Dan Bidondi Show - RI BLACKSTONE VALLEY TEA PARTY PART 2 Aired: 2010-04-18 Duration: 10:26 === Pension System Flaws (08:30) === [00:00:00] 10% of the people on medical assistance live right in Woonsocket, in this state. [00:00:05] And by trade, I'm a pharmacist. [00:00:09] And I've got so many stories of fraud and abuse in the welfare system. [00:00:14] It's incredible. [00:00:16] I was working in Woonsocket, and a woman on medical assistance wanted to get a six-month supply of their medicine. [00:00:24] And I told them, no, you can only get a month's supply at a time, and you can get a refill, so you have to come back every month. [00:00:30] She didn't like that idea, so she went home and called her social worker. [00:00:34] The social worker called me about an hour later and said, now you have to give her a six-month supply of her medicine. [00:00:40] So I did, and come to find out the reason she wanted a six-month supply of her medicine. [00:00:45] She was spending the winter in Hawaii. [00:00:48] And you paid for that. [00:00:53] The state employee pensions and job security. [00:00:57] When the E-1 government tries to cut state pensions, what happens is the guy at the top never gets hired. [00:01:05] It's always the last guy hired that's at the bottom that gets cut, because of funding. [00:01:10] So, even if you're making $100,000, you're totally incompetent, you probably don't even show up for work, You still can't get fired because you get bumped down to the $80,000 job. [00:01:20] The guy making $80,000 gets bumped down to the $60,000 job. [00:01:24] And it goes all the way down to the new guy that just got hired three months ago. [00:01:30] He's probably doing a great job and makes $26,000 a year. [00:01:34] There's no accountability. [00:01:35] Unions, it's almost impossible to hire somebody that's in a union. [00:01:42] There's no incentive to excel in the union. [00:01:44] There's no merit pay. [00:01:45] Everything, the whole, all unions are based on years service. [00:01:50] It doesn't matter whether you've been there two years, I mean, if you've been there two years and you're doing ten times as much work as the guy that's been there twenty years. [00:01:59] The guy that's been there twenty years is going to make more than you do. [00:02:02] It doesn't happen that way in the real world. [00:02:07] And we all know that Rhode Island's pension system is underfunded to the tune of like $3 billion, because what they do is they just don't pay into the system. [00:02:15] What they really need to do is change the whole pension system to like a 401 , where if so much comes out of a person's pay, it goes into an account with their name on it, and the state has to match that. [00:02:28] And then it's their money. [00:02:30] None of this nonsense about, no matter what happens to the investments, the taxpayers have to make up and guarantee that benefit that they're going to retire on. [00:02:40] Nobody can afford to do that. [00:02:41] I don't think there's a single company that has a private pension plan like that. [00:02:46] So we have to change from a defined benefit plan where they guarantee that 80% of their last three years pay. [00:02:53] And remember a few years back when the General Assembly changed, we voted constitutionally to change general offices for four years. [00:03:01] They said it was going to save money in campaigns. [00:03:04] It didn't save any money in campaigns. [00:03:06] The whole reason behind it is, once they get in power, they're there for four years, they can give their buddies those $80,000 and $100,000 a year jobs, then they retire based on the three years pay. [00:03:18] There's people that worked in the General Assembly when they were getting paid $300 a year, so they paid like $30 a year into the pension system. [00:03:29] And they get that $100,000 a year job for four or five years. [00:03:34] It's basically your pension is based on the last three years. [00:03:37] So there's people in Rhode Island collecting pensions. [00:03:39] They've paid probably $30,000 into the pension system, and they're collecting $70,000 pensions for life. [00:03:48] And that's-- it's just insane. [00:03:50] And not only that, people were living so much longer. [00:03:53] When Social Security was first set up, the average lifespan in the United States was 47 years old. [00:03:58] And they set the retirement age at 62. [00:04:03] And there were, I think there were 32 people working for every person that was collecting. [00:04:08] Now it's almost down to two to one. [00:04:11] So two people are working today, money comes out of their pay, goes right to somebody on Social Security. [00:04:18] Social Security is one of the biggest Ponzi schemes ever. [00:04:22] You would have been so much better off if the money went into a private investment of your own. [00:04:27] If they had done that with your money, your employees match, you would have ten times as much money. [00:04:33] So instead of getting that $1,200 a month check from Social Security, you get $12,000 in turn. [00:04:41] That's what would have happened if it would have been kept in an account with your name on it. [00:04:44] Social Security returns like a .9% return a year. [00:04:48] And nobody would stand for that. [00:04:49] The welfare state. [00:04:54] Since 1964, the United States has spent $7 trillion on anti-poverty programs. [00:04:59] Has it solved anything? [00:05:02] No. [00:05:02] Basically, before 