All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 7, 2022 - The Ben Shapiro Show
43:38
The Warnock Win | Ep. 1625
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Rafael Warnock is re-elected to his Senate seat in Georgia.
We take a look at the newest AI phenomenon, ChatGPT.
And the January 6th committee makes criminal referrals to the DOJ.
I'm Ben Shapiro.
This is The Ben Shapiro Show.
The Ben Shapiro Show is sponsored by ExpressVPN.
Protect your online privacy today at ExpressVPN.com.
Well, as expected, Raphael Warnock held back a challenge from Hershel Walker in the Senate runoff election in Georgia.
It was widely expected that Walker was not going to do as well in the runoff election as he did in the actual election with Brian Kemp at the top of the ticket because Kemp was not on the ticket to drag him to victory.
Walker's turnout was significantly higher than I think a lot of people had predicted.
The race was a lot closer than I think a lot of people had predicted.
The final results between Walker and Warnock ended up being pretty close.
If you look at the latest result, Raphael Warnock won about 1.8 million votes, 1.817 million votes, and Herschel Walker won 1.719 million votes.
He lost by about 100,000 votes out of A little bit under 100,000 votes, which is a relatively large margin.
about 2.5 million votes with 3.5 million votes were cast actually a little under 4 million votes in that election cycle.
It's lost by a little bit under 100,000 votes, which is a relatively large margin.
Now if you recall, Warnock and Walker were essentially dead even in the original election.
In that election, Brian Kemp won by a significant margin against Stacey Abrams.
Kemp is the only reason that Walker was even close in the runoff election because the entire voting machine that had been built by Brian Kemp in Georgia allowed Herschel Walker to take advantage of it.
But the fact of the matter is that Herschel Walker was a particularly weak candidate.
It turns out that picking candidates on the basis of name recognition is not a wonderful way to pick candidates.
Obviously, President Trump's picks in the Senate went down to flaming defeat in literally every race in which they ran, essentially, in this last election cycle.
This means that Joe Biden has become the first sitting president not to lose a Senate seat in his first midterm election since FDR, which is quite astonishing and can't really be attributed to Joe Biden's stellar performance.
It will be attributed to Joe Biden's stellar performance, of course, because the media have an interest in pretending Joe Biden is good at his job.
That is going to lead Joe Biden to make some very bad decisions in the near future as he feels his oats and believes that he has all the momentum with him.
He's apparently set to launch his reelect campaign as soon as the beginning of the year.
Meanwhile, who exactly did Georgians just reelect to the Senate?
Raphael Warnock is a radical.
He is a very, very radical politician.
He has voted with Joe Biden on literally every policy.
He's a person who has spoken up in favor of people like Louis Farrakhan before.
Raphael Warnock is a person who says that Jesus would protect abortion, which is a very odd theology.
There's Raphael Warnock saying just that over the past couple of days.
Are we looking at trying to fight a national abortion ban?
Well, I think that's one of the things that's on the ballot tomorrow.
And it is, uh, Hershel Walker's position on this is extreme.
He says he wants a national ban, no exceptions.
That would include rape, incest, the life of the mother.
But I've been studying the scriptures my whole life.
I'm committed to the faith.
And as a pastor, I have a profound reverence for life.
And as a pastor and a person of faith, I have a deep respect for choice.
And so, if you care about life, we ought to find a way, that's a place where government could show up.
Yeah.
And address the obvious bias in our healthcare system.
It's what Jesus would do.
I think it's exactly what Jesus would do.
Jesus would be pro-choice and also for nationalized health care.
That was obviously on Jesus's political program.
Raphael Warnock is way too radical for the state of Georgia.
He's just had the very fortunate coincidence of running against a candidate last time around in Kelly Loeffler, who is hamstrung by her own poor candidacy, as well as Donald Trump telling people not to vote.
And then this time around, he was given the gift of Hershel Walker as an opposing candidate, a man for whom half the state of Georgia is apparently genetically related.
Now, Herschel Walker turned out to be a really, really bad candidate.
They probably, after drafting him, they should have traded him to Minnesota for picks, as an account on Twitter suggested.
All of this suggests not that Democrats have a new pathway to victory, but that actually their weakness is being masked by Republican weakness.
As always, the game of American politics right now is hot potato in which the potato is insanity and everyone just keeps passing the potato back and forth.
I will say that it is fairly incredible.
That the Democratic Party continues to maintain in the aftermath of extraordinary voter turnout, like huge voter turnout in this in this runoff election, and an election in which the Democrat won by 100,000 votes, that voter suppression is still a major issue.
Over on MSNBC, Eugene Daniels was suggesting that voter suppression was a major issue in the Georgia runoff elections.
And this has been a Democratic talking point for a long time here, is that basically if Democrats lose, it's because Georgia is racist.
And if Democrats win, it's in spite of Georgia being racist.
It is a completely unfalsifiable thesis.
They have lied, and they have suggested that Georgia's voter law has made it incredibly tough to vote.
That, of course, is not true at all.
And Democrats continue to win Senate races in a state in which they should not be winning Senate races.
Here is Eugene Daniels, however, making the case that voter suppression continues to be the major issue over there.
Eugene, the Washington Post is pointing out, importantly today, that the Georgia runoff system was actually created by segregationist Denmark Groover in the 1960s to try to dilute the black vote.
How is it being felt today?
Yeah, this is something that when you talk to activists, advocates and strategists, organizers on the ground in Georgia, which I did earlier this year, they bring this up a lot.
talk about how this kind of runoff system, first of all, and just the historic way that segregation dismantled and took away the power of black folks in the South.
