It's the end of the world as conservatives know it, and Ben doesn't feel fine, plus why Kid President is the most annoying crap on the planet.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
As is my custom at the beginning of a new week, I like to preface everything with the statement, I hate everyone and everything.
Because that's where we are right now.
Donald Trump wins South Carolina and it's becoming a constant refrain that things keep happening on Saturdays.
While I'm enjoying my Sabbath, I'll have a nice relaxed Sabbath.
Sabbath will end, I'll come back online and the world is completely on fire.
I'll come back online and it feels like Lex Luthor has succeeded in destroying the San Andreas Fault And Lois Lane is being sucked down into the chasm.
It's just, it's so bad.
So I come back, and Trump has won the South Carolina primaries, I think 32, and then it was 22 for Cruz and Rubio.
I said on Friday, at Daily Wire anyway.
And I maybe even said it on Thursday on the show, that the worst case outcome was exactly this.
And at this point I'm gonna stop using the phrase worst case outcome, because there's apparently always an outcome worse than what I have imagined.
But what I said is, if Rubio were to surge, you end up with Cruz and Rubio basically even, and you end up with Trump on top, and then neither Cruz nor Rubio will drop out, we're just in it for the long haul.
And that's precisely what happened, because that's the way that this is all gonna go.
It's just gonna be crap all the way from here, There's a real deep desire on the part of a lot of Trump supporters for Trump, and I think a desire on the part of people who aren't Trump supporters to kind of see what happens.
I was talking with Andrew Klavan and Jeremy Boring before the show, and one of the things I was saying to them is that there's a famous rule in drama.
It's a rule that's written by Anton Chekhov, the famous dramatist, famous playwright, and what he said is if you're writing a two-act play, never put a gun over the mantle in the first act unless you're going to use it in the second act.
Because it creates a feeling of suspense if the gun is there, and if it doesn't get fired by the end of the second act, then you really haven't done your job as a playwright.
It's beginning to occur to me that this is not just normative.
It's not just something you should do.
It is also descriptive, meaning that human beings have an intense desire to see the trigger pulled.
So if we know that the gun is up on the mantle, It's got to be pulled before the end of the second act.
We want it to be pulled before the end of the second act.
I remember when I was watching Lord of the Rings, the trilogy, I hadn't read the books and I did what a lot of folks did with the new Star Wars movie.
I blacked myself out on all knowledge of what was going to happen in Return of the King.
I mean, we got to the very end of Return of the King.
I'm not going to issue a spoiler alert since the book has been out for 70 years and the movie's been out for 10.
At the very end of Return of the King, You get to the very end, and Frodo is about to throw the ring into Mount Doom, and instead, he turns around and he says, the ring is mine, and he takes it.
And it's really dramatically satisfying, because if he hadn't done that, if he just took it and threw it into the flame, you'd have gone, well then, it wasn't that strong a ring, was it?
I mean, you have to see it work on him.
You realize that For all three movies, you haven't been waiting for Frodo to throw the ring into the fire.
What you've actually been waiting for is for Frodo to be seduced by the ring.
You've been waiting for him to go full scale from Innocent Hobbit and the Shire to full Gollum.
And, you know, the ring ends up in Mount Doom anyway along with Gollum, but that's the point.
It's the same thing with Trump.
There's a desire, and I think I said this even before the Iowa caucuses, That if Trump were to flame out, it would be so anticlimactic after all this buildup.
And so I think there are a lot of people out there who sort of feel the same compulsion.
It's like, you know, you want to be part of the story.
You want to be part of history.
There's only one problem.
This story is not a good story.
This story does not end well.
This story ends with Donald Trump as the nominee, and then we've got the most corrupt person maybe in the history of American politics, Hillary Clinton, on one side, and on the other side we've got Donald Trump, who doesn't know his ass from his elbow on policy, and that's the kind interpretation.
The less kind interpretation is that he does, and he just does whatever is convenient for him, because this is all about Trump.
And here's just a couple of examples.
Again, this has become sort of a daily phenomenon where we fact-check Donald Trump, which is essentially a fool's errand.
But here is Donald Trump talking about what was in his head in 2002 with regard to Iraq.
So he actually said to Howard Stern back in 2002 that he thought it'd be a good idea to invade Iraq.
