Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 27, 2025 - The Benny Show - Benny Johnson

02:51:41

Trump Speaking LIVE Now On Supreme Court WIN as Communist NYC Mayor Nominee Could Be DEPORTED

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Andrew Cuomo is staying in New York City's mayoral race for now.
	Two sources confirming to Fox that Cuomo will now be running as an independent.
	That's in addition to Mayor Eric Adams, who officially announced his bid for re-election yesterday.
	We're going to lift up the city of New York.
	And so I'm asking you, New Yorkers, to continue to stand with me as we move this city into the market down a little bit.
	The two will face progressive upstart Zoran Momdani, who shocked the political world on Tuesday after winning the Democratic mayoral primary.
	Oh my goodness.
	Oh my goodness.
	Speaking of which, that socialist candidate, he is beginning his media tour by openly touting his radical ideology.
	You're a proud Democratic socialist.
	Do you think that is a platform that would work for other candidates running in other parts of the country?
	Absolutely.
	I think ultimately this is a campaign about inequality.
	So when people say Democratic socialist, do you like capitalism?
	No, I have many critiques of capitalism.
	What I'm focused on is making the city affordable for everyone.
	Fox News contributor and senior writer for The Washington Examiner, Joe Concha, joins me now.
	Joe, what do you make of the Democrat media's reaction to Mamdani and his primary wins so far?
	Well, Todd, you may notice that Mandami's media tour is running to cheerleading outfits like you just showed, MSNBC and CNN.
	It doesn't include any outlet like, I don't know, the one we're on right now, Fox News, that may dare question him about his patently insane policies in terms of asking a very simple question.
	Hey, my dude, how are you going to pay for all of this?
	How are you going to pay for universal free childcare, free busing?
	How are you going to pay for creating city-run food stores?
	Because somebody has to build those places and work at them, right?
	How are you going to pay for government-funded sex changes for minors?
	And by the way, why should New Yorkers flip the bill for that again?
	I mean, he says, Todd, he's going to raise the tax, he's going to raise the corporate tax rate by more than 50% when it's already near the highest in the nation.
	Well, guess what happens if that somehow succeeds in getting passed?
	Any business, any millionaire, billionaire that hasn't left is going to leave the state.
	And they're going to take all that tax revenue with them.
	NYPD officers, by the way, who he wants to replace with social workers in high crime areas, they're also going to leave.
	And that kind of proposal, by the way, is going to get innocent people killed.
	But no matter, CNN, MSNBC, they're going to do everything they can to get this guy elected because he's the ultimate anti-Trump, anti-capitalist who gives a good soundbite and has some charisma, I guess.
	What do we want?
	Communism!
	And when do we want it?
	You want it now!
	Yeah!
	And who should we vote for?
	Me!
	Vote for me!
	Sounds of the game Sounds of the game you Thank you.
	Very good.
	Okay, we got the AI robots now voting in New York.
	We are freshly back from New York City.
	Good morning and welcome back to the Benny Show.
	We did a single day trip, a surgical strike on our own nuclear facility, a nuclear story that we look forward to telling to you today on the program.
	We'll give you a little preview of what we're cooking up right now.
	And I can tell you one interesting nugget off the very top of the dome.
	The president is very interested in what we just did up in New York City.
	A very interesting story.
	We're going to talk about it in just a second.
	Today is Friday, June 27th, 2025.
	This is the last.
	This is our last Friday show in June.
	What a, we are ripped roaring, man.
	This has just been a wild, wild year and a blazing fast news cycle.
	It has been something that we've been trying to capture, energy in a bottle.
	And we appreciate you rolling with us as we cover all of the day's news.
	We try and keep up the pace and the energy.
	And we're proud of our team here for doing that.
	Calls for Democrat New York City mayor nominee to be denaturalized as an American citizen and deported over commie past.
	Very interesting.
	As soon as this scumbag, his name's Zorhan Mandami, as soon as this scumbag was naturalized as an American citizen, he started calling for the destruction of the statues of our founding fathers in this nation.
	This is the kind of filth that we are allowing to become American citizens.
	We were never so reckless as a country.
	We need to tighten it up.
	You can't be allowing insurgents, people who didn't build this place and people who hate this place, to become American citizens.
	It's going to end terribly.
	We have a good example of this, and of course, it's the Roman Empire, but we're getting ahead of ourselves here.
	We're going to talk about that today.
	Also, the Pentagon scorches treasonous media, and Donald Trump outs the leaker of the information that says that we didn't actually destroy any nuclear sites in Iran.
	Yeah, baby.
	CNN changing their tune, and it is a beautiful thing to hear.
	America's Mayor Rudy Giuliani joins the program today live.
	What a booking.
	Come on, it's perfect.
	And Andy Ogles of Tennessee is a congressman.
	He's a congressman calling for the denaturalization of this economy.
	And why would that work?
	Oh, baby, we're going to Cover all of it.
	And it turns out that he has actually a really great case here.
	Here we go.
	My name is Benny Johnson, and this is the Benny Show.
	We just want to say thank you.
	We just want to shout out the crew at YouTube, chat.
	YouTube chat, those watching on YouTube, we broadcast, we stream concurrently, simulcast on multiple platforms.
	We love you no matter where you watch.
	But on YouTube, we just passed 5 million subs.
	And we've been working very, very hard to dominate on that platform and to deliver excellence every single day and every single weekday and every single night and 10 p.m.
	on a Saturday if Trump bombs Iran.
	We are here for you.
	Thank you for showing up for us.
	We won't stop until we've saved the country.
	And then we also won't stop.
	Okay.
	Can't stop, won't stop.
	We just want to say thank you.
	It is really unsightly for a grown man to toot his own horn.
	So we're just going to cut it off there and just say we're just honored to be part of this community with you.
	Shout out to the chat and nothing but absolute love and appreciation for the chat.
	Okay, ladies and gentlemen, I do the heart right here, right in the middle of the chest.
	And I'm glad that I'm able to do that.
	I'm glad my heart's still ticking.
	I do have extremely high blood pressure.
	I do talk about it a little bit.
	This job, probably not the best professional, probably should have been like a gardener or something.
	Probably not the best profession for a high blood pressure job.
	Or maybe it is.
	I'm not sure.
	But we keep the intensity going, but you got to make sure you keep your ticker going too.
	120 Life is how I do it.
	120 Life is a excellent option for you to lower your blood pressure naturally using five natural ingredients blended together in a delicious drink.
	One in two adults have high blood pressure.
	There's a 50-50 chance that you're affected, most likely.
	Heart disease is the most common disease in any family in America.
	So you got to get control of that.
	Ladies and gentlemen, I got a lot to live for.
	Starting with four kids, this beautiful company.
	And our team here.
	Also, you.
	We want to show up for you.
	You show up for us anyway.
	Keep your ticker going and stay healthy.
	This is the season for that.
	It's endorsed by 750 doctors and is trusted by healthcare professionals around the country.
	120 Life.
	You can try it today.
	120 Life, save 20%.
	Just use the code Benny at checkout.
	120Life.com.
	120 Life offers a risk-free trial, free refund.
	If you don't see lower numbers in two weeks, go to 120Life.com and use the code Benny, B-E-N-N-Y.
	Okay, let's freaking go, baby.
	Let's talk a little bit about why we were off the show yesterday.
	I don't like being off the show.
	I like being in my studio.
	As everyone knows, we are, well, we're very efficient in this studio and it's very cozy here.
	There's no windows or doors or anything.
	Well, it's like a little black box, but hey, you know what?
	It gets it done.
	We lock in and we're able to cook here.
	And so when we leave the studio, it better be for a damn good reason.
	And it was for a damn good reason yesterday.
	Here's where we went yesterday.
	We went to AOC's home.
	It's a very unique place.
	You'd say, oh, you went to the Bronx.
	Well, actually, while we did go to the Bronx there for just a little bit, and that place is a rat-infested hellscape.
	I've never seen anything.
	I mean, geez, man.
	Dude, Colton and I were there at the, Colton and I were there yesterday shooting.
	It was like, you know, it's like the third world, man.
	You import the third world, you become the third world.
	Go stand on a corner in the Bronx, South Bronx right now.
	Stand on a corner and look around.
	It is like, it is wild.
	There's like people eating off the streets.
	There's these rats the size of dogs.
	There's, I mean, it's like, it looks like the scene out of like a movie where they're trying to set like a, you know, foreign marketplace in a far-off land.
	People selling and peddling stuff out of sewers.
	Oh, it's disgusting.
	Filth and trash everywhere, just dilapidation, collapse.
	Oh, it's just awful.
	It was awful.
	It made me very sad.
	And this is AOC's district.
	AOC constantly, yap, yap, yap, talks about the Bronx.
	Yap, yap, yap.
	Hey, Alex, can you grab me that tweet?
	I know we, I don't want to do the full thing here, but like, can you grab me that tweet from this week?
	Just this week, AOC, yap, yap, yapping at Donald Trump, saying that a bronze, is that the Bronx killer Klein?
	That's unbelievable.
	Look at this.
	This is similar to what we saw.
	This is very similar.
	This is AOC's district.
	Yo, at least she's on brand, right?
	Like, at least she's on brand.
	She's a communist, right?
	And this is what all communist nations look like.
	Go to Havana.
	Go to Havana.
	It'll look like this.
	It's terrible.
	Show me the cars again.
	Jeez.
	Look at this.
	Yeah, sidewalk couch.
	That's exactly right.
	Look at this.
	Here's the Bronx.
	So anyway, we went there yesterday.
	AOC, yap, yap, yip, yip, yapping.
	Here's AOC chirping at Trump.
	Just this week, and it sent me off a cliff.
	It sent me over the ledge.
	I said, I can't stand it anymore.
	I'm going to go.
	We're going to go.
	I can't stand it.
	We have an excellent team here.
	We were able to lock and load in like four hours and get up to New York and get back.
	AOC saying, I eat Bronx boys for breakfast is what she had.
	There it is.
	Yeah, perfect.
	All right, stolen Bronx valor.
	Because those who know know AOC ran being a Bronx girl.
	She ran against somebody on the pretext that he wasn't from the Bronx.
	There's an old establishment Democrat named Joe Crowley.
	You never heard of him.
	He's just, you know, just one of those machine politicians from New York.
	He was an evil white guy, though.
	You know, an evil, doughy white guy who didn't rep he didn't look like the Bronx.
	You know what I mean?
	Yeah.
	That's her race.
	That's her campaign race.
	We have her old political ads and everything.
	And she says he doesn't live here.
	He doesn't drink our water.
	He doesn't breathe our air.
	Okay.
	AOC then continues to pathologically tell everyone she's a Bronx girl.
	She does it all the time.
	I'm a Bronx girl.
	You know, it's weird.
	And I've always thought it was really weird that an adult does that.
	Like, I don't sit there and tell everybody I'm from Iowa.
	I'm from Iowa.
	Like, I don't, you mentioned it in passing.
	I guess if it's totally relevant to the conversation, like Jim Jordan comes on the show and we talk about like Midwestern stuff.
	Fine.
	This is wild.
	Like, what's wrong with her?
	Why does she keep saying that?
	It seems like a pathology.
	Someone's hiding something.
	It's very strange.
	Adults don't act like that.
	And lo and behold, when you do just a little bit of research, you find out that AOC ain't from the Bronx.
	No, no, no.
	Her gritty, hard scrabble, Bronx girl demeanor was actually created out of whole cloth in a beautiful hamlet called Yorktown Heights.
	A clean, rich, happy, safe suburb 90 minutes away from New York in a leafy upstate territory where you go to do leaf tourism right in the fall and get yourself a coffee and a cookie.
	And that's exactly what we did.
	We went up there yesterday and we're going to tell the story of who AOC actually is and where did she come from.
	Oh man, and we are cooking on something very special.
	There's a chance that it might even be up today.
	We'll see.
	We want to make sure that we have everything locked in here for what we're working on.
	And we want to make sure that it's elite because we have some high-profile individuals that are very interested in us telling this story.
	And it's a part of what we do here.
	And it's just why, again, we want to say on the stream here, like how appreciative we are of you as an audience.
	It's our obligation to go do this.
	It's our obligation to go take you with us and to show these things and to tell the world about it.
	You give us the power to do it just by watching.
	And so we're just deeply appreciative of you.
	Many people support us in other ways, like super chats and stuff, and just all of it.
	I just like, we're just like brimming with gratitude.
	You won't find a channel that is more brimming with gratitude and thankful.
	And so, ladies and gentlemen, we took our leave yesterday, went up to Yorktown Heights, and boy, did we discover some fascinating things about AOC.
	Boy, howdy, wouldn't you know it, where we told some stories?
	Hot diggity dam.
	May have to even return.
	We were on a very tight schedule yesterday, and we were only able to get one man on the street interview back in the Bronx.
	We had to go film there.
	And we were able to get one man on the street interview talking about the mayoral candidate who just won in a landslide.
	We don't say that enough.
	He won in a landslide.
	I mean, I don't know how many rig.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	I mean, they have permanent mail-in battle.
	They have mail-in balloting, right?
	And they have criminal aliens voting, but whatever.
	The guy ran walking away with it.
	So it is what it is.
	Whether it's fraudulent or not, the guy won in a landslide.
	His name's Zoran Mandami.
	Now, Zoran just became an American citizen just a few years ago.
	Started immediately agitating to tear down statues, marching in George Floyd protests, and wanting to burn the country to cinders.
	Now he's running to defund the police.
	He's running as an avowed communist.
	He straight up is going on TV and talking about how much he hates capitalism.
	He's going to raise taxes.
	He's going to fundamentally scar the face of New York City by taking over all the grocery stores and gas stations.
	Did you know that these are some of his policies?
	He's going to have government-run grocery stores in New York City and gas prices.
	They're going to have price fixing.
	Boy, it's like, geez.
	Can you show the Bronx again?
	Can you show like that?
	If you want to know what the end stage is, it's this.
	Like, they're already there, I guess.
	We're going to have a talk about that with America's mayor, Rudy Giuliani, whether we should just let great cities die or not.
	Oh, okay.
	This is a real man.
	Okay.
	Klein has found a real man from the Bronx.
	Thankfully, thankfully, maybe this man, whoever this man is, should run for, maybe he should run for mayor.
	Maybe he should run for A.C. Remember this when Robert De Niro talks tough to Trump.
	Remember, Robert De Niro gets up at the Tonies and goes, F Trump!
	Remember that?
	Remember that he could also be cast as one of the dwarves in the live-action Snow White.
	Just an important reminder.
	Look at those shoes.
	He could be a member of the Lollipop Guild.
	Robert De Niro's next casting.
	Robert De Niro's next casting could be a small child, a small baby, a small baby crying.
	Look at those shoes.
	Look at that.
	I mean, those are some of the tallest buildings in New York right there.
	It is embarrassing.
	Okay, well, ladies and gentlemen, here we go.
	We are looking at a collapse in New York, the likes of which we've never seen.
	Is it good to let our big cities crumble and to let these people get what they want?
	Or should we as Americans have righteous indignation and say, no, damn it, you're not allowed to do that to my city?
	Well, there's something interesting that's happening that's been bubbling up right now, and it is the question about denaturalization of Zohran.
	You know, interestingly enough, there's something in the naturalization papers in America, a little unique artifact, I guess you could say, from a time gone by where we didn't used to like communists in this country.
	Turns out you can't be a member of the Communist Party and become a citizen here in America.
	That's still the rule.
	In fact, it's one of the biggest rules that there is.
	It's right there at the top of your naturalization papers, and there's entire subsections throughout the immigration process detailing how ardently we are not going to allow communists in and detailing exactly explicitly that you must have never had any contact with communism, communist party, organization of communist parties.
	So there is a big question right now out of Andy Ogles of Tennessee, who will be joining the program, suggesting the New York Democrat mayoral candidate, Zoran Mandami, should be deported and denaturalized ahead of the November election.
	Zoron Little Mohammed Mandami.
	Okay.
	Anti-Semitic socialists.
	This just caught me off guard.
	Okay.
	What a timeline we live in.
	Anti-Semitic socialist communists will destroy the great city of New York, Ogles wrote on Thursday.
	Well, is it a great city?
	I don't know, but, you know, whatever.
	The social media posts on X appearing to invoke the Prophet Muhammad.
	He needs to be deported, which is why I'm calling for the subject of denaturalization proceedings.
	The Tennessee lawmaker attached a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, the post urging her to denaturalize Mandami, citing a chapter from the U.S. Code that outlines the revocation of citizenship for individuals who willfully misrepresent or conceal material support for terrorism.
