| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Well, earlier this week, I sat down with Gavin Newsom. | ||
| I'm going to show you what happened when that happened because it was pretty spicy. | ||
| Plus, the latest on ICE, will the president invoke the Insurrection Act? | ||
| And in Iran, is action still imminent? | ||
| First, the wait is almost over in less than one week. | ||
| On Thursday, January 22nd, episodes one and two of the Pendragon cycle, Rise of the Merlin, arrive exclusively on Daily Wire Plus. | ||
| Here's the truth. | ||
| No one was ever going to make this. | ||
| No one was willing to bring the legend of Merlin to life with the scale and conviction it demands. | ||
| It was too big, too demanding, too risky. | ||
| Again, the values are also different in this version of Merlin because it is all about basically how Christianity came to Europe. | ||
| We built this company by doing what no one else would. | ||
| Now, we're doing the same thing with entertainment. | ||
| Episodes one and two of the seven-part epic premiere for all Daily Wire Plus members. | ||
| Be here when it happens. | ||
| Join now at dailywireplus.com. | ||
| Well, folks, on Tuesday, I sat down with California Governor Gavin Newsom on his podcast. | ||
| He does a podcast. | ||
| He sits down once every few weeks with somebody. | ||
| He invited me on, so I flew out to Sacramento and we sat in the governor's mansion in Sacramento and did what is about a two-hour podcast. | ||
| It is well worth the listening. | ||
| You'll hear us go through a number of topics. | ||
| It was a sort of fascinating experience, not only because Governor Newsom, of course, is the governor of the most populous state in the union, a state that I left back in 2020 with my company and with my family, thanks to what I believe to be serious misgovernance in California. | ||
| It's fascinating because right now, according to the polling data, it is very likely that Newsom will be the Democrats nominee in 2028. | ||
| When you look at the potential field of Democratic nominees right now, I've said before I think AOC is underrated as a possible nominee. | ||
| She's likely to do well in places like Iowa and New Hampshire. | ||
| The problem is once you move to the South, AOC's numbers start to dwindle. | ||
| And she's not going to win California if Newsom is in the field. | ||
| Kamala Harris right now in the polling data for 2028 is a placeholder. | ||
| Just like every other election of my lifetime, after somebody loses, they remain the quote-unquote frontrunner for the nomination for the next election cycle for a short period of time. | ||
| And let's just say it's a rarity for somebody to come back the way that President Trump actually did in 2024 and then win a nomination after losing a presidential race. | ||
| Typically, nominees who lose go away. | ||
| Mitt Romney in 2013, if you look at the early polling, would probably have been the frontrunner for 2016, but obviously he was nowhere close to the nomination by the time we hit the next election cycle. | ||
| So it ain't going to be Kamala Harris on the Democratic side of the aisle. | ||
| Newsom has heavy fundraising power. | ||
| He's obviously a governor of a very populist state. | ||
| He has positioned himself as the quote-unquote anti-Trump in the field. | ||
| And he's done that by being very, very loud on social media. | ||
| And so it was fascinating to sit down with him, ask him some pretty pointed questions about governance in California and where he thinks the country is going. | ||
| And I think the entire discussion is worth listening to or watching. | ||
| A few things about Governor Newsom. | ||
| First of all, in person, very personable guy for sure. | ||
| Most politicians are, by the way, large number of politicians, very good in person. | ||
| Gavin Newsom is very quick on his feet. | ||
| He's a person who is going to spend his time, I would imagine, trying to avoid serious charges about the state of California. | ||
| And he knows his own policy record and he knows where the holes are. | ||
| And so he's pretty good at sticking and moving with regards to the holes in those policies. | ||
| We'll discuss that in a moment. | ||
| The biggest problem for Gavin Newsom is a problem for the Democratic Party. | ||
| In order for him to appeal to the broad middle of the electorate, he is going to have to jettison some core Democratic positions that are just unpopular with the American people. | ||
| And so I think one of the reasons that Governor Newsom decided that he was going to have me on his show was specifically to do that, to make overtures to the middle. | ||
| Now, you can decide for yourself how genuine you think those overtures are. | ||
| You can decide whether you think the real Gavin Newsom is the moderate or whether you think the real Gavin Newsom is the former San Francisco mayor who has been radical rhetorically for a large part of his career. | ||
| Or maybe there is no real Gavin Newsom, right? | ||
| These are sort of the questions you have to ask about any politician. | ||
| Anybody who sits down in front of you, who wants to win your vote, is a person who could be masquerading as a moderate, could be masquerading as an extremist, could be just masquerading all the time, right? | ||
| You just don't know. | ||
| And so I'm going to tell you, you should watch that show and you should make your own decisions about Gavin Newsome. | ||
| We're going to play some of the clips from the show, largely because I think it demonstrates the difficulty that Democrats have moving forward as a party. | ||
| Everything that Newsom said that sounds good is a moderate to Republican position. | ||
| Everything he said that I think sounds not particularly good is a Democrat radical position that I don't think holds up under scrutiny. | ||
| And so the question is going to be whether the base of the Democratic Party allows Gavin Newsom to become the nominee, even if they perceive that he is semi-moderate. | ||
| Now, again, in policy, he's not particularly moderate. | ||
| If you look at California, California is very immoderate in terms of its spending, in terms of its social policy around, for example, the trans issues, around things like DEI or immigration. | ||
| Now, Gavin Newsom will tell you that his record has been more moderate than the actual state of California. | ||
| And very typically, the more extreme policies he will attribute to the local officials in his state. | ||
| That's sort of his typical move here. | ||
| In fact, this is something that I asked him about because I do think that it is indicative of a way that politicians very frequently will escape their own records. | ||
| Instead of you judging them on their output, you're supposed to judge them on their intent and then they can sort of blame everybody else for failure to achieve what they quote unquote wanted to achieve. | ||
| So, for example, there was one point where I was questioning Governor Newsom about the fact that he had promised to build millions of housing units in California. | ||
| I was really grilling him on the fact that housing prices in California are exorbitant at this moment in time, and they have been for quite a while. | ||
| And I got him to agree that overpromising and under delivering is a bad road to make policy. | ||
| And they usually are talking about using the power of government in order to facilitate and make that change happen, particularly on the Democratic side of the aisle. | ||
| And it seems to me that that is a recipe for disaster for the American body politic, because if you make promises that cannot be fulfilled, because the system does not allow for it to be fulfilled, people inherently end up frustrated. | ||
| And, you know, I have relatives who still live in the state of California. | ||
| I visit it routinely, and they're making a very good living. | ||
| I have a sister-in-law and brother-in-law who live in LA. | ||
| They make a combined excellent living, and they're barely making their mortgage. | ||
| And the housing costs are too high. | ||
| The cost of living is too high. | ||
| I believe the poverty rates in California on a cost-adjusted basis are some of the highest in the nation. | ||
| Right there with Florida. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct. | |
| When you look at the supplemental poverty index, when you look at poverty broadly, you define it's slightly above average. | ||
| Supplemental Florida and California, right? | ||
| If you're looking at real estate costs in particular are extraordinary in the state of California. | ||
| As you say, you're trying to remove regulations. | ||
| But the problem is that unless we are willing to recognize a fundamental reality, which is that the relationship of the American people with their government needs to change. | ||