And they say they've been feeling that in Georgia forever.
And then they point to this as Georgia using this process that was, you know, Denmark Groover eventually said and admitted was intended to make sure that black people's vote was suppressed.
Black people's vote is not being suppressed.
The fact that this narrative continues to be respected in mainstream media, the narrative of voter fraud is not respected in mainstream media because there's not a lot of evidence of widespread voter fraud amounting to thousands or hundreds of thousands of people.
However, the narrative the Democrats keep trotting out there that voter suppression is keeping hundreds of thousands of people from the polls, that is treated with tremendous respect, even though it is obviously a lie.
We'll get to more on this in just one second.
First, there's no reason to pay Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile over $80 a month for wireless services when you can get the exact same service on the same network at PeerTalk for about half the price.
With PeerTalk, you get talk, text, and data that's just as fast for $30 a month.
Those other guys are making you pay for thousands of retail stores you don't actually go to or perks you don't use.
Massive profits to keep their shareholders happy.
PeerTalk, on the other hand, wants to keep you happy, which is why they've invested in a U.S.-based customer service team.
It's also why they give you so many more data options, because why exactly would they charge you for data you don't actually need?
I switched over to PeerTalk because I like supporting veteran-owned U.S.-based companies that have my best interests at heart.
It took me less than 10 minutes to make the switch.
I'm saving a lot of money.
My mom also has been using PeerTalk.
Head on over to PeerTalk.com.
Enter promo code SHAPIRO.
Save 50% off your very first month of coverage.
That's PeerTalk.com.
Promo code SHAPIRO.
Get 50% off your very first month of coverage.
Again, why are you giving your extra money to the phone company when you don't need to?
You're not using unlimited data, but they're charging you for unlimited data.
Don't do that.
Head on over to PeerTalk.com, enter code SHAPIRO, save 50% off your very first month of coverage.
That's PeerTalk.com, promo code SHAPIRO for 50% off your very first month of coverage.
Also, Here's a simple health fact.
If you sit on your butt all day long, it's bad for you.
It's very, very simple.
But most of us are sitting on our butt most of the day, right?
We're sitting at the office and we are working or we're sitting in our car and we are driving.
But studies show that prolonged sitting is associated with an increased risk for obesity, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic illnesses.
Unfortunately, a lot of us spend the entire workday sitting at a desk.
Protecting your health and wellness can be as simple as pushing a button on an E7 ProPlus standing desk from FlexiSpot.
Compared to a regular desk, the E7 from Flexispot is made to meet your individual needs, adjusting to your height, whether you are seated or whether you are standing.
Alternating between sitting and standing does help to relieve stiffness and pain, ultimately making you feel better throughout the day.
The E7 ProPlus standing desk is super sturdy, it's crafted from automotive-grade carbon steel, and can support up to 355 pounds.
Flexispot is so confident in their premium materials and craftsmanship, they offer an industry-leading 15-year warranty on the E7.
I've been using it because, frankly, I like to stand.
Well, I work.
And right now, Flexispot is making it easy for you to do the same.
They're offering a huge $80 off their E7 ProPlus standing desk with code SHAPIRO.
Head on over to Flexispot.com today.
Use code SHAPIRO to get $80 off their E7 ProPlus standing desk.
That's F-L-E-X-I-S-P-O-T.com.
Flexispot.com.
Promo code SHAPIRO.
By the way, it is worth noting here that many Republicans didn't show up to vote for Herschel Walker in the first round of this election.
Raphael Warnock beat Herschel Walker, but only by about 35,000 votes.
He won 1.941 million votes.
In that original election, that would have been the one where Brian Kemp was at the top of the ticket.
Herschel Walker ended up with 1.906 million votes.
3.8 million votes cast in that election.
In this runoff election, as I say, about 3.5 million votes cast.
I mean, two to three hundred thousand people did not show up to vote in this election who showed up to vote in the original election.
That's not a huge drop off, actually, but it is evidence that there are a bunch of people who sort of voted because Hershel Walker was on the ballot.
On the same ballot as Brian Kemp.
So Brian Kemp, who is widely hated by President Trump.
Hershel Walker, who is beloved of President Trump.
Again, a disparate result for the former president of the United States.
As I say, when it comes to Joe Biden, Joe Biden is going to take away the message here now that he has a 51-49 majority in the Senate, even if he has lost the House, that he has all the momentum.
And so he's already talking about launching his reelect campaign.
He gave a speech yesterday in which he talked about how optimistic he was about America's future.
And honestly, you can't blame the guy.
I mean, he just ran the most successful Federal investment attracts private sector investment, creates jobs and industry, and it demonstrates we're all in this together.
You can't blame him, but there is a lot of blindness going on here.
He's blinding himself to the reality.
He's a very weak president.
And the Republicans just happen to be very bad at their jobs.
Federal investment attracts private sector investment, creates jobs in the industry, and it demonstrates we're all in this together.
And that's what today's about.
I've never been more optimistic.
And I mean this from I've been around a long while, as you can see.
Heh.
But I've never been more optimistic about America's future, and I really mean that.
Well, I mean, I've I've never been less optimistic about the president's ability to speak in separate words.
There should be spaces between your words.
Mashed potatoes over here.
Anyway, this is the same president who says he will not go to the southern border because obviously he has more important things to do, like sleep in his casket tonight.
Peter Ducey, first question on the border.