And Chuck Todd says, yeah, but in all your debates, you keep saying that you thought it was a bad idea.
What did you mean by that?
And here is Trump explaining it away.
unidentified
We have an idea who the enemy is, and a lot of times the politicians don't want to tell you that.
Well, what I mean by that is it almost shouldn't have been done and, you know, I really don't even know what I mean because that was a long time ago and who knows what was in my head.
I think that it wasn't done correctly.
In retrospect, it shouldn't have been done at all.
It was sort of, you know, it was just done.
It was just we dropped bombs.
If you look back, actually, that was probably the correct way of doing it, not going in and not upsetting, giving him a lesson and not.
I mean, I think Senior actually did a pretty good job of what he was doing.
He went in, he taught him a lesson.
What happened is he was taunted because Saddam Hussein was saying, we drove back the Americans.
The ugly Americans were driven back.
The power of Iraq, the power.
Well, we were driven back.
He just decided not, General Schwarzkopf and others said, Maybe let's not go in.
I'm not sure, although I think Schwarzkopf actually maybe wanted to go in.
I think he maybe did the right thing.
I can say this.
If you look at my conversation with Howard, who's a friend of mine, who's actually a very good person, a good guy.
Different from what you see on the radio.
Okay, I won't tell you.
But if you look at my conversation, I was a very... That was probably the first time... Don't forget, I was in business.
I was a businessman.
I was a real estate man and a businessman.
That was the first time I think that question was ever even asked of me.
That was long before the war took place.
That was, you know, many, many months before the war took place.
And you could see by my answer, I wasn't exactly thrilled.
He said, in that clip, that one clip, which is like 45 seconds long, Trump takes, I think, four separate positions on this.
One, I don't know what I was talking about.
Two, the war was prosecuted badly.
Three, the war was prosecuted great.
And four, it didn't matter what I said anyway, because I was a businessman at that point.
He took four separate positions in one 45 second clip and his people are going, oh, we can trust him.
We can totally trust him.
He's gonna be completely consistent.
We know for what he stands.
I know what he stands for.
He stands for Trump.
That's what Trump stands for.
And that's an amazing... It's an amazing... I don't know what I was talking about, but I guess, you know... The part that's amazing is where he says that we shouldn't have gone in in the first place, but then we should have gone in, but we did it wrong, but we did it right... What?
But that wasn't his only big boo-boo of the weekend.
He was also asked about whether he wants to defund Planned Parenthood.
And here's Donald Trump talking about Planned Parenthood with Chuck Todd.
There's some comic actor he's beginning to look more and more like, and it's slipping my mind.
We'll have to come back to it when I figure it out.
Okay, so now, I mean, he reduces you to guttural moans because his butchery of the English language and of ideas and of conservatism, I mean, he's basically the Attila the Hun of politics, just carving a swath through anything decent and good.
When Donald Trump says things like, Planned Parenthood, I have many women who understand Planned Parenthood better than any of us ever will.
Really?
Really, will they?
What do they understand about Planned Parenthood because they have vaginas, Donald, that the rest of us can't understand?
It's just beyond our ken to understand what exactly Planned Parenthood does.
And then he says that only 4% of their services are abortion?
That's because what Planned Parenthood does is if you walk into Planned Parenthood and you pick up a brochure and a condom and an abortion, they count that as one-third of the services they have rendered.
Even if it takes 90% of the time.
Well over 90% of Planned Parenthood's budget goes to actual abortion.
And that's where all their money comes from, too.
They perform 300,000 of them a year.
But there he is, defending Planned Parenthood.
There's your guy, your conservative thought leader, defending Planned Parenthood.
And this is the part that's so maddening.
Jerry Falwell Jr., who leads Liberty University.
Okay, Liberty University was created by his dad, Jerry Falwell.
Jerry Falwell Jr.
leads Liberty.
Liberty has a policy.
You cannot go to Liberty University if you have an abortion.
If you are on campus and you go for an abortion, you are expelled.
Jerry Falwell Jr.
spent yesterday defending Donald Trump over what he said over Planned Parenthood.
And by the way, I still don't understand what he's talking about.
He says, so long as they're performing abortions, we can't fund them.
So long as they're performing abortions... So that means you can't fund them.
Why not just say we can't fund them?
The answer is because he got himself into a little bit of a rhetorical pickle.
