All Episodes
May 29, 2025 - The Benny Show - Benny Johnson
44:59
🚨 White House Press Briefing LIVE Right Now: Karoline Leavitt TORCHING Fake News to Their FACES
Participants
Main voices
b
benny johnson
09:05
k
karoline leavitt
24:12
Appearances
Clips
k
kash patel
00:19
p
peter doocy
00:43
s
sandra smith
00:42
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
kash patel
As a result of that beachside venture from the former director, do you know how many agents I've had to take offline from chasing down child sex predators, fentanyl traffickers, terrorists, because everywhere across this country, people are popping up on social media and think that a threat to the life of the president of the United States is a joke?
unidentified
Wow.
The former director was interviewed by Secret Service investigators the day after making the now-deleted post.
Not a yes, sir.
Not a follower.
Fit the box, fit the mold, have a seat.
Oh yeah.
Take a number.
I was lightning before the thunder.
Thunder, thunder.
Lightning and the thunder.
Yeah.
benny johnson
What's up, guys?
unidentified
I love that cold!
benny johnson
I love that cold.
It just works.
It just works so well.
And ladies and gentlemen, here we go.
We're going to be working very well with Caroline Levitt today again live at the White House.
Everyone has done their stand-ups.
We got you Peter Doocy's stand-up to set the table for us.
We love just going live.
Just letting her rip, right?
You never know what you're going to see.
And it seems like every single time that we don't take, like, President Trump live from the Oval Office or the administration live, that something absolutely epic happens and we end up having to cover it anyway.
So we might as well just be live, right?
That's like the decision that we make.
So fresh off of the morning show, two and a half hours of morning show, we just let her rip.
Man, some of those clips are going viral already.
We'll see.
There's so very much to talk about.
I have a sinking suspicion that James Comey and the drive to lock up James Comey is going to be a big question today.
Now, here you have some of the reporters.
They're standing up.
I guess someone's getting seated there.
But what you're always looking for here is all of the front row seated.
Those are the cable news networks.
As we talk about it, you can kind of like read the room.
We don't know who the special chair, social media chair, is today.
We know it's not us.
Don't worry.
We got something cooking, okay, with this.
But there is obviously going to be quite a few questions about the Cash Petel and Dan Bogino interviews.
Those seem to be the driving forces of the news cycle and certainly a driving force for us.
It's what we predicated our morning show on.
It still is quizzling, I guess.
As to some of the things that Dan Bogino said this morning on Fox and then Kash Patel said last night on Fox.
Both of them still assert that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.
And now that they're going to release video footage to prove that, or at least to prove that he was like alone in his cell when Jeffrey Epstein definitely didn't kill himself.
So I guess we'll see.
Ladies and gentlemen, they're also going to ask some questions about James Comey.
There's got to be questions about Comey.
It's got to be.
Because this is like the lead of the Daily Mail right now.
My window, please climb.
James Comey issued an assassination attempt against Donald Trump.
That's what 8647 is.
Everyone knows what that is, but especially a guy who dealt with criminal elements in this country and the mob and so on.
He knows what it is.
Cash for sale last night says that there have been a skyrocketing number of assassination attempts against Donald Trump.
Now, we know of five.
Five assassination attempts against the president.
There have been multiple arrests.
One dude from Wisconsin that planned on blowing up a Trump rally.
Obviously, Ryan Ralph, who stood outside of Trump's golf course with a firearm.
Then there's the Butler, Butler, Pennsylvania.
That guy's no longer, you know, Matthew Thomas Crooks.
Not with us.
We just got a two-minute warning from the White House.
Okay, so we got to rush through this.
We know that President Trump was following.
You've never heard about these kind of things.
We know that President Trump was followed by a mysterious drone that they had to shoot out of the sky.
Do you know this?
That they were blowing drones out of the sky?
Do you know that's why the inauguration was indoors?
They were too scared of a massive coordinated AI drone attack on Donald Trump.
That's why they moved everything indoors.
They were too scared about it.
Ladies and gentlemen, the new media seat is being seated right now.
Is it Molly Hemingway?
I don't know.
Anyway, the point is that we know of five.
Five direct assassination attempts on Donald Trump.
Now, James Comey, of course, posting 8647 is inspiring a ton of copycats.
That's what Cash Patel said in our cold.
So Cash Patel said, I have to devote enormous amounts of manpower in order to get assurances that these threats are followed up with, right, against Donald Trump.
FBI Director Cash Patel says the Bureau has been overwhelmed by copycat threats against Donald Trump's life, including one from a criminal alien that just broke.
The new guy was just arrested.
Criminal alien was arrested.
Threatening to kill Donald Trump.
Okay, well, play stupid games, stupid prizes.