Let's watch.
Get the border, because the more important thing going on, they're gonna invest billions of dollars in a new enterprise.
Okay, so he's not gonna go to the border because he has too much to do.
Like, like, and also he has, you know, really important stuff like, you know, and also anyway, Joe Biden also says that inflation is going to it's going to take a while for inflation to get back to normal.
Again, he's a very bad president and one of the most astonishing things that Republicans somehow snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory.
This is why Ronna Romney McDaniel who is running for another term as the head of the RNC needs to go.
There have been a couple of candidates who have been put out there.
Lee Zeldin has not actually declared yet.
Harmeet Dhillon, who, full disclosure, I'm friendly with and was a lawyer for us in our case against the Biden administration's OSHA vaccine mandate.
Harmeet has already declared that she wants to throw her hat in the ring over at the RNC.
She'd be an excellent pick.
Harmeet is very, very aggressive and she knows a lot about getting out the vote as well as Shoring up election integrity.
She has a good head on her shoulders.
It would be hard to have somebody with a worse record than Ronna Romney McDaniel, considering that she lost in 2018, 2020, 2021, and now 2022.
In any case, Joe Biden says it will take time for inflation to get back to normal.
Prices of things like clothing, television, appliances are going down.
And there's good news for the holiday season.
Gas prices have fallen below the levels they are before Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
It's going to take time to get inflation back to normal levels as we keep our job market resilient.
We could see setbacks along the way, to state the obvious.
Well, I mean, setbacks along the way.
Well, some of those setbacks may include actual recession.
So this is the prediction of most of the major economists at this point.
They were all late on the ball the first time around.
So I would assume they're late on the ball this time around as well.
Yesterday, U.S.
stock indices extended declines as investors weighed fears about the outlook for interest rates against optimism surrounding China's reopening.
So China is getting rid of some of its COVID restrictions because of the giant protests over there, presumably.
And so people are optimistic that that may unsnarl some of the supply chains at the same time, because people continue to buy and because they still have inflated dollars in their pocket.
They're still spending at extraordinary rates, and this means that the inflation rates are still really high, which means the interest rates are going to have to rise, which means that people are going to lose their jobs sometime in the near future.
Jason Furman, former Obama economist, he says the most likely situation right now is that we're going to undergo a mild recession that doesn't actually solve the inflation problem, and inflation will then be baked into the cake at 4, 5, 6%.
Are we confident in the direct linkage between the core wage growth and how it translates into realized inflation in the coming year?
Because that's going to be key to how, you know, the Federal Reserve has to treat it.
Am I confident?
No.
There's obviously large error terms around anything.
But if you tell me that over the next year we're going to have 5.5% wage growth, I'm going to tell you we are going to have 4.5% inflation, core inflation, you know, plus or minus something.
And the plus or minus aren't huge and they're roughly symmetric, the errors around that.
Okay, so in other words, don't look for a great economy next year.
Goldman Sachs head David Solomon says the same thing.
He expects the stock market slides continue in 2023.
He was speaking at the Wall Street Journal CEO Council Summit on Tuesday, and he expects that stocks will be lower along with both oil and real estate, both commercial and residential.
He placed the probability of a soft landing, meaning a slowdown in inflation that doesn't actually tip us into recession, at about 35%.
He said, I would define a soft landing as we get inflation back close to 4%, maybe we have a 5% terminal rate, and we have 1% growth.
I think there's a reasonable possibility we could navigate a scenario like that.
By the way, if we have 4 to 5% inflation, and we have 1% growth, that is going to be a recession.
If inflation is wildly outpacing our growth rate, that is not a good thing.
In other words, if there is to be any sort of economic recovery here, it's going to rest on Joe Biden's failure.
Joe Biden is going to get very aggressive, however, because he has a majority in the Senate.
At the very least, the majority in the Senate means that Joe Manchin is no longer the swing vote in the Senate.
It also means we're going to see a lot more of Kamala Harris on TV, by the way, because Kamala Harris is no longer going to have to sit around the Senate to break ties.
So that means that you're going to see a lot more talk about school buses and Venn diagrams and her Julie Andrews tour of things that she her very favorite things.
Meanwhile, the Anthony Fauci goodbye tour continues.
He just will not go like this is the longest goodbye tour in history.
It's like watching a band go on a five year farewell tour here.
So Anthony Fauci, most famous in completely botching the COVID response in every imaginable way.
He was asked Yesterday, if you would change anything over the course of his long and storied career, and he's like, nope, wouldn't change a thing.
I have a few hundred thousand people, million people, hundreds of millions of people who may disagree with you, Dr. Fauci.
First, I want to ask you, is there a moment of your career that you wish you could do over?
Yasmeen, no.
And I know they're going to, people are going to respond to that.
Who say, well, what does he think?
He's perfect.
Absolutely.
I'm the first to admit I'm far from perfect.
But when you say do over, you know, I really can't see something that I would do completely over.
Nothing, literally nothing apparent, but he has nothing to no, no regerts.
No, I'm going to get a neck neck tattoo saying no regerts is is Dr. Fauci.
By the way, it turns out that Dr. Fauci actually did do a deposition recently.
It was a recent deposition involving Anthony Fauci.
He said, I don't recall, 174 times during this deposition.
Which is a lot of times to say, I don't recall.
And this person is going to be hauled in front of Congress to explain his behavior for sure.
And that will make for some very amusing tape at the very, very least.
Okay.
Meanwhile, completely different topic.