| And so if you listen to him there, he sounds like a moderate, right? | ||
| Don't overpromise. | ||
| Don't underdeliver. | ||
| Government should probably promise to do less. | ||
| I mean, that sounds like a Republican policy. | ||
| And herein lies the problem for Governor Newsom and for the Democratic Party. | ||
| The stuff that sounds good is him moving away from the rhetorical and policy radicalism Democrats have embraced. | ||
| More on this in a moment. | ||
| First, as we move into 2026, many businesses, including the Daily Wire, are ramping up hiring efforts to meet ambitious new objectives. | ||
| But bringing those goals to life requires assembling the right team. | ||
| And that's easier said than done. | ||
| Today's hiring landscape presents unique obstacles from sourcing candidates with niche expertise to sifting through overwhelming numbers of applications to find the truly qualified prospects. | ||
| For companies facing these hurdles, our sponsor, Zip Recruiter, offers a solution designed to streamline the entire hiring process. | ||
| Right now, you can explore what ZipRecruiter has to offer at no cost by visiting ziprecruiter.com/slash daily wire. | ||
| ZipRecruiter's matching technology really cuts through the typical hiring headaches. | ||
| As soon as you post a role, you can see exactly how many qualified candidates are in your area. | ||
| No guessing, no waiting around. | ||
| Their resume database lets you go straight to top candidates and access their contact information immediately. | ||
| That saves both time and money. | ||
| It's no surprise. | ||
| They're the number one rated hiring site on G2. | ||
| When you're running a company, you need tools that actually deliver results, and that's what ZipRecruiter does. | ||
| Let ZipRecruiter help you find the best people for all your roles. | ||
| Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the very first day. | ||
| See for yourself. | ||
| Just go to this exclusive web address right now and try ZipRecruiter for free. | ||
| ziprecruiter.com slash daily wire. | ||
| Again, that's ziprecruiter.com slash dailywire. | ||
| Also, the American dream has always been about building something of your own, taking an idea, some hard work, turning it into a thriving business that you can call your own. | ||
| For generations, entrepreneurship has been the cornerstone of that dream. | ||
| Getting started used to mean gigantic upfront costs, technical headaches, a mountain of obstacles before you could even open your doors. | ||
| And that's where our sponsor, Shopify, comes in. | ||
| It's the tool that puts the American dream within reach for anyone ready to chase it. | ||
| Shopify is the commerce platform powering millions of businesses worldwide, including 10% of all U.S. e-commerce and even our own Daily Wire shop. | ||
| The best part, you don't need to be a web designer to get started. | ||
| They've got beautiful, ready-to-go templates that match your brand right out of the box. | ||
| Or if you need some extra help along the way, their AI tools can handle everyday tasks like enhancing product images, writing product descriptions, and generating discount codes. | ||
| And if you're worried about getting your brand out there, Shopify makes it simple to run email and social media campaigns that actually reach customers. | ||
| Plus, if you ever get stuck, their award-winning 24-7 customer support is always there to help you figure things out. | ||
| This year, turn those dreams into and give them the best shot at success with Shopify. | ||
| Sign up for your $1 per month trial. | ||
| Start selling today at shopify.com/slash Shapiro. | ||
| Go to shopify.com slash Shapiro. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's shopify.com/slash Shapiro. | |
| So there were multiple times in the interview that we did in which I pressed him on a particular radical Democrat policy and he disavowed it. | ||
| So this happened most obviously with regard to immigration and customs enforcement. | ||
| So I asked him about ICE because obviously ICE has been at the top of the news. | ||
| And as we've talked about on the show, the governor's press office put out a statement calling what happened in Minneapolis with regard to Renee Goode, the shooting of Renee Goode, as state-sponsored terrorism. | ||
| And the governor immediately disavowed his own press office. | ||
| One was a narrative that was immediately pushed by the Trump administration and Secretary of Homeland Security, Christine Noam, that she was a domestic terrorist who was attempting to run over officers with her car and was legitimately trying, not just this officer, but multiple officers. | ||
| That was the original statement. | ||
| I said at the time, I thought that was untrue. | ||
| And then your press office tweeted out that it was state-sponsored terrorism, which, I mean, governor, I just have to ask you about that. | ||
| That sort of thing makes our politics worse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| I mean, it does. | ||
| And our ICE officers obviously are not terrorists. | ||
| A tragic situation is not state-sponsored terrorism. | ||
| Yeah, I think that's fair. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So again, they put out the rhetorically radical stuff and then they back off of it. | ||
| I also asked him about the sort of defund ICE movement that's gained all sorts of credibility in left-wing circles in the aftermath of Renee Good's shooting. | ||
| And here was Gavin Newsom. | ||
| AOC said this week that ICE should be abolished. | ||
| You disagree? | ||
| Oh, I disagree when I think a candidate for president by the name of Harris said that in the last campaign. | ||
| I came out. | ||
| I was, I remember being on Chris Hayes hours later saying, I think that's a mistake. | ||
| So absolutely. | ||
| He sounds like a moderate there. | ||
| I asked Gavin Newsom about why the Democratic Party hasn't done more speaking about, for example, the Iranian regime. | ||
| And he came out, he said the Democratic Party should do more with regard to the Iranian regime. | ||
| Because right now, for example, where are the members of the Democratic Party protesting and wearing pins for the protesters in Iran who are getting mowed down, maybe by the tens of thousands this week? | ||
| Well, I know where I am. | ||
| put out a pretty clear statement this week. | ||
| I'd like to see more Democrats. | ||
| Yeah, I don't disagree with you. | ||
| And by the way, I also thought it was, I thought it was the right thing to do, that strike. | ||
| And I thought it was unbelievably effective and efficient and had no problem saying that during the strike, didn't wait for the outcome. | ||
| So yeah, I marched to a beat of a little bit of a different drum, a little bit more nuance here. | ||
| But there is, look, everything's so black and white. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's just, there's nuance here. | |
| Again, you can see him attempting to move to the middle on all of these issues. | ||
| Same thing with regard to the claim by so many Democrats, including Scott Weiner, who is the person now running for Nancy Pelosi's seat in San Francisco that Israel committed a genocide, which is factually untrue. | ||
| I quizzed the governor on that. | ||
| And again, he said, I don't think that's true either. | ||
| And then he sort of started to get, you know, I would say a little bit slippery about why he won't just come out and condemn Democrats who are telling that lie. | ||
| Democrats have now been dragged into this conversation, some drag, some run with, you know, flags waving into the conversation. | ||
| The definition of genocide. | ||
| Yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| I mean, look, Israel did not commit a genocide in Gaza. | ||
| There is no standard by which Israel committed a genocide in Gaza. | ||
| It's just on a factual level. | ||
| Just as a legal and factual level. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| What is your opinion of this? | ||
| My opinion is I understand the tendency for people to make that, to assert that on the basis of the images and the proportionality. | ||
| It doesn't mean genocide. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| And by the way, I agree with you. | ||
| And international and internationality doesn't mean that if you kill my child and I then kill seven criminals, that I've been disproportionate. | ||
| I'm not disagreeing with you, but I think the but I understand that tendency on the basis of trying to reconcile the proportionate nature of how the war was ultimately conducted. | ||
| Why do you feel the need to create a permission structure for that sort of stuff? | ||
| I mean, meaning it's not true. | ||
| Why not just say it's not true? | ||
| Yeah, look, I don't know the definition or I don't know the legal threshold. | ||
