The Benny Show - Benny Johnson - 🚨Obama-Gate Breakdown DEEP Dive: Will Obama Be Arrested Soon? Intel Community Labels Him ‘TRAITOR’

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 21, 2025 - The Benny Show - Benny Johnson

02:09:54

🚨Obama-Gate Breakdown DEEP Dive: Will Obama Be Arrested Soon? Intel Community Labels Him ‘TRAITOR’

Participants

Main voices

benny johnson

01:00:08

david schoen

10:57

julie kelly

15:19

michael flynn

08:51

mike davis

18:23

Appearances

james clapper

01:14

tulsi gabbard

04:06

Clips

anna paulina luna

00:51

brian kilmeade

00:04

james comey

00:57

maria bartiromo

00:20

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbert, says new information is on its way regarding the declassified documents that show the Obama administration manufactured intelligence to create the 2016 Russian election interference narrative.
brian kilmeade ▲ ● ▼		So here we go.
		Doug Luzeder joins us now from D.C. with the latest.
		Doug.
unidentified		Here we go.
		Good morning.
		The Director of National Intelligence calls this a treasonous conspiracy.
		Some Democrats call the allegations baseless.
		DNI Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents and released them on Friday, showing, she says, that President Obama and other administration officials tried to shift the Russian election interference narrative after the election.
tulsi gabbard ▲ ● ▼		We are referring all of our documents to the Department of Justice for the purpose of accountability and action.
tulsi gabbard ▲ ● ▼		No one, no matter who they are, no matter how high up they are or how powerful they may be, no matter who the intelligence officials or professionals were who were a part of this treasonous conspiracy, there must be accountability.
unidentified		Critics say Gabbard is conflating two issues, whether Russia tried to directly interfere with vote counts and whether they were trying to influence the U.S. electorate.
unidentified		Gabbard, though, says more documents are on the way.
tulsi gabbard ▲ ● ▼		Next week, we will be releasing more detailed information about how exactly this took place and the extent to which this information was sought to be hidden from the American people, hidden from officials who would be in a position to do something about it.
unidentified		All right, back in 2017, former FBI director James Comey said this.
james comey ▲ ● ▼		No fuzz on this whatsoever.
		The Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle.
		They did it with purpose.
		They did it with sophistication.
		They did it with overwhelming technical efforts.
unidentified		We will no doubt hear much more about this in the days ahead, with Gabbard saying that the Russian narrative was what she calls a manufactured piece of intelligence.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Baby, who is ready for a very, very spicy Monday today, July 24th, 2025?
		And now you understand, ladies and gentlemen, what President Trump has been talking about for the last few years.
		You understand everything.
		It's all coming together, and it's very exciting to see it happening before our very eyes.
		Will we finally witness true accountability in our time?
		Something that we have been calling for on this program for literal years of our lives until our voices cracked.
		This is the moment.
		And we are locked in today with a super show featuring Julie Kelly, Mike Davis, General Flynn, and David Schoen.
		David Shoan, President Trump's attorney during his impeachment trials.
		So many brilliant minds that have defended our president against what we are going to uncover today in a massive deep dive.
		The true evils of the deep state, an actual insurrection that in fact took place on January 6th.
		January 6th, 2017.
		You just got the wrong January 6th.
		There was an insurrection.
		There was a coup.
		There was a seditious conspiracy.
		And we caught him.
		We caught him dead to rights.
		And Trump's been telling us about it for years.
		And ladies and gentlemen, now the trap has snapped.
		Trump posting videos of Barack Obama getting arrested while he grins in the White House?
		Time things come, we'll see.
		Ladies and gentlemen, as Tulsi Gabbard shatters the internet and political world as we know it by releasing the documents that expose the crimes of the deep state once and for all.
		And I believe we finally, finally have got it.
		Ladies and gentlemen, we'll see if Pam Bonnie at the Department of Justice can reel it in.
		My name is Benny Johnson, and this is The Benny Show.
		If you're smarter than our Deep State, then you'll want to keep the things that are precious to you hidden.
		The Deep State didn't do a great job of covering up their tracks.
		You should use Bunker in order to protect the things that are precious to you, like wedding photos, baby pictures, special memories, financial information, IDs, birth certificates, and passports, tax documents, wills, trusts, and insurance.
		Bunker can lock it all down for you.
		Bunker is created by cybercrime experts who have 25 years of experience in ensuring that you will never have a breach of your personal data.
		They've caught some of the worst criminals on earth, cyber criminals who steal your information.
		And ladies and gentlemen, now they're wanting to share their system with you.
		The Bunker Family Plan has a private messenger.
		You can share messages, photos, and files with your spouse, children, connecting only with people who you approve.
		Bunker, B-U-N-K-R, is where you should go.
		Bunker.life slash Benny, their website URL, bunker.life slash Benny.
		Use the code Benny for 25% off your family plan today.
		B-U-N-K-R.life slash Benny.
		Okay, ladies and gentlemen, a monster breakdown, of course, launched by Tulsi Gabbard, who is one of the single bravest public servants I've ever seen.
		I don't even use the word public servant, but Tulsi Gabbard deserves it.
		Tulsi Gabbard deserves our faith and support.
		She engaged in the single bravest act I have seen in my lifetime in Washington, D.C., and I've been covering this stuff for over 20 years.
		I've been very interested in politics since a young man.
		Maybe you've been around longer than me, but I can tell you that I've done an extensive historical accounting of the actions taken by people in the position of director of national intelligence.
		Nothing even comes close to what Tulsi did on Friday afternoon after our show, when we were all getting ready to pack up and go home.
		Tulsi drops this thread on X. And this thread is historically important because it's the first time that the deep state has come forward with proof of their own crimes.
		Because Tulsi, by every weight and measure, represents the beating black heart of the deep state.
		Let me explain that.
		Tulsi is in charge of 17 different intelligence agencies.
		She's the head of all of them.
		She's in charge of the CIA.
		She oversees the activities of all of those dark organs, and she's able to pluck the string and pull the threads and is able to see everything.
		And she's used her role muscularly over the last six months in order to create this manifesto.
		Don't miss it, ladies and gentlemen.
		Tulsi Gabbard, in her first salvo here, calls President Obama a traitor.
		Now, that's just, that's not Tulsi Gabbard, who ran for president and joined with President Trump on stage and decided to endorse President Trump as a Democrat, switch her party.
		This is the director of national intelligence saying that a seditious conspiracy, a traitorous cabal of bad actors usurped the will of the American people and engaged in crimes to take down the presidency of Donald Trump.
		This is in, of course, the year 2016 and 2017.
		It all happened on January 6th, ironically.
		It's too good.
		And we're going to break it all down for you right here before we get to our incredible slate of guests.
		Ladies and gentlemen, the guests who will be joining us today, some of them were targets of this cabal.
		Some of them had their lives destroyed, like General Flynn.
	Others, like Mike Davis, who will be joining us shortly, has simply been fighting this and has been telling this audience for years what was actually happening with the Mar-a-Lago raid.
	The Mar-a-Lago raid was actually about these documents.
	Oh yeah, baby.
	Let's cook.
	Here we go.
	Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people.
	Ladies and gentlemen, Tulsi Gabbard breaking it all down.
	Here we go.
	Tulsi Gabbard's report has, of course, broken the internet into, hold on, let me just grab the right thread.
	There we go.
	Yeah, that's the initial.
	This is the initial, and then this is the breakdown.
	No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
	The integrity of our Democratic Republic depends on it.
	We are turning over all documents to DOJ for criminal referral, says Tulsi Gabbard.
	So I'm going to cut everyone off of the past.
	I'm going to cut the comment section off of the past and say this.
	We're not here to cheerlead.
	We're not here for copium.
	We've used an enormous amount of energy on this program in order to rail against guys like Paul Ryan.
	Okay.
	And every time we get a chance to, we'll drag that man because that's a perfect example of a cucked, limp dick Republican who comes out and like promises the base something and then cowers and runs away.
	The example that we use is Paul Ryan going out of the border to squee and tell us he's going to build Trump's wall.
	This happened in 2017.
	Of course, Paul Ryan didn't even put up wall funding on the House.
	He controlled the House of Representatives with like a 30-seat majority.
	He could have given Trump anything he wanted and he didn't even bring the funding bill.
	He didn't even bring a bill to the floor to fund the wall.
	Complete and total fraud.
	We've been lied and suckered and had the football pulled from us too many times.
	Linus, Lucy, Charlie Brown.
	We're done with those games.
	We need actual legitimate prosecutions now, and they need to happen immediately.
	Tulsi Gabbard saying, I hear you, and it's going to happen.
	The DOJ has all of the evidence.
	Here's what they have.
	Their goal was to usurp President Trump.
	America is finally learning the truth about 2016 intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama administration to lay the groundwork for what is essentially a years-long coup against President Trump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our Democratic Republic.
	Here's how.
	And she shares this spectacular graphic, but let's break it all down into the, like, into the bones, okay?
	And in the bones, and we'll have on experts to talk through this because they've been fighting this for their, well, entire professional lives over the last 10 years.
	In its bones, here's what this graphic means: the intelligence agencies went to Obama and said Russia didn't do jack shit during the 2016 election.
	Sorry for my language.
	There's nothing.
	There's nothing there.
	Russia didn't hack our elections.
	Trump won and he won walking away.
	Obama said, not good enough.
	Bring me something else.
	I want a report that shows that Russia did hack our election so that we can smear slander, launch impeachments, and launch investigations against my successor here, Donald Trump.
	I'm not going to allow you, I'm not going to allow any of us to leave office until we have planted a poison pill that will destroy and kill the Trump presidency.
	I remember a chat a long time ago with Trump's top advisor, still working for him today, and the chat was off the record.
	So let me just frame it for you here.
	And everybody will tell you this from the first Trump administration.
	The Russia collusion hoax destroyed the first Trump administration, destroyed all of its potential, stole all of its energy.
	Everyone was constantly under investigation.
	Every person who worked for President Trump assumed that their lives would be destroyed, that they'd all end up like General Flynn, who'll be on our trail in just a moment.
	It kneecapped and killed in the cradle anything they could have possibly done.
	It stole from you everything that we were supposed to accomplish.
	The devastation and breakdown of this coup attempt, this seditious conspiracy cannot be overstated.
	It was utterly destructive.
	It wasn't something cute.
	It wasn't like a couple jokes.
	It wasn't like a couple of CNN segments.
	It literally destroyed the will of the American people.
	Trump did not have the presidency he was supposed to have.
	And all of its energy, the vast majority of the energy was poured into this.
	Why didn't we close down?
	Why isn't the border closed forever?
	Why did so many major accomplishments not happen in the first Trump administration?
	I think he had a good run in the first term.
	Why is this term so different?
	Because this didn't exist.
	This doesn't exist anymore.
	But it cannot be overstated how devastating this was to the president.
	For months, preducing the 2016 election, the intelligence community shared a consensus view that Russia lacked any intent or capacity to rig our elections.
	But weeks after President Trump's historic 2016 victory, defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed.
	On December 8th, 2016, intelligence community officials prepared an assessment for the president's daily brief, finding that Russia did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting cyber attacks on infrastructure.
	Before it could reach the president, it was abruptly polled based on new guidance.
	The intelligence assessment was never published.
	The next day, top security officials, including Comey, Brennan, Clapper, gathered at the Obama White House to discuss Russia.
	Obama directed the intelligence community create a new assessment that detailed a Russian election meddling.
	Obama officials immediately leaned on their allies and the media to advance their falsehoods.
	Anonymous intelligence community sources leaked classified information to the Washington Post and others that Russia had intervened and hacked the election in Trump's favor.
	You remember those reports?
	On January 6th, 2017, the true insurrection day, days before President Trump took his oath on the Bible, DNI Clapper unveiled the Obama-directed politicized assessment, a gross weaponization of the intelligence community that laid the groundwork for a years-long coup intended to subvert President Trump's entire presidency.
	According to whistleblower emails shared with us today, we know that Clapper Brennan used this baseless, discredited steel dossier as a source to push the false narratives.
	These documents detail treasonous conspiracy by officials, there it is, treasonous conspiracy by officials, the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and usurp the president from fulfilling his mandate.
	This betrayal concerns every American.
	The integrity of our Democratic Republic demands that every person involved be investigated and brought to justice to prevent this from ever happening again.
	I'm providing all these documents to the Department of Justice to deliver accountability to President Trump and his family that American people deserve.
	So that's the core of the report.
	Let's dive a little deeper, shall we?
	Catherine Herridge, who's done excellent reporting on this, will take you through the source documents here.
	There are at least four tracks of Russia collusion story.
	Context.
	There are at least four tracks to the Russia collusion story.
