Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
So you don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens, War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
This is not an option. | ||
This is a crackpot idea, advanced by a crackpot in Congress. | ||
And one of the things that has been exposed by this situation is how many crackpots there are in the Republican Party, including the Republican Party in Congress. | ||
Remember that lawsuit that was filed by the state of Texas that was a lunatic claim, trying to influence the election results in other swing states. | ||
And now this notion that the Vice President can decree different electoral votes. | ||
Wow, maybe Al Gore could have thought of that in 2000 when he had to, or early 2001 when he had to read the results or Uh, making George W. Bush the president, or maybe Richard Nixon in early 1961. | ||
If he had just been devious enough, he could have come up with a way to flip the electoral college votes away from John F. Kennedy. | ||
No! | ||
He does not have the power to do that. | ||
But, you know, it is a bottomless pit of nuttery that the Republican Party, or individual members of the Republican Party, are going to pursue 17 snake handlers out of the Pennsylvania House. | ||
Just 17 of them. | ||
Not one state senator, not even the state party owns this. | ||
Some random House members sent out this ridiculous, you know, like, simp tribute to the President. | ||
unidentified
|
And, of course, the President would retreat anything that he tries to cast out on the election. | |
There is zero fraud in Pennsylvania, save for these three cases. | ||
Seventeen snake handlers and a bottomless pit of nuttery, so says John Harwood and so says the Lieutenant Governor. | ||
That is the Lieutenant Governor, by the way, of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. | ||
That's not the High Priest of the Satanic Church, although they may have certain characteristics you might think are similar. | ||
We had to say, that was part of our morning cold open. | ||
We had to do it again. | ||
Because we've got a jam show here in the evening or evening broadcast to get you up to date on everything that's going on. | ||
One of the big things is Rudy Giuliani, the mayor, is going to go to Atlanta tomorrow and they're going to have a committee hearing. | ||
He's going to testify tomorrow before the Senate. | ||
Part of the reason here is to build still the center of gravity is the state legislatures. | ||
However, obviously people are building a case for next Wednesday for the 6th of January for both the members of Congress, the House, the Senate, and the President of the Senate. | ||
That would be the Vice President of the United States. | ||
This report that has been teased over the last 24 hours, it actually came from John Lott. | ||
And people out there that know the Second Amendment know that John Lott is the great researcher from Yale and UCLA, University of Chicago, a collection of Ivy and Ivy equivalent institutions that I think all banned him because his books were so powerful. | ||
First off, More Guns, Less Crime, just the very title of it made people's heads blow when it first came out. | ||
A seminal work, and John Lattice had more impact On public policy, guess what? | ||
Because of his research. | ||
John Lott's ability as an economist, his ability to understand math and apply that to situations. | ||
He's now written a report, he's an employee of the Department of Justice, and we have on Peter Navarro. | ||
And the reason this is so timely Remember, as we keep saying, more and more information is coming out every day that's just going to bury Joe Biden, right, on his illegality and illegitimacy, regardless, YouTube, of whether we had the safe harbor or whether we had the Electoral College. | ||
Remember, you guys are all worked up about that. | ||
We're hurtling towards a situation next week where it's going to be a throwdown of all these different aspects of it. | ||
And John Lott, The very famous economist that did all the, through every gun owner out there, and quite frankly, every minority in minority communities that have been crime infested. | ||
John Lotz books his analysis, More Guns, Less Crime, and others. | ||
uh... have just been seminal works he has done this analysis in particular is focused on uh... when the big areas you focus on was fulton county georgia and i want to bring on the assistant to the president peter navarro you have seen this report beforehand this is now out a john lott is uh... is temporarily i guess been working on the department of justice walk us through Because you're an economist like John Lott is. | ||
Walk us through what John Lott did, why his approach is a little different than yours, and what he came up with. | ||
Sure, Steve. | ||
The top line here is that what Lott did was statistically demonstrate that there are likely to be enough illegal votes in the cesspool known as Georgia to give the election back To Donald Trump, and he did a similar thing for Pennsylvania. | ||
Now, solid econometrics, I think you referenced well his pedigree. | ||
I mean, you don't spend time at Yale and the University of Chicago and Stanford if you're a dummy and you don't have chops. | ||
This gentleman, he's the real deal. | ||
He got run out of town in this doxing-cancel culture because he did some interesting research that basically proved the old axiom that an armed society is a polite society. | ||
So that's kind of the background. | ||
This guy is a very credible academic. | ||
Now, he did two types of analyses, Steve. | ||
