MUST-WATCH WEDNESDAY EMERGENCY BROADCAST: Federal Judge Greenlights The Destruction Of Infowars' Free Speech! PLUS, Democrats Pledge To Hold America Hostage With Government Shutdown Until Trump Accepts Full Benefits/Free Healthcare For ALL Illegal Alien Invaders! FINALLY, Official Charlie Kirk Assassination Narrative Collapses, Triggering Firestorm In MAGA Base! — FULL SHOW 10/1/25
Rob Dew and Alex Jones confront a federal judge's order to seize Infowars' assets, alleging a Democratic "lawfare" campaign backed by tech giants like Palantir to enforce Agenda 2030. They dissect the Charlie Kirk shooting, arguing official ballistic trajectories are physically impossible and demanding an autopsy to expose deep state cover-ups involving Israel and Democrats. The broadcast further claims COVID-19 deaths were manufactured via midazolam and that mRNA vaccines contain SV40 contaminants guaranteeing cancer, framing these events as a spiritual war against globalist elites like BlackRock who seek to enslave humanity through false flags and transgender ideology. [Automatically generated summary]
So it's going to be up to us on January 6th, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified and that we need bodyguards for everybody in Civil War conditions.
unidentified
This is just a warning to you Trumpers.
Be careful.
Walk lightly.
We ain't playing with you.
And for those of you who are soldiers, you know how to do it.
I'm your host, Rob Deuce, sitting in for Alex Jones.
He has to, he actually just left the office about 20 minutes ago to take care of a personal matter.
He will be back on the air.
But we had several things happen this morning.
I actually came here to shoot videos earlier in the morning, and then we had some legal documents crop up, and we were analyzing those for most of the morning.
I'm going to go over them with you.
As you know, the government shut down overnight at midnight tonight, 12:01 actually, in the early morning hours, because the Democrats want to give health care to illegal aliens, and they want nothing more than that.
And that's their line in the sand.
They've drawn their line in the sand, and that is where we are with that.
But I do want to get to this.
There's a tweet Alex put out just a little bit ago: Red Alert.
The Democrats want to shut down Infowars today in Houston federal court at 1 p.m.
Read Alex Jones' legal teams.
Exclusive filing that proves the deep state/slash Democrat Party's conspiracy to shut down Infowars with unprecedented lawfare, which will set an insanely dangerous precedent for the free press.
There's four screenshots of the first four pages of the filing and then a full link to the scribbed for the full 27 pages.
So there's a 27-page filing, and then we're putting up a 300-page filing, which has all the evidentiary listings and court cases and everything applicable through that, all the exhibits, essentially.
So it's a total of 377 pages.
And so I do want to go over that.
Let's just go ahead and play, though.
Clip one, the resolution to keep the government open has officially failed.
So we are, and this is not going to be good for the Democrats.
They think they're owning something on this or blaming it on Trump because he won't give health care to illegals.
And well, let's just show the history because here it is.
Trump is calling it, I guess MAGA is basically calling it the Schumer shutdown.
Let's see.
Hey, guys, clip 21.
Is this Allison Steinberg questioning Maxine Waters?
Okay, let's go to that because I watched that this morning, one of the few clips I did watch this morning, watching her get visibly upset when a reporter is saying, hey, this is just, you're shutting the government down just because you can't give health care to illegal aliens, right?
And Maxine Waters throws a fit.
So let's go to that and then we're going to go to this document.
What we're doing is saying simply we want to keep the government open and we want to work with the Republicans and have a bipartisan agreement to keep this government open and health care is at the top of our agenda.
People being people that aren't even from this country, that don't pay taxes, that have just arrived and are getting freebies left and right.
And that's what they want to do.
They want nothing more than to keep their, because those are their constituents.
I'm sure most of the people watching realize that, but that's the Democrat Party constituent, is the illegal alien.
It is the person that they control with the Obama phone.
It is the person that's getting the messages down in South America.
Hey, come up here.
You're going to get free stuff.
When Biden said, hey, you got to surge the border.
And that's what they did.
They surged the border.
And so it's estimated 20 million people came in during O'Biden's term.
But I want to turn your attention to this.
We have the article on InfoWars, Red Alert, the Democrats want to shut down InfoWars today in federal court at 1 p.m.
So you can go to InfoWars, you can go to at RealAlex Jones, look at the scribbl link, the scrib links in there.
That takes you to this: response to the Sandy Hook family's emergency joint motion for entry of an order confirming that FSS assets are not subject to automatic stay as property of the Alex Jones, Alexander E. Jones, Chapter 7 Estate.
And what this stems from is a couple, there was a hearing in February, and then there was a hearing in June.
And the plaintiffs kept asking the judge to remove the stay.
And the stay is basically keeping everything as it is now, keeping it rolling forward until an appeal could happen or there's some final resolution in this case.
And the Sandy Hook families have filed, well, not the families, the law firms of the families have filed this motion for an emergency hearing.
And it was supposed to be Friday.
Then all of a sudden, it's Monday.
So it literally gave Alex's legal team a day and a half to put this together.
They put together a 27-page preliminary response with another 350 pages of exhibits.
So it's a lot to go through.
I'm going to go through some of the parts for the first 15, 20 pages.
First, the court should know that the oral argument took place before the Third Court of Appeals in Austin in May 2025.
The petition of writ has been filed with the United States Supreme Court in Connecticut.
So basically, that's the first thing his legal team is saying.
There's an appeal, and then there's also putting this case in front of the Supreme Court through the Connecticut case.
And if these go through, well, then, and they rule in Jones' favor, well, then there's no more, you know, no more case for these guys to get money.
So they're trying to, I guess, have a state receiver come in and take over and circumvent the federal appeals court.
That's basically what's going on.
The plaintiffs have known these issues literally for months and waited till 3:35 p.m., Friday, September 26th, to file their emergency motion, which first set the hearing for October 3rd, and now it's reset for Wednesday, October 1st, giving the parties literally one and a half business days to respond.
In addition, this is not an emergency.
This is a denial of due process.
So, right there within the second page, talking about a denial of due process, substantially, the Jones parties are being charitable.
We would say the plaintiff's motion borders on fraudulent.
That's pretty hardcore if you ever read legal documents.
In truth, it so badly misstates the record in this court and other courts that it borders between truth and pre-verification is nowhere in sight.
The plaintiffs have forgotten this inconvenient fact because the June 5th hearing is not referred to a single time in their motion.
So, what they want to do, they claim that the February 25th hearing of the supplemental order is null and void, and they cite a transcript from February 5th, 11 times in their argument.
And this is a lot.
If you haven't been digging through the court documents and reading everything that's out there, you can go to court lister and find all this stuff.
You can find, you can actually listen into the case today at 1 p.m.
You can call in and just listen.
So, I'm sure there'll be a lot of left-leaning journalists in there today just waiting for the judge to basically say, All right, I'm washing my hands of this, and it's all up to the state court, which I don't think he's going to do, but we'll find out.
And so, there's a June 5th, there's the February court hearing and the June 5th court hearing.
And the June 5th, he clarifies.
They actually have a transcript from it.
I got to get this close.
I read in your pleadings.
I went back and listened, and I'll take the blame for not being incredibly as precise as I should have been.
I got to really get into this.
For matters that are currently pending, the order was pending an appeal at the time, so I couldn't revoke one way or the other, right?
Once bankruptcy, once an appeal is filed, the court loses jurisdiction over that.
So, I haven't revoked anything.
I didn't have the authority to do it anyway, but to me, putting up another auction process would be incredibly complicated.
So that was when Jones' lawyers came back and said, hey, what about another auction?
And he didn't want to do another auction because the first auction was a miserable failure.
It was supposed to be an open bidding process.
Then that turned into closed bids.
And then that turned into this weird formula that they came up with to give it to the Onion, who had a lower bid, a lower cash bid, which they admitted to on Good Morning America that their bid was lower in cash, but they had these other considerations, which were based on the judgments that they hadn't even received yet.
So it's like, we have a time machine.
We're going to get these judgments over here and bring them over here.
And then we're going to use that as part of our bid.
So at the February 5th hearing, the plaintiffs and trustees presented a settlement which involved, in part, allowing over 400 million of claims of three other persons that have not even tried a case.
So they've created some deals going on where they're like, hey, we're going to bring in other people who have filed a claim or a case against Jones, but those cases haven't even gone before a court yet.
Even though the court clearly recognized this again in June on the record, that it could not have done so because of the pending appeal, because there's a state appeal going on for the Texas case right now in the appeals court here in Travis County.