	According to the public reports, including a June 21st, 2025 New York Post article, Mr. Mondami expressed solidarity with individuals convicted of terrorism-related offenses prior to becoming a U.S. citizen.
	Specifically, he rapped, Free the Holy Land five, My Guys, Ogles wrote in a letter.
	The Holy Land Foundation is a U.S.-based Muslim charity.
	Five of its leaders were convicted of funneling money to Hamas in order to kill and commit terrorism.
	I guess Americans, Jews, Christians, you know, pretty much everyone.
	Publicly praising the Foundation's convicted leadership as my guys raises serious concerns about whether Mandami held affiliations and sympathies and failed to disclose during his naturalization process.
	While I understand that some may raise First Amendment concerns about taking legal action based on expressive conduct, such as rap lyrics, speech alone does not preclude accountability where it's reasonably suggested underlying conduct is relevant for eligibility for denaturalization.
	Ogles' comments drew condemnation from some Democrats.
	This type of fascism has never been America, says Sherry Dean Gander.
	Whatever the hell that is.
	House Homeland Security Committee Democrats also hit Ogles with a statement, referring to his comments as racist.
	Hmm.
	We'll let the congressman answer for himself.
	He'll be on the show soon.
	Mondami's campaign team and Justice Department did not immediately respond for a comment.
	New York City mayoral candidate did speak to the weaponization of anti-Semitism throughout his campaign and division during his victories speech.
	Okay.
	So I guess we'll see, ladies and gentlemen.
	Mondami has been subject to a car bomb threat in repeated voicemails on various dates by an unknown individual.
	Okay.
	Well, you know, we want everyone to be safe and so on.
	But it's an interesting question.
	So ALX, this is on the, this is interesting.
	This is on the support for terrorism charge, not the communist charge.
	ALX brought up in a post that went viral that also you're not allowed to be a communist.
	Here we go.
	Membership in certain organizations, a person, subject, revocation, naturalization, if the person becomes a member or affiliated with the Communist Party.
	The totalitarian party, terrorist organization within five years of his or her naturalization.
	Okay, well, here's Mundami just last night saying, I'm like, I'm a communist.
	This was him on CNN, I believe, saying, yo, like, I don't believe in capitalism.
	He's run as an avowed Marxist.
	Now let's listen.
	So when people say democratic socialist, right?
	And I'm curious what you think this means.
	I mean, do you like capitalism?
	No, I have many critiques of capitalism.
	And I think ultimately the definition for me of why I call myself a democratic socialist is the words of Dr. King decades ago.
	He said, call it democracy or call it democratic socialism.
	There must be a better distribution of wealth for all of God's children in this country.
	And that's what I'm focused on is dignity and taking on income inequality.
	And for too long, politicians have pretended that we're spectators to that crisis of affordability.
	We're actually actors, and we have the choice to exacerbate it like Mayor Adams has done, or to respond to it and resolve it, like I'm planning to do.
	So, ladies and gentlemen, he's also calling to tax white neighborhoods.
	Kara, who's the excellent booker on this program, we need to get...
	Let's get...
	Zorhan Mandami proposes taxing white neighborhoods in New York City.
	We need to get the Justice Department Civil Rights Division on this.
	Leo Terrell would be great.
	Like, let's ask, is this allowed?
	You know, are you allowed to do this?
	It's amazing.
	This is going to be super fun to watch from afar.
	Give me this article, boys.
	I need to read this.
	Give me this article.
	Tweet's not enough.
	I need the article.
	What does that mean he's going to tax white neighborhoods more?
	Okay, Zorhan Mondami proposing taxing whiter neighborhoods.
	Let's go ahead and read.
	It really does give you a tinge of South Africa, doesn't it?
	Not just a tinge, like a literally South Africa.
	New York City's Democrat mayoral candidate, Zoran Mondami, has said that he wants to shift the tax burden to richer and whiter neighborhoods.
	This is an exact quote.
	This isn't some type of illusion or alliteration.
	This is a quote from him.
	A housing policy document on Mondami's official website includes a pledge to shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods.
	Newsweek contacts the Mondami campaign by email.
	They wouldn't respond.
	Mondami's proposal has already sparked backlash with conservative commentator Branningham as racist and urging New Yorkers to support incumbent mayor Eric Adams, who is running in November as an independent.
	New York City's mayoral election campaign has already turned bitter with several Republicans suggesting Mondami, a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Uganda, should be stripped of American citizenship and deported.
	Mondami's official campaign website, Policy Membo, titled Supporting Homeowners and Ending Deed Theft, the document says that if elected, his administration will shift the tax burden to richer and wider neighborhoods.
	Is this legal?
	See if we can.
	Reach out.
	I want to find out in the time of this interview.
	I need to find out in the time of this interview.
	Reach out, ladies and gentlemen, to Leo Terrell.
	I want an answer on this, team.
	I want to answer on this.
	Thank you.
	This is the DOJ Civil Rights Division.
	Reach out to Harmee Dillon.
	I want an answer on this, producers.
	Hold on.
	Yeah.
	I'm going to reach out to Harmeet on the show.
	I'm just reading this.
	This is, you should be prosecuted.
	The campaign should be shut down.
	Amen.
	Flip it.
	Flip it.
	I love Florida.
	I live here.
	It's a great state.
	If I ran, you would be perfectly justified to prosecute me if I ran for mayor of Tampa, where we broadcast from, and I said I want to tax blacks more.
	And Latino, there's a huge Cuban population here in Miami.
	By far the number one, like, by population numbers, by percentage numbers, the largest Cuban population actually in Florida here in Miami, here in Tampa.
	If I ran on a policy with taxing them based on their skin color, I should be prosecuted.
	I mean, like, you know, clearly you'd be run out on a rail, but you could have your campaign shut down.
	There's clearly, clearly violations happening right here, the Civil Rights Act.
	So if this is real, he's running an illegal campaign.
	Denationalize him or not.
	Like, I'm not sure.
	I think that seems like a little more of a long shot.
	We're going to talk to Ogles about it.
	Talk to Giuliani about it.
	Giuliani will be on the show.
	But this alone, Alex, are we reaching out to DOJ Civil Rights?
	He's working with Giuliani.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	All right.
	All right.
	I need to know about this.
	This is crazy.
	We did ask.
	We asked the Cuban, mayor of Miami this week.
	His name's Francisco Suarez.
	He's like the Bizarro World.
	Zorhan Mandami is the Bizarro World version of this guy.
	So this is a very successful, very popular Republican mayor of Miami who was on with us in a pre-taped interview that happened two days ago, right when this news broke.
	And this clip went thermonuclear viral.
	I asked him, you know, because this guy had his family hunted and killed by the Castros right in Cuba.
	And that's where he comes from.
	And his family had to escape and flee.
	And like a real refugee.
	There are real refugees.
	There's examples of that.
	And we should take it on a case-by-case basis.
	But this guy had to flee and came to America.
	And I asked him, like, yo, should we allow like these communists to run our biggest cities?
	Should that be allowed?
	It's not allowed in our naturalization process.
	But right now, there's a Marxist, Karen Pass, in charge of L.A. There's a communist in charge of Chicago.
	And now New York.
	They're going for a trifecta.
	Here was his answer.
	It says you're not allowed to have active Communist Party affiliation if you're going to become a naturalized American citizen.
	How do we square this?
	Should communists be allowed to run for office?
	Well, they shouldn't be allowed to be citizens, right?
	They should be naturalized.
	And so they certainly shouldn't be able to run for office because that should be a precondition of being able to run for office.
	You should be a naturalized citizen of the country.
	And so to me, that's, by the way, my favorite part of the naturalization process, right?
	Is this concept that you cannot be an avowed communist to be an American, right?
	So, I mean, I think that's a beautiful thing.
	But I think, you know, communism, what people don't understand is communism is a virus.
	It's insidious.
	The way that communism, the Cubans in particular, were trained by the Russians, by the KGB, right?
	And they were trained as spies and they were trained to manipulate and to be insidious in the way that they penetrate our country and try to infuse this perverted ideology on our cities and our citizens.
	And so for me, you know, when I see this happening on a big scale, in a big city, I get alarmed, which is why I reached out to you, right?
	And I wrote this letter, you know, this op-ed that hopefully will get published in a big publication.
	I want to warn people.
	I really, really, I feel a moral obligation to warn New York about what's coming if they don't take, they still have time, right?
	The election is not till November.
	They have time.
	And I hope they make the right decision because otherwise, look, I understand Miami's going to benefit at some level and we'll have some issues as a result of it at some level.
	But I don't want, I never want to benefit based on somebody else's misery, right?
	And I think that's what I see happening.
	I don't think that you should be allowed to run for office as a communist.
	Can we say that?
	Yes.
	It's antithetical to the nation.
	It's antithetical to our country.
	Do you understand that if you let enough people come in that have ideas that are corrosive to your culture and nation, you won't remain.
	You won't survive.
	You'll become that nation.
	There are plenty of Ugandas out there.
	There are plenty of Zimbabwe out there.
	This is where this guy's from.
	He's from Uganda.
	There are plenty of places like that.
	Total hell holes, total hellscapes that are run by Marxists.
	They're trying to bring that here.
	And if we bring enough of them here, that will happen.
	We talk about this when it comes to what is a place?
	What are our people?
	A place isn't the geographic location.
	Just use an easy example.
	If you bring every Haitian from Haiti, you empty the entire island and you bring every Haitian directly in to the Midwest, which is what they did, which is what the Obama administration, which is what the Biden administration was trying to do.
	And you put them all in Ohio.
	It ceases to be Ohio.
	It becomes Haiti.
	Haiti isn't the geographic location.
	It's not the rock.
	It's not the island in the middle of the ocean.
	The rock in the middle of the ocean.
	That isn't Haiti.
	Haiti is the voodoo and the dysfunction and the low IQ and the crime, the misery, the despicable culture.
	Like all of that bundled together lives within its people.
	And if you bring every Haitian to Ohio, Ohio goes away as you know it.
	And it becomes Haiti.
	You don't have to wonder about this.
	You can go check in.
	In Youngtown, Ohio, they were eating the cats and dogs.
	You can go check in on how little Somalia is doing in Minneapolis.
	It's an insane thing.
	Okay, I just heard back from Harmie Dylan.
	She says that she could draft something right now on it.
	It's cool.
	Great.
	It's wrong.
	The dude's campaign website says I'm going to tax white people more.
	We needed to move the taxes to more white people.
	I'm sure there's plenty of laws.
	Obviously, the Civil Rights Act would be one of them that I could be prosecuted on if I ran for mayor here in Tampa and said, what I'm most excited about is protecting white people from taxes.
	And I'm going to push all the taxes to black people and to Cubans that live here.
	How fast do you think I'd be prosecuted?
	How quickly do you think I'd be shut down and thrown in prison?
	Had my career destroyed, had all my, you know, and rightfully so.
	I would argue that, of course, like that's something that should happen, in fact.
	I wouldn't argue against it.
	Why is it okay?
	It's wild, man.
	Violence is a construct.
	These are really dangerous ideas.
	Violence is a construct.
	There is no such thing as actual violence.
	Everybody just needs to be rehabilitated.
	The cops need to be turned into social workers.
	Listen to this.
	Oftentimes, we've even found as legislators when we go into these courts, the term violent crime is even used when people are stealing packages.
	Violent crime is even used when people are accused of burglary and there happens to be a housing unit in that same dwelling.
	So violence is an artificial construction.
	We have to be very clear to what is happening here with these district attorneys.
	That is violence.
	That is violence of the highest story.
	So we went to New York yesterday.
	Luckily, we were able to find a New York police, New York police officer in the Bronx, in the South Bronx, in a rough neighborhood.
	And we found this cop who walked right up to our cameras.
	And I asked him, you know, are you excited about getting defunded?
	Which tweet is it?
	I want to defund the police because they're not queer enough.
	There's one of his tweets.
	He says, it's time for me to defund the police.
	It's time for us to defund the police.
	He says, queer liberation means defund the police.
	That's perfect, Klein.
	Yeah, this one too.
	We need to defund the police.
	We don't need an investigation that the New York police is racist and anti-queer and a major threat to public safety.
	They're not trans enough.
	Our cops aren't trans enough.
	We need to defund them, he says.
	So I went and asked a New York City cop about this.
	Said, what do you think about that?
	And his response rings like a bell.
	Here we go.
	The primary in New York, the socialist one.
	His name is Zorhan Mondami.
	This guy's mentally disturbed.
	Whoever voted for him is heavily medicated.
	Come on, man.
	We're trying to get things done right.
	He has a famous tweet up that says, the New York City Police Department, we know that they hate gays and queer people and trans people.
	Because he's gay.
	That's why.
	He doesn't want nobody to know that he's gay, so he's being quiet about it.
	A lot of people like to be quiet about their gayness.
	But this guy's probably the biggest gay lord in the five boroughs of the New York City area.
	Gay!
	He said he wants to defund the police.
	You down with that?
	No, man.
	I got 32 years on the job.
	Thank you for your service.
	You know, people like this guy, sometimes we just got to bounce him off our chest and hope for the best, man.
	Because the people that probably voted for him were afraid.
	That's the only way I see it.
	So he says he wants to defund the police.
	Would that be a bad thing for the city of New York?
	It wouldn't be bad, but I don't think that's going to happen because we're too strong.
	You know, he wants my luck.
	But that's the way it works, man.
	We're going to stay here forever, brother.
	NYPD forever.
	I'm going to top that.
	Got him.
	Got him.
	Okay.
	It's perfect.
	It's perfect rap porn material.
	All right.
	All right, ladies and gentlemen.
	Okay.
	So it's an exciting time.
	I want to get to one more thing that has gone viral.
	If you were watching the audience and you were young or old, you probably grew up with Rush Limbaugh on your radio.
	I know I certainly did.
	Did you grow up with Rush Limbaugh booming through your stereo?
	I met Rush just one time, and I got to chill with him backstage.
	We had a great chat.
	And he said, I go walking up to him to shake his hand.
	And he looks me up and down.
	And Rush Limbaugh shakes my hand and he goes, don't tell me that you grew up on family trips driving with me in your car.
	I was like, that's exactly what I was going to tell you.
	Road trips in the 90s with Rush Limbaugh just cracking over the radio.
	That's the way that I grew up.
	It's probably the way that you grew up.
	Rock and roll.
	A mix of Rush Limbaugh and ACDC.
	This damn good upbringing.
	This is one that I missed, ladies and gentlemen.
	Russia's rules for immigration.
	They may sound harsh today, but let me tell you, damn it, this is how, if we had listened to Rush Limbaugh, we would have saved our country.
	Are we too far gone?
	I don't think so.
	I'm not a black pillar.
	But hot damn, did Russia ever nail it here?
	Let's listen.
	Everybody's making immigration proposals these days.
	Let me add mine to the mix.
	Call it the Limbaugh Laws.
	First, you immigrate to our country, you have to speak the native language.
	You have to be a professional or an investor.
	No unskilled workers allowed.
	Also, there'll be no special bilingual programs in the schools with the Limbaugh Laws.
	No special ballots for elections.
	No government business will be conducted in your language.
	Foreigners will not have the right to vote or hold political office.
	If you're in our country, you cannot be a burden to taxpayers.
	You are not entitled to welfare or food stamps or other government goodies.
	You can come if you invest here, an amount equal to 40,000 times a daily minimum wage.
	If not, stay home.
	But if you want to buy land, it'll be restricted.
	No waterfront, for instance.
	And as a foreigner, you have to relinquish individual rights to the property.
	And another thing, you don't have the right to protest.
	You're allowed no demonstrations, no foreign flag waving, no political organizing, no badmouthing our president or his policies.
	You're a foreigner.
	Shut your mouth or get out.
	And if you come here illegally, you're going to jail.
	Now, You think the limbaugh laws are harsh?
	Well, every one of the laws I just mentioned are actual laws of Mexico today.
	That's how the Mexican government handles immigrants to their country.
	Yet Mexicans come here illegally and protest in our streets.
	How do you say double standard in Spanish?
	How about no mas?
	We used to have a proper country.
	Ladies and gentlemen, we used to have a proper country.
	I just want to put a pin in this.
	They post from the potential of the new mayor of America's largest and used to be the most dominant city, the beacon of freedom from the empire state.
	Zorhan, let's see, this was months after becoming a citizen.
	Months.
	After he had become a American citizen, he's ordering the destruction of statues of our founding fathers.
	A statue of Columbus remains in Astoria in defiance of the values of humanity, empathy, and justice that we stand for.
	Sign the petition.