One is that he compared in Fulton County, he looked at the precincts in Fulton County where there were allegations of fraud and compared what happened in terms of vote count there versus for Trump in the ones that had no fraud. | ||
They were like next door, right? | ||
You would think the premise here statistically is that there should be no difference between what you observe in those two cohorts unless fraud was present. | ||
And guess what? | ||
There was a pretty significant difference statistically. | ||
There was a statistically significant difference. | ||
And it amounts to about 80% of the Biden alleged victory margin. | ||
That alone. | ||
That alone, right? | ||
The other thing he did, again this was very clever, as an academic you admire these kind of things when you have a methodology that teases out something. | ||
And this was the excess voter problem. | ||
This is the issue of For example, you have a precinct where there's higher than a hundred percent turnout. | ||
Can't have that unless they're same-day voting, right? | ||
Okay, so what he did was he figured out a way, econometrically, to tease... Hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it. | ||
You mean say, hang on, hang on, I want to make sure you get terminology right for our audience. | ||
Same-day registration. | ||
There's always same-day voting, but you're saying the only way you could do that is the same-day registration, right? | ||
Yes, yes, yes. | ||
Keep going. | ||
More precise, Mr. Bannon. | ||
I've corrected you enough over at the White House, I know, in the campaign, I don't have to disguise it. | ||
Okay, deplorable. | ||
Bannon left me, after six months there, to toil in the vineyards there, alone. | ||
unidentified
|
Another story, we'll talk about it another time. | |
Alright, so here's the thing. | ||
Rudy, Rudy, I hope you'll take this study in his briefcase along with all the other stuff he has down to the cesspool of Georgia, because the cesspool of Georgia really needs to get clean here. | ||
They need to postpone their election, because here's what John Lott found. | ||
He found that across the six battleground states, there are likely to be as many Up to almost 300,000 excess voters. | ||
Now, how would you account for that through fraud? | ||
That would be the dead voters. | ||
These are the receipts, right? | ||
For example, in the filing that was made with respect to Georgia, they talked about the thousands of dead voters, ghost voters, out-of-state voters, too young to vote voters and all of that stuff. | ||
So he has very credible evidence there. | ||
That there's significant excess voters, ergo fraudulent voters, voting across these six battleground states. | ||
The other thing, there's a couple of things that caught my eye in the paper that I think are quite interesting. | ||
I didn't know this, but 74% of the countries in Europe ban absentee voting altogether for anybody who's actually living in-country, right? | ||
And the ones that do allow it have very, very stringent rules. | ||
They limit it to things like if you're in the military or in the hospital. | ||
You can compare that, for example, to this indefinitely confined situation in Wisconsin where you had people skiing on the slopes of Aspen and riding their bikes who were supposed to be indefinitely confined. | ||
And then the other thing that I found extremely interesting, Steve, While Republican counties experienced a huge turnout in 2020, Democrat counties did not accept, except for those with alleged fraud. | ||
Okay, so I get back to the finding of my report. | ||
You know, the basic, the Immaculate Deception report is the strategy is to, for the Democrat Party, to stuff the ballot box With absentee and mail-in ballots by any means necessary, including bending and sometimes breaking the law. | ||
And in the second volume of that report I'm working on, what I'm going to show is the sophistication of the strategy is a two-parter, where part one is to expand the universe, the number of actual ballots that come in, and then the second part Is to make sure that there's a much lower number of them rejected. | ||
So you get, like, proportionally more flood of these fraudulent ballots coming in at the same time that you strip away the safeguards, like signature match, that would pick up the fraud. | ||
So this is a scurrilous, but well-organized, years-long effort by the part of the Democrat Party And enablers like Soros and Zuckerberg to basically steal a selection. | ||
And Rudy's mission tomorrow can't be more important. | ||
Georgia, Raffensperg, Ducey in Arizona, these folks got to stand up for their country, their country, this president, and the people who actually put them in office. | ||
This stuff is gold. | ||
You can get this paper. | ||
It should be on The War Room. | ||
I've got a tweet on it on Real P. Navarro. | ||
And let's get it out there, because it required reading. | ||
Let's put it up in the livestream. | ||
We've got it up. | ||
We tweeted it out. | ||
Jackson tweeted it out again. | ||
This is a must-read. | ||
John Lott. | ||
He's kind of the legendary author of so much of the statistical analysis that has backed up the gun laws or the freedom of the Second Amendment in this country. | ||
A lot has been at the forefront of that. | ||
That's why he's been attacked viciously by the left, but he's somebody that you can't question. | ||
Peter, we've got about a minute. | ||
Can you punch, and maybe we'll keep you over the break for a second, but the first question I would always ask you when something would come in, I would say, look, I see the argument. | ||
Punch a hole in it. | ||
Is there a weakness you see from what Lott is presenting? | ||
