All Episodes
Previous Next
April 8, 1998 - Bill Cooper
59:21
IRS Article and IRS Letter
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Lights out on the floor.
Seizing power of the time.
I am the greatest man in the world, Susan Ryan.
I am the greatest man in the world.
I am the greatest man in the world.
The.
Good evening you're listening to the hour of the time and I'm still working through.
Ladies and gentlemen I've got quite a bit of important information to give you today.
That is, if you're an American and care about the future for your children, the future of liberty and freedom, then you're going to need pen and paper and you're going to need to pay some notes today, folks.
I sincerely hope that you will do that.
I'm going to try to cover as much as I possibly can.
In this one hour time slot that I have, you know, it's really not an effort at all.
Suddenly when you get right down to it, everything is said and done in about 45 minutes.
So don't go away.
I'll be right back after this brief pause.
I'm going to be talking about the new version of the game, which is called The Last of Us.
I'm going to be talking about the new version of the game, So, I'm going to go ahead and do a little bit of a
demonstration.
So, I'm going to go ahead and do a demonstration.
My days are numbered, so every day means a lot to me.
Today's broadcast comes from the pages of the Round Valley Paper.
We've got our copy, courtesy of Glenn Jacobs, in the mail today.
And, lo and behold, on page five, there was an article about something near and dear to me heart.
If you forget what it is, the title of the article which arrives in the fall of the IRS,
by Judith M. Scarr-Rower.
And I certainly admire Judith for trying to make a point about the Internal Revenue Service,
But unfortunately, Judas is terribly misinformed.
And so, I'm going to read this article, and then I'm going to set it straight.
You see, Judith really takes some of what she wrote from different sources, part of which is the Farmer's Almanac and others, and I take mine from the law.
In other words, if it doesn't come out of the law, if it's not thoroughly documented and sourced, and I can't take it right exactly, and the truth of the matter, then I don't deal with it.
I don't know about organizations that deal with it either.
Now, don't get me wrong.
I'm not trying to criticize Judith.
I'm not trying to say she did the wrong thing.
I'm not trying to discourage anybody from writing articles or sending them in to their own valley paper.
That's not my goal.
My goal is to educate.
Too many people take too many things for granted in this country.
So let me read you this article, and then let me read you a letter that I sent to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of Washington, D.C.
today, sparked by this article.
I wrote that letter to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue because of this article.
Despite the fact that some of your information is erroneous, you have instigated some good work here, and I want to thank you for that.
It's entitled, The Rise and Fall of the IRS, by Judith M. Starr-Lower.
And she quotes a Nashville Southern Lumberman, or the Nashville Southern Lumberman, quote, A citizen is a man who demands better roads, bigger schools, a new post office, and lower taxes, end quote.
And this is the text of the article.
According to the Farmers' Almanac, the first official income tax landed on these shores on February the 25th, 1913.
We were rapidly becoming an industrialized nation.
The purpose of taxation is to provide services and security for citizens.
In effect, education, highways, utilities, social welfare, and defense.
Initially, it was a fair and simple system.
In 1923, total government expenditures were at $8.9 billion, with 4.6 of that going local, 1.2 going state, and 3.1 federal.
By 1936, however, when the Revenue Act of 1936 was enacted, with the subsequent creation of the Internal Revenue Service, figures began to change dramatically.
By then, total government expenditures were up to $17 billion, with the largest piece of the pie, 8.6 going to the feds, 2.4 going to the states, and 6.0 to the locals.
In simpler terms, federal spending rose from one-third to one-half in 1936.
Also during this period, tax collections rose from about 7.2% of the national income to 11.1%.
In that same year, total taxation amounted to 16.4% of the national income.
The upward spiral continues to this day.
Since the inception of the Internal Revenue Service in 1936, the, quote, system, end quote, has become like a legendary hydra, cut off one head and two more grow in its place.
According to an editorial in the Arizona Republic, I call it the Arizona Repulsive, Dated January 2, 1998, last year, the IRS collected nearly $4 billion in delinquencies, issued 370,000 liens, and seized 10,000 properties.
Of more concern are not so much the amounts, although they are awesome, being extracted, but rather the methods with which the behemoth extracts them.
Many citizens have complained of Gestapo tactics.