The Teletoon Fox News' Brett Baier, former FBI director's post, which showed seashells arranged in the numbers, forced him to redirect resources to critics who followed suit.
The term 86 is often used to get rid of something, and it's also used by criminal elements to say, kill someone.
And you know how many copycats we've had to investigate.
Patel grew frustrated when he said he had to deal with this every single day.
He believes Comey thought it was funny to share the post.
The FBI did not immediately respond to requests from the Daily Mail for the details of the threat to Trump's life.
But it comes after two assassination attempts.
There have been five assassination attempts.
The fifth one, of course, coming from an Iranian element that was openly coordinating with people in prisons across America that the FBI has just Distributed information on that.
So there's been five that we know of off of the top of the dome, assassinations against Trump.
And so this is the leading story today.
Patel spoke the day after Comey appeared on CNN to trash Patel's directorship, where he said this guy is literally nothing in his entire adult life that prepares him for this role.
Well, he was chief staff for the Defense Department, which is seven years.
He was the chief of staff for the Pentagon.
So actually, arguably, he's done more than what a standard FBI director would do.
Comey added that he feels a bit sorry for Patel and compared him to a dog.
Patel told Brett Baer he has no problem with Comey criticizing him.
This comes as Patel, who's a frequent critic of the FBI, before he's tapped to lead it, rapidly reshaped the Bureau.
This is, again, like, very interesting.
I don't know if we have time to play it.
Why not just try it?
We're going to break in.
We'll break in if Caroline Lovett takes the stage.
But here's a good example of what Kapschel is talking about.
A criminal alien saying he's going to kill Donald Trump.
sandra smith
Illegal migrant now in custody after allegedly writing that he'll self-deport after shooting President Trump in a letter that he sent to an ICE agent.
The 54-year-old Mexican national has illegally entered the U.S. at least nine times and has a lengthy rap sheet.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem reacting in a statement saying, quote, thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars.
All politicians and members of the media should take notice of these repeated attempts on President Trump's life and tone down their rhetoric.
I will continue to take all measures necessary to ensure the protection of President Trump.
benny johnson
So, ladies and gentlemen, now with your comments on screen, sorry about that.
We have confirmation that at the very least the FBI is considering prosecutions here in the FBI.
The FBI doesn't prosecute.
DOJ prosecutes.
Obviously, the FBI is working in concert with the DOJ and can give them evidence that makes it impossible to not prosecute.
I mean, you can really bring major heat on these issues.
Check out something very interesting to show me.
Get me that Andy Ogles tweet from this morning.
We went kind of hard on one of our guests this morning, Andy Ogles, and he's a member of Congress, and we were like, why the hell don't you have any of these assassination documents?
And lo and behold, the member of like he's out tweeting today, like he tweets right afterwards.
And here's Caroline Levitt, ladies and gentlemen, live on the program.
karoline leavitt
Anyway, the point is that these questions have last night, the Trump administration faced another example of judicial overreach.
Using his full and proper legal authority, President Trump imposed universal tariffs and reciprocal tariffs on Liberation Day to address the extraordinary threats to our national security and economy posed by large and persistent annual U.S. goods trade deficits.
The United States has run a trade deficit of goods every year since 1975.
One trillion dollars.
Everybody agrees this is unacceptable.
President Trump is delivering on his promise to fix this problem, and he has taken a long overdue and much-needed bold stance for American workers after decades of our manufacturing base being hollowed out.
The president's rationale for imposing these powerful tariffs was legally sound and grounded in common sense.
President Trump correctly believes that America cannot function safely long term if we are unable to scale advanced domestic manufacturing capacity, have our own secure critical supply chains and our defense industrial base is dependent on foreign adversaries.
Three judges of the U.S. Court of International Trade disagreed and brazenly abused their judicial power to usurp the authority of President Trump to stop him from carrying out the mandate that the American people gave him.
These judges failed to acknowledge that the President of the United States has core foreign affairs powers and authority given to him by Congress to protect the United States economy and national security.
Congress had created the National Emergency Act to provide the congressional framework to strike down improper IEPA use.
And any questions over whether President Trump improperly imposed these IEPA tariffs were already adjudicated in Congress following Liberation Day.
Congress firmly rejected an effort led by Senator Rand Paul and Democrats to terminate the president's reciprocal tariffs.
The courts should have no role here.
There is a troubling and dangerous trend of unelected judges inserting themselves into the presidential decision-making process.
America cannot function if President Trump, or any other president for that matter, has their sensitive diplomatic or trade negotiations railroaded by activist judges.
President Trump is in the process of rebalancing America's trading agreements with the entire world, bringing tens of billions of dollars in tariff revenues to our country, and finally ending the United States of America from being ripped off.
