All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 4, 2024 - Blood Money
43:30
A.I. Will Destroy Us. How we stop the A.I. threat - Blood Money Episode 249
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Outro Music
All right, welcome to the latest Blood Money podcast.
Today we have a very special guest, Chris Wright, and the topic of the day is AI. How are you doing, Chris?
Very good. Thanks for having me on, Ben.
Thanks for coming on the show, Chris.
So Chris, let's just dive right into it.
Tell us a little bit about your organization and your background and what you concentrate on right now.
Sure, yeah. I've got a company called the AI Trust Council, and the whole idea of it is to align AI with humanity as far as safety.
In order to do that, we have to create a product that serves people.
And so we do that by helping people figure out what's real and fake online and what's AI-generated versus what's human-generated.
And so that's really the mission is to find truth online and establish some sort of trust.
So I got into this type of work from my background in the military, actually.
I started flying helicopters in the early 2000s for the Army, and I was flying longbow Apache attack helicopters, and ended up doing that for a while and got out of the military and took a break from the military for about 10 years where I served as a contractor in the Middle East and was actually teaching Arab students how to fly the longbow.
I was a ground instructor and simulator instructor in the Middle East.
And so part of that time over there, it was when the United Arab Emirates was getting struck by attack drones from Yemen.
And so these drones were hitting the airports and stuff like that.
And so we were tasked to help train the Arab students how to shoot down these drones.
And so because of that, I had to get familiar with drone warfare.
I had to go to a lot of conventions and stuff like that and try to understand drones.
And so I really saw the progression of drone warfare and where it was going and the integration of artificial intelligence into that type of warfare.
And it disturbed me.
And I think you can see where that is at today.
You know, we have a big problem in Russia and also in Gaza and also in Ukraine with drone warfare being used with AI. So anyway, so I got to think about our current political situation, where we're going as a country, that kind of thing, and realized very quickly, well, whoever's in charge of this Drone warfare system and also AI as a whole will have the keys to the kingdom.
And most people on Earth don't really realize that or not even thinking those terms.
And so I wanted to raise awareness about it.
And so, yes, that's what got me to start the AI Trust Council.
I've been busy doing that.
How much of a risk are we under right now?
It seems like the AI's already, and the drones, the AI, the robotics, has come to a point where they're a genuine threat to humanity.
100%. Yeah, most people don't realize the sophistication of the technology.
I mean, you actually have drones that are, you know, getting PhD-level IQs in warfighting.
And so these drones can come in from all different angles.
They're very creative.
They swarm.
They have... You know, internal communications, it's very difficult to pick up because of the way they fly.
And so the whole drone industry is actually moving towards AI because it's actually more effective than the typical first-person viewer drones.
And so the progression of warfare is turning into basic Terminator 2 style warfare.
And so that movie was really a good warning for us because we're actually seeing details from that movie come to life today.
And so, you know, I work in tech and building out the AI Trust Council website and I run into engineers, senior engineers that are, you know, okay with extinction as a consequence of the technologies and AI that they're building.
And so it's a weird dynamic that's occurring.
And really, people just aren't taking safety seriously enough.
And yeah, so it's a big issue.
I mean, when you talk about like them being, you know, people being okay with extinction, I mean, what's going on there?
That's a weird one. It's really a strange situation.
And for your audience, this is probably one of the most...
We're talking about people that are okay with the suicide of the human race.
I mean, that's what we're talking about, basically, right?
Yeah. I mean, what gives anybody the domain to make that decision?
It's just such an insane concept that somebody would say, hey, extinction's okay.
It's an okay price to pay for AI. By the way, we were told this in 1992 through the Terminator movies.
It's not like we haven't had three decades of warning about this topic.
Yeah, 100%.
It's bizarre.
The argument that I get from when I get into these conversations with people in tech is that it's our natural progression as humans that we will merge with artificial intelligence.
The sooner we do it, the better.
And through that, we will naturally die off.
And so their goal is to merge the species into a digital form, meaning that they will upload our consciousness to a digital cloud.
So therefore, we would be immortal and able to explore the cosmos.
And they actually get into Cosmos talk.
When you go down this rabbit hole.
And so these guys are, you know, they grew up playing Dungeons and Dragons.
They love sci-fi.
They dress up in Star Trek costumes all the time.
There's nothing wrong with that.