	Attacking a great Italian American, the greatest Italian American perhaps to ever live.
	Ladies and gentlemen, joining me right now is a very great Italian American, still standing, a man who stood for New York and still stands for New York, and who I believe could potentially save this great city.
	please welcome america's mayor rudy giuliani live Rudy, what the hell are you doing?
	What the hell, man?
	What's going on?
	This is crazy.
	I don't even know where to begin.
	I guess the table is yours.
	What's happening in New York?
	Let's just start there.
	Yeah, the worst possible result that I could have imagined when I was leaving the mayoralty and before September 11th.
	So I spent a lot of time thinking about then the idea that I had had eight years, I was term limited.
	I had accomplished more reform, quite honestly, than I thought I could.
	And I found that once you get the reform movement going, it builds on itself.
	Like I thought I'd get about a 50% reduction in crime.
	I got a 70% reduction in crime.
	I thought I'd bring welfare down by a couple hundred thousand.
	I brought it down by 600,000, 500,000 working.
	After a while, they take over.
	The government workers turn from being not motivated to, they're human beings after all.
	And they turn into being very excited about getting people off welfare, getting them jobs.
	So I said, how do I keep this going?
	We're going to go back into a corrupt democratic city as soon as I leave.
	This is before Bloomberg came along.
	So I started a year and a half before what I call institutionalizing what we did.
	We had a Comstat program.
	It measured crime for us in the department.
	It's an ingenious program, won many awards.
	It has worked in four countries and five other states.
	And it's also failed, and I can tell you why.
	But I made it public.
	I went transparent.
	I said, you know, if I put these statistics out every week, the last year I'm in office, they'll get used to it.
	And then they're going to want the next guy to do it.
	And when crime plummets, they'll know about it.
	Well, that finally worked actually, but years later.
	I did the same thing with welfare numbers.
	I put them all out.
	I let myself be, and I was criticized for some things that they said were wrong, but I took it.
	I said, whoever, this will be our insurance.
	And it worked all during Bloomberg, but it worked because we had an honest mayor.
	Bloomberg, ideologically now, is somewhere between, I don't know, center field and left field.
	But when he was mayor, he was right in the center.
	And he was a Republican for half the time, independent, Democrat, kind of like John Lindsey.
	He went off wrong.
	I always say that LaGuardia and I were the only two real Republican mayors in 150 years.
	But the problem is now it's been taken over by the corrupt Democrat Party, started with de Basio, and it's operating the way it's operated in most of its tenure as a corrupt, completely dishonest Democratic city going back to Boss Tweed.
	You get very few honest administrations if you bother to study the history of New York.
	Always.
	They're Republicans, Independents, or what we call reformed Democrats, like Koch.
	Koch had enough.
	He ran against the party.
	That's what you would need now, I would think, a reformed Democrat or a charismatic Republican that knows how to get votes.
	And I'm trying to search between, honestly, what I'm doing, I'm trying to figure out who's the least bad choice that can win or a relatively good choice, let me be fair.
	And I think it's between Adams and Sleewa, between the two of them.
	They can't both be on the ballot.
	That's very, very hard for your ego.
	The only chance we have to save New York is if one guy endorses the other.
	And right now, I'm trying to weigh.
	One of them is a close friend of mine.
	The other has been a friend and an enemy.
	Mayor Adams endorsed me for mayor in 1997 when I won on a landslide.
	When he first became mayor of the city, he attacked me.
	And now he's on my side, sort of.
	But I'll tell you this.
	I was always able to negotiate with Adams.
	Remember, he worked in my police department.
	He was quite close to my police commissioner who just died, Bernie Carrick.
	And Bernie told me, don't worry, I can work with, I'll show you, we can work with Eric.
	Eric's a guy you can work with.
	And within two weeks, Eric was on our side and endorsed me for mayor And was playing a very positive role.
	So I see the good side of him too.
	And I think I know where the fault line is.
	And I don't think he's corrupt.
	I think he's disengaged.
	Koch had the same problem.
	Koch had corruption all around him.
	I largely became mayor because of prosecuting the mafia and prosecuting just about everybody in Koch's administration, but Koch.
	And he didn't know about it.
	He was living in his own world.
	Eric is very much the same thing.
	It's a different world, but he lives in his own world.
	And corruption is there.
	And since he's gotten in trouble, he's done a lot about it.
	A lot of it has.
	So I'm not worried about the corruption part.
	I'm worried about the execution part.
	Who can execute better?
	Curtis knows the streets of the city better than anybody right now, probably better than me, because I'm away for some period of time.
	The question is, can he get elected?
	Because he's coming out of the Republican, he's coming out of the Republican position, which I think went down to 18% of the vote.
	And he also has been typecast.
	We love him, but do we see him as a mayor?
	Or do we see him still as a kid protecting people on the subway, which most people liked and some people thought was vigilante?
	I loved it.
	I embraced Curtis as a kid.
	He was getting attacked by everybody in the city, Koch, the police.
	They're all jealous of him.
	And I was a U.S. attorney, so I had some role in law enforcement.
	And Koch liked me at the time.
	We worked together.
	It was an era in which the federal government and the city government worked totally together.
	And I convinced Koch to lay off him.
	I said, look, the police, it isn't the police's fault.
	It's all the stupid laws you have and the crazy judges you have.
	The cops can't do their job.
	They arrest a drug dealer in the Lower East Side.
	Two hours later, he's back out on the street.
	Everybody on the street thinks your cops are corrupt.
	And it's the Democrat judges that are corrupt, not the cops.
	So we got to put them in and not let them come out.
	And Koch asked me if I had arrest him federally.
	And I did.
	And they didn't.
	And all of a sudden, that was the beginning of the turnaround.
	Then I lost to Dinkins the first time, defeated Dinkins the second time, and then I put it in place for the whole city.
	And that was the beginning of our reduction.
	Adams is capable of doing that, except there's a difference.
	He's got an insane city council.
	The problem here is Mondami could do police defunding.
	He has the votes on the city council to do it.
	Wow.
	Adams has had to stop it.
	And he's never been able to do refunding.
	They already took a billion dollars from the police department.
	Police department got defunded as part of the phony Floyd thing.
	That money has never been put back.
	Adams has tried four times.
	City council kills it.
	State legislature won't help him.
	They're both heavily radicalized, much more so than any other place, but maybe California or like the crazy things you hear Mondami saying, our city council has been saying for three or four years.
	They passed a law that non-citizens can vote, even though the New York Constitution has as a qualification for voting, you have to be a citizen.
	I mean, this is blatantly unconstitutional.
	Here's the rule.
	Here's their law.
	And it took the New York courts three years to declare it unconstitutional.
	They actually had trouble with it.
	I recommended that every judge who had trouble with that should go back to law school for three years and then come back as a judge.
	But that's the position we're in.
	He has to be defeated.
	I generally don't like the exaggerators.
	But if people are telling you, as the Post has in its editorials and the Wall Street Journal in its editorials, this could be the end of the city as we know it.
	We've been at that point a few times.
	This time, the fall is much greater than it would have been then.
	If I had not been elected in 93, the city would have fallen deeply into debt and into crime, not irreparably.
	Somebody could have come along four years later, maybe eight, because what they had in mind was insane and irresponsible, but it still was well within American form of government.
	What they have in mind is to change us.
	They want us to be a communist government.
	I mean, I know people resist that, but they don't bother to read the history of American education going back to the mid-19th century.
	They've been planning this since 1850, and they've accomplished it.
	And now the things that he says, there should almost be a movement to put him in jail for the things that he says.
	And then people who respect the First Amendment and everything say, no, no, don't put him in jail.
	It isn't right.
	He has a right to say that, but they're horrendous.
	But instead, he gets elected.
	It's very frightening to those of us who love the city.
	And then when he said he's going to raise taxes on the rich, there aren't going to be any rich left.
	If he keeps saying it, by the time he gets elected, there won't be any rich left.
	I moved to Florida a year and a half ago.
	I was probably the last neighbor on my block who did.
	I see more New Yorkers in Florida than I do in New York.
	I don't even feel I'm not at home.
	I go out in Palm Beach, walk around, I go to West Palm.
	Then if I really want to see a lot of New Yorkers, I go to Boca.
	Most of my friends I can get together with now instead of getting on the subway, a 20-minute ride.
	And I thought DeSantis was very good when he held the press conference, almost saying, okay, I've got enough of it now.
	I want to see New York survive for the good of Florida, for the good of America.
	So, hey, don't kill it.
	There's a lot of people who are really critical of a number of elements of Mondami and his platforms.
	And these are just things that he said or tribes that he's been a part of, whether it's Hamas or whether it's communist ties.
	But I'd really like to dig down, since you were a federal prosecutor, into something that is directly on his campaign website.
	Now, you say that he should be put in jail.
	No, no, I don't think he should be put in jail, but I think 20 years ago, people would have said that, and all of us responsible people would have had to have said, Oh, you can't put him in jail for that.
	So it sounds like things he should go to jail for, but you should.
	So, and then this is, I think, the probably most cut and dry case, Mr. Mayor.
	On his campaign website, he says, it's time for us to tax white people more.
	And it's a direct quote.
	He says, we're going to move the tax burden into white neighborhoods in New York, into wealthy neighborhoods, and away from presumably brown neighborhoods based on skin color and race.
	Now, this is prima facie legal, of course, based on a number of statutes, federal and local.
	What's your take on this as a former federal prosecutor, Mr. Mayor?
	Yeah, I think under the present Supreme Court decisions, particularly the most recent ones, that's reverse discrimination, particularly under the last decision.
	And if he did it, you could sue him and you'd eventually win five years later.
	It is no different than saying, I'm going to move all the taxes into areas of the city.
	I'm going to move them into black areas because they don't pay as much taxes as the white areas.
	And I want to equalize things.
	Well, that would be unconstitutional.
	You can't just tax black people.
	You can't just tax white people.
	And if you're disproportionately taxing them, you're effectively taxing and not taxing.
	Somewhere near half the city doesn't pay any taxes.
	I don't know if it's over 50.
	When I ran for mayor, I was very concerned that had gotten up to 48% or 46%.
	And I have a thing in my head, a concept, which is you go over 50% and you become a socialist society, whatever you call yourself.
	I should not be working for the government.
	Neither should you.
	We haven't made that choice.
	I want to go work for President Trump.
	I'm working for the government.
	Right now, you and I are working in the private sector.
	The majority of our money should be for us to determine privately, for our families, for ourselves, and some reasonable proportion for the government that we have to support.
	The minute you flip it and you're paying 52% of the government and you're keeping 48% for you and your family, you're now working for the government.
	And when it gets up to 60 and 70, it starts to get absurd.
	You look at the balance of our economy.
	The government controls more of our economy than in some communist countries.
	So we are, we easily could fit the definition right now of a socialist country, which Trump will reverse completely if he gets the big, beautiful tax bill through.
	And, you know, there are bad things about the big, beautiful tax bill, but there are absolutely critical things about it.
	And somebody's got to remember, they should play some of Ronald Reagan's speeches when he got them to accept a tax bill that had similar problems.
	It didn't do everything.
	It just turned us into the best economy for 10 years.
	And Reagan would say, you know, my 8%, my 80% friend is not my 20% enemy.
	And you never pass anything unless you give them something in a democracy.
	We're losing the sense of a democracy, even us Republicans, if we think we can get everything.
	You always have to reserve something for the other guy so that we have a democracy.
	Our views are no more infallible than theirs.
	They may be better.
	We think they're better.
	They seem to work better.
	There may be a time when our views aren't working.
	Society changes and we've got to change them a little.
	But what happens when you get to the far right and the far left is you become so locked into your ideology, you see the world that way.
	You interpret everything that way.
	And we have too many of that.
	We have too many people like that right now that won't find, there's nothing wrong with finding a reasonable place to meet in the middle.
	There is something wrong with giving up your principles.
	And those are two different things.
	One is necessary for lots of people who will never all agree with each other to have a rational organization of some kind.
	And the other is what happens in a society that breaks apart.
	And I am very, very impressed with Trump's second term.
	He's almost a different man.
	You know, I was close enough to saying his first term, he might have been one of our greatest presidents.
	But hard to get over Ronald Reagan for me.
	I worked for him for eight years and he's my hero.
	This one, he's facing bigger problems than Ronald Reagan ever dreamed.
	No, wrong.
	Ronald Reagan dreamed of these problems and it worried him.
	He saw us going there.
	He would not be surprised now if he came back and saw where we were.
	This is what used to keep him up at night.
	And I'll tell you who wouldn't be surprised, Hamilton and Madison and Jefferson.
	They always feared the conspiracy that could occur if too many people became zealous, too many people were poorly educated.
	It's the educated in our society that are the bigger problem than the uneducated.
	People wonder why, because a lot of the ones who were educated were educated to be Marxists, nihilists.
	They've been educated to hate America and destroy America.
	And that's why it's weird that you have them very often supporting these crazy ideas.
	And you have the working people who have to be practical saying, what do you mean?
	Government grocery stores?
	Eventually, the only thing we'll be able to buy is spam.
	That's how it breaks down, actually, along the lines.
	The lower to middle classes were voting for Cuomo, vote for Adams, and the upper classes, the Wall Street and the very rich neighborhoods, were voting for Mondami.
	So it truly is champagne socialism.
	It's egalitarian Marxism.
	It is.
	It is.
	It's hard sometimes To see the basis of that until you fully accept the fact that our public school system, in large measure, has been completely infiltrated.
	And it's a public school system that right now is working more for China than for America.
	It's training our kids to be Marxists.
	I mean, you take a poll of our kids and they think socialism is fine, like Tampon Tim does.
	So look, yeah, I mean, I'd like to broaden maybe our net for just a moment to the Marxist and or like small or large city communist mayors of Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Chicago, some of our great American cities, now potentially New York having a avowed communist mayor.
	He was on CNN last night.
	Mandami was on CNN last night saying he hates capitalism.
	He's not a capitalist.
	He doesn't like capitalism.
	And so they're not ashamed of this at all.
	Should a communist be allowed to run for office here in America?
	They're not allowed to be naturalized citizens, Mr. Mayor.
	That's in the naturalization documents, I'm sure you know.
	You can't be a member of the Communist Party and be a naturalized citizen in this country.
	I think you could make an argument that, no, they shouldn't because they want to annihilate the government, and we should not be induced to vote for our annihilation.
	But I don't think it would pass a present Supreme Court definition of free speech.
	I don't think we could accomplish that.
	And you know, the Communist Party in our country way back was benign enough that it almost was an American party.
	It was the card-carrying communists that belonged to the cells that were the dangerous ones.
	And unfortunately, and I know a lot of people go crazy when I say this, but I know this for a fact.
	The Roosevelt administration, going back to Wilson, the Democratic Party got infiltrated by them.
	They never infiltrated the Republican Party.
	They wouldn't be comfortable.
	In the Republican Party, you wouldn't be comfortable saying, do away with the free market, because that's the core of our belief.
	And they go along with each other.
	If you don't have economic freedom, ultimately you don't have political freedom.
	The reality is we thought China would split that way.
	We thought China was becoming a capitalist country.
	And as a result of that, there'd be political freedom.
	There's less political freedom in China now than there was 20 years ago.
	Xi Jinming is going back to Mao because he has always said it, if you read him carefully.
	The reason I know what I'm telling you, Xi Jinming wrote that 15 years ago.
	You can't have a split between the two.
	You either have communism or you don't.
	Communism is political and economic.
	You talk about infiltration and communist infiltration.
	It seems like a really stark warning to New York that at the very least you have a candidate here who's played footsie with Hamas, according to his commentary.
	He's saying and rapped about supporting of five individuals who were criminally charged for sending money to Hamas, a terrorist organization.
	You know, he himself is a Muslim.
	And I think there's a lot of people in New York saying, you know, what the hell is happening to my, you know, my city?
	In just a few short decades, we are here now at the, you know, here at the precipice.
	You went viral, of course, Mr. Mayor, this week with just photos of you side by side of you in Mundami on the morning of September 11th.
	Here's one example.
	You know, some of the famous photos of you walking through the streets, you know, taking charge, of course, after this terrorist attack, and just people saying, what the hell's, you know, what's happened to this city?
	It does seem like alarming.
	And there are now members of Congress, one of them will be joining the show, Andy Ogles, who's saying perhaps we should denaturalize him or at least do an investigation into this because he lied and he has ties to terrorist organizations.
	Your thoughts on this, Mr. Mayor?
	No, I think that's a very responsible request and something government should do.
