That's a recent New York Times headline in its widely read op-ed section.
Yet, in spite of the article's title, no other recent killings of Jews in Paris are cited that would indicate an epidemic of anti-Semitic killings.
Toss out the inflated Holocaust rant, then the crime downsizes to an ordinary robbery-murder by a pair of thugs.
The victim, a woman, wasn't killed because she was a Jew, but because she was known as a neighbor by one of the killers and thought to have money.
Also, contrary to the headline, the victim was not, strictly speaking, a Holocaust survivor.
She was never in one of the work camps.
But instead, the designation applies to her husband, a survivor of Auschwitz.
That's a new kind of selective service that expands the ever-snowbowing survivors list because, quite frankly, they're losing survivors.
But the Shoah business must go on.
Then, casting the robbery-turned-homicide as motivated by the same hatred that drove Hitler, one is hard-pressed to find a Hitler-on-demand angle.
For as it surfaced later, one of the slayers told the other, she's a Jew, she must have money.
Thus, all of the known circumstances point to a crime of opportunity and not an anti-Jewish hate crime.
Adding insult to injury to our rational faculties, it's Bibsey's turn to cry.
Prime Minister Netanyahu, thank you for sitting down with us.
Anti-Semitism in Europe is nothing new, but the results of our survey are still quite striking.
More than a quarter of Europeans believe that Jews have too much influence in politics and finance.
20% believe that anti-Semitism is a response to the everyday actions of Jews.
You travel to Europe often, you meet the leaders there.
Are you surprised? Well, let's distinguish between two things.
First, the sources of anti-Semitism.
There's old anti-Semitism in Europe that came from the extreme right, and that's still around.
But there's also new anti-Semitism that comes from the extreme left.
Bibsy serves up a combo platter.
And lo and behold, mortal enemies, opposite fringes on the right and left, agree on one thing, hatred of Jews.
Bravo, Bibsy!
Only you could have pulled that one off.
It's easy to sit here and make statements and say never again every Holocaust Memorial Day, but that's not going to end this.
Do you see the concrete actions that need to happen here on the part of European countries?
The real issue is can we tolerate the idea that people say that Israel doesn't have a right to exist, which I think is the ultimate anti-Semitic statement, you know?
The majority of the Jewish people are very soon going to be living in Israel.
There are over six million Jews now living in Israel.
So the new anti-Semite say this, well, we're not against Jews, we're just against the state of Israel.
That's like, I would say, well, I'm not against French people, I just don't think there should be France.
Wrong number.
Very few say they're against Israel because it's made up of Jews, as Bibsey equates with saying you're against France because it's made up of Frenchmen.
It's a false equivalency.
The consensual critique of Israel is instead condemning its conduct toward Palestinians.
Namely, stealing their homes, shooting peaceful protesters, murdering civilians under military occupation, and lobbing phosphorus bombs on Gazan neighborhoods.
Where's the hate?
In gay Paris or in cheerless Palestine?
Yet the murder of a Holocaust survivor was worked up into a shrill, and Treblinka New York Times op-ed aimed at all those anti-Semites on the right, the left, the center, I mean everywhere, ready to bounce at a moment's notice.
It seems, pardon my French, that Holocaust fatigue is on the upswing.