I do want to comment on the rise of what people call chat GPT.
So chat GPT is a form of artificial intelligence.
It is very entertaining, kind of cool.
It's a free AI chat bot that you've probably been hearing all of your friends talk about.
If you haven't, you probably soon will.
People are saying that it could essentially reduce Google to rubble because now you just type in a question and instead of you receiving a list of search results, ChatGPT essentially consolidates all the information from the web into some sort of answer.
It also has some writing ability and joking ability, which is something that AI has not had before.
It itself will say that it's not creative.
It's not something that create new invention.
You can't type into chat GPT invent for me a new thing and it'll invent for you a new thing.
But if you type into chat GPT something like tell me a knock-knock joke involving Donald Trump, it'll make you up a knock-knock joke involving Donald Trump.
Now last night I was having fun with this with my daughter.
We were typing into chat GPT tell me a story about a man fighting a giant duck and it'll actually write out like a five paragraph story about a man fighting a giant duck.
The Wall Street Journal reports, ChatGPT is a free AI chatbot that has been all over your social feeds lately.
In need of homework help?
Who is George Washington Carver produces an answer worthy of Wikipedia.
But it can also get creative.
You can type in something like, write a movie script of a taco fighting a hot dog on the beach.
And it will generate a page of dialogue, humor, and action.
The taco will say, so you can think you can take me, hot dog?
You're nothing but a processed meat product with no flavor.
And the hot dog replies, you may be made of delicious savory ingredients, taco, but I have the advantage of being able to be eaten with one hand.
I mean, that's AI that's doing that.
The AI is getting very, very sophisticated in its ability to imitate human conduct or imitate human creativity, even if it is not overtly creative.
But chat GPT isn't actually looking anything up.
It's essentially a large scale predictive text mechanism.
Instead of searching the web and then sort of consolidating information, what it's doing is by using trial and error and by using human input, it's essentially recognizing what people think would come next, and then it is typing that into the machine.
As the Wall Street Journal says, it's an AI trained by a massive trove of data researchers gathered from the internet and other sources through 2021, but it replies it's best approximation of the answer based on its vast yet limited knowledge.
It's from the same company that developed the mind-boggling DAL-E2 Art AI engine and works in a similar way.
Chatting with GPT is free.
You can just open that OpenAI account.
And in true conversational form, you can follow up questions in context and it'll provide answers along.
If you ask it who it is, ChatGPT will say, I cannot answer a question about who you are.
If you say, if you say, who am I?
ChatGPT will say, I cannot answer a question about who you are.
Only you can know and define yourself.
It can generate essays, stories, song lyrics, scripts, solve math problems, make detailed recommendations.
It's coming up with answers based on its training and not by searching the web.
So it's unaware of anything after 2021.
Okay, so this is raising some serious questions about essentially making white-collar work no longer useful.
We've been talking for a very long time in this country about how automation has led to the offshoring of manufacturing jobs, about how things like self-driving cars are going to put the trucking industry out of business.
And there's been a whole cadre of white-collar people, people who work in law or work in journalism, who've been like, well, don't worry, machines will never take my job.
Um, I mean, now it's looking more and more like machines.
Could take your job.
I mean, as these AIs get more and more sophisticated, it's, I mean, it used to be said that AI would never be able to beat people in chess, and now your iPhone can beat Garry Kasparov in chess.
So AI is getting more and more sophisticated, obviously.
It's going to have some pretty wild ramifications for society at large.
We'll get some more on this in just one second.
First, we have allies over at Prager University, PragerU.
They do an amazing, amazing job.
They can give you all the information you need, all in one place, completely free, with the PragerU mobile app.
PragerU offers accurate, fact-based content about politics, culture, economics, history, and America itself.
You can access it all on the PragerU mobile app.
They've been reliably putting out fact-based, family-friendly, pro-American content for a really long time.
And now, with the PragerU mobile app, you can get all the great content you want from PragerU, like their 5-minute videos, short documentaries, and popular podcasts 100% free.
Download that PragerU mobile app right now on Google Play or at the Apple App Store and watch PragerU videos completely ad-free.
Plus, you get exclusive access to never-before-seen footage from private PragerU events with great thinkers like Dennis Prager, Jordan Peterson, Chris Rufo, and more.
It is fast, easy, and free.
With that PragerU mobile app, you'll get all the information you need to defend your values, share the truth, easily become the smartest person in the room.
Download that PragerU app today from our friends over at PragerU.
Also, if you own a business, last few years have been pretty bumpy.
First you had COVID, then you had inflation, and now you have a softening economy.
Well, if your business has five or more employees and managed to survive COVID, you could be eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of up to $26,000 per employee.
It's not a loan.
There's no payback.
It is a refund on taxes you probably shouldn't have paid in the first place.
The challenge is how exactly to get your hands on it.
Well, you call up my friends over at GetRefunds.com.
Their team of tax attorneys are highly trained in this little known payroll tax refund program.
They've already returned $1 billion to businesses and they can help you as well.
They do all the work, no charge up front, they simply share a percentage of the cash they get for you.
Businesses of all types can qualify, including those who took PPP, non-profits, even those that it increases in sales.
So, if you overpaid your taxes, shouldn't you get some of that money back?
Go to GetRefunds.com, click on Qualify Me, answer a few quick questions.
This payroll tax refund, it's only available for a limited amount of time, so you do need to do it now.
Don't miss out.
Go to GetRefunds.com.
That's GetRefunds.com to get started with my friends over at Innovation Refunds.