Plaintiff's response to this is ignore it like an ostrich.
So the court could not nullify the September order, did not nullify the September order, and could neither interpret it as a nullify.
Knowing these problems and elastic effort in the two pages they raise improperly without proper evidence and seek the court to do so now.
There's in no conceivable way they brought me a magnet.
I don't know if that's going to help.
They brought me a magnifying glass.
Yeah, I'm pretty blind.
In no conceivable way, the plaintiffs have established their entitlement to Rule 60, which, you know, if you're in the legal world, you understand what Rule 60 is.
I'm not even going to get into it at this point.
Perhaps the most troubling and radically inconsistent positions of the plaintiffs have taken before the Texas state courts and strike and stark contrast to what they're advising this court.
So what it boils down to is they've made filings where they're not really interested in the amount of money they can get.
They just want to shut Jones down.
They want to shut Alex Jones down.
That's been their position.
So I want to go to, I'm actually going to jump to page 21.
This is page 21 of 27, and it's under section 3.
The basis for Jones and FSS new request for an order providing for a public sale of the FSS assets by cash only, sealed bid only, and sold to the highest cash bidder.
The Connecticut plaintiffs are not interested in achieving a sale of SSS assets to the highest value, but only a sale that results in the destruction of Alex Jones' brand, InfoWars.
And that's regarding to the Onion attempted purchase.
The Connecticut and Texas plaintiffs and the Onion have announced to the trial courts, to the media, and to this bankruptcy court through their conduct and their frequent statements that their true motive is not to obtain the highest value for the assets so that the just debt may be repaid, but to destroy the value of the debtor and his assets and to obtain non-dischargeable debt that will prevent Alex Jones from exercising his freedom of press and free speech rights.
This court is the gatekeeper on issues of ulterior motives in bad faith.
A creditor may not cast his vote for an ulterior purpose and expect to have it counted.
Ulterior motives have been held to include pure malice, strikes, and blackmail and the purpose to destroy an enterprise in order to advance the interest of a competing business.
So, and what is the competing business?
The competing business is the Democratic Party talking points that are basically, hey, Trump's shutting down the government because he doesn't care about people when it's they want to give health care to illegals.
And we're saying, no, he's going to shut down the government because the Democrats are forcing his hand.
And now he could do a whole lot of other things.
He could do a lot of firings now and a lot of stuff that he couldn't do before now that there is a government shutdown.
The destruction of InfoWars brand and Alex Jones' ability to exercise his freedom of the press and freedom of speech is abusive, ulterior motive.
Ulterior motives which can constitute bad faith include pure malice, strikes, blackmail, and the destruction of an entity in order to advance the interest of a competing business.
Like I said, the competing business is essentially the entire Democrat Party platform.
And they've been after Jones since this organization and the people watching and the guests defeated Hillary Clinton back in 2016.
And that's where we're at.
So at 1 p.m. today, you can tune in to see if justice will prevail or if people acting in bad faith prevail.
Because in my opinion, that's what they're acting in is bad faith.
And if you read these documents prepared by Alex Jones' legal team, which finally, he's got a crack legal team.
And in one and a half days, they pulled out, you know, these 27 pages, which are biting.
I mean, it's a biting indictment of what these the Democrat Party law firms are trying to do.
And you can say, oh, they're not Democrat Party law firms.
Oh, no.
Well, one of the law firms that just signed on to the case is the partner is Kamala Harris's husband.
So I'm sure there's no Democrat Party chicanery going on there.
It's just coincidence.
And one of the law firms got cited by Trump for $40 million for lawfare, for practicing lawfare.
And they had to do $40 million in pro bono work.
Some of which it appears to be is being used in this case, in this Sandy Hook case.
Again, correct me if I'm wrong in terms of the Republican perspective, but Republicans have been lecturing America all year that they control the government and that they're jamming their policy preferences down the throats of the American people.
So how is it the case that at this particular moment in time, they're suddenly at the mercy of Democrats who are in the minority in the House or in the Senate when Donald Trump has consistently behaving like he's all-powerful?
Well, you know, for some people, a generic supplement choice that's less, you know, radical than the methylene blue, which is incredibly powerful, might make more sense.
Something like a methyl drive, a power plant, ultimate burning.
But especially if you're talking about younger people, methylene blue is radical power.
On Friday, the Democrat Party law firms filed an emergency hearing.
They had to have an emergency hearing this week.
It had to happen.
And so they filed it on Friday.
It was supposed to be for next coming Friday, which is in a couple days, but it got moved to Wednesday at 1 p.m.
And you can see the tweet there from Alex on X. Red Alert, Democrats want to shut down Infowars today in Houston federal court at 1 p.m.
There's the first four pages of the response that his lawyer, his crack lawyer team put together in just a day and a half.
It's a 27-page response.
But if you go to this article on InfoWars, Red Alert, the Democrats want to shut down Infowars today in federal court at 1 p.m.
It was just posted at 11.07.
There's two different scribbed links.
There's one to just the 27-page response, and then another one to the full 377-page response that also includes, if you take, take, get an overhead shot of this right here, our Supreme Court petition.
So, which normally this is bound in a nice book, and they actually bind it in leather.
It's leather-bound, and this goes to the Supreme Court, but you can actually go in and read all the arguments they make for the Supreme Court.
So that's in both of the, well, that's in the second scribbed link, which is in the article.
The first one is only 27 pages, but I do want to bring you back to a couple of these, and I want to get to more of these shutdown clips, especially we're going to go back in time and see what Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer thought about giving healthcare to illegals.
So basically, in our response, the court must assess the true interest being benefit by the questioned activity.
This is the activity of we're having fake auctions that don't really are really auctions.
They're just kind of these sealed bid processes, and we're going to give it to the person who doesn't have the highest bid, admittedly.
I mean, they admitted it on TV, according, but then you have to count in the concessions, what I believe the Onion CEO said, to determine whether the creditors is seeking to benefit itself in some way other than as a creditor acting on its claim.
It's a dual purpose.
Here, the determination is simple.
The creditors, the plaintiffs, are seeking a political gun control victory.
This is on page 23, by the way, if you want to follow along in your book, which plaintiffs define as the destruction of the Alex Jones brand of InfoWars.
This is the ulterior motive that is not permitted in the process of bankruptcy, whether reorganization or liquidation.
At both stages, the plaintiffs acted in bad faith on their ulterior motive.
This conduct is not an allowed motive of a creditor.
It is the motive of a political view bent on destruction of an opposed political belief.
This is lawfare.
This is what we're discussing right now: lawfare.
The conservative voice of Alex Jones by his political opponents, the far-left progressive movement seeking gun control.
This is what it's always been about.
It's been about gun control and Hillary Clinton losing.
I think that was the, that was the, to me, that was the catalyst that got this whole thing kicked off.
Hillary Clinton lost, and we had to find a way to make somebody responsible for that.
And they made a lot of people responsible.
You could look at the law affair.
We showed, I think I showed this on American Journal.
It was a montage of different mugshots of people that worked with Trump as his lawyers, as his advisors.
They all had to go in front and get frog marched and get mugshots.
Who have we seen so far?
Comey, and he gets to do it privately and this boutique, this boutique arraignment, which I think hasn't happened yet.
It's supposed to happen on Friday.
So the far-left progressive movement seeking gun control financed by such organizations is Bloomberg, and it supported Foundations, Every Town, and The Onion.
That's the political motive.
The political motive is not recognized in bankruptcy and cannot be rewarded by a federal court where the goal is wholly inconsistent with the rights of a legitimate creditor and the constitutional rights of the debtor.
See, you still have rights.
You can't just, you know, you lose a case by default judgments from a judge.
That doesn't mean you lose your constitutional rights, even though in that trial, there was some questionable stuff going on.
Jones couldn't say a lot of things or he would be held in contempt of court.
Which the judges said.
Because this bankruptcy court refused to permit the Connecticut and Texas plaintiffs to control the bankruptcy auction and trustee, the plaintiffs now oppose any auction of FSS assets.
That's free speech systems.
The plaintiffs have sought a fair and equitable distribution of have not sought a fair and equitable distribution of bankruptcy proceeds, but to control the bankruptcy assets to accomplish and abuse the bankruptcy process.
Most critically, this abuse involves the provision of the debtor of the right to future exercise constitutional rights, freedom of the press, and free speech.
Freedom of speech.
If the sale proceeds and it must be applied to those judgments as the creditors of the sale process and depending on the outcome of the appeals may even allow payment in full of one or both of the judgments.