And if it is, what would you say it is? | ||
What's the weakest element of his argument? | ||
This is clean and clinical good research, okay? | ||
What the left's going to say is, well, there's still no smoking gun, it's just numbers. | ||
That's what they'll say. | ||
But, look, court cases ...have been settled for millions of dollars for less impressive statistical work than this. | ||
So, you know, let's have the debate. | ||
See, I think your show is dedicated to the proposition, let's have the debate, let's have the investigation, let's stop the smoke and mirrors, let's get down to the needy and the gritty. | ||
This kind of research is exactly why we have to have a... Peter, hang on for a minute. | ||
Peter, hang on for one second. | ||
I just want to keep you over the break. | ||
I've got another question or two to ask you. | ||
We've also got your Barstow Epstein with breaking news from Wisconsin. | ||
When Peter talked about the different verticals here, we talked about the indefinitely confined. | ||
We've got breaking news on that. | ||
Peter Navarro will join us, the assistant to the president, right after a short commercial break. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Let's consider some of the abuses of the democratic process in the state of Wisconsin. | ||
In the most blue counties in that state, Milwaukee and Dane counties, election officials aggressively encouraged voters there to declare that they were quote, indefinitely confined. | ||
Now, that status is meant for people who are literally shut-ins. | ||
People who are, for example, long-term, hospitalized, or ill and cannot get to the DMV to get updated driver's licenses or other forms of identification. | ||
Because of that, they can submit ballots by mail, Without any form of ID at all. | ||
Now, what happened? | ||
In the previous election, 70,000 people in Wisconsin were indefinitely confined. | ||
That number soared in this election of 2020 to over 200,000 voters. | ||
Well over 100,000 new indefinitely confined voters. | ||
Voters, we know that's not the on-the-ground reality. | ||
We know that this statute, this generosity was being manipulated and exploited by the Democrats. | ||
Keep this in mind. | ||
In Wisconsin, Biden's alleged victory margin in total for the state is only 20,000 votes. | ||
Wisconsin's vote is tainted and cannot possibly be certified on January 6th. | ||
That's the great Steve Cortez. | ||
We're going to get into this deeper with breaking news that Boris Epstein has. | ||
I want to just finish up with Peter Navarro. | ||
Peter, you mentioned the indefinitely confined. | ||
Boris has got some news on that. | ||
But, you know, I want to give a hat tip to everybody who's out there. | ||
You've got all of these people riding to the sound of the guns, doing research, putting up evidence, all of that. | ||
Peter, Rudy is going to be fully briefed on this tomorrow. | ||
And honestly, I think John Lott ought to actually testify, but Rudy in this testimony will be fully briefed on this. | ||
To know this to the fifth decimal place. | ||
Where do you think, Peter, since you said, hey, Lott did a great job here, this is clean from a social science point of view, from econometrics, he kind of nailed it. | ||
Where do you think this puts us? | ||
Your study is going to be out in a couple of days that shows that this was a well thought through plan. | ||
We're about a week away to game day. | ||
So, where do you think we stand right now? | ||
If you look at Georgia, it's one of the thinnest margins, right? | ||
Arizona and Georgia, it's like 12,000 votes. | ||
It's like nothing. | ||
And the amount of potential illegal votes dwarf those numbers. | ||
I think what John Lott's paper does is push us over the top in terms of proving, particularly in Fulton County, he calls it the Fulton County effect. | ||
Uh, that that's where this was stolen. | ||
It was stolen. | ||
And for, for Kemp, Rappensburg, and, or the state legislature itself to turn a blind eye now in the face of this. | ||
This is the closer. | ||
This, this is, this is the river card. | ||
The river card came and, and Trump's holding a straight flush in Georgia in terms of proving his case. | ||
Peter Navarro, we noticed you picked up like 10 or 12,000 Twitter followers since you've been on The Big Program. | ||
How did people get access to you during the day? | ||
Real P. Navarro, Twitter account. | ||
Just go for it. | ||
I try to just put stuff up there that matters and is useful to the mission, and you know what the mission is. | ||
Make America great again, and let's get President Trump a second term. | ||
The Immaculate Deception author, Peter Navarro. | ||
Thank you very much, Dr. Navarro. | ||
Take care, Steve. | ||
You're a patriot, sir. | ||
Thank you, brother. | ||
Thank you, Citizen Navarro. | ||
I'm bringing now Boris Epstein. | ||
Boris, you've got breaking news on Wisconsin. | ||
I want to get to that, because this flows through what Lot's talking about. | ||
It flows through what Peter Navarro's talking about. | ||
I want to step back for one second. | ||
This, ladies and gentlemen, every day additional information is going to come out. | ||
More details, more granularity about this deal. | ||
This is a wound, and the media's got to listen to this, and the oligarchs, the tech oligarchs, the American people are not going to settle for this. | ||
With all the suppression information you've done and all the suppression by the mainstream media saying this is baseless, this is fraudulent, these are just cranks, it's a bottomless pit of nuttery, it is, you know, snake handlers. | ||
The evidence here is compelling and it's getting more compelling every day. | ||