Take, for instance, the case of the Jewish mother, a restaurant in the eastern part of the United States.
A dismissed and disgruntled employee went to the Internal Revenue Service and complained his former employer was involved in illegal activities, drugs, involving large amounts of unreported income.
Without any investigation whatsoever, Internal Revenue Service agents stormed the Jewish mother and effectively shut her down.
They confiscated, at gunpoint, company records and computers.
Only after weeks of wrangling was the owner cleared of all charges.
By that time, his business was in ruins.
More recently, a figure skater who was slated to go to Nagano for the Winter Olympics was jailed for income tax evasion.
He had conscientiously objected to the system for years.
Last January showed us just how far the injustices have gone Enter Charles Rosati, a former high-tech executive.
As new commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, he ordered agents to stop setting bounties on people.
When are we, the American people, going to say, enough is enough?
That's an excellent question, Mr. Rohrer.
That's probably the most important question of this time.
Well, I've got a lot of things to say about this article.
It is based upon misconceptions, misinformation, myth, and rumor, ladies and gentlemen.
And the Farmer's Almanac may be a good source of when to plant your crops, but it is not a good source for information on the Internal Revenue Service.
The first official income tax, ladies and gentlemen, was promulgated by President Abraham Lincoln in the Civil War.
It was a war tax.
And even then, Abraham Lincoln knew that he did not have the right to levy a direct tax upon the citizens of the states.
The income tax for the war effort pertained to the territories and the boundaries of the District of Columbia, known as Washington, D.C.
And those in the repatriated or captured or re-captured southern states in rebellion.
Okay?
The income tax promulgated on February 25th, 1913 was known, ladies and gentlemen, as the Corporate Income Tax.
Understanding the federal government could not levy a direct tax upon the citizens of the United States, it levied the tax on artificial entities, legal fictions known as corporations.
There was not an income tax on any individuals or people until World War II when the Victory Tax was implemented.
The victory tax was passed by Congress and automatically self-destructed after two years.
Just like the tax levied by Lincoln in the Civil War, the victory tax only could be levied against those United States citizens who lived within the jurisdiction of the federal government, which is the boundaries of Washington, D.C., the Federal District of Columbia, the territories, insular possessions, dockyards, forts, dry docks, etc.
Any taxes paid by the citizens of the states was voluntary, and since the war effort was a big thing then, many citizens did volunteer and did pay the income tax.
At the end of the victory tax, when it automatically expired, the citizens had forgotten, ladies and gentlemen, that it had expired, and most Americans were paying it to help the war effort voluntarily.
At the expiration of the victory tax, the government never told the people that it had expired, kept sending out the income tax forms, and kept demanding that the people pay the tax.
The tax wasn't legitimized until the federal government passed the Public Employees Tax Act.
Which said that working for the government was a privileged occupation.
And that the government could tax the incomes of those employees working for the United States government, but even at that time, ladies and gentlemen, they only had the authority under the Constitution to tax those government employees who lived and worked within the boundaries of the Federal District of Columbia, Washington, D.C., insular possessions, United States territories, dockyards, forts, dry docks, etc.
The federal government made treaties or agreements with the several states, individually, each one of them.
If you don't believe it, put in a Freedom of Information Act to see the treaties and our agreements made between the Internal Revenue Service and your particular state of the union.
You will get a redacted copy.
They don't dare give you the whole copy, even though you're entitled to see it.
And you will have to sue to get the whole copy, like I did.
And if you get the whole copy, you will find out that it is agreement between the individual states in the Internal Revenue Service to tax the government employees who live and work for the United States government within the several states of the Union.
It also, reciprocally, Because the law says that treaties are reciprocal.
It reciprocally gives the states the right to have a state income tax on those same employees.
The state, however, extended it to everybody, and so did the federal government.
And since you can't get your hands on the whole thing without suing them, and up until you heard me say this, You never even knew that such an agreement existed.
There had to be a treaty because the federal government did not have the authority or the power to tax any citizens living and residing within a state.
Now, you don't all know that.
In fact, the American people, for the most part, don't know much of anything outside of their own personal lives and what they learn at work.
And that's the truth, ladies and gentlemen.
It's going to make some of you mad because you're walking around with a big head and think you really know so much, and you don't.
I'm not saying that to insult you.