Allowing the operation and protection of these assets has and will continue to be for the benefit of the creditors and the Jones estate until the sale concludes, which will not be the result if the state law execution sale is conducted or if the Connecticut plaintiffs acquire the assets in other than a fair, non-collusive process.
And that goes to an interesting footnote down here on 15.
Although the plaintiffs are free to acquire FSS assets through a fair bidding process for cash, the stated purpose of the purchase is to destroy the value of InfoWars or Alex Jones brand.
The perverted motive is addressed below and its impact on the claims allowance processes.
Now, here it is on, I guess this is section 50, not section 50, but line item 50, number 50.
Although the Connecticut plaintiffs have been consistent in their demand to destroy Jones' ability to earn an income from his exclusively owned persona, the image, the name, the voice, etc., to silence his free expression of political and other opinions as an on-air news media, not only that position is irrelevant to the economic interest of the bankruptcy system itself,
but also when it rises to the level of abuse of process that uses the bankruptcy system to accomplish an unconstitutional political goal, which is to take away Jones' First Amendment rights.
In fact, the abuse of process conduct, it is contrary to the bankruptcy fresh start.
Because after this bankruptcy, they're still going to be hounding Alex Jones, even where a claim is found to be non-dischargeable.
If the claims of Connecticut are to have its debt declared non-dischargeable, then it cannot under any good faith application of any bankruptcy policy approved by the Supreme Court or congressional intent be consistent with destroying the debtor's ability to earn an income to pay its non-dischargeable debts.
Because what they want to do is they want Alex to walk off into the sunset, never to be heard from again.
The voice that woke up millions upon millions of people out there.
Some of you are listening to me now.
You remember when Alex Jones woke you up.
Okay, that's the power they want to stop.
They want to stop the man who told people, hey, when you're reading this headline, let's flip a switch.
Boom, and let's look at it from a different perspective.
Not the perspective the mainstream media is feeding you, but the perspective of truth based on the Constitution.
They didn't like him being on YouTube and getting billions upon billions of views.
They didn't like that.
So they had to silence him back in 2018.
And then when he tried recently to get back on after they said, hey, we're going to allow people back on, then it became, oh, no, we're just going to do this sort of slow-phased rollout of just certain people.
You know, because the head of Google right there, Sundar Prachai, didn't like being chased through the halls of Congress, being told he's evil by one Alex Jones.
They didn't like that.
It's amazing.
This counterintuitive position to the definition is the definition of abuse of process or what we're calling lawfare, abuse of process, lawfare.
You can go back to page two.
We talk about denial of due process.
When a political agenda, as here, is the ulterior motive defined as taking a lawful legal position only to advance a contrary political agenda.
And that's basically where we're at.
And then you could go the conclusion.
That's the first 27 pages.
The next page after that, you can go read the Supreme Court arguments.
Alexander E. Jones, Free Speech Systems LLC petitioners versus Erica Lafferty et al.
respondents.
And that was written by Ben Brooks, Alan Doherty, and Shelby Jordan, along with a host of other paralegals and whatnot involved.
So I encourage you to go read those.
I actually sent a copy to Bob Barnes.
I don't know if he's going to be able to look at it.
And I want to jump from this.
So at one o'clock, we'll be tuning in and we'll let you know what the judge says in his judgment.
It could be quick.
It could be 15 minutes.
It could be an hour and a half.
I remember one night we were here in December 2024 on pins and needles till about, was it 1130 when he finally concluded?
He did what we call in the video world as recapping the day, but not recapping the day.
He recapped the entire case from front to back as he saw it and then said, I can't let this sale go through.
And I want to get to these flashback clips of Schumer and Hillary Clinton, but just to let you know, the way we're on air now is when you go out and you support us by buying products at the alexjonestore.com or infowarsstore.com.
But the alexjoneststore.com is where we have some amazing deals.
Right now, we're doing these buy one, get one free deals of different products.
It was methylene blue the first couple days.
Now, the last two, it's been ultimate creatine powder and we're blowing through it.
That's our biggest seller for the last couple of days, that and the colostrum, the bovine colostrum.
But right now, you can get ultimate creatine powder, buy one, get one free for a limited time.
This may be the last day.
It may go to another day, but don't wait.
Don't wait.
Open up that window in your browser right now and get one of these and you get another one free and you can try it out, especially if you're working out.
That's what historically creatine has been used by bodybuilders to build up muscle mass.
But now people are looking at it and going, wow, all these amino acids and these enzymes and stuff.
This is actually good for your brain.
Your brain is being run on creatine powder and it helps with mental function.
So check it out, thealxjonesstore.com for the ultimate creatine powder, buy one, get one free.
Ultimate creatine fuse fuels muscle gains, forging a leaner, stronger physique by boosting ATP production, enhancing muscle during high-intensity lifts.
It also sharpens mental focus for complex tasks.
Creatine supports brain phosphocreatine, boosting cognitive ability under stress.
Kind of what we've been on here for a long time at InfoWars.
We've been under the stress of bankruptcy, the stress of law fare, the stress of just being in the arena.
And so by people out there watching the show, getting the information and then acting upon it.
But by supporting us, that's how we'll continue to go.
We want to go longer.
Whenever this finally wraps up, we're going to go 19 hours.
That's one of my favorite shirts, actually.
Go back to that extra strength autism.
I mean, literally with that announcement that RFK Jr. and Donald Trump made about how Tylenol, in addition with the vaccines, is contributing to the autism epidemic because it's pulling out certain chemicals in your body.
I think it's the folic acid.
It's killing all the folic acid, which is what babies need.
I remember when my wife was pregnant, she was taking folic acid supplements that had these prenatal vitamins, have folic acid in them, because that's what you need to create a healthy baby, among other things, not smoking and drinking and getting exercise, but not being too stressed.
So good luck to all you mothers out there because we need more conservative kids and conservative parents having conservative kids.
So let's go to these time travel clips.
We're going to travel back in time.
We're going to go to Hillary Clinton first saying we should not give taxpayer-funded health care benefits to illegal aliens or encourage illegal immigration.
As to illegal aliens, we agree with you that we do not think the comprehensive health care benefits should be extended to those who are undocumented workers and illegal aliens.
We do not want to do anything to encourage more illegal immigration into this country.
We know now that too many people come in for medical care as it is.
We certainly don't want them having the same benefits that American citizens are entitled to have.
And then it goes to what difference does this make anyway at this point?
Now she doesn't care.
She's all in for it.
Now let's go to Chuck Schumer.
1996 rails against illegals getting tax-fair abundant benefits, but now he wants to shut down the government in order to give those people those same benefits and more people.
Because in 1996, the immigration levels weren't like what they are now.
So here's Chuck Schumer.
unidentified
This is an anti-fraud amendment.
All over where we go, people say, well, why can't you stop illegal immigrants or others from coming here?
And the number one answer we give our constituents is when they come here, they can get jobs, get benefits against the law because of fraud.
And here, the gentleman from Florida has put together the most effective anti-fraud measure we can find without it changing the actions of the government one bit.
And we find all this opposition.
Ladies and gentlemen of this chamber, what I worry about is that this bill, which started out with good intentions, whether you agree with it or disagree with it, is going to end up being the same kind of thing that the public gets angry with us on.
We say we're doing something and we do nothing.
Because every time someone makes a rational and small proposal to get something done, people say, well, what about this hypothetical, that hypothetical, et cetera?
I urge support of this amendment.
If you believe you want to stop fraud and immigration, you have no choice but to support this amendment.
Some even rappelled down from Blackhawks onto the rooftop in order to help secure that perimeter.
Now, they were searching for suspected members of the violent Venezuelan gang, Trende Aragua.
Of course, TDA has been designated as a terrorist organization under the Trump administration.
Now, it was the biggest show of force that we've ever seen on the ground here.
We had agencies, FBI, Border Patrol, ICE, and ATF, all involved here, and they were all looking for targets in that same exact building.
It was a five-story building.
It was a tall task for them, and anything could have gone wrong.
But luckily, the operations went pretty smoothly.
Preliminary reports show that about three illegal immigrants were arrested in this operation.
Some of them suspected Trende Aragua.
Now, we talked with Chief Gregory Bovino, who's running the operations on the ground for many of these ops in Chicago, and he had some words for people that are pushing back against his operations.
How about you live in the apartment next, next door to Trainedo-Aragua members that are trafficking in prostitution, guns, drugs, and taking advantage of American citizens in a violent way?
