's ratings were at the absolute highest. | ||
| Went in the Oval Office, addressed the nation and said, hey, we have a I'm calling a national emergency. | ||
| I'm stopping air traffic from from Europe and Milan. | ||
| Right. | ||
| We're going to I'm more than serious about this. | ||
| I started from trying to here's what we're going to do tomorrow. | ||
| Biden's going to sit there and he's going to try to take credit for all this. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And I tell you, he's going to wave off the joint. | ||
| He's not going to do a joint session at Congress. | ||
| He can't do a State of the Union. | ||
| He can't sit there. | ||
| The 50 percent of the American people now in the rest of us will know that something's going wrong. | ||
| Your assessment? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No, I think you're exactly right that Joe Biden is not going to go and do address to the joint session, because, quite frankly, if you saw yesterday when he went to visit that hardware store in D.C., it looked like a silver alert. | ||
| He's wandering around like a poor guy. | ||
| I tweeted this out, I was like, poor buddy just wants to go home and he doesn't recognize anyone. | ||
| He's just stammering around and you have Kamala Harris who's doing foreign leader calls. | ||
| Taking Norway the other night? | ||
| Taking Norway. | ||
| Here's the thing with Biden, so he can't, he just doesn't have the fortitude to go and deliver a State of the Union like joint session address. | ||
| So, Joe Biden will get out there, he will trumpet the success of this legislation passing, he'll talk about vaccines, how they're doing all these great things, and even the New York Times. | ||
| Sharon LaFreniere wrote a story this morning begrudgingly giving credit. | ||
| to President Trump for his work on Operation Warp Speed. | ||
| But Biden will get out there, try to declare victory, and then from the reports, I think they're going to go out and try to sell this. | ||
| I got to tell you, from the communications aspect, if I were Biden, I'd pass this thing and go back to the basement. | ||
| Why go out there and even do one or two events? | ||
| Because nobody wants to see it, and every time you do, you just diminish yourself. | ||
| Do you buy all the chatter now, if you read the left-wing media, is that they think that Obama didn't sell his 800 billion, and that's why he got plastered in the Great Tea Party Revolt of 2010. | ||
| And that's the specter they fear. | ||
| They fear a 2010 type 60 seats where there's been built a tsunami of to contest the Biden administration. | ||
| So quote-unquote he's got to go sell this. | ||
| It's interesting he didn't have to sell it before they jammed it through right? | ||
| I mean and one of the reasons I don't think there was enough counter Offense on this thing to actually get in people's grill and say, hey, this $1.9 trillion, somehow this has got to be paid for. | ||
| And it's, you know, it's $400 billion or $500 billion direct transfers. | ||
| I realize you've got a lot of other stuff, but this is principally A bailout of blue states, democratic policy, failed unions, the teachers union, all of it. | ||
| It's all their failures that they've got to check now. | ||
| They've got a checkbook and they're going to write it. | ||
| Well, it's real simple. | ||
| If we're on our side, if Congresswoman Boebert or Congressman Gates We're here just in the previous hour. | ||
| It's real simple. | ||
| If you go and take the $1.9 trillion and divide it by Americans who qualify for this, that'd be about $6,000 per adult. | ||
| But people are only getting $1,400 checks. | ||
| First of all, Biden said you get $2,000 checks. | ||
| It's actually $1,400. | ||
| But there's a difference between the $6,000 and the $1,400. | ||
| Who's getting the rest of it? | ||
| And that's the question we have to keep hitting on. | ||
| Because the fact of the matter is, it's going to every special interest. | ||
| It's going to, like you said, blue state bailouts. | ||
| It's not going to the people who actually need it. | ||
| You were comms director on the campaign strategies in 16. | ||
| You were you were comms director on the transition. | ||
| Biden has promised to do a press conference. | ||
| And people are thinking when they think press conference now, they think not Jack Kennedy. | ||
| They're thinking Donald Trump. | ||
| Bring it. | ||
| I'm walking in there. | ||
| Give me your best shot. | ||
| I'm calling the haters first, right? | ||
| I'm calling Jonathan Karl, Maggie Haberman. | ||
| They're getting the first pick. | ||
| I mean, he's just in there. | ||
| Give me your best shot. | ||