	Forgive me there.
	And again, Catherine Herridge is just such an excellent reporter on this kind of stuff.
	Newly, remember, Catherine Herridge was at CBS News.
	She was fired for asking too many questions about Russia Gate.
	She was fired from CBS for asking too many questions about Hunter Pied's laptop.
	Newly declassified DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, documents alleging Intel manipulation, use of the steel dossier to secure FISA surveillance warrant, unmasking scandal targeting General Flynn, predicate that opened the FBI's 2016 counterintelligence probe Crossfire Hurricane.
	Re-upping masking documents I first reported on in 2020.
	As you can see, the same names keep resurfacing.
	Clapper, Brennan, Comey, Lisa Monaco.
	You can see them here, ladies and gentlemen.
	Oh boy, Joe Biden was part of it too.
	This is a monster, monster break.
	And for this reason, let's click through the source tweet here from Catherine Teherj.
	Newly declassified records from DNI Tulsi Gabbard.
	Compelling evidence that the 2016 Russia occlusion narratives was not rooted in credible intelligence reporting, but manufactured to fit a political narrative.
	It all really boils down to the president's daily brief.
	And that's where they're getting this information.
unidentified		Let's talk about the PDB, as it's called.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		President's Daily Brief is, of course, the president learning everything that is going on in the world.
		A lot of this is classified, the vast majority of it.
		It's delivered every single day.
		The president gets a breakdown of where the American intel community sees threats, vulnerabilities, their take, their professional take on very important issues.
		It is the opposite of fake news.
		It needs to be rigorous, and you have to have a president that is informed of what is actually happening in the world.
		It can't be deep state septifuge.
		It can't be a psyop, because then of course the country will burn.
		It has to be real.
		The manipulation of the president's daily brief for political purposes would be a very grave sin to the Intel community.
		Maybe that's why there are whistleblowers coming forward right now.
		We'll get to that in just a second.
		This highly classified report, which is the daily national security analysis for the president, assessed Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent U.S. elections.
		They have it.
		We have the documents.
		Here's the document.
		Please.
		But after pushback from the FBI, then led by James Comey, the president's daily brief was spiked based on new guidance.
		Show the document, please.
		After the White House, after the White House principal, Klein is at the bottom of the tweet.
		After the White House principal's meeting, new intelligence assessment was commissioned and media leaks followed, reinforcing the narrative that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency and undermine the confidence of the system.
		What you're seeing on screen is the unmasked, declassified, which is insane.
		I don't think you've ever seen, there's never been a declassified president's daily brief.
		The fact that the Trump administration is doing this is the height of transparency.
		And I've, of course, never seen the deep state tell on itself, like expose its own crimes.
		It's remarkable.
		What we are living through is remarkable.
		This is remarkable.
		What you're looking at is the December 8th, 2016 President's Daily Brief stating explicitly Russia did not impact U.S. elections.
		Hours later, the FBI withdraws its support and they kill the President's Daily Brief based on new guidance.
		What did we learn?
		That Barack Obama was in charge of that guidance.
		That Barack Obama pushed personally to have Clapper Brennan, Susan Rice, and Annie McCabe and others concoct the Russia conspiracy theory and then to manipulate, to poison his president's daily brief in order to show that fraud.
		He commissioned a new intelligence assessment so that he could destroy his political enemy.
		We've never seen anything so evil.
		Margot Cleveland here, ladies and gentlemen, breaking it down.
		And here's further documents.
		Comey's fingerprints are all over this mess again.
		Comey was the first that Barack Obama went to.
		That'll be important later.
		But you can see here in the documents, it was first the FBI that said, no, we got to stop this.
		It was James Comey.
		Obama went to James Comey and said, you have to kill this.
		We have to launch something that destroys.
		And remember, importantly, James Comey is the one who whitewashed Hillary Clinton in this election.
		James Comey was the one who pushed the FISA warrant, where he lied to the FISA court.
		James Comey is the one who lied relentlessly before the Senate, before the House, on media.
		We have a supercut of it.
		We don't have time to play it right now.
		James Comey has lied about this and manipulated intelligence in order to attack General Flynn, for instance.
		ALX, you got to grab me that clip of him talking about Flynn.
		I got to get that in the show when the general joins.
		Obama is behind it all, ordering the assessment before Trump's in office.
		You can see Obama's urgency here in this breakdown.
		After the meeting with Obama, CIA leaks the Washington Post.
		You remember these leaks?
		You remember the wrap-up smear?
		Remember Nancy Pelosi specifically talking about it?
		We didn't even got to play it, but remember in a moment of absolute drunkenness or senility, I'm not exactly sure.
		Nancy Pelosi broke it down.
		You make up, she breaks down exactly how this operation is going to go.
		You make up something to smear Donald Trump.
		You leak it to the press.
		That's called merchandising it.
	And then you say, well, the press reported it.
	This is exactly what they did with Michael Isakoff at Yahoo News.
	It's precisely what they did with the original reporters who leaked the Russiagate story and the Steele dossier.
	Leaks to post included fake claims that formed the false narrative that Brennan later inserted into the report, Intel community report, that Russia interfered to help Trump.
	Whistleblower reveals he was sidelined when he objected to the findings.
	Whistleblowers, according to Tulsi Gabbard, are now coming forward and explaining exactly what happened here.
	Tulsi Gabbard says, get ready.
	We're just getting started.
	The Intel community assessment, not only affirmatively, but falsely suppressed.
	So everybody in the Intel community is like, what the hell?
	What the F is going on?
	What the literal F is going on here?
	We said Russia didn't interfere, and you're saying he did just in time for President Trump to get into office.
	Whoa, Clapper privately viewed the steel dossier as untrustworthy, but they shoved it into everything and it's untrustworthy because now we know that it was based on Russian spies.
	Russia did interfere in the election.
	They interfered on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
	We know this because, obviously, Ian Dranshenko and the reports.
	Not the her report.
	I'm getting my report.
	Alex, what?
	What's the other?
	help me out, Alex.
	What's the other report on, what's the report on Russia collusion that did nothing, that did absolutely nothing and got nobody, got nobody put in prison?
	Durham report.
	Thank you.
	Five years of Durham Report, and we got none of this.
	It's really a great question.
	The Durham Report.
	Why the hell didn't you expose any of this?
	Where was it?
	We know that Hillary Clinton put together a Steel dossier based on Russian spies.
	Where did Christopher Steele have his sources?
	Russia.
	What were the Russian sources?
	Fake.
	What was the intention of the Steel dossier to rig the election against Trump?
	Yes, Russia interfered on behalf of Hillary Clinton, according to the Durham Report.
	Stupid Durham.
	I haven't talked about him in so long.
	What a fraud, that guy.
	All of this was just sitting there and none of it made it into his report.
	None of it.
	None of it.
	We could have learned this.
	When did the Durham Report get released?
	When did it get released?
	2022?
	2021?
	We could have learned about this years ago.
	But instead, President Trump has to take a bullet to the head for us to get to this moment.
	Yeah.
	400 pages long, the Durham Report.
	400 pages long.
	2023?
	That bastard.
	And nothing.
	Yeah, ladies and gentlemen.
	None of it made it in there.
	It really makes you wonder.
	Really makes you wonder.
	President Trump has to get raided.
	He has to get a bullet to the head.
	He has to get indicted 400 times.
	Wild.
	So the breakdown is here.
	The documents are there.
	And Tulsi Gabbard states definitively that we are going to get more, ladies and gentlemen.
	Tulsi Gabbard cannot fathom.
	There it is.
	Starting about the John Durham thing.
	I haven't thought about that bastard in such a long time.
	Makes me so angry.
	Here's a great headline.
	Tulsi Gabbard cannot fathom how John Durham missed all of the evidence in the years-long coup against Trump.
	Incredible.
	There was one man who wasn't missing it, ladies and gentlemen.
	One man who refused to miss and who came on this show and made a lot of news and made a lot of enemies, frankly, by speaking the truth to this audience, by telling us what was happening during the Mar-a-Lago raid, by explaining the through line here, and never letting this bone go.
	He's an absolute bulldog.
	Ladies and gentlemen, his name is Mike Davis of the Article 3 Project.
	enjoy the show live now.
unidentified		Thank you.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		These people are complete and total frauds.
		Are they completely and totally effed?
		Mike Davis, the floor is yours.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
		And as we've been saying for three years on your show and just about every other of the more than 4,500 media hits I've done over the last years, last three years supporting, defending President Trump, this is a criminal conspiracy against rights under 18 USC, Section 241.
		When you politicize and weaponize intel agencies and law enforcement to go after your political enemies for non-crimes, that is textbook conspiracy against rights under 18 USC, Section 241.
		So I would say to these Obama and Biden Democrats, including President Obama himself, President Biden himself, and all these other people who participated and helped cover up this ongoing criminal conspiracy against rights.
		I would say to them, lawyer up because justice is definitely coming as I've promised and I'm going to make damn sure happens.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Can you explain what the statute of limitations is here, Mike?
		Is there any worming, snake, slithering wiggle room here?
		Are there any technicalities that they're going to be able to hide under a rock over?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, remember this back in 2016, you had President Obama and then Vice President Joe Biden and Clapper and Comey and Brennan and so many other goons make up the Russian collusion hoax.
		They worked with the Hillary's campaign, the DNC, the Steel dossier.
		You had Perkins Kooey law firm.
		You made up the Steel dossier.
		You made up the Russian collusion hoax.
		You were lying.
		You said that the Trump and his campaign were colluding with the Russians to steal the 2016 election.
		You fed this to the FISA court as bogus evidence.
		So you lied to the FISA court.
		You got an illegal spy warrant from this federal court.
		You spied on then presidential candidate Donald Trump.
		You continued to spy on Donald Trump when he was the president of the United States.
		You used his own FBI and his own CIA and other intel agencies to hobble his presidency.
		I remember when I went to the Senate Judiciary Committee at the beginning of his administration in 2017 and everyone was running around, including Senate Republicans, saying that Trump is a Russian asset because of this Russian collusion hoax.
		They destroyed his many parts of his first term.
		Now, it was still wildly successful because Trump is such a strong leader, but look what we're seeing now compared to his first term.
		And look at how much he's accomplishing now compared to his first term.
		That's what they were trying to prevent in his first term, his monumental accomplishments over the last six months.
		They tried to hobble the first time.
		And you talk about the statute of limitations, Ben.
		Generally, the statute of limitations for federal felonies is five years.
		So you say, oh, this was 2016.
		We're well beyond the statute limitations.
		Guess what?
		You're not, because this is an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
		When you conspire, in order for the conspiracy to stop, you have to disofou the conspiracy.
		The ends of the conspiracy have to end.
		They haven't.
		They are covering up the conspiracy.
		They are perjuring themselves.
		We saw perjury by high-ranking Obama officials during this ongoing criminal conspiracy.
		I think it was in 2022.
		So we're well within the statute limitations.
		And I would say to these Biden Democrats, justice is coming.
		I would be very, very scared if I were you.
		I don't think we'll put you in Mike Davis's gulag, the Viceroy's gulag, as we joke, as we troll.
		But justice is definitely coming.
		And I think the Bureau of Prisons will have plenty of space for these people.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		So it's very interesting because you have a shining record on this program of telling us what's going to happen in the future.
		You did this with Letitia James and with Fannie Willis, and it was a masterclass, Mike.
		It just rang like a bell.
		And people mocked you and they laughed at you and they memed you for saying that at the height of what seemed to be their engorged power that Letitia James and Fanny Willis, that it would snap back on them.
		And lo and behold, both of them are facing now their own federal charges and or their own prosecutions inside of the House or investigations inside of the House of Representatives.
		So Mike has a gleaming record on this.
		Talk us through what happens next.
		And if you don't mind, could you narrow it down to Comey, Clapper Brennan, and Barack Obama?
		Will Barack Obama be able to claim presidential immunity on this?
		Can you claim presidential immunity if you're committing a crime?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		You can.
		He might be able to claim presidential immunity for his actions while he was the president of the United States.
		And they'll have to litigate that, right?
		It's unclear whether he'll ultimately get presidential immunity for this.
		But I'll tell you this.
		It's an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
		And presidential immunity covers his actions while he's the president of the United States.
		They don't cover his actions when he's the former president of the United States.
		And when he's participating in the cover-up of this conspiracy, then he doesn't have presidential immunity.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		It's a major question that everybody is asking.
		And I'm getting some major pushback here from some of the usual suspects saying nothing will ever happen, Mike.
		No one will ever go to jail.
		It's just show.
		It's just the sparkler show.
		And it's poof.
		It's gone.
