All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2023 - Blood Money
50:45
Blood Money Episode 47 w/ Jennifer Goodwin
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
so
blood money episode 47 with jennifer goodwin Law vs. Legal.
How you have consented to slavery and how to get out.
Alright, we're on the next episode of Blood Money.
Today I have Jennifer Goodwin.
How are you doing, Jennifer? I'm doing amazing.
How are you doing? Good, good.
Thank you so much. I'm going to give a quick little background on you.
So essentially, you were in marketing for 25 years, but around 2020, when this whole COVID, you know, quote unquote, pandemic happened, it seemed like you had a very eye-opening experience.
Can you tell us what happened once all those shenanigans started?
Sure. So my background being that I was raised in Massachusetts and everything was patriotic, you know, my whole, everything in my blood was about patriotism and Paul Revere and the British are coming and live free or die, right?
And so I just grew up with that and my whole lifestyle changed.
Had pieces of that, and so when 2020 happened, I thought, and I had read everything on the internet for the past however many years the internet's been online, and so when 2020 happened, when they released what they released on the television, I got really pissed off once I realized what was going on,
because I realized this was a control grab and all different things, and so I literally bugged out for a couple months to the mountains of Virginia and thought about things.
I was screaming on social media.
I was saying things like, if you shut your business down, you don't deserve the American dream.
I was pissed off.
I finally just decided I'm going to go home.
I'm going to Sell my house.
Everything in it. I'm going to hit the road with my dog in an RV, which is something I'd never done.
I didn't even figure out how to back up my RV until I hit Texas.
And, you know, this was August of 2020.
And I just started...
Figuring out who's in this truth movement, who knows the Constitution, who's who, and where can I get more information?
Because I was putting up websites as quickly as I could with my marketing agency.
I got rid of all the clients, and I said, no, no, no, this is way more important.
And along the way, I bumped into a couple key people.
At first, I bumped into...
All the things you hear out there, you know, you should do this, you should do that paperwork, you should get this title.
And I said something that just sounds like more man-made garbage or trickery.
I need to keep going.
And within about two months, I heard somebody speaking of the difference between law and legal.
And as soon as I heard that, I knew that was the final puzzle piece.
That was it for me. And I went all in on that and I'm still all in on that.
So you're saying that when you realize all these shenanigans in 2020, that started opening up a world for you in terms of law versus legal, right?
Which, for the viewer that doesn't understand that, there's law, which is the law that comes down from the creator, that our Constitution was inspired by, that the Magna Carta was inspired by, and then there's legal, which is essentially all the creations of the legal societies.
Is that correct? Yep, that's my delineation.
If it's made by the creator, it's law.
If it's made by man, it's legal.
Like, legal is basically for victimless crimes.
You get punished. A lot of people have their lives, you know, thrown in these ruinous situations when they go through what is, quote-unquote, a legal process that is adjudicated upon by the bar, the legal societies, etc.
Right, right. I mean, legal was created to undo law.
Okay. This is really interesting, by the way, because, by the way, I took a class with Jennifer where I learned about some of this stuff.
And it's very interesting that I guess what you're talking about was the whole state national theories and all those guys that run around saying, oh, you got to get, you know, this authenticated, that authenticated, this notarized, that notarized.
And after you do all these papers, you might actually get your rights back.
Yeah. And you're opposed to that.
You're opposed to that whole approach.
It's not that I'm opposed 100%.
It's the order of things, okay?
So let's dissect that a little bit.
I don't need a piece of paper to give me my rights.
What do we do with paper in the morning?
We wipe our butts with it, literally.
We start fires with it.
I don't need a piece of paper like, oh wait, maybe this will give me my rights back.
Well, maybe that will give me my rights back.
We have rights whether you know how to enforce them or not.
Nobody can take your rights away because the rights come from the Creator.
Some people call them unalienable or unalienable.
We don't need adjectives.
They're just rights.
I don't need a paper or a title or some other man on this planet to give me my rights back.
That's not the way that it works.
But a lot of people have been conditioned by the system to fear authority and fear government and what they're confusing is that with law you have rights and freedoms because they come from the Creator.
With legal you only have benefits and privileges which yes are given out and can be taken away.
Okay, got you.
Got you. So, alright, so how do you go from this?
And it's unfortunate, by the way, because most people even, they only run into this stuff when they're in big trouble.
They understand the scam that's out there.
They're having false accusations and all kinds of ruinous stuff.