| That's not my opinion. | ||
| So I don't share that opinion as it relates to genocide. | ||
| I do not agree with that notion. | ||
| Again, watch as he tries, again, to avoid the rhetorical complications of endorsing the radical side of his own party. | ||
| Same thing with regard to the trans issue. | ||
| I grilled him on why he believes, apparently, that a boy can become a girl, or does he believe that a boy can become a girl? | ||
| Why has the state of California taken a wide variety of actions to quote unquote protect boys becoming girls, which is to say, in my opinion, be predatory toward children who are suffering from gender dysphoria and hormonally or surgically mutilate them. | ||
| And he really did not have a good answer on this either. | ||
| Again, this is the problem for the Democratic Party on these issues, that a good Democratic candidate is going to make the radical issues secondary or ignore them. | ||
| But in doing so, he or she is going to piss off his own party. | ||
| Because if you look at X today, X is filled with people on the left who are livid with Gavin Newsom for not endorsing every radical left position. | ||
| Here is Gavin Newsom not being able to answer the question on trans, presumably for political reasons. | ||
| Since, again, we all know the biological realities here. | ||
| But this idea that people are going to public schools and coming back, having surgeries and coming back the next day is absurd. | ||
| But there are certainly cases in which kids are being quote unquote socially transitioned at school without parents knowing about it. | ||
| I know some of the parents to whom this has happened. | ||
| I mean, this is the fundamental question that lies at the root of all of this is the question that you're not wanting to answer, which is whether boys can become girls. | ||
| Yeah, I just, well, I think for the grace of God. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I mean, I appreciate the sympathy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I also feel terrible for listen, anybody who's suffering with any sort of Generations for time immemorial. | |
| Yeah, again, just trying to avoid the question. | ||
| So, Gavin Newsom wants to be a moderate, right? | ||
| At least he wants to play moderate when it comes to running in a general election, except when it comes to a couple of issues. | ||
| One of them, of course, is Trump. | ||
| And this is, I think, Gavin Newsome's secret sauce as a candidate is that he, in person, and again, rhetorically, when you're speaking with people like me, he appears to be a moderate or move toward moderation. | ||
| You can believe him or not believe him. | ||
| I'm just presenting you with what he was saying to me on camera. | ||
| And then there is the stuff where he does not want to appear moderate, and that's particularly on Trump. | ||
| So, Democrats seem to believe that if they campaign against Trump in 2028, that that will be enough. | ||
| And listen, we can say that that's crazy and that may that won't work. | ||
| But I'm old enough to remember when Democrats campaigned against George W. Bush in 2008, right? | ||
| He was on his way out, and they took George Bush and they hung him over John McCain, who is a large-scale opponent of Bush in a wide variety of matters, and tried to paint McCain as his natural heir. | ||
| Well, I assume that Gavin Newsom will do the same thing with JD Vance, should JD Vance be the nominee. | ||
| And so I pushed Gavin Newsom on the idea that he really believes the 2028 election is in danger of being stolen or overthrown. | ||
| I don't believe that he believes that because otherwise, why would he be running if he truly believes that our elections are on the precipice of being overthrown? | ||
| By the way, I don't like that on the right, and I don't like it on the left. | ||
| I've been saying this for years. | ||
| I've been perfectly consistent in this position, as with many of my other positions. | ||
| Here was the exchange. | ||
| If you go on Stephen Colbert and say you're worried there won't be a legit election in 2028, but I feel that. | ||
| I mean, if I believe that. | ||
| Do you really believe that? | ||
| I really believe that. | ||
| But then why are you running? | ||
| Or why would you consider it? | ||
| I want to make sure those, because we have agency, we can shape the future. | ||
| It's not something to experience. | ||
| But I didn't believe it when President Trump said. | ||
| It's what President Trump said in 2022. | ||
| I think he wants, I believe, and he tries to. | ||
| Do you truly believe that President Trump is going to try to run in 2028? | ||
| No, I believe that he'll try to wire the outcome in 2028. | ||
| I really don't. | ||
| See, this sort of stuff is very dangerous to me. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So again, this is where he's sticking his flag. | ||
| He's sticking his flag on the left with Trump is going to steal the election. | ||
| The Republicans are just so terrible. | ||
| And then on the other hand, he's sort of playing footsie with the middle. | ||
| And then there is the third prong of Newsome, which, of course, is his record. | ||
| Now, as somebody who left his state and took my family and took our company and moved it and who visits the state pretty frequently and has to hear about the difficulties of being a police officer in LAPD or the difficulties of making a living in Los Angeles or San Francisco. | ||
| I have opinions on how things work in California since I lived my entire life there and watched quality of life radically degrade over the course of decades. | ||
| Gavin Newsom's position seems to be that his policies are better than other Republican states. | ||
| He very often will not defend them on their own merits. | ||
| Instead, what he will say is it's better than Louisiana or something. | ||
| He tried to do this with regard to his tax policy. | ||
| And I sort of said, well, I'm here talking to you, not to the governor of Louisiana, but okay. | ||
| About radically lowering the income tax rates in the state. | ||
| Well, California has tax. | ||
| I mean, there's 16 states right now. | ||
| Let's talk about those 16 states. | ||
| Why don't we talk about California? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's the point. | |
| Well, I'm going to say that tax their low-wage earners more than California taxes its high-wage earners. | ||
| Let's talk about lowering those tax rates in those 16 states. | ||
| Now, what he's talking about, again, he doesn't want to talk about California. | ||
| He wants to talk about the fact that if you go to some red states that don't have a state income tax, but they do have sales tax and excise tax, that it's possible that if you're a low-income earner, you're paying a quote-unquote higher percentage of your income than somebody who is a high earner in, say, Florida. | ||
| And there's truth to that. | ||
| So his brag is that the state income tax in California is very, very progressive. | ||
| That's a brag for him. | ||
| The question is, what is the goal of tax policy? | ||
| Is the goal of tax policy, quote-unquote, fairness? | ||
| Because by that metric, you're going to have to establish when does a tax structure become quote unquote fair? | ||
| When are the rich paying enough and all the rest? | ||
| Or is the goal of a tax structure a practical question? | ||
| Meaning, is the goal of taxes to cover revenue for public services without killing the innovation and the job growth? | ||
| Because listen, if the goal is just to show that you're fair, it's very easy to do Governor Newsom's routine here. | ||
| You say, hey, look, the rich people are paying a lot of money and the poor people are paying no money. | ||
| Isn't that fair? | ||
| The problem is that public policy is designed to create better quality of life, not to make you feel better in your innards. | ||
| And so when you look at the state of California right now, rich people who create the jobs, okay, the lie that the poor create jobs in the United States or anywhere else on earth, it is and always has been a lie, which is why the poorest countries generally have the fewest productive jobs. | ||
| It is people who innovate, invest, build, who end up creating the mechanisms by which everybody else's life gets better and they get paid. | ||
| That doesn't mean that labor isn't an element of that. | ||
| It means that labor is only one element of that, not the only element of that. | ||
| So to take, for example, California and Florida, the state to which I moved, and he loves targeting Florida, of course, because he sees Governor DeSantis as a possible counter to him. | ||
| They had a sort of interesting debate a while back, I believe on CNN, Newsom and DeSantis, which kind of ended in a tie, I would say. | ||