		Like there's no, it's not real ammunition.
		What do you say to that?
		And what do you say to the haters online that says nothing will ever come of this?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		I think these haters online need to learn how to win instead of just crying and losing and throwing their peas on the wall like petulant children.
		So we don't lose at the Article III project.
		We proved that over the last three years when the Democrats and most Republicans left President Trump dead on the side of the road, a dead political body.
		We went and picked him up from the side of the road and triaged him and made sure that he was back in the White House.
		And we're going to make damn sure at the Article III project very publicly, very loudly, that there is accountability for this unprecedented Republic-ending lawfare against President Trump.
		His top aides like Steve Bannon and Peter DeVara, who went to prison, his supporters on January 6th who were politically persecuted.
		These Democrats even went after parents for being outraged by gender chaos in schools and the resulting rapes in bathrooms.
		They went after elderly pro-life Christians for praying at abortion clinics.
		The Trump 47 Justice Department, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Cash Patel and Civil Rights Head Harmeet Dellon and Solicitor General John Sauer and so many others,
		Dan Bongino, the Deputy FBI Director, the president has assembled an all-star team at the Justice Department and they are working every day behind the scenes, putting big wins on the board for things that matter.
		Like 15 of the last 17 cases that they've brought before the Supreme Court, they've won on the emergency dockets.
		This is going to happen.
		This is going to happen.
		I'm going to make damn sure it happens because I am loud, I am vocal, and I am not going away.
		And I'm not like a cat.
		I'm not going to sneak up on you and jump on your face while you're sleeping.
		I am Cujo.
		I am a dog.
		I am barking down the street.
		I have been barking down the street for three years.
		And before I mull you and rip your face off to these Democrats, you know I'm coming.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		So what, like, what does that look like?
		We've watched President Trump get arrested.
		We've watched President Trump be brought in for mugshots.
		Will we actually see a President Obama, a James Clapper, a James Comey, a John Brennan mugshot?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Nobody is above the law.
		And if there is evidence that any of these people committed a crime, they will face accountability.
		They will face severe legal, political, and financial consequences.
		They try to bankrupt President Trump for non-fraud.
		They try to throw him in prison for life four times for non-crimes.
		They try to unconstitutionally throw him off the ballots.
		And Joe Biden tried to get President Trump killed twice.
		And I don't say that lightly, but Joe Biden intentionally underfunded Trump's Secret Service protection twice, said that President Trump was the gravest threat to American democracy.
		And Joe Biden actually used the word bullseye on President Trump and what the hell did Joe Biden think was going to happen after he did that?
		President Trump almost had his head blown off twice, one time by a millimeter and a millisecond.
		He was saved by the grace of God.
		President Trump is on a mission to save America from these evil Democrat Marxists who are subversive and who are trying to destroy our country from within.
		And it starts with their Trojan horse leader, Barack Obama.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		I couldn't believe the language that Tulsi was using, Mike.
		You always have this mealy mouth, limp wrist, limp dick language from Republicans.
		Like, we really hope that there's accountability.
		And we, you know, this is better for, you know, we need to restore norms, right?
		Another Republican administration would say it's about norms, okay?
		Like, right?
		Like, it's about the dignity of the office.
		Tulsi's straight out saying it's a seditious conspiracy.
		That's what Stephen Miller said.
		Tulsi said it's traitorous activities.
		These are legal words.
		How do you charge seditious conspiracy?
		How do you charge treason, Mike?
		Can you educate me?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, treason's where you lead a revolt against the government of your country.
		You're trying to take down the government of your country.
		It's usually working with foreign actors under our constitutional treason statute.
		But you may have that here.
		You may have that with the Steel dossier because you had the Democrats with the Steele dossier working with foreign governments to make up this fake intel to go after President Trump.
		And look, I've told you my theory of this case.
		This is why I think they did it.
		Hillary Clinton had her illegal home server as the Secretary of State, not only with our nation's most classified secrets, which is espionage.
		Maybe there's some Benghazi material that led to someone's death, like the ambassador's death.
		Maybe someone hacked that and that's how this ambassador was able to get killed.
		But separate from that, it had the Clinton Foundation pay-for-play foreign bribery schemes.
		The Clinton Foundation is taking millions and millions of dollars from shady foreign actors.
		What was Hillary Clinton doing in her official capacity as the Secretary of State to take this money to the Clinton Foundation to underfund their lavish lifestyle, their private jets and their glamorous travel and glitzy lifestyle?
		What was she doing?
		We'll never know because when she got subpoena, she destroyed her server with BleachBit, her home server in her closet.
		She took a hammer to her phones, clear obstruction of justice, clear conspiracy.
		Of course, nothing happens to her because she's a Clinton.
		But guess what?
		Maybe, just maybe our worst enemies like China and Russia hacked that server and maybe they had a copy of it.
		Maybe Russia was going to put out a copy of Hillary's corruption before the 2016 election.
		So maybe that's why Hillary Clinton and her campaign had to make up the Russian collusion hoax.
		So if President Trump's, so if this came out before the 2016 election, Hillary can say, you can't believe this stuff.
		This is a campaign dirty trick by President Trump.
		He's working with the Russians to interfere in our election.
		Don't believe any of this material.
		And you say, that sounds like a crazy conspiracy theory, Mike.
		How can you possibly think that?
		They did the same thing in 2020 with Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's laptop from hell.
		They had 51 former Intel officials working with the CIA, putting out BS that Hunter Biden's laptop of the Biden family corruption had all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.
		You can't believe it.
		And not only did they do that, they censored the New York Post, America's oldest newspaper.
		They colluded with big tech, Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple to deplatform the New York Post, take the story.
		You couldn't even get the New York Post story on the internet.
		And they censored everyone on big tech platforms who tried to share the story.
		They de-platformed them.
		They covered that up.
		And we know that if the American people in 2020 had known about this laptop from hell with this Biden family corruption, there's no chance Joe Biden would have been able to rig and steal the election.
		Trump would have won by a landslide, right?
		And so then President Trump was going to declassify Crossfire Hurricane.
		He fought the deep state for four years to declassify, right?
		And his own political people at the Justice Department, at the FBI, at the DNI, didn't do a damn thing until Rick Rennell and Cash Patel went over to the DNI and unclogged the drain of the swamp for the Intel community and got Crossfire Hurricane almost there.
		And then John Radcliffe, who became the DNI and is now the CIA director in Trump's second term, is the one who got Crossfire Hurricane declassified into Trump.
		But guess what?
		They never released it.
		Trump declassified it the day before he left office.
		The FBI, the DOJ ran to him and said, you can't release this publicly.
		It violates the Federal Privacy Act, which is a crime.
		You have to do a Privacy Act review.
		Well, guess what?
		They didn't do the Privacy Act review.
		They did the Mar-a-Lago raid.
		And then when they didn't get Crossfire Hurricane and Mar-a-Lago, that's when they worked with Tish James and Fannie Willis and Alvin Bragg and all these Democrats to try to bankrupt, throw in prison, take off the ballot and kill President Trump.
		It comes down to Crossfire Hurricane.
		This is all going to come out as part of this Crossfire Hurricane investigation by Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, Cash Battelle, Dan Bongino, and the rest of the all-stars in the Trump 47 Justice Department.
		This is a real crime by real criminals, and there's going to be accountability.
		And if it leads to President Trump himself, good luck, Barry.
		You might find yourself on the other side of a mugshot.
		And if you're continuing this criminal conspiracy, you might end up in federal prison.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		So you're saying that this all goes back, boils back to Hillary Clinton's server.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		And the crime there and the cover-up of that crime.
		it's been that same cabal, it's the same people.
		It's Clapper, Brennan, and Comey.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yep.
		And they remember they used all these bogus crimes that they say President Trump has committed, which he has not.
		These are non-crimes.
		It's not a crime to object to a presidential election, right?
		That's protected by the Electoral Count Act of 1887.
		It's protected by the First Amendment.
		Everything they say President Trump did, they are doing.
		They are gaslighting the American people.
		This is what the Democrat Party does.
		Today's Democrats are not liberals who love America.
		They're not our parents, our grandparents' Democrat Party.
		They don't just disagree with us on the best way to get there.
		Today's Democrats are largely Marxist.
		They hate America.
		They hate free speech.
		They believe in censorship.
		They hate equality.
		They believe in equity.
		They hate due process and equal protection of the law.
		They believe in a politicized and weaponized justice system.
		And as I always say, we cannot reason with these people.
		We need to destroy them.
		They only respect power.
		They only respect the sword, like they're Marxist Islamist foot soldiers who they imported to destroy this country.
		We need to destroy these people.
		And that starts with this conspiracy against rights under 18 USC Section 241.
		We need to investigate them.
		We need to have a federal grand jury indict them, and we need to put them in prison.
unidentified		That's the plane book, Mike.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		That was my final question.
		My final question to you was, how do you make it stick?
		How would Mike Davis charge this?
		So you would use conspiracy against rights.
		That's what you would lead with?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Would you include treason, seditious conspiracy?
		Is there anything else that I'm missing here?
		I guess maybe since that was my last question, here it is.
		Open floor.
		What else is the American public missing here?
		You've been waiting for this moment, Mike, because you've been explaining this, everything from the Mar-a-Lago raid all the way through to Hillary Clinton server and Trump's indictments.
		You've been tying it all together for a very long time.
		What is everyone missing here when it comes to these charges?
		What will happen next?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		The cleanest charge you can bring is conspiracy against rights under 18 USC, Section 241.
		This is an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
		There's no statute of limitation problem.
		It is clear-cut.
		This is one of the charges that President Trump, that Jack Smith brought against President Trump in the D.C. indictment with D.C. Obama judge Tanya Chuck and this radical lunatic Marxist who Obama put on the court.
		This another DEI Marxist who they pretend they put on the court because of diversity, but in reality, she's a subversive Marxist.
		They brought this against President Trump for the non-crime of objecting to a presidential election.
		Let's bring this against Obama, Biden, Hillary, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Big Tish, Big Fanny, Alvin Bragg, every one of these players,
		that goofy woman, Attorney General out in Arizona who charged Trump supporters, I forgot her name, Chris Mays or whatever the hell her name is, Andrew Weissman, he would love being in prison if you just watch him on MSNBC.
		We can give him martinis every night and he can be the prison bitch.
		So there is no shortage of people.
		And I did that for Media Matters because I didn't think I was being inflammatory enough.
		So I wanted to throw that martini comment about Andrew Weissman and the prison bitch for Media Matters.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Malta Cocktail Throne, Mike.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Yes, yes.
		We are, I would say that these people who pushed Norm Eisen, how did I forget Norm Eisen?
		There are so many bad actors who allegedly or could have participated in this ongoing criminal conspiracy against rights.
		Lisa Monaco, how did I leave out Lisa Monaco?
		She's like, she was the deputy attorney general.
		There was the DNI for Obama.
		I can't remember her name, some DEI woman who should not have been in that job, Alvin.
		It's like a diversity clown car.
		They pretend like they care about diversity.
		They pretend like they want women and minorities in these jobs.
		And then they rapidly go after every Republican woman and minority like Judge Cannon and Cannon and so many others.
		What they want are radical Marxists hiding under the guise of being a woman or minority so you can't attack them because then you're racist and sexist and transphobe and homophobe.
		I would say this DEI clown car needs to go to prison.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Well, here we go.
		The president posted it, Mike.
		And we know that you're very, very close with this Justice Department and that you're just one of the soundest advisors.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		I left off Ben Rhodes.
		How could I have?
		And Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, I got Clapper and Comey and Barry Obama.
		But yeah, I mean, I think that shady bunch, instead of having eight people on there, I think there are probably 80 or more.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Mike, Godspeed, man.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		I just can't wait to clip up this segment, baby, and put it on.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		Did I leave the heat today, Ben?