This is a wound that will not heal. | ||
And Joe Biden and these guys have never stopped up and never tried to refute any of this. | ||
This is why it's so essential to get venues like Rudy's going to be at tomorrow. | ||
The mayor's going to be in Georgia presenting before the state Senate in Georgia. | ||
And now he's got the John Lott. | ||
So, Boris, before we get to Wisconsin, why, in your mind, why have the Democrats not tried to come out and refute any of the information, any of the evidence that's been put forward? | ||
Steve, good to be with you as always. | ||
The reason that they're not coming out and revealing the information is because they can't. | ||
They can't. | ||
This has been a country-wide steal, a country-wide operation by the left to defraud the American public and to steal this election from President Trump, but more importantly, from the American voters. | ||
That is what the Democrats, that is what the left have done. | ||
That is what they have perpetrated against the American people, and they're being called out on it. | ||
They're being called out across the country, from Georgia to Wisconsin, from Pennsylvania to Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona. | ||
They've been called out across the country. | ||
And there's nothing the Democrats can say but just hark back to the disgusting lies in the media, right? | ||
Because we know it's a dirty circle, effectively, right? | ||
Democrats lie, the media perpetuates those lies, and then the Democrats cite the media's lies as evidence that they're somehow not lying. | ||
That is what it is. | ||
It's the ill-virtuous circle that is going on. | ||
We know about the collusion between the Dems, the left, and the media, and that's what you're seeing here. | ||
Even in the statement in Pennsylvania about the over 200,000 vote discrepancy between those who voted and those who supposedly cast their ballots. | ||
Right? | ||
Which is totally incomprehensible. | ||
How do you have a 200,000 vote difference? | ||
But what do you have the Secretary of State say? | ||
She's again going back to, well, the media has stated that all these are lies. | ||
Well, instead of referencing the media, how about some numbers? | ||
Republicans are coming with receipts, but the Democrats in the media, all they can say is to call these conspiracy theories, talk about some nonsense. | ||
Here's what they can't hide, and this is going to get every day. | ||
He just gave another talk at, guess what, 3.45 in the afternoon, or 3.30 in the afternoon, gave his daily talk. | ||
The reason is, before sundown, or before he's got to take his nap, but also so he doesn't go up in primetime, and even on the cable, and doesn't draw an audience. | ||
When he draws nothing, that exposes the lie. | ||
It's the inauguration, they're not going to have anybody there, because it exposes the lie, he can't draw a crowd. | ||
The Gallup poll just did the most admired man in America. | ||
Donald Trump wins, who's he in a horse race with? | ||
Barack Obama. | ||
Joe Biden's at 6%. | ||
They can't hide the fact that nobody cares about this guy, and you expect people to believe he actually got 84 million votes, and all these surged up in these battleground states where he had to win, where in New York and in Los Angeles, all these other places throughout the country, there was no change, right? | ||
Or Trump did better, and we carried everywhere else, from the state legislatures to the House to the Senate, that the They honestly expect us to sit down and just shut up and say, fine, I'll go to the inauguration. | ||
I'm going to watch it. | ||
No, it is not going to happen. | ||
Trump will never concede. | ||
He will never be at the inauguration. | ||
This is a wound that will not heal. | ||
And it's your, it's your sedition. | ||
Right? | ||
It's your coup. | ||
It's not Trump. | ||
Hey, we're going back to the math. | ||
Refute the math or bring the country together by going to the math. | ||
And let's go now to this new outrage. | ||
And here's what's so brave about Wisconsin. | ||
The Wisconsin guy's hair is not on fire. | ||
And you've got establishment guys out there like Reince Priebus to kind of run this program. | ||
Right? | ||
He's not a fire-breathing populist. | ||
Reince Priebus is a solid guy. | ||
Solid Republican. | ||
One of those solid, you know, Wisconsin guys. | ||
Well, I've got two things for your viewers and your listeners. | ||
Two things. | ||
and Spindle would not back down the committee hearings, they wouldn't change the rules, they wouldn't let the rules be changed. | ||
And now you got the receipts. | ||
Boris, tell us what you got. | ||
Tell us what Wisconsin has and what are you guys going to do to weaponize that? | ||
I've got two things for your viewers and your listeners. | ||
Two things. | ||
I always will say I don't want to get ahead of the president and his campaign. | ||
But what I can tell you is that there's been a petition for certionary out of Wisconsin filed as a 5 p.m. | ||
Eastern today. | ||
And that is based on the Wisconsin razor-thin decision, four to three, keep in mind, that was on technicality, not on the merits, where we had three Wisconsin state Supreme Court justices agreeing that this election in Wisconsin, where there's only a difference of 20,000 votes, was effectively stolen by the Democrats because they misused Indefinitely Confined, they misused clerks fixing ballots, and they set up collection stations for ballots where they shouldn't have. | ||
So, we are now taking that fight to the Supreme Court, where there's already a robust case out of Pennsylvania, and there's a case out of Arizona, and, as you always say, signal not the noise, there's going to be action out of Georgia as well. | ||