| The private sector job growth in Florida since 2019 has been 10.6% versus 4.8% for California. | ||
| And a huge percentage of that private sector job growth in California has been in the tech sector, large swaths of which are now seeking to relocate because of the tax and regulatory structure in California. | ||
| So you can have a fair tax structure. | ||
| You could be fully communist and have, quote unquote, the fairest tax structure where everybody's income belongs to the government and they redistribute it according to need, right? | ||
| That's the communist way. | ||
| It turns out not only is it not fair, because again, how you define fairness is the question. | ||
| The way I define fairness is people get to keep the products of their labor that people are allowed to achieve in consonance with their skill set and efforts. | ||
| That is fairness to me. | ||
| What people like Gavin Newsom, I think, mean by fair is that we can look at outcomes and determine whether fairness has been achieved. | ||
| If we don't all make the same amount of money, obviously things are unfair. | ||
| But the goal of tax policy is presumably to create a thriving state. | ||
| Job growth in California is half that in terms of percentage in the private sector of that in California. | ||
| Total real GDP growth since 2019 has been somewhere on the average of 2.3% every year. | ||
| In Florida, it's been double that, like 4.6%. | ||
| California had a major population decline. | ||
| It was all domestic exodus. | ||
| It was people who lived in California, like me and my family, moving out. | ||
| And then the reverse of that, which I did discuss with him on his show, was achieved by in-migration from other countries. | ||
| So from Mexico, from China, from other places. | ||
| I mean, if you have a giant outmigration of your citizens and people from other countries are coming in, that is not a great sort of indicator of how well you are being governed for sure. | ||
| In 2024, for example, California lost 239,000 residents to domestic migration, but gained 361,000 international immigrants. | ||
| Is that an indicator of economic health, of lifestyle health in the state of California? | ||
| One of the things he tried to say about population in our interview was the governor tried to claim that, well, on a per capita basis, more people left Florida to go to California than left California to go to Florida. | ||
| You can't use per capita for this. | ||
| And I'll give you a very basic mathematical example. | ||
| Let's say that you have a country with two people, and then you have another country with 100 people. | ||
| And let's say that 40 of those 100 people go to the tiny country. | ||
| And let's say that of the original two people in the small country, one of them goes to the more populous country. | ||
| Well, if you did that on a per capita basis and the smaller country per capita sent more citizens than the large country sent to the small country, but that makes no sense. | ||
| If you're a country with 100 people and 40 of them leave to go to a smaller place and one of the two people in the smaller place leaves to go to the bigger place, why would you possibly then make the case that the smaller place is obviously more poorly governed because it's jettisoning people? | ||
| That doesn't make any sense. | ||
| There's certain statistics. | ||
| This is how you play stupid games with statistics. | ||
| Certain statistics ought to be measured per capita. | ||
| Certain statistics ought not be measured per capita, pretty obviously. | ||
| The same thing is true with regard to immigration policy. | ||
| So we got into a tete a tete about ICE and about immigration policy, sanctuary city policy. | ||
| He made the case that sanctuary city policy makes cities safer. | ||
| You can make a case that sanctuary cities policies, they don't additionally add to criminality over baseline. | ||
| You could theoretically make that case. | ||
| I mean, of course, every crime that's then committed by an illegal immigrant in your city, if that illegal immigrant goes there because of the sanctuary city policies, is one more crime than would have otherwise been committed. | ||
| But the case that he was making is that people don't even move into areas because of their sanctuary city policies, which I find hard to believe. | ||
| I find it hard to believe that if you have a choice right now under the Trump administration of moving to a sanctuary city area where the local government will not coordinate with the federal government or moving into a red area where the local government absolutely will coordinate with the federal government, that you're going to be more comfortable moving to that redder area. | ||
| I asked him about California's sanctuary city policies and its sanctuary state policies, actually. | ||
| And he suggested that actually California does a wonderful job of cooperating with ICE, which I think ICE might have some questions about this. | ||
| You're pragmatic. | ||
| You talk about your pragmatism all the time. | ||
| Wouldn't best policy be to cooperate with ICE in the vast majority of cases. | ||
| So instead of ICE going to, as you say, hospitals and churches to pick people up, they'd be going to jailhouses to pick up. | ||
| That's exactly what they do in California. | ||
| And we have over 10,000 that I've cooperated with since I've been governor of California. | ||
| We work very directly with ICE as it relates to CDCR, our state prison. | ||
| California has cooperated with more ICE transfers probably than any other state in the country. | ||
| And I vetoed multiple pieces of legislation that have come from my legislature to stop the ability for the state of California to do that. | ||
| So when it comes to the issues of violent criminals, when it comes to felons, people that are being released from the largest state system in the United States of America, California cooperates with ICE. | ||
| It's true for violent criminals. | ||
| It is not true for people who say, let's say you've avoided 100 traffic tickets, you get arrested. | ||
| You are not then reported to ICE. | ||
| In fact, the law in the state of California is that police are not supposed to question individuals about their immigration status. | ||
| State and local funds cannot be used to investigate, detain, or arrest people for immigration violations because that's federal law. | ||
| And local police are not supposed to proactively share non-public information like home addresses. | ||
| California will not release information about individuals unless they have been convicted of specific violent crimes, which means ICE has to ramp up their own surveillance efforts. | ||
| And certain localities have been made ICE-free zones, which ban ICE from using any city-owned property as staging areas, which means that ICE then has to use private or federal sites only. | ||
| Again, if the goal is to make your state into a sanctuary state, obviously that has some impact. | ||
| Okay, the whole episode, I think, is really interesting. | ||
| Again, credit to Governor Newsom for having me on. | ||
| Credit to him for actually having a pretty open and I would say fairly both cordial and combative conversation about some of the key issues facing the country. | ||
| Now, I've talked about the problems facing the Democratic Party. | ||
| The problems facing the Democratic Party are pretty obvious. | ||
| There's a big divide between their radical base and the moderation they're going to need in order to win. | ||
| Gavin Newsom wants to campaign as the guy who cooperates with ICE, as the guy who wants to be at least moderate on the trans issue, secondary on the trans issue, who wants to be fairly moderate on foreign policy, who does not want to engage in a lot of the same sort of rhetorical radicalism of his own party. | ||
| Will the base allow him to do that? | ||
| I think probably not. | ||
| He's been able to hide it so far by attacking Trump. | ||
| I'm not sure how long that's going to last. | ||
| So that's one problem for him. | ||
| And of course, the other problem is his record in California. | ||
| There are going to be a lot of sort of Willie Horton type ads that come out against Governor Newsom as he runs for the presidency. | ||
| Now, the problem for the Republicans, Gavin Newsom is a very talented guy. | ||
| I don't think there's any doubt when you watch that episode that he is good on his feet, that he is slippery when he needs to be, that he does a convincing imitation of a pro-capitalism moderate, if you think that's an imitation. | ||
| Maybe that's the real Gavin Newsom, and he's had to slather it over with radicalism to get where he wants to go. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't know the answer to that. | ||
| But anybody who thinks that Republicans are going to waltz to 2028, I do not think they will waltz to 2028. | ||