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		I started off a little bit docile, but I turned it up for you.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		It is what we call berserker mode for Mike Davis.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		And if you wish to, one last one.
mike davis ▲ ● ▼		I would say to Barack Hussein Obama, lawyer up, buddy, because your conspiracy after you left the White House could land you in prison.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		We're waiting, Mike.
		We're waiting for those days, and we're ready to rock.
		And we're ready with Mike Davis, who has been telling you what was about to happen for years.
		He's been right.
		I posted it this weekend.
		I just said, man, I'm glad I listened to Mike Davis.
		He's just one of those guys who comes on and tells you the future.
		And so you should be very uplifted by Mike's interview today.
		If you want berserker mode every day in your timeline, go follow Mike.
		He's got nearly half a million followers right here on X. And you should support the Article 3 project.
		Here's their website right now.
		Article 3 Project brings brass knuckles to fight leftist lawfare.
		Well, ain't that the truth?
		Mike, Godspeed, man.
unidentified		Thank you.
unidentified		you Amen.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Well, ladies and gentlemen, I have a feeling that that's going to make a little bit of news.
		It's incredible doing this.
		It's fun doing the show because we have been doing the show for long enough now.
		It's still a relatively young show.
		The show is only three years old.
		But we've been doing this stream for long enough now that we've had this incredible phalanx of guests and this real depth to what we've been able to discuss on the program.
		And you've been able to see who's a fraud.
		You've been able to see who's a liar.
		You've been able to see who's weak.
		You've been able to see who refuses to fight.
		And you can tell like instantly as soon as they get on.
		You know, from question number one, you can tell from the get, right, if they're ready to actually join the fight and win or if they're just going to back down and whimper.
		And we're done with that.
		We're done with the low testosterone.
		We're done with the people who aren't willing to play by the tactics that have been forced upon us.
		And it's warfare.
		And so you have to play by tactics to win.
		It is war.
		Someone's going to win.
		Someone's going to be losing ground.
		And someone's going to be going and being put in a place they don't want to be.
		That's just the nature of war.
		So Mike Davis brings that.
		And the best part about Mike's hits on this program is that they have just aged like a fine wine.
		Ladies and gentlemen, something that will age very, very well in your portfolio is gold.
		Advantage gold is the company that I use in order to secure physical gold and silver in my portfolio.
		I just diversify a bit.
		All right?
		A bit.
		But it's up to you.
		It's your own choice.
		But listen, man, I don't got to put up the charts, the tickers to show you how gold is performing right now.
		It's just been incredible, ladies and gentlemen.
		And, well, there's a lot of reasons for it.
		But most importantly, I want you to have security.
		I want this audience to be secure in the information that we're stating and to be secure also in their financial future.
		I want this audience to be rock solid, ladies and gentlemen.
		The U.S. dollar's dominance is under attack.
		There's a lot of forces around the world that are chipping away at it.
		Gold, ladies and gentlemen.
		I mean, I think the dollar should be backed by gold again.
		What do I know?
		Right?
		I'm not in charge.
		Why is gold becoming the number one hedge against the global currency shift?
		Well, ladies and gentlemen, you can find out by contact AdvantageGold today.
		You can move your IRA or 401k into physical gold, tax and penalty-free.
		You can get up to $10,000 in free silver and gold with a qualifying account.
		Text Benny to 85545.
		That's Benny to 85545 or go to advantagegold.com, advantagegold.com today.
		Well, ladies and gentlemen, it's definitely the F around us of times and the find outing us of times.
		As we have pieced through, as we will be piecing through with more experts on the show, just a reminder that Julie Kelly, General Flynn coming up, and David Schoen, who defended President Trump against the impeachments brought because of this hoax.
		Just a reminder that the president believes Mike Davis.
		The president is ready to act.
		President posting on social media, I agree with Anna Polina Luna, who has been saying, listen, we're done with a bunch of talk and no action from Republicans.
		Nothing changes until this happens.
		This is the actual meme.
		President Trump also on social media yesterday posting an AI of, well, we have the mugshots.
		We've already popped that up.
		But then President Trump posting an AI that was quite remarkable of Barack Obama talking about how nobody is above the law, along with, of course, a chorus of Democrats saying the same thing.
		And then this little video takes a pretty drastic turn.
		Get ready.
		Here we go.
unidentified		The future of MAGA is here.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		For Giotto Blow.
unidentified		I mean it.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		This is...
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		I've been your president.
unidentified		2024, we coming back.
		Joe Biden in the crowd taking naps.
		Innocent, hunter doing crack.
		Call me what you want, but don't call me a Democrat.
		They wanna put him in jail.
		But I write him in even if he's innocent.
		I write you in.
		Y'all need the dead dead.
		I'm still coming through your hood in my redhead.
		I might buy a MAGA chain, let me call my jeweler.
		I'm exposing all these rhinos like I'm Lurluma.
		We still don't have the manifesto from the trans shooter.
		Your girl like AOC, I want a girl like Brad Cooper.
		Woo!
		Real MAGA gang, you know how I rock.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		you I mean, the president posted it.
		So who am I?
		Who am I to doubt when Mike Davis is on here telling us that this is about to happen and Donald Trump's on here?
		Well, he is technically the top law enforcement official in the country, right?
		It's not actually the attorney general.
		Who has the power to fire the attorney general?
		The president.
		President's top law enforcement official in the country.
		Saying that Barack Obama is in real trouble.
		Ladies and gentlemen, very quickly, before we get to our next guest, I just want to get very quickly here to Tulsi Gabbard explaining her work.
		It's valuable because we know Tulsi.
		She's been a guest on the show.
		She's been a guest on the show a lot.
		We've spoken at events with her.
		We traveled with her.
		She's amazing.
		And she's great.
		I didn't know this was coming.
		I didn't know this was happening.
		I am blown away by the quality of this work.
		And Tulsi has been doing some strategic media hits to explain her work.
		And I think it's really important for her to lay out the findings here before we get to our next guest who had to defend against this seditious conspiracy, the president's lawyer, who will be joining us in just a moment.
		First, ladies and gentlemen, let Tulsi explain.
tulsi gabbard ▲ ● ▼		Well, this is the thing, Maria, when you look at the assessments that were made, not just by one element of the intelligence community, but in my role as the Director of National Intelligence.
		I oversee 18 different intelligence community elements.
		And in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community agreed that there was no intelligence that reflected that Russia was trying to hack the election in favor of either candidate.
		The evidence showed, the intelligence showed, that again, Russia did not have either the intent nor the capability to be able to impact the outcome of the United States election.
		So it was very striking when we look back again at the documents that I declassified and released that shows there was a shift in early December, the first week of December.
		Again, another document was produced by the intelligence community, a president's daily brief, that was consistent with every other assessment that was done previously leading up to the election.
		Russia was not, did not, this is after the election now, did not attempt to affect the outcome of the American election.
		That was never published.
		Hours before it would have gone into President Obama's President's Daily Brief, it was pulled by a senior level intelligence official saying that they had to pull it because they had received new guidance.
		The very next day, this meeting was called, a National Security Council meeting, bringing together all of the senior leaders of President Obama's cabinet, and the topic that was put forward was a sensitive matter.
		The tasks that came out of that meeting was coming from President Obama directing the intelligence community, then Obama's ODNI director Clapper, to produce a document, to produce an intelligence assessment that detailed not if, but how Moscow affected the outcome of the election that had already occurred, electing Donald Trump to the presidency.
		This document that they published in January of 2017 was the foundational groundwork that they continued to reference over and over and over again to enact this years-long coup against President Trump.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		You can't come out and say these kind of things as Director of National Intelligence without the goods.
		And they have so much more than they're letting on to.
		Now, I have been aghast and thrilled and delighted by the declassification.
		I've never seen anything like it.
		I've never seen the Deep State tell on itself.
		I've never seen the Deep State expose its own crimes.
		It's a remarkable thing, and we're not done yet.
		One final Tulsi clip, the whistleblower clip.
		We got to play it.
		Tulsi says, you think this is good.
		So we've covered everything up till now.
		You think this is good.
		Wait till you see what happens next.
		Tulsi just said.
		Tulsi says, no, no, no.
		The intelligence community is enraged by this.
		People know that they may be charged, in fact, if they were part of this conspiracy.
		And so now rats fleeing the ship, whistleblowers coming forward.
		And Tulsi says, the best, ladies and gentlemen, just wait.
		Watch this.
unidentified		Yeah.
maria bartiromo ▲ ● ▼		And do you believe that we will see prosecutions?
		I mean, our audience wants to know where this story goes from here.
		Will we ever see anyone held accountable for this incredible lie on the American people?
tulsi gabbard ▲ ● ▼		I will do all that I can.
		And we have whistleblowers, actually, Maria, coming forward now after we release these documents because there are people who were around, who were working within the intelligence community at this time who were so disgusted by what happened.
		We're starting to see some of them come out of the woodwork here because they too, like you and I and the American people, want to see justice delivered.
		So we're going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose.
		There must be indictments.
		Those responsible, no matter how powerful they are and were at that time, no matter who was involved in creating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people, they all must be held accountable.
maria bartiromo ▲ ● ▼		So do you expect, just to be clear, do you expect indictments and prosecutions?
tulsi gabbard ▲ ● ▼		I'm not a lawyer.
		In my view, we have the evidence to be able to move forward and bring about justice.
		Yes, to prosecute and indict those responsible.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, somebody who knows more about the teeth of this seditious conspiracy than any man alive, someone who was Trump's personal impeachment lawyer,
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		who's a spectacular attorney, and who has, well, ladies and gentlemen, a lot of gunpowder in his gut, as my grandfather would say, to be able to stand up before the Senate and defend President Trump at the height of this insanity, Ladies and gentlemen, a man you should deeply respect, David Schoen, joins the show live now.
unidentified		Outro music you you you you
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		David, welcome to the program.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		It's an honor to have you.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		It's an honor to be here.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Thank you very much.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Please, if you would, given your experience, and we have some old B-roll here of you on Fox defending the president, from these malicious lies against him that he's a Russian asset, it ended up getting Donald Trump impeached in part and led to what I would say the theft of so much of the energy and good inertia that every president should start their administration with.
		But you're the subject matter expert, so the floor is yours.
		What's your take on these, the classification of these documents from Tulsi Gabbard?
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Well, if the classification is key, but I hate to say this, but I'm not terribly surprised by the underlying information.
		It wasn't coincidental that Donald Trump was indicted multiple times during the same period of time, none of which had any merit in my view whatsoever.
		So they tried with the impeachment and they simply couldn't succeed.
		They lied, frankly, during the impeachment trial on a number of occasions, which was inappropriate.
		You know, this is a very important process, constitutional process for this country.
		And it was just absurd.
		You know, it got to the point where one of the House managers during the impeachment trial said, can you imagine any American suggesting that the election was stolen?
		And so I played a clip in my reply to that saying, you know what, we don't have to imagine any longer.
		And I played a clip of that senator saying, the only way Stacey Abrams lost the election in Georgia is if the election were stolen.
		The hypocrisy that's attended the attacks on President Trump over and over and over again is just outrageous.
		But look, it's not surprising because we know some of the figures behind it.
		Andrew Weissman, for example, who Mueller somehow made his top lieutenant in that Mueller, whatever you want to call it, misguided at best commission.
		The idea of making, this is the single most ethically bankrupt prosecutor I have ever had a case against.
		And I've had a longstanding case against him in which he put forward false evidence.
		He covered up evidence.
		He covered up evidence that someone else committed a crime for the people, not the people he was prosecuting, and so on.
		So you've got tremendous forces that were marshaled against President Trump.
		The idea was to paralyze the administration.
		Notwithstanding all of that, as I've said to President Trump, one of the most outstanding features of the administration is that even with all of those attacks going on, trying to paralyze his administration, look at all of the initiatives that he passed and you can count them, you know, one after another.