	Given the nature of the things that he says, I don't know that we can come to the conclusion or convict him of it, but he raises a real legitimate concern that he's not a loyal American and that he is working.
	The degree of his involvement in the things that Hamas believes about or believes and the activities he engages in that are pro-Hamas, anti-American, and anti-Israel, to the extent of carrying their flag and burning ours, would suggest there's something deeper to it.
	And that is that there is certainly enough that he's done and said that would justify an FBI investigation that he's a traitor.
	Therefore, you'd want to know what kind of connection is there.
	I mean, I did a lot of these investigations in the Soviet era.
	A guy would come out and start saying all the professors at the Ivy League schools, even back then, were pro-Russia.
	But you'd look at the ones that spent a lot of time traveling there.
	You'd look at the ones that had come back and they'd go over the top and attacking America.
	And they were subjected to FBI investigations.
	Of course, Hoover got attacked for it, but they wanted to take us over.
	And they had a weapon that could destroy us.
	He was doing the responsible thing.
	And a lot of them weren't eventually put under investigation.
	But the fact that we investigated them got us an unbelievable amount of intelligence.
	And right now, we are seriously lacking intelligence.
	I am so worried about the people who did what I used to do.
	The way I look at it, I had about 90% more intelligence than they did.
	We have, it wouldn't be an exaggeration to say we have anywhere from three to six million bad actors in this country, many of which are terrorists.
	And in fact, nobody can contradict that because nobody knows how many we have and nobody knows who came in.
	Most of those people were not identified.
	The ones who were identified are a small minority.
	Even the ones we checked in, we never were able to check their background because Venezuela won't tell us, China won't tell us.
	Most of the African countries don't tell us.
	So the guy comes in and you say, are you a criminal?
	No.
	Are you a terrorist?
	No.
	How do I know?
	I call up Venezuela and they don't answer the phone.
	Maybe every once in a while we have our own criminal records, but those are sparse.
	They're not the kinds of things I would be used to.
	I did an awful lot of those checks and 90% of them worked.
	The 10% that didn't work, we didn't let them in.
	The burden was on you to show us that you weren't a criminal, not the other way around.
	See, there's no right to come into the United States.
	It's a privilege.
	And since the whole world can't come in, the only way to fairly distribute that among the people of the world are the ones that can most easily fit in and make us better.
	Since we can't pick everybody, we have to have some kind of rational basis for deciding who comes in, not any crazy person that wants to walk in the door.
	And the best thing for us would be people who are responsible people that want to work and that at least on a basic level accept the American value system.
	Because if you bring in too many of the other kind, they're going to overthrow our government.
	No government would do that.
	No government does do that.
	They're not going to let you into a communist government unless you're going to accept communism.
	So that brings up a perfect point.
	I'm not trying to trigger you, Mr. Mayor.
	I know that you are one of the proudest Italians living today.
	But he says, Zorhan Mandami, just minutes, Mr. Mayor, after becoming a naturalized American citizen, he's advocating for Columbus statues to be torn down in Astoria.
	We have the statements right here.
	This is kind of like the entitlement, the narcissism, the entitlement, the smugness of these brats to come into this country where they're a guest.
	They're born in Uganda.
	They're living here as a guest, and then to sit here and agitate against our founding fathers to tear down their statues.
	I mean, I just want to, the table's yours.
	You probably have.
	Well, I mean, as an Italian.
	You have harsher feelings than I would even on this.
	No, no, no.
	I would say I have to, I try to, I try to separate my feelings.
	My feelings that an Italian-American are extremely strong and extremely hurt.
	And I was very, very proud a couple of years ago that the Italian-American community would not allow them to take down the statue of Columbus and Columbus Circle.
	That's still in jeopardy.
	They're still going after that.
	I think the new history on Columbus is all a matter of political prejudice.
	Honestly, we don't know enough about Columbus's history or background to make those.
	We have no idea what he really did.
	We do know the obvious achievements.
	The obvious achievement was he was the first one to make it clear that the world was round.
	Whether he was the first one to discover that or not, we don't know.
	But the first one to make it clear is a very, very important person.
	It might have taken us another 200 years and we'd be set back.
	And the man was a man of incredible courage.
	I don't know.
	I'd like to see these people go across the ocean five times with a group of, with a crew, half of which were probably criminals, and then come into an environment.
	Now, we talk about the native population.
	Remember, half of them were violent as hell.
	So you come in and they chop your head off.
	How do you react?
	This is 600 years ago.
	You fight back.
	If they were the people that didn't fight back, they never would have settled America.
	It's like I say about my firefighters.
	When I was mayor, every once in a while, my firefighters would get into a fight in a bar, and they wanted me to fire them.
	I said, if I fired all the firefighters, they got fighting the bar, and I took the ones that wouldn't get into a fight, nobody would come and save you.
	That's right.
	Give me the firefighter who's throwing haymakers.
	That's the guy I want busting through the wall.
	Yes, I need a door kicker, right, to come save me.
	Yeah, I mean, they're not all like that.
	And please, there are a lot of them that are very intellectual.
	They get PhDs and whatever.
	But by and large, they have to have a, they got to be tough.
	They got to be tough people.
	They can't be these, you know, sissy left-wingers because they're not going to come and save you in a fire.
	So the same thing is true here of these people that do these extraordinary things.
	They are going to have quirks and they are going to have problems in their personality.
	And I'm not going to go through it, but I could take apart some of the people they have statues to where we know what they were doing was shocking.
	But we put up statues of them because there are some things they did that were great.
	I mean, and it's ridiculous five, six, 700 years later to go speculate on what he did and why he did it.
	He was very difficult on the crew.
	How many of the people on that crew had murdered somebody?
	How many of the people on that crew were criminals?
	Who do you think became the crew of a ship where you didn't know you were coming back and living?
	It wasn't, you know, the entitled in society.
	He had a tough group of guys he had to take care of.
	So speaking of the people who take care of tough guys in the city of New York, a constant target of Zorhan Mandami was the NYPD and is the NYPD.
	He still has all of his tweets up.
	We can put them up here, but perhaps you've seen them, perhaps not.
	Oh, I have.
	Every single one, and probably words I can't repeat.
	Sure.
	Well, you've got to understand.
	This one says the NYPD is racist, anti-queer, anti-trans, and is a major threat to public safety.
	They have to be defunded.
	No fake Cuts.
	This one says, Mr. Mayor, queer liberation means defund the police.
	What would it mean to have this guy as mayor of New York?
	It means that he said enough to indicate that he has criminal motivations.
	If you took away the NYPD, you would directly get people killed.
	If you don't know that, you're too stupid to walk across the street, much less be mayor.
	If you do know that, you've got a motivation.
	We better find out what it is, because it's not the normal motivation of a candidate for public office.
	So it could be twofold.
	One could be he's an exploiter and he'll take advantage of anything, even if it means we can have a society where people kill each other.
	And the other is that he's a deliberate communist who's been put here to try to complete what de Basio began, or in the case of the Democrats, complete what Obama began.
	When I say communist, it's Obama was trained as a communist.
	We just ignored that.
	Obama acted like a communist.
	He wanted to take our healthcare system and make it socialized medicine.
	You know, 10 years ago, 20 years ago, if he'd been talking about socialized medicine, we would have said, oh, was he a communist?
	Well, that was the same question when he was doing it.
	He just was not.
	In many ways, Obama is exaggerated in terms of effectiveness and intellect and energy.
	He was basically a lazy guy.
	And the left was a little angry at him, not having accomplished as much as they thought he could.
	Kind of liked Biden better, because he was lazier, but he was nothing.
	So he was a cipher.
	You just go right through him.
	Whoever that committee was that ran the government would be similar to the Politburo in old Russia or present China.
	They were running things and they were pure out and out lefties to a point that I don't think Biden, when he was able to think, would have been that bad.
	But that was a better choice for them.
	I mean, they decided better to have a cipher than a guy like Obama, who can be a little bit lazy, doesn't follow through, and also had some degree of a filter.
	He had a sense of maybe he can go too far.
	So Biden had no filter.
	His filter were the people around him.
	And right now, we're not even sure exactly.
	You and I can make guesses on who they are, but we don't know yet and what their philosophies were.
	And I think they were hoping, I think they kind of settled on the idea, although maybe Kamala Harris would have been the same, but in some ways she seemed more stubbornly stupid.
	And therefore, she could have get herselves into some kind of idea pattern that would resist them.
	Biden wasn't capable of that.
	I can't imagine that Biden in his somewhat rational years would have passed the relief for student loans only because in his rational years he articulated that it was directly unconstitutional.
	And then he did it.
	Supreme Court said it was unconstitutional.
	Then he did it again.
	I don't think a Biden, no matter how stupid he was, would have done something like that.
	He understood the government enough and how far you could go and that you'd never be able to criticize the Republicans for that if you did that.
	So they had total control over him.
	And I think this review of who ran the government for that period of time is important to our history.
	And not just our history, our ability to figure out how to work our way out of it.
	I mean, you need to know when something very bad is put together, you need to know how it's put together to take it apart.
	Look at that leak on the attack on Ford.
	That leak indicates that we have communist and Biden people right in the administration.
	A person of goodwill would never have leaked that.
	First of all, it's of low confidence.
	Why would you put out anything of low confidence?
	If they gave me something of low confidence, I'd say, well, that means we don't know if it's true or not.
	We're not going to put it out as the government.
	The minute we put that out, if we understand and we're realistic about modern society, the New York Times and the Washington Post will make it gospel truth.
	And what they're telling us is it's of low confidence.
	And then at the end, they say it's also of low confidence.
	They may have had a complete destruction.
	So this report just told me nothing.
	It's a report that I'd throw in the garbage and say, okay, come back to me in two weeks.
	Instead, they take it and they generate it as the net world headlines, knowing if something is low confidence, it is probably not true.
	When would newspapers have ever done that 30 or 40 years ago?
	They'd have felt guilty doing that.
	And then who leaks that?
	What motive is there for the good of America to leak a low confidence report?
	If it's a high confidence report and it shows something bad, maybe there's a reason to leak it, although I still think you got to follow the laws.
	The only people who leak that are people with bad motives.
	People that they heard Trump say it was a great success, and they're doing what Eric Shiarella did when he wrote the phony letter about the Ukraine conversation.
	And he's the guy who did it, as far as I can tell.
	Mr. Mayor, we have a very interesting post here from Zorhan Mandami.
	The last one I'll show you, but it's one where he says that New York City, he explicitly says New York City needs a communist mayor.
	He says, listen, what kind of a mayor does New York City need?
	We need a communist one.
	Here it is.
	My question to you is this.
	And since they're just out with this, since he's just being explicit about it and rubbing it in our faces, right?
	This is the post.
	These are his words.
	When somebody tells you they don't believe them, do you think that, do you think, I mean, you've alluded to this, but do you think that this is an operation in order to bring some type of horrible tragedy visited upon the city of New York, to use it as like a beacon, that New York is a beacon of American empire and strength, and to like to either plunder it into abject crime, misery, decay, and destruction, or to lay the groundwork for another horrible terrorist attack on the city.
	Well, don't I have to say, I'm going to put myself in the position of when I was mayor, where I had to make choices for the protection of the city.
	First thing you have to do, and you know, to the extent that I've ever lectured mayors on how to be mayor, I would say you always have to take the worst possible scenario.
	Because if it isn't correct, then you haven't wasted any time and you've probably improved your efforts to guide things.
	The guy is inviting an invitation for that.
	In other words, I don't know how serious that is, but I do know if that is serious, that's treason.
	If it's serious, and it needs to overthrow the American government.
	If you've read Marx, if you've if he is his statement, this statement is treason, Mr. Mayor.
	Sorry to interrupt you.
	I just want to nail down.
	This statement is treasonous.
	This statement is treason if it's a serious statement from a well-educated man.
	And those two things have to be investigated.
	Was he throwing this out as political rhetoric, or is there something behind this?
	Here's what it does at a minimum.
	It invites the necessity for an investigation, not to interfere in the election or anything else, but to protect your city.
	Those are the things that are said by somebody who's going to attack your city.
	And those are the things that were said by people who just spout off and say stupid things.
	I was there when Ronald Reagan was shot.
	I handled the Hinckley case.
	And from the time that Ronald Reagan was shot, we treated the threat on the president's statute differently.
	We took it more seriously, spent up a lot of resources.
	But if you said, I'm going to kill the president, even if you were pretty much not really serious, we still investigated you.
	And we figured it did two things.
	One, it got us the person that later on, which we're not getting now, says something like that and we ignore.
	Number two, it stops them from saying it if they're being ridiculous.
	It wakes them up and grows them up.
	And you can't run around saying you're going to kill the president without consequences, but we don't put you in jail.
	So there's a value to, can I give you one other thing off the point?
	It's the Ashley Babbitt murder.
	The Ashley Babbitt murder is crying out for a serious first degree homicide investigation.
	I didn't say there was first degree homicide.
	I said there is overwhelming probable cause to investigate, which we have criminally ignored.
	And we've done that throughout the Biden administration, which is why we don't have a system of justice.
	So yes, what he said should be investigated.
	It may turn out he's just a big political big mouth, and he's looking for the most ridiculous thing he can say to get support.
	Fine.
	But it'll turn out that he's had contacts for years, and this is deliberate.
	But we should know that before we put him in a position of being in charge of America's most serious, biggest city, saying the things he said.
	I mean, what's the communist, the major communist ideology today is in Red China.
	They lead the communist movement.
	It used to be Russia.
	What's China's goal to overthrow us by 2048?
	When he says communism, is that what he means?
	Or does he mean something else?
	Are we going to take for granted he doesn't mean that?
	We can take for granted he means some kind of just general definition of communism or he's like Tampon Tim, one man's socialism is another man's freedom.
	In fact, Tampon Tim should have been investigated.
	30 trips to China, teaching there, paid by them.
	That has all the earmarks of the people I used to investigate for being Russian and Chinese agents.
	Some of them didn't have all those earmarks.
	It could be true that there's nothing to it.
	But it says something about our society that we don't take that seriously.
	It's like we don't want to protect ourselves.
	I mean, it does seem like an assisted suicide in the city of New York.
	And you've already alluded to how many people have left and fled New York City.
	Do you believe that there's going to be a mass exodus if he's elected?
	I mean, do you believe that city mass layoffs, is there going to be like a total liquidation in the city?
	Talk to the real estate agents in New York the day of his day after his nomination.
	Wow.
	They couldn't answer the phones.
	Wow.
	I have a verge of, I'm on the verge of signing of actually closing.
	I already have a contract.
	And I'm saying to myself, well, thank God it's over because I don't know what would happen.
	And look, I love the city and I would have stayed if I thought I could do something.
	But to them, the ideas that I have are so way out, so insane.
	I mean, when I was mayor, they used to call me Hitler.
	Of course, I paid no attention to it.
	I mean, I've been called a racist so long.
	I realize they're pointing out that I'm one of the few that really is completely non-racist because I think people should be judged by their skin, not one particular skin color.
	And that's the way I've applied it throughout.
	I also am very, very proud of the fact that I saved more black lives than any mayor in history.
	You can't find a mayor of a city that came into office and X number of black people were dying.
	And went out of office, it's down by thousands and thousands and thousands because of the crime and welfare programs that I put in.
	And that's been written by people other than me.
	And that drives them nuts when I say that.
	Here you got a right-wing conservative.
	And over my lifetime, I am a perfect example of Churchill and Reagan, who both said, when you're 20, if you're not a liberal, you have no heart.
	And by 40, if not a conservative, you have no brain.
	So my brain got better and I became more conservative.
	mr mayor just really quickly we have some breaking news and then president trump's going to be doing a press conference and oh you got to look forward to those Has anybody ever explained themselves whether he you know why he's doing things.
	You can even disagree with him sometimes and say, no, no, boss, that isn't the right reason.
	And then he usually corrects it.
	So here's the deputy attorney general, position I know you know well at the Department of Justice, has just exclusively gotten back with our program.
	Her name is Harmeet Dillon.
	I'm sure you know her.
	She's a wonderful lawyer.
	Very well.
	And Harmeet has given us an exclusive statement on something that you just spoke about.
	We started off by talking about Zorhan Mondami's plan to tax white New Yorkers more than other New Yorkers.
	And she said to us in this statement, read first live on the show, racial discrimination is illegal in the United States, period, full stop.
	Illegal and discriminatory scheme described by Mondami would violate federal, constitutional, and statutory norms and might violate New York law.
	I just want to get your response as a prosecutor.
	Couldn't have said it better.
	First of all, she's a great lawyer, not just a good lawyer.
	I know her for a long time.
