Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 14, 2024 - Blood Money

24:03

How the Uniparty Tried to Stop JD WIlson - Blood Money Episode 251

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	🎵 Outro Music 🎵
	So I was a Republican candidate for Michigan District 1 United States Representative.
	And when we turned our petition signatures in, essentially what happened is they were challenged and we made our reply to the challenge.
	But then we got a letter about a week and a half later from the election board basically telling us that we had Our petitions didn't meet their requirements and that all of our petition sheets were being thrown out.
	So we threw about 1,700 live signatures that we had manually gathered from folks, good intentioned voters, and they threw all of our signatures out.
	At the end of the day, there were five findings.
	We had three paragraphs that were found to be 1 72th.
	The font for the paragraphs was found to be 1 72th of an inch too small, based on the 1954 definitions of the font.
	And we had findings that...
	We had one typo, which was a two-character typo that didn't really happen.
	It was inconsequential. And then we had two items where it essentially said that we were in violation of the law.
	But in reality, we were in violation of a guide that was put out by Michigan Secretary of State that defines how to create those petitions.
	And the guide conflicted with the law.
	So we followed the law, but we kind of found that, you know, had we followed the guide, they would have just said that we were in violation of the guide.
	So it was kind of a sticky situation.
	We have a five minute period to argue our side of those five items that they put in front of us and of course in the five minutes we didn't have a chance so they found against us.
	The only other opportunity to continue the battle would have been to go in front of the Michigan Court of Appeals and we were looking at a minimum $75,000 fee to do that and people were telling us that basically we had a 50-50 chance.
	So at that point We accepted that defeat and we've been, since then, chasing the indiscrepancies in the guide, which is essentially the Michigan Secretary of State.
	And it's also the Attorney General in Michigan is also involved in the decision making on those processes.
	So we've been calling them out trying to get them to fix things so that nobody else winds up in my sticky situation.
	I mean, it sounds like whatever you did in that situation, you were pretty much set up to lose.
	I mean, there was no way you would have made it through.
	Am I reading that correctly?
	No, you're absolutely right.
	We were grassroots candidate going up against the establishment and the establishment didn't want us to succeed.
	So the bottom line is we were on a slippery slope going in the door.
	You know, I'll take responsibility.
	There were mistakes that we made, but at the end of the day, I don't think we ever would have gotten on the ballot.
	Wow. Well, I mean, we hear that sort of thing quite a bit where essentially for us citizens, there's a lot of laws in place that at any time could be used in order to stifle us, in order to cause us financial harm, in order to drag us into courts.
	I think there's actually a book written how Every single day due to the outrageous amounts of laws, a lot of which are actually anti-constitutional laws that go against the Constitution, but that have been layered out there.
	Really, what happens is every single individual is committing something like three to five crimes every single day because it's just been set up for whenever they want to pull that card to make that individual fail.
	And what you're talking about sounds very similar to that.
	Yeah, the catch-22.
	The concept that, you know, it doesn't really work the way we think it works.
	The biggest thing, though, is don't get disillusioned.
	So, you know, we're going to stay in this fight.
	The biggest thing that I worry about is that people say, well, my vote doesn't count.
	And then you wind up staying at home.
	And then basically you fall into the pitfall or the trap that they have for us.
	So don't. Please go out, vote, make it count.
	And the grassroots concept means that every one of you, every single person, has to contribute, has to be involved in some way to get your beliefs through.
	And if you're not at that level, you need to be.
	Because that's what makes America, America, is every one of us getting involved.
	Don't let the big powers take us over.
	Yeah, I mean, what was so offensive about your policies, about your approach, that it seems like an establishment really ganged up against you to prevent you from even running for office?
	Well, toward the end of position, and you know, it's one of those things, the more you get into it, the more you know, and the more you know, the more you don't want to know.
	But essentially, everybody's selling us out.
	So in our case, we were running against an incumbent Republican for a Republican seat.
	And the reason was because in his first three terms, he had a spectacular voting record.
	In the last term, his net worth went up $2.5 million, and his voting record went equally in the toilet.
	What's going on is we're being bought out on both sides.
	And that is very scary.
	And the media is, mainstream media is essentially complicit.
	And that was one of the things that we were taking on as well, as I think that there are ways that that could be corrected.
	But at this stage in the game, the deck is stacked against those of us who believe that America should be by the people of the people for the people.
	Instead, we have the establishment who are essentially, from our perspective, being bought out by countries like China, and they are voting for things that China wants.