Why don't you live next to them and then see how much of a Gestapo or a Nazi we are?
Yeah, there was video two years ago in somewhere outside of Denver.
I think it was Aurora, Colorado, where they were literally menacing people open with guns, just walking around, pulling people out of their apartments, taking over apartments, squatting.
And the public officials and Mary were like, oh, no, it's not happening because they couldn't admit, they couldn't admit to any of these problems.
And then it's because they won't admit to these problems that the federal government has to come in and start cleaning up because the states aren't doing their job to protect their citizens.
The county sheriff's not doing his job protecting the citizens.
So you have to send in the federal assets.
This isn't a case where, like in the Bundies, where the feds were going in and trying to cull and steal his herd because of something he's been doing forever, which is letting them graze on their precious grassland, which is what you're supposed to do with these animals.
Since September 19th, officers from our fraud detection and national security directorate, working in teams, have conducted over a thousand site visits across the Minneapolis-St.
Paul area as part of this operation.
What they found should shock all of America.
Focusing on a list of over a thousand target cases involving more than 900 individuals, our officers encountered blatant marriage fraud, visa overstays, people claiming to work at businesses that can't be found, forged documents, abuse of the H-1B visa system, abuse of the F-1 visas, and many other discrepancies.
Over the course of the operation, our officers found indication of fraud, non-compliance, or public safety and national security concerns in nearly a little less than 50% of the cases interviewed.
Well, we don't have, I don't think we have time to get to this clip, but there were some ICE agents trying to get or ICE agents trying to pull some illegals into an elevator, and some protesters were getting in there and they got a little comeuppance.
And, you know, I don't celebrate that type of action from our government, but only when it's necessary.
And in this case, you got people that aren't following the law.
Well, you know, for some people, a generic supplement choice that's less, you know, radical than methylene blue, which is incredibly powerful, might make more sense.
Something like a methyl drive, a power plant, ultimate burn even.
But especially if you're talking about younger people, methylene blue is radically powerful.
So you just saw a quick video I shot at dinner Sunday night with my parents and my four amazing children.
I'm sitting there at dinner, and my mother starts talking about how great her hair looks and how great her skin is and how healthy my dad is because of bovine colostrum.
And I go, oh yeah, where'd you get that?
Three months ago, we got in the test samples.
We've been selling it for two months.
They're the very best.
I went and gave them a few canisters.
They're like, oh, yeah, that is your bovine colostrum.
The first two weeks of what a mammal puts off is so incredible.
It's just all these supernutrients, your immune system.
We have the best at thealexhowstore.com discounted right now.
And I am so excited about this because we did a survey a year ago to the alexhowstore.com customer said, what do you want?
They said, we want bovine colostrum.
We finally got it in and the reviews are insane from listeners.
The only thing that's getting better reviews, literally five stars, four and a half, is our ultramethylene blue.
So get ultramethylene blue, the best methylene blue, at thealxboxdor.com right now and bovine colostrum with a bunch of other supernutrients that supercharge it right now and it funds this operation.
And regardless when I was in Fow Wars, I don't own the AlexandrumStore.com.
So it's funny, the Alex Jones Network at AJN Live on X, other places.
My God, they've killed over 30 million people with the poison shots.
They flood us with fentanyl.
They're absolutely in every major public and most private schools with grants.
Secretly brainwashing your sons and daughters to think they're another sex and make them totally mentally ill and then be mutilated chemically or surgically.
It is a devil cult.
It's the same program worldwide.
It's BlackRock.
It's the New World Order.
It's the transhumanist on record.
They say the future's not human.
unidentified
They're building this nightmare world and we're simply saying no.
No, Klaus Schwab and King Charles and Barack Obama want you eating bugs while they eat riby because they're feudalists, greedy, hateful, demonic, trash.
And you don't hate them enough.
And you don't support the people fighting for you enough.
I'm not saying that to everybody, but in general, you don't detest these people enough and you don't love the people fighting for you enough.
Because if you loved yourself, you would understand these people have a predatory hatred of you and your family.
You know, and all the federal government is doing is trying to get rid of illegal aliens, something that the American people voted for.
The American people didn't vote for more illegals to come into the southern border.
And by getting rid of illegals, one, you're going to raise wages because then there's going to be less people taking jobs that most people want.
You know, you can't even be a carpenter in this country and make a good living wage because the wages have been driven down by cheap labor coming up from the South.
And it's not just Mexico, it's all South America.
And I'm not taking anything.
These guys are all hardworking.
I've seen a crew of Mexican guys get up there or Hispanics and roof a house in two days, a big house.
But these are jobs that were originally done by people who lived in this country and they were paid a better wage.
They were getting benefits.
Now, these guys come in with their family members and they go, hey, we're going to fit $1520 in an apartment because we don't have the same values as you, Americans.
And so we can hold our costs down and we're not paying taxes and we're getting all these extra benefits.
So we're already ahead up.
Look at our brand new trucks we're driving.
So you can't compete with that.
And then you have these companies that hire these people.
And they do it.
Well, you know, my competition's hiring them, so I got to hire them.
So it's a no-win situation until you get rid of the illegals.
So if you're illegal, get your ass out.
There's a clip 34.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who looks like death warmed over, says she just came out of the House chamber and she wants to protect Americans' health care.
She doesn't say American citizens, Americans' health care, because everyone in the world is now an American, I guess.
Just came off the House floor where Democrats in the House tried to get Republicans to hear our legislation that would keep the government open, lower health care costs, end the cuts, and save Americans' health care.
And Republicans ignored us and would not let us even take a step forward.
But I'll tell you this: Antifa is a terrorist organization.
They have been a terrorist organization for years.
I have been calling on the Trump administration, the first Trump administration, to designate them as a terrorist organization.
President Trump has now done so.
And I appreciate that.
It's the right thing to do.
And here's the critical piece: Antifa doesn't rise up organically.
It is paid for.
And here's what we must do: follow the money.
How much of Antifa is paid for by Qatar?
How much of it is paid for by Iran?
How much of it is paid for by Communist China?
And how much of it is paid for by left-wing billionaires like George Soros and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who also are massive donors to Democrats.
Part of the reason why the Biden administration and every Democrat in Congress turns a blind eye to the violence and terrorism of Antifa is the same people writing the checks are writing the checks and funding their campaigns.
I mean, millions and millions and millions of dollars.
That's how you get these people out there.
The ringleaders definitely get paid a lot.
And then you got the foot soldiers that are, you know, disgruntled kids who don't want to get a job or skaters.
You know, they just, they have parents who are taking care of them so they don't have to like really go out and earn a living.
So they're able to spend their time bitching about the country.
Somebody comes along and says, hey, you guys want to go riot?
Yeah, let's go riot.
And they think it's cool to riot, hit people with skateboards, but they don't want to do anything.
They don't want to do anything to help the country.
They're not going to join the armed services, although some of them have.
I mean, now we're starting to find.
Seems like some Antifa, some commies are in there, but Hegseth's going to bunch her out.
There's our old alien workshop skateboards.
That's a relic from a far gone day.
I've been in this building since I think they moved in here.
It was before I got here, December of 2008.
I showed up in February of 09.
So it's been a long run, which may or may not end today.
We got a federal court hearing today in federal bankruptcy court in Houston.
Judge Lopez will be hearing some arguments from both sides.
So we went over the 27-page document, which you can find on Alex's X or on InfoWars under the headline, Red Alert, the Democrats want to shut down InfoWars today and federal court at 1 p.m.
Because that's what they want to do.
They want to control.
And that's what these groups, Microsoft and Google, and Oracle and Palantir, all want to set up control grid systems because they have read the plans.
They've read Agenda 2030.
They've read Agenda 21.
They've read the Club of Rome documents.
And it's not about having people who are informed and making decisions and running their own lives.
No, it's about command and control.
So when people put out their Twitter videos, like check out this Palantir ad, but it's not really a Palantir ad, but it's showing you what these types of organizations are going to be doing to you in the future.
Reportedly, a Palantir ad advertising what the company's going to do with the social credit score.
The big question was, is this a real Palantir ad?
Well, we found out.
But first, here's a content creator on TikTok who believed it was real and gave his take on it.
unidentified
There is this new Palantir commercial ad that just came out that you guys need to check out.
You guys do remember who Palantir is, right?
The new data integration company that's helping the Department of Defense, the IRS, the DOD, a Doge, and Aldi, and ICE, ICE, the people's handling immigration.
But check this thing out, y'all.
This is crazy.
Good morning, citizens.
Your overnight account balances have been updated.