| I don't think Democrats are going to waltz to 2028. | ||
| It's going to be a dogfight. | ||
| And there are problems inside both parties, obviously. | ||
| The Republican Party is pretty divided on some major issues ranging from the involvement of the state in economics to foreign policy. | ||
| The record of whoever is the Republican nominee is going to come up for scrutiny also. | ||
| So here's what I would urge. | ||
| For both parties, maybe you ought to take a look at what the American people want. | ||
| Maybe you ought to take a look at the closeness of every American election for the last 12 years and think to yourself, maybe if I tacked toward the middle, maybe what Americans really just want is normalcy. | ||
| Now, maybe the primary structure prevents normalcy from actually taking the floor. | ||
| But as we are seeing from the polling data, more and more Americans are identifying as independent. | ||
| And the reason for that is because all they want is return to normalcy. | ||
| I think that the reason President Trump won in 2024 is he was by far the most normie candidate by far. | ||
| Joe Biden was not a normie candidate. | ||
| He was dead and he was radical. | ||
| Kamala Harris was not a normie candidate. | ||
| She was an empty suit and she was radical. | ||
| Donald Trump took the middle position on nearly every issue. | ||
| Will Republicans do that or will they be so high on their own supply that they go rhetorically radical over and over and over for no apparent reason while pursuing mainstream policy? | ||
| That's going to be the big battle of 2028. | ||
| Meanwhile, President Trump is threatening to deploy more federal forces to Minneapolis given the amount of unrest over there. | ||
| According to the Washington Post, President Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minnesota on Thursday, raising the prospect of sending U.S. troops into Minneapolis, despite opposition from state and local leaders to quell protests over a recent federal immigration enforcement surge. | ||
| So not just protests, by the way. | ||
| Some of these have involved actually attacking ICE vehicles. | ||
| We had video yesterday on the show of people attempting to break into a gun box that was in the back of an ICE vehicle. | ||
| Meanwhile, Christy Noam at DHS has blamed another Minneapolis shooting on Tim Walz, the governor, and Jacob Fry, the mayor of Minneapolis. | ||
| That shooting, of course, occurred when a person that ICE was trying to take into custody apparently attacked ICE officers along with a couple of others with shovels. | ||
| Here's what she had to say. | ||
| You know, this kind of violence is perpetuated by what we hear the governor saying, what we hear the mayor in Minneapolis saying, and their irresponsibility is extremely reckless. | ||
| Governor Tim Walz has my phone number. | ||
| I have called him and talked to him and said, listen, you let your city burn down in 2020. | ||
| Don't do it again. | ||
| President Trump wants to keep everybody safe. | ||
| We're enforcing federal law. | ||
| We're protecting every single American. | ||
| Work with us. | ||
| I want to remind you that Minneapolis itself, under the mayor's leadership and the governor's leadership, released almost 500 criminals out onto the streets rather than bring them to justice and turn them over to federal authorities. | ||
| They know they're releasing murderers and drug traffickers on the streets of Minneapolis. | ||
| We're out there making sure they don't harm American citizens, and we're getting attacked while we do it. | ||
| But we're going to continue to do our work and do what's right because it's what President Trump promised the American people. | ||
| Now, Noam was asked if the president of the United States would invoke the Insurrection Act. | ||
| She said, I don't know what he's going to do at this point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you think that there needs to be an Insurrection Act invoked? | |
| Oh, I think that the President has that opportunity in the future. | ||
| It's his constitutional right, and it's up to him if he wants to utilize it. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would it lead to more deadly killings in Minnesota if the Insurrection Act is invoked? | |
| If anything doesn't change with Governor Walls, I don't anticipate that the streets will get any safer. | ||
| Democrats in a variety of states are planning to introduce bills allowing residents to sue federal agents for violating their Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. | ||
| According to Fox News, New Jersey Democrats are trying to establish the state as a sanctuary state. | ||
| Governor Walls, for his part in Minnesota, put out a statement: quote, I'm making a direct appeal to the president. | ||
| Let's turn the temperature down, stop this campaign of retribution. | ||
| This is not who we are. | ||
| And an appeal to Minnesotans, I know this is scary. | ||
| We can, we must speak out loudly, urgently, but also peacefully. | ||
| We cannot fan the flames of chaos. | ||
| That's what he wants. | ||
| Noah Rothman has a good piece over at National Review, pointing out the game that Tim Walz is playing. | ||
| Quote, he called on state residents to protest loudly, urgently, but also peacefully, and to peacefully film ICE agents, as though repeating the word peacefully negates the danger that protesters put themselves in when they insert themselves between armed law enforcement officers and their targets of arrest. | ||
| Indeed, he set out to convince the passionate and impressionable they'd been deputized in the campaign of resistance he envisions by the state. | ||
| What Walls is advising his citizens to do is likely to result in more violence and potentially more death. | ||
| That, of course, is exactly right. | ||
| Stephen Miller, the most passionate of the president's senior advisors when it comes to a wide variety of issues, including immigration, told Fox News, what we are watching right now is clearly an insurgency that would require the Insurrection Act. | ||
| You only have to read their own words and hear their own words and judge their own conduct to understand that this is clearly an insurgency against the federal government. | ||
| They are describing the federal government as an occupying force. | ||
| Okay, the ICE chief, Todd Lyons, similarly said, we're not watching peaceful protests in Minnesota anymore. | ||
| Yeah, Martha, without getting too much into the investigation, it was a federal vehicle. | ||
| But just to the point, that is not peaceful protesting. | ||
| That's not what the governor, that's not what the mayor is calling for. | ||
| That's anarchy, plain and simple. | ||
| That's impediment. | ||
| And unfortunately, that's what ICE agents are encountering every day. | ||
| What we really need is elected officials to say, you know, you can peacefully protest, but not like that, not throwing fireworks, not breaking into vehicles, not putting your hands on ICE agents. | ||
| But instead, they just keep increasing the rhetoric. | ||
| And that's why you keep seeing this night after night. | ||
| Lyons said that Democrats are incentivizing this. | ||
| Fortunately, again, you know, I hate to sound like a broken record, but when you have elected officials that are saying, go out and do this, go out and impede ICE, you know, go out and protect your neighbor, and they're doing it like this. | ||
| This is what happens and leads to it. | ||
| And unfortunately, you know, these videos come up and there's only one side to it. | ||
| And we're constantly having to go on the defense. | ||
| But the men and women of ICE are professional. | ||
| They're professional law enforcement officers. | ||
| That's what they're out there doing every day. | ||
| And again, at the end of the day, we have to make sure our men and women of ICE and all law enforcement call them safe every night. | ||
| Again, invoking the Insurrection Act under Section 252, which is presumably the section that the president would invoke, allows the president to enforce the law. | ||
| Basically, if people are stopping the enforcement of the law, you can invoke the Insurrection Act to effectuate the enforcement of that law. | ||
| Meanwhile, over in Iran, the Iranian government is announcing apparently they're going to keep the internet shut until March. | ||
| So, for those who believe that things are going swimmingly in Iran, that now the temperature has been turned down by the Iranian government. | ||
| I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn. | ||
| That is obviously untrue. | ||
| The Iranian government has basically shut down protests by stationing troops pretty much everywhere in the country and threatening to shoot people if they go outside. | ||