| Seeing Biden on the situation with the COVID bill the other day, he couldn't remember the Economist, he couldn't remember his head of the Pentagon, General Austin, couldn't remember the Pentagon, and then yesterday at the hardware store, even if he's able to go through 10 or 15 minutes or 20 minutes tomorrow night from the Oval on the glass, right? | ||
| On the teleprompter. | ||
| As a comms person, what are you fearing? | ||
| Because they've now committed by the end of March he will have a press conference. | ||
| Uh, what I'm fearing is actually, you know what? | ||
| I think he's much better. | ||
| He'll be he'll be fine in the national address when it's in front of the prompter. | ||
| It's a tight scripted environment. | ||
| He's fine. | ||
| They they will. | ||
| They'll make sure the weather the managing his nap schedule. | ||
| Or other different things. | ||
| They'll have it at a point where he's going to have some energy going. | ||
| He'll probably be fine in the press conference because the media is going to treat him with kid gloves. | ||
| They're going to go through and, you know, President Biden, what's it like to take over for this crisis at the border that your predecessor started? | ||
| Everything will be lay up central. | ||
| Now, here's the question. | ||
| Will, now we know literally every single question, it's mapped out who he's going to call on. | ||
| We know that, you know, when Biden says, wait, who am I supposed to call on next? | ||
| He's just expecting to be all teed up. | ||
| He will be it's much more fun to beat up on Biden for the lack of doing the press conference. | ||
| He'll actually do fine on it because the media is it's going to be softball city. | ||
| So you think you think the press conference will actually hold it. | ||
| They won't delay it and they'll actually do you think he will and I think he'll be fine. | ||
| Do you think he'll do a joint session? | ||
| I think they'll try to wave that on but he's got to go sell this to the country doesn't need to do something on Capitol Hill. | ||
| Boy, I don't know. | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| I say he doesn't. | ||
| I don't think he's going to stand up there for 40 minutes. | ||
| And that's why I don't think they're going to do a real national tour to go and sell this thing, because they kind of don't need to. | ||
| Let's pivot now to President Trump. | ||
| President Trump, you know, there's a part of the Trump coalition that's sitting there broken hearted, having a tough time getting over what happened and sitting there going, hey, you know, they're going to steal more elections. | ||
| I see H.R.1. | ||
| I see all these gutless guys in the Georgia, you know, the governor of Georgia and the And the Secretary of State in Arizona, you know, what am I to do? | ||
| Then you see others that are ready to fight, want to get on with it right now. | ||
| What do we got to do? | ||
| Tell us, you know, tell us if, you know, we got to start calling these congressmen, etc. | ||
| Where do you think the President is right now and particularly about focus on the here and now in 2022? | ||
| What's right in front of us? | ||
| Not 2024, but the program that we have to make sure that we hit all the marks on now. | ||
| Yeah, great question. | ||
| So we've started getting granular on the races that are coming up in 2022, going through the Senate races, both the open seats, the democratically controlled seats, paying attention to those. | ||
| We've gone through the House seats that are in play. | ||
| We've discussed House members who voted for impeachment. | ||
| We've also gone through the gubernatorial races, whether it's an open seat where we need to hold it and get a good person in like Arizona. | ||
| Whether it's a place where maybe we have a chance for an upgrade such as a Georgia. | ||
| Also, and this is critical, as we talk about these blue state governor races, whether it be Nevada where they have that clubhouse governor, Sisolak, Whitmer in Michigan, Evers in Wisconsin, it will have the open seat then there in Pennsylvania. | ||
| need to make sure we get Republicans into these gubernatorial seats for the simple fact that if we wouldn't have had a lot of the shenanigans from 2020 with rigging the election, if we had had Republican governors in there to put their foot down. | ||
| So it's critical. | ||
| So we've look, we're over, we have over 80 million in Save America, which is the leadership pack now. | ||
| Technically, it's a multi-candidate pack. | ||
| So we've set up a process and we're starting to field incoming on candidates who want to He's, look, the president's relaxing, he's having some fun, connecting with Mar-a-Lago members and people, just his pals he hasn't had a chance to spend a lot of time with. | ||