We're taking the fight from across the country to the Supreme Court, and it's up to the Supreme Court now to do the right thing. | ||
In the Texas case, the Texas case, in which the court wrongfully, I believe, said there was no standing, there was a need for five, five justices to say there was original jurisdiction. | ||
In these cases, where there's not original jurisdiction, but it's coming up through the federal courts or state courts, the other two ways a case can reach the Supreme Court, you only need four votes to grant certiorari. | ||
Four votes. | ||
We are 6-3 with Roberts. | ||
Let's be honest, 5-4 on the Supreme Court. | ||
I truly, deeply hope that there are four justices on the Supreme Court with the backbone and the belief in our Constitution to grant certiorari and to review the deep, disconcerting, disgusting actions by the Democrats. | ||
and subverting our rule of law and subverting Article 2 of the Constitution, which states very specifically that it is not clerks, it is not governors, it is not courts that decide how presidential elections are run in the states, it is state legislatures. | ||
So we are taking this fight to the Supreme Court. | ||
Hang on for one second. | ||
We'd like to hold you. | ||
We're going to do a quick commercial break. | ||
We're going to return with Boris Epstein, Rudy Giuliani's deputy of the legal team on the campaign. | ||
We're going to return in just a second. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
Pandemic. | ||
With Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room. | ||
Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Okay, I want to go back to the campaigns, Boris Epstein. | ||
Tell us specifically what this exercise, you had these court rulings, you had an opening, a path to victory here by looking at these indefinitely confines. | ||
They were over 200, I think 221,000. | ||
You put a team on it, Bernie Kerik put a team on it. | ||
Tell me specifically what did you guys find and how are you extrapolating that out to be something that you can use to go back to the state legislature or to put it into a court filing? | ||
Steve, here's what we found. | ||
Out of the scrubbing that was done, which was in depth, and that was taken from the overall world of over 215,000 indefinitely confined voters in Wisconsin in 2020, which is four times, four times what it was last time. | ||
Okay, in 2016, right about four times. | ||
What we found was out of the sample of 350, 50 were not indefinitely confined for sure under Wisconsin law and the Wisconsin Constitution. | ||
unidentified
|
50. | |
And then the sampling overall that we're getting is conservatively a 20% falsification rate on the indefinitely confined. | ||
Now here's what's interesting. | ||
Out of the 300 samples, the only ones found to actually have been indefinitely confined. | ||
Shut-ins, as you mentioned. | ||
Only two. | ||
Only two. | ||
Out of 300, 0.67% were actually valid indefinitely confined classifications. | ||
Okay, I want to make sure that we put this in the right perspective. | ||
Everyone watching this show, Should be, and Democrats included, should be enraged. | ||
This is just outright voter fraud. | ||
This is using also, and we've been the war room pandemic, we've got both the guys that think, all the way from a hoax to I think it's a CCP bioweapon that inadvertently leaked out, hey Miles Guo and Dr. Yan think they let it go, okay? | ||
So you've got a range here in the pandemic. | ||
They used callously and cynically, the pandemic, Okay, this was supposed to be in Wisconsin. | ||
You think it's got a lot of lefties up there. | ||
They're very tight. | ||
There's no early voting. | ||
There's no absentee voting unless you've got a real reason. | ||
But they do put it for people that are indefinitely confined, but they have that as a defined term. | ||
Here, the clerks, and not just the clerks of the Democratic Party, and Zuckerberg, and all these guys in back of them, okay, cynically use this pandemic To do ballot harvesting in the parks of Milwaukee and up there in Madison, right? | ||
So guys are now rubbing your nose in the face on social media and at jobs and everything like that, that they're using, trying to use this pandemic as an excuse, as an excuse to subvert the laws of the state of Wisconsin to get this. | ||
This, this is why, this is a wound that will not heal. | ||
And I gotta tell you, the Trump voter, being a patriot, being a believer in this Republic, and being a believer in the rule of law, and being a believer in the Constitution, will never let this go. | ||
Joe Biden, by not stepping in here, and case by case by case across the country, he will never unify this country, he will never be a unifier, and he's gonna have over 50% once this breaks through to the mainstream media where they can't, you have a forcing function where they can't stop the deluge. | ||
Okay, this is going to get to 55%, this is going to get to 60%, this is going to get to 65%. | ||
He is going to be marked in history as somebody that stood by and allowed illegal and illegitimate activity to go on on his watch under his campaign. | ||
And knowingly around it, led by Perkins Coy, this corrupt law firm, with these guys, you know, everything, they should step forward and go through this chapter and verse and refute all this, and this is why we need, this is why I think what Rudy's doing tomorrow is so important. | ||
So last question, Boris, fantastic job. | ||
In Wisconsin, do you take this back and force it to the state legislature now, or do you just go to court? | ||