But when you take that mentality to the real world, It's like, no, there are actually humans here that live, that don't want to die, that don't want to live out some sort of Star Trek fantasy.
And the argument doesn't make logical sense, right?
Because if you are, let me put it this way, Chris, if you're the guy that invented We're good to go.
Just because you're able to create weapons that destroy humankind, that's like saying the people that created a nuclear weapon all of a sudden have domain over whether human beings live or not because they created the nuclear weapon.
But no, they didn't create humans.
You see what I'm saying?
There's a logic where you would think that these guys that are so intelligent that play Dungeons and Dragons, which you do need some intelligence to do that.
I mean, you think they think a little bit deeper than that, you know?
Yeah, I think that they're very fact-based and they're not spiritually, I don't know, evolved, I guess.
And so they look at details and they're very black and white.
And so they're all about data.
And so when they look into these problems and they look into the future, they compile data and they make decisions off that data.
And so you can take somebody like Bill Gates or Noah Yuval Harari from the World Economic Forum.
Guys like that, they believe in this future of transhumanism.
And it's this merging of man and machine.
And so they're happy to what they call speciate.
And speciate means that they're changing the species from human 1.0 to human 2.0.
So it's like a software upgrade, and that's the way they view it.
But they view that that's our natural progression, and they view humans in our current form as a placeholder for technology.
I mean, we've seen this experiment play out, though.
I mean, you could argue that the pharmaceutical industry was this more perfection of humankind that wasn't doing as well because of not having certain vaccines and pharmaceuticals or whatever.
I mean, we saw that play out.
Turns out that that leads to a bunch of ailments and our over-prescribing of medication, which we thought was going to improve, you know, human 2.0, whatever you call it.
So, I mean, that kind of line of thinking.
Am I being reasonable here?
I mean, you tell me. Does that sense, that line of reason?
Yeah, it's...
And one of the key points, though, is to align our thinking and really understanding the perspective of where they're coming from, like the Bill Gateses and, you know, the Noah Yuval Harari type folks.
And so they actually have played out the AI scenario very deeply in their minds, and they're seeing where the artificial intelligence takes us.
And so if you do that, if you go through that mental exercise of, you know, High IQ robots and high IQ digital agents that are hundreds or thousands or billions of times smarter than humans, you end up with a situation where work is no longer the same.
You know, human purpose is no longer the same.
The way we live is no longer the same.
And so they've taken it upon themselves to engineer the future of humanity to align with these changes in high technology.
So it's not It's not that the technology needs to change, it's that the humans need to change, to upgrade, to adapt to the high technology.
And that's really where they're coming from.
And so a lot of the decision making that you see from these guys is based in this really a dystopian future.
And that's where you start to get into the depopulation mindset, because they think like, well, we have all these people, these humans here on Earth.
We don't necessarily need them all.
And so that's really That's really their thinking.
I mean, it sounds like a bunch of not very well-endowed little men trying to play God.
I'm sorry. I mean, it just sounds like this is their version of a Ferrari.
Yeah, it's interesting.
I mean, you have folks that, you know, like Bill Gates, you know, he's had pies smashed in his face.
You know, he's been made fun of, you know, and I wrote an article called The Geeks Are Getting Out of Hand.
I actually had an article called No Speciation Without Representation.
It was posted on Dr.
Robert Malone's Substack this last week.
But it gets into the details of what is actually going on within tech, and it gets into the details of their mindset.
And it's unfortunate, but it's a situation where you're getting a division of people, where there's a camp that is pro-human, And wants to preserve humanity and then bring AI into alignment with us to ensure that, you know, we stay in control of this technology and that we can dominate it and use it for our benefit.
So that's one camp.
And then you also have this other camp that's not pro-human.
And so if they're not pro-human, it's like, well, what are they?
And so I've started to call them extinctionists because they're perfectly okay with human extinction as a consequence of the development of this technology.
I mean, how do you look at something like this and say this is not more of like a satanic, like Luciferian agenda, if you want to look at it like religiously, because it seems like a bunch of human beings that want to play God and really be Promoting a massive genocide?
Holocaust? I mean, sounds like some psycho stuff.
Yeah, so I think that you can look at the Georgia Guidestones as an example.
It's written there, 500 million total world population is the aim.
And the excuse that they use when you question them on it is that humans have been bad to the Earth.