I'm saying that to maybe get you to go and check it out.
Just check it out.
You know what?
You're going to find out that I'm right.
Most of my life I was just like all of you.
People pay income taxes because their mother told them to.
Or their parents did.
Or they saw what happened to a neighbor who didn't.
And they're scared They're scared out of their minds.
People are so much in fear of the government in this nation, the land, the home of the free and the brave, live in terror of the Internal Revenue Service.
Now, there's lots of things in this article that are wrong.
I've just begun to touch upon it, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, the figures of the expenditures are probably correct.
The statement that the expenditures comes from the income tax, however, is not.
If you pay the Internal Revenue Service your income tax by check, when you get your check back, look on the back and see who cashed it.
It is not the Treasury of the United States of America.
It was not deposited in the Treasury of the United States of America.
It says, in fact, pay to any Federal Reserve Bank.
Pay to any Federal Reserve Bank.
Does it say pay to the account of the United States of America?
Does it say to the account of the Treasury of the United States of America?
No.
It says pay on account of the United States of America, which means it's in payment of debt.
It doesn't go to pay for highways and roads or any of those things that Judith has listed here in her article.
Not at all.
She makes a further statement down here that is really, really way off base.
And let me find that, because I want to quote it directly.
Now I've lost it.
I'm going to find it.
I'm going to find it.
Just hold on.
Oh, here it is.
She says, the purpose of taxation is to provide services and security for citizens.
In effect, education, highways, utilities, social welfare, and defense.
And that is wrong!
There is nothing in the Constitution for the United States of America that says that the citizens will be taxed by the federal government to provide services on security for citizens, education, highways, utilities, social welfare, and defense.
In fact, you're not even entitled to any of those things.
There are no rights given you Any of those things, those things are left to the states to provide, provided that the people of the states want to put money into those things.
And for most of the history of this country, there was no such thing as a public education, public highways, public utilities.
Social welfare is one of the biggest plagues that has ever been foisted on this country, or, ladies and gentlemen, defense.
In fact, if you'll read the Constitution, the only constitutionally standing military force is the United States Navy.
All others are unconstitutional.
You see, the Founding Fathers did not believe in standing military forces.
They believed that that would be the beginning of the end of freedom.
And by golly, it just may be.
You see, service, especially lifelong or career service in any military force, regardless of how patriotic or noble it might be, and I served my share, believe me, is nothing more than an indoctrination into a socialistic way of life.
That's the truth.
That's the truth, ladies and gentlemen.
She's right about the system becoming like the legendary Hydra, cut off one head and two more grow in its place.
The federal government has grown to the point that it is no longer constitutional in almost any aspect.
It has gone way beyond the limitations set forth within the Constitution for the United
States and has far, far beyond your imagination, exceeded the powers granted to it by the people.
It has, in fact, become despotic.
It is now in the process of taking freedom away from the people, taking their constitutionally
guaranteed creator-endowed rights away, taxing the people in ways that is unconstitutional
and in fact is forbidden.
For instance, she says down here, according to an editorial she gives her source in the
Arizona Repulsive, January 2nd, 1998, quote, last year the IRS collected nearly $4 billion
in delinquencies, issued 370,000 liens and seized 10,000 properties, end quote.
Bye.
Bye!
Number one, ladies and gentlemen, the IRS does not exist.
It is a fiction, and I'm going to prove it to you.
The IRS had no authority to collect four billion dollars from the citizens of the several states.
Period.
The IRS does not issue liens.
The IRS does not have the authority to issue liens.
The IRS A notice of lien is not a lien.
A lien must be a judgment from a court.
takes the evidence of that recorded notice of lien to the county sheriff who then posts
the lien on the property. A notice of lien is not a lien. A lien must be a judgment from
a court. Whenever the IRS does that, they are engaging in criminal activity, the unlawful
seizure of property, theft, if you will.
.
The sheriffs, not really understanding the law themselves, allow this to happen.
In fact, you might say they're co-conspirators in this, since they don't do anything to prevent it.
The IRS, being a federal agency, and completely without powers of enforcement That's right, that's what I said.
Completely, under the law, without powers of enforcement, levy, or lien, or arrest, or to serve a subpoena, or any of those things, is acting under the cover of law, and in fact, becomes a criminal organization, an outlaw, Committing felonies against the citizens of the states.