		Unfortunately, you know, it was cut short, but he has an opportunity now to reinitiate those things and more.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Could you please explain for us and perhaps elucidate seditious conspiracy is what Stephen Miller, he's the deputy chief of staff, I'm sure you know him, called this.
		Tulsi Gabbard has called it a treasonous conspiracy.
		To us, these seems like very legally charged words, and perhaps you could break them down for us.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Right.
		Well, there are both statutes and constitutional principles that attend them.
		But in essence, it's simply sort of, I suppose, how it sounds or how people might imagine it in their minds.
		That is someone working actively to undermine the government of this country, perhaps in coordination with a foreign government, but perhaps not.
		Simply to, in this case, undermine the results of an election for their own purposes.
		And the conspiracy, of course, is an agreement between two or more people.
		You know, we had a problem with this statute early in the previous century.
		It was construed too broadly and people who spoke out just against the government, which is one of our primary principles, a principle that you fight for.
		That is the right to free speech, whatever one's position is.
		This goes well beyond this.
		This goes to engaging machinations of government to undermine the results of an election.
		That's something that cannot be tolerated in this case.
		Just to the same degree, by the way, I don't know, same degree.
		Similarly, what we see going on around college campuses now and supposedly, you know, defended in the name of free speech, it's not free speech when it devolves into violence and attacks and threats and intimidation.
		And so here, when we have people operating the highest levels of government in the intelligence agencies, in which their work is shrouded in secrecy by necessity, but here they apparently took advantage of that shrouding and secrecy to try to get away with things, to try to get away with what's been described as an attempted coup.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Yes, is that how you would bring this case?
		I'm not sure if you've been asked.
		I know you have an impeccable relationship with the president, but how would you charge this case given the evidence that you know?
		Tulsi Gabbard says there are more whistleblowers as well, sir.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		I think that's right.
		I think there are obstruction of justice charges that could be brought based on the limited information we have here.
		But if it appears as Director Gabbard has said, and I'm sure she's telling the truth, then, and we'll see what the other documents show, there must be more, then I think you've got real, it borders on treason, if not crosses the border.
		If what was going on here was really trying to overthrow the results of an election based on false and contrived information.
		Those are very serious charges.
		We can't levy them yet until we see the evidence.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
		Sir, we have here a document.
		I want to put it up on screen.
		This has been released by the Director of National Intelligence.
		It's the President's Daily Brief, and we don't pretend to be the world's experts on them, but we know that they are highly classified and that they are directed by the Intel services in order to ensure that our commander-in-chief has the best information possible.
		This president's daily brief was, according to Tulsi Gavard and the receipts on the screen right now, manipulated by President Obama in order to show something false, in order to create this conspiracy theory and to handicap President Trump on his way out.
		How would you charge that exactly, right?
		I mean, that is the weaponization, truly the weaponization of what seems to be the most sacred or sacrosanct organs of our intelligence services.
		And it's a grave crime.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I mean, first of all, there are many broad weapons we could use to prosecute this case.
		And as I understood it, there's evidence now that behind the scenes, people even denied President Obama some of this evidence.
		But then they say that once he was aware of it, he was fully engaged in that process.
		I hope that's not the case.
		We shouldn't be surprised about people like, I suppose, Brennan and Clapper.
		Never before have I seen, at least in my career, a history of intelligence, top intelligence officials weighing in on political questions, signing on to political documents, and that sort of thing.
		That was outrageous, well beyond unseemly.
		But in this case, you know, you literally could have crimes like civil rights violations, denying people the right to their vote, denying candidates the right to really stand for office.
		That, after all, was the goal here.
		But also things like the seditious conspiracy and other charges, quite frankly, obstruction of justice, certainly, but I think many other charges.
		And the obstruction of justice is a relatively broad Statutory provision, it certainly would seem to encompass the conduct here.
		And I think maybe the most important thing of all of this is what you're doing, and that is publicizing this, bringing the facts to the public, so that people can be informed in the votes in their vote next time.
		Because, after all, exercising the right to vote is among our most precious freedoms in this country, and it's a very serious process.
		We deserve to have all of the information when we exercise that vote.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		David Schoen, very few people stood before the Democrats and the Senate and the House and represented and defended President Trump in what you might argue some of the darkest days of the first term of the administration.
		You certainly did that, and you were able to stare down this conspiracy.
		And we have the footage right here of it.
		Perhaps you could elucidate for us, what was this like?
		What enemy are we fighting here?
		What did you find out in this experience, David?
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Well, it was a great honor, quite frankly.
		And I really just got to know President Trump about two weeks before this when he called to ask me to represent him.
		It was a major honor for me.
		After all, I was a solo practitioner.
		I think I sort of made a mistake at some point because at some point during the course of the process, President Trump asked me to handle it all by myself.
		And I thought it was too big an undertaking.
		I'll tell you, a tremendous asset at the time was Judge Ken Starr.
		He showed great confidence in me and was very, very supportive of me when we spoke.
		I'd never met him before either.
		And he suggested, frankly, I handle it on my own.
		In some ways, I wish I had, but in any event, the result turned out okay.
		But no, what we saw here was really the manufacturing of evidence.
		For example, on the first day, we were supposed to just be discussing jurisdiction.
		I felt very strongly from a constitutional perspective that you should not be able to indict a former president, that the remedy for impeachment is throwing someone out of office.
		He was already out of office.
		But more importantly, and maybe, I was dismayed by the lack of the complete lack of due process in this, what they call snap impeachment.
		One of the members of Congress, a Republican member of Congress who takes the rules quite seriously, spoke out during the discussion in the House before the Articles of Impeachment were returned.
		And he said, what are we doing?
		This is unprecedented.
		No hearing, no discussion, no anything before impeaching a president of the United States.
		And after all, the Chief Justice should have presided if he were president, but here they manipulated even that.
		Chief Justice didn't want any part of that.
		And so they had Senator Leahy come on.
		The second time I was shocked.
		Senator Leahy seemed like a very fine sort of fellow, nice guy.
		But as I brought out in the thing, and some people suggested I shouldn't have done this.
		I'm very glad that I did because I think the integrity of the process demanded it.
		I said, Senator Leahy, how are we having you preside over these hearings, the impeachment of the United States president, when three weeks earlier you asked for his conviction and his impeachment, his conviction, and so on.
		And now you took an oath after that to be an impartial jurist presiding over it?
		That's outrageous.
		The American public shouldn't stand for that.
		And our constitutional process doesn't permit it.
		But anyway, it went forward.
		And in that regard, you know, it was a bit of a farce.
		I wish we had gotten all of the votes to stop it before it started because of the lack of due process and the constitutional impediments to it.
		But we didn't.
		And so instead of discussing the legal issues, Jamie Raskin and company just showed videos of what happened on the chaos on January 6th and all of that for an emotional appeal.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		So given the fact that you've been in this unique position right now in my entire timeline, there is screeching, wailing, and shrieking from Andy Weissman and from others on the left, your friend Andy Weissman.
		And they're saying that, of course, you can't arrest a former president and you can't prosecute a former president, which is a wild thing to level against someone like a show like ours or to somebody like you who had to do it in real life.
		What would be your retort to that?
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Well, I suppose we might have believed that a couple of years ago, but what we saw happen to President Trump is so outrageous.
		Quite frankly, you spoke to me about representing him in each of these criminal cases and the civil case and all that.
		I would have been honored to do so, but I kind of wanted to put in my own team if I were to do it.
		But it's always an honor to represent him in any proceeding.
		And here, especially, I suppose, because it went well beyond President Trump.
		It went to, as many have said, the weaponization of the criminal justice system.
		That's not in any way an overstatement of what happened here.
		Not only that, we saw a sort of shadow prosecution team.
		In each of the prosecutions, there was a shadow team operating behind the scenes in different variables.
		Andrew Weissman, Norm Eisen, and other people creating these suggested indictments.
		Now, remember, you know, Lisa Monaco, who was kind of really running the Justice Department under Mr. Garland, is an acolyte of Andrew Weissman, came up together in many, many overlapping situations.
		The idea that these people were then promoting indictments that should be brought and making suggested suggestions, you can be sure they brought them to the attention at the highest levels of the Justice Department.
		I've never seen that kind of vigilante prosecution team before.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Well, yeah, your dear friend Andrew Weissman seems to be not be not be going on TV much to talk about this.
		He's chirping a little bit, but everyone's been dead silent.
		It's a remarkable thing, David, to have watched all the yapping has suddenly stopped.
		It's amazing.
		I watched all weekend and nothing on this.
		It's remarkable.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		It's unfortunate they didn't take that position years ago, but they caused a heck of a lot of damage to this country and the hypocrisy that we saw.
		And unfortunately, you know, people buy it.
		If they read something in the media or whatever station he's on, Andrew Weissman says, people who follow those stations buy it.
		I agreed to do a show on the station that Andrew Weissman appears on frequently against my better judgment.
		I got that night about 50 death threats.
		So I spoke to them at the show and I said, you know, I got about 50 death threats last night.
		That hasn't really happened.
		I've gotten plenty of death threats before, but not in this kind of volume.
		So they said, oh, they're really sorry.
		You know, it's the left and the right and so on.
		And so I got a call from a journalist, Pula Sapper-winning journalist, the following day saying, oh, I saw you on the television last night on that station.
		I said, I wasn't on last night.
		I was on two nights ago.
		They chose to show an edited version, even worse, the following night.
		And now I got about 100 death threats.
		So people believe what they hear from these guys who are simply not telling the truth.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to reinforce those who fight with us and for us and for, well, let's just call it truth justice in the American way and a proper judicial system, please follow David Shoan.
		You can follow him here on X. He has 10,000 followers.
		And he is somebody who we very much look forward to having back on to explain the landscape here.
		And it's been really crystallizing for us, David.
		Thank you.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		Well, you're doing a great service by bringing these facts out.
david schoen ▲ ● ▼		I have to tell you that.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Godspeed, sir.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Please come back soon.
unidentified		Thank you.
		you you Amen.
		Amen.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, General Flynn is joining us from the airport.
		He's traveling right now, but he's this eager to get onto this program and to spike what may be a Moab, ladies and gentlemen, directly into the heart of darkness and the deep state.
		Welcome, General Flynn.
		General, your name is mentioned in these documents.
		You've been on our program for years.
		You've been writing books.
		You've been crying out from the wilderness about what they did to you.
		What a remarkable moment.
		And the floor is yours.
		The landscape has been set.
		General, what do you see happening next?
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, well, a couple of things.
		And I have made this recommendation that I think that all of these people that are involved, starting with Obama on down, they all ought to have their passports revoked.
		And people need to be checking private airplanes and private airfields for anybody trying to abscond the country and get the heck out of Dodge here.
		So that's number one.
		I do think that just as was done to President Trump when they raided his home at Mar-a-Lago, because they thought that there was, and they planted evidence there in that case.
		But I do think that what the DOJ should be considering, if not getting ready to conduct, is a raid of Barack Obama's home up there at Calorama in Washington, D.C., where he's been since he left the, since he physically left the White House.
		He's been running the White House all during the Biden regime.
		And I do think that there's some other places that need to be raided where there are likely a lot of evidence, a lot of receipts, so to speak, in many of these people that are part of the Obama White House, as well as the Biden White House.
		I mean, I just heard the great David Schoen talking about the former Deputy Attorney General Monaco, who also was the Homeland Security Advisor to Barack Obama.
		So that's number one.
		And those are things that need to be considered right now.