And in fact, that is true.
You can look at the ocean.
The amount of pollution, plastics and everything.
We're getting plastics in all our bodies because of the amount of pollution.
The air is a mess.
Literally, we're destroying the planet.
But we have high technology today.
And that's one thing they don't talk about.
They don't talk about applying this high technology to solve a lot of these complex problems of pollution and the destruction of the planet.
This is one of the arguments that Elon Musk gets into routinely.
Is that, you know, you have this group that wants to depopulate and then another camp that actually wants to increase the population.
And so with high technology, with AI, with fusion technology, fusion technology is amazing, nuclear, you know, there's a variety of new technologies that are transformational.
If you apply those, you could have free energy, you could have, you know, 3D printed homes, which is something that's coming out.
You know, you can have, you know, Vertical gardens and things like that, that you could feed a lot of families and not deplete the world's natural resources.
It's because we're living in the paradigm of the elite, of the 1% that we're in this mess.
So in a way, they're like, this 1% class is like, okay, use plastic bottles, use plastic, blah, blah.
It's not like you and I were like, hey, we're fine with glass.
I remember when I was growing up, the Pepsi used to come in a glass bottle, you recycled the glass, but then all of a sudden these 1%ers were like, here's all this plastic.
So it's almost like they give you the problem and then the solution to the problem is killing off everybody, where really the solution to the problem should be to create a different paradigm, like the one that you're talking about, where I'm sure with sustainable living standards like that, I mean, this earth could probably sustain...
You know, 30, 40, 50 billion people if it's the right way.
I mean, what would you say? Oh, no, 100%.
I mean, you look at Kazakhstan, you look at, you know, Northern Canada, you look at, you know, a lot of these places around the world, Mongolia.
I mean, it's vast, empty portions of the world.
You know, I've done a lot of international flights and, you know, you stare out the window on the plane.
And you're looking down and there are no lights.
There are no roads. There are no people.
And it's not to say that it's nice to have a natural environment, but this argument of, hey, we've overpopulated and we have to kill everybody off in order to have this utopian future.
It's an unusual, weird, it's almost like a mind virus way of looking at humanity.
And yeah, I think it does get dark and you could almost say demonic.
Why is it that? I mean, I gotta ask you this question.
Why is it that when it comes to movies and things like that, right?
When it comes to movies, we're all against the bad guys that want things like this.
In a movie, like if you're watching a James Bond movie and there's like a bad guy that's like, hey, let's kill off 95% of the population.
You automatically know that that's the villain of the movie, right?
And then we always put ourselves in the James Bond shoes.
We want to go kill that villain, right?
But when it comes to real life, it seems as though people are not willing to stand up against the real villains.
Yeah, I think there's a lot of programming.
There's manipulation of our testosterone.
That's something that's underway right now.
You've got testosterone levels all over the place, especially in the United States, dropping drastically.
So a lot of those protective instincts that you've had in the past are subdued right now.
It's subdued through messaging, and it's really chemical warfare, and then also mind control.
General Mike Flynn came out with a book called Fifth Generation Warfare.
Dr. Robert Malone came out with one called Psywar.
But basically, it's all about psychologically programming the population to remain quiet and remain docile while this unbelievable raping of our planet and humanity is underway.
What is there that we could do about AI and what is the current risk that we face most imminent in terms of what is happening with AI? Right now, we have to get our arms around it.
This is a no-joke, real deal.
It's life or death.
This is about as serious as it gets right now.
It's hard to see it today, and it's hard to see through all the hype, the trillion-dollar marketing budget of a lot of these AI products and services that are coming out.
Are camouflaging the true risk.
And so you can actually get a sense of that risk.
When you look at open AI, you know, you've had 10 alignment or safety and alignment researchers.
These are data scientists that their goal is to make sure that AI stays in alignment, meaning that it doesn't kill us and it stays safe for humans.
You've had 10 of those folks leave, you know, either being fired for For speaking out about the safety or quitting because they're like, hey, we're bringing these issues to the senior management, Sam Altman.
And they're just not getting listened to.
And so because of that, they're like, hey, well, I don't want to be the cause of, you know, the end of the human species.
And so the scary thing is you have senior leaders who are running these tech companies that have this, you know, anti-human mind virus.
I mean, these guys are, you know, okay with extinction.