Then they start digging around and going, why is this legal system so corrupt?
Why is it so wrong?
Why am I not getting any remedy here?
Yeah. And it's unfortunate that, you know, pretty much when people's life starts falling apart, that's when they learn this stuff, right?
So tell me a little bit about, give me examples of what is law versus legal.
Tangible examples that any layman could understand.
Sure. So, for example, When the Creator created law for mankind, and whatever you believe in, it doesn't matter to me.
We all have our own beliefs.
I believe that something created mankind and all the beautiful things that are here on Earth.
And I believe that if you polled 8 billion people today, that we would all agree that murder is bad.
And so inherently, we know law.
So for people that don't necessarily understand the difference between law and legal, could you give us some tangible examples?
Sure, sure.
So, law, a lot of us heard in childhood, especially if we were raised in church at all, is do no harm, don't steal my property, don't lie, kill, steal, cheat, any of that stuff.
Basically, the Ten Commandments was law for mankind.
Now, a tangible example that people can wrap their heads around.
If you and I are hungry and we're camping out on a lake, the creator says that we can go fish in the lake and eat the food that is in the forest and in the water, right?
That's law that we can feed ourselves.
We were given dominion over everything that's here.
Well, legal, some man came along at some point and said, well, we should create a policy for that.
So we're going to either require that you get a fishing permit or license, or we might even take it so far to say, well, no, that lake is in an HOA neighborhood, and so you can't fish there at all, right?
And so, or the government unlawfully buys up a whole national forest, and now the people can't go in there and So legal is the undoing of law.
Usually when you are getting a license, it's because the legal system tells you you have to get a license, which you don't.
And this applies to any kind of license, whether it's a medical license, a teacher's license, a hairdresser's license, a soldier's license.
A license is usually permission to do something that breaks the law.
It seems as though, like, in terms of the example you just gave with the, you know, going fishing, the law in terms of God's law dictates that we could actually fish in that water.
But then man comes along and they put restrictions.
And they tend to do that with pretty much, I mean, all sectors of our life.
Everything. Yes, everything.
And so I think what's happened, I think what happened to you in 2020, and I think what I'm seeing happen across the board, so for example, that state national process, apparently it's up to 21 million now.
And I understand that that's not necessarily the process, but the fact that there's 21 million people that have decided to leave the system seems as though they no longer trust the system, that it's a predatory system maybe.
Definitely is.
And to get back to your earlier question about state nationalism, it's not that I'm against it, because I always say, as long as people are waking up, as long as they are learning and educating instead of entertaining themselves with the television, as long as they are trying something and kind of spreading their wings a little bit in what's true, I'm okay with that.
The problem is people think a title gives them their rights back, and that could not be further from the truth.
Everybody needs to learn law first, as a man or a woman, so that if they're all alone, they can express their law and protect their rights and their property.
Taking a title is a diminishment, so I am a woman.
If I choose to take a title such as business owner, employee, teacher, doctor, plaintiff, tenant, any title there is, it's a diminishment, and now that title just...
I just told the legal system, yeah, I want to play in your game.
I'm going to pick up your token in your game, and now you have the right, you have my consent To apply the rules and the duties and the obligations of that game to me because I just said, well, yeah, I want to play the game.
But if you don't want to pick up a title, you stand in your highest power as a man or a woman.
So a title can benefit you or I or your audience, but you have to know the difference between operating at your highest power of law and stepping down into a title when it benefits you, why it benefits you.
And so I believe that If people want to be a state national, they should learn law first, or at least at the same time so that they understand, well, when you go to court and you say, well, I have a piece of paper that says I'm a state national, that doesn't do anything for you.
It's when you can say, I have a claim here, and if there's not another man or woman here with a verifiable or lawful claim that I did something, then I'm going to press my claim on that man or woman, regardless of whether they have a title like police officer, governor, teacher, whatever, president.
So people have to understand that you're the living man or woman.
A title is a diminishment of that and you have to know how to use it because it's a game piece in a game.
Wow, wow. So, essentially, whenever your CEO or your parent, or these are all titles, right?
All titles. What are the correct terms?
Man, woman, father...
Man, woman, father, mother, offspring, sons, daughters.
Basically, the biblical terms.
There's a lot of words that are in the Bible, and I became more...
In tune with the Bible because I was learning law at such a rapid speed.
I mean, I knew it from childhood inherently, but I had to, you know, really dive into the nuances of it.
It's far more simple than legal.