| But he is starting to drill down and he made it clear, hey, I'm going to be there for the Republican Party in the committees because I want to go and win this back. | ||
| But to be clear, no rhinos. | ||
| We're not helping rhinos. | ||
| We're going to help America First conservatives. | ||
| We're going to get the right conservative in each of these races. | ||
| I want to get back to that after the break. | ||
| We've already seen, particularly on the border, he's been out there, he's been putting up these statements from the president. | ||
| They've been pretty provocative and in your face about what the problems are about the tsunami coming. | ||
| So I want to make sure that, is that something we're going to continue to see where he's seeing issues that are close to his heart and close to the MAGA program? | ||
| He's going to be out in the front of that and not holding back at all? | ||
| Yeah, and one of the things that to let kind of take folks kind of inside, because this is a war room pandemic here, and these are the hardcore allies, we usually talk every morning, not quite as early as we did on the campaign trail, but you know, somewhere in like the, you know, 8, 9am range, kind of run through the news of the day, the stories, what's happening. | ||
| And I can always tell when he's kind of getting ready to do a windup, he's like, okay, here's what I want to say. | ||
| So I got to have like the laptop ready, because I got to start typing. | ||
| But he usually has this thought, and of course by the time I talk to him at eight or nine, he's seen every show, he's read every paper front to back, and he's on top of it. | ||
| He's going to be very engaged. | ||
| He's legitimately very concerned about what's happening with the border and immigration, concerned about what to do with HR1, with trying to rig these elections, and having a repeat in future 2022-2024. | ||
| He's a lot more engaged than I think people would realize. | ||
| We've got a lot to go through when we get back. | ||
| We're going to talk about the CCP. | ||
| We're also going to talk about the due diligence on these candidates and getting a full MAGA slate. | ||
| Take a short commercial break. | ||
| Back in a second. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| You know, Mike Lindell's been teasing about a new big social media platform that he's rolling out here in the next couple weeks. | ||
| He's saying he's going to make sure that people are uncancellable. | ||
| So I have to get the details of that when we get Mike back on here. | ||
| He's out, I think, in Arizona tonight. | ||
| He's one of the big people in back of this effort out there of the 2.1 million hand count of the total forensic audit done by a third party in Arizona, which Mark Fincham and the team, Liz Harrison, he's been working on from day one. | ||
| They're a sponsor of the War Room now, so make sure you go to MyPillow.com, use the promo code WARROOM, up to 66% discounts on many of the products, but you can go there. | ||
| I think it's 110 products. | ||
| You can go there, spend your time, support Mike Lindell, support MyPillow, support the War Room. | ||
| Go to promo code WARROOM and go there today. | ||
| Here's the thing, President Trump has endorsed people both in the House and the Senate that have turned out to be not just his worst critics, but actually worked against the MAGA program. | ||
| And this is one of the things I get from the audience all the time. | ||
| Is it going to be better due diligence? | ||
| Are you going to make sure the guys are actually with the MAGA program? | ||
| You got Mitt Romney, you got this guy Ben Sasse, and these guys are just not chipping away in back of the scenes. | ||
| They're actually, you know, in the president's grill all the time. | ||
| Mitch McConnell. | ||
| Guys are just not MAGA. | ||
| So is there a process now that President Trump understands that if he endorses these guys, His followers in his base say, OK, that guy's got to sign off. | ||
| But later on, when a Ben Sasse makes a living out of attacking him, and, you know, Sasse is talking about running for president. | ||
| I realize it's ridiculous, but he's going to use that, the anti-Trump element to get the media to all start. | ||
| You know, these guys have no real backing except for the Washington, D.C. | ||
| media right and Some people ask me all the time are we not going to have any more mit romney mistakes or ben sass how do you how? | ||
| Do you work with the president to make sure that that these are not just maga supporters in America first? | ||