He said he wanted to fund them, but not the abortions.
And then he says, well, I don't want to fund them at all so long as they're doing abortions, which means don't fund them at all.
And it's as though every word that you say about Trump falls on deaf ears.
And I'll explain why I think that is in just a moment.
Marco Rubio is tentatively kind of tapping at Trump now.
Trump today said that Marco Rubio isn't eligible for the presidency.
So this is his new strategy.
Every single person other than Donald Trump is actually constitutionally ineligible to be president of the United States.
Here's Donald Trump being knocked a little bit by Marco Rubio.
Rubio and Cruz are spending all their time and effort bashing each other, but here's Rubio going after Trump a little bit.
Well, I think Donald's campaign has largely been about how bad things are.
And there's no doubt we need to recognize how difficult things are.
But you can't just say you're going to make America great again.
You have to explain how you're going to do it.
I mean, at this stage in the campaign, voters deserve to know in great detail just exactly how it is that you are going to achieve some of these things that you're saying you're going to achieve with specific public policy.
So I look forward to having a policy debate, if we can make it a policy debate, and we'll see what direction he wants to go, but I think that's a big difference in this campaign.
And then just a fundamental understanding of foreign policy, which I think is critical for the Commander-in-Chief to have on day one.
To this point now, three states in, he still has not really demonstrated that, but again, we'll see.
As the weeks go on, maybe he'll spend some time and learn more about it, and we can have a debate about those issues.
But listen, Chuck, the important thing is we had an incredible evening last night.
Last night, what we saw happen in South Carolina, particularly when you put Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina together, two things have happened.
Number one, there is now only one strong conservative in this race who can win, and we see conservatives continuing to unite behind our campaign.
But number two, for anyone who doesn't believe that Donald Trump is the best candidate to go head-to-head with Hillary Clinton in November, and that's about 70% of Republicans nationwide who don't think Donald Trump is the right guy, our campaign is the only campaign that has beaten Donald Trump and that can beat Donald Trump.
So what we're seeing Is we're seeing Republicans coming to us in incredible numbers, going to TedCruz.org, signing up, volunteering, contributing.
So Chuck, our path to victory from the beginning was always do well in the first four states and then have a strong, strong night on Super Tuesday coming up on March 1st.
In Iowa, everyone in the press said we couldn't win.
We want an overwhelming victory in Iowa.
In New Hampshire, everyone in the press said a conservative couldn't do well in a moderate New England state.
We want a strong third there.
And then in South Carolina, we were effectively tied for second.
A week ago, Donald was 20 points ahead.
We closed that gap.
And what we saw there, there were a number of very encouraging things.
For one thing, we won young people in South Carolina.
Our campaign was in first place with young people.
By the way, we won young people in Iowa as well, and we were in second place with young people in New Hampshire.
One of the things we're seeing is young people who are optimistic, who want a future, who want our constitutional rights.
I'm proud of the campaign that we've run to unify our country and to advocate conservative solutions that would give more Americans the opportunity to rise up and reach their God-given potential.
But the people of Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina have spoken, and I really respect their decision.
I congratulate my competitors that are remaining on the island on their success for a race that has been hard fought, just as the contest for the presidency should be, because it is a tough job.
In this campaign, I have stood my ground, refusing to bend to the political winds.
We put forward detailed, innovative, conservative plans to address the mounting challenges that we face.
Because, despite what you might have heard, ideas matter.
Policy matters.
And I truly hope that these ideas that we've laid out will serve as a blueprint for a generation of conservative leaders at every level of government so that we can take back our country.
We laid out plans on everything from reforming our tax and regulatory system, to reviving our economy, to rebuilding our military, and to fixing the VA once and for all.
Okay, so he goes on in this vein and people are saying, oh, it's so honorable that Jeb finally dropped out.
What a good guy to finally drop out.
And all I have to say is, so what?
He drops out and nothing happens.
Some of his money shifts behind Rubio.
That's it.
Nothing else happens, right?
He's got no votes left.
Nobody supports him.
He dumped out all of his resources.
By the way, the person shouting no when Jeb says he's dropping out, the person who goes no in the background is for sure Mike Murphy, the head of his super PACs, who spent like $100 million.
How much money did Mike Murphy make in this election cycle for running the least successful campaign in American history?