		And I was ready to wake up this morning to hear about some of these raids that should have been going on.
		There should, as a minimum, be a task force assembled of federal law enforcement authorities, as well as a assigned dedicated prosecutor at the DOJ level, at the attorney general level, someone who is working directly for her and for the president of the United States.
		This has got to happen very quickly.
		The other thing that I want people to remind people to look back upon, because part of my problem was Mike Pence, Mike Pence, former Vice President Mike Pence.
		And a couple of questions that I asked you, I think, over the last couple of days, Benny, that we need to remind ourselves during those first two years of Trump 45, we had the Republican majority in the House, Speaker Ryan, and in the Senate, McConnell, President McConnell, right?
		I mean, the president of the Senate.
		So those two also sat on what's called the Gang of Eight, which is a group of eight people inside of the Congress that get evidence on, you know, get intelligence briefings on every single thing that's going on in the country.
		So my assumption at this point in time, I don't know for a fact, but I got to believe because what Devin Nunez did in the March, April timeframe of 2017 was he came forward to the White House and said, hey, this is all fake.
		This is all fake.
		And Devin was then sidelined by Speaker Ryan from the House Select Committee on Intelligence.
		He was the chairman at the time.
		So there's some GOP dirt here that has got to be looked at because the American people have lost so much trust in all of the institutions of government.
		One of the things that Barack Obama did, he didn't just weaponize intelligence and weaponize the justice system.
		He weaponized the entirety of the government.
		And then he went in and weaponized elements of other institutions, like the education system in the country, like the healthcare system in the country.
		You know, there's parts of our government that run those things.
		But then what they did was they just enabled all of that, all these capabilities within our country to be weaponized.
		And he did it for eight years.
		And as I said the other day, in a post I put out, the deep state plan was really eight years of Obama, eight years of Hillary.
		And the strategy was to, was if Hillary didn't win, as we know what Peter Strzok and his lover, Lisa Page, talked about when they talked about we have an insurance plan if he wins, right?
		Well, the insurance plan was kicked in, and Peter Strzok is part of this.
		And I venture to say that there's going to be some people inside that are going to be, they are going to feel the pressure of going to prison.
		And when they do, they'll start to sing, like they say, right, in the movies.
		They're going to sing.
		And so I do believe that we have two things here, two big lines.
		One is, of course, what Tulsi Gabbard just exposed to the world and to the American people, which is the greatest crime in the history of the United States of America.
		Absolutely the greatest crime, a crime so bad that the majority of Americans, in many cases, still can't believe it that a coup would actually occur here in the United States of America by one president against another president.
		But that's, in fact, what we now are facing.
		Looking back, this other line is: what was the responsibilities of the GOP to do anything?
		A GOP, by the way, that was in the majority while President Trump was going through the initial stages and the selection of Mueller as an investigator to investigate this thing.
		You were just talking about Andrew Wiseman, who everybody knows is somebody who cannot be trusted.
		This guy has ruined the justice system in America because of his own behavior from past cases that he was involved in.
		So this is by far the greatest crime committed in the history of the United States of America.
		Thank God, you know, a former Democrat, now director of national intelligence, someone who saw the light, had the guts and the courage and the commitment to work really hard.
		And she took a bruising beating, Benny, as you know in the media over the last, let's just say the last six months.
		I mean, there was so much negativity about Tulsi Gabbard this and Tulsi Gabbard that.
		And what did Tulsi do?
		She quietly performed.
		And she has now exposed the greatest crime in the history of the United States of America.
		And now we've got to make this thing, we've got to make it right for the American people.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		General, I know that you're at the airport and I deeply appreciate your time on this program.
		And so hopefully we have time for a follow-up or two.
		I'll get to him very quickly.
		Here's your name in the actual documents.
		This is James Comey saying that he put a mark on you and that he's planning on trying to corner you and to rip you away from President Trump and to destroy you at the National Security Council.
		He's also admitted to this on camera.
		There's a separate moment where James Comey was asked about this and he said so, if we could just play it muted.
		But he is basically, we don't have the time to play it.
		He basically says, yes, I attacked Flynn because there weren't enough protections of the new administration.
		I was taking advantage of a nascent Trump administration.
		Now, what's your commentary on this now that it's all ripped, the guts have been ripped out and the black and white is out in the open?
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that man right there needs to go to prison.
		And there's a couple of others around him that were part of this coup, this attempted coup against the United States of America.
		We cannot have this happen in our country again.
		And the only way, Benny, the only way that we will not allow this to happen again for many, many years, maybe 100 years, is by holding these people accountable.
		And the guy that your audience is looking at right there, you know, they call him the Cardinal, James Comey, former director of the FBI, totally disgraced himself.
		But he participated in what is essentially the greatest crime in the history of the United States of America.
		So these people have got to be held to account.
		People are going to expect movement very quickly by this administration, by the Trump administration.
		We don't need years worth of investigations.
		All the evidence is right there.
		And thank God for Tulsi Gabbard.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Final question, General.
		Since you're a military man, you rose to the highest conceivable ranks within the military and within the civilian structure in the White House.
		Your credentials are impeccable.
		When Stephen Miller calls this a seditious conspiracy, when Tulsi Gabbard calls it a traitorous act, treason against our country, those seem like legal terms, but also really military terms.
		And since Barack Obama was the commander-in-chief, what angle would it be to go at this from a military perspective?
		Perhaps you could explain what does treason and seditious conspiracy mean from a military perspective?
		Would you advise them to go after them on those terms?
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		I would.
		I absolutely would.
		I would advise them to go after them on those terms and make sure that they have them locked in tight in terms of the legalities.
		But what I want people to understand is after World War II, we had the Nuremberg trials and there was a lot of people that were found guilty.
		And because they stood at, when they got on the stand, they said, well, I was just following orders.
		Well, Jim Clapper, John Brennan, Jim Comey, Susan Rice, Sally Yates, and many others, Lisa Monaco, many, many others.
		You're not going to get away with it.
		If Barack Obama directed you, and it appears that he did, this is very intentional.
		This 8 December 2016 meeting that they had where it looks like, which was something that was not on my radar, Benny.
		So this is a new piece of evidence that Tulsi has exposed.
		That to me, in addition to some of the other critical criminal evidence that has been discovered, yeah, I think that they're going to have to look at conspiracy, treason, traitorous activities by some of these people, and particularly starting at the very top, and that would be Barack Obama.
		They were ready to convict and throw Donald Trump in prison for the rest of his life, Benny.
		And so, you know, all bets are off when it comes to immunity.
		There's no immunity for this president, not President Obama for what he did.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		So could you have a military tribunal for the innovation?
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		I don't know, but I thought it'd be explored.
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		then it should be explored.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		General Flynn, who has been so right on this, who has fought and actually accept who And it must be a profound moment.
		Everyone follow General Flynn.
		I know he has a flight to catch, but any parting thoughts?
		And here, by the way, is pardon of innocence, if you wish to read the full story.
		But any parting thoughts, General?
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and I think everybody just needs to stay focused, you know, support President Trump.
		And, you know, and we've got to make sure that we demand accountability from the government that is supposed to serve us, right?
		It doesn't serve itself.
		It serves us.
		So that's really where I'm at.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
		Godspeed, general, and we look forward to having you on regularly to talk through this with our audience.
		Godspeed.
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
michael flynn ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, Benny.
unidentified		Thank you.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		you you Ladies and gentlemen, we are rocking and rolling.
		Don't you go anywhere?
		Julie Kelly is getting locked in to talk about the Obama sisters.
		Hey, Alex, make sure we grab that article from Julie's Substack.
		The Yaya Sisters of Barack Obama.
		You want to talk about where the actual conspiracy begins?
		Julie Kelly is going to take you through some names you may or may not know who truly hatched and launched the actual hatchet team that did this.
		The ones who really put the bodies in the ground, who understand how the mechanisms of this were hatched.
		Julie Kelly is going to expose all of it, ladies and gentlemen.
		I need more coffee this morning.
		I'm all out.
		I need more coffee in my mug.
		My blackout coffee went a little too fast.
		We had a delightful and excellent weekend, but there was a lot of news to break and we've been working really hard.
		And I got to tell you, I probably needed another pot of coffee this morning.
		Go through about a pot of coffee a day.
		If you're going to drink a pot of coffee a day, it better be damn good coffee.
		And blackout coffee is great coffee.
		It's good coffee.
		It fills my cup and it keeps the show powered and going.
		Ladies and gentlemen, blackout coffee is the American dream.
		Started in a garage.
		Now they have this massive facility.
		They employ Americans.
		They roast their coffee in-house.
		It's no grift.
		It's just excellent coffee and it just keeps us powered because, well, we know that we're supporting the people who support us.
		You should try blackout coffee.
		I'm telling you, you won't, you won't ever go to another coffee brand ever again.
		If you believe in hard work and American values and coffee that powers this program, ladies and gentlemen, blackout coffee for you.
		Blackoutcoffee.com slash Benny.
		Use the code Benny for 20% off your first order.
		Support the American Dream and drink Blackout.
		That's blackoutcoffee.com slash Benny.
		Stop settling and drink real coffee.
		All right, ladies and gentlemen, we have on someone who has been, again, calling in the wilderness about this issue when it was very lonely and when she was truly the only voice out there.
		In fact, she has the sub stacks to prove it.
		Let's pop it on screen just very quickly here.
		The Obama-era sisters circle Trump.
		Would you look at that?
		Isn't it nice to be able to just stamp it?
		August 30th, 2022.
		Julie Kelly writing about the trio, Susan Rice, Avril Haynes, and Lisa Monaco, and how they are in charge of targeting President Trump.
		And they have been for a very long time since the true insurrection date, January 6th of 2017.
		Now we have the documents.
		Will the Yahya sisters here be going to prison?
		Julie Kelly joins us live to talk about it.
unidentified		Music.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Julie, welcome back to the program.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Boy, got to tell you, I don't know between you and General Flynn and Mike Davis, who is the rightist on all of this, but all of you must be riding very high because your work has aged like fine wine.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		Well, Benny, I mean, I take a back seat to people like Molly Hemingway and Sean Davis and Chuck Ross and others who really, you know, helped blow the lid off of Russia Gate early on.
		I did cover it as well.
		But I think what we're talking about, Benny, in terms of what is reported, a grand conspiracy investigation that dates back to now, what we'll talk about these documents that Tulsi Gabbard released.
		What I wrote about in 2022 is how those same Russiagade perpetrators, Avril Haynes, Susan Rice, and Lisa Monaco, then went on to work at the highest levels in Joe Biden's presidency.
		Avril Haynes, who is at, all three of them were at that December 9th, 2016 meeting at the White House that the president convened and that we just learned about on Friday.
		So all three of them, Avril Haynes went on to be really Tulsi Gabbard's predecessor, Director of National Intelligence.
		Susan Rice was domestic policy advisor.
		And Lisa Monaco, Deputy Attorney General, running the Department of Justice, basically with Merrick Garland as a figurehead.
		So I'm working on a piece on Lisa Monaco right now.
		Hopefully I'll be able to come on later in the week and talk about it.
		But this is the common thread between RussiaGate all the way through the Biden presidency up until the end of 2024 when they were still trying to hang on to those two criminal indictments against the president and somehow manage to figure out a way to put him in jail throughout 2024.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		So I want to just take a quick step back.
		And we were bothered by this question right off the top of the show.
		But you're the perfect person to ask it since you've been covering this so closely.
		John Durham, what the hell?
		Like, what happened with all of this evidence over the last 10 years?
		It's clearly been sitting there in a file drawer somewhere.
		It could have been found.
		It seems like quite easily because it's a very thorough report.
		You said, of course, Lisa Monaco was there.
		Not Lisa Monaco, sorry, Avril Haynes was there in charge at the Director of National Intelligence.
		She clearly had all this evidence, right?
		Like you understand the cover-up there.
		What the hell went on with John Durham?
