All Episodes
Feb. 15, 2019 - Brother Nathanael
03:50
Anti BDS As Group Think
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The Senate just passed yet another package of aid to Israel.
It contained legislation called the Combatting BDS Act, which runs smack dab into a clash with the First Amendment.
Sponsored by Marco Rubio, perhaps to please his donor Norman Bremen, the act rubber stamps states that penalize boycotters of Israel.
Every single Republican voted for the bill, save this one.
One of the things that I think is fundamental to our country is the freedom to protest, the freedom to dissent, and the freedom to boycott, if you so choose.
Our country was actually founded with a boycott.
The boycott was dumping English tea into the ocean.
In my state, Henry Clay was famous for passing legislation boycotting British goods so that people would wear American clothing.
He actually fought a duel over that and became famous and then became one of the most famous US senators.
Right. Boycotts are a long-established political tool.
Why should Israel get a pass?
Why should Rubio and his backers decide what political expression is or isn't allowed and authorized?
Rand says no way.
I'm not making really a point on whether the boycott's good or bad or with regard to Israeli policy.
My point is whether it's good or bad with regard to the First Amendment.
You see, the First Amendment isn't really about Hearing from people about things that you like, if it's speech that you like and people say, you're a great guy, you're not going to be offended by that speech.
It's when people are critical of you or critical of your thoughts or have different thoughts.
But that's what the First Amendment's about.
Right. It protects speech you don't want to hear.
Yet Rubio isn't about America's fundamental principles.
His eyes rest sentimentally on Tel Aviv.
Boycotting Israel is discriminatory, says he.
But no one's prejudicing a race or creed, but instead protesting a policy of discrimination that Israel carries out against Palestinians.
It's like someone saying back in Martin Luther King's day, Don't protest sending blacks to the back of the bus, because if you do, you're discriminating against the bus driver.
Yet, Rubio tweets, BDS is about destroying Israel.
B.S. With Israel getting 10 million U.S. bucks per day and armed to the teeth with nukes, Israel needs anti-BDS laws to keep it from being destroyed?
Come on!
Rather, it fears that its good guy brand is fading, whether through BDS or outright censure.
Wrong think is catching up with the narration.
What to do? Subplant it with groupthink.
It's groupthink around here.
Everybody's so paranoid and says, oh, we can't object to this lobby because this lobby's so powerful, we can't object to them.
That takes balls, Rand Paul.
Bravo. But strange, how is it that grown men, Republican senators who cry, Constitution, the Constitution, can't stand up to, uh, The lobby.
That means the next administration, whatever party that's in, six years from now, whenever that may be, is going to inherit a law that has codified the Memorandum of Understanding as a floor and makes clear to the world that the U.S. has a legal commitment, not just a moral one, but a legal obligation to come to Israel's assistance and to continue to provide help.
And toss the First Amendment into the trash.
Export Selection