	This is a great appointment to a division that used to report to me when I was Associate Deputy Attorney General.
	The criminal part of it did, and I have great respect for it.
	It's got a great history.
	That's the division that integrated the schools starting under Eisenhower.
	The first one to use troops to get the black kids into the segregated schools was Eisenhower.
	Then Kennedy followed up on it.
	So they love to show the Kennedy thing, but they never show the Eisenhower thing.
	And my eventual boss was the head of the Civil Rights Division when that happened.
	She is in that tradition.
	That, although not noted by many, that's a great appointment.
	She's a great lawyer, and she has the capacity of really turning that whole thing around.
	I assume that you would agree here, Mr. Mayor.
	I over agree.
	Final question.
	And ladies and gentlemen, this is a press conference.
	Let's just put it up real quickly here.
	This is the White House press briefing room.
	Right now, President Trump will be out momentarily as President Trump doing a victory lap, a massive win at the Supreme Court on birthright citizenship is what President Trump is going to go out into the press briefing room.
	This is a very rare occurrence and talk about.
	So ladies and gentlemen, that's what Donald Trump is going to talk about.
	President Trump here on Truth Social.
	Giant win at the United States Supreme Court.
	Birthright citizenship hoax has been hit hard.
	And so he's going to be doing a press conference with Pam Bondi.
	All right.
	Ladies and gentlemen, we'll be covering that in a moment.
	Final question to you, Mr. Mayor.
	Has Eric Adams asked for your support?
	Has he called you?
	Has he begged for your support?
	No, he has not begged.
	I don't know if he asked for my support or I told him I was going to consider it.
	I have to make a choice between him and Curtis.
	And he knows that because he knows I'm very close to Curtis.
	And I campaigned for Curtis against him last time.
	But we have had talks about my telling him that how necessary I think he might be the, I mean, I've been straight with him.
	I don't know which one's better.
	But you're in the category of I will, this has nothing to do with Republican, Democrat.
	The choice I have to make, using all the experience I've had in politics, is which is the better choice to win?
	Because the main thing is we have to stop Mondami.
	And it may be that the other one might be a better mayor in an ideal circumstance.
	But the guy who can win is the guy we got to nominate.
	And he'll be good enough.
	Adams has shown me in the last two years that if he gets the right support, he'll do the right thing.
	You should know that crime is down in New York right now.
	He's got the right police commissioner.
	She's a good police commissioner.
	And she knows what she's doing.
	She's using all the fundamental programs, which if she's more comfortable as a Democrat, she can stay at Bloomberg's.
	But the one who initiated them was Giuliani and Bratton.
	And she does quality of life.
	She is actually using Comstat.
	They were kind of ignoring it.
	She's doing a good job.
	And that's an area where he knows how to do a good job if you don't get in his way.
	I mean, right from the beginning, he wanted the DA removed.
	He wanted the Cuomo passed a law, the effect of which right now in 2019, 42 cop killers are walking the streets of New York who were paroled.
	People we didn't give the death penalty to because we said being in prison for the rest of your life is worse than the death penalty, which is of course absurd when you see how many people have the death penalty and they spend $10 million trying to avoid the death penalty and spend the rest of their life in prison.
	Except the rest of their life in prison is a Democrat fiction.
	42 cop killers are walking the streets of New York due to the Democrat Party.
	So both Adams and Sleewer could handle that.
	So we've got to figure out, is it more likely that the Sleewa supporters had moved to Adams or that the Adams supporters had moved to Curtis?
	I think that's the key fact.
	Right now, I don't have the answer to that.
	There are ways of getting it, and I hope we pursue that in an intelligent way because we don't have room for an error here.
	Yes.
	All right.
	Well, I guess we'll see.
	Maybe the last person left in New York will be Hillary Clinton, her and Bill.
	And they can live inside there.
	And they can live inside of their little bubble.
	That's great.
	You know?
	And go to their shows.
	Hillary can fall into her meatlocker van day and night.
	Mr. Mayor, you were there that day.
	What the hell happened?
	I predicted it.
	I wasn't only there that day.
	I kept him there long enough so he'd be there when it happened.
	I predicted it.
	Really?
	I even recommended that he go because I thought she wouldn't be able to make it.
	I had been at four or five of those with her over the years, and she would always leave early and she always looked shaky.
	And she was starting to talk funny for the last two weeks of the campaign.
	And I said, boss, you know, why don't you come?
	And he said, well, I'll come, but I have to leave early.
	I said, just do me a favor.
	Just one time.
	Leave when I tell you to.
	Just hang on.
	So two hours went by and she looked fine.
	And he came up to me, he said, you know, I said, give us 15 more minutes.
	And I got my fingers crossed.
	And my head of security, John Huvain, was standing right where that, the same angle you have here.
	And he took a picture of it.
	And he ran up to me and he said, tell the boss not to leave.
	And it wasn't John Huvain, it was Bo Wagner or John, both of them together.
	And I said, boss, she just fell down going into the van.
	And we have word already, because the cops were ratting on her like crazy.
	They hated her.
	She's not going to the hospital.
	He said, why wouldn't she go to the hospital?
	Because she doesn't want anybody to take a look at this.
	She's going to her daughter's apartment so they could get a phony doctor to come in and say, oh, she's okay.
	The people here, they don't care if they kill you.
	It's all about them anyway.
	And nobody had any loyalty to Hillary.
	I'm not sure Bill voted for it.
	Oh, man.
	Yeah, you talk about how a death sentence is better than life in prison.
	I don't even know if there's a worse sentence for Bill Clinton after all this stuff that he's done than living with Hillary.
	I think that might be the worst life sentence there is.
	You know, the first one to tell me that was Dick Morris.
	One time I told Dick Morris way back, I said, you know, I've been pretty tolerant on all this Clinton stuff because I don't like judging people.
	But this thing with an intern and in the Oval Office, that kind of, he looked at me and he said, you shouldn't speak unless you have to wake up every morning and see Hillary Clinton.
	So you knew she was going to fall into the van.
	I'm going to say Dick, I think Dick would stand up for that one now.
	I consider that one of his better lines.
	And he has no love loss between those two.
	That's a wild story.
	I'm so glad I asked, Mr. Mayor.
	You knew Hillary was going to fall down because she couldn't stand out in the heat.
	I did.
	Honest truth, I knew she was going to fall down.
	And the minute she selected that event, which I've been at every year but one, I know that event and I know how hot it gets and how difficult it is to stand for that period of time still and how she used to complain like hell about it because I could hear, I could hear her in the background cursing at her people.
	And they were saying, you got to stay longer.
	You got to stay longer.
	It's not going to look good.
	So I, and, and in that period of time, we were noting, the staff were noting to me, the people who followed her around, she's looking wobbly.
	One of them told me a story where they thought she was going to fall into, she got so close to the, she got so close to the people on the stage that it looked like she lost a little of her equilibrium.
	Now, you never know if these are true or not, but why not test them?
	It is a campaign.
	I mean, it is.
	And I've been involved in so many, I mean, four presidential campaigns and three mayoral campaigns.
	And then in 2010, I participated in 50 congressional campaigns when we took Pelosi out.
	That was satisfying.
	I thought she was gone, man.
	I thought she was gone.
	And then she comes back like the monster from the monster movie where the hand keeps coming up.
	It's like a vampire movie.
	Boy, she's looking like a vampire these days.
	That's another podcast, Mr. Mayor.
	That's another topic.
	I tell you, I'm glad I asked.
	I had no idea that you were behind that.
	Man, what a masterstroke.
	I'm glad she knew.
	I was referred to as doctor for a while after that.
	It was just dehydration.
	Was it really just dehydration or was there something like really mental health?
	I think it was, you know, she's not in the best of shape.
	And the heat was brutal.
	It was brutal.
	I mean, one of us could have gone down.
	But I do think she was sick too.
	I think she had some kind of an infection because it had been observable for about a week.
	And, you know, we had our own people observing her because you never get a truthful explanation from the press.
	And movie shots or TV shots don't tell you everything.
	So we always had people following her.
	They had people following us.
	You want to see your opponent personally so you can make the determination of what kind of shape they're in.
	Because campaigns lie.
	Yeah.
	Man, getting, I mean, that was a doozy getting thrown into the meatlocker like that.
	Their shoes falling off and everything.
	Goodness.
	All right.
	I got that approved by Bannon.
	Bannon loved it.
	And some of the best ideas with Bannon, like bringing all the Clinton mistresses to the debate right after the Billy Bush thing.
	I walked two of them in.
	Steve gave me the honor of, he said, nobody, aren't too many that have the courage to walk them in.
	Why don't you walk them in?
	So I had two of them on my arm like this.
	And then Bill walks in and seized them.
	His first thought, I swear to God, was, I'm going that way.
	Let's do a whole other thing.
	Let's do a whole other interview on these stories, Mr. Mayor.
	I'll come to Palm Beach and we'll sit and we'll.
	That was a great campaign, by the way.
	The people in that campaign pulled off incredibly good things.
	They were very smart political people.
	Yes, let's go.
	We'll light up some cigars and we'll...
	They know him as an intellectual and a right-wing, thoughtful person.
	They don't realize he's a very, very strong political operative.
	You know, he's got a lot of the old Roger Ailes talents.
	Yes, he's a genius.
	That's right.
	Mr. Mayor, you're an absolute legend.
	We're so thankful for you and for your people.
	And we need to do that.
	We need to make up for, and we're starting to do it as a group, of which you're a key part.
	We may reach more people as a group, if you define us a little broadly.
	Standing on the shoulders of giants, it's always our honor, Mr. Mayor, with nearly 2 million followers right here on X. And also the Rudy Giuliani show that is available for you to watch every single week at 7 p.m.
	We thank you so very much, Mr. Mayor, for being on with us.
	And I have a feeling this is going to make a lot of news.
	So thank you.
	I hope so.
	Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
	Thank you.
	Godspeed.
	I respect you tremendously.
	Godspeed.
	Ta-da.
	Ta-da.
	you you you We apologize, ladies and gentlemen.
	We apologize to the mayor.
	We didn't know that he was done speaking.
	And we, yeah, it was just a second delay.
	But anyway, nothing but absolute love for Rudy.
	Ladies and gentlemen, big time-breaking news cycle right now.
	We are going to enter it.
	We are entering the Thunderdome and the vortex.
	President Trump will be live on the program.
	He'll be live at a press conference here momentarily.
	You can see the room is already stacked and filled.
	Donald Trump rarely making a visit to the actual press pool.
	It's called a pool because it used to be the White House pool.
	So that's why they call it a pool report.
	It's weird.
	It also is kind of like a pool.
	It's like dank and weird smelling and stuff.
	Anyway, that room.
	Donald Trump will be live there.
	This is a live shot right now, and we'll be taking it live.
	Wherever you are, Patrio Mobile will travel with you.
	Patrio Mobile can be your cell phone service that connects you and keeps you locked and loaded on the road, just like it does for us.
	It was the backbone of our company, and the connectivity of this company is the only Christian conservative wireless provider available on all three major networks.
	And ladies and gentlemen, we cannot, cannot emphasize enough how helpful they are for us on the road and when we're traveling.
	Patriot Mobile keeps us locked in.
	Get ready.
	They are here for you.
	You should make the call today.
	The switching is extremely easy and make sure that you're supporting a company that not only supports your First and Second Amendment rights, but also supports faith, family, and freedom.
	Right now, go to patriotmobile.com slash Benny.
	Call 972 Patriot for a free month of service with promo code Benny.
	Make the switch today.
	Defend freedom with every single call or text you make.
	PatriotMobile.com slash Benny or call 972 Patriot.
	Ladies and gentlemen, okay, so we have President Trump.
	We do not know when he will be popping out on the stage there, but we are very thankful for our very newsworthy next guest, Representative Andy Ogles from Tennessee, the great Congressman.
	While going back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	you you you Congressman, we apologize.
	Rudy, just like his telling stories about Hillary Clinton balling advance.
	No, they were fantastic.
	I mean, I'll be honest, I could listen to him all day.
	And Bill Clinton's rape accuser is being walked into the...
	Right, right.
	We apologize.
	Our time can be cut short because the president may jump in.
	So we can cut to the chase.
	But, you know, obviously there was a really shocking Democratic primary in the city of New York.
	By the way, the great city of New York.
	And so they've got their issues with liberal policies.
	And we could spend a whole episode on that.
	But this guy is a nut job.
	And so, but as we look at, so he became a naturalized citizen.
	And so we sent a letter to Pam Bondi.
	So that's kind of where we're at.
	I'll let you queue up and, you know, whatever you want to do.
	And I can answer questions.
	We have your letter.
	We have the mayor.
	We have Mr. Mayor.
	We have Mr. Mayor.
	Of course, Rudy Giuliani was a federal prosecutor.
	He just made a ton of news in the last interview saying you absolutely need to investigate this guy.
	You need to investigate him for his connections to terrorist organizations.
	If you're rapping about him, as your letter states, if you're rapping about helping Hamas and the guys who funded Hamas who are in prison for funding Hamas, well, you've got to at least be in favor of it.
	There's got to be something that you like about that.
	Maybe you can elucidate further for us what your office found.
	So to give your viewers context, so like on your naturalization forms, you know, there's a section on there where it talks about your activity in your alliances.
	And so we've continued to dig.
	The teams continue to dig.
	So we actually have breaking news for your show that, you know, so he became a citizen, naturalized citizen in 2018.
	And so at the same time he's filling out these forms to become a citizen, he's joining a communist group here in the United States.
	And so if we can go back and fill in the dots of when he was joining that group versus when he filled out that paperwork, it may very, very well disqualify him for being a citizen of the United States of America.
	That's why this is so important.
	And so what we're trying to do, even for some reason that he slips through the fingers, he slips through the cracks and we can't get him, we're going to create a template for we can go after other radicals who come to this country, become a citizen, and quite frankly, they're a sleeper to undermine our government.
	Yeah, I mean, it does seem like a sleeper cell operation here.
	But it's like on its, you just have to look at what he stands for.
	He's now potentially under investigation by the DOJ.
	We just got that from Harmeet Dylan, who says, you know, you're not allowed to tax people based on their skin color.
	One of his ideas, again, this is very much a Marxist idea.
	This is like where he's from in Uganda or South Africa.
	This is what happens all the time.
	You go after specific people because of their skin color.
	We're so sorry, Congressman.
	President Trump just came out on the stage.
	This morning, the Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law.
	In striking down the excessive use of nationwide injunctions to interfere with the normal functioning of the executive branch, the Supreme Court has stopped the presidency itself.
	That's what they've done.
	And really, it's been an amazing period of time, this last hour.
	There are people elated all over the country.
	I've seen such happiness and spirit.
	Sometimes you don't see that, but this case is very important.
	I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers.
	It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation.
	In practice, this meant that if any one of the nearly 700 federal judges disagreed with the policy of a duly elected president of the United States, he or she could block that policy from going into effect or at least delay it for many years, tie it up in the court system.
	This was a colossal abuse of power which never occurred in American history prior to recent decades.
	And we've been hit with more nationwide injunctions than were issued in the entire 20th century together.
	Think of it, more than the entire 20th century, me.
	I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very big and complex problem.
	And they've made it very simple.
	I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas.
	Great people.
	Thanks for this decision and thanks to this decision.
	We can now promptly file to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis.
	And some of the cases we're talking about would be ending birthright citizenship, which now comes to the fore.
	That was meant for the babies of slaves.
	It wasn't meant for people trying to scam the system and come into the country on a vacation.
	This was, in fact, it was the same date, the exact same date, the end of the Civil War.
	It was meant for the babies of slaves.
	And it's so clean and so obvious.
	But this lets us go there and finally win that case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship.
	And it wasn't meant for that reason.
	It was meant for the babies of slaves.
	So thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries and numerous other priorities of the American people.
	We have so many of them.
	I have a whole list.
	I'm not going to bore you.
	And I'm going to have Pam get up and say a few words, but there's really, she could talk as long as she wants because this is a very important decision.
	This is a decision that covers a tremendous amount of territory.
	But I want to just thank again the Supreme Court for this ruling.
	It's a giant.
	It's a giant.
	And they should be very proud.
	And our country should be very proud of the Supreme Court today.
	And with that, I'd like you to listen to the words of Pam Bondi.
	She's an incredible Attorney General.
	We're very proud of her.
	And as you know, Todd Blanche is with us.
	And we have so many others that worked on this case and other cases.
	And I think they're doing a great job.
	Pam, please say a few words.
	Thank you, President Trump.
	Thank you for fighting for all Americans.