1964, private charities took care of everybody that really needed help. [00:05:07] There was very little fraud, abuse, waste. [00:05:10] Because the people who really needed private charities, the Red Cross, churches, Salvation Army, they knew who needed help and who didn't. [00:05:18] But now we've just grown this huge bureaucracy of social welfare programs. [00:05:25] And they keep calling it a safety net. [00:05:26] It's more like a trampoline. [00:05:31] I mean, just... Could you take the microphone in your hand? [00:05:37] Can you step to the side of the river? [00:05:39] Yeah, we can't see the full screen. [00:05:42] Oh. [00:05:42] Thank you. [00:05:50] OK, I mean, this is part of the problem of the Obamacare plan. [00:05:54] Whenever anything's free, it's overused. [00:06:00] People will use something that's free. [00:06:02] I mean, have you ever gone to any kind of organization where they're handing out something free and let it not be used? [00:06:10] They're adding 30 million people to the rolls for healthcare. [00:06:14] And 30% of the doctors in the country say they're going to quit their practices because the reimbursements aren't even worth keeping, keeping their practice open. [00:06:23] So this Obamacare is just going to be complete train wreck. [00:06:27] I don't know about you, but I'm kind of tired of people making bad decisions and then we pay the bill. [00:06:36] I mean, whether it's drug addiction, alcohol abuse, have multiple children. [00:06:42] I can't tell you the number of medical assistance cards, but back when they had them now, they had debit cards, so they don't even have to do anything. [00:06:53] You'd see one woman's name on it, with eight children, with four different last names. [00:06:59] I mean, it's just totally irresponsible behavior. [00:07:02] And I think it's about time that we stop paying for it. [00:07:04] If private charities want to pay for it, fine. [00:07:07] And they learn the behavior from one generation to the next. [00:07:10] There's just no incentive. [00:07:12] I mean, I've seen three generations of the same family come in and get their, you know, they get their valium, get their painkillers, and it's just a continuous cycle. [00:07:23] My family used to have a drugstore in Attleboro, and we used to sell lottery tickets. [00:07:29] And of course, the first of every month, when the welfare checks came out, we'd sell a lot of water to tenants. [00:07:36] So, that's where a lot of the money goes. [00:07:38] Of course, the government doesn't mind that, because they want to get it back. [00:07:43] And that's six months supply of your meds. [00:07:47] So, how do we get through this mess? [00:07:50] Units, the whole job of public service unions is to expand government. [00:07:55] They want more jobs, which means more union jobs. [00:08:02] They have a vested interest in not doing anything efficiently. [00:08:07] If they don't do it efficiently, then we have to hire more people to do the same job. [00:08:12] And like I said, there's no incentive to do a good job. === Studies on Head Start (02:09) === [00:08:17] Everywhere I work that has a union, the net effect of a union is the good people leave because they don't need the protection of the union, and the union pay isn't good enough because they're good employees, they can earn more. [00:08:31] The bad employees stay because they need the protection of the union. [00:08:36] And then the media employees say, well, I'll stay around because I like the job security, but that guy doesn't work hard, so I'm not going to leave it. [00:08:46] So the whole union system just, there's no incentive to do anything well. [00:08:54] Every government program, whenever it fails, the first thing they do is say they're understaffed and underfunded. [00:09:00] How many times have you heard that? [00:09:02] Every time there's a failure of any government system. [00:09:05] So the politicians give him more money. [00:09:06] Give him more manpower. [00:09:08] And then, two years later, something else happens. [00:09:13] And it fails. [00:09:14] A couple of examples. [00:09:16] Head Start. [00:09:18] Everybody talks about what a great program Head Start is. [00:09:21] Most of the studies that have been done on Head Start show that the first few years after Head Start, the kids have an advantage. [00:09:29] But after that, there's absolutely no difference. [00:09:31] We're spending billions of dollars on Head Start, and it doesn't do anything? [00:09:35] It's basically a glorified babysitter service. [00:09:39] The D.A.R.E. [00:09:40] program. [00:09:41] How many... does Cumberland & Lincoln have D.A.R.E. [00:09:43] programs? [00:09:46] All the studies that have been done, the University of Chicago, I think, has done 11 or 12 studies on the D.A.R.E. [00:09:51] program. [00:09:52] 11 of them said that it accomplished absolutely nothing, and one said it actually increased drug use by introducing kids to drugs. [00:10:01] And basically, it was a political payoff to the police unions, because right in the federal legislation, it says the DARE program has to be taught by a police officer in uniform. [00:10:10] So it was basically just a political payoff. [00:10:13] You can't have a doctor, a nurse, or a pharmacist go into a school under the DARE program and talk about drug abuse. [00:10:21] There was probably at most three qualified people to do it. [00:10:24] But it has to be a police officer in uniform.