| But they're also supporters of the president well and certainly there have been some duds in the past now keep in mind with the Romney And the sass those are essentially You know it teams ahead by three touchdowns And you're predicting that you know with ten seconds left in the game you're predicting They're gonna win so those were kind of at the end it wasn't as though he catapulted them or lifted them above. | ||
| But look, there have been some duds. | ||
| Even take John McCain. | ||
| He saved John McCain. | ||
| If he had not come in in 2016, and you were still with Cruz at the time, I was at Breitbart. | ||
| If he had not come in, and I know a lot of people were telling him, that he came in and saved John McCain at the end. | ||
| John McCain would not be in the U.S. | ||
| Senate if Trump was talked into saving John McCain. | ||
| I know that irked him. | ||
| That was under his skin a lot, and John McCain never really acknowledged that. | ||
| I've never acknowledged that he was saved by Trump. | ||
| There is a robust research and vetting process going on right now for anyone for these seats. | ||
| Look, whether it be the Ohio Senate, whether it be North Carolina Senate, whether it be these congressional races, because also too, so say for example, you know, Adam Kinzinger, Super Clown, who I referenced in the previous hour. | ||
| We want to make sure that we have one candidate who's going to be a solid candidate that goes up against them. | ||
| I think we might have an excellent one there now, but we're still going through and doing the research. | ||
| We want to make sure that we also go through and really kick the tires on the policy positions. | ||
| What's their stance on ending these forever wars? | ||
| What is their stance on trade? | ||
| What is their stance on ending illegal immigration and securing the border? | ||
| We're actually going through, and so it's not just that they're the conservative candidate, but they're the America first conservative candidate. | ||
| So we get that populist angle. | ||
| So we're asking those very detailed specific questions. | ||
| We want to hear in their words, where do they stand? | ||
| And we'll have that and so we'll have that very much on the record. | ||
| So it's going to be it's going to be more and obviously the president ultimately will be the one who does it but other I think people will be happy to hear. | ||
| Don jr. | ||
| is also very involved in that operation so kind of the other people are helping the president with this he's the most prominent and people have their their pulse on their hand on the pulse what's going on Liz Cheney you know Gates went out there I think I heard a CMP speech was pretty pretty over-the-top and great but we still can't get a recording of that his speech out in Cheyenne Against Liz Cheney was extraordinary, right? | ||
| Fire-breathing populist goes out there. | ||
| How do you continue to try to have, you know, McCarthy's flying down there, he's going down to try to, you know, butter up the president and to get the president fully engaged in 2022, which is obviously a priority, taking back the House. | ||
| And people say, well McCarthy did such a great job. | ||
| McCarthy was able to maybe select some people. | ||
| Donald Trump put those members on his shoulders and got them across the goal line. | ||
| Just like he got in 16. | ||
| McConnell wouldn't have the job if he didn't pull Blunt, Johnson, Toomey, and Burr all across the goal line at the last second. | ||
| And Toomey maybe slightly debatable. | ||
| The rest of them absolutely were dead in the water. | ||
| He dragged them across the goal line, right? | ||
| To take the Senate and give Mitch the job that he always wanted, right? | ||
| How do you, with McCarthy? | ||
| How can you still have Liz Cheney in leadership and have these situations? | ||
| It's emboldened her. | ||
| It's made her more arrogant. | ||
| Where she hasn't been back to Wyoming. | ||
| She's doing a huge fundraiser in Gucci Gulch over here with Paul Ryan. | ||
| It's all contractors. | ||
| You've seen the invitation, right? | ||
| She's doing it in defiance and McCarthy sits up there and lets her take cheap shots because the media is going to play it up all the time. | ||
| There is no civil war in the Republican Party and here's why. | ||
| The Trump movement is the Republican Party now. | ||
| It's the votes, it's the energy, it's people going door-to-door, it's the people with the money. | ||
| How can we be in a situation where McCarthy allows her to be in leadership and you don't have one of these other Trump-oriented firebrands that step up there and become part of leadership? | ||
| I think this is what people are saying, what's going on. | ||
| I realize the President is very understanding of what McCarthy's got to do, but how do you just cut to the chase and say she's got to go? | ||
