Dec. 4, 2020 - Bannon's War Room
48:11
Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well the virus has now killed more than a hundred people in China and new cases have been confirmed around the world. | |
| You don't want to frighten the American public. | ||
| France and South Korea have also got evacuation plans. | ||
| But you need to prepare for and assume. | ||
| Broadly warning Americans to avoid all non-essential travel to China. | ||
| That this is going to be a real serious problem. | ||
| France, Australia, Canada, the US, Singapore, Cambodia, Vietnam, the list goes on. | ||
| Health officials are investigating more than a hundred possible cases in the US. | ||
| Germany, a man has contracted the virus. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| Japan, where a bus driver contracted the virus. | ||
| Coronavirus has killed more than 100 people there and infected more than 4,500. | ||
| We have to prepare for the worst, always, because if you don't and the worst happens, War Room. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic. | |
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Like other media enterprises, CNN doesn't think pedophilia allegations against the powerful elite are worth covering, and they explain this on their 9 a.m. | ||
| Jeff Zucker call. | ||
| Check this out. | ||
| The President of the United States has just retweeted a post accusing Joe Biden of being a pedophile to his 86 million followers, which is just The President of the United States is doing this. | ||
| We talked about it yesterday with the pedophile thing. | ||
| When the President puts this out on his Twitter feed to 70 million plus people, you know, it's viewed by millions of people, many of whom believe that it's real. | ||
| It's insane that the president of the United States is doing this. | ||
| And two days in a row now, one, Joe Biden's a pedophile and two, Joe Biden is dancing and laughing to, you know, F the police. | ||
| And it's just, you know, I mean, again, we have to we have an issue because the more we show it or talk about it, we're actually giving it some air. | ||
| Each of these so-called handles for Trump, each of these things, we should just once again be careful to say that this is the one that is going to undo him with his voters. | ||
| We always think that. | ||
| But we need to make sure we have a sense of what's going on out in the country and not just listen to Twitter. | ||
| With regard to the with regard to the film that that that they're spreading with regard for not to see and all of that. | ||
| The Hunter Biden story was an explosive blow against Joe Biden leading up to the presidential election. | ||
| But listen on this 9 a.m. | ||
| editorial conference call at CNN how President Jeff Zucker chooses to not cover this important story. | ||
| Right Bart, New York Post, Fox News, rabbit hole of Hunter Biden, which I don't think anybody outside of that world understood last night. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal reported that their review of all corporate records showed no role for Joe Biden on the Chinese deal. | ||
| And yes, I do put more credibility in the Wall Street Journal than I do in the New York Post. | ||
| Obviously, we're not going with the New York Post story right now on Hunter Biden, which seems to be giving its marching orders to Fox News and the right-wing echo chamber about what to talk about today. | ||
| Obviously, Hunter Biden's lawyer is quoted in that New York Post piece, and we'll just continue to report out. | ||
| This is the very stuff that the president was impeached over. | ||
| This is the stuff that Senate committees looked at and found nothing wrong in Joe Biden's interactions. | ||
| Hey Jeff, it's just David on the Burisma story, and we should be awfully careful about that, obviously. | ||
| is, it seems, Ray Giuliani's sort of dream-a-vision of how to throw stuff at the wall in these closing days of the campaign. | ||
| Hey Jeff, it's just David on the Burisma story, and we should be awfully careful about that obviously, but I do think there's a media story of what in the world aren't Maggie Hammerman and Jake Sherman doing, retweeting that story. | ||
| That's the end of that story. | ||
| We'll see you next time. | ||
| What are Jake Sherman and Maggie Haberman retweeting that story? | ||
| Boy, they're really going to stand guys up and say, hey, you've got to be with the program. | ||
| That is James O'Keefe, Project Veritas. | ||
| That is him getting the recordings of the morning conference call that does the news at CNN. | ||
| You see what a joke it is. | ||
| Not even going to do any independent news themselves. | ||
| If the Wall Street Journal reports it, we'll just amplify it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Well, here's the bottom line. | ||
| The hard drive from hell is real. | ||
| Everybody knows it's real. | ||
| They've never refuted one document off it. | ||
| We are very proud of the fact that we put out the information on the hard drive from hell. | ||
| We're going to curate that and put more of it out, as Biden has said in his faux presidency, right, what he would do with China, which is basically kowtow. | ||
| The reason is he's compromised. | ||
| You saw the Jake Tapper interview. | ||
| Complete joke. | ||
| Nothing but softballs. | ||
| It wasn't even It wasn't even a coach pitch. | ||
| It was t-ball. | ||
| Right? | ||
| And so this is what they think is going to satisfy the American people. | ||
| They're dead wrong. | ||
| We are not backing off how they stole this election one iota, one inch. | ||
| And we're certainly never going to back off the fact that they are bought and paid for by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| Bought and paid for if your life is a complete mess. | ||
| Okay, if your life is a complete mess, it's because of the CCP virus, right? | ||
| And Joe Biden is going to be the guy to step up to him. | ||
| This is a complete and total joke by a propaganda department of CNN and these other places are not even smart propaganda departments. | ||
| These people are below average. | ||