I can write my law notice with crayon on eight and a half by eleven and enforce it in court of Jennifer.
It's far more simple because the Creator needed for anyone in any country with any language, with any educational level to be able to express their rights.
Hey, don't touch that. That's mine.
Hey, don't tell me what to do.
I'm a free man. So the biblical terms will, if people start studying the difference between law and legal, they'll start remembering, oh, trespass, wrongs, forgive, remedy, mother, father.
It comes back to you.
So basically when you're using their law society created terms, are you giving jurisdiction to them by then basically calling yourself something other than man-woman?
Yes, yes. So you're saying, oh, you're playing Monopoly over there, and I'm playing chess as a man or a woman.
But if I start using Monopoly money and talking about red hoses...
Red houses and green houses.
I'm trying to remember the pieces and the Pasco and Park Ave.
If I start speaking with that vocabulary and those terms, of course, they're saying, well, you're in our game.
You're not talking about knights and pawns.
You're not in your game.
The vocabulary can put you right in their jurisdiction.
And so they changed the vocabulary over the past few hundred years to trick us completely.
Wow, wow. So I'm going to pull this diagram up.
This is in regards to the hierarchy of God, the law, and where the legal societies come in there, and then where U.S. citizens are part of this whole chart.
Sure. Here, I'll pull this first one up.
So you have a creator and a man and a woman.
You have a creator. And the creator created man and woman.
That's the creator's creation.
And only the creator has...
Authority over its creation.
So man and woman is number two on the totem pole, as I always say.
And then man and woman, as we got more intelligent or more advanced, we created things such as government, and government created things that are, you know, societies and courts and all these things.
And so man and woman has authority over its creation.
So man and woman is the highest on the totem pole if we want to hold our own court, if we want to enforce our rights.
We have authority over government, but they tried to flip the script and tell us that they have authority over us.
Government has authority over the legal societies, and the legal societies have authority over the courts, the judges, the lawyers, getting into some of those titles, and some of the titles that are beneath that, citizen, national, employee, parent, farmer, teacher, tenant.
Defendant, plaintiff, witness, everything that isn't a man or a woman is a title.
And that's part of why you see such a strong, forceful agenda to attack the title of man and woman these days.
And you can call yourself 77 other things.
That's exactly why they're doing it.
They're trying to steer you away from calling yourself man and woman because it actually is the highest authority above all of this stuff.
So, you can see it's okay if you want to take a title.
You just have to know that you're stepping way down the totem pole and you're stepping into a different game.
So most of the time when people go to court because whatever accusation, traffic ticket, whatever it is, right?
They're going in there having representation with a lawyer, right?
So are you saying that rather than going through that kind of system that's really been created by the legal societies that you go in there and you say, hey, you know, I am, you know, in my case, I'm a man, you know, I am Van Miller, a man, a living man, you know, you represent yourself in that way and that gives you more legal rights, freedoms.
I mean, how does it work in practice?
So, a couple things there.
You don't want to go to their court You don't need to go to their court.
You can hold your own court as a man or a woman if you learn the difference between law and legal and you learn the vocabulary and you learn how to write your simple notices on one piece of paper.
And 95% of the time the notice shuts down any controversy that would lead to court.
So a lot of people use the reference point of how many court cases do you win?
It's about not going to court.
It's about solving the problem beforehand.
So you're sending, just to get clarification here, so you get somebody says, you know, hey, you got to come to court.
I don't know. You tore down my fence.
You owe me $3,000, right?
At that point, you don't go to court.
You write a notice to this individual?
Sure. So in the neighbor example, let's say my neighbor...
on my door or in your example, you know, maybe he sends something in the mail that I have to go to court or he called some third party, the authorities, the police or something because my dog had run over and broke through his fence or something or someone visiting me had driven their car through the fence or for whatever reason he did not decide to come knock on my door the way law says, man to woman, man to man, right?
Go to your neighbor, go to your brother immediately.
Again, that's biblical.
And he involved a third party and I got some paperwork.
Immediately I would go to him.
The minute that I find out that there's some type of accident that could lead to a wrong, that could eventually lead to a trespass, By law, in law, I'm obligated to return to honor.
So I'm obligated to go knock on his door and say, oh my gosh, I had no idea.
Let me take care of this immediately.
That's the right thing to do.
Let me pay for the damage.
Let me, you know, if I have to do the work and go put in a new fence for you, let me fix the problem and restore your property.