| According to the Wall Street Journal, a fierce crackdown by Iranian security forces that has killed thousands of people protesting against the country's autocratic leaders has forced demonstrators off the streets in some cities, with residents reporting an eerie quiet after days of escalating violence. | ||
| Iran's government has blocked the internet and deployed large numbers of police and troops, by the way, including tanks, in an effort to quell the biggest threat to the regime since 1979. | ||
| Iranians said that they were afraid to leave their homes. | ||
| That is why when you hear public officials, President Trump had said the killing has stopped. | ||
| Well, I mean, the killing has stopped because the Iranians literally put out the Revolutionary Guard on street corners and said, if you show up outside your house, we'll kill you. | ||
| Ali Vaez, Iran analyst at the International Crisis Group, said the reason is very clear. | ||
| The regime has created a bloodbath. | ||
| According to human rights activists, which is one of these groups, they say that they've confirmed at least 2,600 deaths and more than 18,000 arrests. | ||
| Estimates have ranged from that range all the way on up to the tens of thousands. | ||
| Unclear at this point what's true and what is not. | ||
| Certainly, at least thousands of people have been murdered at this point. | ||
| The regime has massacred its own people in large numbers. | ||
| The president of the United States, of course, said people should maintain their presence out in the streets, that help was on its way. | ||
| We'll have to see what the president is intending. | ||
| Now, some people are claiming the president is going to do nothing. | ||
| I find that hard to believe. | ||
| He drew a red line. | ||
| That red line has been breached in an extraordinary fashion. | ||
| I think the president wants to do something meaningful. | ||
| He doesn't want to shoot a missile and hit a camel in the ass. | ||
| I think he wants to actually do something meaningful if he's going to do anything at all. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal reports something similar. | ||
| Apparently, President Trump was advised a large-scale strike against Iran was unlikely to make the government fall and could spark a wider conflict. | ||
| And for now, we'll monitor how Tehran handles protesters before deciding on the scope of a potential attack. | ||
| So it's not as though everything is off the table. | ||
| I think the question was one of efficacy. | ||
| If you launch a few airstrikes against random IRGC facilities, does it actually change the regime or allow the protesters to remain out in the streets? | ||
| Or does it simply result in a bit of a firefight in the Middle East and the Iranians continuing to murder people in the streets? | ||
| Advisors told President Trump the United States would need more military firepower in the Middle East, both to launch a large-scale strike and also to protect American forces in the region from retaliatory ballistic missile attack. | ||
| It appears, according to the Wall Street Journal, that a wide variety of regimes in the Middle East, ranging from the Saudis to the Israelis, actually, suggested that a potential strike should not be undertaken until all the pieces are in place. | ||
| So Saudis, Israelis, Qatar, like everyone apparently was saying no for different reasons. | ||
| Qatar doesn't want to strike because they're backed by Iran. | ||
| Saudi apparently doesn't want to strike because they're afraid they're going to get hit by missiles coming the other way and the Americans don't have enough force strength in the region to repel that. | ||
| The Israelis, presumably concerned about the same sort of thing. | ||
| NBC earlier had reported that Trump's advisors couldn't guarantee the Iranian regime would quickly collapse after a U.S. strike. | ||
| Lindsey Graham, who obviously the center from South Carolina, is in close touch with the presidents on this sort of stuff. | ||
| He said, the question is, should it be bigger or smaller? | ||
| I'm in the camp of bigger. | ||
| Time will tell. | ||
| So we'll have to see how things unfold. | ||
| And again, caution does not mean doing nothing. | ||
| Caution is called for, obviously. | ||
| You know, looking at the best available plan and then taking the best available plan is better than doing something precipitous. | ||
| Negotiations are not on the table here. | ||
| So the question is going to be what the actual military measures that could be undertaken would be, or economic measures or cybersecurity measures that could be taken would be to undermine the regime at this point. | ||
| According to the editorial board over at the Wall Street Journal, they say an effective U.S. policy would support Iran's people for as long as it takes for them to overwhelm their regime until it becomes paralyzed, shows cracks in its leadership, and can no longer hold back the crowds. | ||
| So obviously the Iranian people are going to have to do the heavy lifting here. | ||
| But I also do not think that the president is going to repeat Barack Obama's mistake in which he drew a red line in Syria and then did absolutely nothing before handing Syrian control over to the Russians, essentially. | ||
| So we'll see what happens from here. | ||
| Meanwhile, the White House hosted the opposition leader of Venezuela, Maria Cornelo Machado. | ||
| She met with the president. | ||
| She presented him with her Nobel Peace Prize, which he accepted. | ||
| Again, I totally understand the gesture from her. | ||
| She's obviously attempting to change the actual regime in Venezuela, and she's very grateful to the president for having ousted Nicolas Maduro. | ||
| The president taking the Nobel Peace Prize, again, would I do that? | ||
| Would you do that? | ||
| Probably not. | ||
| Trump said on social media, it was my great honor to meet Maria Cordilla Machado of Venezuela today. | ||
| She's a wonderful woman who's been through so much. | ||
| Maria presented me with her Nobel Peace Prize for the work I have done such a wonderful gesture of mutual respect. | ||
| We'll have to see whether the White House is going to put additional pressure on the Venezuelan regime to move toward elections. | ||
| Right now, they're putting pressure on the regime to do what we want, economically speaking. | ||
| The reality is that if the regime doesn't change before President Trump leaves office, there will likely be a reversion to type in Venezuela, meaning I wouldn't count on a Democrat, including Gavin Newsom, to keep the pressure on Venezuela in terms of prohibiting their transfer of oil abroad. | ||
| I think that requires a Trumpian figure in order to actually do that. | ||
| The reason that Trump has not backed Machado at this point is because he doesn't believe that she has the capacity to consolidate power in the country thus far. | ||
| More than half of Venezuelans currently say Machado should lead, as opposed to 14% who endorsed Rodriguez. | ||
| I think the basic idea here is that U.S. officials, according to Axios, see Rodriguez as the best candidate to reform the oil sector and comply with Trump's wishes without alienating regime insiders, the military, and armed gangs, all of whom could take the country into chaos. | ||
| If the U.S. backed her as leader, then the United States might have to engage in a full-scale occupation of Venezuela. | ||
| That presumably would be the concern. | ||
| Joining us on the line is Dr. Mehmet Oz. | ||
| He serves as the 17th administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. | ||
| Dr. Oz, thanks so much for taking the time. | ||
| I really appreciate it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good to see you again, Ben. | |
| So this morning, the Trump administration brought out its new healthcare plan focusing on bringing down costs in the health insurance industry, particularly, but also drug prices, some other areas. | ||
| What are sort of the key points that Americans need to know? | ||
| Ben, this is about putting patients first. | ||
| It's about making sure we put patients in front of profits and other Puritan self-interest that's hindered our healthcare system. | ||
| So we want to slash drug prices. | ||
| We want to bring insurance premiums down. | ||
| We want to make sure that we hold insurance companies accountable. | ||
| And we want the whole system to be transparent. | ||
| Because, Ben, for a marketplace to work, the buyers need to know what they're actually getting. | ||
| What does it cost? | ||
| What's the quality, et cetera? | ||
| So let's walk through these. | ||
| Issue number one, drug prices. | ||
| What we don't want to do is to cap prices, which would drop productivity, reduce the number of innovative solutions that will cure cancer and drive Alzheimer's back and deal with all the crises that hurt the American people. | ||