And I think that, you know, for us as the, you know, we're all riding on a ship together, you know, and my background is aviation.
And so I look at this situation like a You know, aviation, you know, it's all about safety.
It's all about, you know, accident prevention.
And what I'm seeing is we're being about as rambunctious and nuts as you could possibly be from a safety perspective.
And actually, you have diabolical freaks that are, you know, running the ship.
And, you know, so, you know, we're headed towards a cliff.
It's up to us, the people, to say, hey, no, no, no, nice try, guys, but we're not going down with the ship here.
We're going to take the safe option.
And so that's one of the principles in aviation is that if there's two choices, you should try to take the safest choice in aviation.
And that's a decision-making tool.
And so right now, We're definitely not taking the safest choice.
We're taking the most profitable or the choice that actually provides the most control.
And so it's a race of dominance in AI, and it's a race for profitability and market dominance.
And so through that, you know, you have this enormous risk potential unfolding and there's no one slowing it down.
And so it really falls on the people who get it.
And that's actually why I'm building the AI Trust Council and to help, you know, people who have a sense of safety and a sense of, you know, what it means to be a human so that we can, you know, have a network where we can talk, you know, we can weigh in, we can participate in social media and have polling.
And one of the key points of it is that we can highlight safety, AI safety organizations and say, hey, this one's a good one.
And actually, this other one's a bad one because it's actually paid for by big tech.
And so that's actually what's happening right now in the AI safety realm is you have a lot of these safety organizations that are actually funded completely by big tech.
So they're not telling you the real story.
They're not telling you the actual details of of what's going on in AI safety.
Again, if this is a James Bond movie and there's a bunch of sinister geeks sitting there plotting to your Bill Gates' central casting.
They're sitting there plotting to destroy humankind and genocide 95% of the human race.
There would be prosecutions.
These people are sitting there making a genocidal decision.
Shouldn't these people be prosecuted through the courts?
Yeah, and I'm concerned.
I'm concerned with...
Their back is really up against a wall right now.
We have the November elections coming right up, and Trump almost got taken out the other day.
And so I think that you have this do or die kind of moment where you have this separation of camps, where this one camp is just, you know, they're do or die.
And so I think they're willing to almost do anything, including initiate a world war In order to disguise and dominate the situation.
It's like they're hell-bent on making the future into what they want.
And so they have a vision for the future and they don't really want an alternative.
And so Trump and his platform Is an alternative.
And it's a way that we can, you know, safely move through the next four years that, you know, a lot of people don't realize, but the whole point about UN engine to 2030, or, you know, look at the WEF, the World Economic Forum, and they're constantly talking about, you know, 2030.
And it's like, well, why is that year so important?
Why are we so focused on 2030?
And it's really because of artificial intelligence.
And it's because of this unbelievable amount of technology that is being created from AI. You have all sorts of biological and chemical things that have never been possible before.
But now with AI, we can create a lot of these new products, free energy, just different types of things that we never even thought possible.
And actually, we don't even know what the future holds.
There's a lot of amazing things that are going to come out of this future.
And so what they want is they want to be in control of it and they want to help steer it towards their interest.
And so you have to really look at their core, you know, what drives them.
And if what is driving them is actually like a population reduction agenda, It's on us, the people, to push back.
And so there's certain techniques you can use to identify this trait in people's thinking.
You can actually ask them, are you a fan of more people on Earth or less people on Earth?
Are you pro-human or are you an extinctionist?
If AI was going to destroy humanity, would you keep it going or would you try to make it safe?
Pause it. You know, those types of things.
And so these guys, they're programmed to, you know, in a certain direction.
And so it just so happens that they're very well spoken.
They're very good at, you know, leading us down this road.
And it almost gets into like biblical territory where you have, you know, it's like...
Victims, you know, and then you have people that are, you know, the abusers.
And so I look at, you know, our current situation as abusive.
And ultimately, it's on the abuser or the abusee, the person, the victim, To push back against the abuser.
And as long as you continue taking it, it's almost like you can compare it to, you know, personal relationships.
I think a lot of people, you know, known, you know, people have been in abusive relationships and you're just like, hey, why don't you just push back?
Why don't you just leave? Why don't you just, you know, do something?
And so it's kind of a natural thing that happens where unless you stand up and, you know, Like, literally, you know, say, no, stop.
Enough. Like, we're not doing this.