When they seize property, ladies and gentlemen, they're committing an unconstitutional act, they're committing a felony, they're operating again under the color of law, and have no authority to do so without a court order and after having gone through the due process as guaranteed by the Constitution and by the law.
See, these are things you don't know.
You're afraid of a straw man.
a straw man that doesn't even exist.
You think so?
Thank you.
you You think so, ladies and gentlemen?
You really think the IRS exists?
Have you ever received a letter from the Internal Revenue Service?
Have you ever looked up in the upper right hand corner of that envelope and noticed that it is stamped with a postage stamp?
Or it is stamped by a machine which registers the amount of postage which the IRS must pay?
Did you know, ladies and gentlemen, that legitimate agencies of the United States government have franking privileges and do not put postage stamps or stamps or pay postage for the mail that they send out?
Were you aware of that, ladies and gentlemen?
That is the first easily recognizable piece of evidence, easily discovered by any citizen, that the Internal Revenue Service is not an agency of the federal government.
is not an agency of the United States Department of the Treasury and never was.
Never was.
Now, I know this because I've done the research, ladies and gentlemen.
I know also that all agencies of the federal government must be created by an act of Congress There was never any Bureau of Internal Revenue created by any Act of Congress ever.
There was never any Internal Revenue Service created by any Act of Congress ever.
The Internal Revenue Service, unlike other legitimate agencies, does not list its origin in its own regulations.
Recently, when they hired a historian To write and maintain the history of the Internal Revenue Service, she found that the history was hidden, intentionally concealed, that there were no records.
When she tried to find the records, she was given a hard time and ultimately came under investigation by the Internal Revenue Service, was threatened, was intimidated, and so she quit her job.
But not before she gave us an awful lot of information on what she was able to find.
If you look under the organization of the Department of the Treasury in the United States Code, you will not find any listing for the Internal Revenue Service, for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, and for the Secret Service.
None of them were ever created by an act of Congress None of them are agencies of the United States government.
None of them are agencies of the United States Department of the Treasury.
Not one single one of them.
Now, to prove it, ladies and gentlemen, today I wrote a letter.
And I've given the Commissioner of Internal Revenue 20 days Now, when you talk about a number of days, when you're talking about government, that's twenty working days.
So, it's going to take four weeks to get an answer back, if I get an answer, and I'm going to tell you right now, I will receive no answer.
My letter will be ignored.
If I do get an answer, it will not be to the question that I ask in this letter, which is a very simple question.
If I don't get a letter within 20 days, I will tell you of that, and you can expect that that's what you're going to hear.
If I do get a letter, I will read that letter on the air.
Now, I'm going to read to you the letter that I sent to Mr. Charles O. Rosati, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20224, March 8, 1998.
I wrote this letter because Judith's column, Judith Rohrer's column, inspired me to do
I want to thank you, Judith, for that.
Dear Mr. Rossati, many years ago I tried to find within the Internal Revenue Code the
section which created your agency, the Internal Revenue Service, but I was unable to find
I then decided to locate other sources of information regarding how the Internal Revenue Service was established and what I found was nothing short of amazing.
In 1972, an Internal Revenue Manual, 1100, was published in both the Federal Register and Cumulative Bulletin, C-37, Federal Regulations 20960-1972-2, Cumulative Bulletin 836, a copy of which is attached for your convenience on the very first page of this statement.
Published in the Bulletin, the following admission was made.
3.
By common parlance, and understanding of the time, an office of the importance of the Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue was a Bureau.
The Secretary of the Treasury, in his report at the close of the calendar year, 1862, stated that, quote, the Bureau of Internal Revenue has been organized under the act of the last session Also, it can be seen that Congress had intended to establish a Bureau of Internal Revenue, or thought they had, from the Act of March 3, 1863, in which provision was made for the President to appoint, with Senate confirmation, a Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue who shall be charged with such duties in the Bureau of Internal Revenue as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury
Or, as may be required by law, and who shall act as Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the absence of that officer, and exercise the privilege of cranking all letters and documents pertaining to the Office of Internal Revenue.
In other words, the Office of Internal Revenue was the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and the Act of July 1st, 1862 is the Organic Act of today's Internal Revenue Service."