How much money do you think he actually got?
Any ideas?
Any ideas?
The answer is he got $14 million.
Won $4 million to run the worst campaign in presidential history.
He was the one in the back shouting, no Jeb, keep running!
Keep running!
You can see the bank account just spinning like a lotto wheel.
So there we go.
So Jeb is out.
Alright, so what that brings us to now is Donald Trump.
So Donald Trump actually won in South Carolina.
And here's the thing.
Everybody's using these stats.
70% of Republicans don't like Trump.
70% of Republicans don't like Trump.
If you use the same sort of math, that means that 85% of Republicans don't like Rubio, right?
And it means that, you know, 90% of Republicans don't like Cruz.
Whatever percentages you're using, if the idea is whoever didn't vote for you doesn't like you, well then more people like Trump than the other guys.
If the idea is that these public opinion polls that show that Trump has high unfavorables Are trusted, and people don't like him.
That's true, except for the fact that he's consistently outperforming those when it comes time for election day.
So, yes, his unfavorable numbers are really high.
But, will people get behind him against Hillary Clinton?
Probably yes.
I mean, Trump is actually right when he says this.
Here's Trump, after winning, here's what he had to say about how this is all gonna break down.
You know, I was watching upstairs, and it was really amazing to be watching what I was watching, and some of the pundits, and you know, overall fair, but not too much, but a number of the pundits said, well, if a couple of the other candidates dropped out, if you add their scores together, it's going to equal Trump.
And I think they better get their act together because they're going to keep losing elections.
With the kind of thinking that we have with the Karl Roves and the Stephen Hayses and these characters that can't get themselves arrested, if you want to keep people like that, if you want to keep listening to people like that, you're never going to win.
If the delegates get accumulated in such a way that any one of these candidates becomes a nominee, it's our job to support that nominee, and we will.
So yeah, we're prepared to support whoever the nominee becomes.
I think it's early in the process, but certainly When the time comes and when we're sitting either before Cleveland or at Cleveland or whenever that point may come and we have a presumptive nominee, what will happen is the RNC will join in with that nominee and we will put together the biggest, which we've already started doing, the biggest ground game and data operation that we've ever seen.
And you know we've made incredible strides at the RNC in becoming far more prepared today than we were four years ago.
So yes, we will support.
To me, it's a no-brainer.
unidentified
A lot of top Republicans think that's going to break the party apart.
You know, when he says, the key line here is where he says that victory is the antidote to everything.
That depends on whether you think the Republican Party is just a vehicle for victory, in which case they're fulfilling their mandate, or whether you think the Republican Party should be a vehicle for conservatism.
And these are two different things.
If you think it's a vehicle for victory, then you could just nominate, you know, somebody who's really far left and say, okay, that person's most likely to win, let's do that.
What have you gained through that?
If you think it's a vehicle for ideology, then you have to look at Trump and wonder, okay, is he going to actually be conservative?
I think that there will be a lot of people who stay home.
Eric Erickson, over at RedState, or formerly of RedState, I think he has a new site called The Resurgent, Eric Erickson writes today that he won't vote for Trump.
I don't think he's the only one.
We'll talk in the future about whether this is a good idea or a bad idea as this becomes kind of closer to eventuality, as it becomes closer to reality.
But these are questions the party is going to have to face because they didn't stop the rise of Trump.
So let's talk about what happens next in the Republican race because in a couple of days or tomorrow, right, what's – What's the date today?
Today's the 22nd.
So tomorrow is the Nevada caucus.
Trump's gonna blow everybody out.
He's gonna win the Nevada caucus by leaps and bounds.
And then, Trump has a shot to run the table.
So right now they're saying that Trump currently leads the polling.
In 10 of the next 14 states.
Problem is those polls are really old.
So the states in which he currently trails, the states in which he currently trails that are coming up over the next week and a half, he trails Ted Cruz in Texas.
But in the last available poll, he was trailing by five points to Cruz and that's a poll that's three weeks old before South Carolina and New Hampshire and Nevada.
So after Trump wins three consecutive victories, does Cruz maintain his five-point lead, his slim five-point lead in Texas, even with Rubio nipping at his heels?
I doubt it.
Trump trails Rubio by two points in the latest Colorado poll.