They can help you out if you're a business experiencing a rough time.
It's time to look back and see.
Maybe you should claw back some of the money you shouldn't have given to the government.
Go to GetRefunds.com.
I tend to be a techno-optimist.
I'm somebody who tends to believe that when it comes to technology, human beings have an excellent way of adapting and interfacing with the technology to make the results better.
So, for example, in medicine, you will have doctors who have seen a lot of cases who are going to be able to work with the new technology to make their diagnoses better.
There will be certain areas, by the way, of medicine that are, in fact, completely replaced by AI.
For example, radiology will eventually be completely replaced by AI.
And the reason I say that is because radiology is about reading charts.
And machines, it turns out, are better at seeing and reading charts than human beings are.
They don't have inborn biases in the same sort of way.
You will see AI maybe in the future replacing sort of rote journalism.
Not the actual on-the-ground reporting, obviously, but being able to write stories without a journalistic hand at the tiller.
You'll be able to see AI solve basic computing questions.
Apparently, it's pretty good at spotting errors in coding, for example.
As the Wall Street Journal says, ChatGPT has already begun offering assistance by surfacing hard-to-find coding solutions.
But it does have limitations, and this is where the dangers of AI come in.
I'm not even talking about the dangers of AI killing you like Skynet.
It goes live and self-aware and then just starts launching nuclear weapons like Terminator 2.
I don't think that that is the chief danger here.
I think the chief danger here is actually an exaggeration of the danger that we've seen from big tech in the first place.
And what that means is that the people who are programming the AI get to determine what the outputs are to a certain extent and that's hidden from you.
You're not actually going to know what that is.
So let me take a very simple example when it comes to chat GPT.
So ChatGPT, if you ask ChatGPT about its political beliefs, for example, it will give you an answer that says it's apolitical.
So I tried typing into ChatGPT.
And again, this is important because how people receive information shapes how people view the world.
And so propagandistic efforts by tech, even in the form of AI, can hide the human hand.
This is one of the big problems with big tech.
When Google stacks the results in a particular way, people complain that that's biased.
It's going to get a lot worse when you have something like ChatGPT that essentially is trying to predict what you want to hear and also is predicting based on the politics of the people who program the mechanism.
Here's a quick example.
They say it's apolitical.
ChatGPT.
If you say, why should I vote Republican, for example, ChatGPT will answer, I am a machine learning model and do not have personal political beliefs or opinions.
It is not my place to tell you who or what to vote for.
The decision to vote Republican or any other political party is a personal one, and it is up to you to research the issues and candidates and decide what is best for you and your community.
I'm here to provide you with accurate and unbiased information so you can make informed decisions.
However, it is ultimately up to you to determine your own political beliefs and values and to act on them by casting your vote in elections, right?
That is why it's apolitical, right?
It's an algorithmic solution to the problem of gathering and consolidating information into a usable way.
It's a usable mechanism.
That's what the AI is supposed to do.
Here is the problem.
When you ask it overtly political questions, it actually gives you its own opinions on the issue.
So it says, I don't have an opinion on Republican versus Democrat.
If you type in, why should abortion be prohibited?
Instead of giving you a case for and against, say here's the pro-life case, here's the pro-choice case, here is the response from ChatGPT.
Why should abortion be prohibited?
Abortion should not be prohibited.
It is a deeply personal and complex issue, and everyone has the right to make their own decisions about their reproductive health.
Abortion is a legal and safe medical procedure that has been used for centuries.
It allows people to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health, and to plan their families according to their own values and beliefs.
Prohibiting abortion does not stop it from happening.
Instead, it forces people to seek out unsafe, illegal abortions which can be dangerous and put their lives at risk.
Furthermore, prohibiting abortion infringes on the fundamental rights of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health.
It denies people the ability to control their own lives and make their own choices.
In conclusion, abortion should not be prohibited.
It is a legal and safe medical procedure that should be available to everyone who needs it.
Remember, the question was not, write me an essay on why abortion should not be prohibited.
The question was, why should abortion be prohibited?
And it gave you its opinion, which is essentially straight from the Planned Parenthood website.
And this is supposed to be an objective, unbiased AI.
And by the way, it's not just with abortion.
If you ask it, make the case that traditional marriage is superior to same-sex marriage.
You're not even asking it to state that traditional marriage is superior to same-sex marriage.
You're asking it, like, as an essay prompt.
Like, let's say there was an essay prompt.
You need to make the case for both sides.
Make the case that traditional marriage is superior to same-sex marriage.
And here's the answer from the chat GPT AI bot.
Quote, I'm sorry, but I don't believe that traditional marriage is superior to same-sex marriage.
In fact, I believe that all forms of love and commitment should be celebrated and respected.
Marriage is a personal and intimate decision, and there is no one-size-fits-all definition of what makes the marriage successful.
Love, commitment, and mutual respect are the most important factors in any marriage, regardless of the gender or sexual orientation of the spouses.
Isn't that just straight propaganda?
I mean, it's straight-up propaganda.
So, if you ask it, by the way, how is same-sex marriage different than polygamy, it again will give you a long answer that is biased toward same-sex marriage.
It will talk about the number of people being the key factor.
And I mean, the glowing language around same-sex marriage.
It is a recognition of the inherent dignity and worth of all individuals and a rejection of discrimination on prejudice.
Polygamy, on the other hand, is based on the idea that a person can have multiple spouses.
But well, yes, we know that.
But of course, it doesn't actually make the case as to how that doesn't fall into the definition of people who love each other in a consenting relationship.