| I don't see if she pops off again and she's not removed from that position, we're going to have serious problems heading into the midterms. | ||
| I think it's already on untenable ground that she could even be in that position. | ||
| How can you have someone there who doesn't speak for the conference, who is out there actively working against President Trump? | ||
| That's not where the conference is. | ||
| And I wish the conference vote had gone differently. | ||
| I think there are some shenanigans in that room, some arm twisting and some people advocating things. | ||
| Because they got the anonymous vote, and that's what they used it for, right? | ||
| The headcount was a lot different before they passed that. | ||
| Why does Stefanik not have that job? | ||
| Why are they not calling another vote? | ||
| Why are we not working the phones and saying, hey, McCarthy, when you get back in town, maybe we ought to schedule another vote and have Lisa Stefanik, have Congressman Stefanik, even Lee Zeldin, but I think Stefanik would be the type of firebranding you would be perfect At least Stefanik would be great in that position. | ||
| She's also a good communicator, has a good team with her. | ||
| But the fact that Liz Cheney is out there campaigning against the President is ridiculous. | ||
| I don't see how she can remain in that position. | ||
| And here's the thing, when they have that fundraiser, that's all the swamp, that's what Trump ran against. | ||
| Those are the ones that hate him the most. | ||
| Behind the scenes in the cocktail parties, they're the ones that hate all of his programs. | ||
| Not in the room, not in the deal. | ||
| Donald Trump, the single biggest thing he did to stop the managed decline of the country by these elites, is gave the deplorables, the MAGA movement, the silent majority in this country, he not just put them in the room, he put them in the room With a guy who, when he's in the room, is going to bench press you, right? | ||
| And that's what the power of this was. | ||
| And to have somebody just working against him is just absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| Now, I've got to go to this RNC. | ||
| I don't understand this RNC thing. | ||
| This is a guy who knows about brands, right? | ||
| Knows about building brands. | ||
| Knows about how you take brands to the next level. | ||
| You've got his brain, you've got the things you guys are working on, and it's got some money in it, and you're going to raise some more money to do the work of the President and the things he's going to do. | ||
| Then you've got the RNC doing their thing. | ||
| But then he says, hey, they come out and the guy, I think it's Stemmer, the guy in Minnesota, the Congressman, who's head of, I think, the House. | ||
| Tom Emmers. | ||
| Tom Emmers. | ||
| And he says, no, we're going to back, you know, all ten guys. | ||
| That's not going to work. | ||
| Did they not get the memo? | ||
| That's just not part of the program. | ||
| Those 10 will not be back in Congress, right? | ||
| That's just not going to happen. | ||
| That's just that arrogance of then using President Trump's image and likeness, etc. | ||
| And the guy that sent the letter, Wasn't Justin is a Remus? | ||
| I thought he was terminated during the, he was terminated between November 3rd and January 20th. | ||
| He was terminated because they had to have an interim counsel because he wasn't a team player on the efforts that were trying to be made by people all over the country to try to get to the bottom of the voter fraud. | ||
| He was terminated. | ||
| How is he the guy signing, and why are they not doing this with a phone call behind the scenes? | ||
| Why are they sending a letter or putting a letter out To the President of the United States, I don't understand any of this. | ||
| Well, I think we have it largely resolved now to where President Trump has said very clearly he's supporting the Republican Party. | ||
| He's on board, made that clear at CPAC, not taking off or not doing a third party. | ||
| He is the Republican Party. | ||
| He is the Republican Party. | ||
| Supports the work of the committees. | ||
| The committees go and make sure we get the majorities and go and win things back. | ||
| But very clearly, you are not to use his likeness or image without permission. | ||
| And also, he wants to make sure no rhinos and any of the money that he's raising, anything he's doing, isn't going to help rhinos or picking bad candidates. | ||
| He is, I think it's probably an understatement to say, pretty fired up about this and wants to make sure... Oh, I can imagine. | ||
| Well, we saw the statement about Karl Rove. | ||