Time to start a productive day.
Final notice, your account balance is below 500.
You need 50 credits by the end of the day to avoid automatic eviction.
If you have missed work due to illness, you must provide a doctor's note to reclaim your credits.
I started seeing corporate media, New York Times, Washington Post, all these CIA back groups about two years ago start going, you know what, America?
There is a social credit score.
There is a mark of the beast.
There is this system of social credit score, and it's Palantir.
I'm like, wow, 15 years ago, Alexa listened to us in our houses, and you have Sentinel and the federal government AI, and you've got really the three big companies, Microsoft and then Jeff Bezos' Amazon and Larry Ellison's Oracle that run over 90% of all this.
It's already in place.
So why are we being told Palantir just invented this and did this?
And it's because Palantir is trying to come into the government with Trump and use this system against the deep state.
And I'm not defending that.
This is all a Trojan horse.
This is all completely out of control.
Even all the big tech heads admit AI will probably end humanity as we know it.
So I'm not defending what Palantir is up to.
I'm simply saying this system is already in place.
And if you look at Larry Ellison coming out recently and saying, AI is going to be great.
It'll control society, watch what you do, and make you behave yourself.
So all the attacks on Palantir is because Palantir is trying to muscle in to the trough and stick its nose into that and be used to carry out Trump's agenda, just like the Democrats in Denver recently turned off the federal license plate rating system that were put in decades ago with grants because it was being used by ICE to find illegal aliens.
So people need to know why you know about Palantir, but don't know about Oracle, don't know about Microsoft, don't know about Google, don't know about Amazon, all of it.
I want you to be aware of it all.
It's like saying only Israel can be corrupt.
I cover Israeli corruption all day.
Communist China, the drug cartels, Larry Fink, BlackRock, Big Pharma.
I want to cover all the predatory groups, not just focus on one.
And people say that's a distraction.
No, they're involved in the distraction.
Meanwhile, as I told you many years ago, it's now official.
Bill Gates at the UN level through international standardization, just like he's in charge of vaccines worldwide and your medical care, has now come out with the official UN report for the central bank digital currency and the standardized cashless society and the digital ID to get online that will then be your personal ID.
Bill Gates has already been given the keys to the digital kingdom.
It ain't coming with Palantir.
It's already here.
Australia, the UK, Canada, it's all going in right now to track and control everything you do.
And Kirk Starmer says, oh, it's to stop the boat migrants that George Soros and UN are funding that the Navy can grab and ship back.
So they use the replacement migration invasion they've run as the pretext to sell us on the control grid.
And really, it's to put in place everything you just saw that is in the fake Palantir ad.
Palantir didn't create that.
A PR firm whose symbol is a Trojan horse, how perfect for all this, they created it jumping on the hype.
If I wanted hundreds of millions of views a day, I'd talk Palantir, Palantir, Palantir.
If I want hundreds of millions of views a day, I would just talk about Israel killing Charlie Kirk.
If Israel killed Charlie Kirk, I'll go there.
But because the system is discredited, because nobody believes establishment corporate media, which is good, remember I pioneered exposing that.
Now the system knows how to pose as the alternative, as the outsider, as the resistance, and then they inject establishment messages through that.
That's what's happened.
So I'm not telling you what to think.
I'm not going over each story.
I'm simply saying, realize, when you see people claiming they're anti-establishment, they had a particular narrative that first came from the corporate media, you know, there's a setup.
All of this tech is oppressive.
All of it is a Trojan horse.
All of it is dehumanizing.
All of it, the international standardization is meant to go to direct brain chip interface with AI.
That's what's happening.
That's the reality.
And it's not being done from a perspective of empowering us, but a perspective of ending humanity as we know it.
As you've all know, Harari and others have said at the World Economic Forum, the future is not human.
Well, I know the future is human, and I'm here to defend the human future.
And that means I expose all points of the compass.
So this was a fake Palantir ad, but everything you see in that ad has been in place for at least nine years in Commons China.
It's not a futuristic nightmare vision or warning.
It's telling you what's already happened in the past.
So what you see here is not some futuristic vision of Palantir.
It's what's already currently happening, deployed by big tech and now rolling out via stealth in the West via Kiera Starmer and others.
And that, my friends, is the reality.
That's why you have to have a debate and a discussion about the market of the beast, about the antichrist system, and raise awareness of that so that the public gets engaged in the debate, so we take control of the future and all the technocrats manipulate us.
That's the reality.
That's the facts.
And that's what we're currently dealing with.
Not some futuristic 1984 vision, but a technocracy that's been here for a long time.
Be aware, get engaged, get informed, and use your power now because humanity with the Holy Spirit behind us is unstoppable.
We go now live to the White House with J.D. Vance.
Carolyn Lovin just made a statement about Trump.
Basically, while the Democrats were trying to get health care for illegals, and I have a clip on that where they admit it coming up as well, Trump was doing Trump RX to get cheap drug prices for Americans and also creating a new AI system to basically analyze all these studies to help find cures for pediatric cancer.
Well, thank you, Caroline, and good afternoon to everybody and good afternoon to everybody who's watching at home.
It's a tough act to follow, but let me just say a few things and then I'll take a few questions.
Number one, Democrats say that they care a lot about lowering health care costs.
And yet, when the president took historic action to work with the drug companies to lower prescription drug prices, the Democrats did nothing to help us.
In fact, we would have loved to have the Democrats helping us, but they didn't.
They talk about doing something.
They don't actually do the hard work of making it happen.
What they have done instead is to shut down the government because we won't give billions of dollars to healthcare funding for illegal aliens.
That is what has actually happened.
To the American people who are watching, the reason your government is shut down at this very minute is because despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of congressional Republicans and even a few moderate Democrats supported opening the government, the Chuck Schumer AOC wing of the Democratic Party shut down the government because they said to us, we will open the government, but only if you give billions of dollars of funding for health care for illegal aliens.
That's a ridiculous proposition.
Let me say two other quick things, and then again, I'll take some questions.
Number one, we all understand that Democrats and Republicans have policy disagreements.
Democrats want to do things.
Look, when Chuck Schumer and Akeem Jeffries were in here a couple of days ago, they made some suggestions that the president was more than happy to say, yes, let's sit down and talk about how we can solve the health care crisis that we inherited from the Biden administration.
But it's one thing to say that we should solve the health care crisis for Americans.
It's another thing to say that we're going to shut down the government unless we give the Democrats every single thing that they want, which, as Caroline says, includes giving billions of dollars of taxpayer funding for health care for illegal migrants.
That's ridiculous.
You don't have policy disagreements that serve as the basis for a government shutdown.
Let's have the conversation about how to fix American health care, about how to make health care more accessible.
As the president showed, he's more than willing to act on behalf of the American people for this very reason.
What you don't do is say, unless you do exactly what we want to do as congressional Democrats, we're taking hostage.
And the hostage, it turns out, is critical, essential services that the American people need.
Caroline talked about some of it.
Let me talk about some more.
Our troops are not getting paid starting today because of the Chuck Schumer wing of the Democratic Party.
We have people who require food assistance, low-income Americans who require food assistance who will not get it unless we reopen the government thanks to Chuck Schumer and his family.
In terms of health care, the reality is they're just not being honest.
The amount of money that actually is going towards people who are undocumented is such a small portion of the Medicaid cut or the Affordable Care Act, if at all.
And so we can argue that point, but the reality that even the vice president would acknowledge that anyone who looks at the numbers will acknowledge is 90 to 95 percent of the folks.
He's got some updates on, I believe, the Gen 6 pipe bomber case.
And also, we're going to talk about what's going on with the Charlie Kirk case.
And I haven't, we, you know, there was no pre-interview, so this will all be on the fly, but there's been a lot of, it seems to be the citizen journalists have come out and said we're going to start doing our own investigation because we don't trust what the FBI is doing.
How does that feel just overall in general that the basic, you know, the citizenry out there is going, we don't trust the FBI's investigation, whatever they're telling us, so we're going to do our own.
I mean, I think overall that's a good thing, but what does that say about the current state of the FBI in general?
A lot of people don't trust the FBI with good reason.
And I think people had two choices in front of them after what we experienced in 2020 and the way that COVID went down and the way the government overreach happened.
So we saw something really specific go down.
It was a mindset shift for Americans.
And they chose one of two paths.
And one path was, I don't believe anybody.
I think everybody's lying to me.
That's probably a pretty healthy thing to think.
And I'm going to be a skeptic.
So whatever information comes my way, I'm going to be very aggressive about how I evaluate it.