| Okay, I want to bring in Rahim Kassam right now. | ||
| Rahim, I want to go through, you've known James, and the Project Veritas guys are incredible. | ||
| And what I find so laughable is, what does CNN, the very first thing they do, oh, it's a felony, we're going to call the police, right? | ||
| We're going to call the police. | ||
| They're supposed to be for all investigative reporting, you know, everything that they unearthed, or thought they unearthed about the president from the Steele dossier, all this nonsense, right? | ||
| Oh, but as soon as O'Keefe gets them, and he got them hard, because you can hear hours and hours of their just going through about how they are the propaganda department for the party of Davos, they cry and they want to run and they want to go to the police and get James O'Keefe arrested. | ||
| Walk us through what O'Keefe's found here. | ||
| how important this is and what what is the perception of cnn you think of fort going forward well again and uh... it's the uh... | ||
| and and and not for the or vice versa with cnn because it was just a couple of months ago steve that cnn was airing secretly recorded tapes of the first lady of the united states and now suddenly when it's somebody doing it to them | ||
| Now, the weird thing about them panicking like that was it was their PR team on Twitter, responding to James O'Keefe's original tweet, saying, hey, this could be a felony, we've informed our lawyers, we've informed law enforcement. | ||
| Which isn't kind of the way you might think a serious legal challenge to something like that would be leveled against James O'Keefe or Project Veritas. | ||
| I think it was more like a kind of disinformation operation on Twitter to try and stop people either watching it or sharing it, scaring people away from amplifying what James O'Keefe and Project Veritas had found. | ||
| But I'm not sure it worked. | ||
| Once again, just like we saw with the New York Post story and just like you saw there in that clip as it pertained to the Hunter Biden and the laptop from hell story, in doing so, CNN's PR team actually gave the James O'Keefe story another Streisand effect, made people even more likely to consume it, even more likely to stick around and subscribe and wait for the next load of releases to come out. | ||
| And it's been a drip, drip, drip of releases on this story for the last three days. | ||
| And it's broad. | ||
| It looks at CNN's editorial perspective and Jeff Zucker specifically in his editorial perspective, comparing not giving or rather saying that not giving Biden full transition access prematurely would lead to another 9-11. | ||
| It covers race and how CNN approaches race. | ||
| You have somebody calling Cubans, you know, saying they have an affinity towards dictators because they might be more inclined to vote for President Trump. | ||
| And it also covers, just as you said there just now, Steve, how low IQ these people are. | ||
| There was one last night, I think, that said, you know, they were joking around on the call going, ha ha, you know, if the NFL was running the White House, This thing would have been better done in terms of the Covid-19 response, the CCP virus response. | ||
| And there's much more to come. | ||
| The Project Veritas team effectively have got access to the editorial calls. | ||
| You heard in the original one we played the other day, Jeff Zucker saying, oh, I think we need to get a new system up here, a new way for people to dial in. | ||
| I've no doubt that there are further whistleblowers inside CNN who will be providing new access to the new system for Project Veritas and James O'Keefe. | ||
| So there's probably going to be a lot more, if not an unceasing amount to come. | ||
| Were you surprised about how blatant they are about what they're going to cover and how they're going to? | ||
| I mean, because this exposes them, I think, full on, because you can go back and look at the stories they had at the time they had these editorial calls. | ||
| But I mean, they really are the Praetorian Guard for Biden, right? | ||
| There was just no there's no question about that, even on the few tapes that we've heard. | ||
| Yeah I guess I'm not surprised by the line from Jeff Zucker and I'm not surprised by how both at the same time arrogant and stupid he can be and sound quite frankly on some of these calls doesn't have fully formulated thoughts you know they're just kind of uh... spitballing on these conference calls which isn't really what you want from a network president is trying to set the editorial tone uh... the network over the course of the day you know if you're going to be looking for the war of the boarding | ||
| it is that there's only sort of a genius about where we are where we stand where we're taking the stories of where or how we're gonna go uh... about about the show but for cnn there appears to be a lot of that uh... from jessica which just tells me that he's going to be effectively all that put together an intelligent but the other part of it is uh... i think you know that these guys operate like a cult They sound like a cult. | ||
| It all looks like a cult. | ||
| You don't really have that many people coming. | ||
| You might have whistleblowers who are kind of giving access to James O'Keefe and Project Veritas to the call, but you don't have that many people coming out of CNN. | ||
| and say actually you know what that wasn't a great thing that we did on this it wasn't a great thing to do you know the story how we covered on that and that's really interesting because you get back in almost every single other organization in life no matter what the industry no matter you know what the news organization is you get people who turn around and they say hey but the interesting thing about cnn is you'll notice when people leave cnn they go on to be kind of almost placed in other jobs | ||
| For instance, I mean, Lead Stories, which is one of the groups that are fact-checking this Georgia suitcase video right now in real time across social media. | ||
| Lead Stories, I think 95% of their staff or something like that came from CNN, had once worked at CNN. | ||