This statement, ladies and gentlemen, which again appears, well, let me read it as the letter.
This statement, which again appears in a similar publication appearing at 39 Federal Regulations 11572, 1974-1, Cumulative Bulletin 440, as well as the current Internal Revenue Manual 1100, essentially admits that Congress never created either the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Internal Revenue Service.
To conclude that, quote, Congress thought it had created this agency, end quote, is an admission that even the government itself cannot find anything which created either agency.
The only office created by the Act of July 1st, 1862, was the Office of the Commissioner.
Neither the Bureau nor the Service was actually created by any of these Acts.
I have no doubt that when employees of the Internal Revenue Service were researching its origins so that this statement could be included within Internal Revenue Manual 1100, those employees must have performed a very thorough investigation.
This obviously is the best position that your agency can develop regarding precisely how the Internal Revenue Service came into being.
But besides the problem that these acts simply did not create either the Bureau of the Internal Revenue Service Is the fact, either the Bureau or the Internal Revenue Service, is the fact that these acts were repealed by the adoption of the revised statutes of 1873.
Now as an aside ladies and gentlemen, and just as an explanation, even if they had, which they didn't, and you can check the laws yourself and see, That they did not create any bureau, any agency whatsoever, known as the Bureau of the Internal Revenue Service, or the Internal Revenue Service, or the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
None were created.
Period.
Very easy to find these laws, and it's very easy to read them.
But even if they had, those acts were repealed by the adoption of the revised statutes of 1873,
which did not create or continue those that had existed in that act.
Therefore, it would appear that your agency has never been created by any act of Congress, and this is a serious flaw.
At the state level, it is a well-acknowledged rule that a duly constituted office of state government must be created either by the state constitution itself or by some legislative act.
C. Patton v. Board of Health, 127, California, 388, 393, 59, p.
702, 704, 1899.
One of the requisites is that the office must be created by the Constitution of the State, or it must be authorized by some statute.
1st National Bank of Columbus v. State, 80, Nebraska, 597, 114, N.W.
197, 114, NW 772, 773, 1908. State X. Rel. Payton v. Cunningham, 39, Montana, 197, 103,
Page 497, 498, 1909. State X. Rel. Stage v. Mackey, 82, Connecticut, 398, 74A, 759, 761,
State X.
Rel.
Key v. Bond, 94, West Virginia, 255, 118, S.E.
255, 118, S.E. 276, 279, 1923.
Quote, a position is a public office when it is created by law.
End quote.
Coyne v. State, 22, Ohio, Appellate, 462, 153, N.E. 876, 877, 1926.
Unless the office existed, there could be no officer, either de facto or de jure.
A de facto officer is one invested with an office, but if there is no office with which to invest one, there can be no officer.
An office may exist only by duly constituted law.
State versus Quinn, 35, New Mexico, 62, 290, page 786, 787, 1930.
Turner versus State, 226, Alabama, 269, 146.
S-O, 601, 602, 1933.
Oklahoma City versus Century Indemnity Company, 178, Oklahoma, 212, 62.
1937, 1930. Turner v. State, 226 Alabama, 269, 146. S.O. 601, 602, 1933. Oklahoma City
v. Century Indemnity Company, 178 Oklahoma, 212, 62. P.
Second, 94, 97, 1936. State, X. Rel. Nagel v. Kelsey, 102 Montana, 1936.
Stapleton vs. Frommiller, 53, Arizona, 11, 85P, 2nd, 49, 51, 1938.
second 685 689 1936 Stapleton versus from Miller 53 Arizona 1185 P.
second 4951 1938 Buchholz versus Hill 178 Maryland 280 13 A.
second 348 350 1940 Krawiec versus Industrial Commission 370.
People versus Rapsi, 16, California, D, 636, 107, P, 2nd, 388, 391, 1940.
25 NE 2nd 27 29 1940 People vs. Rapsi 16 California D 636 107 P 2nd 388 391 1940 Industrial Commission
vs. Arizona State Highway Commission 61 Arizona 59 145 P 2nd 846 849 1943 State X-Rail Brown
versus Blue, 20, Washington, 2, 12.
Martin vs. Smith, 239, Wisconsin, 314, 1NW, 2nd, 163, 172, 1941.