And I'm going to be distrustful first.
So I'm going to do a trust, but verify.
I'm going to do a, you know, you give me the information, the evidence.
I'll stay open-minded, but I'm not going to believe you just by default.
So that was one path.
And the other path is kind of a little bit more dangerous.
And we're seeing a lot of this go on out there, and especially if you follow stuff on X and you're watching the way that some people sort of evaluate what comes from the FBI, comes from the local prosecutors and so on and so forth.
They say, whatever I want to believe is good because everybody's going to lie to me anyway.
So I'm just going to believe my own thing.
And I don't need any evidence because my opinion is already formed.
And so whatever I find is going to be justifiable and I'll just create the sort of path of facts as I go along.
I think it's really dangerous.
And I think that comes from this place where, you know, the American attention span has fundamentally changed.
Let's call it in the last 20-something years.
Well, when you and I grew up, you used to have to wait for a show to show up.
It would, you know, be on Fridays or it'd be on Thursdays or it'd be on some specific day of the week and you'd have to wait through commercials as you were doing it.
You know, today we can binge watch everything.
We can see all the things we want all the time.
If you want to go watch every episode of the X-Files, you can go get it right now.
You can buy it and you can have it at your fingertips and you can play it from your TV without even having an extra device.
And we have that same mentality about questions we have about going on in the world.
Like we just, we expect to have it available to us and it's not.
And our system is actually not built for that.
So the other day, I think it was yesterday or the day before, there was some of this preliminary hearings going on in Charlie Kirk's defense or the assassin's defense.
So he steps up into court and he's got a public defender, which is never a great thing for somebody who's going through this.
It shows that he doesn't have the money to pay for a big firm.
And this is going to be a totally costly and very labor-intensive thing.
And the public defender said, hey, we have a huge amount of discovery coming our way and we need every bit of time that the court is willing to give us to be able to evaluate it.
Because we know that, that tells us that the people in the public sphere that are over on social media doing the citizen journalism or they're doing their own speculation investigations, you know, I'm going to put investigations in air quotes because you're not actually able to investigate.
You don't have the evidence.
You don't have what the local police and the state police and the FBI were able to gather.
You don't have access to all of the, you know, the numerous interviews they did.
They said they did over 200 interviews of people that were just in there from every single angle that it happened.
People coming and going, people that were seeing the potential egress routes.
So there's a ton of information that is not public.
And I, you know, I'm believe me, I'm skeptical about a lot of these things with this current shooter.
One, you know, they're, they've shown some photos of somebody was taking photos of the cops collecting evidence at this grassy area and the gun's not even in the shot.
So that, that to me is like, whoa, that's weird.
But we don't know when those photos were being taken, if the gun had already been removed and they didn't want it to be shown.
I mean, there's a lot of things you don't ever know in these situations, but people see something and they go, well, there's no gun here.
I mean, if he had competent attorneys there, it would have taken a lot longer and they would have evaluated things.
And yeah, obviously, and he tried to stab himself in the neck when the verdict was read.
So not a guy who made great decisions, I would say, across the board.
But when you get right down to, you know, the way our system is designed, you're not supposed to put this stuff out.
And there are explicit Supreme Court decisions in case law that will actually preclude the release of some of this information.
I would actually argue, and this is not going to be popular with people, and I understand why, but I think that the FBI actually made some serious missteps and they put too much information out there, but not enough for people to quote unquote solve the case to their own sort of, you know, their own comfort level.
And so they gave a lot more information than is generally acceptable.
And they may actually have endangered the prosecution at some level.
So we have to kind of, we kind of have to do the Occam's razor.
Yes, the government lies to us on a regular basis.
Yes, they hide facts.
That's a regular thing.
You're dealing with the FBI, which is famously opaque.
There are places where they can't share information.
And when you have a live suspect or a subject that is being prosecuted, that's one of them.
By the way, there's no federal case that I've seen yet.
I've been looking and I don't see a federal case dropping on this guy.
So this is only a local or a state charge.
It's a local prosecution.
The FBI's role has basically been in a law enforcement assist thing.
But then there's places where we've got other questions, like what happened at Butler PA, and that subject is dead.
So he has no right to privacy.
He doesn't get tried in a court.
So it doesn't really matter whether or not we sort of destroy his reputation.
And people have tons of questions about that.
And I think what folks are doing is they're taking, I have questions about one thing and they are projecting it across the entire spectrum.
And I understand why.
But as it's just a reminder, our system is designed to be slow and, you know, deliberately plotting and sort of inefficient for the reasons that it's supposed to be fair.
It's fair-ish, I guess, and as good as we're going to get on earth.
And so we probably have more than we need or what we're allowed to see.
And I think we might see some defense motions that actually mention a tainted jury pool that they're going to say that too much information was gone out there to bias the public because people have already convicted or not convicted this guy.
They've already decided that it was either Israel or something related to that, some nation state actor without any evidence, or they decided it was this guy and he should hang and there should be a public execution.
And I've seen both sides of that coin.
And neither one of those is the way our system is designed.
And, you know, I see people saying, hey, if you're putting information out there, you're potentially giving the defense a chance to get this guy off if he indeed did it, which 100%.
So, Rob, one of the worst things that happened is that people who were friendly with the victim injected themselves in the public sphere in the case.
And that's going to be people like Dan Bongino and Cash Patel showing up on scene.
The number one rule for law enforcement is if there is not just a conflict of interest, but the appearance of a conflict of interest, you have to recuse yourself.
If you had a family member that was involved in a car accident and you were the patrol officer who pulled up on it, you would hold the scene for safety and bring in another officer.
So there's no impropriety, even like from the observation outside, even if you were a totally legit and maybe didn't even like the family member and you were going to do a fair job.
You don't want the appearance of impropriety.
So to jump in there is going to give the defense all kinds of reasons to say, hey, these guys are personal friends.
They went out and talked about being personal friends.
They went out and held press conferences saying, you know, we're going to see you in Valhalla.
Why is that guy in any way, shape, or form walking the scene of the investigation?
I don't care if he's the FBI director.
You know, if it was a case agent, you'd have to recuse.
If it was a supervisor, they'd have to recuse.
The FBI director, same story.
You'd have to recuse yourself.
So they've created like actually more muddy water than necessary.
And of course, people are going to be concerned and worried and they distrust the government for various good reasons.
You know, all that distrust is earned over the last half decade to a decade at the very minimum.
So I understand why, but I just, it's a bad situation all around for this.
And, you know, the sooner they can get to the next phase and the discovery can be done and the, you know, the prosecutions can start submitting some actual memos, or we see some federal charges.
You know, we'll get some more information and a probable cause statement from the feds if they decide to do it.
Then all those things will be more information that we don't have right now.
Yeah, because the feds will actually write up a whole case that'll have all their, I guess, evidence batches laid out.
So people can then follow along and go, okay, well, the feds are saying this and this and this and this.
And then people will go back and then look at that and verify it with other things they're talking about.
Now, just a couple of things.
Candace Owens has been doing her own investigation.
I'm sure you've got your opinions on that, but she did show a picture supposedly of the shooter at a dairy queen, which is, you know, around, I think, 13 minutes after the shooting happened.
And then she's supposedly talked to the parents and they said they didn't turn him in.
I mean, there's a lot of weird stuff going on there.
I've seen a lot of Candace Owens videos in my feed online.
And so I catch a lot of that sort of secondhand.
And the evaluation that I have from looking at it is Candace Owens is not a trained investigator.
This, I don't know when that timestamp is and it's not substantiated to me.
If there's somebody from Dairy Queen that has gone out and said, yes, this is from the time.
This is how we got it.
You know, I don't, I don't know anything about what she's claiming to say.
But I've also seen her sort of have these conflicting statements where she says nobody says the word vehicle when they're 22 years old.
And then you can find that she actually clipped that out of a body camfoot, you know, a little snip.
And right after the part where she ends the clip, the guy ends up saying the word vehicle.
And there's dozens of examples of her saying the same words.
So there's some people that have been kind of working through the debunking.
Again, I'm a trust but verify kind of guy.
I'm skeptical.
I don't know what access Candace Owens has to anything.
I saw that there was a text message that was allegedly from people from TPUSA, but TPUSA doesn't seem to be claiming it.
So again, I don't need to make a decision and I'm not on that jury and I'm not actually doing an investigation.
And I would argue that neither is she.
She's saying things.
It's really good for clicks.
And it certainly has like filled up my timeline.
Whereas like when I went to bed last night, it was actually probably the first time I've ever seen this.
