Blood Money - White Privilege is the Law! with Brandon Joe Williams, Blood Money Episode 301

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 15, 2025 - Blood Money

01:58:05

White Privilege is the Law! with Brandon Joe Williams, Blood Money Episode 301

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, guys, welcome to the latest episode of Blood Money.
	Today we have one of my favorite guests, Brandon Joe Williams.
	How you doing, sir?
	Good, man.
	How you doing?
	Man, it's really great to have you on the podcast.
	You know, we've had you on here.
	I think this is the third or fourth time.
	And you, I mean, you've been nonstop, brother.
	I mean, let's kind of, before we get into everything, the main topic of this episode, which is that we're going to be focusing on some of your more most recent findings, what you told me a few days ago, absolutely mind-blowing information.
	Let's give everybody your URLs because for the viewers out there, there's already so much information on Brandon's websites in terms of videos, documents, and he does it all pretty much because he loves to give this to the people.
	So Brandon, what are the key websites where people could find your work and the basis of this conversation?
	Yeah, sure.
	I could even do a screen share and show you guys.
	Because it's just a lot.
	So it's probably better to just show it.
	Okay.
	Yeah, we've got one stupid fucked.com, which is the one most people think is pretty funny, right?
	This one here, we've got all sorts of different things, but we have a step-by-step guide.
	It says here, step-by-step guide, start here.
	This is a great place to just full text breakdown of like all the different things and the free course.
	And the first things I recommend are to sign up for the free course.
	And then also read what's called the treatise on the word person, which is what you just finished reading, which is on Williams and Williams Law Firm.com.
	And you're going to see this website.
	You're just going to click on the link here, treatise on the word person.
	Scroll down, and then you'll be reading this.
	It's the size of maybe a small book.
	It's fairly easy to read.
	It's going to require a little bit of work, but it's not too hard.
	And then also the Driving V Traveling on Williams and Williams Law Firm.com.
	You can see it here.
	Scroll down.
	So the free course plus these two very long, detailed breakdowns will give you, I mean.
	I'll just toot my own horn here.
	You know, after 10,000 of hours probably putting into this, if you read the treatise and read Driving versus Traveling and go through the course, you know, you're going to be.
	probably as far along with this information as somebody would have been had they been studying it for like 35 plus years previously.
	So we're crunching it down, you know, maybe 30, 35 years worth of this information you can get now in a few weeks.
	So it's a pretty big.
	And then we're obviously still, I'm still working very, very hard to get that even down even farther.
	How do we get faster with it?
	How can we get 50 years of research done in a week?
	You know, that's kind of like where this is headed.
	Obviously, as we go farther and farther and farther down that rabbit hole it gets harder and harder and harder to crunch that um you know we're going to hit a rock bottom at some point i'd probably say the rock bottom is going to be like you know 40 or 50 years with research in like two weeks wow wow and by the way when i uh made the screen bigger king pickle fucking I'm
	so glad I didn't see that before.
	I was zooming in your flow.
	It's the best.
	It's the best, bro man you know um i gotta tell people you know before we get into all the technical good stuff um uh about you know being a white person in this country and all this amazing new information i gotta tell people man we're um We're having some lunch or dinner the other day and some of the stuff we're talking about was so wild, man.
	We left that meeting going like, you know, it kind of feels like we're the motherfucking Avengers, you know what I'm saying?
	Like this whole crew of like, so, you know, tell us about the, you know, Slow Jamestan a little bit.
	Let's talk about the man for a sec, you know?
	Oh, Jamestan is the best.
	So, so I'll show it to you guys.
	It's better to show it to you this is another one it's just better to show it's so much fun no so so it's www.slowjam-ast-a-n.org not is-t um this a it's a it's a micronation that's way out in the already laughing he look at this crocodile this is by the way guys the reason why the crocodile threat level moderate
	I just, that's so great.
	This is, this is actually real stuff, by the way.
	That's what I find so fascinating that yes, you can actually set up your own nation.
	This is part of what Brandon teaches.
	I mean, we're going to get into some of the more, I guess, serious and technical stuff in a second, but this is an actual real thing.
	These guys set up their own micro nation.
	This dude walks around literally looking like a hybrid of like Muammar Gaddafi meets like Fidel Castro.
	He's got people that...
	you know you tell me like there's people that follow him around and kind of treat him like he's like supposed to be the king of this nation or Yeah, he's got a patrol agent, chief porter patrol agent.
	And the reason why is because they found out legally that if they just switch the P and the B, it's no longer illegal for them to have trucks that say Porter Patrol on them.
	So that's how they did it, right?
	Director of Emergency Services, this is Randy Williams, the Sultan of Slojomistan.
	This is Director of Land Management, Joe Lindsey.
	I mean, these guys look all official, though.
	This guy, Matt Conti here, and Joe Lindsey, they look too normal.
	Slojomistan Security Forces.
	Well, if you want to see me, I'll go ahead and, you know, go to about, and then you're going to go to parliament, I believe.
	And then you're going to go down.
	Here's all the parliament members.
	We've got your press secretary general.
	We've got your special forces.
	We've got your secretary treasury, crown prince, director of S3.
	We've got your director of misdirection.
	We've got your empress.
	We have the princess, duchess of Croc Rehab, a very strong rule.
	You're not allowed to wear crocs within the territorial boundaries of Slovakia.
	And then we have the minister of tomfoolery.
	That's one of their two constitutional things, right?
	You can't wear crocs.
	What was the second one?
	You have to peel string cheese.
	You can't bite right into it.
	That's a big one.
	That's a big one.
	That'll get you put in the stocks, right?
	We've got Minister of Crafts and Napping, Director of Counterintelligence.
	We have the Minister of Margaritas, Larry Pancake.
	Air Force, Minister of Trans Affairs.
	So you can see it's not really like a left or a right thing.
	It's kind of whatever.
	Come as you are.
	this girl's cute who's this uh director of bean and cheese burrito affairs i'm already hit hit her up for some bean cheese burritos, you know what I'm saying?
	And then we go down and then here's me in the pickle outfit.
	I'm the Prince of Pickles.
	So you click on that.
	It says here, the Nation of the MC Coalition.
	After learning from his fans that cucumbers brine in the behind and transform into pickles, he became the King Pickle of Pickletaria.
	But his relationship with the fellow nation of Slojanistan will be more modest, the Prince of Pickles.
	Oh man, that is awesome.
	And my passport that I have that was issued to me from Slojanistan has this picture on it too.
	So it's pretty funny.
	You open my passport up.
	I can show it to you here.
	I have my diplomatic passport right here.
	Actually, this one's even funnier than that one.
	This one's, I'm smiling.
	Let me turn off the screen share and I'll show it to you.
	Wow, wow.
	So that's a real passport, huh?
	How do you get one of those made?
	Oh, wow.
	That is your visit to Slo Jamestan.
	You had to get it, you had to get it stamped.
	Yep.
	Oh, wow.
	Wow.
	That is really cool, man.
	So that's a real country, real nation, so a real passport.
	And you know, before we go off to our big topic, wow.
	So wait, those are two different copies or?
	Yeah, I have two.
	And then here's some Slo Jamestan dobles which is paper money wow so i mean could you use this stuff if you're going across a border if you show it show your slow jamistan passport People have done it.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	I have my own and then I have my own passport card for the Nation of the Amnesty Coalition.
	i think i showed you guys it though yeah wow here i'm gonna make the screen bigger i'm gonna take the problem is is that you know i don't know if you're putting this on youtube because they for whatever reason if if you put anything that looks like a passport up to the screen too much they like take the video down and they block it for like personal information or whatever but i don't know if you're going to be using youtube but i don't know what it is The only problem I've ever had on any social media with my platform is showing my passports,
	which is super weird.
	But anyways, yeah, it's super fun.
	I mean, we're having a blast.
	It's, it's, so Janistan is.
	So Jamestan is more of a big joke.
	It's all big fun and games, funny, funniness.
	And then My Nation is definitely has a lot of humor infused into it, but it's a little bit, it's quite a bit more on the serious end.
	But Pickles and Pickletaria and it's still got a lot of the goofiness, but it's just a lot more serious.
	And we're actually trying to do something with it rather than it just be like all fun and games.
	So Jamestan is just pure like fun and games.
	It's real, but it doesn't take itself as anything real.
	It's just a, you can't tell if it's real, if it's not, if they think it's real, like you can't tell anything.
	So, and he actually goes.
	to places like NATO and stuff.
	And like, it's hilarious.
	Like he's, he treats it like it's, it's a real thing.
	And it is a real thing, but no one can really tell like what's going on with it.
	It's just a big, hilarious.
	Yeah.
	But lawfully, you're able to establish a nation.
	You're able to have your own currency.
	I mean, this is all lawful.
	It's not.
	Yes, 100%.
	Yeah.
	What I'm doing and what he's doing is 100% legal.
	Yeah.
	Amazing.
	Amazing, amazing.
	And yeah, you know, one of these days we'll get into that topic.
	But the topic that I'm really excited about is, you know, we've been talking a lot about this whole, you know, state national, the sovereign citizen theories, all this stuff.
	And there's been a lot of dialogue and all that all I've heard throughout the years is that you know people really haven't nailed it but what you told me what you shared with me recently and what I just read this morning really is probably the most convincing argument I've ever seen I mean these are laws embedded in case law I mean do you want to just take it over and tell us what you've discovered recently Brandon Yeah, sure.
	So it just comes down to that treatise of the word person.
	And I'll do a screen share again.
	If we go to the treatise here on Williams and Williams Law Firm.com, we can go down and you can just see, you know, I kind of take you for the whole kind of linear timeline as to what it all means, and it's all based off of the word person, right?
	If you look at the constitution preamble, you will see that, and people are aware of this, this isn't anything special.
	We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, right?
	And then we're going to look up the slave importation clause constitution, right?
	And you'll see in the constitution, there is a slave trade clause or migration or importation clause at Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1.
	And it reads as follows, the migration or importation of such persons.
	So the very, very first time we see this delineation between the word people and the word persons is actually literally the constitution.