Hear me loud and hear me clear. | ||
The MAGA Patriots of Wisconsin. | ||
It is now incumbent upon you. | ||
The receipts are there, including two electors, by the way, two Biden electors, who lied about being indefinitely confined. | ||
The electors are there. | ||
The information is there. | ||
It is now up to you to ensure that your elected officials in Wisconsin do the right thing, investigate this fully, use their subpoena power, have a special session, and if it is determined, as we are seeing here, again, the math is simple, 20,000 difference in Wisconsin, 20% falsification approximately, and that's conservative rate, and indefinitely confined, | ||
out of 215, that is a falsification rate of 40, that is a falsification of 43,000 ballots, and I will bet you dollars to donuts, that is 99% Democrats. So just on the indefinitely confined. | ||
99.9. | ||
Jay, I agree with you 100%. So just on that, more than enough to overturn Wisconsin for President We know there's more than enough in Georgia. | ||
We know there's more than enough in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico. | ||
Patriots Call your legislators, especially in Wisconsin. | ||
Call your elected officials. | ||
Email them. | ||
Do everything you need to do within the law and peacefully to put pressure on them to let them know that the time to stand up is now. | ||
We are fighting. | ||
We're spending every living, breathing moment. | ||
I haven't slept in weeks. | ||
And Steve knows that. He'll get calls from me all times of night. | ||
Okay, because this is what I'm thinking about. This is what I'm breathing. | ||
Okay, same with Mayor Giuliani under the ultimate leadership of President Trump. | ||
That is what we're working on. | ||
Hey, Boris, you know, I think it's important to recognize this isn't a Republican Democrat issue anymore. | ||
I think we're seeing a lot of people, particularly the Bernie populists, they're looking back. | ||
They're going, hey, this was stolen in November. | ||
What do you think happened this spring? | ||
I mean, let's get real. | ||
This guy, Joe Biden, was put in there by forces that were beyond the control of the American public and the American voter. | ||
A neoliberal. | ||
Everybody got defrauded here. | ||
It wasn't just Donald Trump supporters, it was the supporters of Bernie Sanders. | ||
We all have in common the Bernie Sanders populace and the Donald Trump populace. | ||
We put America first, we put the American worker first, and those are the guys who have been robbed and they're all waking up. | ||
This is going to have an effect across Both the traditional parties, and you're seeing this with Nancy's problems right now in terms of whether or not she's even going to be put back in. | ||
Listen, if the FBI had turned over the hard drive from hell on December 10th, the day after they got it, take you two hours to see what you got. | ||
Bernie Sanders would have been the nominee, would have had left-wing populism versus right-wing populism in a real throwdown, right? | ||
You wouldn't have had Biden. | ||
Biden is a tool of Wall Street, a neoliberal neocon supported by the system. | ||
That isn't a conspiracy, but they're no coincidences, right? | ||
A neoliberal neocon is now, you know, wants to be President of the United States, bought and paid for pound for pound by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
Boris, what's your social media handles? | ||
We got to get to Dan Schultz here. | ||
Tell us what you got going on. | ||
Steve Bannon continuing to blow up. | ||
Continuing to blow up on Instagram, Jack Max. | ||
You know it. | ||
Boris underscore Epstein. | ||
Boris underscore EPSHTEYN. | ||
Add Boris EP on Twitter. | ||
I'm about to be posting something big on Twitter and Instagram and Parler. | ||
Stand by. | ||
Add Boris on Parler. | ||
Boris underscore EPSHTEYN. | ||
Boris underscore Epstein on Instagram. | ||
Add Boris EP on Twitter. | ||
Add Boris on Parler. | ||
Thank you so much. | ||
God bless and rock and roll. | ||
Okay, go get Rudy ready for that brief moment. | ||
You had something else, Jack? | ||
No, no, no. | ||
I just think that this is part of a great awakening. | ||
The American people, I think, are also very tired of being called nutters and lunatics and dummies. | ||
Listen, all of us saw those ballots being pulled out from underneath the table in Georgia. | ||
It's on videotape. | ||
There was no water leak that meant that they had to shut the doors to all observers. | ||
As Steve says many times, there are no coincidences. | ||
And our republic is at stake, and it doesn't matter who the president is if we cannot have confidence in our electoral process. | ||
I was talking, Steve, to somebody a few weeks ago who worked on the election in Afghanistan. | ||
And he was so ashamed to think that they had photo IDs, everything in Afghanistan, and here in our own country we can't do it right. | ||
Embarrassing. | ||
Of course it only took us like, what, 7 trillion dollars to get that right in Afghanistan. | ||
Get them to do the photo ideas. | ||
Speaking of, I don't want to do a segue, but since Jack Maxey brought it up, our New Year's Day special, our special on Christmas is the Combat History of Christmas. | ||
Go back up, make sure you watch that, the Combat History of Christmas. | ||
You've got to watch that episode where we take a look at the sacrifice of American men and women on battlefields over the Christmas holiday, Hanukkah season in American history. | ||
On 1 January, The Year of Our Lord 2021, we're going to have a special two-hour show. | ||
Naturally, we're going to be working The Great Reset vs. The Great Awakening. | ||