But that latest Colorado poll was taken way back in November, so Ben Carson was actually winning that poll.
So it was Carson 25 and Rubio 19 and Trump 17.
You think maybe now Trump is winning Colorado?
I would be hard-pressed to say no.
He's probably winning Colorado.
And he's supposedly losing in Arkansas, but that poll's really old.
And, again, he was running, like, one point behind, I think, Ted Cruz in Arkansas.
He was four points behind in Arkansas, and that was, again, as of early February, before South Carolina or New Hampshire.
And in Kentucky, supposedly, he's behind, but the last poll that was taken was last June.
So, that's completely irrelevant.
So, there's a good shot that Trump wins all 14 of the next states.
If that happens, I mean, come on, how long can you play out this string?
How long can you play out the string if you're Rubio and Cruz?
And this is the maddening part, the truly maddening part, is that Trump has some narrative points in his favor.
One is the sort of inevitability feeling, the idea that we have to take that gun off the mantle and it must be used or we haven't fulfilled the dramatic quotient here.
But Trump also fulfills the anti-Wall Street narrative.
He fulfills the anti-establishment narrative better than anybody.
Rubio's being endorsed today by Tim Pawlenty, the former senator from Minnesota, governor from Minnesota.
Like, who cares?
Mitt Romney was supposed to endorse Rubio.
That's not happening because Rubio specifically went to Romney and said, I don't want your endorsement right now, you're gonna hurt me.
And the more establishment endorsers I have, the worse it looks for me.
Cruz is actually anti-establishment, as I've been saying, but the problem is that Trump looks more anti-establishment than Cruz, even though the establishment would certainly prefer Trump to Cruz.
And Trump is an angry guy, and he's channeling that anger.
And finally, the real reason that Trump is the frontrunner right now is because of the ego.
Because again, it comes down to, if Cruz dropped out, Rubio would win.
If Rubio dropped out, Cruz would win.
Neither of them will drop out, and so Trump will win.
That's what it's coming down to right now.
Rubio spent the last few weeks attacking Cruz, so the chances that Cruz would go along with any plan to drop out and take a second slot really low.
Cruz has been attacking Rubio.
More importantly, Rubio doesn't think he needs Cruz in order to win.
Rubio apparently has been making overtures to John Kasich.
Trying to gain his 7% of the vote, as though that's going to make any difference in any of these states.
So, if you're a betting person, you would have to put your money on Trump right now.
I've been saying that for the last couple of weeks, really ever since New Hampshire, that Trump is the frontrunner, and he's a very real frontrunner.
It's very frustrating that Republicans continue to pretend that he's not.
You have Cruz and Rubio going at each other.
It's a waste of time.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the aisle, Nevada caucuses happened for the Democrats, and Hillary won by 6 points.
But the Democrats have a problem too, and this is what's so frustrating.
The Democrats are actually vulnerable here.
They're actually vulnerable here.
Listen to the sort of ire from the Sanders camp over Hillary winning.
So Chris Matthews, for heaven's sake, he combed his hair with a shoe, as is his wont, and then he proceeded to say on MSNBC that the only reason that she won in Nevada is not because she's a better politician, but because of backroom politics.
And there you see Brian Williams, fresh off his latest tour in Vietnam, Shooting down random Vietcong planes and fighting aliens in space and blowing up asteroids like Bruce Willis.
Here's Brian Williams on MSNBC along with Rachel and Chris Hayes.
No, it's Rachel Maddow.
Sorry, Rachel Maddow.
And here is Chris Matthews.
unidentified
Chris, it was having watched hours of you that I heard Ralston say that the casino caucuses, the day shift workers who were allowed to come out and caucus, those were coming in in Clark County, the environs of Las Vegas, so heavily for Hillary Clinton.
You know, I think it's an example that we have to pick up on ourselves, which is not all politics happens on television.
It's not all speeches.
It's not TV ads that are paid for.
It's not free media.
We give interviews to people.
It's not debates.
Things happen on the telephone.
They happen in back rooms.
They happen in labor halls where labor leaders still have strength.
They can be engaged in pulling operations and get people Out of their homes on a beautiful Saturday, like out here in this gorgeous weather, to spend several hours inside, involved in this kind of wrestling match, to see how you actually vote.
Off the screen is what happened here.
Harry Reid is not Mr. Charisma, but he is one forceful figure.