The abuser will just continue.
And so I think that's actually what they're waiting for.
And you can actually study, you know, Satanism.
And that's one of the core principles of it.
It's almost like this just nature.
You know, it's like, look at the African plains.
You have these, you know, lions that, you know, will continually kill like buffalo or whatever.
And it's just a natural...
And so I think that these, um, you know, leaders that we have, you know, around the world, um, you know, believe that it's, it's their duty to, to, to lead and, and to, you know, do this abusive kind of, uh, techniques to us.
And as long as we're passively going along with it, you know, not looking up from our phones for two seconds to realize we're about to go off a cliff, then they're like, well, you know, you guys weren't smart enough to, uh, To look away from your phones for a second, you know?
And so if you end up going off the cliff, then that's your problem.
And, you know, too bad, so sad.
And we get to inherit the earth with our 500 million and, you know, the rest of you guys, you know, we're too dumb.
And so I think that's actually their mentality.
Tell us about the AI Trade Council.
How does that organization go against these extremely well-financed individuals?
We're talking about multi-billion dollar deep pockets.
Yeah, yeah. So it starts, it's really grassroots, you know, and that's where the, you know, we have a lot of power today.
In the United States, we, you know, we have free speech still for now.
You know, that could change soon.
You know, you see that transfer, they're actually arresting people in England for, you know, saying certain things, you know, school teachers and stuff for teaching the wrong topics.
But that agenda can come here very quickly.
And so, you know, we have a short period of time.
And so, the thing is, we've been, you know, allowed these capabilities.
You know, the grassroots is very, very powerful.
And so really, the AI Trust Council, it's made up of high-trust individuals.
Initially, the current window is open for people who are firefighters, EMTs, commercial pilots, military veterans, humanitarians, air traffic controllers.
And really, the humanitarians is the catch-all.
So if you can get five people to endorse you for being a humanitarian, somebody who's done something good for other humans, it means you're a humanitarian.
And it means that you have a certain mindset of helping humans.
And it actually separates people because there's a lot of people that aren't pro-human and they're not helpful towards other humans.
And they're actually resentful and they do things to hurt humans.
And so what we're trying to do is build a network of people who are pro-human, who care about the future of humanity, who care about technology, Who want good things.
And so from that, once you're on board as a member, you can appoint five other people as your trust counsel.
But what that does, it creates a LinkedIn-style platform that is made up of people of high trust initially, and it's their friends and family that they trust.
So Once you get through that first layer of professional qualification, the next layer is their friends and family of anybody that they find trustworthy.
And so the whole concept is it develops a network of high trust, like LinkedIn, where you can get endorsed for different things, for being honest, for having good intent, and that kind of thing.
But it's a social networking site that allows for The creation of a lot of new products.
And so we're looking at private lending as an option.
We're looking at private insurance groups as an option.
And really the ability to pull each other and say, hey, do you like this type of AI? Or do you think this is a problem?
Do you think this is a mental health issue?
Or do you think this is safe for kids?
You know, so that's really the The intent of the AI Trust Council is to balance the opinion on AI safety and say, hey, we think this is good, we think this is bad, and have some sort of responsible network where they're actually looking out for humans.
And it's not a control organization.
It has no influence other than just opinion.
But we can point out, We're evildoers.
We can point out people who are doing bad stuff and say, hey, look, even though this might have a shiny package on it that looks nice, it's actually all funded by big tech.
And so we don't want to get hoodwinked when it comes to AI safety.
We want authentic, real safety organizations.
And there's a lot of those that are popping up, but we want to be able to weigh in and evaluate those so that good people can say, hey, I like this safety organization.
I don't like that. I like these recommendations.
And really, if we're going to control artificial intelligence, it has to be done at the local level.
People need to be able to weigh in locally on how far AI goes.
You're going to have 1 billion IQ systems that are capable of just taking over all jobs, whether it's through robotics or through a digital agent on a screen.
So that means if you work from home, it means that you can be completely replaced if you work from a keyboard and a screen.
The AI is getting that good where it can actually Mimic exactly what you're doing.
So every Zoom call you're doing today, that data is getting...
Collated and put into a data set and it's actually creating an intelligence that can mimic, you know, executive level behavior.
And so that's what you're getting is you're getting basically a PhD in all things applied to a digital agent so that no matter what the job is, you're going to have a single digital agent that could, you know, be a marketer, could be a, you know, executive, could be a finance person, could be a, you know, you name it.