	There's been a lot of talk about the difference between people and persons, but I'm probably the first person to go along and actually find all of the places in case law and break it all down and show each individual place where they're talking about the difference between the word people and the word persons, right?
	So taking that into account, you know, what happened was as we go to the Dred Scott versus Sanford case, which is in, um, uh, Well, yeah, we can start here.
	So go all the way back to the Naturalization Act of 1790 and originally and still to this day, actually, in order to naturalize as a citizen of a state, because there wasn't such thing as a U.S. citizen until the slaughterhouse cases.
	So in 1790, all the way up until 1873, there was no such thing as a U.S. citizen.
	There was only a state citizen.
	And the only way you could become a state citizen, the only way you could naturalize into the United States of America was you had to be what's called a free white person.
	And the definition of what that means is right here.
	I found all the court cases and stuff that basically delineated what exactly means that a free white person and what doesn't basically it's quite specific but on on a more loose definition we have this one meaning all persons belonging to the European races then commonly counted as white and their descendants, including such descendants in other countries to which they have emigrated.
	But then this one, they go into much deeper detail as to which ones are and which ones are not considered a free white person.
	Obviously, that whole free white person thing, the first time it really became a serious issue was the Dred Scott v.
	Sanford case, which comes from 1857, which is a very, very prominent case that's happened.
	And we have these quotes here where the chief justice, the fifth chief justice of the United States, his name is Roger B. Tanny.
	He's often considered to be one of the worst Supreme Court judges ever because of what he says in Dred Scott v.
	Sanford.
	But that's all bullshit.
	He's actually an incredible, incredible justice.
	He's the symbol of what I'm And the idea, could I make a comment here?
	It's basically because people are judging him by today's standards, whereas with all the realities that happened because of this man.
	as opposed to looking at it through the goggles of his time, really.
	Well, it's even beyond that because all he was doing was trying to follow the constitution.
	So if you want to point at something and say racist, don't point at him, point at the constitution.
	The slave importation clause is very, very, very clear that the African black slaves were not considered part of we the people at all.
	And Roger Tanny is not saying anything new.
	He's just saying what, you know, he's just saying what's obvious.
	He's saying what was already there.
	He's not saying anything new and he's not responsible for shifting the culture in a certain direction.
	He's he looked at the information and he made a determination based off of the obvious evidence and facts of the situation period.
	And he wasn't even a slave owner.
	Of the nine chief justices at this time, five of them were slave owners.
	Tanny was actually in the minority.
	He was not a slave owner.
	He had actually already released his inherited slaves by this point.
	And I think he even said in a case that he doesn't he doesn't have slaves.
	He doesn't want to have slaves.
	So his personal opinion is actually the totally opposite of what you see in this case., and the reason why is because he's not going based off of what's in his mind or his opinions.
	He's going strictly based off of the law, the precedent, the past and the constitution only and exclusively.
	In fact, Chani was very good at staying within the confines of what he should be doing and not going outside of the confines of what he was supposed to be doing in terms of what he was allowed to do with his office and the constitution.
	So with that said, these are the quotes from that case, and you can see how clear this is.
	The words people of the United States and citizens are synonymous terms and mean the same thing.
	They both describe the political body who, according to a Republican institution, form the sovereignty and who hold the power and conduct the government through their representatives.
	They are what we familiarly call the sovereign people and every citizen is one of this people and a constituent member of this sovereignty.
	And this quote is actually the quote that I use now whenever anyone calls me a sovereign citizen, which all the bar cards, because they're such fucking lazy, dumb, ignorant pieces of shit, they like to just call me sovereign citizen all the time for everything.
	I say anything and I show all the original definitions and oh, sovereign that's their answer for everything.
	I'll go on and I'll write a whole book and the whole thing is just Keyes law and definitions all tied down and their answer is, oh, he's a sovereign citizen.
	That's how fucking retarded they are, right?
	So whenever they use that now, I just like last week, I released a sovereign citizen rebuttal.
	The rebuttal to being called a sovereign citizen is just, yeah, sure, according to how Roger B. Tanny defines it.
	That's fine with me.
	So whenever I get called a sovereign citizen, I just list this with this quote and I say, yeah, sure.
	Sure.
	Roger B. Tanny says that I'm a sovereign citizen.
	So yeah, I'll be a sovereign citizen, but this is going to be the definition for that term in this court case.
	You're not going to use some FBI website horse shit that isn't even case law.
	If you're going to call me a sovereign citizen, we're going to use this as the definition.
	So go ahead and keep calling me that, you stupid fuck.
	Continuing on this case, he says here, the question before us is whether this class of persons described in the plea and abatement compose a portion of this people and are constituent members of this sovereignty.
	We think they are not and they are not included and were not intended to be included under the word citizens in the constitution and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States.
	This is their dread spot, right?
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	On the contrary, they were at that time considered a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race and whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the government might choose to grant them.
	Now he's not saying this because it's it's Tianny's opinion.
	He's just saying like this is history, bro brother.
	Whether you like it or not doesn't matter.
	Okay.
	So just keep that in mind.
	In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times and the language used in the Declaration of Independence show that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people.
	nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.
	It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race, which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted.
	But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken.
	They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.
	He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic whenever a profit could be made by it.
	This opinion was at that time fixed and universal in the civilized portion of the white race.
	It was regarded as an axiom in morals as well as in politics, which no one thought of disputing or supposed to be open to dispute.
	And men in every grade and position in society daily and habitually acted upon it in their private pursuits as well as in matters of public concern without doubting for a moment the correctness of this opinion.
	And in no nation was this opinion more firmly fixed or more uniformly acted upon than by the English government and the English people.
	They not only seized them on the coast of Africa and sold them or held them in slavery for their own use, but they took them as ordinary articles of merchandise to every country where they could make a profit on them and were far more extensively engaged in this commerce than any other nation in the world.
	Very clear.
	Very, very, very clear, right?
	The last quote that I usually talk about from Dred Scott v.
	Sanford is this one here, but there are two clauses in the constitution which point specifically, point directly and specifically to the Negro race as a separate class of persons and show clearly that they were not regarded as a portion of the people or citizens of the government then formed.
	And then you see that in two areas.
	You see it in the slave.
	importation clause and then you also see it in the three fifths clause constitution.
	Thank you.
	These are the two areas that Tanny is speaking about when he says that there's two areas in the constitution that show specifically that they are not considered a part of the people.
	I can't, let's see here, maybe it's this one here.
	There we go.
	Any person who is not essentially a free white person counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation.
	And that's part of the constitution as well.
	And that's what, and then that one, and then the slave importation clause.
	Those are the two areas that Mr. Tanny is speaking about when he says.
	There are two clauses in the constitution which point directly and specifically to the Negro race as a separate class of persons and show clearly that they were not regarded as a portion of the people or citizens of the government then formed.
	Got it.
	So that was a very, very striking thing.
	And this was not the reason why the civil war broke out, but it was a big part of it accelerated us into the civil war very rapidly after that point.
	This is definitely a turning point that pushed us more into essentially the civil war, right?
	So we're going into the civil war.
	We're coming out of the civil war now.
	A question before we go there, like what was it about this specific judgment that got us into the civil war that they're saying that essentially, you know, negroes., as they put it, like were not full people or they didn't have a classification.
	Well, they can't become citizens and their children can't become citizens.
	Okay.
	So basically your whole bloodline's fucked, essentially.
	Okay.
	Got it.
	So they had to go into the civil war in order to, that was one of the issues that was to be resolved by the civil war.
	Well, the primary issue in the civil war was should the South be able to have slaves?
	The South wanted slaves and the North didn't want the South to have slaves.
	The South said, fuck you, we're going to create, we're going gonna break off and create our own fucking country then.
	Go fuck yourself.
	That was the Confederate States.
	And then that's the Civil War.
	You have the Union in the North, which is the original America that was there since 1776.
	And then you have the South, which was breaking away as the Confederate States, which basically was creating a whole new country by taking all of the Southern States and breaking them off and saying, you guys can have your country up north with no slavery, and then we're just gonna have our country down south and it's gonna have slavery.
	And Lincoln, Abraham Lincoln didn't like that.
	He didn't like the idea of the South breaking off and becoming a separate country.
	And he was like, no, we're not doing that.
	And that's the breakout of the Civil War.
	And then the Civil War went on for, I think, four years, something like that.
	And then as we're coming out of the Civil War, you have this thing called the Reconstruction, which was very extensive in terms of everything had to be reconstructed.
	The South, which had ceded from the Union, they had to bring it back in, and it had to reconnect back into the Union.
	So the entire country was essentially rebuilt during that time period.
	uh the the the the thirteenth The 13th Amendment, the 14th Amendment, and the 15th Amendment all came out at the same time, right around that same time, right after the Civil War, because it was all part of the Reconstruction.
	How do we figure this out?
	How do we give black people the released slaves?
	How do we give them some kind of citizenship?
	What was happening was they were freed after the 14th Amendment was released.
	But the problem was is they couldn't gain citizenship.
	Basically what that meant was they could be treated like shit, beaten, killed practically, and no one could sue or have any protections at all.
	They had no protections at all whatsoever from the white people.
	I mean, you could just kick their front door in, walk in, start beating up their whole family, you know, shoot their kids and walk out.
	And there really wasn't anything anyone could do about it because they weren't citizens and they couldn't gain citizenship.
	So the blacks, the negro slaves of the time period, they were actually kind of in worse shape after the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendment than they were when they were slaves because when they were slaves they were protected by their owners.
	So they had even less protections after being freed than they did when they were slaves.
	And because of that issue and the core of that issueue was the Dred Scott v.
	Sanford case.
	There was a case that was done to try to fix all of this and try to give the colored people of African blood something to protect them.
	And the case that figured all this out was the case called the slaughterhouse cases.
	And the slaughterhouse cases is essentially where they said in the case, and we're going to read a lot of the quotes on this, it's very important.
	It's the most important case that's ever happened in the entire history of the American culture.
	This is the birth essentially the 14th Amendment was the birth of the U.S. citizen class, but when the 14th Amendment was released, there was so much confusion and no one really understood what the hell the 14th Amendment was trying to do.
	this case was the first case where they clarified all that.