| So, you can see there's this kind of weird cult mentality, they stick together, it's Children of the Corn-esque, and I think these videos are going to continue to show that. | ||
| I want to go to, and I want to come into Georgia in the next segment and everything that's happening in breaking news in the investigation. | ||
| But last night, you know, Jake Tapper does this interview with nothing but softball questions. | ||
| I mean, it was really, it was coach pitch. | ||
| But the thing that Biden is trying to impress the entire time, they find it very important that President Trump participates In the inauguration, that he wants him up there to review it so the nation can see it, quote unquote, so we can unite and then move on. | ||
| How does that, given everything that we've seen, everything about holding the line, everything about holding these people accountable, how does that strike you? | ||
| Well, what they want is they want President Trump up there to be a supplicant. | ||
| They want him to be humiliated. | ||
| They want President Trump there, and they're attempting to goad President Trump into saying that he will be there, even though, as it stands right now, there is less and less of a case, as the days go on, to believe that Joe Biden will ever get to the Oval Office. | ||
| but they're putting this line out to try and make uh... the president and his team and people in the white house panic and and prostrate themselves uh... before the new overlords and is imperative not just for optics sake but for morale sake uh... that the president is to do not succumb to that do not even budge an inch uh... as far as it comes out of all the president of the states and say you know what you did you do it i'm not coming to your fraudulent inauguration | ||
| uh... so i think i think this is all in order to smooth over the finance It's built to deceive. | ||
| And Jake Tapper, as you say, should be ashamed of himself. | ||
| I think there was a standout moment there last night for me, though, which was when they were asked about what their approach to the Chinese Communist Party would be, and subsequently whether or not they believe that China should be held accountable For the Chinese Communist Party's virus, and both Kamala Harris and Joe Biden completely obfuscated, refused to be pinned down on an answer, effectively telling the world they're going to let the CCP get away with it. | ||
| OK, Rahim, hang on. | ||
| We're going to return with Rahim Kassam, my wingman here on The War Room, in a minute. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pandemic with Stephen K. Bannon. | |
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Normally, my phone blows up during the telecast and other devices we have here with people from the engine room of the War Room that are coming up with information or people in the live chat or in hashtag War Room Pandemic. | ||
| Remember, we're all about the community here. | ||
| We're all about this audience, the most powerful audience in all media. | ||
| But my phone is blowing up right now, usually about facts or figures or things maybe we're not concentrating on or tips or people's opinion. | ||
| About, hey, you should be covering this more, or we love that last segment, and you know, fight on. | ||
| Raheem, I've got to compliment you. | ||
| My phone has been blowing up about the Dickens Christmas. | ||
| They're singing the shot of Raheem Kassam. | ||
| I've actually had somebody saying, it looks so cozy, they want to take a shot and just play it up on their, you know, play it up with Christmas music. | ||
| On their iPad. | ||
| It's a Dickens Christmas at the Raheem Kassam household in Washington DC. | ||
| So I just want to give you a compliments to your better half for doing the... I know somebody does all the decoration and it's not named Raheem Kassam. | ||
| Yeah, I got to tell you that the tree I did not do. | ||
| The tree I did not have a hand in. | ||
| I think my contributions extended to sellotaping the ribbon to the fireplace there. | ||
| That was about all I did. | ||
| You said something very interesting before the break. | ||
| You said in regards to Biden, Wanting the President to be supplicant, to be humiliated. | ||
| They understand to make this grift work, they have to have Donald Trump on the podium. | ||
| As it stands right now, under no circumstances can Donald J. Trump be on the podium for the inauguration if this steal continues. | ||
| Now, we are 99.99999% certain it won't happen. | ||
| And we know it won't happen. | ||
| We're over 100% certain that it won't happen if the Republicans grow a spine. | ||
| If the Republicans grow a spine, there's zero chance that Biden can steal this. | ||
| But you understand what the Democrats need. | ||
| They must have Trump up there, as Biden said, to shake hands, look at the nation, and move on. | ||
| We're not moving on. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| This is a constitutional crisis generated by an amoral Democratic Party and the people around them. | ||
| Wall Street, the party of Davos, the global corporatist, the CCP, all of it. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| They're out to destroy the United States of America and we are not going to allow that. | ||
| And they've been caught. | ||
| So Rahim, you said it's becoming more certain every day that that won't happen, that that supplicant, that humiliation, the President Trump up there won't happen. | ||
| What is it you've seen? | ||
| Since, really, Gettysburg, the roadshow of Bernie Kerrick and Rudy Giuliani started, what, 10 days ago, on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, all the way up to today, the 4th of December, and with the explosive testimony and video in Atlanta, followed by the follow-on of Michigan and the 11 Hours in Arizona. | ||
| Why are you coming to that conclusion? | ||
| What's driving you to come to that conclusion? | ||
| Well look, there's a lot there. | ||
| Alright, let me answer your last question first, but then we've got to come back to some of the other things as well that are a constituent part of this. | ||