There must have been 20 Candace Owens clips, either for or against what she was saying.
And I thought, man, she's got a full media blitz on this, which is great for impressions and is great for, you know, getting your awareness out there on your podcast.
But at the end of the day, I don't know that it moves anything forward.
And if she's wrong about everything, what happens?
Is there any consequence?
Not really.
If there is a failed prosecution into somebody that actually did a crime, then I think you're going to have some real serious meltdowns.
And for all the claims that are made, it's like, well, you can't just say something and say, just trust me, bro.
That's why we don't like what the government says.
They try to lean on this argument to authority.
And access is not the same thing as actually having evidence.
Yeah, I think you've covered that pretty well looking at the pros and cons of doing it.
Because I think, you know, we are supposed to be at the end of the day, the check and balance for the government.
But we're not all trained investigators.
She's definitely not, I don't think she's stupid, but she's putting out a lot of statements out there, but then not, and she's saying, hey, you guys got to say, is this true or is this not?
I mean, she said the other day that, you know, Turning Point was going to bring her back.
And, but I don't know if anybody's verifying that and that Charlie was going to do all these things.
She did show a memo that he was going to do a Doge investigation into all the money coming in, which I thought was, that was pretty interesting.
That was like, okay, this is a memo from Turning Point.
It shows that, yeah, there's a lot of money flowing in and out.
And when things happen like that, money does trickle into different places.
And he was probably seeing that going, wait a minute, what's going on?
And so I do agree with that.
Alex Jones was actually just in here.
He wants you to stay until 5 after.
He's got some questions for you at 5 after.
But let's turn the attention.
You also had some updates on the, of course, another unsolved mystery in the most secure place in the United States, the Washington, D.C. area, where we had a pipe bomber walking around dropping bombs.
And no one seems to know who this person is.
But I think we do know.
And in our hearts, we know he's probably connected to the government in some way, shape or form.
What's funny is, is what was revealed yesterday or the day before with this sort of unveil.
And first of all, the route is always suspicious.
So I do a lot of meta coverage of the media.
And one of them is who's breaking the story and why are they breaking it?
So this is a story you guys are showing from Revolver News.
That's Darren Beattie.
He now actually works for the government.
So that's kind of interesting.
They're quoting Julie Kelly, who I found to be a, let's say, decidedly unreliable type.
She has an agenda.
She hones in on Minutia without being a trained investigator, without being a paralegal or an attorney.
And she kind of comments like well over her skis on a lot of stuff.
And the thing that she got super excited about in that story and the big break is that they revealed the interview with the woman who found the pipe bombs on January the 6th.
And the interview was after what's called the N Talk complaint or intake form.
So NTOK is the National Threat Operations Center.
It's the FBI's like 1-800 tip line, but you can also read them.
So you can go there and you can submit a tip for any number of things.
By the way, that's the way that almost all of our January 6th stuff came in.
So when we were getting them and we got leads, what we call leads by the hundreds of thousands where people were making allegations against folks with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
They just had personal grievances and they were as bad as like, oh, I knew Rob.
Like he was in high school and he thought Rand Reagan was cool.
So he's a real a-hole and he was probably at January 6th.
Like that's the kind of quality of stuff that we got written up.
And so they'd be like, you should go find him.
I think he lives in St. Louis or maybe Texas, you know, like stuff like that.
So we would get those.
And one of them was this woman who actually ended up finding the pipe bomb or the whatever, you know, the pipe bomb looking device that was out there behind, was I think it was the DNC.
Sorry, it was behind the RNC.
And so she supposedly found this when she was on her way back from getting her laundry.
And so the big reveal that they had yesterday that was like, you know, breaking, breaking news is that she went to go drop her laundry in at noon and she came back to get her laundry at 1240.
So she estimates that the bomb was placed there during those 40 minutes.
And that's the right amount of skepticism to have.
So the assumption would be that she was 100% alert and aware.
By the way, when she described where the bomb was, she said she initially thought it was just trash and that it was some sort of garbage that had not made it into the trash can.
And then she pulled back and revealed like an explosive device or looking device.
And that's when it was a big deal.
And she saw the number 20 on there on this like, you know, ticking counter.
And so the FBI has kind of alleged that it was placed the night before, that it was a J5 plant overnight, that it was the same person that dropped both the devices.
And they think they kind of know who this person was.
And we've seen this, you know, a wanted poster and a $500,000 reward.
And it's the white hoodie and the Nikes and the whole deal that everybody's gone down this rabbit hole and everybody got an idea who it is.
But what's crazy is, is that people are so desperate to find something new that they're willing to look at some woman's statement.
And it wasn't even the statement on the day.
She actually says it two days later.
So she recorded her tip to NTOC on January the 8th.
And she typed it all up because she obviously wanted to be interviewed and said, if you guys want to find me, here I am.
They interviewed her a week later.
And she said, yeah, it had to be this because I'm so alert and so aware when I'm doing something else, when I'm taking my laundry, I know.
if there was a bomb there or not.
And like, for me, that doesn't pass the sniff test.
It's like, okay, maybe, maybe so, or not, you know, like that was the big break in the story.
The thing that I found most interesting is that John Solomon did a report talking about the new releasing this and some of the actual information from the FBI regarding their evaluation at the explosive research center and the stuff they did at the demo range and what they call the render safe team.
And when they did the evaluation of the pipe bombs in blatant contradiction to congressional testimony, there's nowhere in the entire report that says that these bombs were viable, which, by the way, I've been saying for three plus years, because that's what I was briefed the week after January 6th.
For folks who don't know, I used to be an FBI agent.
I was actually assigned to a team that did surveillance full-time.
And so we had specialized training and equipment.
And that's what was our task.
And we actually went and sat on a person of interest a couple of days after January 6th.
I don't know the exact days.
And we were sitting on a house in Northern Virginia doing observations.
And of course, when you do something like that, you get a brief on who are we watching and why are we watching them?
And what are we looking for?
And what kind of case is this?
And what are the sort of details you can share?
And the details that were shared with me standing in the parking lot of a fire station was that this person had been connected to, but wasn't necessarily the person that dropped the bombs.
That was part one.
And part two was that those devices looked very bomb-like, but in fact, were not actually capable of exploding, which is really relevant if you're an agent in the field and you want to know, hey, what's my posture?
I had a family emergency right before the broadcast today.
So much is coming together.
There's a federal hearing in Houston at 1 p.m. where they're openly trying to shut us down for the 15th time.
We barely survived each time.
So people kind of take it as cry wolf.
No, it's like people live in a long war and survive by the blessing of God.
And I was listening when I was driving back in from my home where I had to deal with an issue to you and Rob talking, but I know you're getting into J6, but we're almost out of time.
How big is it that Ray testified all those times that there weren't any FBI agents at J6?
Or he later he didn't know that any.
Now we know 274 at least plain clothes.
Then you've got all the NGOs and the Antifa and you have the men in black that look very police officers or federal agent.
They were put together with an Antifa, but dressed like Antifa, breaking through the windows.
Then they fake arrest some of them.
Then they take the handcuffs off and high-five them with the Capitol police.
I mean, this thing is really unraveling.
So isn't that something good Cash Patel finally did?
Because he said they'll start releasing the information on J6 and I guess through Congress, or is there a lot more coming?
But I think we kind of just, not you or I, but the media kind of just glazed over that huge news breaking last week.
And what's interesting is it was initially touted exactly like what you just said, that there were 274 FBI agents in the crowd.
They used the word plain clothes in the news releases.
Same guy, by the way, John Solomon, who just got this release about J6.
So this is kind of an easy segue to it.
They talked about 274 agents.
But if you read into the actual text of the document that was released, they explicitly mentioned that these are mostly response, that people that were responding after the fact.
Now, I have a unique experience because I actually worked for that same FBI field office on that day.
I was actually in Frederick, Maryland.
I was training with a bunch of state cops.
I had friends that were in the Washington field office and they have text messages that are contemporaneous to that time.
There was an all call for about a third of the FBI's staff to respond to January 6th after 3 p.m., which is well after the breaches, well after the Capitol was like, you know, having people walk around in it.
And I don't think that what people have presented on the left is an accurate representation.
There was obviously a riot.
There were obviously some people that got violent, but there was a lot of people that just were like what my buddy Steve Baker refers to as accidental tourists.
They just kind of wandered around a place and they stayed within those red ropes and so on.
And we saw those videos.
So there's been this big, I think, misunderstanding of what the 274 is.