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		I mean, it's hard to say.
		And I think that that's something that Congress really needs to look into as they're, you know, this multi-hydra headed scandal, unprecedented scandal in American history.
		Where do you start or where do you continue what has already been underway?
		But certainly John Durham's report and other reports related to the scandal, you know, where were these documents that Tulsi Gabbard released?
		Where were these email exchanges?
		Why did we not even know about this December 9th meeting until Friday.
		In fact, I went to my top source, Lee Smith, on Friday, who has covered this, as you know, in three books, produced a movie about it.
		No one knows this, I think, better than Lee.
		And I said, did we know about this December 9th meeting before?
		And I covered it as well, not as in depth.
		And he said, no.
		So that meeting of those Russiagate perpetrators, including President Obama, the Obama sisters, John Brennan, et cetera, Jim Comey, how did John Durham not know about that?
		So I think that that is something that we need to find out.
		But moving forward, Benny, then, what does the Department of Justice do now?
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		You had Telsey Gabbard, as you know, and you've already talked about, calling this a treasonous conspiracy.
		You have CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and I know there are questions as to how he did not get his hands on these documents during the first Trump presidency.
		Nonetheless, sending criminal referral about John Brennan and Jim Comey related to that bogus intelligence community assessment that was the product of that December 9th meeting.
		So, you know, the DOJ, FBI, and Congress have a lot on their hands, but people want accountability.
		And it's hard to see at this point, Benny, where criminal charges are not brought against a few, if not many, of these Russiagate perpetrators.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		We've gotten some very wildly interesting answers and divergent answers.
		Mike Davis says conspiracy against rights.
		David Schoen is saying that, you know, there are a slew of things that you could charge them with, but he's a civil rights lawyer and he took the civil rights tact that you're depriving the people, obviously, of their vote.
		And then General Flynn says, you know, put them in a military gulag and charge him with treason, right?
		And that's very General Flynn.
		Given the fact that you've seen maybe all of those charges brought against President Trump by these people, what would you advise here as far as carving up this whale?
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		So I'm also working on a piece about this, Betty.
		I've got like six different articles working on.
		And you can imagine if you want to make them thorough, though, it takes some time.
		And I've actually been working on a seditious conspiracy article and how the DOJ might be able to apply.
		Now, keep in mind, this is a post-Civil War statute that the Biden DOJ dusted off to use against two dozen J-6ers, January 6 defendants, who were members or alleged members of the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys.
		Now, this statute, seditious conspiracy, traditionally has only been used against foreign terrorists.
		For example, the perpetrators of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
		The DOJ brought seditious conspiracy charges against those individuals.
		Fine.
		But the DOJ watered that down, egregiously watered it down to bring this, and it is comparable to treason, against two dozen J6 defendants, some of whom were not even in Washington, D.C., some of whom didn't even go inside the Capitol.
		Only one had some sort of weapon, I think, you know, a pocket knife or something.
		And so if you can use that against people who committed no violence, who had no plan to overthrow the government, and using how the DOJ, the Biden DOJ brought those charges, what they put in their indictments and what the jury instructions were in both of those, in all of those trials.
		There were three Oathkeeper trials, one Progressway trial, the jury instructions.
		It's hard to see how this Trump DOJ could not now pick that up where the Biden DOJ left off and use seditious conspiracy and draw this, you know, pull this thread from the Obama White House all the way through to the Biden regime and attempting to do the very same thing,
		which is to sabotage the president and, you know, and set him up if he did win, again, another illegitimate presidency.
		And that's what they were trying to create.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		And they got convictions on those charges, Julie.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		They did.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		For seditious conspiracy.
		So the question, of course, in a moment like that is, did they have the power to overthrow the U.S. government?
		And of course, that's laughably no.
		Yet these people did have the power to overthrow the government.
		They used the most powerful intelligence community resources known to man and they weaponized them against Donald Trump.
		So it seems like a much, it seems like that charge might stick, Julie.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		I think that it probably has.
		Now, Mike Davis, of course, I always defer to him as well.
		So conspiracy against rights is probably one of the options on the table.
		But I know speaking for a lot of J6ers, they would love to see seditious conspiracy thrown back.
		And this was also, I believe, if Donald Trump had lost the election, that Jack Smith would have brought seditious conspiracy charges in a superseding indictment against the president had he lost.
		I think that they were still holding that in their back pocket.
		I think you and I even talked about that in 2023 and 24, what they would do if Trump lost.
		So there is a little caveat in there in the seditious conspiracy by force.
		But again, and I'll explain this in my piece and come back on and explain it even further.
		They said physical force wasn't necessary, that any sort of force, that they planned to use force.
		Well, it doesn't have to be physical force.
		I mean, when you have the full force of the intelligence community, the White House, the Oval Office, the DOJ, the FBI, CIA, every single major, powerful, unaccountable government agency coming down on your head, how can you say that's by force?
		That's way worse than someone opening a door with Capitol Police standing right there, going into a government building on a Wednesday afternoon.
		So anyway, I'll be doing, I'm working on a deep dive there, but I do think that that should be one of the statutes on the table for the Trump DOJ to consider.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Right here, Julie, is Stephen Miller, who is a friend of the show, hasn't been on in a while.
		He's been a bit busy.
		But Stephen Miller calling it a seditious conspiracy.
		And he's a very wise legal mind and the architect, of course, of so much of what's going on at the DOJ and Homeland Security and law enforcement in America.
		So he's using that terminology.
		He's preferring, he's leading with seditious conspiracy is what it seems like Stephen Miller is leading with.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
		Well, I think, of course, he is correct.
		And it does.
		And if he's saying it, sort of signals to me and others that that might be the statute that they are pursuing.
		And the great thing is that they have got recent history of how the Department of Justice and judges signed off on that.
		So you had two judges in Washington, D.C. who allowed that charge to go forward against J-Sixers.
		Trump appointee Tim Kelly, Obama appointee Ahmed Mehta.
		They were the ones who refused to dismiss that charge against J-Sixers, including, of course, nonviolent ones, ones who were not in the Capitol that day, some who didn't even go inside the building.
		Enrique Tario was in a Baltimore hotel on January 6th, sentenced to 22 years in prison on a seditious conspiracy conviction.
		So, and the government, the Biden DOJ, again, comparing this to treason, adding terror enhancements to those sentences so they could throw people like Enrique Terrio in jail for, you know, most of his life.
		Now, of course, they're all released now because the president commuted all of their sentences.
		Some of them still have not been pardoned on the seditious conspiracy conviction.
		However, the Biden DOJ left a whole roadmap.
		So did those two judges.
		So the Trump DOJ can consider how to apply that to some of these key perpetrators.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Seems like there's quite a bit of a roadmap that's being uncovered.
		Julie, would you mind if we did some breaking news?
		That's right in your wheelhouse.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		We do this all the time, Benny.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Senator Grassley.
		Yeah, that's right.
		Well, let's do a breaking news, Dick.
		I mean, just in case.
		Yeah, here we go.
		Breaking news.
		Let's go.
unidentified		Let's go.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Senator Chuck Grassley, head of the judiciary, says newly declassified documents show DOJ Inspector General concluded that Comey's run FBI failed to conduct a thorough and complete investigation into the Clinton email scandal.
		Well, would you look at that, Julie?
		His team ate up the steel dossier lies and chased after Russian collusion hoax, but took kid gloves against Hillary Clinton.
		Now, David Schoen and Mike Davis were both on here saying a lot of this connects back to Hillary Clinton's illegal server.
		And so much of this was intended to cover all of that up.
		Your take, Julie.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		I mean, I think that this is another important aspect.
		Going back to the timeline of July, so remember that press conference that Jim Comey gave, I believe it was July 5th of 2016, where he admitted that she had classified documents on her email server, but that he said no, what did he say?
		No prosecutor would pursue charges against her, something along those lines.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Reasonable.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		No reasonable prosecutor.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
		All right.
		So you're younger than I am.
		You can remember nine years ago.
		I can't.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		I couldn't remember John Durham's name earlier on the show.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		I feel better.
		I feel better.
		So, but then immediately after that, remember how WikiLeak, the release of the emails off the DNC server.
		And that demonstrated how the DNC was helping Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.
		That resulted in the ouster of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz as the DNC head.
		So the Democratic Party was really in disarray after this.
		And Hillary Clinton still under fire from media and others and being investigated, you know, still under fire for this.
		So they needed something, right?
		So then the end of July 2016, crossfire hurricane opens against four Trump aides, including General Flint.
		So this was also a diversion away from that.
		So this is just another angle of things that we are going to be finding out.
		Now, what could possibly happen with that?
		I don't know.
		You know, we're running up.
		This is nine years ago.
		So it's going to be tougher to prosecute someone like Jim Comey because there's no common threat.
		He wasn't in the Biden administration, the Biden regime, where he could continue dirty work against President Trump and his allies.
		That's not the case with Lisa Monaco, Avril Haynes, Susan Rice, and others.
		So I'm not, this will be interesting to see, but I don't really know what kind of action can be taken after that.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Mike said that it was because the conspiracy is ongoing, it never ended.
		And the statute of limitation ends when the conspiracy ends.
		And they've never admitted this and they've never been punished for it.
		So that's what Mike says anyway.
		We'll leave it to smarter minds, but this is one that I really got to ask.
		And something that, of course, really popped off in my timeline.
		According to these files, there's no credible evidence that Russia ever hacked the DNC.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		No.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Julie, you were just talking about it.
		So, well, what does that lead us to?
		What assumptions then must we take?
		Because the line, the official line has been that the DNC was hacked by Russia and then they manipulated all the emails in order to insert creepy stuff in there, spirit cooking dinners and so on, right?
		None of it's real.
		It's all fake.
		Don't even talk about it.
		Right.
		But it seems like the intelligence community is saying, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
		Russia never hacked the DNC.
		So we're left to simply assume that what, Julie?
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		Well, that's a big question.
		There's some speculation as to how those emails were obtained and released.
		But I will say we've known plenty of reporting on this, including myself, Sean Henry, who is the CEO of CrowdStrike, who was hired by Fusion GPS, I believe, or the DNC to Look into that hack.
		So then they came out with this report.
		Yes, it does have fingerprints of Russian intelligence.
		I think one of them was Gusefer.
		That was the name, Gusefer 2.0.
		He's tied to the GRU, the Russian military.
		And so he's the one who got it.
		But then Sean Henry later, when he had to give testimony to Congress, admitted that they never even saw the devices.
		They never saw the email server.
		They had no hard copies of anything.
		So CrowdStrike also complicit in this lie that the Russians hacked the DNC email system.
		So this just confirms it once again.
		So who did?
		So how did the emails, who obtained them?
		How were they released?
		And this represents another cover-up of this massive scandal.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		I mean, you simply left to assume that all of it's been a lie and that they're 100% authentic.
		And I think most people in this audience already believe that.
		But then if that's the case, then there's a lot of questions that are going to be asked of Hillary Clinton.
		Now, there's reports that Hillary Clinton and her team were aggressively pushing Barack Obama to launch Russia Gate.
		We'll wait to see those documents.
		Perhaps that's what Tulsi Gabbard is telling us is going to be dropping soon.
		We're not sure.
		But Tulsi Gabbard is saying not only are there major whistleblowers from inside the IC, but also that there's a lot more to come.
		And at what point do you begin to pull the threads back to Hillary Clinton?
		Could she potentially be culpable in any of this?
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		I doubt it.
		I mean, let's cut to the chase.
		No one's going to indict Hillary Clinton.
		No one's going to indict Barack Obama.