The Great Reset vs. The Great Awakening. | ||
That's how we're going to kick off 2021. | ||
Looking downrange, okay, and bringing in the importance of today's news. | ||
The signal, not the noise. | ||
Let's go now to Dan Schultz. | ||
Dan is a beloved figure. | ||
Talk about a honey badger. | ||
Talk about a guy that grinds. | ||
He's the head of the Precinct Project, which he's trying to do a hostile takeover of the Republican Party, precinctman by precinctman, throughout the nation. | ||
He hammers all the time at what's going on. | ||
You've got a very different take on the strategy of Boris and Rudy and some of the other guys working on these projects and filing to the Supreme Court. | ||
Dan, and I want to keep you over to the next segment, just walk through concisely What is your theory? | ||
You're deeply knowledgeable about this. | ||
You're saying, hey, here's what the only focus should be right now. | ||
What is it? | ||
It should be on the Constitution. | ||
It should be on Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2. | ||
You know, the Electors' Clause of the Constitution, which John Eastman has written about and is mentioned in Bush v. Gore, obviously, and McPherson v. Blacker. | ||
And essentially what it says is is this when there's a the state the state legislators have all the power and the Republicans hold majorities in all five of these key states in state legislature. | ||
So here they are they're all making excuses about Well, we've got to do an audit. | ||
We've got to get those machines. | ||
Everybody and their dog knows that this election was fraudulent. | ||
The popular vote in all of these states on so many different levels. | ||
Your guest that you just had on went through all of it. | ||
I heard some of it before I came on. | ||
Everybody knows it's fraudulent. | ||
So what the legislators need to do in each of these five states is they need to take back that plenary power given them directly from the Constitution per Bush versus Gore and McPherson versus Blacker and say, we know this was a fraudulent election. | ||
We know that, for example, the Secretary of State's Implemented all this stuff that we never passed a law for them to do that. | ||
That on itself is grounds to say this was fraudulent. | ||
They use the Dominion machines. | ||
That was fraudulent. | ||
You know, all the other examples. | ||
We know it's fraudulent and we're going to meet. | ||
We have a majority in both chambers. | ||
We don't have to have the governor call us into special session. | ||
We don't have to have A two-thirds majority vote to call us into special session? | ||
We have a majority. | ||
We can meet in the hallway. | ||
We can meet on a Zoom call. | ||
We can meet in a cornfield. | ||
We can meet. | ||
We've got the majority and we're going to declare this was a fraudulent election. | ||
Here's why we think it's a fraudulent election. | ||
And now we're going to take back our authority under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2. | ||
And we're going to, the key word is choose. | ||
We are going to choose the rightful electors. | ||
That's in a nutshell. | ||
And what the good Republicans, the ones who believe... Hang on, hang on. | ||
Dan, hang on for one second. | ||
You just finished your first part. | ||
We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
We'll return with Dan Schultz. | ||
He's going to give us the punchline. | ||
He's saying, hey, the plenary powers in the state legislature, stop the nonsense. | ||
You don't got to be running the court. | ||
You don't be running around. | ||
Let the state legislatures perform their function. | ||
It's there in broad daylight what went on. | ||
We're going to turn with Dan Schultz of the Precinct Project when we continue on War Room Pandemic. | ||
unidentified
|
War Room Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
War Room Pandemic. | ||
Here's your host Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
Daniel Schultz from the Precinct Project is delivering the goods today. | ||
Continue on, Brother Schultz. | ||
Alright, thank you, Steve. | ||
Well, the first point I'd like to make is that this is a political question, and the reason the Supreme Court, I believe, will never take any of these cases is that they're talking amongst themselves, and they're basically saying, There's this political question doctrine that says don't take questions and decide them that the people themselves can decide or the people's elected representatives. | ||
There's nothing stopping these Republicans in these five states and the state legislatures with the majorities that they enjoy to act. | ||
They can do it. | ||
So the Supreme Court is going to sit back and say, No, we should not wait in. | ||
There is a remedy. | ||
The people elected these people. | ||
They're supposed to represent them. | ||
If they fall down on the job, that's not our problem. | ||
That's the people's problem. | ||
And so we're stuck. | ||
So the next thing we need to do is we need to be contacting all of our state legislators, the good ones in our respective states, like I've done here in Arizona, and ask the good ones to call out by name publicly the bad ones. | ||
Make them famous, or rather infamous. | ||
Think of this, if the shoe was on the other foot, if the role was reversed and Biden and Harris found themselves in this predicament, and they enjoyed, there was fraud by the Republicans, but they enjoyed Democrat majorities in these five states, the next day, the day after the election, can you doubt in any way that they would have went ahead and done what I'm saying. They would have had their legislators meet. They would have | ||