Now, most people want to involve The authorities and third party and legal systems because that's how we've been programmed to do that.
So in the case of something simple like this or neighborly within your community, you go work it out man to man, woman to man, right?
Woman to woman. In the case of, let's say, a lot of people get a third party debt collection notice, okay?
Total legal system, all contract.
Now, there's two things here.
On one hand, you signed up for that.
You agreed to do that.
So the honorable thing to do is to pay the bill or do whatever you agreed to.
On the other hand, there's people that know the loan was fraudulent in the first place and they want to fight it.
So if you were, I'm not suggesting this, but if you were going to use law instead of legal in that case, you could put your own claim together and hold your own court And to whoever the man or the woman is that's sending you the notice, I don't care if you're a man who sometimes acts as a lawyer.
I don't care if you're a man who sometimes acts as a representative of that bank.
I'm going to hold you accountable man to man if you don't have a lawful claim to prove in my court.
Well, then I'm going to compress my order.
The way that...
We like to say it is, if it's something that you agreed to in legal or if it's something that could benefit you as a title because you are re-presented as a title in the legal system, then use the legal system if you know what you're doing.
But if it's a level 10 issue your kids are getting taken your house is getting taken your money's being extorted if it in any way Really really harms you and we're talking some serious stuff You better know law and you better hold your own court so that you can stop all that They don't tell you things like hold your own courts See, everybody's been conditioned to think that in order to do any of this stuff, you need permission, right?
You need their benefits, as opposed to exercising your rights.
Nobody teaches you that you could hold your own court.
Like, tell me, how does that work, holding your own court?
Sure. So the process, it's simple, but you have to learn it.
It took me about 60 days, to be quite honest.
So I consider that very quick.
And I had a success right out of the gate.
So, like I said, let's come up with a good example.
Let's say my neighbor did something to damage my property or harm my dog.
Let's say my neighbor's dog...
Got into my yard and bit my dog.
Okay? Now, that is harm because it's to a living thing.
Damage is to an inanimate object like a fence or a title, a client.
But harm is to a living thing.
So I... Write a notice or, sorry, write a correspondence or knock on the door or text my neighbor and say, you know, her name's actually Jennifer too.
Hey Jennifer, you know, one of your dogs got bit my dog, so we need to take care of this.
Sure, sure, no problem.
You know, let me know what the vet bill is, okay?
Now let's say she ignores me and I've sent the, I dropped the vet bill in her box and she ignores me.
Well, I've already gone to her in the private, one-on-one, to give her the opportunity to return to honor and provide remedy to myself and my dog.
She doesn't do that. Okay, notice number one.
I'm gonna take out a piece of paper, maybe hand write it, maybe put it in the computer.
You know, I, a woman, Jennifer, claim that you, a woman who is known as my neighbor, did allow your property, in this instance your dog, to come over and harm my property, in this instance my dog.
You see I'm using man, woman, I, property, right?
Yeah. I claim that this is in regards to a $1,000 vet bill, and I require you to pay this within seven days, and if you don't, I state that all hearing is true, and I'll invite you to open court.
So that's a very different language than...
Hey, you gotta pay this bill, right?
It's different because that's how law used to be held, but it's been brainwashed out of us.
Okay, she ignores me. I send notice too.
Hey, I sent you a notice seven days ago.
You didn't pay. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Is it your intent? To do a wrong here.
Okay, now we're escalating from maybe an accident to a wrong because you're ignoring me.
A wrong is a bad word.
It's biblical. And then the third notice, if it gets that far, you know, you've ignored the first two notices.
And I'm just paraphrasing here in common parlance.
We've ignored the first two notices.
I ask, is it your intent to let this escalate to what could be a trespass by way of debt?
Because she's not paying me.
I've gone ahead and invited you to court, right?
Court of Jennifer. Then, if she still hasn't answered me, I'm preparing my claim for court of Jennifer down at the courthouse.
Court of Jennifer. I've got a cover letter for it.
And just to be clear, court of Jennifer is being held at the actual courthouse.
Is the courthouse where you normally go?
The buildings are for the public.
Yes. You're making it your court as opposed to going there asking permission, asking them to play referee, basically.
Asking them to appoint me some lawyer and re-present me.
I want to present myself as a woman in my court.
I don't need to be re-presented as a title such as client, defendant, What I want to point out for the viewers, what Jennifer is trying to break down there is that's a diminishment of the power.
The minute you put re in front of present, it's a diminishment of your power, diminishment of your rights.