These judges are threatening to undermine the credibility of the United States on the world stage.
The administration has already filed an emergency motion for a stay pending appeal and an immediate administrative stay to strike down this egregious decision.
But ultimately, the Supreme Court must put an end to this for the sake of our Constitution and our country.
With Congress returning next week, it's critical that Senate Republicans maintain the momentum and quickly pass the One Big Beautiful Bill.
The One Big Beautiful Bill will truly make America safe and prosperous.
The One Big Beautiful Bill includes the largest border security investment ever.
That's why the law enforcement groups are lining up to encourage its swift passage.
The National Fraternal Order of the Constitution in the country just endorsed key provisions of the bill.
It is a promise kept to the public safety officers across the country and a bold step toward an economy that respects, rewards, and uplifts the people who keep it safe.
And the National Border Patrol Council, which represents nearly 20,000 Border Patrol agents, hailed the legislation as well.
The group's president said this legislation provides a once-in-a-generation investment in the border security of our great country and will make America safer.
The One Big Beautiful bill will guarantee we can permanently have the safest, strongest, and most secure immigration system in American history.
I also want to take the opportunity to debunk some false claims that have been circulating in the press about this bill.
The blatantly wrong claim that the one big beautiful bill increases the deficit is based on the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers who use shoddy assumptions and have historically been terrible at forecasting across Democrat and Republican administrations alike.
For example, just before Congress enacted the original Trump tax cuts at the end of 2017, the same CBO projected that growth would average a mere 1.9% over the next 10 years.
However, by 2019, actual growth had surged to 3.4% once the Trump tax cuts went into effect, exceeding the CBO forecast by nearly two full percentage points.
The CBO's latest forecast makes the same anemic growth assumptions as they did in 2017, missing the impact of the One Big Beautiful bill.
The CBO assumes long-term GDP growth of an anemic 1.8%, and that is absurd.
The American economy is going to boom like never before after the one big, beautiful bill is passed.
The largest middle-class tax cut in history, massive deregulation, and the most aggressive domestic energy exploration ever will fuel small businesses, further boost private investment, increase workers' wages, and supercharge economic growth.
The Council of Economic Advisors has factored in the effects of all these pro-growth policies and estimated in their own analysis that growth will average 3% in the long run after the one big beautiful bill is passed, which is nearly double the ridiculous CBO projection.
This higher growth would result in $4.1 trillion in additional revenue over the next 10 years.
Between the common-sense spending reforms contained in the One Big Beautiful Bill and the robust economic growth that will be generated as a result of it, there will be no increase to the deficit.
The same analysis from the CEA shows just how this historic package will unleash prosperity and ignite a blue-collar boom across America.
But if the radical Democrats get their way and the One Big Beautiful Bill does not pass, Americans will face a whopping $4 trillion tax hike.
This is unacceptable to President Trump.
President Trump will not allow Democrats to massively raise Americans' taxes.
Senate Republicans must get this bill passed.
Failure is not an option.
The American people are counting on us, on Republicans, to deliver.
In other news, despite all the doom casting from the media, Americans are growing more and more optimistic about the economy under this president.
Consumer confidence surged in May, with the biggest monthly jump in four years, smashing expectations.
According to the release from the Consumer Confidence Index, the increase in confidence was broad-based across all age groups, income groups, and political affiliations.
Our country is clearly heading in the right direction under President Trump's bold leadership.
For the first time in history of Rasmussen polling, a majority of Americans believe the country is on the right track.
It's unsurprising because the president is fulfilling the promises he made to the American people.
Here in our new media seat today, we have the editor-in-chief of The Federalist, Molly Hemingway.
The Federalist is led by Molly and Sean Davis and provides fearless journalism and coverage of politics and culture to millions of readers all over the world.
Thank you for being here, Molly, and why don't you please kick us off?
Thank you.
unidentified
In the first Trump administration, there was an effort to stymie the agenda of Trump through the Russia collusion hoax perpetuated by many people in the media, including some people seated here and other Democrats as well.
The second Trump administration, to reference what you said at the beginning, seems to be subject to an effort to stymie the agenda using rogue lower court judges.
You mentioned that the Supreme Court could and should do something to rein in these lower court judges.
Also, Congress could do something about it.
But they don't seem terribly interested in it.
It also seems there's not much of an actual coordinated effort from this White House to take and tackle this effort from judges, Democrats and other people using these judges, to stymie the agenda.
Is there an actual effort by this White House to tackle this issue in a comprehensive way?
And if so, what is it?
karoline leavitt
There is an effort by this administration to tackle these rogue judges and the injunctions and the blockades that we have in our broken judicial system.