said there was obvious fraud. We reject the popular vote. | ||
The Constitution says we can do it. The Constitution gives us the plenary authority to elect the rightful electors. We're electing our electors, the Biden-Harris electors. That's what the Democrats would have done. | ||
And, you know, it's a difference between our two parties. | ||
The Democrats play to win. | ||
They play hardball. | ||
Republicans, even the so-called conservative ones who say they play hardball? | ||
No, no, no. | ||
They're playing wiffle ball. | ||
With all the balls. | ||
Kind of reminds me of a great man from Wisconsin, Vince Lombardi, and what did he say? | ||
He showed me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser. | ||
So this is the point, what Jack Maxey just made. | ||
Dan, and I agree with you, I think all the great works have gone in the Supreme Court and we've had so many people on here, I think John Eastman and others, the Attorney General of Texas did such a great job. | ||
I've said since they didn't do the expedite last week, I think they're writing some definitive opinion just to come out and wash their hands of the whole thing and say go back to the state legislatures because that's the only thing they would say anyways, they're reverted back to the state legislatures. | ||
Do you think Daniel Schultz, that if the Republicans don't step up here and do the right thing in the state legislature, is that the end of the Republican Party as we know it? | ||
It doesn't have to be, and it'll only be if the conservatives who have not gotten into the precinct committeeman ranks of our party, you know, our party has about 400,000 of these precinct committeeman slots at the precinct level. | ||
They elect everybody. | ||
They're the most powerful position in the world in terms of politics. | ||
Phyllis Schlafly had a nice pamphlet about that, and it's still there on her website. | ||
You know, I wrote a book about this. | ||
If conservatives will now flood into the local party committees and fill up all these vacant slots and take over this party, we can transform it overnight. | ||
Richard Vickery wrote a book called Takeover, and I wrote an e-book about this. | ||
And submitted my little e-book to answer this question. | ||
How do we take over the Republican Party? | ||
And it starts at the precinct level. | ||
You've got to get organized and united locally. | ||
My legislative district, we have 444 slots. | ||
We only filled 161 of them at the primary election. | ||
We elect precinct committeemen at the primary election. | ||
Daniel, we're going to have you back on because this is a topic we've got to drill down to get to. | ||
Hang on. | ||
You've got about a minute. | ||
Okay today to ensure hang on to ensure for this massive audience We got that are activists to ensure that we close on the victory of Donald Trump What is your recommendation to the audience out there that they do immediately like now? | ||
Pick a state if you're not in one of the five states pick one and then I believe I Well, maybe it's here, your war room. | ||
Maybe you've got all the phone numbers and the... We're putting them up on screen. | ||
As you're talking, we're putting it up on the screen and we're making sure people have it on the live chat. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And so like here in Arizona, I've done that already. | ||
I've, I've contacted all of my Republicans and said, get off your, you know, get off your duff. | ||
unidentified
|
I mean, uh, I sent you, I sent you a copy of the email I sent him. | |
I said at the end, you know, I've, I've outlined what can be done. | ||
Will those who we have elected to serve us step up and do it? | ||
Will you do it? | ||
And they've got the power, but they're afraid. | ||
They're afraid. | ||
And you've got to call them up, and you've got to tell them, if you don't do this, you are definitely going to be primaried. | ||
I'm going to become a precinct committeeman, and I'm going to recruit every conservative I know to become a precinct committeeman, and we're going to take you out in the next primary. | ||
2022 can't come soon enough. | ||
Actually, it's coming sooner, because tomorrow there's a rally outside of Maricopa County. | ||
You'll recall all the boards of supervisors, and it's going to go into state officials also. | ||
What is your Twitter handle? | ||
How do they get access to you, Daniel, and the Precinct Project? | ||
Well, the best place to go is theprecinctproject.wordpress.com, and hell, I don't remember what my Twitter handle is. | ||
I think it's precinct4fifi. | ||
Okay, we'll put it up. | ||
Daniel Shultz, thank you very much for joining us here. | ||
The 850th anniversary of the martyrdom of Thomas Beckett, and it was Donald Trump that came out and made a proclamation today to talk about standing up for what you believe in. | ||
Look, this is having an impact. | ||
I can tell you right now, out in Arizona, there are guys that are getting lit up non-stop, 24 hours a day. | ||
You're starting to see a shift here. | ||
That's why they're having this meeting tomorrow. | ||
Rudy's going to go up. | ||
He's going up and testifying in front of Georgia. | ||
I understand this process is not moving as quickly as any of us want, but it's moving. | ||
Jack, what do you got? | ||
Cowards and heroes are being counted right now. | ||
Start sending white feathers to some of these representatives' mailboxes because they deserve it if they're not going to stand up for this president. | ||
The Four Feathers. | ||
We'll see you tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. |