And hence, it's always best to present, not re-present.
Right, because you're being represented as a dead entity that doesn't have rights.
A title is a costume.
It's a fiction in a game.
And sorry to interrupt you.
One thing I want to also point out for the viewer there is your name is a title, right?
So when you are actually born, your name in upper caps that appears on your birth certificate, on your passport, that is basically a fictitious entity, a dead entity created to replace...
Your true self. Hence, that's how you're essentially giving them jurisdiction.
If you walk in there and the judge says, sir, are you like, you know, Vem Miller?
And you just nod your head to the uppercase Vem Miller, then you're basically agreeing, yes, I'm this dead entity out in the middle of the ocean.
You could pretty much do with me as you like.
I'm giving your life, you know, my life into your hands versus walking in there saying I'm a living man.
And, you know, essentially what you're stating is you get all your notices in place, you've done your homework, you've given opportunity for a remedy.
We've given three chances for her to do the right thing, right?
We're taught to give them an opportunity in the Bible.
We're taught to...
Let them restore their honor so that their soul doesn't have that tarnish anymore.
When you forgive those who have trespassed against you, you are fixing their karma.
It's very powerful.
Law isn't just about court and tickets and money.
It's about restoring honor to the world, which is the biggest benefit to learning law is it fixes so many problems because it fixes your communities, your families.
It gives your children strength that...
Knowing that no one can tell them what to do in a harmful way, you know, God forbid someone's creeping on your sons or daughters and they know their law and they know how to express it.
It's useful in so many places.
But yes, I can go hold court of Jennifer Goodwin down at the county courthouse because those buildings are for the public.
And I tried to handle it in the private and I might even put on my cover letter, you know, there comes a time when When a woman like me, who's operating honorably in the private, and I need to come out into the public and hold my court at the courthouse, and I need to have a magistrate, not a judge.
I don't need any lawyers.
I don't need any judging happening.
I have my facts.
I have my evidence. I have my proof that I gave her three chances.
And I just need, you know, my magistrate to enforce my claim.
I don't need any...
I don't need any arguments.
I don't need the man acting as judge to act as a judge.
I just need you to act as a magistrate and be my public servant so we can wrap this meeting up and I can go about my day.
Yeah, and so the legal society's game is really making things drag out, creating billable hours.
They don't like simple solutions like this, and I want to dissect for the viewer the simple solution that Jennifer just described, right?
Which is that you're sending notices, you know, you're sending these notices and you do it three or four times, and you let the person know that they've done it wrong towards you, right?
So, The person ignores it, the person ignores it, the person ignores it.
By the time you walk into the court, normally when you're walking to the court, you're looking for the judge to resolve your dispute, right?
This is different. This is you're coming at it with a claim, basically.
It's a claim, not a complaint.
I've already done all the homework, judge, you know, opportunities.
Here's the paperwork. Neighbor ignored it.
She owes me X amount of dollars.
So it's basically you're presenting a completed case almost.
It's a completed case.
There's no discussion.
I mean, unless I was asking for a million dollars For a thousand dollar vet bill, you know, that's the only reason that a magistrate could speak up and say, well, I don't think, you know, that your claim is reasonable.
If it's unreasonable, obviously unreasonable.
But I can prove my time that it took to go to the vet.
I can prove the, you know...
The aggravation, the time that she didn't pay.
I could have put into notice number two that for every day or minute or hour that this goes unpaid, I'm going to add another dollar or ten dollars or whatever.
It has to make sense for the circumstance.
I too have to stand in honor.
That's the great thing about law.
It requires everybody to stand in honor, return to honor.
Provide remedy, accept remedy, forgive.
So, yeah, there's no discussion.
See, judges in the legal system judge.
They give their opinions, they hear both sides, and they usually are going to side with the members of the bar association, the lawyers, the prosecutors, because they're all in the same club and we're not in it.
Yeah. As a title, we are way beneath what they are in the legal system.
Totally. Now, the question I wanted to bring up here is that first example that you brought up, I just want to, well, let me just emphasize to the viewer, when you knock on your neighbor's door, you're not necessarily saying, hey, I want to provide remedy.
You're not being a pushover, right?
So let's say in that first example where I think we're talking about the fence being knocked down or something and your neighbor filing a lawsuit, you knocking on the neighbor's door and saying, hey, I want to provide remedy.
Right. But part of that notice is, you know, I want to provide remedy.