In every case.
I mean, we have seen time and time again these lower district court judges ruling against this administration and the president's basic executive authority and powers.
And this administration is fighting every single one of those battles in court, including already the block that came down from the tariff court, the IEPA court last night.
And on my way out here to the briefing room, I understand that there was another district court judge right here in Washington, D.C., who ruled against the president's tariff power.
Get to the heart of your question, and I'm glad that we are addressing this in the room today, because nationwide injunctions ordered against the first Trump administration, Trump 1.0, account for more than half of the injunctions issued in this country since 1963.
And President Trump had more injunctions in one full month of office in February than Joe Biden had in three years.
And let me roll through some of these radical injunctions to paint the picture for the American people at home.
These are not just talking points.
These are real judges in the court of law who are trying to block the president's power and the policies that he was elected to enact.
For example: A court ordered the Trump administration to return already deported terrorist aliens back to the United States.
A court has ruled the Trump administration can't even temporarily pause our refugee programs.
Courts prohibited the Trump administration from eliminating federal funding for child transgender surgery and mutilation, a practice that the American people overwhelmingly reject.
A court also held that the Trump administration could not ban people experiencing gender dysphoria or mental health issues from serving in the military.
Ridiculous.
Courts prohibited the removal of transgender women from women's prisons despite potential physical harm to real women in those prisons, biological women.
A Northern District of California judge issued an absurd ruling that the president cannot fire people within the executive branch without Congress passing a bill, even though Congress has expressly authorized the president through the Office of Personnel Management to authorize reductions in force across agencies.
A court also ordered the Trump administration to rehire thousands of already fired employees in several cases.
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from defunding the Department of Education.
Another signature campaign promised that this president has the power to implement.
Courts ordered the Trump administration could not eliminate funding for illegal DEI programs, hence the word illegal.
These are illegal programs to begin with, and now the courts are trying to say this president can't roll them back.
And a district court judge prohibited the president from issuing any categorical funding freezes.
And then another court ordered on top of that, the administration makes $2 billion of payments in 36 hours.
These are just a few of the ridiculous, Stephen Miller says it's judicial tyranny.
unidentified
Some people are calling it a judicial coup.
You're saying you're responding to each and every one of these actions, efforts by these judges to delay or thwart the implementation of the agenda.
But is there going to be anything more than that?
Or is it just going to let this operation continue, even though it could delay everything for years until the presidency is over?
karoline leavitt
The administration is operating under the directive given from the president that we need to comply with the court's orders.
He's made that very clear, but we're going to fight them in court and we're going to win on the merits of these cases because we know.
No, we are acting within the president's legal and executive authorities.
And thanks for being here.
Gabe.
unidentified
Thank you, Caroline.
Question on tariffs, but first actually some foreign policy news, some breaking news.
Some local Israeli media is reporting that Prime Minister Netanyahu told hostage families that he's accepted a 60-day truce offer.
So can you confirm have Israel Hamas agree to the truth?
karoline leavitt
I can confirm that Israel signed off on this proposal before it was sent to Hamas.
I can also confirm that those discussions are continuing, and we hope that a ceasefire in Gaza will take place so we can return all of the hostages home, and that's been a priority from this administration from the beginning.
I won't comment further as we are in the midst of this right now.
unidentified
So to be clear, you don't know if Hamas has accepted it yet?
karoline leavitt
Not to my knowledge, but certainly if that becomes case and this ceasefire goes into effect, you'll hear it directly from myself, the president, or Special Envoy Wyckoff.
unidentified
And he said that trade deal negotiations would continue.
Why would other countries continue these trade deal negotiations?
karoline leavitt
Because other countries around the world have faith in the negotiator in chief.
President Donald J. Trump.
And they also probably see how ridiculous this ruling is, and they understand that the administration is going to win, and we intend to win.
We already filed an emergency appeal.
We expect to fight this battle all the way to the Supreme Court.
These other countries should also know, and they do know, that the president reserves other tariff authorities, Section 232, for example, to ensure that America's interests are being restored around the world.
But I can confirm that our ambassador for trade, Jameson Greer, already heard from countries around the world this morning.
peter doocy
Thank you, Caroline.
So many of the president's plans right now are being blocked by courts.
If the courts are going to be the ones who are shaping policy, does the president wish he would have just become a judge instead?
karoline leavitt
I think the president would take this job over being a judge, and certainly the president is acting within his authority.
He wishes judges would do the same.
peter doocy
So the courts are basically telling you guys, they think that the White House's policies, the president's policies, are in some way against the law.
So why can't President Trump ask the Republicans that control the House and the Republicans that control the Senate just to make a new law?
karoline leavitt
Well, these laws have already been granted to the president by the Constitution and by laws that have been previously passed.