| Look, without what Lin Wood and Sidney Powell and those guys have been doing the last week, you wouldn't have had Kemp up there saying what he said yesterday, right? | ||
| Conducting a signature audit on the ballots. | ||
| That's just a fact. | ||
| And for the people that wanted them to sit down and shut up, this is what results look like. | ||
| And I'm sorry that you didn't like the way it happened. | ||
| And I'm sorry in the first place that the fight had to be had. | ||
| But the result occurred, right? | ||
| And it's incrementally pushing people. | ||
| You said the percentage goes up and up on President Trump holding the White House. | ||
| As long as Republicans grow a spine. | ||
| But then people ask, well, what's the probability of Republicans growing a spine? | ||
| And history has taught us that actually that's not something that people would traditionally like to bet on. | ||
| Look at what we're seeing in terms of evidence coming out. | ||
| Evidence, as you showed in the first hour, of the suitcases and the ballots being scanned in the middle of the night in Georgia. | ||
| It's all over social media. | ||
| People's minds are being changed in real time. | ||
| People who I've seen denying the whole thing for weeks and weeks, Republicans and Democrats, I'm watching them in real time on social media going, Oh, OK. | ||
| Well, look, you know, that's fair. | ||
| That's evidence. | ||
| We've been calling for evidence. | ||
| You've given us evidence. | ||
| You know, something's got to be done here. | ||
| And the numbers are changing as well, aren't they? | ||
| The numbers as the recounts come in are changing. | ||
| I think Joe Biden lost, I think, almost 20 percent of his ostensible lead in Georgia as the third recount came to fruition. | ||
| This is how the whole thing plays out. | ||
| And here's what I'd like to see. | ||
| I'd like to see the legal team, Mayor Giuliani, Janet Ellis, and their support team, lay out a timeframe. | ||
| And lay out a timeframe that is commensurate with how other nations, which have had mass mail-in ballots, how they've had to address and how the courts have had to address flawed things in those elections that they've had. | ||
| Because there have been some elections in the United Kingdom that we've had, and we've had mass mail-in ballots as well as ballot harvesting, as well as voter intimidation, that it actually took 18 months for all of the evidence to be gathered, to be heard, to be ruled upon, and then for a court to actually remove and order the removal and the banning Of a particular politician who got elected on the back of major fraud from office. | ||
| So let's lay out a timeline of events so that when the Biden team, the Democrats and the media come out and say, hey, you know, January 20th, if you haven't overturned this election and you haven't overturned our preemptive calls, then the President of the United States, Donald Trump, better be on that stage with Joe Biden. | ||
| you can say no, actually no, that's not how it's going to work. | ||
| Because there's still a time frame that may actually go on after that by which evidence will come out, continue to be heard, continue to be found, continue to be processed, and the courts will still have to weigh in after that. | ||
| I hear from sources down there that Kemp is really under a lot of pressure to call a special session. | ||
| You've got these state senators that are coming forward and putting out petitions that he's got to call one. | ||
| The president's going down there tomorrow for this rally for Purdue and Kelly Loeffler. | ||
| How incumbent do you think it is for Loeffler and Purdue to come forward now and demand a special session? | ||
| It's completely, I mean, it's imperative. | ||
| The President should caveat his endorsement on their endorsement of the rule of law, right? | ||
| He should caveat his endorsement and his saying to people, go out on voting day and cast your ballots only if these people have by that point in time, not a promise, not a pledge to do it at some point in the future, have delivered by that point in time | ||
| What would eradicate, erase and pinpoint the fraud in Georgia and commit to never, ever, ever using systems that are so easily, demonstrably, factually, evidentially, you know, in documented form like the Texas guys did with Dominion voting systems. | ||
| So easily open to fraud and grift and all of the things that third world countries do in their elections but the United States should have never been in this position to do in the first place. | ||
| He shouldn't commit to endorsing these people if there's anything but those things. | ||
| The special session is requested by Senator Beach and Senator Burt Jones is to cover two things. | ||
| Number one is not to award the electoral vote to Biden until all the evidence is dealt with at a special session. | ||
| But as importantly as the second part, which is then validate the consent decree that they signed secretly with Stacey Abrams and the Democrats to even allow this type of voting to go on, the mail-in voting and these other aspects of it. | ||
| How important do you think that is? | ||
| I mean, this is what we keep saying. | ||
| We're all for holding the Senate, but you're not going to hold the Senate unless you hold the Trump victory here. | ||
| There's zero probability you're going to get the Trump voters to come out in January. | ||
| How important do you think it is, because they don't really talk about the Lin Wood suit, which to me is so important, how important do you think is the second part of that to deal with this consent decree in this special session? | ||
| Equally. | ||
| Completely equally. | ||
| for me that the reason that i sat there and i said it was sitting in yes yesterday and i look at the barrel of a camera and i just said hey look you know if the people who are against the pressure that is being leveled against uh... leading georgian republicans at the moment the reason people get says that they've been in this position before and i understand uh... whether you'll uh... you know that is a rep right ball or your laura ingraham or whatever i understand is a personal issue that is a personal issue | ||