	You know, in Michigan, we put a battery plant in where we started to put a battery plant in at the cost of Michigan.
	There's $795 million to put a plant in for China.
	There's no private industry in China.
	China is a totalitarianism.
	So any company that is a Chinese company is essentially the Chinese government.
	And we spend $795 million to break ground and put this in for them.
	At the end of the day, you had to swear your allegiance to China in order to work at that factory.
	So, no Michiganders are going to go to work at this factory that Michiganders were paying to put in.
	Why? Why would we do that?
	And our Gretchen Whitmer, our governor, was very, very much involved in laying out that plan, as were local officials, and now they're having a great big battle, and the local officials were all ousted, and the battle revolves essentially around violating the Public Meetings Act to make these decisions.
	Now you have to ask yourself, Why would we spend taxpayers' dollars to build a factory on behalf of China that Americans aren't going to work at?
	It just defies common sense.
	There's no logical explanation, except that our politicians are being bought out one by one.
	And it's very, very scary.
	I think grassroots is our only solution.
	And there has been a big upcoming of grassroots candidates.
	And I think that that will be our solution to getting our country back.
	You know, I gotta mention, we did a documentary recently that we just released called Bundy vs.
	Deep State. It's about the Bundy family, essentially their standoff in 2014, how essentially the American government and its different agencies have been working very hard to destroy the American rancher.
	It seems to be part of this World Economic Forum policy.
	And in just the last 30 years, because of said policies, There's been a reduction of 53 ranchers in Southern Nevada back in 1992-93, and currently there's one left.
	And the one that's left, the federal government in 2014, essentially tried to more or less kill off in what was called the Bundy standoff.
	And what we've learned is the reason why there's such corruption within our state and federal government is because the federal government is unlawfully selling and using plots of land to do business with the Chinese and the Canadians and taking from Nevada.
	So this seems to be part of The system of how it really works, where even though we have certain laws in place, once people come into power, they're really just working to facilitate their own wealth.
	And in Nevada, there's a gentleman by the name of Harry Reid that passed away who was Senator and Speaker who was part of this fraud.
	So, I mean, this is rampant.
	It seems as though we're looking at corruption on the levels of what was happening in the fall of the Ottoman Empire, where it's pretty much, if we don't fix all this stuff, I don't know how you do a U-turn on all this corruption, really.
	There's so much money in it.
	That is the problem.
	So how do you turn that corruption around?
	And, you know, we have to start with election reform.
	We can't have single entities able to put millions or hundreds of millions of dollars into campaigns.
	That alone just defies...
	We get into the common sense concept, right?
	You're defying common sense if you're going to allow entities to influence people like me to vote.
	For them. That's not the American way.
	And the problem that we have is everybody has their price.
	I mean, it used to be a joke, but, you know, where is your line in the sand?
	I do not have a price.
	It was one of the big questions that we got on the campaign trail was, how do we know you're not going to sell out on us, too, because we see it over and over and over again?
	And I can tell you that I'm in this for my family.
	I'm in this for the merit.
	I'm not in this for any kind of money.
	I'm not in this to... And I don't plan on getting enriched by being in office, which is one of our problems.
	When people come into office with very little money and leave with a whole lot of it, that in and of itself is proof that there's something going wrong with the system.
	So you're right.
	Where is the reform? And the reform has to start with campaign reform, election reform, because In Michigan in particular, we had jurisdictions where votes were clearly stolen, and because the authority is Democratic, we shoved it all under the rug.
	They'll acknowledge votes were stolen in these jurisdictions, but it wasn't enough to sway the election.
	Well, if you don't fix the systemic problem, Then we're not going to get to a better place.
	And the thing is, is that when our justice system is complicit in the process, you know, again, how do we get back?
	And that's kind of scary.
	I think that at the end of the day, the way we're going to get back is we the people.
	And we the people are going to have to rise up.
	And we rise up through voting.
	I'm not advocating militia.
	I'm advocating voting.
	We need to get out and vote.
	One in five Christians vote.
	That's horrendously well.
	That needs to be five in five Christians voting because Christian ways are what our country is molded around.
	That's where our values come from.
	Whether you're Christian or not, the values agree.
	So, at the end of the day, where is the solution?
	Hopefully with we the people.
	You know, I hate to be Sounding negative, but what...