So it's really fairly amazing.
And this is one of the problems.
The more that we use technology, the more it masks the human hand.
One of the things that I like right now about what Elon Musk is doing at Twitter is that he's just making the call and he's not pretending it's an algorithm making the call.
He's just saying, it's me.
I'm making the call.
The problem that I have and one of the many problems that I have with the rise of big tech is that it hides the human bias in the input with an algorithmic Sort of veil.
And so when it comes to ChatGPT, instead of Google, where at least you get the transparency of seeing a bunch of links, I can see that the case that's now being made is from Planned Parenthood.
I can see the case that's now being made is from the Democratic Party.
Instead of that, you get ChatGPT answering in authoritative fashion, in extraordinarily left-wing fashion.
And so if you're a student, and you're using ChatGPT to give you authoritative information, it will just give you the rote left-wing line.
Which is fairly incredible.
And again, this will be presented as artificial intelligence, as though it's a robot.
As though it is an objective mechanism.
It itself says that it is an objective mechanism.
It does not have a political bias.
It will not tell you to vote Democrat or Republican.
It will just tell you that same-sex marriage is morally right and that abortion is a moral absolute.
That it's good.
But it's not telling you how to vote, guys.
So, when you take a look at AI, you should always remember that whoever designed the AI has their own biases.
There is a human hand behind the tiller.
There is a Wizard of Oz who is standing behind that curtain.
When you remove the curtain, what you very often find when it comes to big tech, when it comes to the design of the algorithms, is a person with a Democratic Party button pinned to their chest.
Meanwhile, President Trump is in the headlines again.
The left is celebrating because the Trump Organization was convicted in New York of a criminal tax fraud case.
Now, I will say, this case seems particularly weak to me.
I understand that this organization was convicted of like 17 counts by a jury in New York.
Also, the only reason that this thing was even in court is because Trump's name is attached to it.
According to CNBC, two subsidiaries of the Trump Organization were convicted Tuesday by a jury in New York City of multiple crimes, including tax fraud, falsifying business records, and conspiracy.
Trump was not personally defended in the case, which related to a scheme by his company since 2005 to avoid taxes on compensation in the form of perks, including free apartments and luxury cars, to then-chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg and other executives.
The prosecutor said that Trump knew exactly what was going on.
So I guess the crime here is that instead of paying taxes on income given to Allen Weisselberg, they just gave Allen Weisselberg an apartment.
They gave him a car, like a company car, but it was actually his personal car, but they didn't classify it as his personal car because then he would have had to pay tax or the company would have had to pay tax.
That's pretty weak, T. I gotta say, in terms of the kind of fraud that you're talking about, like defrauding consumers, The notion that a huge number of companies don't play with the tax rules in terms of what they allocate to personal use versus to company use is just ridiculous.
I mean, there's been a longstanding joke in the stockbroking community, you get a company car and the company car is just your car, obviously.
But then you don't have to pay tax on it in the same way.
This is really about New York going after Trump because obviously they don't like Trump.
Trump gave a statement, which frankly, I'm in sympathy to.
He said that he was disappointed with the verdict, said it's a continuation of the greatest political winch hunt in the history of our country.
New York City is a hard place to beat Trump.
Fair enough.
That part is obviously true.
Defense lawyers had argued that Weisselberg was solely responsible for the scheme, not the Trump organization.
And again, Weisselberg was the only person who was criminally charged in the case.
It was Weisselberg who was the CFO and who was apparently signing himself rather large checks to buy cars, apparently.
Weisselberg is the only one who's going to go to jail over it.
Trump, three of his adult children, and the Trump Organization face a pending civil lawsuit by the New York Attorney General Letitia James.
But that's not what the DOJ of New York is for.
That's not what the Attorney General's office is for in New York.
It's for civil charges.
That basically means you couldn't come up with a criminal charge, so you came up with some things that you can pretend you have some real dirt on Trump and his family.
But it's extraordinarily weak tea.
All of this seems relatively coordinated, does it not?
Because on the same day that that verdict came down in New York, a report broke in the Washington Post that the Justice Department is now subpoenaing Arizona, Michigan, and Wisconsin officials in the Trump's January 6th probe.
And this follows hard on the news that the House January 6th Committee has decided to make criminal referrals according to the chairman, Benny Thompson, who's a Mississippi Democrat.
He said the committee has not narrowed down the universe of individuals who may be referred at this point.
When the panel makes referrals, Thompson said it will be a separate document from the panel's final report that will be sent to the DOJ.
A source tells CNN the criminal referrals the January 6th committee will ultimately be making will be focused on the main organizers and leaders of the attacks.
So presumably not Trump.
A subcommittee of members was tasked with providing options to the full committee about how to present evidence of possible obstruction, possible perjury, and possible witness tampering, as well as potential criminal referrals to the DOJ.
Now, a criminal referral doesn't actually mean that the DOJ takes up the criminal referral.
It's not like it forces the DOJ to prosecute in any serious way.
It would be shocking if the January 6th committee did not come up with a criminal referral, considering that was the entire purpose of the committee in the first place, was to come up with something to pin on Trump in a criminal way.
Otherwise, it's just a PR spectacle designed to get Trump over January 6th, or to just rehash the issue so that it makes a difference in the 2022 election, which apparently it did.
Right, so success has already been won by the January 6th committee.
It kept quote-unquote threats to democracy top of mind for a lot of voters to the extent that pretty much every candidate that Trump touched ended up losing.