| the people understand never been in this position for steve i've been in this position before member i left the conservative party of the united kingdom because of the very fact that they were they were not up to stop They were not taking on the left establishment. | ||
| They were not taking on the career political classes. | ||
| They refused to see down the civil service. | ||
| They teamed up, remember, in 2010 with the Liberal Democrat Party to have a coalition government under Clegg and Cameron. | ||
| So we saw our party that we had fought for for so long being sold out. | ||
| And so what did I do? | ||
| I left and I joined Nigel Farage and the UK Independence Party and we set up a course on changing history that way instead. | ||
| You know, going around the houses to do it. | ||
| And I understand that if you're Lin Wood, that's effectively what you just did. | ||
| You said, hey, we don't owe you anything. | ||
| We do not owe the Republican Party anything. | ||
| We are independent human beings looking for justice, seeking justice. | ||
| And if it isn't with you guys, it will be somewhere else and it will be with someone else. | ||
| So maybe we have our own deal that we come up with in the long run. | ||
| Just like they'll tell you over here, if push comes to shove. | ||
| Just like they'll tell you over here, oh third party's not feasible, blah blah blah. | ||
| They said the same thing about Nigel and UKIP. | ||
| And Nigel never got elected to anything outside of the European Parliament. | ||
| Still changed history. | ||
| Still irrevocably changed history. | ||
| So I think it's equally important, I think what's really important is the argument that's being had right now. | ||
| Is there a future for patriots in the Republican Party? | ||
| That's for the Republican Party to answer. | ||
| Raheem, hang on for one second. | ||
| I just want to hold you over the break. | ||
| I want to play something Mo Brooks said yesterday on an interview with him and have you respond. | ||
| Brian Kennedy is also going to join us in Nevada. | ||
| We're going to take a short commercial break. | ||
| Brian Kennedy, Raheem Kassam, after a few commercials. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon, and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| Welcome back to our broadcast live from the nation's capital. | ||
| You're in the War Room. | ||
| Now I want to go out to Nevada. | ||
| Our in route to Nevada is Brian Kennedy. | ||
| Brian, very powerful evidentiary argument yesterday in court. | ||
| I saw the eight volumes of evidence Yeah, I know. | ||
| pretty powerful about how much cheating's going on in Nevada. I take it that's one of the reasons you're heading back out there today. Can you, I think the judge is going to rule, they said by 11 o'clock, I think, Pacific Coast time. Can you walk us through what happened yesterday, the evidence that was put forward, how compelling the President's case is in Nevada? Yeah, no, in Nevada, the attorney for the campaign is Jessie Binal, a really, really smart lawyer. | ||
| He was the lawyer with Sidney Powell for General Flynn, by the way. | ||
| So he's a real guy and a very tough guy. | ||
| He presented a very strong case for the president. | ||
| There was a massive amount of fraud that went on in Nevada. | ||
| But the main part of the Nevada argument is that the, and this is important, That the system itself broke down. | ||
| The people who were running Clark County or the other counties, when they got these large volumes of mail-in ballots, they dialed down how close they were going to scrutinize the signatures using machines without any oversight. | ||
| and they just let in perhaps as many as 130,000 ballots without adequate scrutiny. | ||
| And then you combine that with the, you know, tens of thousands here and there and just the operation of a system that was not looking for fraud. | ||
| And you combine that with the Dominion voting system in Clark County that was not itself prepared to deal with that volume of mail-in ballots and the ability of Dominion voting systems to manipulate the votes because no one can see into the software I think the Trump campaign has a very strong case to make in the next half an hour. | ||
| They'll submit their final arguments to the judge. | ||
| He wants them by 10 o'clock and he's going to rule. | ||
| He says shortly thereafter, he told he told the audience that he's going to decide quickly so that if they want to take it to the Supreme Court either side, they could do so in a timely way. | ||
| I would expect that would mean that the Trump campaign is going to lose in that sense. | ||
| But then we'll be able to take all these arguments, all the things that were not examined, and take that to the state Supreme Court. | ||
| So even though we're not going to win today, no one should think of that as a loss. | ||
| That is one more step in the necessary steps that need to be taken in order to take this up to the courts that will decide definitively what happened in the state of Nevada. | ||
| Yeah, people should understand, whoever, if we win at this level, it's going to get appealed by the opposition. | ||
| So these are all, this is the preliminary rounds. | ||
| Regardless, if we have a win, it's fine, but it doesn't really matter because it's going to get appealed, it's going to go all the way up to the state Supreme Courts, and the ones in federal court will go all the way to the Supreme Court. | ||
| I just want to ask you though, yesterday, the key was, did you hear them Not in any substantive way. | ||
| the hard evidence we had, any of the evidence of this just massive, both voter fraud, but also election fraud. | ||
| Did any of Jesse's arguments or any of his evidence get picked apart? | ||
| Not in any substantive way. | ||
| Look, a lot of the people who came forward and issued complaints, or, excuse me, signed affidavits explaining what went on, didn't want to give their name for fear of violent retribution by the Democratic establishment in Nevada. | ||
| And so they signed them as John Doe. | ||