I'll give you another example.
For instance, we've been blocked in court for the revocation of visas from individuals who have the privilege of studying in the United States of America.
Secretary of State Rubio has simply used his authority to revoke those visas, to revoke that privilege.
And we've seen the courts try to block that.
So if these judges want to be the Secretary of State or they want to be the president, they can run.
peter doocy
Is the president satisfied with AIDS?
Only sitting for these transcribed interviews, or would he also like to see some kind of testimony from the former First Lady, Dr. Biden?
karoline leavitt
I think, frankly, the former First Lady should certainly speak up about what she saw in regards to her husband.
And when she saw it and what she knew.
Because I think anybody looking, again, at the videos and photo evidence of Joe Biden with your own eyes and a little bit of common sense can see this was a clear cover-up.
And Jill Biden was certainly complicit in that cover-up.
There's documentation, video evidence of her clearly shielding her husband away from the cameras.
They were just on The View last week.
She was saying everything is fine.
She's still lying to the American people.
She still thinks the American public are so stupid that they're going to believe her lies.
And frankly, it's insulting and she needs to answer for it.
Ouija.
unidentified
Caroline, President Trump was asked what he thought about Elon Musk's claim that the big, beautiful bill increases the budget deficit and undermines the work of Doge.
And the president didn't actually comment on those remarks.
He just talked about the need to support the bill.
So what does the president think about what Elon Musk said?
karoline leavitt
Well, the president is very proud of the one big, beautiful bill, and he wants to see it pass.
He wants the Senate to get to work on it and send it to his desk as quickly as possible.
First, as you know, Elon Musk announced last night his departure as an official special government employee from the Trump administration.
We thank him for his service.
We thank him for getting Doge off of the ground, and the efforts to cut waste, fraud, and abuse will continue.
unidentified
Musk saying it adds to the deficit and it undermines all his work.
karoline leavitt
The president commented on this.
I commented on it.
I told you that this bill saves $1.6 trillion, according to the Council of Economic Advisors, and the analyses that the president believes in.
So he gave a comment.
I give a comment.
Just because you don't like that comment doesn't mean it's not a comment.
Rachel.
unidentified
Back on trade.
I know you said the White House is going to fight this ruling in court.
Is the administration actively reviewing other avenues, other options to carry out the president's trade policy?
karoline leavitt
We will comply with the court orders.
But yes, the president has other legal authorities where he can implement tariffs.
However, it does not dispute the fact that the president was right to declare a national emergency when it came to fentanyl and when also when it came to our crippling deficits and the lack of critical supply chains here at home.
That is the reasoning for the president's tariffs.
And the court didn't dispute those facts, by the way.
And there have been other courts that have reaffirmed the president's position.
In fact, a ruling in federal court earlier this month shows that the administration is in the right, said we will win on appeal.
A federal district judge in Florida ruled that IEPA, in fact, does grant the president the authority to unilaterally impose tariffs.
And 20 years ago, I will add, they are not a court, the New York Times editorial board responded to the January 2005 trade deficit of $58.3 billion by writing an editorial entitled Dangerous Deficits.
And since then, our trade deficit has more than doubled.
The U.S. trade deficit in January totaled a whopping $131.4 billion.
So people on both sides of the aisle, pundits.
Lawyers, legal scholars, politicians have all agreed that it is a national emergency, our trade deficits, and our lack of critical supply chains here at home.
It's just President Trump was the first president to actually act on it, to restore that wealth and that prosperity to the United States of America.
And it's very unfortunate that the courts are now blocking his attempt to do that.
unidentified
So has the administration then reached the point where you are actually asking your economic advisors to start reviewing other avenues to implement the president's trade policy, or do you want to just see this legal process take place for now?
karoline leavitt
We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
We are doing both.
unidentified
Josh.
The president met with the Fed chair earlier today.
I'm wondering if you can give us any readout of that meeting.
The Fed also says that they discussed the economy.
karoline leavitt
I imagine the president might have shared views on rates as well, but one thing that Sure, I can share with you that we saw, the president and I both saw the statement that the Fed put out after the meeting.
That statement is correct.
However, the president did say that he believes the Fed chair is making a mistake by not lowering interest rates, which is putting us at an economic disadvantage to China and other countries.
And the president's been very vocal about that, both publicly and now I can reveal privately as well.
unidentified
Speak at all about his plans for that position, but whether he would seek to move Jay Powell out of that position or keep him in until his term ends.
karoline leavitt
Yeah.
unidentified
Okay.
Very quickly on the tariff question.
You mentioned section 232 earlier.
Are you suggesting that you might sort of speed up some of the existing 232 investigations?