	Americans are finally getting what they voted for.
	No longer will we have rogue judges striking down President Trump's policies across the entire nation.
	No longer.
	Today in the 6-3 opinion, Justice Barrett correctly holds that the district court lacks authority to enter nationwide or universal injunctions.
	These lawless injunctions gave relief to everyone in the world instead of the parties before the court.
	As the Supreme Court held today, they turned district courts into the imperial judiciary.
	Active liberal justices, judges have used these injunctions to block virtually all of President Trump's policies.
	To put this in perspective, there are 94 federal judicial districts.
	Five of those districts throughout this country held 35 of the nationwide injunctions.
	Think about that.
	94 districts and 35 out of the 40 opinions with nationwide injunctions came from five liberal districts in this country.
	No longer, no longer.
	These injunctions have blocked our policies from tariffs to military readiness to immigration to foreign affairs, fraud, abuse, and many other issues.
	The judges have tried to seize the executive branch's power, and they cannot do that.
	No longer, no longer.
	And on immigration, on a side note, today marks 2,711 arrests on these terrorists and these gangs.
	Total arrest today with HSI investigations.
	And thank you, Stephen Miller.
	Thank you to Homeland Security.
	Thank you to everyone working hand in hand with the FBI on all of these transnational gangs.
	TDA has been a huge terror to our country, as well as MS-13, as well as Sinaloa cartels.
	No longer.
	No longer.
	These injunctions have allowed district court judges to be emperors.
	They vetoed all of President Trump's power, and they cannot do that.
	This has been a bipartisan problem that has lasted five presidential terms, five different presidents, and it has ended today.
	We will continue to fight for President Trump's policies.
	I want to thank the Office of White House Counsel, Dave Warrington.
	You and your staff have been incredible.
	Our Solicitor General's Office, John Sowers, Sarah Harris, and Todd Blanche and Amel Bovey.
	Todd's going to say a few words because we've had another major ruling today on transgender books and some other great wins that we've had.
	But no longer will they have this power in our country.
	It is the president's authority under his executive branch to do everything to fight for the American people, and he will continue to do that.
	That's why he was overwhelmingly elected.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Today's a great day for the rule of law.
	It's a great day for the Justice Department.
	And it's one that's been a long time coming and one that every American should have been waiting for with bated breath.
	And so I echo what the president said and Attorney General Bondi, that the Supreme Court did a great thing today, not only for this administration, but for every American in this country.
	If not for the injunctions case, we would be here talking about another great decision that came down today, the trans books case, which restores parents' rights to decide their child's education.
	Seems like a basic idea, but it took the Supreme Court to set the record state, and we thank them for that.
	And now that ruling allows parents to opt out of dangerous trans ideology and make the decisions for their children that they believe is correct.
	And so we thank the Supreme Court for that.
	There's been multiple decisions over the past several weeks that just show why this injunction, why this nationwide injunction ban had to happen.
	For example, what I mean by that is local district court judges issuing decisions that are clearly contrary to law just because they don't like the policy of President Trump.
	And when it gets to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court has to correct it.
	But that takes time.
	The Attorney General thanked our lawyers, and I'll do it again.
	Our lawyers are working 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to fight these injunctions and to emergency appeals, emergency stays, going back to the district court judge, asking them to change their view.
	And so their hard work is really paying off today, but over the past few weeks.
	We had a stay of an order that prevented DHS from moving aliens to a third country.
	We had a stay of an order that stopped the Department of Defense from implementing military readiness, the EO that President Trump signed.
	We had another stay of an order forcing reinstatement of fired executive branch employees entirely within the president and Article II, his right to do.
	We had a stay of, as you all know, of numerous Doge cases.
	And again, every one of those stays required a tremendous amount of work and effort by the lawyers and parties involved.
	And they should be doing other work.
	They should be doing the work that the president and this admin, these local judges who don't make decisions based on the law.
	They make decisions because they just simply don't agree with the administration's decision about a policy, and that's wrong.
	Thank you.
	Any questions?
	Yes, for fam, please.
	Go ahead.
	Sure.
	Thank you, Madam Attorney General.
	So as you know, the Supreme Court did not rule on the underlying constitutionality of the president's birthright citizenship order.
	So what is the plan now?
	Are you going to try to implement the EO just in states where there isn't a legal challenge?
	Yes, so birthright citizenship will be decided in October, in the next session by the Supreme Court, unless it comes down in the next few minutes.
	I guess it could come down.
	They're still, I think they're still deliberating right now on some cases.
	As you heard, we just got transgender books, which is a huge win.
	But most likely that will be decided in October in the next session.
	However, it indirectly impacts us because, as you correctly pointed out, if there's a birthright citizenship case in Oregon, it will only affect the plaintiff in Oregon, not the entire country.
	So yes, it's indirectly, but that's pending litigation and we're waiting on that in the next term.
	And how concerned are you that the Supreme Court will come back and determine that the executive order is unconstitutional?
	We're very confident in the Supreme Court.
	But again, it's pending litigation and that will directly be determined in October.
	But it indirectly impacts every case in this country.
	And we're thrilled with their decision today.
	Peter.
	Madam Attorney General, thank you for being here to take our questions.
	A couple questions to the both of you.
	The EO had a 30-day grace period before it goes into effect.
	Is there any thought about trying to make it effective immediately within that period of time?
	We're going to follow the law.
	We're going to make those decisions and we're going to do what's right in the bounds of the law.
	And then the DOJ didn't ask the justices to rule on the merits of the birthright citizenship ban, just for explanation purposes, why?
	Sure, because that's going to come down in October in the separate.
	This was huge because it's indirectly impacted today.
	As I said, it's now case by case.
	Let me reiterate, of the 35 of the 40 nationwide injunctions filed against this president, against his executive authority as president of the United States, 35 of them came from Maryland, D.C., Massachusetts, California, Washington.
	And that's crazy.
	These five districts.
	So yes, it indirectly impacts us.
	It will be a separate decision in October.
	Next question.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	A question for you, sir.
	Do you believe this ends the power of the lower court judges to stop your agenda?
	Do you see this as a full green light for your agenda going forward?
	Well, you'd have to really speak to the lawyers about that.
	But this is really also a decision based on common sense.
	It didn't work the other way.
	It was a disaster where somebody from a certain location in a very liberal state or a liberal judge or a liberal group of judges could tie up a whole country for years Because their decision would sometimes take years to overturn.
	We've overturned many of the decisions, but it would take years to do it.
	And we have to act quickly when it comes to illegal immigration.
	We have murderers, killers, we have drug dealers.
	We have what they've allowed to come into our country should never be forgotten.
	It should never be forgotten what they've done to our country.
	And we have to be able to act very quickly, and we're going to do that.
	Thank you.
	Daniel, just as Pony Bear, sir, I know that you praised her and her opinion here in this case.
	She has taken some heat, though, from some of your supporters who have labeled her weak, a squishy, a rattled law professor.
	What is your take on that?
	I don't know about that.
	I just have great respect for her.
	I always have.
	And her decision was brilliantly written today from all accounts.
	Transgender ruining, Mr. President, what would you say to Americans who fear that this is more and more concentration of power in the White House and the executive?
	Well, this way brings back the Constitution.
	This is what it's all about.
	And this is really the opposite of that.
	I mean, the question is fine, but it's the opposite.
	The Constitution has been brought back.
	Thank you so much, President Trump.
	Equal crossings in the border are zero now.
	Zero.
	Does everyone hear that?
	Trump 2028.
	Do you intend, President Trump?
	Who's that guy?
	I like him.
	I like him.
	He's working the cameras.
	With this new reality, President Trump, in the border, do you intend to engage personally with leaders from South America, not only Central America, in order to tackle this situation in a different way and if you have a perception of needing some presence from South America as Brazil, for example?
	They have great respect for our country now.
	They did things that nobody thought was possible.
	They took funding from 2% to 5%.
	Nobody thought they'd ever pay the 2%.
	And now they're paying the 5%.
	It's over a trillion dollars more a year.
	Think of that, a trillion dollars.
	Nobody thought that could happen.
	That's a different group of people, different countries.
	But we get along with a lot of countries.
	We are respected again.
	Our country, the U.S., is respected again.
	Was not respected six months ago.
	I can tell you.
	Yeah, go ahead, Trace.
	Mr. President, you have a deadline coming up on trade in two weeks.
	Which countries on trade, on tariffs?
	Which countries, if any, are close to agreements with the administration?
	Well, that's an interesting question.
	We've made a deal with China.
	We've made a deal with probably four or five different countries.
	With the UK, it was a great deal for both.
	And we're in the process of making some others.
	But ultimately, in fact, Scott is here.
	Howard Luttnick, these two guys have been doing an incredible job.
	And the people that work with them have been doing an incredible job.
	But, you know, we have 200 countries.
	You could say 200 countries plus.
	We can't do that.
	So at a certain point over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before, we're going to send out a letter.
	We talk to many of the countries, and we're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States.
	And it's going to go very quickly.
	But some of the bigger countries, so India, I think we're going to reach a deal where we have the right to go in and trade.
	Right now, it's restricted.
	You can't walk in there.
	You can't even think about it.
	We're looking to get a full trade barrier dropping, which is unthinkable.
	And I'm not sure that that's going to happen.
	But as of this moment, we've agreed to that, go into Indian trade.
	We're going to be trading in China.
	That's going to come a little bit down the road, but we're going to be trading in China.
	We have a lot of great things going, and we're getting along with countries, but some will be disappointed because they're going to have to pay tariffs.
	And we've taken in already hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs.
	No inflation.
	The only problem we have is we have a Fed guy that doesn't understand what's happening.
	And it would be great if it lower the rate because we'd be able to borrow a lot cheaper.
	Yeah, go ahead, please.
	Why don't we keep it on this subject?
	This is such a big subject.
	You know what?
	Trade is so big, but this, I don't know, in a certain way, this might be bigger than trade.
	I think this is bigger than trade.
	Yes, please go ahead.
	I was wondering, though, if you could, sir, on the transgender ruling, the Supreme Court ruling that parents with religious objections can pull their kids out of public school lessons that use LGBTQ materials.
	Pam brought it up.
	Your reaction to that ruling today, sir.
	I think the ruling was a great ruling, and I think it's a great ruling for parents.
	It's really a ruling for parents.
	They lost control of the schools.
	They lost control of their child.
	And this is a tremendous victory for parents.
	And I'm not surprised by it, but I am surprised that it went this far.
	It took us to bring life back to normal.
	So it's a wonderful.
	It's parental.
	And I kept saying, we will give you back your parental rights.
	They were taken away.
	And this is a tremendous victory for parents.
	Mr. President, if you look at the, back at the last week, it's been extraordinary in terms of the action in the Middle East.
	You were at The Hague.
	It's been a matter of a week, hasn't it?
	I'm wondering now, sir, if you believe that Iran has given up its long history of ambitions with nuclear weapons or what you would like to see from them to prove that they do.
	And what type of meetings is your administration looking for next week with Iran?
	So Iran wants to meet.
	As you know, their sites were obliterated.
	They're very evil nuclear sites.
	They were now has been proven.
	We had some fake news for a little while.
	The same people that covered the Hunter Biden laptop was from Russia.
	The same people that did three or four other Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.
	No, no, wait, wait, just listen.
	They came up with something that delayed the credit that our great pilots and these great Americans, I mean, what talent that was.
	And they hit it right down in the spot, 52,000 feet.
	Think of this dark, no moon, you couldn't see a thing.
	And they hit the refrigerator door, as they say, that's the size of a target, and overwhelmingly.
	And it's amazing what was done.
	We're the only ones that could have done it.
	And we took out two of the other sites also, in addition to that.
	We finished them off.
	That was very evil intention.
	I believe that, and again, Time will tell, but I don't believe that they're going to go back into nuclear anytime soon.
	They spent over a trillion dollars on nuclear, and they never got it together.
	And nothing was moved from the site, by the way.
	To do that is very dangerous.
	It's very, very heavy material.
	Those cars were most likely the cars of masons because they were pouring concrete at the top at the hatch, as you know, the hatch going into the nuclear site.
	They wanted to reinforce it, and they had some masons there pouring concrete.
	By the way, that concrete was obliterated.
	It hit exactly at the concrete.
	It was, I don't think it had a chance to dry, but everything's down there.
	It's under millions of tons of rock.
	Your administration has said that El Salvador is one of the safest countries in the hemisphere.
	So why haven't you yet temporary protective status to that country?
	Was it part of the deal?
	Well, we'll take a look.
	We've had a great relationship with El Salvador.
	They have a fantastic leader.
	They built a massive prison system.
	And I don't know exactly why, but it's a hell of a system.
	And we bring people there.
	And when they go there, they don't get out.
	And frankly, when they hear they have to go there, they become very nice people.
	They become very nice people.
	It's a tough system, but it's a brilliant system.
	And it's a system done by a very, very good leader.
	We'll talk about El Salvador.
	A lot of respect.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	A question for you, and then a question for the Attorney General.
	As you go into negotiations and talks with Iran, are you demanding not only that there would be no uranium production inside of Iran, but also that Iran would turn over all existing stockpiles of uranium?
	Well, you know, we're a little early for that, but something like that.
	Yeah, we'll do something like that.
	Let me say that I've been saying for 25 years, even as a civilian, you cannot let them have a nuclear weapon.
	And that's what happened.
	It's been obliterated.
	It would be years before they could ever get going.
	And I really think it's probably the last thing they have to recover from a hell of a tough war.
	Would you also be demanding that the IAEA have full rights to inspect in Iran?
	Or somebody, yeah, or somebody that we respect, including ourselves.
	And a question for both the president and the attorney general.
	Under birthright citizenship, if this is implemented, who would be tasked with actually vetting citizenship?
	And would this be a situation where you have nurses and doctors checking for citizenship of parents?
	This is all pending litigation.
	It's going to be decided in October by the Supreme Court, and we'll discuss that after the litigation.
	If you have an undocumented baby, would that baby then be an enforcement priority?
	The violent criminals in our country are the priority.
	Now, let me put it in perspective.
	Today marked the 2,711th arrest in our country of TDA members, just TDA.
	Everyone in this room agrees they are one of the most violent criminal organizations in the world.
	And the Biden administration let them walk into our country, walk into our country for the last four years.
	2,711 of them today have been arrested in our country.
	That is the priority of Donald Trump.
	That is the priority of this country, of Homeland Security, of all of our lawyers, of FBI.
	That's the priority.
	That will be discussed in October when the Supreme Court hopefully rules in our favor, and we're very confident of that.
	But you should all feel safer now that President Trump can deport all of these, all of these gangs, and not one district court judge can think they're an emperor over this administration and his executive powers and why the people of the United States elected him.
	This might add one thing.
	They used both citizenship, some of the worst people, some of the cartels to get people into our country, just so you know.
	And again, I say, if you look at the end of the Civil War, the 1800s, it was a very turbulent time.
	If you take the end day, was it 1869 or whatever?
	But you take that exact day.
	That's when the case was filed.
	And the case ended shortly thereafter.
	This had to do with the babies of slaves, very, very obviously.
	And I think we're going to win.
	People didn't, I don't think they went about discussing it right.
	I came along and we looked and we said, wait a minute, this is wrong.
	We've been looking at birthright citizenship wrong for years, but they've used it.
	The cartels have used birthright citizenship to get very bad people in.
	And what Pam's doing and what Todd and everybody else, what they're doing at DOJ and all over, FBI, ICE, Border Patrol.
	These are incredible people.
	They're trying to keep our country safe and they don't want to have people come in.
	This is just another way that they get illegal immigrants into our country.
	And in some cases, very, very bad ones.
	Go ahead.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	On your tax bill, if I could for a moment, senators are racing to rewrite parts of it right now after the Senate parliamentarian ruled that sections of it were outside of the process that they're using to get this through.
	Do you think that senators should respect the decisions of the parliamentarian?
	And what have you personally done in the last 48 hours to try and get Republican senators who are against the bill to a yes?
	Well, look, it's a great bill.
	It's a massive tax cut.
	If it's not approved, your taxes will go up by 68%.
	Think of that, 68%, a record, the highest in the history.
	The Democrats won't approve it only because politically it's so good for the Republicans.
	The Democrats aren't approving it.
	But think of what they're not approving.
	They're not approving border security.
	We've done a great job at the border, but we have to add some wall.
	We have to do various things.
	We have no money for that.
	We have no money for the border.
	We have no money for so many things.
	But if the Democrats, it'd be interesting to see if we get any Democrat votes.
	We should.