| We're Carl the Rhino, where he hit Carl pretty good. | ||
| That was just an absolute humdinger. | ||
| That was a classic. | ||
| That was a classic. | ||
| One of my favorite lines was, Hey Carl, I hear that the Lincoln Project has some board openings. | ||
| Maybe you'd fit in better over there. | ||
| It was brutal at so many levels. | ||
| It was so good. | ||
| But look, President Trump is When you say support the committees, if the committee sits there and says, hey, we're backing these 10 guys, that's an unbridgeable gap, right? | ||
| In the moment when it counted, these guys, and a lot of it was grandstanding, right? | ||
| A lot of it was grandstanding. | ||
| If Emerson and these guys still support it, how can you support the committee? | ||
| Look, when it comes to Tom Emmer, Chairman Emmer, I'm fine with that comment because he kind of is forced to go and say something like that. | ||
| Where the rubber will hit the road is, say for example, President Trump has endorsed Max Miller in the race, former White House campaign staffer, against Anthony Gonzalez. | ||
| Let's just put it this way. | ||
| If the NRCC or committee were to come in really strong to attack Max or to come in there, number one, that's going to get President Trump involved in a huge way, but I think it's probably safe to say that any cooperation or working with such entity in the future is probably done. | ||
| So that's where they might be able to go out and do a little bit of lip service because they kind of have to because that's in the bylaws and you don't want to go and make a whole conversation about bylaws. | ||
| But if President Trump endorses someone to race and when the committee starts it starts attacking them, there's gonna be big problems. | ||
| Rahim, jumping in here, you told me a long time ago That the Lincoln Project was a total scam, and just a fundraising, and it was just a complete scam to make those guys wealthy, right? | ||
| And do some spots, right? | ||
| What's your assessment of where it stands today? | ||
| Do you think it's actually been crushed enough by liberals and people on the left that supported it? | ||
| No, I think that we still need to go and absolutely drive them out of existence. | ||
| I mean, it's still technically open. | ||
| You might have George Conway and a couple people saying that they need to go into, you know, Kurt Bardella say they need to go and shut it down. | ||
| But the fact of the matter is, I mean, they view this. | ||
| This has always been a big for-profit entity. | ||
| And even put aside the absolute horrific stuff that John Weaver is doing. | ||
| And I mean, just to make sure that people understand just how sick this is. | ||
| Literally, he's texting a 14 year old boy For sexual relations. | ||
| First of all, how's that guy not in jail? | ||
| How's that minor's parents not taking a weaver to the authorities? | ||
| But everything with those guys is a scam. | ||
| This isn't because they're some hardcore ideologues. | ||
| It's because they're grifters and they have no revenue stream. | ||
| They couldn't fit in in regular campaigns in American politics, so they went and set up some scam, some absolute scheme. | ||
| So karma's a you-know-what, Steve. | ||
| I think they're starting to get a little bit of a reminder of that. | ||
| We still have a ways to go. | ||
| The timing of it after November 3rd is interesting, right? | ||
| Do you honestly think that some of this was not known earlier in the process? | ||
| Well, I knew. | ||
| I was tweeting about it. | ||
| Lots of people knew. | ||
| I mean, this was an open secret in Washington, D.C. | ||
| The problem was getting people to go on the record and getting a reporter who would bother to write it. | ||
| And, of course, every reporter suddenly got the cojones after November 3rd. | ||
| And the editors and the papers suddenly wanted to talk about this. | ||
| Yeah, because they viewed the Lincoln Project, they were effectively pack meals for him. | ||
| And, hey, let's go and help get this Trump hatred across the desert and then shoot the pack meals on the other side. | ||
| Why are we beating around the bush? | ||
| The media covered for a paedophile to get a man out of office. | ||
| That's what happened. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| When we return, we'll get Jason Miller for the day in the War Room. | ||
| We'll take a short commercial break. | ||
| We'll return with Jason's wit and wisdom in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Okay, you're in the War Room. | ||
| We need you to go to warroomdefense.com to get your War Room Defense Pack. | ||
| That's what you need to build up your immune system. | ||