45 P 2nd 554 556 1944 Martin vs. Smith 239 WIS 314 1 N W 2nd 163 172 1941 Taylor vs.
Commonwealth 305 Kentucky 75 202 SW 2nd 99 299 4 1947 State X rel Hamblin vs.
yell 29 Morris vs. Peters, 203, Georgia, 350, 46SE, 2nd, 729, 723, 1948.
68 185 P second 723 728 1947. Morris versus Peters 203 Georgia 350 46 S.E. second 729
723 1948. Weaver versus North Bergen T.P. 10 New Jersey super 90 excuse me 96 76 A second
701, 1950. Tomeris v. State, 71.
2nd, 209, 211, 1950.
Pollock v. Montoya, 55, New Mexico, 390, 234, P.
2nd, 336, 338, 1951.
Schaefer v. Superior Court, N & 4, Santa Barbara County, 248, P.
1950 Pollock versus Montoya 55 New Mexico 390 234 P. 2nd 336 338 1951 Schaefer versus
Superior Court in and for Santa Barbara County 248 P. 2nd 450 453 California Appellate Court
1952 Brushingham versus State 86 Georgia Appellate, 340, 71.
S.E.
Second, 698, 703, 1952.
State X-Rail Matthews versus Murray, 258.
P. Second, 982, 984.
State X. Rel. Matthews v. Murray, 258 P. 2nd, 982-984, Nevada, 1953.
Dostler v. Andrus, 2011.
Hetrick v. County Commission of Anne Arundel County, 222 Maryland, 304-159A2nd, 642-643, 1960.
N.W. 2nd, 765-767-1955.
Hetrick v. County Commission of Anne Arundel County, 222 Maryland, 304-159-A.
2nd, 642-643-1960.
Meland v. Cody, 359 Michigan, 78-101-N.W.
2nd, 336-341-1960.
Jones v. Mills, 216 Georgia, 616-118-SE.
2nd, 484-485-1961.
State v. Ford, 264 North Carolina, 149-141-SE.
2nd, 241-245-1965.
Planning Board of TPO.
of West Milford versus T.P.
Council of T.P.
of West Milford, 123 New Jersey Super, or Superior, 135-301-A-2nd-781-784-1973.
I could go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.
Let me continue.
I'm going to skip over a bunch of these sites.
I think you get the point.
I continue with the letter.
The same rule applies at the federal level.
See United States v. Germain, 99, United States Supreme Court, 508, 1879.
Norton v. Shelby County, 118, United States Supreme Court, 425, 441, 6, Supreme Court, 1121, 1886.
Quote, There can be no officer, either de jure or de facto, if there be no office to fill.
1818 United States Supreme Court 425 441 6 Supreme Court 1121 1886 quote
there can be no officer either the juror or the fact of if there be no office to fill
in quote United States versus Mullet 125.
United States v. Smith, 124, United States Supreme Court, 525, 8th Supreme Court, 595, 1888.
United States Supreme Court 525, 8th Supreme Court 595, 1888.
Glaby v. United States 182, United States Supreme Court 595, 607, 21, Supreme Court
891, 1901.
Quote, The law creates the office, prescribes its duties.
Kocknauer v. United States, 248, U.S.
405, 407, 39, Supreme Court, 137, 1919.
Quote, Primarily, we may say that the creation of offices and the assignment of their compensation is a legislative function, and we think the delegation of such function and the extent of its delegation must have clear expression or implication, end quote.
Burnap versus United States, 252, United States Supreme Court, 512, 516, 40, Supreme Court, 374, 376, 1920.
512 516 40 Supreme Court 374 376 1920 Metcalf versus Eddie excuse me Metcalf and Eddie versus Mitchell.
269 United States Supreme Court 514 46 Supreme Court 172 173 1926.
NLRB versus Coca-Cola bottling company of Louisville 350 United States Supreme Court 264 269 76 Supreme Court
383 1956 quote officers normally means those who hold defined offices.
It does not mean the boys in the back room or other agencies of invisible government, whether in politics or in the trade union movement, end quote.
Crowley versus Southern Rye Company, 139F, 851, 853, 5th Circuit, 1905.
Adams vs. Murphy, 165F, 304, 8th Circuit, 1908.