I'm fully willing to pay the three thousand dollars or whatever it costs for your fence.
But I would, you know, kindly ask you to show me evidence that it was my car That did this, correct?
So you're asking, you're basically trying to resolve it and see what his evidence is.
Does he really have an honest dispute?
And if he doesn't have an honest dispute, then you could turn around and say, well, you have no evidence and that becomes your next notice, correct?
You could. You could do that in certain situations, like the third party dead and other things.
I mean, when it comes to neighbors, I look at it as, listen, I don't have to be right all the time because I like my peace at home.
$3,000, yes.
I'd want to see evidence that that was it.
Let's say it was $100.
Just something that somebody could afford.
If my dog had a habit of getting out in the neighborhood and causing trouble, and for that one time there was no evidence, I might just say, you know what?
Let's just take care of this.
Here's $100. Let's call it a day.
Let's go back to talking about having a barbecue.
Right? People have been programmed and conditioned to fight, fight, fight, fight, fight and beat each other's throats.
That's not getting us anywhere.
Yeah, yeah. And so when you walk into one of these courts and rather than having your claim, you're now going to a judge saying, hey, you know, play referee.
And on top of that, you're asking him to play referee for a US citizen.
Let's talk about what is the implications of going in there as a US citizen and asking a judge to basically decide upon something that is a crucial case in your life.
Well, again, a U.S. citizen is a title.
And they tricked us into thinking it was the best thing, right?
Everybody's got their little flags when they come to this country.
And, oh, I just got my citizenship.
And even Trump did that on TV when he was president, where he had a bunch of people where they did an immigration ceremony.
And I thought, hmm, this is interesting.
It's not the best title in the world.
It's one of the lowest titles on the totem pole.
That's why I said... Earlier is that I'm not completely against the state national title because at least it's a higher title than US citizen, but you really want to step out of the whole thing and know that you're a man or a woman at the top.
But as far as, you know, when you go to court as a title, Whatever the rules are that apply to that title that is in the legal system, the codes, the acts, the statutes, the policies, the USC, the UCC, it's all codified as to what applies to that title.
So that title doesn't have any rights, doesn't have any freedoms.
That title only has benefits and privileges, and those benefits and privileges can be taken away just as they are given.
So it really depends on the situation.
There's so many different situations and moving parts and scenarios, but yeah, people really need to learn this, learn the difference so they can pick and choose when to play chess and when to play Monopoly.
Totally, totally. So I want to give a little background to this and tell me if I'm on the mark here, right?
The founders of this country, obviously, you know, we had our constitution, and then there was this original 13th Amendment.
I don't know, have you heard of the original 13th Amendment by any chance?
I'm not that well versed in it.
So basically, the original 13th Amendment that I think burned down in the White House in 1812 had to do with titles of nobility.
And part of that was basically removing esquires from legal office, which esquires are also attorneys and lawyers, right?
Now, this was very smart because what's really happened now, if you look at it, is obviously our judiciary is extremely corrupt.
I mean, I'm not going to mince wars.
I hear all kinds of stories of corruption, right?
And it always has to do with this self-policing.
When judges do something bad, they're never held accountable.
You have essentially these judicial societies policing themselves.
Nothing ever happens. Judge could get away with murder, right?
Then you have the legislature, which if we had this 13th Amendment, we wouldn't have had any lawyers in our legislature, right?
But now you have 60 to 75% lawyers, bar agents essentially, writing laws to make the legal profession more profitable for lawyers.
That's an insane conflict of interest.
Like if that was actually ratified, we wouldn't be in this mess.
Right. And herein lies the problem.
Let's assume the Founding Fathers were good guys.
Let's assume they were truly trying to escape tyranny, truly trying to set up a free country, and they started, you know, this country, America, set it up the way they want to set it up.
They wrote down a contract, as we know, called the Constitution, based on the Creator's Law.
And they said, that's it.
This is enough. You know, we're writing this contract to the corporation, to the Crown, saying, we're expressing our law on paper.
That's what they were doing.
They were expressing their law, their God-given rights on paper to say, this is what we're going to follow.
That paper doesn't give us rights.
That paper was just a written expression of what these people believed at that time.
Now, they probably held on to America for about eight years because, excuse me, in the late 1800s, a corporation came in named the United States.
and pretending to be part of America.
So now you have America the country, you have United States the corporation that sits in DC and only applies to that 10 square miles.
So a US citizen is actually a citizen of DC.