	So the U.S. citizen category was created technically with the 14th Amendment, but because there was so much confusion and because people just couldn't figure it out, it wasn't really clear as to what that even meant until the
	And in this case, they describe in great detail what exactly is a U.S. citizen and why are we making it and what's it supposed to do and how's it supposed to work right so here's the here's a quote and you know this guy here is a great guy another great guy to take a look at samuel freeman miller this is the guy who um is giving this opinion on this case right samuel freeman miller uh was a doctor and he was teaching himself um uh
	law and uh he taught himself law and then he became part of the he taught himself law for five or ten years while he was a doctor at the same time he got into I think the courts at some point in time, then he got into on July 16, 1862.
	Abraham Lincoln nominated Miller to the Supreme Court.
	And then he served in the Supreme Court for 28 years.
	He died October 13, 1890 at the age of 74.
	So he started in the Supreme Court 1862 and the slaughterhouse cases is 1873.
	So eleven years into his 28 years on the Supreme Court, we have this case called the slaughterhouse cases.
	Now, now, mister Miller felt very, very strongly about freeing the slaves and he had been for a long time.
	In fact, the reason why he got into law and became a justice and moved his way all the way to the Supreme Court was because he wanted to use that power to free the, these slaves.
	He was very, very, very politically motivated by freeing the slaves and had been since the beginning.
	And as far as I'm concerned, it's the whole reason why he even taught himself law that he literally taught himself law as a doctor, got into the judicial system, moved all the way up the ranks to the Supreme Court, was in the Supreme Court for 11 years all leading up to this moment in the slaughterhouse cases.
	And that's why I believe of all of the Supreme Court justices that were on the Supreme Court at that time, he wasn't the chief judge.
	He was an associate judge.
	They had him be the one to give this final opinion because he had been working for this for like over two decades.
	For all this conspiracy theory people out there who think that, you know, all these judges are all pieces of shit, it's just not true at all.
	Mr. Miller cared so much about, I mean, he was just, he would die.
	He devoted his whole life.
	to trying to figure out how to release the negro slaves, like literally, like he is the reason why they're even not in chains.
	I'm dead serious, right?
	So with that said, here's what mister Miller has to say in the slaughterhouse cases, right?
	The first section of the 14th article to which our attention is more specially invited opens with a definition of citizenship.
	Now he's talking about the first clause of the 14th amendment.
	And, you know, everyone has read this a million times.
	And just for the viewer, I just want to clarify one thing.
	This is what our entire current citizenship system is based upon, correct?
	The slaughterhouse cases is the absolute dead center core of all citizenship legally, the entire passport system, all of immigration, everything all the way down.
	If you dug with a shovel and you dug and you dug and you dug until you couldn't dig anymore, complete solid rock, there's nothing below.
	You can't go one millimeter farther.
	be in the slaughterhouse cases okay and and just to you know and just to be clear i had researched this i mean this is still active everything you are saying is still in effect.
	It is not, you know, a new case hasn't come along and nullified anything within here.
	So yeah, if we go to the Foreign Affairs Manual, Foreign Affairs Manual quotes from Supreme Court regarding citizenship.
	I don't know if we're going to be able to find it that easily.
	Let's see what comes up.
	Oh, wow.
	Yeah.
	So 8FAM 102.3.
	This is unclassified documentation from what's called the Foreign Affairs Manual, which is basically a manual that explains the functionality of our passport system.
	Eight FAM 102.3 is entitled Supreme Court decisions.
	If you go down into the various Supreme Court decisions, you'll see letter C right away.
	they list the slaughterhouse cases.
	Got it.
	You'll see some other ones here.
	But you see there's not very many.
	There's just a handful of cases for this first section.
	The first section is entitled early Supreme C Court decisions on extent of acquisition of U.S. citizenship at birth under the Constitution if born within the United States.
	We have one, two, three, four, five, six, seven different quotes that are listed.
	One of the quotes is the slaughterhouse cases, as you can see in subsection C. Got it.
	And this quote that they list here, we are going to be reading as well.
	It recognized that the abrogation of the infamous Dred Scott decision, which had held that descendants of slaves were not included as citizens under the constitution.
	Right.
	So with that said, yes, it not only is the slaughterhouse cases, the slaughterhouse cases is just as active today, right now, August 8, 2025, as it was in the afternoon of April 14, 1873.
	And for, I don't know why people find that to be shocking.
	It's not shocking at all.
	There's tons of case law.
	There's case law from 1790.
	There's case law from 1802.
	A lot of our financial system is built still to this day off of case law from the early 1800s and the late 1800s.
	There's a series of cases called the legal tender cases, which occurred right around the Civil War.
	Those cases are literally the entire substructure of Federal Reserve notes.
	What's in your wallet?
	So the idea that this stuff from the 1800s is not still active is just completely hilarious and ridiculous because most of the serious substructure of all our current law is from stuff from 150, 200 years ago.
	So that's just ridiculous and the same.
	With that said, like I said, the 14th Amendment, all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
	So you always see people being like, oh yeah, so that means all anyone born or naturalized in the United States.
	It's all just one citizenship.
	Well, no, not at all.
	We've already established we, the people in the preamble.
	And then you go into the slave importation clause and all of a sudden it's these persons.
	And then the 14th Amendment says persons.
	And the 13th, the 14th, and the 15th all came out at the same time.
	And the 15th Amendment was to give voting rights specifically to the blacks.
	So the 13th Amendment was to release the blacks.
	The 15th Amendment was to give the blacks voting rights, but then, oh, all of a sudden, the 14th, which uses the word persons, is for the whites too.
	No, that's ridiculous.
	It absolutely wasn't.
	And mister Miller was very clear about that.
	So we're going to read that here.
	The first section of the 14th article, to which our attention is more specially invited, opens with a definition of citizenship.
	Not only citizenship of the United States, but citizenship of the states.
	No such definition was previously found in the Constitution, nor had any attempt been made to define it by act of Congress.
	It had been the occasion of much discussion in the courts by the executive departments and in the public journals.
	What he's saying is there's a lot of confusion on this and nobody seems to know what the fuck is talking about.
	That's what he's saying right here.
	He's like everybody's talking about this.
	Everybody's confused basically, right?
	It had been said by eminent judges that no man was a citizen of the United States except as he was a citizen of one of the states composing the Union.
	Those therefore who had been born and resided always in the District of Columbia or in the territories, though within the United States were not citizens.
	So what he's saying is that up until this point, if you weren't born in a state what is considered the territory of the United States.
	So areas like Guam, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Swains Islands, District of Columbia.
	These are areas that aren't considered states.
	They're considered the District of Columbia or the territories.
	Anyone born in those areas doesn't have any type of sort of citizenship because they're not states.
	Those were not considered one of the sovereign nation states composing the Union.
	So if you weren't born in a state, you had no citizenship and there was no such thing as this US citizen up until right now.
	And we're going to talk about what they're talking about here.
	Then all the Negro race who had been recently made free men referring to the thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth amendments were still not only not citizens, but were incapable of becoming so by anything short of an amendment to the constitution to remove this difficulty primarily and to establish a clear and comprehensive definition of citizenship,
	which should declare what should constitute citizenship of the United States and also citizenship of a state, the first clause of the first section was framed referring to the first clause of the first section of the 14th Amendment.
	This is the paragraph he's referring to right here, right?
	So the first observation we have to make on this clause, meaning this clause, is that it puts at rest both the questions which we stated to have been the subject of differences of opinion.
	It declares that per sons may be citizens of the United States without regard of their citizenship of a particular state and it turns the Dred Scott decision by making all persons born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction citizens of the United States.
	If you're still confused, here's where he gives it to you that its main purpose was to establish the citizenship of the Negro can admit of no doubt.
	and you can see here everyone in all these cases they're all arguing about what it means subject to its jurisdiction he fucking tells you what it means right here the phrase subject to its jurisdiction was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers consuls and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the united states that fucking simple You've never heard anyone talk about that
	because nobody fucking knows.
	and nobody knows even where to look and this is the case right the next observation is more important in view of the arguments of counsel in the present case it is that the distinction between citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state is clearly recognized and established.
	Not only may a man be a citizen of the United States without being a citizen of a state, but an important element is necessary to convert the former into the latter.
	He must reside within the state to make him a citizen of it, but it is only necessary that he be born or naturalized in the United States to be a citizen of the Union.
	So what that means is if you're born in the District of Columbia or Guam or Puerto Rico, that's okay.
	You're going to have this other class of citizenship called a US citizen class.
	If you would like to become a state citizen, which is only for what's called a free white person, all you need to do is just move into the state of which you want to become a citizen of as a white person, and you're going to go through all the same steps as anyone else who's going through the naturalization act of 1802.
	You're going to go through that process, which means you have to basically reside in the states for five years, one year in the state where you're going to become a citizen.
	So if you were born in the District of Columbia and you want to become a citizen of California and you are white, you're going to move into California and you're going to be, the way it works is you're a resident for five years.
	And then after you're a resident in California for five years, you become a citizen and then you no longer are a resident.
	At that point, your residence becomes a domicile.
	And this is really important because the only people who can pay taxes, the only people who can vote under the 15th Amendment, the only people who can have a driver's license are residents, state citizens who are white who are actually domiciled in a state are not allowed to have a driver's license they're not allowed to pay taxes and in fact if they do any of that they should go to prison for up to three years for a felony violation of 18 usc 911 18 usc 911 states whoever
	falsely and willfully represents himself to be a citizen of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for more not not more than three years or both so in order to file let's say a w nine tax form you have to state under penalty of perjuryury, I certify that I am A US citizen or other US person defined below.
	Let's go down below and take a look at what that means.
	Definition of a US person.
	The first one here, an individual who is a US citizen or US resident alien.
	So what does that mean?
	It means that if you were born in the District of Columbia or in Guam or in American Samoa, you would be a US citizen.
	You are essentially going to become a resident.
	If you're naturalizing into a state, you would only be a US resident alien for the first five years of you being in here.
	So you could have this W9 form filled out the first five years you're here.
	If you're born in France and you moved to California and you're a white person and you don't want to be a U.S. citizen, you want to be a state citizen, totally fine.