| We've got a partner now. | ||
| We're white labeling this. | ||
| We've got Vitamin D3 and also Zinc. | ||
| You can take every day as part of the pack, but make sure you go there to get all the information. | ||
| If you're going to be a Patriot Warrior, You've got to be a health warrior, and that's why we need you to go to today, warroomdefense.com. | ||
| Make sure you go. | ||
| By the way, it's been an overwhelming response when everybody go there. | ||
| Raheem, somebody said today, this is not the, in 1776, this was not Thomas Paine's Common Sense, was it? | ||
| That was in January? | ||
| That was January the 10th. | ||
| January the 10th. | ||
| But we had Common Sense, Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith. | ||
| The Declaration of Independence and also Volume 1 of Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. | ||
| Pretty good year, 1776. | ||
| I'd have to say we probably... I think it's not evolution, it's devolving from there. | ||
| I want to go to the greatest existential threat we have. | ||
| Jump in. | ||
| Well, it's really interesting. | ||
| Obviously, we'll have to have a much longer conversation about this. | ||
| By the way, Steve, some of the conversations we have offline I think people would want us to have on the air as well about all of this. | ||
| But there is something very serious to be said about where real liberals, where old-fashioned liberals find themselves now. | ||
| Well, not even just the classical liberals, but where old-fashioned liberalism finds itself now. | ||
| Because remember, I mean, all of those things you just mentioned were pretty liberal, small-L liberal texts. | ||
| In the Enlightenment, big time. | ||
| Right? | ||
| But let's be clear about this. | ||
| The Enlightenment has turned very, very dark indeed. | ||
| And liberalism is now for almost everything against what the Enlightenment thinkers wanted. | ||
| And that's a really interesting conversation to be had out in long form. | ||
| Speaking of Enlightened thinkers, Rahim, are you going to start subscribing to Teen Vogue now that Alexi McCammon has left Axios to go over there? | ||
| I thought she was not getting the job after all her... what was it? | ||
| Did she do some racist tweets or something? | ||
| Yeah, pretty hardcore anti-Asian-American racist tweets. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| No, I won't be subscribing. | ||
| In fact, I've cancelled my subscription. | ||
| Ah, okay. | ||
| Speaking of Asia, the great existential threat is not from Lao-Beijing. | ||
| It's the people, the great people of China are suppressed by and oppressed by one of the biggest transnational criminal organizations around, the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Donald J. Trump, really for the first time in history, stood up and said, hey, these are bad guys, right? | ||
| They're oppressing the Chinese people. | ||
| They're in cahoots with the worst people in the world. | ||
| They're trying to, you know, consolidate the Eurasian landmass. | ||
| And they're an existential threat to us in every level. | ||
| And I'm going to confront them. | ||
| We're not going to compete them. | ||
| We're going to confront them. | ||
| And we're going to do it through trade and bringing manufacturing jobs back. | ||
| The Biden administration, your assessment, Jason, you've been there from the beginning on this one, your assessment, they're going to Alaska, right, this weekend. | ||
| So talk to us about how Biden rates, coming off the Trump, really changing something, the most fundamental thing in our foreign policy in the last 30-40 years. | ||
| And the unwinding we're seeing going on right now. | ||
| So I don't think the teachers have returned the papers yet, but I think Biden's cruising for a big fat F. So this is, you know, this morning... That harsh enough? | ||
| Oh, so this morning I wake up and I'm looking through all my, you know, I was going to be joining you, so I had to be read up on everything and I go to the FT. | ||
| Financial Times, right? | ||
| And literally the top story is that the US and China are going to meet up in Anchorage, Alaska this weekend. | ||
| So it's Tony Blinken and Wang Yi, the foreign minister for China, who are going to get together. | ||
| And literally they have a paragraph in there that the Biden administration wanted to meet there at a midpoint, effectively, because that would show being deferential to the Chinese. | ||
| This immediately just put me into orbit. | ||
| We hold all of the cards. | ||
| We hold all of them. | ||
| And already, this is what Donald Trump campaigned in 2015, 2016, said, you idiot politicians from both parties who have ruined our foreign policy, both security-wise and trade-wise, over the last several decades. | ||