| So the opposition lawyers or the state's lawyers basically said, you know, we don't even have one name of these people of who actually said this. | ||
| As if that was proof of anything. | ||
| The reason you don't have names is because people are afraid that the thugs in Nevada are going to take it out on honest citizens who want to stand up for the integrity of the vote. | ||
| And so, and then he says, well, we don't even have all the names of these dead people. | ||
| Well, we didn't know we had to produce the names of the dead people. | ||
| We have boxes of what their names are. | ||
| Were we supposed to name all of them in court, you know, before you and spent half an hour doing so? | ||
| I mean, there were absolutely ridiculous arguments. | ||
| Anybody listening to it should have thought that something wrong was going on there. | ||
| And the high-handed way he did it was really offensive to the lawyer for the state of Nevada. | ||
| I want to go to the Dominion Systems. | ||
| When we last saw you, you were heading out to be part of this review team with the Cyber Group. | ||
| I think it was Colonel Phil Waldron was going out with you. | ||
| They were going to get hands on the system. | ||
| His guards. | ||
| You guys were going to get their hands on this system and be able to go through it, and of course the Democrats will be there too, but that's fine. | ||
| But that's not what happened. | ||
| I think what happened between this, the court order looked pretty straightforward. | ||
| What happened between the judge's court order and the fact that, I take it, one of the reasons you're going back up there is we still don't have our hands on the system in a total free manner that we thought we were? | ||
| Well, look, this is the thing everyone's trying to get a hold of around the country, and that's the Dominion voting machines. | ||
| I spent five hours there in the Clark County Registrar of Voters Office looking at the machines, going through the boxes of certifications of, you know, them showing you that they can turn the machines back to zero. | ||
| Let me take a step back and say, The game being played here is that Dominion claims that everything inside of their system, all the software, all the tabulation machines, that they're proprietary, that they're their intellectual property, and that no one gets to see them. | ||
| And so once a state signs on to Dominion voting systems, they become judge and jury over who wins an election. | ||
| They're a black box. | ||
| They said we put the ballots in and then we're going to tell you who won and no one can challenge these. | ||
| And so what we're seeing in Nevada was a judge agreeing, OK, I guess this is proprietary and you can't look into the system. | ||
| Well, if you can't look into the system and see how you're tabulating all of these votes that get thrown into the system, how do you know who really won? | ||
| And so when you see these stories from around the country where people are questioning, you know, ballot, you know, both going from one column to another, and things seeming anomalous, it's because you can't look into the Dominion voting system and see how it actually operates. | ||
| And that's the thing that's going to be uncovered, I believe, over the next few days. | ||
| There's going to be a decision in Georgia about that this afternoon. | ||
| about getting access to the system. | ||
| So part of our cyber team flew to flew back to Georgia, part of it still in Nevada, waiting for a judge to say, this is crazy, you have to be able to examine what really transpired within the what's called ironically democracy suite software that Dominion uses to to tabulate all the votes. | ||
| I think this is what drives people crazy. | ||
| How can the government sit there and argue a private company, a vendor, essentially a contractor's or a vendor's proprietary software takes a higher priority than finding out exactly what's the story with the results of a presidential election? | ||
| How can that possibly be argued and treated with any type of anything but contempt? | ||
| And I'm hoping that you're going to find a judge or judges who agree with that point and allow honest citizens in an open and transparent way, both sides. | ||
| You know, Republicans and Democrats alike can sit there and just watch what goes on and make judgments about whether this system is right or wrong. | ||
| I think to wrap up, I think I think I think we're going to get, you know, the ability to see into the system. | ||
| Do you think that'll come in Georgia today or in Nevada? | ||
| Well, Georgia, there's a hearing this afternoon, and we should find out in several hours whether that happens in Georgia. | ||
| And in Nevada, we're going to take it, you know, straight to the Supreme Court, and we hope we get it there. | ||
| But that may take till tomorrow, I think. | ||
| Last thing, I want to go back. | ||
| We started the day in Arizona with State Representative Fincham, who had called the hearing. | ||
| He said that people are coming out of the woodwork left and right, and particularly county registrars are coming out with what things they don't feel were right in their counties. | ||
| And some of these are big counties in Arizona. | ||
| Can you give us any update on Arizona? | ||
| What's your sense? | ||
| What is it going to take to force Ducey to call for a special session? | ||
| Because in Georgia and Arizona, it looks like he's going to come down to that. | ||
| Yeah, look, I think Fincham was a real hero in that hearing. | ||
| I had a chance to spend some time with him, and he's a very brave guy and a very good guy. | ||
| I think the momentum is building for Ducey, if he wants to have any political career whatsoever to do the right thing, call a special session of the legislature. | ||
| And again, let's have honest people debate the merits of what they're finding up and down the state of Arizona when it comes to these irregularities and what it clearly looks to be fraud in so many cases. | ||
| And then honest people can debate them and follow the constitutional order to make sure that the right people are sat as electors. | ||