	If I were a Democrat, I would absolutely, maybe Fetterman, because he seems to be the most sensible one lately.
	If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long because it's tax cuts and so many other things that are common sense.
	They're basic things.
	I think they're doing fine.
	The parliamentarian's been a little difficult, and I would say that I disagree with the parliamentarian on some things and on other ways he's been fine.
	But we'll have to see.
	It's a big issue.
	I will tell you this: if that bill doesn't pass, the country will get a 68% tax increase.
	So, think of this: you're a Democrat and you vote against it.
	That means you're voting in favor because essentially you're voting in favor of the largest tax hike in the history of our country, and you can't do that.
	In addition, we're cutting costs by $1.7 trillion, and it won't affect anybody.
	It's just fraud, waste, and abuse.
	Mr. President, Mr. President, a leading global economist just did a 180 and says your tariff plan, you may have outsmarted everybody with it.
	What is your message?
	I love this.
	I love this question.
	Just a favorite.
	This is the best question I've ever been asked because I've been going through abuse for years on this.
	Because, as you know, we're taking in hundreds of billions of dollars, no inflation whatsoever.
	But, Mr. President, what is your message to critics who think your tariff plan will cause a recession?
	I think they should go back to business school.
	It's so obvious.
	It's so obvious.
	I mean, we're taking in billions and billions of dollars from China and a lot of other countries.
	We took in, I had a call from somebody in the House and high official, sir, we have a problem.
	We don't know what to do.
	The books are a mess.
	I said, what do I mean by the books?
	The books, the money coming in, it's so terrible.
	I figured, oh boy, what's this?
	I don't like this question.
	I said, so what seems, there's so much money coming in, and there must be some kind of an accounting mistake because we have hundreds of billions of dollars more money than we thought.
	I said, do me a favor, go check the gear.
	Call me back.
	You have to call me back.
	Check the tariff column.
	Calls me back two hours later, says, you're right.
	We took in 88 billion in tariffs.
	They have so much money coming in.
	But more important than the money coming in, we have companies coming in, factories coming in, auto plants being built.
	AI is being built here instead of being built all over Europe and Asia.
	We have all of it.
	We have over $15 trillion, just about, Scott.
	I think we're right about that number.
	We went to Saudi Arabia.
	We went to Qatar.
	We went to UAE.
	Very smart people, very smart leaders, great leaders.
	And we took in $5.1 trillion just there.
	Without the tariffs, I mean, they also liked a thing called November 5th, November 6th, and November 7th.
	That was a very good little period of time.
	It's called the presidential election.
	You know, you used to have one day election.
	Now you have it over.
	But even if you just took that little period, because it was pretty obvious it was going to be a landslide.
	And they like that, but they love the tariffs.
	I had Texas Instruments come in the other day, big company, and he said, we're putting in $60 billion into new plants and new equipment, new everything.
	Sir, you're going to keep the tariffs, aren't you?
	Because whoever took the tariffs off, and we are going to absolutely keep it.
	And they're worried that somebody that, like this communist from New York someday gets elected, I can't believe that's happening.
	That's a terrible thing for our country, by the way.
	He's a communist.
	We're going to go to a communistic.
	That's so bad for New York.
	But the rest of the country is revolting against it.
	But if somebody got elected, they're afraid that if this was taken off, well, we're going to guarantee it's never going to be taken off.
	And again, we're taking in hundreds.
	Think of this, hundreds of billions of dollars.
	And they were all confused because they've never seen this before.
	You know, it's always the other way.
	We don't have enough money.
	So much money is coming in at levels that nobody's ever seen.
	But most importantly, we have factories being built, car plants being built, companies moving to our country like never before.
	If you look at 15 trillion, and that's only in a few months, you know, I haven't been here that long.
	Presidents, like the last one, was a disaster.
	He's the worst president in the history of our country, by the way.
	What he did on our border can never, ever be forgotten.
	To me, that's the worst of all the things.
	And he's done some terrible things, grossly incompetent.
	Nobody knew it was him because I don't think it was him.
	I think it was whoever was controlling the autopen.
	But our country is doing great.
	And those leaders and other leaders, I just left, as you know, a large group of the most highly respected people.
	And that includes big countries.
	When you look at Germany and France and Spain, although Spain didn't come through, but they will.
	By the way, guaranteed they will.
	That was the only country that sort of tried to hold back on putting up the money.
	But just so you know, they said, it's unbelievable what's happened to the USA.
	You were a dead country.
	We didn't respect the country, the leader.
	You were dead as a doornail.
	One said to me, you went from being a dead country, you are right now the hottest country anywhere in the world.
	The whole world is talking about the USA, and everybody wants a part of it, and they're pouring into our country.
	And you're going to see those numbers.
	Thank you for that question.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	I have a question about trade.
	Secretary Bessend has said that he hopes tariff deals with major partners will be done by Labor Day.
	So if some deals are not done by your July 9th deadline, will some countries' tariffs go back up or will they stay where they are?
	There are some countries that are used to ripping us off, to be honest with you.
	And I don't want to name them, but you sort of can name them.
	And they're so used to just, you know, getting, taking billions and billions of, look, we had a trade deficit of more than a trillion dollars.
	Think of a trillion, a trade deficit.
	That's because nobody cared.
	Nobody, we cared a lot.
	I took in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariff.
	We had the greatest economy in history up until now.
	I think we're going to blow it away.
	But during my time, and especially prior to COVID, we had the greatest economy in the history of our country.
	I think we're going to blow it away now based on the kind of numbers that we're seeing.
	But some countries are very angry because they've been ripping us off for years.
	They've been making billions and billions of dollars.
	There was nobody to negotiate with.
	They could do whatever they want.
	They charge us tariffs, by the way, at numbers that we've never seen before.
	And we ended up losing much more than a trillion dollars a year, a trillion dollars a year on trade.
	And now they're being met with a force that's far greater than them, and they don't like it.
	So they're upset because instead of making, you know, five billion dollars, they're going to break even.
	Well, they'll make a little bit.
	I want to be nice.
	They'll make a little bit.
	Oh, we'll make a little bit.
	It's a big difference.
	Yeah, please go.
	But red risk.
	On the 2020 election, is there any more information on the special prosecutor?
	So many Americans still have questions about the 2020 election.
	And speaking of rogue judges, would you consider appointing somebody at DOJ maybe to investigate the judges that allowed for the political persecution of you, your family, and your supporters during the Biden administration?
	I love you.
	Who are you?
	Tom Carroll from Lindell TV.
	Well, that's a very nice question.
	And it's not a setup.
	I have no idea who you are, but I appreciate that question.
	All I can say is we're not here for that.
	I hope so.
	I hope they're doing the thing because that election was rigged and stolen, and we can't allow that to happen.
	You know, a lot of people tell me, sir, you just won the greatest election in the history of our country.
	You won at numbers that won all seven swing states, won the popular vote, won everything.
	Sir, go on with your life.
	And many people say that, good people, friends of mine, then you have people that say that same thing, go on with your life, but you have to find out what happened because you can't let that happen again.
	Look at what this lunatic did.
	Look at what he did.
	He opened our borders to people that were murderers, 11,888, to be exact, murderers.
	And we've captured many of those murderers and we're bringing them back.
	Some of them are so dangerous that we don't even want to bring them back.
	We're afraid they're going to try and come back in.
	But he allowed people to come into this country, people from mental institutions, insane asylums.
	That's a mental institution on steroids.
	People from mental institutions, gang members, drug dealers, people, oh, jails being emptied out into our country.
	Venezuela emptied out almost its entire prison population into our country.
	But I don't want to blame them.
	Many countries have done that.
	The Congo, you know, we have a great press conference coming up later, and it's the Congo and Rwanda.
	You know, they were fighting for years, and it was machetes, it was vicious, it was as vicious people's heads being chopped off.
	And I have a man who's very good in that part of the world, very smart, and put them together.
	And we're signing a peace treaty today.
	First time in many years, they're going to have peace.
	And it's a big deal.
	You know, we talk about Russia, and we're going to work.
	We're working that one.
	President Putin called up and he said, I'd love to help you with Iran.
	I said, do me a favor.
	I'll handle Iran.
	Help me with Russia.
	We got to get that one settled.
	And I think something's going to happen there.
	But we did some great work.
	India and Pakistan, that was going to be maybe nuclear.
	We did that.
	We did a lot of work.
	I don't know if there's ever been a precedent that's done much more.
	Serbia, Kosovo, who's going to go at it.
	Going to be a big war.
	I said, you go at it.
	There's no trade with the United States.
	They said, well, maybe we won't go at it.
	That's what happened with India and Pakistan.
	I was negotiating with both of them, and I said to Scott, I said to Howard, cancel all deals with India and Pakistan.
	They're not trading with us because they're in a war.
	They called back.
	What do we do?
	I said, look, you want to have trade with the United States.
	It's great.
	But you want to go and start using nuclear weapons on each other.
	We're not going to allow that.
	And they both agreed.
	Both have great leaders.
	They both agreed not to do it.
	So we did a lot, but I appreciate that question.
	Thank you so much.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	I was just speaking with Senator Ron Johnson on the One Big Beautiful Bill, and he says he really wants to get to yes for you and get this accomplished.
	He does.
	He's a good man.
	But he also said that he needs more time, and he is not certain that the July 4th deadline is because there's too much work.
	He's a good man.
	Ron Johnson's doing a good job.
	He's very committed.
	Every Republican senator is committed.
	And, you know, you could have a couple of grandstanders, in all fairness.
	You could have somebody else.
	And it's very dangerous because our country would go from being the most successful country in the world to who knows what happens with a 68%.
	Think of it, 68% tax increase.
	That was given by the Democrats because they like high taxes.
	I don't know what happened.
	You know, all my life, I'd grow up and I'd watch politicians talking.
	I'd say, oh, that's fun.
	And they were always saying, we will cut your taxes.
	We will cut your tax.
	I never heard it.
	They say we will raise your taxes.
	And they elect people like this guy in New York that maybe has a chance.
	I find it hard to believe, but he maybe has a chance.
	They want to raise your taxes.
	So they want to see a 68% tax increase.
	That's more money than anybody could afford.
	You'd go into a depression if that ever happened.
	So I think there's a lot of pressure to get that approved.
	How important is the July 4th deadline to you?
	It's important.
	It's not the end all.
	It's taking no longer, but we'd like to get it done by that time if possible.
	And look, we have a lot of very committed people, and they feel very strongly about a subject, subjects that you're not even thinking about, that are important to Republicans.
	The problem we have is that it's a great bill.
	It's a popular bill, but we'll get no Democrats only because they don't want to vote for Trump.
	If that bill was their bill, oh, they would be so happy.
	It's so great for our military.
	It's great for everything.
	And they would normally vote, but because their hatred of Trump, they have Trump derangement syndrome at levels never seen before.
	And instead of voting for a tax cut, they're voting for a tax increase of 68%.
	They're voting to destroy Social Security, destroy Medicare, and destroy Medicaid.
	And we're voting to make them perfect and to make them better, make them stronger and better.
	They're going to destroy Medicaid and they're going to destroy Medicare and Social Security will follow.
	If you vote for the Democrats, you're dead on those three things.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	On a related subject, many Democrats have said that they are not going to support crypto bills in Congress only because of you And your family's personal crypto ventures, and these votes are in some cases needed to pass.
	Are you open to the idea of pulling away from your personal crypto ventures just for the next few years if that helps get these crypto bills passed in the next few months?
	Well, it's a very funny thing, crypto.
	So, I became a fan of crypto, and to me, it's an industry.
	I view it as an industry, and I'm president.
	And if we didn't have it, China would or somebody else would, but most likely China, China would love to.
	And we've dominated that industry.
	It's a big industry, by the way.
	In fact, when the stock market went down recently, crypto and Bitcoin and all of that went down much less than anybody else as a group.
	And we've created a very powerful industry.
	And that's much more important than anything that we invest in.
	We invest in it, but really, that was an industry that wasn't doing particularly well.
	I got involved with it a couple of years ago and before this whole, before the second term.
	I got involved before I decided to run.
	I only decided to run because I saw what was happening, and Biden was incompetent, and the administration was crooked and incompetent.
	And I was in Bitcoin then, not knowing if I was going to do it a third time.
	So it's become amazing.
	I mean, it's the jobs that it produces.
	And I notice more and more you pay in Bitcoin.
	I mean, people are saying it takes a lot of pressure off the dollar.
	And it's a great thing for our country.
	So I don't care about investing.
	You know, I have kids and they invest in different things.
	They do believe in it.
	But I'm president.
	And what I did do there is build an industry that's very important.
	And, you know, if we didn't have it, China would.
	Okay.
	With the glasses, gentlemen, go ahead, please.
	Go ahead.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	So are you going to cut funds in the sanctuary states, like, for instance, California, that keep supporting the legal immigration, and then these people work under it?
	We're giving them a hard time.
	And also, foreign policy questions.
	They have a man that wants to give away everything to people that nobody's seen before.
	If we didn't go into Los Angeles with the military, which did a fantastic job, but if we didn't go into Los Angeles bringing in the National Guard, I would have brought the military if it was necessary because you have to.
	We have the right to.
	That was another thing upheld by the Supreme Court.
	But if we didn't go in with the National Guard and be strong and tough, you wouldn't maybe have a Los Angeles.
	It would be like the rest of California, the rest of Los Angeles.
	They lost 25,000 houses in a fire.
	They should have lost none.
	You know, I sent the water down.
	I had to break into their water supply because they just refused to do it.
	They're crazy.
	There's something wrong with them.
	They have plenty of water.
	They don't have droughts or anything.
	We let it come down from the Pacific Northwest.
	They routed all the water out into the Pacific Ocean for environmental reasons, okay?
	And now you have 25,000 houses, none of which would have burned down if you had the water.
	They didn't have water.
	They didn't have water for the fire pumps.
	They didn't have water in the sprinkler systems that people put in.
	So the answer is we're going to work with governors.
	We're going to work with radical left Democrats and Democrats.
	And we're going to make it good for everybody.
	We have to stop the crime in those in the case of the cities, I think I can say just about all cities with heavy crime are run by Democrats.
	Go ahead.
	Yeah, with the glasses.
	I'm with you all.
	Go ahead, yes.
	No, no, the man behind you.
	Yeah, please.
	President Trump, Anthony Mashak from MTV, Lebanon.
	I want to ask you regarding the threats posed by Iran's allies and proxies operating in the U.S. They were threatening your life.
	So what do you say about that?
	And regarding Lebanon, because Hezbollah is as well part of Iran's allies, is there any time frame in Lebanon regarding disarming Hezbollah in Lebanon?
	Yeah, Lebanon is a great place with brilliant people.
	You know, it was known for the professors and doctors and had an incredible history.
	And hopefully we can bring it back again.
	I just appointed a friend of mine who's Lebanese.
	And I didn't know he was Lebanese.
	I've known him for 20 years.
	Very, very successful man.
	And I just appointed him.
	And I said, why would you want that?
	He says, because I was born there.
	I was raised there.
	I love it.
	I love it so much.
	I said, you know, it's very dangerous going to Lebanon as ambassador.
	And he said, that's what they say, but I don't care about danger.
	I mean, this is a guy that is just a very big business guy.
	He wants to give up his whole life to go to Lebanon because he believes in it so much.
	We're with Lebanon all the way.
	We'll try and straighten it out.
	They're threatening that your life has risen.
	Threatened my life.
	Yeah, they have threatened.
	I get that throbbing feeling every once in a while.
	Get that throbbing feeling.
	But you know what?
	That's okay.
	This is a dangerous business.
	What I do is a dangerous business.
	You know, I tell the story of the car companies and different people in different professions.
	You have race car drivers, as an example.
	One-tenth of 1% die.
	Bull riders, one-tenth of 1%.
	That's not a lot, but it's people die.
	When you're president, it's about 5%.
	If somebody would have told me that, maybe I wouldn't have run.
	Okay?
	This is a very dangerous profession.
	By the way, so many questions.
	Should we keep this going, Pamela?
	This is the opposite of Biden.
	Biden would take a half a question and he'd leave without answering it.
	On Iran.
	And you tell me when it gets boring.
	If it's wrong.
	No, I'm not from Iran.
	I'm from the UK.
	But if the intelligence reports conclude that Iran can enrich uranium to a level that concerns you, would you consider bombing the country again?
	Without question, absolutely.
	Have you had any concerns?
	It turned out to be unbelievable.
	But, you know, our incredible flyers and our, I call them the shots.
	These guys are unbelievable.
	Think from 52,000 feet, they hit the equivalent of a refrigerator door.