	I've come to realize, especially in this last documentary that I just mentioned, is the corruption has been triangulated in a way where I don't know how we get out of it because it's been unlawfully ingrained within the system and the judicial branch that's supposed to hold people accountable for that.
	Like, for example, you just mentioned how a Democrat region, they're not even looking at the election fraud.
	Well, in a court of law, that should be committing treason against the laws of your country with Very heavy, scary punishments.
	I mean, that's what that is.
	You're literally committing treason against your own country if you're not stopping voter fraud, right?
	But that's not the way it's adjudicated because the legal system is so corrupt, right?
	Now, let me paint you a picture here.
	We're supposed to have three branches of governments that the checks and balances is supposed to stop.
	What we're talking about, right?
	But when the judiciary is 100% bar agents, I call them bar agents, aka bar attorneys, but they're bar agents because they're working for an unlawful monopoly, really, or they're part of an unlawful monopoly in their private membership or whatever.
	There's things in there that are not, according to our trust laws, like, that's not correct to have this one thing called the bar controlling of all of our legal endeavors, right?
	And then you have Congress, which is 75% attorney, right?
	So that checks and balances that were Congress filled with what was the intention of the founders, I believe, to have, you know, priests and business people and that sort of thing, as opposed to Lawyer, attorney, bar agent dominated, then the checks and balances system would essentially take care of all the issues that you're talking about.
	But that's not what we have. What do you say about that?
	Well, no, I agree with you.
	The checks and balances are a huge and a very important part of our system.
	But if everybody in the checks and balances essentially have the same goal and we're not checking and we're not balancing, then that causes a huge problem.
	So one of our campaign's big causes was the press.
	The reason that the press is called the press is because they're supposed to put pressure on our government to do the right thing.
	Instead, they've become complicit.
	Mainstream media we're talking about in particular.
	I can bring three character letters out, but we're not going to get down that path.
	At the end of the day, Many of them should have to be considered in-kind contributions to the campaigns of the candidates that they're supporting.
	It's become that ridiculous when you're going to ignore the very obvious problems of one candidate and you're going to do nothing but express not so obvious problems about the opposite candidate.
	It really doesn't matter which side you're on.
	That manipulation is occurring in both places.
	We Americans have historically been able to trust our media.
	And it's only these new generations where that is not only being accepted that the media is slanted, but it's become norm.
	It's become the normal thing where I'm outraged when I see an evening newscast that only shows one side of the story.
	My children look at it and it's just normal every day to them.
	That manipulation, that is a form of manipulation.
	The media, where we believe we're getting our truths, is not giving us the truth, but is giving us a slanted picture.
	Then we as people become The football player with our face mask being grabbed.
	We follow. And that is the problem.
	We've got to break loose from that.
	And again, I come back to individual people.
	If you look at the common sense and you start talking to people on the street, people don't agree with what's going on.
	And at the end of the day, the left, the right, really are not that far apart when you start talking about specifics.
	But the hate is being...
	It's perpetuated by mainstream media and by social media.
	And that is what's got to stop.
	And the only way I see that happening is we the people stepping into the plate and saying, we're going to take it back.
	You know, again, you mentioned something there.
	And this is, it's funny because a lot of these pieces we're talking about is ingrained in the history of the America Happens Network, where we do the Blood Money podcast, the one that we're currently on.
	Part of that history is that very early on, about four and a half years ago, we started producing content that started to bring up the question of the media.
	And the perspective I like to bring is, you know, I worked in Hollywood when Jeff Zucker was hired to run CNN and knowing that he was a reality show producer and knowing We're good to go.
	And so we started talking about that and the importance of that.
	And even before that, and I'm speaking about back in the George W. Bush days, when we first launched America Happens, the reason we launched is because of the censorship and cancel culture of that day, which, you know, it's funny because those things that essentially killed off a million Iraqis, Those same techniques are now destroying the United States.
	This has been a long time coming.
	I mean, what do you say about, you know, the fact that we're very docile when 24 years ago, 23 years ago, this really started because it wasn't necessarily affecting us.
	It was affecting these people overseas.
	Well, so actually, Reagan recognized this was going to be a problem.
	And there was something called the Fair Media Doctrine, which essentially said that if you were going to give time to one candidate, you had to give time to the opposing candidate.
	And those doctrines were held until the mid-90s.
	And what happened there was there was an argument over whether or not the FCC had authority.
	Those doctrines were oversaw by the FCC. So there was Basically an argument, a court case.