Why do you think he's leader of the Senate Democrats?
Because he can work the phones, he can work relationships, and he has a great set of...
...as to what's going to happen.
He saw Hillary Clinton in trouble out here.
And he put together the best organization, which he's done so many times before, to make things happen.
And that included the working people here.
If you come out here, you actually see people doing their jobs.
It's an amazing place because you see the crew PAs.
Dealing the cards.
You watch the pit bosses standing over them with those grim faces.
You watch the waitresses running around.
You watch the concierges when you ask them, can you get me tickets tonight?
So you see what their jobs are.
They don't make a lot of money, but they all showed up today.
Three hour breaks according to MGM Grand.
MGM that owns New York, New York, which is our host here.
So you really saw democracy in action, but it wasn't a TV event.
Until our guy, Jacob Sovorov, and of course, Chris Hayes got in there and showed us a bit of it.
The bottom line is that Hillary got out her union buddies to push all of the croupiers and all of the pit bosses and all the people playing cards and all the people serving drinks and janitors and people who serve food over the buffet and people who clean all the windows and every other employee of these hotels like New York, New York and Paris and the MGM Grand and the Flamingo and all the different hotels in Las Vegas and other cities like Las Vegas, like Atlantic City and Las Vegas and Atlantic City like all those different cities.
So, they got all...
The bottom line is Hillary twisted people's arms to get out there.
She works with the unions, they twisted arms, they got the people out for Hillary.
And if you looked at those numbers in that little video there, Hillary won less than 5,000 votes in Nevada.
Massive victory!
Massive victory!
She's very vulnerable, and Bernie Sanders is very angry about the fact that he lost, and he's saying, Hillary has no message, she's copying my message.
Here's Bernie Sanders going after Hillary Clinton.
of a rigged economy where ordinary Americans work longer hours for lower wages and almost all new income and wealth goes to the top 1%, a corrupt campaign finance system in which billionaires are buying elections.
I think our message is resonating and obviously the proof of that is that Hillary Clinton is more or less echoing much of what we are saying.
I think that indicates the success that we are having.
Okay, so he says that Hillary is echoing his message, and then Hillary is stumbling around.
She doesn't know what she even has to say.
So Hillary, she was asked why she's in the race, and she said she understands voters saying that she's in it for herself, is clip 15.
Here's Hillary Clinton talking about why she's in the race, and the answer is she has no idea, but she's just going to wear odd outfits until she's handed the nomination.
What is she wearing in this thing?
She looks like something out of Star Trek.
Here we go, Hillary Clinton, threat level red.
Hillary Clinton.
unidentified
I understand that voters have questions.
I'm going to do my very best to answer those questions.
I think there's an underlying question that maybe is really in the back of people's minds, and that is, you know, is she in it for us or is she in it for herself?
a question that people are trying to sort through.
Yes.
And I'm going to demonstrate that I've always been the same person, fighting for the same values, fighting to make a real difference in people's lives, long before I was ever in elected office, even before my husband was in the presidency.
So I know that I have to make my case.
I have to demonstrate what I've achieved.
I have to really make clear that, look, we want to make progress in our country.
She's struggling so hard here.
We want to make a real difference in people's lives.
And she's starting to look like Ian Holm in Alien.
Like, her head is going to come off and she's going to continue talking.
And maybe that's why she has that bizarre collar, is because she's actually hiding the robotics within.
So, the Democrats are really vulnerable, and meanwhile the Republicans are messing around with a guy who clearly is a demagogue, like Trump.
And it's very frustrating all the way through.
You know, the only good news in any of this is that the outrage is real.
The reaction is wrong.
The outrage is okay, but the backlash, the idea that we're gonna go with somebody like Trump, who's, he is reaching out for all the wrong answers, it's disturbing and it's problematic and it's a waste of an opportunity more than anything else, whether he wins or whether he loses.
Okay, time for some things that I like and then some things that I hate.
Okay, things that I like.
I started reading a book called The Rise and Fall of Crime in America by Barry Latzer.
As I mentioned last week, I finished the book Nudge by Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler over the weekend.
And it's a somewhat creepy book.
The idea is that the government should basically set your defaults.
So if you have an option between eating a healthy meal and a non-healthy meal at a restaurant, then the restaurant should basically put out just the healthy meal options and hide the non-healthy meal options.