Or are you talking potentially using 232 as a replacement power if this ruling doesn't go your way?
karoline leavitt
I'm just simply stating the fact that the president has other legal authorities he can use to implement tariffs, and the administration is willing to use those.
As you know, we already have applied Section 232 tariffs on specific industries.
Yes, thank you.
unidentified
President Trump says that you needed one and a half to two weeks to determine whether or not you believed Vladimir Putin wanted peace.
He has been in office now for four months.
What does he believe is going to happen in the next one and a half to two weeks that would change his opinion?
karoline leavitt
Well, it is my understanding and it is our hope that Russia and Ukraine will engage in direct talks and negotiations next week in Istanbul.
And we believe that meeting is going to take place.
And that is a meeting the president encouraged and urged for these two sides to come together and negotiate directly.
And the president has been clear from the very beginning of this conflict that he wants to see this conflict solved on the negotiating table.
Well, not on the battlefield.
And he's told that to both leaders, again, both publicly and privately.
So hopefully next week it will move the ball forward.
unidentified
Is the United States going to participate in those conversations?
karoline leavitt
We will let you know if the president plans to send a representative.
I'm not tracking that at this time.
Kelly, in the back.
unidentified
Thanks, Caroline.
karoline leavitt
Sure.
unidentified
I wanted to just clarify once and for all, the Qatari jet, the sail, or the gift, because the Qatari government is asking the U.S. to clarify that the jet's pending transfer was initiated.
karoline leavitt
The amount of questions we've received, and we've been incredibly clear, and I have answered this, the President has answered this, the Department of Defense has answered this.
This is a government-to-government gift transfer from the Qataris to the Department of Defense to the United States Air Force.
It is now in their hands, and for further details on where that stands, I would defer you to the Department of Defense and the United States Air Force.
I have nothing more for you on that.
Deanna.
unidentified
Caroline, two questions, one on the beautiful bill, one on immigration.
Yesterday, Trump said we'll be negotiating that bill, and I'm not happy about certain aspects of it, but I'm thrilled by other aspects of it.
Wondering if you could, you know, share any specifics on that.
And in immigration, do you know how many illegal migrants have taken Trump's voucher program so far and have deported themselves?
karoline leavitt
I believe it's in the thousands of those who have chosen the way, the easier route of self-deportation.
And we certainly encourage all illegal aliens who are present within our homeland to take that option.
It's a much more pleasant option than being deported.
And we will deport you if you're here illegally.
That's our intention.
As for the first question the president was speaking about, is how this is a great bill.
However, it has come as a result of a hard negotiation.
Difficult to get things done on Capitol Hill, but thanks to President Trump, this bill is moving in the right direction.
And thanks to House Republicans and the leadership over there as well, who did a great job mediating both sides of the caucus to move this bill to the Senate.
And now the president, again, has told his friends on the Senate side and is already engaged in those conversations to get that bill back to his desk as soon as possible.
Sure.
unidentified
Has this administration been briefed about the incident that happened in Gaza on Tuesday during the rollout of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution of aid to Palestinians there?
And should there be a ceasefire?
Will this administration continue to rely on this foundation for the distribution of aid to civilians?
karoline leavitt
What incident are you referring to?
When the aid was rolled out to Gaza for the first time in many months and meals and food was given to hungry people thanks to President Trump.
Yes, we were briefed on that plan.
The president was the reason that that aid went into Gaza and he got the Israelis to support that plan.
Add that the previous administration rejected such a plan to ensure that these starving and devastated people in the Gaza Strip were given humanitarian aid and assistance.
And it was the previous administration that tried to build this pier, if you all remember it.
It was brought to my attention this morning, and I thought, that's a good point.
Why don't I bring that up?
Because there's been so much criticism.
In fact, it was on the front page of a newspaper this morning about the criticism for this president having a humanitarian heart and giving people badly needed food and supplies.
Nobody wanted to talk about how the previous administration failed in that endeavor.
They built this pier that cost $230 million.
It lasted about 20 days, and more than 60 U.S. service members were injured as a part of this floating aid pier that did nothing for the people of Gaza.
The president is opening up his humanitarian heart to get aid into the region while his team simultaneously negotiates a ceasefire and the return of all hostages.
We are moving the ball forward in a positive direction.
For all people, the president wants to see peace for all people.
Jasmine.
unidentified
Thanks so much, Caroline.
A notice investigation found that the Hallmark Maha Commission report that was released last week cites studies that appear to not exist.
We know that because, in part, we reached out to some of the listed authors who said that they didn't write the studies cited.
So I want to ask, does the White House have confidence that the information coming from HHS can be trusted?
karoline leavitt
Yes, we have complete confidence in Secretary Kennedy and his team at HHS.