A US citizen on the books, it says you are an employee of the corporation that sits in the District of Columbia.
And that they don't have any other jurisdiction out here in the country.
but everybody just consents.
So, what the United States is doing as a corporation serves them.
It serves them.
That's why they don't get in trouble is because one department's not going to tattle on the other department because the CEO at the top isn't going to allow it.
What they're doing is perfectly fine in their system.
People haven't separated that either to realize that, well, wait a minute.
That's their system.
We shouldn't be voting in their system.
It's foreign to America.
We shouldn't be taking titles in their system.
We shouldn't be paying attention to their system.
We should be operating in our system, but we abandoned it back in the 1800s in Philadelphia and we never came back.
So they took over. Wow. That was 1871 that happened.
Wow. Wow. And then, you know, you have all the Federal Reserve and, you know, tyranny stacked on top of tyranny.
It's getting bigger.
And I hope people notice.
I mean, every institution is corrupted.
The educational...
It's literally a game of opposites.
The educational system is actually made to uneducate people, to really, you know, raise them to be like, you know, another brick in the wall, basically, drones, right?
The judicial system is a complete shit show.
I mean, absolute shit show.
I'd say one of the worst systems out there because you have these judges have immunity.
Judges should not have immunity if they're breaching the Constitution.
Well, the title has immunity.
But if you hold that man, Bob, accountable, no immunity.
No immunity, yeah. No immunity.
I can remove your title.
I can remove your authority at any time.
If you are harming me, trespassing on me, any of those things, I can remove that title and hold my own court and hold you accountable in my court.
Man's court is the highest court in the land above the Supreme Court.
Wow. And this is why this kind of knowledge scares the crap out of them, because really you're undoing an immense fraud and a fraud of biblical proportions.
I mean... It's pure evil.
It's insane. It's insane.
It's literally the destruction of the people equals their profit and benefit, which is like, I don't even know how our countries function this far, you know, 150 years of this nonsense, you know?
Right. Yeah.
Is there anything else?
I mean, I wanted this episode to be like a basics for people, an entry from getting their minds wrapped around law versus legal, understanding that this is all fraudulent.
Do you think we covered all the important aspects?
I know we have some more slides here that we didn't necessarily go through, but do you think this is a good introductory course for individuals that don't know about this?
Absolutely. Just to summarize, law came before man, and legal is everything that has been made by man.
When they say the lawmakers in Capitol Hill, there are no lawmakers.
No man on the planet has ever made law.
No man on the planet has ever made law.
No man on the planet can make law.
No man on the planet ever will make law.
They've simply tricked you into thinking that a Code, Act, Statute, Policy, Order, Mandate is law.
It is not law.
When the building inspector says you have to get a permit to add a bathroom on your property, that's not law.
That's a code.
That's a clone of law.
That's counterfeit law.
It's fake. It's a fraud.
You can hold that man accountable for extorting you.
Wow, wow, wow.
There's power in them words, I'll tell you that.
You've got to realize the power.
People need to realize the power that you have.
It's all about knowledge.
You know what it is, too?
People are too lazy.
I mean, we just had another episode where we talked about this.
I ran for office in 2022.
A lot of wonderful voters out there that are very well educated, but I'll tell you, a lot of people that are completely Completely ignorant.
They're too far into their Xbox and their Playstations and Netflix and whatever.
Just crap that wastes their time.
They spend 20 minutes a day learning about this stuff.
I mean, it's just the fraud's over at that point.
But it's our ignorance. That's the thing that was so amazing about the class that you gave, which it's like we're literally subjecting ourselves to this.
We're allowing them to do it.
We're giving them jurisdiction.
We're giving them power.
It's ignorant consent is what it is.
And again, I, you know, I had a good foundation of right from wrong.
I inherently knew law and I didn't know it all these years until I really heard it and heard it clearly and it just, it was like a lightning bolt went through my ear and everything.
Fiber in my body was like, that's it.
That's the missing link.
That's the final puzzle piece.
You must consume this.
And I did. And after about 60 days, a girlfriend of mine called and said, oh my God, some lawyer, we don't even know who it is, just locked up 65 grand in our construction account.
We owe payroll on Friday.
That's spent. And she said, what can we do?
And I said, well, we...
You can write a notice based on what I've been sharing with you, and then I will look at it, and if I need to, you know, suggest a few edits, I'll do that.
So we sat down on a Monday night at 8 o'clock at night on Google Drive and on Zoom and went through what she wrote, and it was I, a woman.