	You may recall South Park did an episode shortly afterwards where they used the S-word 280 times in a half hour because it was deemed that the FCC did not have authority because you got your television over the cable network and cable was essentially CCTV. It wasn't broadcast.
	Since it wasn't broadcast, they didn't have authority.
	When that happened was the same time that the media started transitioning from News to what you have today.
	So the punchline here is we don't get our media over cable anymore.
	I mean, you may think you are.
	Some of you still have cable boxes hooked up, but the majority of us coming over the Internet.
	So one of the things we were going to push for was looking at ways to set a bar for what really is objective journalism.
	And to reestablish that as the thing to do, rather than the thing not to do.
	You still have the money problem.
	But if you get to a point where you make the right thing, objective journalism, and all of the people, the sponsorship and so forth, are all looking for the right thing, and that becomes the thing to do.
	That was our intent and our hope.
	It is to establish a bar.
	And the tenets of objective journalism are very clear.
	I mean, they're very objective. They're metrics.
	They're very simple to measure.
	So you put those standards out and you say, if you don't meet those standards, then you can't call yourself news.
	You can't call yourself objective.
	If you're going to put an opinion piece out, you have to call it an opinion piece, which is the way it was back in the day.
	How do you get back there?
	That's one of the solutions that we have proposed.
	You get your news now through the internet.
	Yeah, totally.
	It's funny because in that episode, and I recommend people check it out.
	It's called the America Happens Documentary Series Episode 2, We the People vs.
	CNN. We talk about the Fairness Doctrine.
	It seems as though the removal of the Fairness Doctrine is the reason why we're in this mess because there's really no referee.
	It's become... Propaganda outlets at this point.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	Wow. All right. Well, JD, this has been awesome, man.
	It's really great to have you on the Blood Money Podcast.
	Is there anything that we didn't talk about that you want to mention before we wrap it up?
	Just that we are looking at running for the next round, which means come January, we're going to start making a decision.
	Actually, November. We're going to make a decision.
	By January, we're going to start getting back in the game.
	If you're at all interested in checking us out, I'm jdwilson4michigan.com.
	You can check out what we're about.
	You can throw some money at our cause.
	You can join our cause.
	We are absolutely going to try to get the grassroots folks out to take our country back.
	You know, and one thing I want to just mention, you know, before we wrap it up, is this triangulation of the system aspect.
	You know, I mentioned how, you know, in terms of the media and not having necessarily strong voice in the media in terms of the truth.
	But then you have other aspects, like one of the things we noticed in Nevada, and I'm sure this is probably happening over there, too, is how our essentially our The people that are the lawmakers in this country, like the Attorney General, they're pretty much financed by interests from New York, LA, like, you know, wealthy individuals and not grassroots.
	And you would wonder, why is outside states influencing Nevada politics?
	Because by putting that influx of so much money within Nevada, and by the way, these are the same groups that, as you'll see in the Bundy documentary, it's actually a really great companion piece, is how Those same groups that are wealthy individuals in these, you know, essentially New York, LA mostly, are also part of financing environmental groups.
	And then you see things like the Bundy Ranch standoff happen, which is an actual direct assault on the rancher by environmentalist groups.
	So the pieces I'm trying to put together is you have these states essentially triangulated in terms of the elite influencing what's happening, and that's not what even the people of the state want.
	So the reason I mention that in closing is the system structurally is built to facilitate the needs of the elite and not we the people.
	What you're looking at there is essentially a communistic structure almost.
	So until we fix that, and until we fix the inherent issues with not having checks and balances, because basically two branches of our government are essentially captured by the same private secret society, I mean, I don't know.
	That to me is the crux of what we need to fix, and how do you fix that, right?
	But just in closing, what are your thoughts on all that?
	I mean, those are the scary things that when we started to see them caused me to get into this game.
	You want to make a difference, right?
	We can talk about making a difference, but if you don't step to the plate and do something about it.
	And that was why we got in this game in the first place.
	And fortunately, we do have social media.
	We have folks like you where podcasts are coming up and people are starting to tell the truth.
	And the word is finally starting to get out.
	So, that's why we're here.
	Awesome, awesome. Thank you so much, JD, for coming to the Blood Money Podcast.
	And for the viewers out there, make sure you go to AmericaHappens.com, where we're essentially linked up to all the networks that we're a part of.
	Now, we're on Smart TV now with Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire.
	We're also on Rumble, as you guys know, and X at AmericaHappens1, and NotVenMiller.
	Thank you so much for joining us for this episode.

▲