		So we can, I think, disabuse ourselves of that vision or that.
unidentified		Really?
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		You don't have Obama?
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		No, no, no, no, no, no.
		And, you know, of course, you've got the issue with Barack Obama.
		What would you charge him with?
		We have the immunity ruling from the Supreme Court really a year ago that carves out only specific instances where a president in office could be held criminally liable.
		And I'm sure that Barack Obama, if anything came down, would be smart enough and his lawyers would figure that out.
		So no, but look, I really want to see the henchmen like Lisa Monaco.
		And I know I keep going back to her, but look, she also ran the Biden DOJ.
		So she was the one that really ran the first two invest the two investigations into the president for classified documents and for January 6th.
		She, I'm sure, worked with special counsel Jack Smith, was involved in his appointment.
		People from the DOJ leaving the Department of Justice, going to the special counsel's office.
		Chuck Grassley, just last week, I believe, the last several days, releasing emails showing how Tom Wyndham, another prosecutor who went to the DCUS Attorney's Office, which was in constant contact with the DOJ, I'm told, specifically Lisa Monaco's office, how he was pushing top down the FBI to open this January 6th investigation into the president, which of course they did.
		So I'm looking for a lot more records related to that as well.
		And so those are the people who I think are the most likely to be held responsible, criminally liable, and the ones who should be.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		You posted about, and the final question here, you posted about the whistleblowers that Tulsi Gabbard is talking about.
		Right now, you've done a ton of reporting, obviously, on the Intel community.
		What do you think could potentially be unveiled?
		What do you think this is going to go next, Julie, given your deep and rich experience in these kind of conspiracies and knowledge of some of the key players?
		What do you think the whistleblowers will say?
		What do you think is going to happen next?
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		Well, there is a whistleblower cited in the documents that Tulsi Gabbard released on Friday.
		So I would assume more will step forward and even perhaps whistleblowers who during the Trump presidency, because of course he took office in late January 2017, who were still fighting the deep state intelligence types.
		And remember, even the Ukrainian gate, the quid pro quo, the phone call to Zelensky to look into the Biden family corruption, which we now know exists as well.
		So there could be some sort of nexus to that also.
		So because everything is so connected and because there are so many bad actors and still are in the federal government, even more so during Trump's first term, I would assume that you'll have whistleblowers discussing not just this, but other intended sabotage operations against the sitting president during his first term.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Well, ladies and gentlemen, if you want to find out about what is happening now, you can go back and read Julie Kelly's sub stack.
		Here's the article, by the way, that I would point you to.
		The DOJ.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		Oh, that's a DOJ button.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		That's an YAYA sister button.
unidentified		That's a fake.
julie kelly ▲ ● ▼		That's a fake whistleblower.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		There we go.
		All right.
		Obama-era sisters circle.
		They circle Trump.
		Yes.
		It's always been the same one.
		That's Samantha Power, man.
		Creepy little video of her in Hungary, ahead of USAID.
		It's amazing.
		She was the head of USAID, and she's like, I can't wait to engage with partners here in Hungary to try and topple the governments here.
		And it's like, oh, it's like, God, it's so dirty.
		They're so filthy.
		And Julie Kelly's been calling them out for years.
		So please subscribe to her sub stack and then subscribe to Julie Kelly here, who is just a few short of a million subs on X. Ladies and gentlemen, the people who are fighting for us, fight with them.
		Thank you, Julie.
unidentified		Thanks, Dani.
		Bye.
		Bye.
		you you you Boy, look at that.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Senate Judiciary right here.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Newly declassified DOJ Watchdog report shows FBI cut corners in Clinton email investigation.
unidentified		Well, well, well, would you look at that?
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		The timing here has been utterly impeccable.
		It's just been wild to watch the rollout.
		It's like the team is just hitting on all cylinders and they're coming at them from all fronts.
		And it's a multi-pronged attack.
		And it's devastating.
		It's been devastating.
		Somebody who will be joining us, I believe, tomorrow is the great Annapolina Luna, who has a government weaponization committee that she's in charge of, who she tells me is she is working overtime on this, and she is going to be leading the congressional assault against this conspiracy and coup.
		Annipolina Luna on TV just this weekend, explaining how many years in prison those who are prosecuted for false intelligence reports will send.
		This is an interesting tactic that hasn't been discussed on this show when you doctor or manipulate an intel report.
		Well, what happens to you next?
		Here we go.
anna paulina luna ▲ ● ▼		You saw with the report that Tulsi put out, I mean, we're talking about there needs to be criminal prosecution and arrest.
		You know, lying under oath, putting out a false intelligence report, that's a violation of 18 U.S. Code 1001 that comes with a seven-year prison sentence and up to $250,000 fine.
		But we're talking about something more nefarious than this.
		I think that this is a perfect example and reason why there needs to be FISA reform as well.
		As you know, Maria, that false intelligent report resulted in FISA courts issuing a warrant to illegally surveillance the President of the United States now.
		And what I can tell you is if we don't stop this, if we don't actually say this will not be tolerated, this is not a Democrat or Republican thing.
		This is about the health and the sanctity of a constitutional republic.
		And so there needs to be arrests.
		This is not partisan.
		This is simply illegal what they did.
		And we're simply upholding the law.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Lucky for us, the banality of evil will cut in our direction here.
unidentified		The banality of evil.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Evil is very haughty.
		It's very prideful.
		It's very boastful.
		And these criminals have been boasting for a long time.
		James Clapper on CNN, laughing his ass off in 2019, thinking that they like planning the next coup against Donald Trump, openly admitting that it was Barack Obama who hatched all of this and who brought this fake intelligence report to bear by ordering him to do this.
		This is a remarkable clip.
		It'll show you what perhaps will be litigated in court soon.
		Let's go.
james clapper ▲ ● ▼		And certainly those of us that she named, John Brennan and Jim Comey and I are part of the group that were tasked by President Obama to put together all the reporting we had on the Russian interference, which we did.
		President Obama directly and personally confronted Putin about the Russian interference in September and did not accept at face value Putin's protestations.
		John Brennan directly did the same thing with his counterpart.
		On October 7th of 16, we put out a statement.
		Let's say we, Jay Johnson, then Secretary of Homeland Security, and I put out a statement on the 34th right when about warning of the Russian interference in our election.
		This was a month before the election, which unfortunately got drowned out by the access Hollywood tape revelation.
		On December 29th, the administration issued a series of sanctions, PNG'd 35 Russian operatives, closed two Daches, etc.
		And then, of course, on January 6th, we issued our intelligence community assessment documenting the Russian interference, in which we had very high confidence in the evidence that we presented to then President-elect Trump at Trump Tower.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Oh.
		Oh, okay.
		So Obama directed you to do it.
		Got it.
		Well, good.
		I very much look forward to you explaining that as a witness in a court of law.
		Julie Kelly saying Barack Obama will not be prosecuted.
		Well, I don't know.
		I guess President Trump disagrees.
		President Trump's the one posting the AIs of Joe Biden.
		Well, Joe Biden should certainly be part of it, but the AIs of Barack Obama getting thrown in prison.
		And here's the other little thing that I think is very important in all this.
		They've confessed already.
		The documents are helpful.
		A Department of Justice from the Trump administration, prosecutions must be a must happen.
		I cannot emphasize enough.
		Must happen.
		The full faith and credit of the American people are at stake right now.
		If they are able to get away with this, then people will truly blackpill.
		They cannot get away with it.
		My timeline is a constant stream of people blackpilling big creators coming after me and coming after this account and coming after this channel and saying nothing will ever happen.
		Okay, well, it's up to us, isn't it?
		We can muscle our way forward.
		We can throw haymakers.
		We can fight.
		And we can present to you clips like this that they wish were long forgotten.
		I didn't have time to play it with General Flynn, but I'll play it for you now.
		Listen to James Comey admitting that the reason why he targeted Flynn and the reason why he targeted Trump was because they were a nascent and young administration, and he knew that he could commit crimes against them.
		Watch.
james comey ▲ ● ▼		For those administrations, there was process.
		And so if the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work through the White House counsel and there'd be discussions and approvals and who would be there.
		And I thought it's early enough.
		Let's just send a couple guys over.
		And so we placed a call to Flynn, said, hey, we're sending a couple guys over.
		Hope you'll talk to them.
		He said, sure.
		Nobody else was there.
		They interviewed him in a conference room at the White House Situation Room, and he lied to them.
		And that's what he's now pled guilty to.
unidentified		What did he think they were coming over there for?
james comey ▲ ● ▼		I don't think he knew.
james comey ▲ ● ▼		No, We didn't tell him.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		We didn't tell him.
		We lied and we went around the White House council, which they did.
		We took advantage of a brand new administration.
		We destroyed the man who we knew was the enemy of Barack Obama and understood the way the deep state engaged, understood where all the skeletons were and buried.
		That was the power of General Flynn, was he was the only person in Trump's orbit who had risen to the highest ranks of the military and truly understood the nature of the beast here.
		They attacked him, specifically targeted him, and broke every rule and violated every code of conduct.
		It was patently evil.
		General Flynn is our friend, and we're delighted to see perhaps some justice here in our lifetime.
		So we should be praying for that.
		It is an evil, evil regime.
		Just one final thing.
		Let's read the full Stephen Miller tweet because I think he just absolutely encapsulated it perfectly.
		Yeah, full Stephen Miller tweet.
		Stephen Miller has commented on this a single time, and he has said this.
		A seditious conspiracy to overthrow the government of the democracy of the United States.
		There is nothing that the deep state will not do to perpetuate its power over the people.
		Right here.
		Thank you very much.
		The next one, thank you.
		Correction, ladies and gentlemen.
		This is a little more muscular tweet from Stephen Miller.
		Tulsi Gabbard has exposed a startling depths of a seditious coup against the Republic.
		The forces behind this coup have done and what they will do to protect their grasp on illegal and illegitimate power.
		Do not underestimate their capacities or depravities.
		We are stronger.
		We are stronger because we keep truth and light on our side.
		And we don't need to understand everything right now.
		What we do need to do is continue the fight.
		Please join us.
		We do that through logging in with the truth from Hebrews 11, 6.
		But without faith, it is impossible to please him, God.
		He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek him.
		It has been the effort of this show to diligently seek to date on these issues, and to seek out truth, and to push and to muscle and to endeavor to get these results.
		Why?
		Pretty easy for me.
		Save our country.
		Go on the pinned tweet on my profile, please.
		Save our country.
		For whom exactly shall we save our country?
unidentified		Well, look at these little kids.
benny johnson ▲ ● ▼		Right?
		You've already won.
		Something that we say.
		Nike had a viral ad this week with Scotty Schieffer, I think is his name.
		He's a golfer.
		Apparently a very good one.
		I don't watch golf nor do I call sports at all.
		But anyway, it was him with his children.
		So here's me with my kids at the Student Action Summit last weekend.
		You've already won.
		What do we always say about these things?
		Well, we say it every single show.
		Remember, ladies and gentlemen, in the end, we win.
		And this is how you do it.
		And this is what I'm protecting.
		This is what I'm fighting for.
		This is what I wish to leave.
		This will be my legacy.
		To be to save this nation for my children.
		That's why I'm fighting.
		And remember, in the end, we win.
		It's your boy Benny.
unidentified		See ya.
		The baby shows me, bringing liberty to life.
		The speeches to the page, Benny sharp like a blade.
		Coming through the lies, once the truth cascade.
		With the woolly is hard, this man never fades.
		You know it's primetime when Betty invades.
		From saving the nation, the story's untold.
		The benefit shows us dorms, see the truth unfold.
		Stay in the loop, let freedom take hold.
		Sorting all the lips, soul never slows.
		It's the benefit show where the truth gon' be.
		Faith and freedom on the TV screen.
		Stand up strong, battle through the night.
		The benefit shows here, bringing liberty to life.
		Liberty to light.
		Bringing liberty to light.
		Liberty to light.
		Bringing liberty to light.
		From the speeches to the baits, bang it sharp like a blade.
		Cut me through the lies, watch the truth cascade.
		With the warrior's heart, this man never fades.
		You know it's primetime when Benny invades.
		From saving the nation to stories untold.
		The Benny shows a storm, see the truth unfold.
		Stay in the loop, let freedom take hold.
		Salting all the lips, soul never slows.
		If the Benny shows where the truth gon' be, faith and freedom on your TV screen.
		Stand up strong, battle through the night.
		The Benny shows here, bringing liberty to light.
		Bringing liberty to light.

▲