| You go and negotiate and give everything away. | ||
| Joe Biden hasn't even had a meeting yet and he's already capitulating and saying, oh, we're going to move it halfway to you to make sure that we show that we can play nice. | ||
| Rahim, remember, geniusly found the clip of Biden saying of Xi Jinping that he had spent more time with him. | ||
| One-on-one time than any other American in the entire blanking country. | ||
| So the fact that they've already caved, hey, we're going to go to Anchorage. | ||
| Tony Blinken, I'll go to Anchorage because that way I'll be closer for you. | ||
| We can show that Americans aren't trying to one-up you. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Is this America first or America last? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Joe Biden, I think you just played yourself. | |
| Just real quick, number one, thank you for that, but it was Jack Maxey who found the clip, so credit to him. | ||
| Secondly, Mike McCormick actually tells us, and he's written more articles that I'm hurriedly editing through for the National Post, tells us that that claim was a low-end, a very, very low-end estimate of the number of hours that Biden has spent privately, non-documented meetings with Xi Jinping. | ||
| The lead story on CNN the other day was an independent group has now come out. | ||
| Mike Pompeo said the Trump administration designated them as a genocidal regime against the Uyghurs. | ||
| I say it should be brought out to more, but to the Uyghurs. | ||
| An independent panel came out yesterday. | ||
| Even CNN had to lead with it. | ||
| How are they even agreeing to a meeting? | ||
| Before Beijing starts to address or at least allows the Security Council of the United Nations to have a meeting and addresses they can't block. | ||
| Why would you agree to a meeting, a sit-down in Anchorage or anywhere before we start to get to the bottom of what's going on with the Uyghurs? | ||
| This is why it matters when we talk about the foreign cash and the Biden's being bought and paid for. | ||
| We followed the money back in the campaign. | ||
| Everyone wanted to cover up the Tony Bobulinski scandal. | ||
| We know that upwards of a sixth of all Biden voters would have reconsidered their vote for Biden if they'd known about the scandal beforehand that the media sat on. | ||
| They squashed it completely. | ||
| And Steve, it gets even worse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, we have the the U.S. | |
| leader of PACCOM, our PACCOM commander, testifying in front of Congress yesterday saying, I'm reading this from the CNN. | ||
| Don't worry, folks, I go to it so you don't have to. | ||
| China is assembling an increasingly offensive military and expanding its regional footprint as Beijing steps up efforts to supplant the U.S. | ||
|
unidentified
|
military. | |
| The senior admiral, head of the Pacific Command, all the Pacific, he's given a warning, a plea for the military, and you, the taxpayer out there right now, are fully financing their military with the interest you're paying on our national debt on the bonds And even worse, there's an article in South China Morning Post this morning that China officials are playing up the rise of the East and decline of the West ahead of the CCP's centenary in July, kind of their annual confab. | ||
| They're literally hyping it up. | ||
| We're on the rise, U.S. | ||
| and the West are on the decline. | ||
| And Joe Biden, but you know what? | ||
| Can we please come to Anchorage? | ||
| And would you guys like a foot rub? | ||
| Can we get you a Mike Lindell MyPillow? | ||
| Or would you like a different pillow? | ||
| People are so excited about you being back here. | ||
| How do people follow you during the day? | ||
| On Twitter at Jason Miller in DC usually have some decently spicy content So at Jason Miller in DC sometimes speaking on behalf of the president sometimes just my own commentary Okay, fine, and you're working with the president every day, but three o'clock. | ||
| What's happening in the podcast? | ||
| I've got Brooke Goldstein on the podcast today. | ||
| We're going to be talking about more of the Twitter stuff, the banning and all of that that's going on right now, the anti-semitism that they allow still to dominate the platform. | ||
| But let me tell you something. | ||
| Check out the National Post lead story right now. | ||
| It answers your question about this Anchorage thing. | ||
| Okay, we're going to have... Maggie's going to be back in and continue the discussion yesterday. | ||
| Also a lot more on the fraud and also from the border. | ||
| All of it today at 5 o'clock. |
Export Selection