Well, she wrote it in her husband's name because it was her husband's account.
I, a man. We'll say John Doe claimed that you, a man, Richard Smith, who sometimes acts as a lawyer, did take my property, in this instance my bank account of $65,000, I require you to restore my property.
Property is the highest right of man, whether it's your body or money or house or anything.
And... You know, we went through the basic notice number one.
Like I said, notice number one, 95% of the time will shut down any controversy.
Well, this was Monday night, 10 o'clock.
She emailed it just from, you know, a PDF or whatever.
Maybe she copy-pasted the content.
I don't know. And she said, I'm going to go down in the morning and drop the copy in the certified mail off to the law firm, legal firm.
It's not a law firm. And, you know, by Tuesday afternoon she's calling me, we could kiss you through the phone, the money's being restored, all the non-sufficient fees they're covering, they're backing off, they're scared to death.
I thought, I said, wait a minute, little old me who graduated the police academy and has a two-year architectural degree and is in the marketing world, Just shut down a whole team of lawyers that have millions of dollars of education with one little notice written in all lowercase letters with only one period at the end?
Interesting. And since then it's just been success story after success story after success all around the world because law is for mankind.
It doesn't matter if it's Florida law.
You know, Italian law, UK law, American law, that's all legal.
If it has an adjective before it, that's legal.
Law is global.
And so it's working all over the world.
Actually, America's slow to the punch.
We have other countries that are just kicking ass.
And I think in the UK, they shut down three prime ministers in a row just by firing off notices.
Wow, wow, wow, that's powerful.
Yeah, I mean, this, I guess for the viewer, this class that you give, Law Common 2i, which we see the things I listen to the class, and then I listen to the recording at least one more time, if not twice more.
The benefit of it, which I think, what was it, like $999 for eight classes or something like that?
It's not even that. Actually, at the link, there's a free 45-minute training, so everybody can grab that.
And then we also have, you know, week one is free, and the donation, if they do want to move forward, It's under $800 for the eight weeks.
So it's under $100 a week.
Honestly, the best money I spent.
The best money I spent. I took the knowledge from someone else first and I thought this is the best thing I've ever done.
I mean, the logic that it armed me with that I just feel confident right now.
In fact, I mean, I might be a little sick in the head.
It's like I'm looking forward to the day where I have to use this stuff in court because it's just it's very hard for them to.
I mean, I have a feeling you go in there with that kind of lingo.
I mean, I'm talking about if the notices don't work or whatever.
They're probably going to want you to get the hell out of there as soon as possible because they're not going to want a jury to hear this stuff.
This knowledge is not something that they're going to want blasted in their courtroom.
I've been in court and seen them hold us until the end so they can clear the room.
Yeah, I mean, I've seen court cases where they just keep continuing it because they don't know what to do, right?
And they have to finally just walk away.
Yeah, it's powerful.
And you're right, they don't want other people knowing about it because you can explain it very clearly and very quickly.
Because law is far more simple.
Legal is, you know, takes 10 years, 20 years and 4,000 pieces of paper and all this, you know, pomp and circumstance.
But law, a farmer could scratch or a man acting as farmer could just scratch it on a napkin and express his law.
so yeah the pomp and circumstance of the way the law lawyers work is just so ridiculous like they can't say regular normal words they have to use the latin like and you know they all sound kind of similar but it's like oh you can't say the word ambiguous you got to use some like you know three kind of word latin phrase i mean it's just it's insane and it's all because they want to hide this knowledge from us because yes Like Jennifer's saying, this stuff is stupid simple.
You just have to take the time to learn it 60 days and you literally have more knowledge than a lot of these guys do.
Then 99.99% of the people on the planet.
Even just...
Watching the free webinar, you'll have more information than most people on the planet.
But if you go through the eight weeks where there's practice writing a notice every week and there's an exam and there's a claim practice, and if you muscle through that, you're light years ahead of anyone on the planet.
Awesome, Jennifer. I'd love to have you back on.
I'd love to have you on multiple times, actually, because there's so much more to talk about.
I hope there's some questions that will come out of this.
Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. You'll get questions for sure.
Once we post it, it'll be all over the chat and stuff.
Awesome. We'd love to have you back very soon.
Sounds good. Thank you so much for coming on Blood Money.
For the viewers out there, check out americahappens.com.
That's where all of our latest episodes will be posted.
We post new episodes daily.
▲
Export Selection