	But the thing is, you would have to pay taxes the first five years because you're not a citizen yet.
	Once you become a state citizen and you complete naturalization process, if you continue to pay taxes after that point, you would become a felon under 18 USC 911.
	That also includes driver's licenses.
	You have to prove that you're a resident.
	in order to get a driver's license.
	If I attempted to prove that I am a resident of California, I'd be going to prison for up to three years.
	I can't have a driver's license.
	It's physically impossible.
	And people say, oh, well, Brandon, how do you drive?
	Well, U.S. citizens don't have the Ninth Amendment.
	Only state citizens have the Ninth Amendment.
	And we can get into how that works later in this.
	The Ninth Amendment is basically your, it is your driver's license.
	The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
	The Ninth Amendment is your concealed carry permit.
	I can't get a concealed carry permit.
	I'm not a U.S. resident alien or U.S. citizen.
	You have to be one of those to get a concealed carry permit.
	You have to be one of those to pay federal income taxes.
	You have to be one of those to get a driver's license.
	You have to be one of those to get a license to practice law, a license to practice medicine.
	State citizens cannot have any of those things.
	They don't need them.
	The Ninth Amendment is the license that they need for all of those things.
	Fishing license, don't need it.
	You've got a Ninth Amendment.
	Driver's license, don't need it.
	Got a Ninth Amendment.
	It's not just don't need it.
	It's I'd go to prison if I tried to get one.
	So it's a very different lifestyle.
	The Ninth Amendment, that's it.
	That's your license to do literally everything.
	You can't hurt people.
	You can't lower other people's standard of living.
	You can't harm people or create damage to other people under the Ninth Amendment.
	That would be a common law claim.
	That'd be a cause of action.
	But anything that would not fall under those categories all falls under the Ninth Amendment.
	And there's so many people.
	in the sovereign movement that are like, oh, you don't need a driver's license.
	That's bullshit.
	If you're a state citizen and you have one, you're a fucking felon and you should be behind bars.
	State citizens cannot.
	Oh, yeah, you don't need a driver's license.
	No, that's complete fucking bullshit.
	If you're a state citizen, meaning you're a white person who's a citizen of a state and you have a driver's license, you should be put in jail.
	for up to three years.
	You should be behind fucking bars.
	If I was on the jury, I'd be putting you behind bars.
	You'd be in prison.
	White people are not allowed to have a driver's license.
	White people are not allowed to pay federal income taxes it's not i used to say like a lot of the sovereign crowd uh income taxes are voluntary yeah it says that but that's not the reality the reality is u.s citizens and resident aliens have to pay income tax and white people if they do it they're going to prison if you're white and you live and you were born in a state and you're paying federal income tax if i was on your jury you'd be going to prison wow crystal clear Crystal
	clear, right?
	So, so, so here's the next line from Mr. Miller on the slaughterhouse cases.
	It is quite clear then.
	then that there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual.
	And really, the circumstances is A, are you white or not?
	That's the first question.
	And B, are you in a state or not?
	That's it.
	When he says they depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual, he's saying their race and their location.
	If you're black and you're of African descent and you're in California, sorry, but the only thing you're ever going to be able to become is what's called a permanent resident, which is what you see on all the tax forms.
	You see that on the driver's license application, permanent resident.
	The term permanent resident means you aren't fucking white and you can never, ever, ever become a state citizen.
	It's completely racist and it's just a big fuck you.
	That's the term permanent resident.
	You're a resident for five years.
	If you read the Naturalization Act of 1802, you're a resident for five years, then you become a citizen.
	Okay?
	So here's the next line.
	You can see how clear this is.
	He's going to say it over and over and over in different ways.
	He's trying to be as clear as possible.
	We think this distinction and its explicit recognition in this amendment of great weight in this argument because the next paragraph of this same section, which is the one mainly relied on by the plaintiffs in error, speaks only of privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States and does not speak of those of citizens of the several states.
	Of the privileges and immunities of the citizen of the United States and the privileges and immunities of the citizen of the state and what they respectively are, we will presently consider, but we wish to state here.
	that it is only the former which are placed by this clause under the protection of the federal constitution and that the latter, meaning state citizens, whatever they may be, are not intended to have any additional protection by this paragraph of the amendment.
	So the 14th Amendment basically doesn't apply at all.
	For white people.
	to white people.
	So for white people, it's the first, sorry, the white people, it's the first 10 amendments or?
	That's correct.
	The 14th Amendment is basically the Bill of Rights for Negroes.
	That is actually a...
	That is actually a mind-blowing way to put it, really well put.
	The 14th Amendment is like basically the first 10 amendments for white people all for one in one amendment specifically for the released negro slaves.
	So by using any sort of 14th Amendment provision, you're telling the government that you are a released negro slave of African descent.
	dissent you're not white if you use the 14th amendment they say okay great so you're not white thank you and that includes all of title 42 by the way all of title 42 is only for the released negro slaves under the 14th amendment so and i can prove that to you very rapidly we're going to get into that in just a moment so last line here from the slaughterhouse cases If then,
	there is a difference between the privileges and immunities belonging to a citizen of the United States as such and those belonging to a citizen of the state as such.
	The latter, meaning state citizens, must rest for their security and protection where they have heretofore rested, for they are not embraced by this paragraph of the amendment.
	And he doesn't need to talk about the rest of it because if you don't, if the first one doesn't apply to you, none of the rest does either.
	And that's why he doesn't go into each individual section.
	Section one is all he needs.
	He's like, it's not for white people, fuck you.
	What are you doing?
	It has nothing to do with you.
	This is specifically for the blacks because they're in even worse shape now than they were before they were fucking free.
	That's why we're doing this.
	Okay?
	So then the next day, so April 14th, well, we can get into this case.
	This comes from the California Supreme Court.
	It's a case called Ellen R. Van Valkenburg versus Albert Brown.
	this is this was in California Supreme Court around that same time period obviously a lot a lot was happening um so they're trying to figure it out right very very clear very very clear i use this one in California a lot uh just because it's so clear it's clear.
	This justice, William T. Wallace, he did a great job in making this just fucking absolutely crystal clear.
	No white person born within the limits of the United States and subject to their jurisdiction or born without those limits and subsequently naturalized under their laws owes the status of citizenship to the recent amendments to the Federal Constitution.
	The history and aim of the 14th Amendment is well known and the purpose had in view in its adoption well understood.
	That purpose was to confer the status of citizenship upon a numerous class of persons domiciled within the limits of the United States who could not be brought within the operation of the naturalization laws because native born and whose birth, though native, had at the same time left them without the status of citizenship.
	These persons were not white persons, but were in the main persons of African descent who had been held in slavery in this country or of having themselves never been held in slavery where the native...
	native born descendants of slaves prior to the adoption of the fourteenth amendment it was settled that neither slaves nor those who had been such nor the descendants of these though native and freeborn were capable of becoming citizens of the United States obviously the case that that established that was Dred Scott versus Sanford.
	The 13th Amendment, though conferring the boon of freedom upon native born persons of African blood, boon means benefit, the benefit of freedom, had yet left them under an insuperable bar, which means impossible to overcome bar as to citizenship.
	And it was mainly to remedy this condition that the 14th Amendment was adopted.
	And then the so so so we have the slaughterhohouse cases, that was it.
	That was the.
	I mean, they're pretty clear, like they're the, it's pretty.
	So, so basically, 13 onward is basically for who was formerly slave.
	Non whites.
	Non whites, got it.
	Because he, he talks about that in the slaughterhouse case, I don't have that on this page, but if I go to the case law resources, he actually describes that as well.
	But I don't typically talk about that because it gets a little confusing.
	But it, in order to really understand it, you have to, you have to look at this.
	It's another, it's another quote in the slaughterhouse cases this year.
	We do not say that no one else but the Negro can share in this protection, meaning the protections of the 14th Amendment.
	Both the language and spirit of these articles, meaning the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendment, are are to have their fair and just weight in any question of construction.
	Undoubtedly, while Negro slavery alone was in the mind of the Congress which proposed the 13th Article, it forbids any other kind of slavery now or hereafter.
	If Mexican peonage or the Chinese coolie labor labor system shall develop slavery of the Mexican or Chinese race within our territory, this amendment may safely be trusted to make it void.
	And so if other rights are assailed by the states, which properly and necessarily fall within the protection of these articles, that protection will apply, though the party interested may not be of African descent.
	But what we do not say.
	But what we do say and what we wish to be understood is that in any fair and just construction of any section or phrase of these amendments, it is necessary.
	to look to the purpose, which we have said was the pervading spirit of them all, the evil which they were designed to remedy and the process of continued addition to the constitution until that purpose was supposed to be accomplished as far as constitutional law can establish it.
	So what he's saying here is also very interesting.
	He's saying, this might seem a little weird and it might seem a little convoluted, but this is the best we can do under the constitutional restraints.
	We can't redefine citizenship.
	We're not allowed to do that.
	This is the best we can do, basically, is what he's saying, right?
	Which is true, one hundred percent.
	They weren't pieces of shit.
	They really weren't.
	They were they were really trying they they were not willing to do anything unconstitutional at all.
	So they were trying to figure out how we fix this thing without without you know we can't fuck the constitution at all.
	We can't.
	It's impossible.
	So we gotta figure something else out.
	Right.
	So we have the slaughterhouse cases on april 14 of 1873 the very next day, april 15, 1873.
	We have a case called Bradwell v.
	State Supreme Court case, which is also given the final opinion was also given by mister Miller.
	Now we're going to see him put the slaughterhouse cases into action 24 hours later.
	This is what Mr. Miller has to say.
	The record in this case is not perfect, but it may be fairly taken that the plaintiff asserts her right to a license on the grounds, among others, that she was a citizen of the United States and that having been a citizen of Vermont at one time.
	she was in the state of Illinois entitled to any right granted to citizens of the latter state.
	So you can see there's a lot of confusion.
	People aren't used to what's going on yet.
	And Mr. Miller is going to try his best to kind of get everything straightened out.
	It's obviously complicated.
	Right?
	So she's trying to get a license to practice law and there's confusion because she's saying she's a citizen of the United States, but she might not realize just yesterday that was redefined completely.