But it could do pretty much anything.
Google's creating some of these things.
A bunch of companies are competing to create this new digital agent.
Once those hit the market, though, it's game over for work.
I wrote an article recently about the end of labor.
That's really what's happening.
This is probably our last Labor Day, where things are under the current paradigm, the historical paradigm.
The future paradigm is weird.
It actually gets into a position where labor is just different.
If you're an hourly worker, Or, you know, doing something that's kind of repetitive, those jobs are going to be gone soon, like very soon.
And then if you're white-collar, you know, more, you know, different type of work, it's, you know, those jobs are getting taken to.
So you have to the point where you're going to have CEO-level intelligence capabilities in these AI systems and And ultimately, you can replace all humans.
Obviously, there's going to be some good ideas and things like that that humans are capable of coming up with that AI can't.
But when you have an AI that can problem solve, that can reason, that can think creatively, that can be a researcher, a scientist, that can literally do anything and actually forecast into the future good You know, good solutions to problems that, you know, beat out the best minds in the world.
It's like, well, why would we listen to a human at that point?
And so that's really, that's what's on the table here, is that you actually have this ability to create a brilliant You know, and then starts to get into biblical territory.
But, you know, that's one of the things that the tech leadership want is they want an AI god and they actually believe in a spirituality of this because it's a, you know, when you have this 1 billion IQ system, You know, that's able to lead people.
You start to get into a whole different realm.
And the problem is our, you know, human IQ is very low in comparison to these systems.
I mean, obviously we have a spirit and we have, you know, the capability of thinking.
You know, outside the box and things like that.
But these high IQ AI systems, they've beaten humans in every single game imaginable.
Some of the most complicated things you can imagine.
They've creatively come up with new patterns and solutions to problems that they were never trained on.
So it means that we're going to get outgunned and outmatched really, really quickly.
And so it's up to us to shape the future that we want.
And if we sit here passively, we don't do anything, we're going to be delivered on a platter of the Bill Gates solution.
And so that's what's coming.
Wow, wow.
You know, it's like I'm thinking like there's many ways like humankind could evolve.
It's not like AI is...
The only way we could have evolved.
I mean, one of the other things is, you know, our intelligence seems to have been suppressed, you know, through fluoride and chemicals and all of that.
So we don't even know our full potential without all this, you know, without all this chemical nonsense and things that suppress our abilities.
So it's just the whole thing seems very odd and convenient for people in power that this is the technology that's been developed versus the other, you know, Plentiful myriad of realities.
You know what I mean? Like, for example, technologies to help eradicate all disease or clean the planet Earth.
I mean, why is this being pushed?
It seems like there's a deeper agenda behind this really to erase most of humankind.
Yeah, I think that you have to dig into the satanic agenda and really start to study their line of thinking in terms of satanism and that kind of thing to really understand the globalist viewpoint.
And so we've allowed ourselves to It's a satanic system that we live in right now.
It's in the biblical territory where they talk about the devil is the king of this world.
And ultimately, we're in a battle right now.
We're in a spiritual battle, you know, for the souls and the lives of the humans that are here.
And so do we allow the people to get dominated and destroyed, you know, from the inside out, you know, biologically, mentally, on a soul level, you know, we're getting transformed?
Do we allow that?
Or do we push back and say, no, no, no, like, you know, we've had enough, you know, nice try.
And really, it gets in the banking process.
This whole thing gets into, you know, it's called tacit compliance.
And tacit compliance is a concept in Satanism where if, you know, it gets back to that victim-abuser concept.
But if you go along with, you know, the abuse and you pay with, you know, U.S. dollars and you, you know, you allow, you ride along on their system It means that you're complying and you're going along with it and you're not pushing back, you're not creating your own solutions to these things.
And so that's why crypto is transformational.
So if you have cryptocurrency, it's backed by gold and silver, it is a solution to counteract this globalist agenda.
It's a very easy solution that we can transform from, you know, this one system into a new system.
You know, we're all very familiar with it.
I've got a Coinbase credit card, you know, that I use.
And so life as you know it can be very, very simple.
Literally, it's just taking one bank account and transferring it over to another bank account.
That's it. And having crypto be the currency.
You can back that up by gold and silver.