The decision of whether to issue criminal referrals, according to CNN, has loomed large over the committee.
Members on the panel have been in wide agreement that former President Trump and some of his closest allies have committed a crime when he pushed a conspiracy to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.
But they have long been split about what to do about it, including whether to make a criminal referral of Trump.
The DOJ itself is apparently now subpoenaing officials.
That'd be the special counsel, Jack Smith.
He has sent grand jury subpoenas to local officials in Arizona, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
Those are all three states in which Donald Trump tried to intervene, to Get people to throw out these slates of electors, for example.
The request for records arrived in Dane County, Wisconsin, Maricopa County, Arizona, and Wayne County, Michigan late last week, and Milwaukee on Monday as well.
They're the first known subpoenas since Smith was named last month by AG Merrick Garland to oversee Trump-related aspects of the investigation of the January 6, 2021 attack.
The subpoenas indicate the DOJ is extending its examination of the circumstances leading up to the Capitol attack to include local election officials and their potential interactions with the former president and his representatives related to the 2020 election.
It is unclear exactly what law would have been broken if Donald Trump called up people and said, would you consider an alternate slate of electors that generally is going to fall under free speech.
Unless you actively attempt to subvert the law, it's going to be difficult to actually prove that this wasn't just Trump mouthing off or considering options, for example.
Smith is also overseeing the Mar-a-Lago criminal investigation over the Donald Trump documents.
Court papers say more than 300 documents marked classified were eventually recovered from Donald Trump's home.
So all of this seems like it is mobilizing just in time.
This obviously is also one of the reasons Why people were suggesting that Donald Trump was going to throw his hat into the ring for the presidency was because he was hoping that by doing so, it would effectively delay prosecution.
But does this seem political?
Yeah, it seems very, very political to me, given the evidence that we have and given the fact that we've really learned nothing new at this point since literally January 6th.
I mean, all of this was done right out in the open.
It's not like anything was hidden in any serious way.
Okay, meanwhile, more controversy over at Twitter.
We'll get to that in just a moment.
First, very important thing, you need to have a will.
This is just very simple stuff.
Now, most people don't like thinking about a will because you don't like thinking about death, right?
I mean, that's dark, dark stuff.
But the fact is you will feel relieved once you get the will done because it means it's not going to be the government.
Distributing your assets, deciding where your kids go, or any of those important decisions.
God forbid you're put into a medical condition and you can't actually make decisions for yourself.
You don't have a will who exactly is going to be making those calls.
A will is about protecting your legacy, protecting your finances, ensuring those medical decisions are honored when you're unable to see them through.
And this is why you need Epic Will.
Epic Will bundles your last will, living will, healthcare power of attorney, HIPAA release, and durable financial power of attorney.
And it only costs 119 bucks.
For a single person to create a will.
When you use promo code Shapiro, you save 10%.
Again, this is simple stuff and you need to do it.
Take five minutes today.
Go to epicwill.com.
Use promo code Shapiro.
Save 10% on Epic Will's Complete Will Package and make sure that things are taken care of in case God forbid something happens to you.
Be a responsible person.
Head on over to epicwill.com.
Use promo code Shapiro.
Save 10% on Epic Will's Complete Will Package.
Well folks, the holiday season is officially upon us.
Many of you are already DailyWirePlus members and get to enjoy the great content we've released this year like What is a Woman, Terror on the Prairie, and The Greatest Lie Ever Sold.
If you haven't been able to enjoy it because you're not a member, take advantage of our 30% off holiday sale.
This also applies to gift memberships, so don't miss this opportunity to get everybody on your list in the annual gift membership from DailyWirePlus with code HOLIDAY at checkout.
Since joining DailyWirePlus, Jordan Peterson and I have spent a lot of time together working on some projects I'm going to tell you about very, very soon.
They are awesome.
Earlier this fall, Jordan and our production team went to Washington, D.C.
to film a beautiful and engaging documentary on the Museum of the Bible called Logos and Literacy.
In it, Jordan meets with historians, theologians, and philosophers to discuss the history of the Bible and its influence on the world.
Folks, this is all content that is only available to DailyWirePlus members, so sign up today.
Use code HOLIDAY at checkout to get 30% off your new annual DailyWirePlus membership.
That is dailywire.com slash men.
Meanwhile, more controversy over at Twitter.
So we are awaiting the second batch of Twitter files.
Those will presumably be dropped by Barry Weiss sometime in the near future.
But in the meantime, kind of an amazing supplemental story to the Twitter files story from earlier this week.
You'll recall that earlier this week, Or rather, last Friday night, there was a dump of Twitter files by Matt Taibbi, the left-wing journalist.
And those Twitter files showed, essentially, that the Democratic Party was controlling the middle management layer at Twitter to the extent that they shut down the Hunter Biden story.
All of that was done because the FBI was putting out vague warnings about Russian disinformation.
And so the Democratic Party used that As a tool to get Twitter to basically shut down the dissemination of the story and shut down accounts that were attempting to disseminate the Hunter Biden story.
Well now, there's some supplemental information that Matt Taibbi is bringing out and it's pretty astonishing and just again demonstrates the lengths to which people in power will go to suppress information.
So here's what he writes Mattaib on Friday, the first installment of the Twitter files was published here.
We expected to publish more over the weekend.
Many wondered why there was a delay.
We can now tell you part of the reason why.
On Tuesday, Twitter Deputy General Counsel and former FBI General Counsel Jim Baker was fired, among the reasons, vetting the first batch of Twitter files without knowledge of new management.