	It doesn't mean what she thinks it means.
	Right?
	And so he's saying that she was a citizen of Vermont, probably her birth state, but then she's also saying she lives in Illinois.
	So we actually have three different citizenship classes here at play.
	Right?
	So here's what mister Miller has to say about that.
	As regards to the provision of the constitution that citizens of each state shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states, the plaintiff in her affidavit has stated very clearly a case to which it is inapplicable.
	The protection designed by that clause, meaning the 14th Amendment, as has been repeatedly held, has no application to a citizen of the state whose laws are being complained of.
	If a plaintiff was a citizen of the state of Illinois, That provision of the Constitution, meaning the 14th Amendment, gave her no protection againstctions under the 14th Amendment, you also have no duties under the 14th Amendment.
	Taxation, driver's licenses, fishing licenses, business licenses, license to practice law, license to practice medicine, license to do anything is all under the 14th Amendment.
	So you don't have the right to do any of those things as a white state citizen.
	You can't do any of those things.
	You don't have any of the protections of the 14th Amendment because you don't need them.
	They've got nothing to do with it.
	The 14th Amendment has absolutely nothing to do with you.
	And anything attached or under the 14th Amendment, such as federal income tax or driver's licenses, also have nothing to do with you.
	You can think of driver's licenses and fishing licenses and concealed carry permits.
	Think of it like France.
	It's like French licenses.
	You wouldn't go to France to get a license to carry a gun.
	It's the same.
	It's just so ridiculous.
	When you really understand how this works, it's got nothing to do with you if you're a white guy and you're in a state.
	It just has absolutely nothing to do with you.
	And it's even more serious than that.
	You become a felon by possessing those licenses and you should be put in prison.
	the reality of the situation so people people talk a lot of shit and they say things like oh I'm not gonna get a driver's license.
	I don't need it.
	It's way more serious than that.
	If you have a driver's license, but you say you're a white man in a state as a state citizen, you should be behind bars.
	Tell you the truth.
	You really should.
	That's where you should be.
	I got a practical question before we continue because this is amazing and it seems as though if you ever had problems you could always cite this stuff to restore your rights let's say some crazy cop you know like what happened to me you know what i mean like so what do you do when The cop or the authority doesn't know all this information.
	They do something stupid like arrest you for not having a license, arrest you for, you know, I guess, you know, saying that, hey, you don't have a CCW when it's illegal for you to have a CCW.
	You just got to sue them basically at that point, right?
	For the restoration of your rights and damages.
	So what's happening is, is they're attempting to, to procure you into committing a felony under 18 USC 9-1-1.
	So for example, if a cop pulls me over and says, you need a driver's license, I'd say, oh my God, that's the officer.
	Are you attempting to procure me to commit a felony violation of 18 USC 9-1-1-1?
	am not allowed to have a driver's license if i had a driver's license right now you would have to arrest me There would be no other options.
	I would be arrested and arreigned for a felony violation of 18USC 911, which would be up to three years in prison, which is the same level as low-level manslaughter.
	So 18USC 911, having a driver's license as a white state citizen is a serious felony.
	It's low-level manslaughter.
	It's on the same level.
	Low-level manslaughter is up to three years in prison.
	H.N.U.S.C.
	901 is up to three years in prison.
	So think of it as manslaughter.
	That's how serious it is.
	You're at work.
	You're using, you know, you have big, huge machines.
	You're responsible for fixing the machines.
	You were drunk or didn't sleep very well one day and you didn't fix the machine very well.
	The machine exploded, killing.
	another employee that would be like manslaughter probably right having a driver's license as a white state citizen is on that same level in terms of the disciplinary actions that you could be facing criminally.
	It's a criminal violation.
	Now for the officer, it's even worse for the officer because if the officer attempts to procure another to commit any perjury, he's guilty of subordination of perjury and he can now be imprisoned for up to five years.
	So if an officer pulls you over and you're white and you're a state citizen and he says you need a driver's license, he's putting his own throat on the chopping block, big time.
	Subternation of perjury, 18 USC 1622, right?
	So, so, so procures another to commit any perjury.
	And then 18 USC 911 is essentially a type of perjury, right?
	Because you're saying something or representing yourself as something that isn't true.
	So that's how I would handle that situation, right?
	I can't have a driver's license.
	If I tried to get one, I'd be going to prison.
	End of story.
	Okay.
	Now, continuing on this Bradwell v.
	state, because it's a really interesting case that shows the slaughterhouse cases in action, the plaintiff seems to have seen this difficulty and attempts to avoid it by stating she was born in Vermont.
	While she remained in Vermont, that circumstance made her a citizen of that state, but she states at the same time that she is a citizen of the United States and that she is now and has been for many years past a resident of Chicago in the state of Illinois.
	Resident means non-citizen.
	It means you're there, but you're not a citizen, right?
	Would you not?
	We do not here mean to say that there may not be a temporary residence in one state with intent to return to another, which will not create citizenship in the former.
	But the plaintiff states nothing to take her case out of the definition of citizenship of a state as defined by the first section of the 14th Amendment.
	In regard to that amendment, counsel for the plaintiff in this court truly says that there are certain privileges and immunities which belong to a citizen of the United States as such.
	Otherwise, it would be nonsense for the 14th Amendment to prohibit a state from abridging them.
	And he proceeds to argue that admission to the bar of a state of a person who possesses the requisite learning and character is one of the things which the state may not deny.
	So he's basically saying, this is all bullshit.
	This has nothing to do with us because none of this falls under the 14th Amendment because she's a fucking state citizen.
	And you can see here the definitions of domicile and resident, you can see right here, I have them for you because you really have to understand these.
	Domicile, the place where a man has his true fixed and permanent home and principal establishment and to which whenever he is absent he has the intention of returning just like he said what did he say he says we do not mean to say that there may not be a temporary residence in one state with intent to return to another which will not create citizenship in the former Domicile,
	not for a mere special or temporary purse, but with the present intention of making a permanent home for an unlimited or indefinite period.
	Here's another definition under domicile.
	Domicile and residence, however, are frequently distinguished in that domicile is the home, the fixed place of habitation, while residence is a transient place of dwelling.
	A state citizen wouldn't have a residence.
	That's why everything is resident or residence, even California voting.
	Everything.
	Voter registration, driver's license, everything.
	All of it.
	A U.S. citizen and resident of California.
	A released Negro slave and foreigner who's not really domiciled here in California.
	That's what this is saying.
	Those are the people that can vote because voting is under the 15th Amendment, which is only for the Negroes.
	Do you see state citizen, a free white person who is a state citizen?
	Do you see that anywhere on this list?
	Every single one says a U.S. citizen and then more shit.
	A U.S. citizen and a member of the uniform.
	A U.S. citizen and an eligible spouse.
	A U.S. citizen and an activated national guard.
	A U.S. citizen residing outside the U.S. temporarily.
	A U.S. citizen residing outside the U.S. indefinitely.
	A U.S. citizen.
	has never resided in the us Don't you find that one kind of interesting?
	I mean, so you can't like as a white person, you can't vote.
	And obviously, I know a lot of us think that it's useless voting, but how do you address that?
	If I voted, I'd be going to prison for 18 USC 901.
	I'd be going straight to fucking prison, bro.
	I'd be in a cell getting butt fucked by Bubba in about 10 minutes.
	I can't vote.
	So that whole conversation, I know it's big in the manga movement.
	Is it worth voting?
	Is it not?
	It's totally irrelevant for me.
	I don't even want to talk about it.
	It's got nothing to do with me.
	I'm not going to fucking prison for manslaughter.
	I ain't going to prison for fucking voting.
	Same thing.
	Yeah.
	You ain't going to see me in the voter booth because I don't want a dick in my ass.
	Real simple.
	Not complicated.
	It's not complicated.
	It's not complicated at all.
	I mean some of us feel that way after voting so so resident slash residence here's some definitions further clarifying the difference as domicile and residence are usually in the same place they are frequently used as if they have the same meaning but they are not identical terms for a person may have two places of residence as in the city and country but only one domicile.
	Residence means living in a particular locality, but domicile means living in that locality with intent to make it a fixed and permanent home.
	Residence simply requires bodily presence as an inhabitant in a given place, while domicile requires bodily presence in that place and also an intention to make it one's domicile.
	Your domicile, if you're domiciled in Utah, but you have, you know, you have a vacation home in the Hamptons, you have a vacation home in Naples, and you have a vacation home in San Diego, that means you have your domicile, which is Utah, and then you have three residence homes.
	So your actual citizenship would be, you wouldn't be a US citizen, you wouldn't be a citizen of New York, you wouldn't be a citizen of Florida, you wouldn't be a citizen of California, you'd be a citizen of Utah.
	who is a resident in New York while he's at his Hampton home, who is a resident of Florida when he's at his Naples home, and who is a resident of California when he's in his San Diego home.
	But let's say.
	you decide, fuck it, I don't want to live in Utah anymore.
	I'm going to shift my domicile from the Utah home to the San Diego home.
	You have now become a citizen of California.
	And now when you're in your Utah home, you would be a resident of Utah at that time because now your domicile is located in California.
	And now your other three homes in Utah, New York, and Florida all become residences.
	The problem is everyone says everything is a residence all the time.
	My lease here for my apartment says resident all over it.
	Residence parking is the sign above, this is not my residence.
	Never has been.
	This is my domicile.
	Completely different.
	Only white people can domicile.
	So when everything says resident or residence, it's actually extremely fucking racist.
	And that's not just some like liberal bullshit.
	The word resident or residence is like seriously racist as fuck, the way that it's used in today's society.
	And you see it all of the news.
	Local residents, residents, residents, it's like literally a hypnotism term, resident and residents.
	I am not a fucking resident, and neither are you, and neither is fucking anybody else.
	And to say that as basically saying, fuck the blacks, in my opinion, that's the way I look at it, right?
	It's racist as fuck to use the word resident.
	Because most people don't have five fucking vacation homes.
	Do you know what I'm talking about?
	Totally, totally.
	So you're, because a resident is supposed to be your not permanent home.
	home, you're not permanent location.
	You're basically it's almost like elitism to assume that people have residences.