Scully vs. United States, 193F, 185, 187.
D, Nevada, 1910.
1905 Adams versus Murphy 165 F 3048 circuit 1908 Scully versus United States 193 F 185
187 D Nevada 1910 quote there can be no officers of the United States strictly speaking except
those which are created by the Constitution itself or by an act of Congress in quote Commissioner
2nd, 660-662, 9th Circuit Court, 1935.
Varden v. Ridings, 20 F.
Sup., 495 E.D.
Kentucky, 1937.
Anoni v. Blass, Nattles, Ayers, 94 F.
2nd, 513-515, 1st Circuit Court, 1938.
And Pope v. Commissioner, 138 F.
Varden v. Writings, 20 F. Sup., 495, E.D. Kentucky, 1937, and Onnie v. Blass, Nattles,
Ayers, 94 F. 2nd, 513, 515, 1st Circuit Court, 1938, and Pope v. Commissioner, 138 F. 2nd,
1006, 1009, 6th Circuit, 1943. Since I have reached the conclusion that the Internal Revenue
Service has never been created by Congress, I am asking you to provide to me the citation
of any statute which really did create the Internal Revenue Service.
Since this is a question of profound national importance, I request that you provide an answer to me within twenty days.
Failing a response within that time period, I shall conclude that you cannot find any such statute and shall act accordingly, respectively, William Cooper."
You see, ladies and gentlemen, what are you afraid of and why are you afraid?
Ha ha ha.
What can they do?
Hmm?
You know, if every American citizen would stop being afraid and become the powerful citizen that they are, Most of our troubles would evaporate before morning.
Did you know that?
But it's not going to happen because most people are scared silly of anything.
They want to know what's in it for me.
Or how can I stay out of trouble?
Or I'm not going to take any risk.
Uh uh, not me.
Oh no, no sir.
I'm not going to say anything.
I don't care what they do.
It'll never happen to me.
Just the other guy over there.
That guy down there.
Bologna.
Folks, it will happen to you.
Sheep are always sheared and then led to the slaughter.
Let me say that again.
Sheep are always sheared and then It's not really funny.
But when you've been at this as long as I have, sometimes it is funny.
Sometimes it's hilarious.
trust, and a shepherd whom they believe sincerely is looking out after their best interests
and would never, ever hurt them."
It's not really funny, but when you've been at this as long as I have, sometimes it is
funny.
Sometimes it's hilarious, I've got to tell you.
Sometimes it's just absolutely hilarious, ladies and gentlemen.
I can't believe somebody wrote in a paper that we're supposed to get welfare and highways and education and all that stuff from the federal government.
Where does it say in the Constitution that we're entitled to any of those things?
Or that we have the right to any of those things?
Or that the federal government is supposed to furnish them?
Want to know the answer?
Absolutely nowhere.
In fact, if you want to know the truth, if you really want to get down to the reality of the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, the federal government is not allowed to do any of those things.
Those do not come under the powers granted to governments.
In fact, the federal government is severely restricted from messing in any way within the states except for certain specific powers that have been given to it.
And I've got to tell you, if it doesn't have anything to do with interstate commerce, counterfeiting, piracy, and a few other very few things, then folks, when it comes to interstate commerce, The Founding Fathers never intended interstate commerce to mean what it has been interpreted to mean.
In fact, they didn't intend for any of their words to be interpreted.
They chose their words carefully, according to the definition of those words.
And to really understand the definition of those words, you have to have a Webster's 1828 or earlier dictionary.
And to understand the intent of the Founding Fathers, you must read the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers and their writings and their letters and their books and read their speeches.
Then you know what they meant.
And if you think that that doesn't amount to a hill of beans, I've got to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, intent is everything in the law.
To understand the law, you must understand the intent of those who passed the law.
That's why we have a congressional record.
That's why the writings of the major lawmakers of this nation and the major figures in the founding of this nation have been preserved so carefully over the years.
It could even be said that that body of writing may be even the foundation of the law.
Most people don't understand The foundation of the law in this country.
And the first document of the law in this country didn't have anything to do with this country.
It was called the Magna Carta.
The second document in law is the Mayflower Pact.
And then come some of the pacts and constitutions and agreements and contracts made by the first colonists in their colonies and towns in the societies that they formed.