| Before we get to any of the deadlines. | ||
| I think it's building. | ||
| I think it's really building. | ||
| building. | ||
| You think my men are building in Arizona? | ||
| I do. | ||
| I just think you guys have done a tremendous job in Arizona and Nevada. | ||
| Last thing, so what's the game plan today? | ||
| You're going to hear from, you're going to submit final arguments, Jesse and the team, final arguments in the next hour. | ||
| You should hear back by 11 o'clock, I guess 2 o'clock, East Coast time. | ||
| What is the rest of it? | ||
| How's the rest of the day flow through? | ||
| I will go then, you know, they're prepared to go then straight to the Supreme Court, State Supreme Court. | ||
| And see whether whether they can get relief there and whether the state Supreme Court will entertain the arguments that were not entertained in the lower court. | ||
| And there's several places where I think the judge just wanted to get it as quickly as possible to the next level. | ||
| And so I think I mean, the state Supreme Court, it has to be ready for this. | ||
| And it's going to be ready for this, whether that's going to be today or tomorrow. | ||
| I'm not yet sure. | ||
| Brian, how do people, do you have Twitter, Parler, how do people keep track of you during the day? | ||
| Because I know people, a lot of our audience follows us minute by minute. | ||
| Yeah, on Twitter it's at BrianTKennedy1, and on Parler it's at Brian Kennedy. | ||
| You're a real warrior, been out there fighting the good fight in both Arizona and Nevada, making huge progress. | ||
| Brian, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Thanks, Steve, great to be with you. | ||
| Brian Kennedy in route to Nevada right now and I take it this is the you know we've covered this now what for four weeks and they first started trying to do this deal actually we've talked about this for months and how they were going to do this deal we've had many of the people and voices that you're hearing coming on throughout the country In that time, people like Rudy Giuliani, Brian Kennedy, I mean, this is nothing new to this audience, but I think what you're seeing now is that hard evidence is being put forward, whether that is in Nevada, whether it's in Georgia, whether it's in Arizona, whether it's in Wisconsin. | ||
| Remember, one falls, they all fall. | ||
| And I got to tell you, of everything we've talked about today, still, I think of all the promising opportunities to really show the truth and get to the bottom of this. | ||
| I think one of the one that's going to be the clearest is what's happening in Wisconsin. | ||
| Of course, Wisconsin, you know, the media said, oh, this is another huge defeat. | ||
| It was anything but. | ||
| If you read the opinion, you read what the justice said about the evidence. | ||
| But here's what's becoming so compelling that Biden and his team cannot run and hide from. | ||
| And they can ask for President Trump to be up there on the podium. | ||
| They can ask for everything they want. | ||
| It's not going to happen. | ||
| This election was stolen. | ||
| If President Trump works with Joe Biden to get to the bottom of this truth, that's how you unite the country. | ||
| Otherwise, it's going to take President Trump's believers, President Trump's followers, President Trump's voters to hold the line and to demand accountability, to demand accountability in OK, we're going to return. | ||
| I'm going to play you something we had with Mo Brooks last night. | ||
| I want to get your responses in the War Room. | ||
| We take a short commercial break. | ||
| Mo Brooks, when we return. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War Room. | |
| Pandemic. | ||
| With Stephen K. Banham. | ||
| The epidemic is a demon and we cannot let this demon hide. | ||
| War Room. | ||
| Pandemic. | ||
| Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. | ||
| ...on the law. | ||
| A lot of people don't understand this. | ||
| They think that election contests for federal offices are adjudicated by federal judges of the Supreme Court. | ||
| That is categorically false. | ||
| While the federal judiciary does have a role under the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 4 and 5, and Article 2 and the 12th Amendment, the United States Congress hears and rules on with finality. | ||
| All election contests involving congressmen, senators, and the President of the United States. | ||
| So that being the case, on January the 6th, at 1pm, the states are going to submit to the United States Congress, in a joint session presided over by Vice President Mike Pence, their purported winners of their electoral college votes. | ||
| At which point in time, if a congressman and a senator jointly object to a state submission, Then, that triggers as much as a two-hour debate in the House and a two-hour debate in the Senate, and we then, as bodies, separate bodies, vote to accept or reject that state's Electoral College submission. | ||
| And quite frankly, I'm going to object to Pennsylvania on the House side. | ||
| I'm going to object to Georgia on the House side. | ||
| I'm probably going to object to some others, because I am persuaded that their election systems are so badly flawed that the person who got a majority of the lawful votes cast by eligible American citizens did not get those electoral college votes that they should That the election theft, the voter fraud, was that bad. | ||
| But I'm persuaded that if you count only lawful votes cast by eligible American voters, and you count nothing else, that Donald Trump easily won the Electoral College. | ||
| And that's how I'm going to conduct myself on January 6th with these Electoral College submissions by the states. | ||
| ...to our election system and some of the other systemic flaws that the Democrats are exploiting, and that persuaded me that they have very aggressively fought to steal this election from the will of American citizens. | ||
| And keep in mind, the socialists have a track record. | ||
| They're not at all hesitant to engage in egregious activities to impose their social dictate on the rest of the population. | ||