	That's correct.
	And here's a last definition, very clear here.
	Residence me demands less intimate local ties than domicile, but domicile allows absence for an indefinite period if intent to return remains.
	Holding that residence and domicile are synonymous terms, residence has and domicile may have an identical or variable meaning depending on subject matter and context of statute.
	So they're going to basically what this says is they're going to gaslight the fuck out of you.
	If you start saying domicile versus residence and all the stuff I'm talking about, they're just going to gaslight you.
	Oh, no.
	Residence doesn't mean that.
	It just means where someone lives, but it's all bullshit.
	There's domicile and there's residence.
	White people who are citizens of a state domicile in that state.
	The blacks have no ability to domicile.
	They are basically blocked forever from domiciling.
	So theoretically, this is actually kind of interesting because my domicile, you have to be five years somewhere for it to be your domicile, right?
	Yes.
	Okay.
	So I bet is it like five years permanently you've been there?
	Well, where were you born, though?
	Weren't you born in America?
	Where were you born?
	I was born in Canada, Toronto.
	Okay.
	Yes.
	So if you want to be a state citizen, Well, it's five years in the states, one year in the state of which you complete your.
	Okay, okay.
	I was trying to figure out because theoretically I'm still a resident by your definition of California, but I'm domiciled in Nevada.
	That's what it sounds like.
	How long have you been in Nevada?
	Five years.
	And how long have you been in the United States?
	Oh, like since like 89 or something.
	So that fifth year that you were here, so you arrived, what year did you arrive in the United States?
	Like 89.
	And where, what state were you in in 94?
	California.
	And how long had you been in California in 94?.
	Five years.
	So you were a citizen of California in 1994.
	Okay, got it.
	And you were domiciled.
	At that point in 1994, your residence con converted into a domicile and you just didn't even know it.
	Got it.
	And if you had a driver's license, you should have turned that in 1994.
	You should have let the IRS know that you'll no longer be filing a tax return in 1994 because if you did, you'd be going to prison.
	If you had a fishing license or concealed carry permit, you were you were supposed to turn all those in 1994 would have been the point when you have to turn everything in.
	You can't have any of that shit anymore.
	Okay.
	A few other quotes here that are interesting, but we've already really, I mean, this is so clear.
	I mean, we've already established this.
	And then I go on and on and we get into all sorts of definition of the word negro.
	in great detail.
	What does it really mean?
	it doesn't really mean anything uh when you get down deep into it uh it's basically a black man with a certain amount of And they didn't have DNA tests.
	And the way they determined it was like craniologists and like eugenics, basically it was bullshit.
	So the definition of the word negro really, I mean, at the end of the day doesn't really even mean anything because you can't prove it.
	And it was all just bullshit.
	So it's just eugenics, like literally, like full-blown eugenics.
	Wow.
	So.
	Then in 1886, we have a case called Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad Company.
	This is the case where they expanded the definition of the word persons.
	sons to include legal fictions such as corporations, trusts, associations, partnerships, companies.
	And since Santa Clara County versus Pacific Railroad Company, that's pretty much it.
	The definition of the word person has been pretty much the same since 1886.
	And here's the tax code definition of the word person.
	The term person shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation.
	This word individual, it only has two meanings.
	A non-white.
	A white person wouldn't be included in the definition of the word individual or a special kind of corporation called a sole proprietorship.
	And the way that you can prove that is you go to 26 CFR 701 301.7701-11.
	And you're going to see here that it says, for purposes of this chapter, the term social security number means the taxpayer identifying number of an individual or an estate.
	So the SSN is just an EIN for two types of entities, an individual or an estate.
	Now we're going to go over to the SS4 form, which is the application for EIN number.
	And we're going to go down and we're going to look at where it has the various types of entity in box 9a.
	And we're going to look for these two types of entity, the individual and the estate.
	Estate is right here, SSN of decedent.
	Great.
	So now all we need to find now is the last thing that the SSN could possibly apply to, which is called an individual.
	Where do you see that at?
	Do you see it on there?
	Sorry, tiny letters.
	Individual?
	No.
	Sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, personal?
	Yeah, no, there's no individual.
	Well, this one says SSN.
	Do you see the other one that says SSN?
	Sole proprietorship.
	Bingo.
	So for the purposes of this chapter, the term Social Security number means a taxpayer identifying number of an individual or estate.
	We take that and we go over here.
	you see a state.
	So now we only have one thing left to find, the term individual.
	They say SSN right here.
	So that means by process of elimination, the term sole proprietorship and the term individual mean the same thing.
	We go on the IRS website and look up IRS definition of sole proprietorship.
	It's a an unincorporated business.
	So Brandon Joe Williams in all capital letters is an unincorporated business called a sole proprietorship.
	I'm not a business, separate from me.
	That sole proprietorship is a person.
	That sole proprietorship is an individual.
	And that individual has an EIN number called a social security number.
	And that's how it works.
	Okay.
	So you, okay, and this is what you're talking about when we're, when you're saying that you say my name is Brandon I'm a white guy and you say what representing a sole proprietorship or presenting you have it it's no different than having a business you you say oh I'm a business owner you're the you're the business owner of Brandon Joe Williams in uppercase basically that's correct which is a sole proprietorship and that sole proprietorship is the
	individual if they use the word individual that's got nothing to do with me I'm the owner of that thing I'm the business owner but but I am not myself by myself an individual.
	There is no definition anywhere that conclusively points to me using the term individual.
	Got it.
	The only term that points, the closest term that points to me within the statutory system is owner.
	The owner of the sole proprietorship.
	Okay.
	I'm the owner of the individual.
	Do you see?
	And that's how it works.
	So is this uppercase sole proprietorship, is that authority?
	Is that a 14th Amendment soul proprietorship?
	I mean, what legal castigation?
	Okay, got it.
	So you're basically a one to tenth Amendment white person presenting a 14th Amendment soul proprietorship.
	100%.
	And that's as per that's that that's the way it's been since Santa Clara County versus Southern Pacific Railroad Company 1886.
	That's what they expanded that definition of the 14th Amendment to include the legal fictions.
	So you had this really like funny saying where I'm just what was it?
	I'm just a white guy living my best white life.
	Yeah.
	Not that guy with a sole proprietorship.
	You know what I mean?
	That's all it is.
	It's that simple.
	You know what I mean?
	Okay.
	Illustrate to us a little bit in practicality.
	I mean, you're not, you don't have to have a driver's, as long as you could obviously explain this legal argument.
	I mean, that's part two of my question is how do you deal with this when you deal with dumbskulls that don't understand these laws?
	But practically speaking, you know, no driver's license, no taxes.
	You got a legal argument to get out of all that nonsense.
	It's not a legal argument to get out of it.
	It's that you're not even allowed to have it.
	I don't want to be a, yeah, I want to be a felon.
	Yeah.
	I don't want to go to prison as a felon.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	How do you, I mean, how do you deal with it when you're dealing with some stupid cops?
	I don't really deal with cops.
	They never bother me.
	But if I did, it would just be, you know, I'm not, I'm not, I'm not a felon.
	I can't have a driver's license.
	If I did, I'd go to people going to prison for three years, 18 UC 901.
	I mean, I the reason why I don't have a driver's license, uh, officer is because I follow the law.
	That's the only reason why I don't have it.
	I mean.
	And if they gave you a ticket or whatever, you just go to court and show this information.
	Yeah, I go to court and I'd be like, it's it's the officer's trying to get me to commit felonies, Your Honor.
	And it's a felony violation of 18USC 1622.
	And I would go down to the DA's office.
	I'd file a 18USC 1622.
	I'd call the FBI.
	I'd file an actual federal complaint, criminal complaint.
	And then I would take that criminal complaint and I would enter it as evidence into the state case.
	And I'd say, I already filed a criminal complaint with the FBI, Your Honor.
	The officer is attempting to suborn me essentially into committing an 18USC 911 violation.
	And I'm just not going to break the law, Your Honor.
	I don't want to go to prison.
	I'm a law-abiding state citizen.
	I'm a white guy with a sole proprietorship and I'm not going to prison and I'm not getting buttfucked and not happening.
	So it's almost like white privilege, what they call white privilege by today's standards are embedded within the law.
	Like if you're a white guy, you have to take your white privilege or you're going to jail.
	It's literally like the most white privilege that like, like, like whatever liberals think white privilege is, you can times it by like 20 million.
	literally like what he people don't need drivers' licenses.
	White people don't need fishing licenses.
	White people can't pay taxes.
	White people, if you're, I could throw someone on this table right here and perform brain surgery on them legally.
	As long as you don't hurt them.
	Right now.
	Yeah.
	Well, if it's contractual and the contract says, you know, this is a dumb fuck who doesn't know a damn thing about brain surgery.
	And I know that.
	I'm going into it.
	I already know that.
	They'll probably fucking kill me or turn me into a vegetable.
	If you have them sign that and they sign that and they're not drunk or fucked up and they sign it like upside mind.
	I'll throw him on the slab right now and do a brain surgery right here.
	laughter
	And there's not a fucking thing the FBI can do about it.
	There's not a fucking thing the CIA can do about it.
	There's not a fucking thing the police can do about it.
	And there's not a fucking thing the sheriff's office can do about it.
	Not a fucking thing.
	Okay, these legal questions, I mean, judges aren't used to seeing this stuff i mean but your hope is that like these are the things that they're constantly going to be faced with because they don't i'm sure modern judges don't know slaughterhouse they don't know the implications they don't know these two class of uh a state citizen versus a us citizen uh i mean it seems like the world is in for quite a learning curve because it seems as though certain elements of slaughterhouse were embedded into our laws but a lot of it was kind of like just
	brushed under the rug and now you're you seem like you're the guy that's bringing this all back the state citizenship class was brushed under the rug um but everything else is very active i mean but but state citizenship uh was was essentially brushed under the rug after slaughterhouse because because slaughterhouse created that federal u.s citizen category which is under congress the entire purpose
	of the u.s citizen category is actually very simple the federal government wanted to prevent the states from treating the blacks like complete shit.
	So a U.S. citizen is in California.
	He's getting beaten by the cops.
	He can't do anything.