I understand there were some formatting issues with the Maha Can you talk about what tools or research goes into production of these kinds of reports?
unidentified
For instance, is it AI that's used to put together these reports now?
karoline leavitt
I can't speak to that.
I would defer you to the Department of Health and Human Services.
What I know is just what I told you.
Lindsay.
unidentified
Thank you, Caroline.
Many small businesses that we've talked to since the tariffs have been in place have said what would really help them is a long-term plan so that they can catch up.
In light of what's happened now, this trade war with the courts, How will that impact this 90-day window?
Will you guys be adjusting that?
And how can you help relieve some of these small businesses?
karoline leavitt
Well, I would say nobody understands the needs of business owners and nobody has the backs of our small business community more than President Donald J. Trump.
He believes I've heard him talk.
And that's why the president is supporting the one big beautiful bill.
So for those you spoke to who are asking for a long-term plan, No tax on tips, no tax on overtime for their workers.
More money in their pockets.
Their bottom lines will be larger.
They can pay their people more.
Wages are going to go up.
Inflation will continue to come down.
We've already seen energy prices plummeting as a result of this president's economic and energy agenda that he has been implementing across the federal government, reducing burdensome regulation.
All of that is good news for small business owners across the country.
That's why they strongly support the president.
That's the Trump economic plan that is underway.
And again, you're emphasizing, I believe, the need to pass the one big beautiful bill, and the president wants to see that happen.
unidentified
Will you still work within that 90-day window for these trade negotiations?
karoline leavitt
Again, as far as we're concerned, our trade agenda is moving forward, and we've already heard from countries around the world today who will continue to negotiate in good faith with the United States so we can cut good trade deals on behalf of the American people, and we fully expect to win this case in court.
Sure.
unidentified
On Golden Dome, the president put out this number of $61 billion.
How did he arrive at that?
Is that the number it will cost to protect Canada?
And is it negotiable?
Or where did it come from?
karoline leavitt
I can certainly ask the president and I can check in with our research team and we'll get you the facts on that number.
But the Golden Dome is certainly a significant investment in our nation's national security and homeland security to protect Americans, all of you in this room, from future threats.
unidentified
Have the Canadians been talking in good faith about it?
karoline leavitt
Well, the president has certainly expressed to the Canadians how we are essentially subsidizing their national defense.
He brought it up in his meeting with their new leader here.
And as you know, we'll be traveling to Canada next month for the G7.
So I expect that topic of discussion to come up on that trip as well.
unidentified
Sure.
Hi, thanks Caroline.
There was a May Day USA rally in Seattle that happened over the weekend that devolved into some protests and riots.
The Seattle Mayor, Harold, said that it was a far right rally held here to provoke a reaction by promoting beliefs that are inherently opposed to our I know the FBI is looking at this, but has the president reached out to the mayor at all, asked him to apologize for this?
And is this something that the administration would consider an example of anti-Christian bias?
karoline leavitt
I'm not aware of that case.
I know the FBI is looking into it, but I'm not aware of any phone calls the president may or may not have made to the mayor of that city.
unidentified
And then on Doge, we know that Elon Musk is leaving.
Do you have an updated leadership structure for who is leading the group?
Is RestVote involved?
And what is its new mission now, if any?
karoline leavitt
Well, the entire cabinet is involved.
And I spoke to the president about it this morning.
And the entire cabinet understands the need to cut government waste, fraud, and abuse.
And each cabinet secretary at their respective agencies is committed to that.
That's why they were working hand-in-hand with Elon Musk.
And they'll continue to work with the respective Doge employees who have onboarded as political appointees at all of these agencies.
So surely the mission of Doge will continue.
And many Doge employees are now political appointees and employees of our government.
And to the best of my knowledge, all of them intend to stay and continue to support.
unidentified
important work.
Is there a Doge leader taking the place of Mr. Musk?
karoline leavitt
Again, the Doge leaders are each and every member of the president's cabinet and the president himself who is wholeheartedly committed to cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our government.
Michael.
unidentified
Thank you, Caroline.
There's conflicting reports out of the Middle East right now.
Saudi television network Al-Arabia is saying that Israel and Hamas have agreed to a 60-day ceasefire.
Sources with Hamas are saying that has not been agreed to.
If and when that does happen, will we expect to hear something from President Trump announcing that?
karoline leavitt
As I said earlier, yes, indeed.
If there is an announcement to be made, it will come from the White House, the President, myself, or Special Envoy Whitcoff.
unidentified
Caroline, one big, beautiful bill.
The president says he's not happy with all aspects of it.
What changes would he like to see be made?