| Because the number one thing the president has said all along is keep us innovative, keep America on the cutting edge, because he knows that the big opportunity is to get Americans to want to work a little longer because they're so healthy, they're so vital, they're so productive. | ||
| They want to still stay engaged with society. | ||
| So that drives trillions of dollars into the U.S. economy. | ||
| So how do we balance those two needs? | ||
| Keeping America healthy and vital and strong and making sure that we can afford it. | ||
| Well, the president argued that it's feasible because right now he's paid and spend three times more than our European counterparts for the exact same drug, made in the same factory, bottled in the same place, and that doesn't make any sense. | ||
| And so we went to the pharmaceutical companies and said, hey, look, look at me in the eyes. | ||
| We know and you know that you've been getting away with price gouging and global freeloading from other countries as well for the last several decades. | ||
| This president will not tolerate anymore. | ||
| Work with us, be patriots, fix the problem. | ||
| And to the last one, they've all said yes. | ||
| They've come in. | ||
| They've been willing to participate the major companies. | ||
| We haven't gotten to the smaller ones yet. | ||
| And for that reason, we now have a bunch of contracts with pharmaceutical companies where they agree voluntarily to reduce their prices so they're the most favored nation pricing here in America. | ||
| It's fair. | ||
| It works. | ||
| It turns out that these companies have maintained their valuations. | ||
| They haven't been hurt by these deals, even though they've taken significant financial haircuts. | ||
| The president wants Congress to codify what we already believe works. | ||
| We don't want to go any further. | ||
| We don't want to cause any more problems for any pharmaceutical companies, for any parts of these negotiations. | ||
| We just want to grandfather in people who have been there and make sure that going forward in future administrations, the drug companies stay committed to this deal structure and that the U.S. government doesn't overreach its needs and start to do crazy things like cap prices in the pharma space that actually would hurt their innovation. | ||
| So that's the big first step, number one, most favored nation, acronym MFN. | ||
| You'll be hearing that a lot. | ||
| Second big area: how do you make insurance companies accountable? | ||
| Well, first off, the money that they're getting, this is a good example for the Affordable Care Act, as the president calls it, the unaffordable care act, is a problem because they just take the money, their valuations go up. | ||
| The money actually eventually some of it gets down to the people, but premiums still keep rising. | ||
| So the president said, from now on, we want the money going to the people. | ||
| We want to make sure that as much as possible, we drive down prices in the insurance space fairly. | ||
| And there's a way of doing that called cost-sharing reduction. | ||
| It was actually in the One Big Beautiful bill. | ||
| The president put it in there, and yet Democrats stripped it out. | ||
| It's a smart way to run insurance. | ||
| It actually drops the prices for everybody by more than 10%. | ||
| So we want to try and get those elements of the program back into this legislation. | ||
| But we also want insurance companies to tell us how much are you taking home of the premiums and how much are you paying out for the benefits of the average American people? | ||
| What value are you providing? | ||
| How many months do people have to wait to get a simple doctor's appointment? | ||
| Tell us exactly what's going on behind the scenes so you're accountable and so people can pick the best companies out there. | ||
| Because if we're given the average American money in their HSA account or in their pocket to buy insurance, they need to be educated about which ones to pick. | ||
| And finally, Ben, and you're a big proponent about this. | ||
| Just be transparent. | ||
| I mean, shed light. | ||
| What's the first thing we do when you, as a surgeon, when you're called into another operation for a colleague? | ||
| First thing you do is open the wound up and put better light in there so you can see what's going on. | ||
| Like this infects all as well. | ||
| So we need to actually be transparent in what things cost. | ||
| If you are doing business with Medicare and Medicaid, those are the agencies that I regulate. | ||
| We want you to post on the wall, very clean, in plain English, exactly what you're getting. | ||
| What does it cost? | ||
| And what are the other options that you may have as a patient? | ||
| This is all, by the way, stuff that we've been talking about. | ||
| Let's just put it into a law that everyone can, for the foreseeable future, point to and say, because of that, you got to be fair with the American people. | ||
| So, Dr. Oz, I want to ask you a couple of quick questions on each of these areas. | ||
| So, when it comes to lowering the drug prices, for example, obviously the biggest problem we have with drug pricing is that Americans pay a different price than people in other countries are paying. | ||
| And that's because of the collective bargaining in those other countries where governments are basically cramming down their own prices on the drunk companies. | ||
| And then you squeeze the balloon in one area and it inflates in America, essentially, where we pay the remaining sort of market price. | ||
| Is the presumption here that these companies are now going to go back to other countries and say, listen, the American people are not going to foot the bill for this. | ||
| You're going to have to increase the price that you pay in France because we're having to decrease the price that we pay in the United States. | ||
| It's exactly the message we're delivering: no more global freeloading. | ||
| And I'll tell you a specific example where we've already done this: the UK, who may have been the worst offender. | ||
| And just to underline what you're saying, when you get a cutting-edge new drug that saves your life, for example, with a bad cancer in this country, the Europeans don't get it for several years. | ||
| So there's actually a significant delay because they're not willing to pay. | ||
| So we're being very transparent with European leaders and people in those countries that what you think is the best possible medicine really isn't because you're not willing to pay towards the kiddie to save lives. | ||
| Listen, how does NATO work? | ||
| NATO works because everyone empties up money so you can defend the continent of Europe. | ||
| America pays too, by the way. | ||
| But we are asking other countries to chip in. | ||
| Same thing as you have external threats from NATO, we have internal threats from diseases that plague all humanity. | ||
| So why is it that America is footing the bill to develop the drugs? | ||
| So we pay most of the RD expense. | ||
| But then in addition, we're paying three times more, as you point out, for those same products. | ||
| So we're saying to the UK, for example, we just did this deal. | ||
| You need to spend a little bit more of your GDP on medications. | ||
| They've agreed. | ||
| Companies are seeing that there's results here because the president can use tariffs and other tools. | ||
| He can say, listen, you may not care about medication prices. | ||
| You're willing to shove it down the throats of these companies, but we're going to cause other problems for you using the other levers that our economy has. | ||
| So don't hurt us on an area where you should actually be aligned with us by saving American lives. | ||
| And they're going to come on board. | ||
| So, Dr. Oz, when you move to the area of lower insurance premiums, one of the big points here is send the money to the American people, sort of like an HSA, as opposed to sending it directly to the insurance companies. | ||
| The question is that when it comes to the insurance industry, it is the regulations, not necessarily the subsidies. | ||
| The subsidies are results of the regulations. | ||
| The regulations under Obamacare make it so that you can't get certain types of plans. | ||
| They also ensure that there's no upper limit on coverage. | ||
| They also ensure the elimination of quote unquote pre-existing conditions. | ||
| The combination of all that means that insurance companies are no longer insurance companies. | ||
| They're basically health cost providers, meaning that if you walk in and you have stage four cancer, they are expected to cover you and they're going to defray that cost by charging somebody else a higher price. | ||