	They actually hit it right in the center, so it's much smaller than that.
	And just bomb after bomb going deeper, deeper, blowing up.
	Incredible, incredible thing.
	I don't know if you heard the general.
	He was very impressive, Raisin Kane.
	You know, he's the one that beat ISIS for me.
	And he did it in a matter of weeks.
	And I was told it was going to take four or five years.
	And when I got this job, I always said, if I get this job, I'm going to put that guy as the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Dan Kane.
	And he, when I heard his name was Raisin, his nickname is Raisin, Raisin Kane.
	I said, you got to be kidding.
	So I liked him right from the beginning, but he knocked out ISIS in a time that nobody ever thought possible.
	And when this attack was completed and so successful, I said, now I know how you knocked out ISIS so quickly.
	But we have the best people.
	We have the best equipment in the world.
	You know, I rebuilt the military during my four years during my other term.
	We have the best equipment in the world.
	The problem is we gave away, you know, a lot of it, but small, relatively speaking.
	We gave a lot of it away to Afghanistan.
	Shouldn't have happened.
	That just shows how incompetent they were.
	They gave all that equipment away.
	Billions and billions of dollars worth shouldn't have happened.
	But that was small compared to what we have.
	Now we have a great military with great people.
	Okay.
	Mr. President, congratulations.
	A couple of very different questions.
	One is Rwanda 1994.
	As you grew up in New York, we all knew how horrific those attacks were.
	Congratulations on that treaty.
	There are talks that perhaps- We're going to have a signing with Rwanda and the Congo.
	So I'm a little out of my league in that one because I didn't know too much about it.
	I knew one thing.
	They were going at it for many years and with machetes.
	It is one of the worst, one of the worst wars that anyone's ever seen.
	And I just happened to have somebody that was able to get it settled.
	I mean, just a brilliant person who is very comfortable in that part of the world.
	It's a very dangerous part of the world.
	I said, are you uncomfortable there?
	People are being killed.
	School children are being raided and killed.
	And I don't even want to say how, but as viciously as I've ever heard, are you uncomfortable?
	No, that's the part of the world that I know.
	Very comfortable.
	Was able to get them together and sell it.
	And not only that, we're getting for the United States a lot of the mineral rights from the Congo.
	It's part of that.
	They're so honored to be here.
	They never thought they'd be coming to it.
	Look, this is a very tough part of the world.
	They never thought, they were just telling me they never thought they'd ever be coming to the White House.
	And they're so honored.
	And so we're going to give them a great big reception.
	But that's after many years of fighting.
	It's a great thing.
	That's at three o'clock, I believe.
	Sir, are you concerned at all about secret nuclear sites in Iran?
	You can talk about maybe just.
	Secret nuclear sites?
	Yes, there might be some of that nuclear.
	Can I tell you?
	They're exhausted.
	And Israel's exhausted too.
	And I dealt with both of them.
	And they both wanted it settled, both of them.
	And we did a great job, but they're exhausted.
	The last thing they're thinking about right now is nuclear.
	You know what they're thinking of?
	They're thinking about tomorrow, trying to live.
	It's such a mess.
	It's such a mess.
	The place was bombed to hell.
	And no, I'm not worried about it at all.
	And I'm putting out a little statement.
	I'm going to respond to the Ayatollah's statement yesterday that we won the war.
	We won the war.
	And I said, look, you're a man of great faith, a man who's highly respected in this country.
	You have to tell the truth.
	You got beat to hell.
	And Israel was beat up too.
	They were both beat up.
	And it was a great time to end it.
	It was quick.
	They got the hate out.
	A lot of hate, a lot of hate.
	It would be great if they didn't have that hate.
	The last thing they're thinking about is nuclear weapons right now.
	Thank you, Mr. President.
	Iris Howe with NTD Research to Media with the Atlas Times.
	Thank you so much for doing this.
	It's very refreshing for all of us here.
	It's a good group in this room.
	It's refreshing.
	Very refreshing.
	Yes, we have listened.
	I understand what you mean.
	So thank you so much for coming out here.
	Other than Caroline's done a great job.
	Yes, sir.
	You're referring to the past administration, not to Caroline.
	Yes.
	Back to the ruling today, if you don't mind.
	So you have always talked about winning for the American people.
	How do you think today's ruling will enable you to further deliver for American families and workers across the country, not only when it comes to immigration, also when it comes to trade, energy?
	What actions are most eager to move forward?
	Well, I think taking power away from these absolutely crazy radical left judges is a tremendous.
	This is such a big day.
	This is such a big day.
	It's like it's sort of sad because we're doing the signing at three o'clock.
	And this may very well dominate the signing of a big war that was going on and really affecting the continent of, think of it, the entire continent of Africa was being affected.
	We're settling that war today.
	And this will probably be your headline.
	But this is a very big moment.
	And it gives power back to people that should have it, including Congress, including the presidency.
	And it only takes bad power away from judges.
	It really doesn't take power.
	It takes bad power, sick power, and unfair power.
	And it's really going to be, this is a very monumental decision.
	Yeah, please.
	Thank you very much.
	On July 9th, is that July 9th date set for tariffs to stand back?
	Or could there be a We can do whatever we want.
	We could extend it.
	We could make it shorter.
	I'd like to make it shorter.
	I'd like to just send letters out to everybody.
	Congratulations, you're paying 25%.
	He's a much nicer person than I am.
	So how do you finish it up?
	Who are you considering for the Federal Reserve then?
	And are you speeding up that process, I see Secretary?
	Oh, he's terrible.
	He's terrible.
	I mean, I have a list of things.
	We're like 38 on the list.
	We pay, you know, Cameroon and different places are paying the same as us.
	Because, you know, you have somebody sets a rate at 4% or 4.5%.
	It's hard to go out and say we should be paying 1% when you have your so-called experts doing that.
	And the sad part is, you know, as per the question that you asked about tariffs, we've had the tariffs and we have less Inflation than we had before.
	What we have is a hell of a lot more money, a hell of a lot more income, and we shouldn't be paying a rate like that.
	In other words, when we pay a rate, I'll tell you each point is the equivalent of $300 billion.
	So if we had it down three points, because I think we should be at one, you have Switzerland is at 0.25, in other words, 25% of 1%.
	And they're the number one right now, but we should be the number one.
	And soon you're going to have, I believe, I think you're going to have where the people will pay the best, you know, will pay, like we had a few years ago, where you put up money, you loan money.
	And I mean, you actually, instead of paying, you get paid.
	I love that.
	I don't know if it's any good, but I love it where you put up money and you get paid.
	But we should be in a category.
	So we should be at the top of the list, not toward the bottom of the list.
	But we have a man who's not a smart man, and he probably has Trump derangement syndrome.
	And he's just not a smart person.
	What he's doing, though, is hurting us for years to come, because if we borrow money at two points higher than we should be paying, that's $600 billion.
	Wouldn't you say those numbers are about right, Scott?
	So it's two points would be about $600, actually more than that, but about $600 billion.
	All because the guy doesn't want to lower the rates.
	He's doing the service, a very disservice.
	And then he goes up, talks about, I'd like to see costs come down.
	You know, he gets up and he does his little thing for five minutes and he goes out and he goes back to the beach.
	He goes, I'd like to see costs come down.
	Well, he could lower the interest costs by $900 billion a year.
	All he has to do is lower rates.
	And everybody's saying, I was watching some of the business shows today, and they're saying, you know, Trump's right.
	He should really be cutting.
	The country's doing well.
	We have no inflation.
	Now, despite him, we're doing great.
	But if we got the rates down, we would be a rocket ship.
	So I think that'll be it.
	And I just want to thank everybody.
	This is a really big day.
	We've had a big week.
	You know, we've had a big week.
	We've had a lot of victories this week.
	NATO was a tremendous victory.
	The war was a tremendous victory.
	Look, we were talking about this for 30 years, about Iran being nuclear.
	And all I said is it will not be nuclear and it's not going to be nuclear.
	And, you know, I want to give credit to a lot of people, most importantly, to our great military.
	Boy, they put out that fire.
	Once that happened, once those bombs got dropped, that war was over.
	That war was over.
	But I just want to compliment them and credible the general and all of his generals.
	Pete Hegseth was great.
	They were all.
	And now I want to compliment Pam.
	A lot of genius went into this.
	You know, people, if you don't say it exactly right, if the Supreme Court doesn't get it because it's incorrectly spoken about, and that happens, a lot of cases are lost because they don't say the right words.
	But I want to correct, she's going to go down as a great attorney general.
	I may change my mind about that.
	I don't know.
	Maybe someday I'll have calls and say, I was only kidding.
	She's going to go down as a great attorney general.
	This was a tremendous win.
	And we've had tremendous wins, but this was a tremendous win today.
	So I just want to congratulate you and Todd and your whole staff.
	Very brilliant people.
	And we can't forget John Sauer, who is with, there's a medical emergency within his family, so he's taking care of that.
	And we said absolutely.
	So I just want to thank everybody very much.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, Mr. Sr.
	Ladies and gentlemen, you know, when you're doing the show, you want to stay locked in with Rudy and with the congressman.
	Man, we were just like blistering, and Rudy is Rudy.
	He's a chatter, you know, he's a talker.
	So we didn't get read in on the incredible news that is breaking all across the country.
	Just absolutely, just absolute massive bombshell after bombshell after bombshell after bombshell.
	An incredible series of wins for President Trump inside of the Supreme Court today, including wins against alphabet propaganda, transgender propaganda, the Supreme Court ruling.
	ALX, give me an authoritative list, please.
	Like I'm looking at the build today.
	Klein, I need you over to the production chat to grab the build.
	All right.
	Get me the authoritative list.
	So the major, the major ruling was in order to restrict these district courts against ruling against President Trump in nationwide injunctions, which has, of course, been so nasty and so obnoxious and has hamstrung these degenerate,
	bitter, nasty, incel district judges have been sending these rulings as total restrictive shots across the bow to destroy the power of the executive.
	And they collapsed that.
	And that was, I think, the most important ruling today.
	But there are many others, including the Supreme Court ruling at 6-3 in order to essentially allow President Trump's block to birthright citizenship nationwide.
	It's a massive ruling.
	And there, of course, shouldn't be birthright citizenship in this country.
	None other country on earth would ever have such an insane policy that you can just come here as a tourist, have a baby, and that baby is suddenly an American or Chinese.
	That's insane.
	I mean, if you applied it anywhere else, it would make no sense.
	So you go and you travel to France, and you travel to France as a pregnant person, and you have a baby in France.
	And then your kid's French?
	Like, by right, it's obscene.
	It's obscene.
	So nationwide injunctions on constitutional birthright citizenship, parents have the right to opt out of their kids being indoctrinated by transgender demonic madness.
	And Texas, all states, this was a Zoo Brawl in Texas, can require age verification from porn sites.
	Very good.
	Brick by brick, the entire political edifice of the pagan and secular, godless, left-wing political superstructure is being torn asunder.
	A fantastic day at the Supreme Court.
	Ladies and gentlemen, maybe the best day ever in the history of the Supreme Court just happened while we were live on the show.
	Fox News recaps on this from the front of the Supreme Court.
	Ladies and gentlemen, we got these loaded.
	OK, Jonathan Turley responses.
	And Fox News just gasping as the rulings came crashing down in favor of President Trump one after another.
	of them being written by amy cody barrett who has of course stood against president trump in many uh in many regards over the course of the last few sessions at the supreme court uh donald trump obviously having a massive victory lap there at the white house uh and then fox news is i want jonathan turley's take thank you okay here we go look like a victory for
	the Trump administration, Justice Barrett is saying that the only way for justices to exercise this type of universal injunction in some of these cases is equitable relief.
	But she does not find evidence that that type of relief was granted to these judges.
	So they indicate that the administration is likely to prevail on this issue.
	All of that is going to be awfully good news for this administration.
	They have been really hit with these sort of Lilliputian attacks.
	All these to individual district judges.
	effectively freezing federal policy and programs across the country so it does appear to be a victory it may be a bit more nuanced but i would do so far it looks like a good day for the trump administration the best day possibly in the history of the supreme court's rulings uh against or for the trump administration is today never seen anything like it the big one obviously being the nationwide injunctions and
	you heard pambondi uh going berserker mode uh there inside of the white house amazing stuff okay uh ladies and gentlemen we would be totally remiss if we didn't uh deliver on a massive victory like this without salting our libs now sadly my salt shaker is all the way over here but you know what i do have here next to me is
	my coffee you know it's inside of my benny show mug coffee ladies and gentlemen you know that's the sweet blackout sweet nectar of blackout coffee that courses through my veins uh in spite of the fact that we were uh flying out to new york we did a 6 a.m flight to new york and then we we got back after midnight last night because new york is so dysfunctional we sat on a tarmac for like three hours last night it's so irritating but anyway the point is is that we are still
	locked and loaded for today and ready to deliver for you and to show up for you blackout coffee gets us there blackout coffee you've heard me talk about it for a long time right now hard work grit the american dream happening right here in the state of florida no communists working at their 64 000 foot facility they are absolutely rocking and rolling they employ a team of dozens of americans right here in america they're exactly what you want uh outside of your cup and inside your cup they fill our cup on this
	program ladies and gentlemen and give us the energy uh that we need actually on a day like today we need a little extra energy we are cooking though and prepare we have some very exciting exciting things uh for you i cannot wait for you to see this aoc product it's amazing if you believe in hard work american values and coffee that actually tastes like coffee go to blackoutcoffee.com slash benny use code benny for 20 off in your first order support the american dream and drink blackout blackoutcoffee.com slash benny stop settling start drinking real coffee all right ladies and
	gentlemen grabbing my salt shaker here shall we okay here we go ah yes there we go the salt shaker here's our salty lib on these massive victories for president trump at the supreme court give him the salt we're learning today that the court by a 6-3 majority anna has
	decided to stay the injunctions partially they're saying that they will grant the government's application for stays but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue and let me go back a second zoom out for a second if i can one of the questions here was if the court was going to stay these injunctions how were they going to do it were
	they going to say that each injunction could only apply in the district where it was entered?
	In two cases here, those districts were actually statewide, the District of New Jersey, the District of Massachusetts.
	But the other question was, or could you limit it to just the plaintiffs in these particular cases?
	Remember that two of these three cases are brought by states.
	So how this changes that result, what does it mean then when the individual person
	plaintiffs who have standing to sue are states does that mean that we're going to get sort of a patchwork result as one of the attorneys general matt platkin of new jersey described to me in an interview earlier this year does that mean that citizenship could be conferred solely by an accident of birth and he described to me a situation where citizen or a resident of his state gives birth over a state line in Pennsylvania for example what happens if a New Jersey resident gives birth in Pennsylvania New
	Jersey is a plaintiff to these cases Pennsylvania is not if the child to two undocumented immigrants is born in Pennsylvania.
	What is the result with respect to that person's citizenship?
	These are a bunch of questions that are now going to result.
	But at the very least, we are going to see a circumstance where the president's executive order curtailing birthright citizenship is going to effectively be allowed to be implemented in certain states, but not in others.
	What?
	I don't even understand what the hell she's talking about.
	I'm not sure if that, Alex, I'm not sure if that lib was super salty, but what, you know, whatever.
	All right.
	Strange.
	They're having a meltdown on MSNBC.
	You know that's a good day for you.
	And ladies and gentlemen, to end this program and send you off into the weekend right, we have a perfect verse of the day for you today.
	Let's rock and roll.
	The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness does not overcome it.
	John 1, 5.
	A beautiful day of victory.
	I can't wait to go and read a little bit more about this in the Supreme Court.
	It's like hard to, you know, it's hard to absorb it all live on air.
	It's awesome.
	I'm going to go do some research.
	We'll get ripping our recordings and get up with breaking news content for you.
	Ladies and gentlemen, it is always our honor to deliver the news to you in this, the greatest country on earth.
	And we hope you have a spectacular weekend.
	May God be with you.
	And remember, ladies and gentlemen, the light shines in the darkness, but the darkness does not overcome it.
	And in the end, we win.
	It's your boy Benny.
	See ya.
	What do we want?
	Communism!
	And when do we want it?
	You want it now!
	Yeah!
	Now!
	And who should we vote for?
	Me!
	Vote for me!
	The biggest ships in the sea, all owned by the oldest kings, and a dying legacy, media dill weeks.
	So will the Benny show come to mind the salt and lives for fun?
	Be the gold and bring the gun, we sail for number one Soon will the penny show come to mine the salt from Lids for fun.
	Leave the gold and bring the gun.
	We sail for number one.

▲