And can this bill be both big and beautiful?
karoline leavitt
It is a one big, beautiful bill, as the name rings true.
And the president, as I said, is currently working with his friends in the Senate who have some recommendations for the bill.
Those negotiations and discussions are continuing.
President's ultimate priority is to get this bill back to his desk for signature.
And the president's priorities in this bill are non-negotiable in terms of the tax priorities he wants to see and the large tax cuts in the border investments that are currently in this bill.
He is not going to allow them to go away for the American people.
Sure, go ahead.
unidentified
Yes, I wanted to ask you about, has the president spoken to any of these foreign leaders about These agreements have been reached, specifically the case of the United Kingdom that already has an agreement in place after this decision of the court in New York.
karoline leavitt
Has the president talked to foreign leaders about what?
unidentified
About the court decision in New York.
karoline leavitt
Which court decision in New York?
unidentified
The trade court.
karoline leavitt
Oh, the trade court decision.
He did speak to the leader of Japan this morning, and he said that was a very good call and a good discussion.
And as I said, the president's cabinet, Secretary Lutnik, Secretary Besant, and Ambassador Jameson Greer have all been in touch with their counterparts in countries around the world to let them know the United States will still be at the negotiating table, and we still expect countries around the world to treat us fairly.
Again, I will just close by saying that How ridiculous it is that we have been ripped off.
Our middle class has been hollowed out.
Our manufacturing base has left and gone overseas.
Jobs have been offshored.
And now no court did anything about that.
No court did anything about hundreds of thousands of people being put out of work, about thousands of factories being closed down, about our deficits going to dangerous levels, as the New York Times has said.
But now a court is trying to stop a president from trying to correct those wrongs of the past.
And this administration will continue.
It's a promise the President made to the American people, and it's a promise they elected him on.
We will win this battle in court, and the President will implement his America First trade policies.
Thank you, everyone.
I can tell you the President greatly looks forward to going to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he will discuss this historic deal and discuss American jobs and American steel, and we hope to see you all there.
Thanks, guys.
benny johnson
All right.
Carolyn Levitt feisty today.
You can tell.
They're pissed off at these rulings.
not something to laugh about.
I don't like...
put cancer right back into Joe Biden, right?
If Donald Trump ended all war, If Donald Trump ended the nuclear program in Iran, a federal judge would order that President Trump hand them nukes.
It is total and complete judicial tyranny.
Clearly don't have a country.
If a judge, any judge, could just overrule the president every single step that they make.
What's the point of the executive?
Peter Ducey asking a great question.
Why didn't Donald Trump just run to be a judge if this is where all the power lies?
The courts are wildly out of step and need to be smacked down hard by the Supreme Court.
The only way this works is if the Supreme Court is able to stop being short-order cooks for leftists and start delivering on their constitutionally restricted bounds, which is obviously Donald Trump lives within the confines of the laws.
That are inside of the Constitution and that Congress passes.
They abide by that and the courts chill out, right?
This is us asking the questions.
Here we go.
This is what we were going to preview.
This is from earlier this morning.
The deep state is real, says Andy Ogles.
We need to find out everything about the Trump assassin.
Did they act alone?
There's a laundry list.
This is us kind of going a little hot there.
But you know what?
This is how you make positive change.
This is the kind of question that we want to ask at the White House, Carolyn Levitt.
Donald Trump's tariffs were overturned.
The Constitution explicitly says that the President can tariff.
It's there in the Constitution.
So yeah, they have every right to be pissed at the White House.
We're pissed as American people.
We're fighting.
We're fighting with you.
We're fighting right there.
And we'll be fighting tomorrow morning when we're live again for our show at 10 a.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Please join us.
It's your boy Benny.
We're gonna win.
See ya.
unidentified
Not a yes sir, not a follower.
Fit the box, fit the mold, have a seat for ya.
Take a number, I was lightning before the thunder.
Thunder, thunder.
Lightning and the thunder.
Thunder, feel the thunder.
Who do you think you are?
Dreaming about being a big star.
This is the show where the truth gon'be.
Faith and freedom on your TV screen.
Stand up strong, battle through the night.
The Benny shows here bringing liberty to life.
From the speeches to the debates, Benny sharp like a blade.
Covered through the lies, watch the truth cascade.
This man never fades.
You know it's primetime when Benny invades.
From saving the nation to stories untold.
The Benny Show's a storm, see the truth unfold.
Stay in the loop, let freedom take hold.
Salt on all the libs, soul never sold.
It's the Benny Show, where the truth gon' be.
Faith and freedom on your TV screen.
Stand up strong, battle through the night.
The Benny Show's here bringing liberty to light.
Liberty to light.
Bringing liberty to light.
Liberty Delight.
Export Selection