| And we're making sure that people don't quote unquote escape the system if you're young and you're healthy by forcing them to buy a comprehensive insurance plan they wouldn't otherwise normally buy. | ||
| If I'm 21 years old, I really don't need a comprehensive insurance plan in the same way that I do when I'm 65 years old. | ||
| So how much can we help just by sending people checks directly as opposed to really rewriting the regulatory structures around Obamacare? | ||
| And are there plans to rewrite those regulatory structures? | ||
| It's not an either or, we need to do both. | ||
| You've raised all the issues Republicans have been barking about for the last 15 years. | ||
| We have got to make this real insurance. | ||
| It's a discount card right now. | ||
| And so what you described, for example, are association plans where companies can bond together and say, hey, listen, we got enough purchasing power now. | ||
| So we need a discount. | ||
| We need to have better ways of allowing the private sector to engage Obamacare. | ||
| Let me just highlight something that's underlying this issue you just raised, which is a very important observation. | ||
| When Obamacare was created, it was called an exchange. | ||
| Why was it called an exchange? | ||
| The idea was that half the people at Obamacare would be federally subsidized. | ||
| People don't have means. | ||
| You want to sort of get them as they leave Medicaid and enter the workforce, give them some level of coverage. | ||
| But the other half of the people in these Obamacare ACAs, the Affordable Care Act created entities were supposed to be from the private sector. | ||
| You know, small businesses, mom and pop shops. | ||
| You know, I go in a diner. | ||
| I've got six employees. | ||
| Give me discounted, accessible, affordable insurance, and I'll buy them for my employees because they're working hard. | ||
| I want to be a partner with them. | ||
| So it was supposed to be like that. | ||
| But if the federal government is throwing money at the problem and whatever it takes to buy more and more coverage with rules that don't make sense, as you point out, all of a sudden it's too expensive for that guy who runs a diner. | ||
| So he has to now forego buying health insurance because he couldn't do that and pay his employees a living wage and afford to have his business. | ||
| And so we're actually hurting the people we're trying to help most with this. | ||
| So the things you mentioned have already been discussed. | ||
| We want that ideally to be part of this plan. | ||
| But the president wanted a framework. | ||
| He wanted to architect the ideas that we believe are so fundamental to making healthcare affordable in America that he won't compromise on them. | ||
| Within that framework, to make it work more efficiently, all the things you point out need to be included. | ||
| By the way, the cost sharing reduction that I mentioned is another one of those examples. | ||
| You would never run an insurance company without being able to make sure that people can pay their copay and their minimums and all that stuff. | ||
| And it just helps deal with that in a more sophisticated way than what's going on right now, which is the insurance companies just game the system to drive up prices in one area, which of course, people who know it take advantage of it, people don't get taken advantage of. | ||
| We don't want that in our healthcare. | ||
| When it comes to the transparency point that you're making, obviously one of the great frustrations is you go into the hospital, you get a bill, it's a bajillion dollars for a broken leg for an x-ray or whatever it is. | ||
| And that's not the end price that you end up paying. | ||
| Now, obviously, the insurance companies are part of that bargaining process, but the other part of the process, and maybe the bigger part of the process, is the hospitals and the healthcare providers, because what they are doing is they are negotiating different rates with different insurance companies. | ||
| And so they are very often putting out a price that they know they're never going to get from the insurance company. | ||
| They put that out to you. | ||
| And then it looks like the insurance company covered this gigantic price. | ||
| And so there's this whole game that's being played. | ||
| How much of the focus on transparency should be placed not on the insurance companies, but actually on the healthcare providers themselves? | ||
| Needs to be focused on both. | ||
| As you point out, the game is played in many different ways. | ||
| And the gaming of the system happens in different ways for that reason. | ||
| But remember, the marketplace is not just individuals going to a doctor and deciding which physician is going to give them a better value because it's not just what they charge, but what do they get for that money? | ||
| But right now, you get a discounted insurance policy, but you can't find a doctor. | ||
| That's why you want the transparency to include all the things that you might want to know about. | ||
| But the real market bend is made by commercial employers, right? | ||
| The people buy commercial insurance. | ||
| They're the big companies. | ||
| They have a thousand employees and they want to get the best value for their employees. | ||
| Remember, their most important resource are those people. | ||
| They want them to be healthy. | ||
| They want them thriving. | ||
| They want them at work and happy with what's going on. | ||
| Plus, it's a way of building loyalty within the workplace. | ||
| So they work their tails off to get the best value. | ||
| They have trouble finding the prices. | ||
| We're also, by the way, going to stop down the middlemen who are getting paid an inordinate amount of money just to connect the pharmacy benefits companies into the workplace. | ||
| So there are these brokers that make deals. | ||
| They're working this whole, it's like stockbrokers, right? | ||
| They're behind the scenes making all these deals happen, but you don't know who they are. | ||
| You don't know what they're charging. | ||
| And so we don't want all that. | ||
| We want it to be so obvious what the prices are that you can make the decision as an employer. | ||
| And by doing that, you'll drive value because now you've got two hospitals competing because what does it cost to do a hernia? | ||
| If it's $500 for you and $5,000 for the next guy, or MRI scanner access to a treatment, well, then you're going to make a wise decision. | ||
| But again, you have to create a true marketplace. | ||
| Marketplaces require transparency of pricing. | ||
| I've got to know what I'm buying. | ||
| And whenever you don't know what things cost, there's a reason for it, right? | ||
| If you're not sitting at the table, you're on the menu. | ||
| And that's what's happened to the American consumer. | ||
| Well, that's Dr. Oz over at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. | ||
| The plan is out today. | ||
| You can go access it over at the website at the White House. | ||
| Dr. Oz, really appreciate the time and the insight. | ||
| Bless you. | ||
| Alrighty, coming up, we are going to jump into the Vaunted Ben Shapiro show mailbag, but only if you're a member can you see such things. | ||
| If you're not a member, become a member. | ||
| Use Code Shapiro checkout for two months free on all annual plans. | ||
| Click that link in the description and join us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What was it like, Merlin, to be alone with God? | |
| Is that who you think I was alone with? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Marathon, I knew your father. | |
| I am yet convinced that he was not of this world. | ||
| All men know of the great Talies. | ||
| You are my father. | ||
| Are the gods all for my soul? | ||
| Princess Garris, savior of our people. | ||
| I know what the bull got offered you. | ||
| I was offered the same. | ||
| And there is a new pirate work in the world. | ||
| I've seen it. | ||
| A god who sacrifices what he loves for us. | ||
| We are each given only one life, singer. | ||
| No. | ||
| We're given another. | ||
| I learned of Yezu the Christ, and I have become his follower. | ||
| He's waiting on a miracle, and I think you can give him one. | ||
| Trust in Yezu. | ||
| He is the only hope for men like us. | ||
| Fate of Britain never rests in the hands of the Great Life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great light, great darkness. | |
| Such things mattered to me then. | ||
| What matters to you now, Mistress of Lies? | ||
| You, nephew. | ||
| The sword of the High King. | ||
| How many lives must be lost before you accept the power you were born to wield. | ||
| Still clinging to the promises of a god who has abandoned you. | ||
| I cannot take up that sword again. | ||
| You know what you must do. | ||
| Great life, forgive me. |