	He can't sue anybody.
	He gets treated like shit.
	No one will hire him.
	If there was a minimum wage, didn't apply to him.
	Fuck you.
	You're only going to get a dollar an hour, you black piece of shit or whatever it was, right?
	So what the U.S. citizenship class was was it was a special federal citizenship class.
	So the federal government can protect the blacks in the states.
	Because the reality, by the way, and this is where we have to think in terms of that time, was that most states would have probably been like, hell no, we're not going to make black citizens.
	So federally, they had to do it to create a classification.
	So all the states, you know, whatever, southern, I mean, northern states, I'm sure would be fine.
	Some southern states would be like, no way we're giving these black people equal rights or whatever.
	So they did something really good, but within that, you still have white privilege that's basically First Ten Amendments held all the way up here and you don't have to do all that 14th Amendment stuff that's really for the freed slaves or black.
	I mean, it sounds like it's not just freed slaves, but black people, different ethnicities, people that are not European white by definition.
	Non-whites.
	It's really non-whites.
	Yeah, the white privilege here is unbelievable.
	The white privilege is so far beyond anything.
	The speed limit signs don't even apply to white people.
	So if I'm like racing down the road, I'm going 150 miles an hour.
	Cop pulls me over.
	Obviously, he might even impound my car.
	They might throw me in jail, but then I show up to the court.
	I say, what they just did is BS.
	I charge them for my time.
	I said, okay, I just spent 72 hours in the slammer.
	I charge, you know, whatever, $300 an hour.
	Here's the bill, basically.
	Yeah.
	So the speed limit signs are based off of the California Vehicle Code.
	The California Vehicle Code is based off the 14th Amendment.
	Okay.
	Got it.
	So, so white privileges, you don't even need to stop at stop signs.
	I mean, don't do that.
	You're going to get yourself hurt.
	But I'm just saying, you literally don't even legally need to stop at stop signs as a white person.
	I'm not kidding.
	So I got to ask this.
	You know, obviously, you know, I was called the third assassin by Sheriff Chad Miyamco for having guns and all that.
	So I mean, all I basically had to be like, yo, I'm a white guy because his whole thing was, oh, you're carrying unlawful guns and, but, you know, because they have 14 bullets instead of 10 according to some weird California statutory laws that I didn't even know about.
	But I don't know if you know that, but apparently in California, they have to make every gun custom-made because everywhere else it's 14 bullet chambers or whatever.
	For non-whites, yeah, that's true.
	Yes.
	So I should just be like, yo, I'm white.
	That's correct.
	If you're white and you're a citizen of Nevada, well, that's an interesting conversation because you would.
	you that's an interesting conversation because you would technically be a resident in California.
	Oh, so now because I'm visiting, I'm a resident in California, so now I'm under 14th Amendment.
	Uh, no, you know, that's a that would be a very good that's that's beyond anything I've ever even talked about.
	That would be that would be a very interesting, complicated.
	That would be like Bradwell v.
	State.
	The one where she's saying she's a US citizen, but she was born in Vermont, but she's resident in the state of Illinois.
	That would be sort of like a complicated.
	It would be a very similar situation.
	But ultimately, the answer would be no absolutely not you you wouldn't be needing to worry about the 10 bullet whatever it is in California you'd be you'd be basically in the same class that I'm in I could manufacture machine guns and sell them legally oh wow selling machine guns to us citizens probably wouldn't work I'd only if I manufactured machine guns I'd only be able to sell them to white
	people.
	Got it.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	This is quite an education man.
	Is there anything else we need to go over?
	No, I mean, the treatise goes on and on and on, and then they started to incorporate all of the white man's rights of the Bill of Rights back into the US citizen category.
	But a lot of those rights have not been reincorporated.
	The ninth and tenth amendment have not been reincorporated into the incorporation doctrine.
	So, you know, as you go down that treatise, you'll see I go through a lot of those cases.
	I walk you through qualified immunity.
	Qualified immunity for the police is based off of the 14th amendment.
	The original case, I think it's like actually a case where there was a bunch of black and white, but they didn't care about the white people.
	They only care about the black people that went to like Tennessee bus stop or truck stop and they peacefully protested by having the black pastors go into the whites only bathroom.
	And the police got involved and that case is the case that created qualified immunity for the police.
	But what's funny is that qualified immunity is off the 14th Amendment.
	So if you are a white state citizen.
	and cops don't have any qualified immunity with you whatsoever, nothing.
	So yeah, have them break out your window and spray paint your face with pepper spray.
	And I'll be sitting there smiling the whole time, brother, because they have no qualified immunity with me.
	Wow, wow, wow.
	I mean, has anybody ever used the?
	No.
	Nobody's used it.
	So every time when people are suing, I mean, I know when we're suing the government for different things, as I've had to after being called a third assassin and all that, we're going in there as like 14th Amendment citizens.
	That's correct.
	But we're not even following these laws.
	And by the way, they probably don't know either of the judges.
	So it's like we're in for a whole learning curve right now due to this discovery.
	That's correct.
	Now, it gets complicated because they can't build juries with state citizens.
	The juries are all U.S. citizens.
	So, for example, you can't do a grand jury indictment on me.
	If I went downstairs right now and shot somebody in the face with a machine gun.
	uh and i got picked up for for for murder one and possession of a machine gun they wouldn't even be able to indict me because the thing is is that they they can't build a grand jury with U.S. citizens to indict a state citizen, they would only, they would literally, they would have no choice but to basically like bring back the grand jury indictment system from 150 years ago.
	They'd have no other option.
	They couldn't indict me.
	There'd be no way to indict me through a grand jury indictment.
	They'd have to build.
	uh rebuild the old grand juries from the 1800s that were composed only of white state citizens in order to and then and then if they get gave me a grand jury indictment i'd also have the right to a jury trial the entire jury would have to be white state citizens.
	So one black person on the jury and I would call for nullification.
	It would be a mistrial.
	That is just crazy, man.
	I can't wait till that actually makes it to court.
	What do these woke judges do?
	I mean, they're going to have a conniption.
	Oh, they're going to, they're going to just literally full, full meltdown.
	Full.
	This shit is so.
	embedded.
	There's so much Supreme Court case law.
	This is not like one little sentence from one obscure case that I'm going to have to like stretch to make it work.
	No, this is.
	This is the I have explained to you guys the entire substructure of everything.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	I got to bring this up, man.
	When we're hanging out, you're making me laugh my ass off because you're talking about you always do.
	I mean, you're one of the I mean, obviously, you know.
	You're talking about how the bar crew cart graveyard, how it is your goal.
	Like, so, so this is, okay.
	I brought up to Brandon that I'm like, man, a lot of these things are so like revolutionary that you found.
	I mean, this is going to really drive a lot of lawyers nuts and I pass the mic to you sir.
	Yeah and I think the way I responded was that attorneys are like the second or third highest self-offing in the world and I and I said I'm very proud that I'll be contributing to that number I want to get that into the first place.
	Wow.
	I want to get that into the first place category.
	That's my plan.
	Yeah.
	You know, it reminds me of the guy, I think Miller was a guy like self-taught, you know, you're similar, you're self-taught.
	It seems like a lot of good, you know, it seems like the universities are spitting out bar agents or bar card holders, you know, you call them bar card holders, I call them bar agents.
	Whereas this studying the law through the methods that you've done, I mean, it's so much more liberating, it would seem like, because it seems like you're put in a prison through those schools.
	Whereas the stuff you're discovering, I mean, this is next level.
	Yeah, so as you learn more and more about Mr. Tianney and Mr. Miller and these guys, they're pretty much all self-taught because back then there wasn't such a thing as really very many law schools.
	Harvard was one of the really the only ones.
	Harvard has a really rich history.
	Fuck.
	I just more than you'd ever even imagine.
	And what's crazy is.
	is 33 or 35 of the 52 people or 55 people or whatever it was that made up the constitutional convention were all attorneys.
	So what's crazy about this country is, yeah, attorneys are really evil now.
	It's just horrible.
	But the birth of the constitution is a gift from attorneys.
	But the difference is the difference between an attorney that cares about the country and loves the country and wants this country to be something beautiful and an attorney that is basically a piece of shit that sucks the lifeblood out of decent human beings and decent men and women legally to basically for whatever weird bullshit thing that's in their head or whatever it is.
	It's basically just comes down to intent, right?
	So I think in today's world, I think, you know, like I said, I want to bring attorneys, you know.
	exiting this planet from the second or third place that it's in now.
	I want to bring it to first place.
	But the thing is, is that the thing is, is that the origination of attorneys is the literal foundation of the entire constitution.
	If you love the constitution, I mean, by definition, you love attorneys.
	It's just what that term attorney means is very different now than it was then, obviously.
	Right.
	It was just like everything else, once it became an industrial complex, that's where it just becomes a, I mean, it becomes a destruction machine.
	And these discoveries couldn't have come at a better time because I think people have just lost faith in the law, man.
	As somebody that was just almost framed, I mean, for trying to be an assassin having done nothing, I know how crazy the system is.
	And this is, I mean, this is all a real blessing for us to know this knowledge now.
	Is there anything that we didn't touch upon that's worth going over, Brandon, before we wrap up this episode?
	As a white state citizen, you could have a belt-fed M60 machine gun locked and loaded in your back seat, and there ain't a fucking thing anybody can do about it.
	When I go to court, I just have to state that I am Van Miller, domicile in Nevada, and I'm representing my sole proprietorship.
	I'm here representing, I'm here presenting my sole proprietorship.
	No, you would say that the sole proprietorship didn't, the sole proprietorship wasn't involved in any of that.
	Okay.
	The presumption is that the sole proprietorship rolled up in there and had this illegal gun and all this bullshit.
	The sole proprietorship can't be a white state citizen.
	Wow.
	Okay.
	So basically I say I'm a white state citizen, then Miller, dummy.
	And you're going to say any presumption that I'm a resident, any presumption that I'm not white.
	any presumption that I'm a U.S. citizen, any presumption that I'm under the 14th Amendment is all bullshit.
	I can't have anything to do with the 14th Amendment, just like Mr. Miller says in Bradwell v.