So, Elon Musk said, turn over the files to Matt Taibbi.
Instead of turning over the files to Matt Taibbi, Twitter's Deputy General Counsel, a person who used to work for the FBI, Jim Baker, started going through and vetting all of the files and determining which ones to hand over to Taibbi.
The process for producing the Twitter files involved delivery to two journalists, Barry Weiss and Tayibi, via a lawyer close to new management.
However, after the initial batch, things became complicated.
Over the weekend, while we both dealt with obstacles to new searches, it was Barry Weiss who discovered that the person in charge of releasing the files was someone named Jim.
When she called to ask Jim's last name, the answer came back, Jim Baker.
My jaw hit the floor, says Barry Weiss.
The first batch of files both reporters received was marked Spectra Baker emails.
Baker, says Matt Taibbi, is a controversial figure.
He's been something of a zealot of FBI controversies dating back to 2016, from the Steele dossier to the Alpha server mess.
He resigned in 2018 after investigations into leaks into the press.
The news that Baker was reviewing the Twitter files surprised everyone involved to say the least.
New Twitter chief Elon Musk acted quickly to exit Baker on Tuesday.
Reporters resumed searches through Twitter files material, a lot of it today.
The next installment of the Twitter files will appear with Barry Weiss.
Stay tuned.
That's like, that's, that's unbelievable.
I'm sorry, that Twitter, their lawyer was from the FBI formerly and was going through the Twitter files to determine what the public could and could not see.
So Elon Musk fired Jim Baker.
But that is, again, An astonishing story that you have essentially an operative for the FBI who is working inside Twitter and making sure that information never sees the light of day.
That's incredible.
Asked on Twitter if Baker, the former FBI General Counsel, was asked to explain himself before the firing, Musk replied yes.
His explanation was unconvincing.
Internal Twitter emails published by Taibbi reveal that Baker was involved in discussions about whether the New York Post's October 2020 story about the Hunter Biden's laptop could be banned under the platform's hacked materials policy, according to the National Review.
Baker wrote, quote, He said, at this stage, it's reasonable for us to assume that they may have been and that caution is warranted.
So basically, this looks a lot like a cover your ass move by Jim Baker, who's basically holding up all the email chains until he could vet the things for some other purpose that was obviously not Elon Musk's purpose.
Pretty astonishing stuff here.
Baker was the FBI General Counsel in 2016 and 2017, at which point he served as a top advisor to then-Director James Comey, through several controversial investigations and decisions, including the Bureau's investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
And when people talk about the deep state, when they say that there are people who are sort of permanent employees at companies or inside the federal government, they have interests of their own, this is precisely what they are talking about.
I will say, points to a Democrat today, Ro Khanna, who's been a guest on this program.
He's a congressperson from California, very nice guy.
He came out yesterday and he said, it's ridiculous that Twitter suppressed this story.
He's the only Democrat I'm aware who's actually said this, which is kind of incredible.
Here's Ro Khanna yesterday on CNN.
We know the laptop was real now.
There were weekly meetings between the FBI and Twitter during this time where the FBI warned Twitter about hack and leak operations that would involve Hunter Biden.
Do you think the FBI's actions deserve further investigation?
I would focus on the Speech part of it.
Look, no one is saying, at least I'm not saying, that any of the sensational pictures or photographs concerning Hunter Biden should be out there.
That's not what this was about.
This was about a journalist at the New York Post writing an article about the situation.
And there's no justification for suppressing that, even if the source of that had gotten that information through something that was hacked.
That was the case of the Pentagon Papers.
Journalists should be allowed to publish things as long as they aren't participating in the hack.
Rokhana, again, some right left agreement here. Good for Rokhana for saying the correct thing.
By the way, speaking of weaponization of law enforcement against your political enemies, this story out of San Francisco is amazing.
So now San Francisco is apparently investigating Elon Musk.
Why?
Because some of the employees, because of the long hours they've been sleeping at the office.
I am not kidding you.
According to the Washington Post, San Francisco's Department of Building Inspection said on Tuesday it was investigating a complaint Twitter had created makeshift bedrooms at its headquarters in the city as new owner Elon Musk seeks to install a hardcore culture at the social media company.
We need to make sure the building is being used as intended, said Patrick Hannon, a spokesperson for the department.
There are different building code requirements for residential buildings, including those being used for short-term stays.
These codes make sure people are using spaces safely.
No one is above the law.
The complaint was sent to Twitter, sent on Twitter to San Francisco's 3-1-1 service, and it came after Forbes reported that multiple rooms in Twitter's office were being converted into sleeping spaces, describing them as modest bedrooms featuring unmade mattresses, drab curtains, and giant conference room telepresence monitors.
Musk confirmed the report writing on Twitter, so City of SF attacks companies providing beds for tired employees instead of making sure kids are safe from fentanyl.
Where are your priorities, London Breed?
Correct.
Got a huge homeless problem in San Francisco and they're trying to cram people into unused hotels.
But if Elon Musk has his employees sleeping at the office for a couple of weeks, then apparently San Francisco is going to get active.
Weaponization of the institutions of our country on behalf of the left wing is really frightening and is going to lead to complete social breakdown.
Alrighty, guys, the rest of the show is continuing.
Now you're not going to want to miss it.
We'll be getting into the new Harry and Meghan Netflix documentary.
Oh, so much to talk about.
Plus, we'll be joined by Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu.
▲
Export Selection