That if you are going to be enrolled in a certain type of social security, the government should encourage you to enroll in one type of social security over another.
They call it libertarian paternalism.
The idea is the government shouldn't force you to do things.
The problem is they assume a huge, powerful government, and then they say the government that's already huge and powerful should push you toward one option or another.
If they're real libertarians, they'd say the government should get out of this completely, and we should just encourage people to be aware of their own cognitive biases, what they call cognitive biases.
We all make sort of cognitive mistakes, and those mistakes actually have ramifications for the choices that we make in our lives.
And so if we're aware of them, it makes it more obvious for us not to do it.
And so that part of the book is valuable.
Their solutions, however, are problematic.
Okay, other things that I like.
The Rise and Fall of Crime in America, as I mentioned.
I've read about the first half of it and it is very good by Barry Latzer.
I recommend it highly.
It's a very informative book from Encounter about why it is that the crime rates dropped so dramatically.
Okay, a bit of musical things that I like.
So normally I do classical music, and I talk about all the classical music that I love.
The Brahms String Quintet, if you haven't heard it, is just a spectacular piece, piano quintet rather, is a spectacular piece of music.
But for a little bit of pop music, I get a lot of questions in the mailbag, and the mailbag's been chock full lately.
bshapiro at dailywire.com.
And if I haven't had a chance to reply to you personally, I apologize, but we're literally at this point getting over 100 emails into the mailbag every single day, so I don't really have time to respond to everyone.
I do my best.
If I don't respond, then maybe we'll force Lindsay to do it, but somebody will respond to you and let you know at least that your letter was received.
But as far as pop music, I mentioned, I think, Jim Croce a couple of weeks ago.
Along those same lines, really underrated songwriter is Carole King, who started off as a songwriter, and then she didn't think that she was a good singer, and she doesn't have an amazing voice, but she's a terrific songwriter.
You know Carole King from songs like You've Got a Friend, which is a terrific song.
For those who haven't heard it, here's Carole King doing You've Got a Friend.
unidentified
*applause* The 1980s here, actually.
Great song.
It's a great song.
Close your eyes and think of me.
And soon I will be there to brighten up even your darkest night.
This is the stupidest crap anybody ever put on a film.
This is legitimately stupid crap.
So basically what he's saying, I don't even know what that means.
Don't take the road less traveled, take the road more traveled?
Is that the idea here?
And we're all on the same team.
Thank you for the list of platitudes, President Obama.
And it really is.
I mean, it's President Obama and it's Trump.
Our politics is all platitudes now.
The Obama thing has no reference to the race of the kid.
That doesn't matter.
It's the fact that our politics is all just a list of platitudes.
Everything this kid is saying could be coming out of the mouth of Hillary or Sanders or Trump They all say the same stupid crap, and it's all crap like this, this faux-inspirational, Dr. Phil garbage that doesn't mean anything.
And then they put it coming out of the mouth of the kid, and you're just like, oh, that's so cute!
It's so cute that the little kid is saying things that we all should hear!
Just listen to the children!
You may have noticed, there's a theme to my programs.
Never listen to the kids!
Don't listen to children.
They're tiny people, okay?
But they're not tiny adults.
They're tiny people, meaning their brains are less developed.
Don't listen to them.
When they tell you to do things, it's because they're children, okay?
It's your job to be the adult.
I love my baby, but I don't take political advice from my baby.
She's the best, but she's not the best because she gives me life advice on my finances or tells me about Robert Frost poems.
Hey, don't listen to kids.
First of all, don't listen to kids whose scripts are being written by adults either.
That's particularly silly.
So, Kid President, just something else that I despise.
Stop using the children for all of this.
It's really dumb and it's really irritating.
Okay, that's it for today.
We'll be back tomorrow with more news in the death of the Republic, presumably.
Perhaps Donald Trump will have actually declared that the Cubs will never win a World Series because he's... That at least would be good.
I hate the Cubs.
But, you know, it's... It's a disaster.
Don't worry.
We'll get through it together.
We'll get through it together.
And the good news is this.
If the wrong people get elected, then you and I, everybody who's watching this, will probably all end up in the same prison together.
So then we'll get to hang out personally!
So if I didn't answer your emails, I'll see you there!