	State and in the slaughterhouse cases, if I tried to use the 14th Amendment in any way, shape, or form to protect me in this case.
	This case, it would be a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. 901, and I would be basically arrested here, right here in the courtroom, and I'd be escorted into the prison to await arrayment.
	So I don't want to do that.
	Yeah.
	Wow.
	The sole proprietorship wasn't there.
	The sole proprietorship had nothing to do with the interaction that you had with Chief Bianco.
	And you need to say that because that's going to be the presumption.
	The presumption is the 14th Amendment sole proprietorship is the one that is the defendant.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	So interesting.
	I mean, do you think they did this intentionally or this is just the way it ended up because of the starting point of the constitution and that they didn't have black people in there.
	Well, I think if mister Miller were to come back into the today's world, I think there should be a cartoon mister Miller returns and it's just him and he would be the one with this face painted with two machine guns just running into Washington, DC just mowing down everybody like grenades and shit.
	Like I think that would be I think mister Miller would be what would they consider to be a domestic terrorist.
	He would be like he would ironically become the ultimate domestic terrorist.
	He'd blow up the buildings, literally.
	Literally, he'd be so fucking pissed.
	What would he be pissed at the most from what you know about him?
	He was not intending for any of this shit to go like this at all.
	He just wanted to free the blacks.
	That's all he wanted to do, man.
	I'm telling you.
	I'm telling you.
	He wanted to leave the white people alone.
	Don't worry, white people.
	I'm not going to violate the constitution.
	You guys got your shit.
	This has got nothing to do with you.
	This is just to keep the black people from getting beat and killed and destroyed and fucked with and framed and everything else.
	That's it.
	That's all this is.
	Wow.
	And it's all been twisted into like the craziest thing, perpetual conflict, basically.
	It's been twisted into everyone's under the 14th Amendment and then every single government agency is under the 14th Amendment.
	FDA, CIA, the FBI, the entire police.
	There was no police before the advent of the US citizen category.
	There were only the sheriffs.
	Sheriffs are for white people, police is for nonwhites.
	So you hear about guys like Cameron Wilson and all these guys driving while black and like all this stuff.
	It's 100% true.
	The police were literally created to essentially fuck with non-whites.
	I'm not kidding, literally.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	Fascinating.
	Fascinating.
	Is there anything else, Brandon, we should go over?
	No, that's it.
	This is awesome, man.
	This is, I know this one's going to get a lot of views, man.
	There's so much great information here.
	The way you presented it was great.
	I thought I was going to have to do a bunch of post-production and put up all this stuff, but you pretty much did it for me, man.
	Yeah, hell yeah.
	Thank you.
	It's easy.
	It's easy.
	It's something that I'm, I think I'm getting pretty good at explaining and it's really fascinating.
	And I think, like you said, I think, I think people are, I call it Trump betrayal syndrome.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I mentioned it when I was having dinner with you.
	And I think a lot of MAGA people are experiencing that.
	And that I will say.
	If you're a MAGA guy and you are experiencing Trump betrayal syndrome, meaning that you're feeling like you are being betrayed by Trump or the Trump movement for any reason, you'll probably be very happy to find my platform yeah yeah i almost feel like this was um i mean whether intentional or not like we're facing an existential crisis i mean that it's really turned into like an attempted spiritual cultural white genocide that's what we're seeing you know what i mean and
	you know now it's changing a little bit now we got you know what's her name you know sydney sweeney like a regular pretty pretty white girl that you know we should all like it's as if like a white girl with huge tits it's like finally we're back brother you know what i mean you know it's funny i remember going to a muslim country for a month and i didn't see a female for a month and when i saw a female eventually because i was out of the muslim country this was like 20 years ago all of a sudden like i'm not kidding every uh pore in my body opened up it was the craziest
	thing right and and that's what i that's what i think is happening right now with hey pretty girl sydney sweeney everybody's going crazy and i'm just like dude she's a pretty like white girl, but like kind of like pretty white girl we grew up looking at in the magazines.
	You know what I mean?
	But the fact that it's all, but it just shows you how bad we've been like kind of white culture.
	You know, it's like, yeah, it's like so horrible.
	You're a bunch of racists.
	And this might be the stuff that saves this country because it ain't going to come from the media.
	Well, isn't it funny that all of that, everything that I'm finding is the basis of the fact that white people have nothing to do with any of the bullshit, but then all of a sudden they have this anti-white kind of interesting, isn't it?
	It's almost like they knew.
	They knew that it's possible this thing could get found.
	And it's almost like they're trying to weld the door shut before somebody finds it.
	And they're like, you know, 40% done welding the door shut.
	And then I'm like, in my pickup, I slam through the fucking thing.
	I'm like, well, hold on a second there.
	No more welding here, brother.
	You know what I mean?
	But it's interesting.
	It is interesting.
	It's an interesting thing.
	And I do want to say one other thing about the whole Trump thing.
	I'm not anti-Trump.
	In fact, I voted for him in 2020.
	It's just he promised a lot of things.
	He promised to get rid of the IRS.
	He promised a lot of things.
	We'll see what he does or what he doesn't.
	But the whole, there is no Epstein list.
	That thing really pissed a lot of people off, man, big time.
	You should see my graphs.
	When that shit came out, there is no Epstein list, bro.
	My shit, fucking like 6x traffic like every single fucking day on like every single fucking platform.
	And I'm telling you, I just, I was like, what is going on here?
	And then I was able to tie it to that.
	And that's when I named it Trump betrayal syndrome.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I think a lot of us are getting disappointed, man, you know?
	Because this is the last, like, if I think if this guy disappoints us, I mean, the only option is really what you're talking about.
	I'm already there, you know, but I think a lot of people are going to be looking that way, you know?
	It's the real deal.
	It's the real truth.
	It's not me making shit up.
	It's not me.
	It's not like Brandon's idea.
	It's Brandon has dug up what America really is.
	And it's just been under a lot of sand for a long time.
	But this is it.
	This is the real deal.
	This is like you could take this shit into a court of law and there ain't a fucking thing they can do about it.
	This is the real deal.
	It's not just like Brandon's idea of what things should be.
	This is the law at the highest level that no one knew was there.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	King Picklefuck his excellency.
	It's always an honor, a privilege to have you on the Blood Money podcast, man.
	And I look forward to, man, I look forward to doing a lot more work.
	I've been actually dreaming of this music video with the pickle guy.
	And there's just so much cool shit we could do.
	I'm hoping my time opens up in this near future so we could do some cool viral shit together, man.
	I'm down.
	You talked about a documentary, too.
	down for that.
	We could do a whole historical timeline of We could do a whole thing on Dred Scott.
	We could add that in.
	that he was uh trying so hard he he went all the way through the lower courts all the way through the appellate courts all the way into the supreme court trying to get his rights as an emancipated slave and just make it cool and fresh and fun and make it like a very very you know like a netflix documentary style but with this information um that'd be cool as fuck Yeah, I was just writing that down, man.
	That would be cool.
	That would be cool.
	I mean, everybody does, you know, we've been in this whole conspiracy truth world because every conspiracy we thought was a theory turned out to be true.
	So now that, like, I mean., it's pretty much what else is there to expose?
	I think it's time to teach people because I think we've exposed the shit that it's been, the steaming pile of shit that it's been.
	And let's talk about how do we free ourselves from that steaming pile of shit, really?
	Yeah.
	And just to be clear, the fact that America is a white privileged country, if everyone gets educated and we all decide we're going to sit down and kind of like.
	you know restructure the government or restructure whatever we're going to figure out we're going to do we can always change that too there's that that's not set in stone all we would have to do is just get rid of the u.s citizen category entirely, which would automatically revert us back to the Naturalization Act of 1802.
	Federal Reserve notes would disappear immediately.
	The SEC would disappear immediately.
	All of Wall Street would disappear immediately.
	The FBI would disappear immediately.
	The police would disappear immediately.
	The DMV would disappear immediately.
	All taxation would disappear.
	All licensing, any sort of licensing would disappear.
	Property taxes would disappear.
	You'd have the county recorder.
	You'd have the sheriff's office and you'd have the courthouses.
	That's all that would be left.
	Everything else would instantaneously evaporate.
	Now, from that point, if we decided as a culture that we didn't want this whole free white person thing, all you have to do is just remove the fact that someone has to be a free white person to become a state citizen.
	Just remove that one little line, leave everything else the same.
	We've got a brand new country.
	We've handled everything.
	Everything's gone.
	We've completely rebooted the entire country.
	Federal government's almost gone.
	Federal Reserve's gone.
	Federal Reserve notes are gone.
	The police are gone.
	There's no traffic tickets.
	There's no HOV lanes.
	There's no speeding limits.
	There's no taxation.
	There's no licensing.
	There's nothing.
	And then we would go back to gold and silver coins, but we have things like crypto stable coins that are backed by gold and silver.
	Just use one of those and now we can keep.
	So the money that we have day to day would be these things now, gold and silver coins, but we don't want to lose our Postmates and our Amazon's.
	So we would use crypto stable coins would become part of the actual currency system.
	Gold and silver would be the base.
	And then right above that, just one millimeter above that, would be the crypto stable coins and then the crypto stablecoins would be infused into a new monetary system and we can keep our electronic payments we can keep our auto pays we can keep our amazons or postmates there would not even be a blip that would take away all of the conveniences that we enjoy today wow wow Amazing
	stuff, brother.
	Amazing stuff.
	Thank you so much.
	I look forward to doing a lot more work, guys.
	You know, I expect the people out there expect in the next few months, you know, in the next few weeks, my schedule is going to clear up.
	I'm going to rev up with a few things and we're going to start dropping a few things in the next few months that are collaborations between the amazing pickle men yours truly and a lot of our mutual friends i guess you know uh brandon thank you so much uh for the viewers out there.
	Thank you for joining us for this Blood Money episode.
	Make sure you check out americahappens.com where we have all of our featured episodes.
	I will see you all on the next episode of Blood Money.
	Take care.
	Take care.
	Lyre, lyre, hands on fire.
	The LLW, third assassin, closer.
	Lyre, lyre, hands on fire.
	The LLW, third assassin, closer.
	My lots, and the roots of the people love me.

▲