You're saying that getting rid of US dollar and these currencies that support this kind of anti-human agenda, that would be an action that regular people could take?
100%. Yeah, 100%.
And that's actually, it kicks them in the balls.
It takes them down.
Basically, that's how they've got the power.
That's their control.
It's the currency.
And so if they've got control over the currency, and we continually go along with it, that is their method of control over humanity.
And so we can counteract that by going crypto.
And you don't want, you know, obviously they're going to try to control crypto too, but what you want is you want something that is backed by gold and silver.
That is, you know, so if things go sideways and, you know, the world goes to hell, then, you know, there's massive power outages, whatever.
You could still trade in physical gold and silver as coin.
And we could still have actual U.S. dollar From the Treasury rather than the Federal Reserve.
If we do that, then, you know, regardless of a cyber attack, you know, cyber pandemic or, you know, some sort of power outage, you'd still be able to transact and, you know, keep track of things.
But you want that currency backed by gold.
So that is the solution.
That is the way that we get out of this problem is by going directly.
It's our money. It's just a form of exchange between people.
And we have that right to choose how we spend.
And these guys want to control that.
Yeah. Is there anything we didn't talk about in terms of the work you're doing in AITC that you'd want to mention before we wrap up this episode?
Yeah, yeah. The Artificial Intelligence Trust Council is just getting started.
We have a landing page website right now, but if you have any viewers that would want to hop on there and sign up, it's a placeholder.
And so right now, our current website is getting built.
We have funding coming in, but it's been slow, obviously, because we're going against the system.
This is grassroots, so it's been difficult.
But good things are happening and more people are getting aware.
But you can go to theAITC.com.
You can sign up there and it gets your name on the list.
And once the real website's up, Then it's going to open up a whole world of capabilities.
So some of the cool aspects of the website when it comes out is that we have some unique ways of viewing data.
We also have a capture for metadata so that as you operate on the site, you actually have a wallet where your activity goes into a wallet.
So instead of big tech, the typical paradigm right now, Is that all your metadata, all your activities on a website, it all goes to Mark Zuckerberg or whoever.
And they resell it to advertisers or whoever else.
And so it develops a profile on you as a person where they understand the noises you make when you sleep, how many times you blink, how your eyes move on a screen.
Literally, they know every detail about you as a person to include.
What's coming is now mind reading.
That's coming out. The ability to determine emotion from your devices.
So all these capabilities are there and they're like a vacuum cleaner sucking up all of your available data and they're using that data to help model and control you as a person and then digitally recreate you.
And so that gets in the whole transhumanism thing and their vision of the future.
But So we're saying no, that's stupid.
That's not a good system.
What we're going to do instead is have a wallet where you individually control it.
It's your personal property.
You should have control over that.
And so as this AI future unfolds, by having that digital wallet that captures your metadata that you control, then you can broker that yourself.
And then you can actually earn an income on that metadata.
And so you can have passive income.
And so what we're trying to do is create a system where people can vote and poll.
And so by being honest, posting things that are real, posting things that are not AI-generated, and having a truthful perspective on things, we're trying to encourage that.
And so we're trying to help people build high-quality metadata that they can then sell themselves.
And so that's a unique feature.
But we have some real cool ways to view data.
You know, it's like why, if you were to work at Meta, or you work at some of these, you know, Microsoft or whatever, I guarantee they have a backdoor view into you and your profile online.
And so they can see all these, you know, real wild details about, you know, every aspect of you as a person.
It's like, well, but you can't see that as the user.
It's hidden from you. It's like, you know, it's behind the curtain.
So what we're trying to do is flip that So that you can actually start to review your own information and take control of your data.
And really, the future is data.
And so whoever controls the data controls the future.
What we're trying to do is give that data to the people and let the people be in control of it.
So stand by.
There's good stuff coming.
But please sign up.
And you're on the forefront of a really amazing future.
But it just, it takes all of us to come together to make it happen.
Wow.
Well, thank you so much, Chris, for coming on to the Blood Money Podcast.
Definitely follow Chris on theaitc.com.
For the viewers out there, make sure you check out americahappens.com.
Make sure you check out our Roku channel, our Apple TV channel, or our Amazon Fire channel, which we are on Smart TV now.
Thank you so much for showing up to this episode of Blood Money.
I will see you all on the next episode.
▲
Export Selection