| If you look at Nazi Germany, socialists. | ||
| Soviet Union, socialists. | ||
| Communist China, socialists. | ||
| They actually exterminated tens of millions of their countrymen and others who believed in freedom in order to eliminate that threat to the consolidation of their political power. | ||
| If socialists are willing to do that, Over history in these other nations and not just those three but others around the globe then certainly they're willing to commit the lesser crimes of voter fraud and election theft and that is exactly what has happened in my judgment. | ||
| That is Mo Brooks from the 5th District, a congressman from the 5th District in Alabama, a real hero. | ||
| One of the original, if not the original populist, prairie populist in the Congress, a nationalist, a guy who actually should be in the United States Senate, it should have been him, that ran against Luther Strange. | ||
| uh... in in beat him uh... just a real tragedy why that didn't happen but an american hero he's laying out what the facts are uh... if this is not uh... it is donald trump won an overwhelming victory in the electoral college of that there's no doubt all we're doing now is trying to secure that victory and we're securing it through the courts were considered securing it through the state legislatures but as mo broke says hey hang on the guys at the end of the day in the constitution make the final | ||
| determination is uh... is is the congress And he's bound and determined to have a full review of these questionable states, and we went through on the show last night, just partially, I talked to him beforehand, he thinks there's broad election fraud and voter fraud in a number of states, as we're seeing. | ||
| So this is far from over. | ||
| So don't think that the 14th of December, I happen to believe right now is the path we're heading down, that there will not be enough electoral votes for Joe Biden by the 14th, and this will get kicked into the House for a contingent election in January. | ||
| But regardless of that, Mo Brooks is saying, hey, he's going to team up with senators, and they're going to debate state by state the ones they think are questionable. | ||
| And right now, if you look at the evidence, look at the receipts, you look at what happened in Georgia, you look at what happened yesterday in Nevada, you look at what's going on now in Arizona, you look at the court case in Wisconsin, particularly look at what the justice said about the evidence. | ||
| Remember, yesterday was not a defeat in Wisconsin. | ||
| They went there to try to get a feel from the Supreme Court about the evidence. | ||
| They understood they were going to get kicked back to a district court, and they realize it's a tight run. | ||
| I think they posted a bond on Thursday. | ||
| I think they're filing again today. | ||
| I believe they're going to have a hearing over the weekend or a hearing tomorrow morning. | ||
| In addition, I'm just hearing now, I was contacted in the break, I believe you're going to see another major lawsuit filed with plaintiffs in Pennsylvania that's going to come in a matter of hours. | ||
| We're going to have that on the 5 o'clock show. | ||
| A very reputable people in Pennsylvania have now pulled together additional evidence, I believe including Phil Klein's from Phil Klein's press conference the other day with the truck driver with the missing trailer, right? | ||
| The evidence here is just overwhelming. | ||
| I think people are getting more and more outraged every day as they should. | ||
| The watchword here is we are holding the line and we're not going to flinch at all. | ||
| We don't care what people say. | ||
| We don't care how they take us down. | ||
| We don't care, you know, what their attitudes are. | ||
| This is deeper than President Trump. | ||
| President Trump knows that. | ||
| He talks about it all the time. | ||
| This is about the Constitution. | ||
| The other day, President Trump, who's not someone to play games, said this is the most important speech of his entire administration. | ||
| In a historic four years that's done more to kind of re-pivot this country, to start thinking about what's the most important things in the world and take leadership thereof. | ||
| He said the most important speech he had given, 46 minutes long, and I would ask you, could Joe Biden ever give a 46 minute speech like that with the level of detail? | ||
| President Trump gave a 46 minute speech of incredible detail and laid out The way they try to steal this. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be back at five o'clock, but I got to tell you, we're fighting on every front. | ||
| There's good news coming out of every front. | ||
| Yes, you are going to have setbacks every day, but we're moving forward and people, and this is what's great about this, people are getting more and more outraged and right now you're seeing The crickets from the media want to cover the evidence, more importantly, what they're doing. | ||
| And now they want Trump up on that podium. | ||
| It's not going to happen. | ||
| The other thing I want to say is I'm so proud. | ||
| Last Stands by Michael Walsh is number one bestseller on Amazon, I think in history, because of this audience. | ||
| Michael Walsh, Last Stands. | ||
| Why men fight when all is lost. | ||
| Well, things are far from lost here, but we're still fighting. | ||
| Make sure you get Michael Walsh's book, Last Stands. | ||
| Like I said, it's great. | ||
| Particularly for young men in your life. | ||
| It's a great Christmas gift. | ||
| Last Stands by Michael Walsh. | ||
| Really proud of the book-buying power of the audience of The Deplorables and Lao Bai Jing. | ||
| Okay, we're going to be back at five o'clock. | ||
| There's so much breaking news on this Friday. | ||
| We're going to be jam-packed today. | ||
| day. See you at five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're taking down the CCP. Spread the word all through Hong Kong. We will fight till they're all gone. | |
| We rejoice when there's no more! |
Export Selection