And then the Declaration of Independence.
And the Articles of Confederation are still a part of our law.
The Constitution for the United States of America, the Bill of Rights.
Many things that most of you have never read, never looked at, don't understand.
I fail to see how they cannot be understood because they are so simple.
They are simplicity.
The Constitution for the United States of America consists of seven very short articles.
The Bill of Rights, ten very short articles.
The Bill of Rights is, in fact, a part of the Constitution and is not separate from it, as many of you believe.
A copy of the Constitution for the United States of America without the Bill of Rights
is not a complete document.
Is not a complete document.
A copy of the Constitution for the United States of America without the Bill of Rights
Did you know that for anything that Congress does to have an effect upon the citizens of the states, it cannot be an act of Congress, but may, must be legislation passed in Congress, assembled, and it must use that language, An act of Congress, ladies and gentlemen, by definition
does not apply to the citizens of the states, but to the Federal District of Columbia, the
territories, insular possessions, dockyards, forts, dry docks, and etc.
You've been so misled so many years, my heart goes out to you all the time.
The years that I was lost in that fantasy land of thinking that everything was okay and that I understood everything, but I didn't know beans about anything.
When I look back on it, it's like a century in a deep, dark, evil forest stumbling around at midnight, bumping into
trees.
Not being able to see the evil lurking all around me.
Bye.
That is the state in which most of you find yourselves today.
Now I stand in the middle of a flower-studded meadow with my children playing around me and my wife standing at my side, bathed In warm sunlight.
And I can see the evil long before it even begins to threaten me.
And since I've left that dark midnight forest, things have become much more simple.
And I am Free!
Freer than any of you may ever be.
But you have that kind of freedom, you also incur a great risk.
But that is the price of freedom.
And eternal vigilance, and the willingness to die for what you believe in, for that freedom, For the future of your children.
That is the price of freedom.
Those who are not willing to pay that price, might as well go down and purchase the chains
and fasten them securely around your own ankles.
Save everybody the trouble.
It's going to be another good one.
Sarah Brady is at it again.
She has sent out a confidential memo to all handgun control members.
Tomorrow I'm going to read it to you.
You're going to see what the Wicked Witch is up to now.
People don't kill people, guns do!
Good night, folks, and God bless each And every single one of you.
All of a sudden, in the middle of the night, there's a loud knock on your door.
Hey, Hank.
Something's not right.
Relax your arms.
Take a step forward fast.
We're here for you.
We're here to help you.
And I'm from the I.R.S.
with a power and a tax.
If you've got a complaint, ha ha ha ha ha ha, say it with a fax.
Get out of this house.
Surrender your taxes.
Give me your gold.
You better pay for my trouble.
That's the best shot I can do for your assault.
Hillary Shalala, Ringo Janet Dyke, reading the words of General Alvin Tite.
The money founder of the Ku Klux Klan, engineer of the Masonic Master Plan.
Peace.
Peace.
Pike's business, Lucifer is got across this land.
They put insane kicks and marks in your right hand.
While we're all dancing to the drums of a full bright, Clint's preparing it for another fuse.
Tanks, pikes, drones, tanks.
Order out of chaos, aggression, inflation, creates a panic, then rakes it.
Ladies and gentlemen, the letter that I read on the air that I sent to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was
prepared by William Benson.
And now, I present to you, the letter that I sent to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
The U.N. and White and Brown, the AGM, the men and blacks, are the one world order.
But it's not new.
Iron Mountain, Computer Beast, and cattle mutilations.
Black projects, year holds and we're just heading combinations.
The Nazi doctors didn't die. Come on, get him.
They came here with the OSF.
You can get your own copy of that letter from our website, harvest-trust.org.
I'm not going to tell you where to find it, because I want you to search the website.
If you do that, you'll find a lot of stuff you need to know that you've never even seen.
And that's part of my goal, folks.
The sonic mind in inflation, in fighting riots, in crisis creation, in war, and in health.
Mildrip in pancrease. Vaccinate your kids for you and I and you can be king.
This is a test for all of us. So I have today just one simple request.
A comprehensive package of health care benefits that's always...
101.1 FM Eager is your non-profit community service radio station.
Be sure and tune in tomorrow at the same time for another edition live
▲
Export Selection