And I'm going to ask you to use Occam's razor here, Alex, because when Has Patel went out and tried to, he tried to walk that back over the weekend.
He was like, hey, hey, hey, what I'm saying is, is they were actually responding.
Consider this because you're a guy who's seen enough, you know, PSYOPs and operations the government has pulled on the American people.
Would it ever really make sense for the same agency that, let's say, incited actions on January 6th to also be the same ones who investigated it?
And my argument to you beat is that that's not reasonable.
It's not very likely.
I've always said that it was unlikely that the FBI was the inciting factor there and that they were the ones who actually both kicked it off and then turned around and prosecuted it.
Mostly because you'd have guys like me.
There's a pretty conservative workforce, especially in the agent population.
Well, let me just back you up because I've studied the real false flags like Oklahoma City and stuff.
They sent senior managers from German intelligence, CIA, FBI, and ATF.
I mean, senior, like deputy heads that literally, I interviewed multiple credible people that worked at HUD, witnesses, police officers, you name it, the ones they didn't kill.
And they saw the press conference that day after the bombing and were like, those are the men that were in the maintenance hallways and the maintenance stairways.
We asked, what are you doing?
Oh, we're work with the phone company.
And multiple witnesses said it was gray sticks of butter and wiring.
Compartmentalization, 274 is too big of a number to be a bunch of senior guys.
And the big difference between Oklahoma City and what happened on January 6th is a thing that's called the Department of Homeland Security.
That didn't exist in the 90s.
That is a post-9-11 construct.
And I've said this since the first time that I started speaking publicly.
I don't know for a fact that this is the case, but it's been always my instinct that if you were going to lean on an agency, wouldn't you lean on the agency that doesn't have any rules?
And there are groups within DHS, HSI, they don't have any of the guidelines or the requirements for reporting confidential human source work and some of the other things that you have to do under the DOJ's guidelines.
There are no policies that you're violating.
You're actually operating in kind of a wild west.
Now, generally, they don't do nearly as much as they could, but the possibility of actually exercising that.
He has got an incredible batting average up at about a thousand.
But when he comes on, as I was listening to the card where I'm going to go to the office of this family emergency, and he's talking about, listen, it's true, the average FBI agent is not corrupt or out.
They might be left as political people and they might violate our rights, but they're not like in conspiracies.
And quite frankly, they're just not that badass.
And I don't mean that in a good way.
Okay.
No, it's the Delta Force.
It's the Green Berets that do that.
It was the Delta Force killed everybody at Waco.
McVay was assigned a Delta Force.
They set him up as the Patsy.
And it's the Green Berets that go around and stage false flags and do color revolution uprisings.
That's what they're trained to do.
WikiLeaks, of course, leaked some of their classified stuff.
And it was at certain school levels of it.
They teach him how to do that.
And there's force multipliers.
We want to think that our government in the past wasn't doing evil stuff.
They've been training Special Army personnel and officers to do really nasty stuff for a long time.
Let's just stop right there.
And we're talking torture.
We're talking force multipliers where you kill a kid in the village and hang him up and then blame the enemy.
And the argument is we're going to save the whole village because you did this.
And this is, and it's real dark side stuff that Jick Cheney talked about.
Sometimes you got to operate on the dark side.
But I've agreed with him the whole time.
That's what I've known.
And that's what Jeremy Brown and others said is it was definitely specially selected groups out of DOD who were then compartmentalized into CIA or contractor groups that were the main ones breaking through.
I don't think those were FBI agents per se breaking through the windows.
But Kyle, you also had one other thing you wanted to hit.
We're almost out of time, but I want to get you back soon on Blanche, the deputy attorney general, because now I've got it from a whole bunch of sources.
Not Ed Martin, he wouldn't talk about him.
Other than saying, oh, I got to go out of here for a minute.
He's calling me.
I go talk to him.
And I said, oh, how's he doing?
Oh, he's great.
Wouldn't say anything.
But everybody else I talk to, they just say he is the bad guy.
So what I argue is that the status quo is undefeated.
And I don't know who's always backing the status quo.
It seems like there's always somebody that steps up right at the moment to back it.
And so we get the same old thing.
We get the same old, you know, that's why kind of I love government shutdowns.
They're my favorite because shut it down.
Let's not pay for it.
And let's see what shakes out in the wash when we go for a couple of months without that.
It won't happen.
They always end up caving.
Everybody does because everybody thinks that we need all these institutions.
But at the end of the day, I don't need any of them.
And most of the time, if you'd wake, like I'm pretty sure you woke up this morning with the government shutdown, Alex, and you had the exact same experience you did the day before.
You know, the lights turned on, the garbage men still showed up.
Your car still starts when you drive.
You know, the traffic is whatever it is.
It's just, it's just not all that important.
And yet we have this outsized influence by the federal government, if nothing else in our minds.
And then there's these small things that affect a ton of people with very, very minimal, you know, very minimal personnel.
So you screwed up the lives of like 2,000 J6ers and they haven't all been made whole yet.
And they certainly haven't had any settlements.
And some of those guys, like we said, Biggs, still not pardoned.
I have been called a trillion times a conspiracy theorist by the corporate media.
Maybe that's an exaggeration a billion times.
I mean, just constantly.
Those thousands of articles a day.
And that term was developed in 1963, early 64.
It was later declassified in the 70s in the Senate Frank Church committee hearing 76, 77, 78.
The CIA created that term when you can't argue with the facts.
Just say, oh, they're conspiracy theorists.
Well, like Elon Musk said a few years ago, we need new conspiracy theories because they all came true.
Well, they were already true.
But in the past, most of the public still bought into whatever official stories were.
And that made it really easy for the deep state corporations, corrupt groups to get away with a lot.
But now, because there's so much understanding and people know what to look for, there's so many investigators online, some credible, some not, you know, some that mean well, some that don't mean well.
We all make mistakes.
But there's so much focus now and so many cameras and so much metadata that it's really hard for the deep stating groups to get away with things.
I mean, they get caught.
So now they mainly go to provocateur operations or they'll piggyback on somebody else that they've got wound up to do something.
But three weeks ago, today, if I'd have come on air day one and said Israel did it, we'd had billions of views and we'd be a hero.
If I would have said, oh, one of the security guys goes under his arm and they say it's a gun, we blew it up.
Looks like a cell phone.
People were mad at me for, you know, people were mad at me for not coming out and saying, no, that guy's the killer.
And then they had another guy behind him to an angle.
They say, it looks like one of those cell phone guns.
And you blow it up.
It looks to me like a bottle of water and he's screwing the top off.
So you got all that.
But that doesn't mean I buy into the official story and it took time to ferret through it and have ballistics experts on and Navy SEALs and Delta Force and Green Berets.
See them every day on.
None of them.
None of them or their communities.
So we're talking about thousands of people in the aggregate.
None of them buy the official story.
And then you've got what looks like a chat GPT letter to his boyfriend and you've got all the time code inconsistencies and then the bullet that we only learned about that a week and a half ago, two Saturdays ago that goes, a 30od6 goes in and bounces off at 200 yards off of his spinal cord.
That is basically impossible.
And I've been a big game hunter.
I mean, but anybody knows that.
I mean, I've shot Elk at 300, 400 yards with 30 odd six.
It was right to the side and it comes out.
Well, 30 odd six, only time I shot one once.
Three giant holes.
You know, the bullet broke up, but like a four-inch, two-inch, one-inch, gone.
Elk falls over.
Ten with 300 wind mags.
So I know that.
That's impossible in my view to hit somebody in the neck.
Now they say, well, it went down and then bounced back up.
Well, we better get this autopsy.
Was there one?
Wasn't there one?
They say there is.
We better see the bullet, but how do we know?
So talking to so many experts out there, our next guest information just comes up over and over again.
And I've actually got his bio right over here.
I had a family emergency.
So I was literally like skidding into home plate here.
It's about 15 minutes ago.
And that's Chris Martinson.
And he has a PhD in pathology, toxology from Duke University, an MBA from Cornell as a best-selling author, writer, and proprietor of Peak Prosperity website, Community, which is dedicated to performing rock-solid analysis and helping people become prepared for whether is about to happen next.
Peakprosperity.com.
And so he's been on before, highly respected.
But talking to someone who I respect, they say, Dr. Chris Martinson, he has the best analysis.
So I'm going to try to, as best I can, give him the floor to start wherever he wants.
He's going to have control with his own video feed to show you these exhibits.
But now, three weeks in, we know a lot more.
And I think we know this.
Correct me if I'm wrong, Doctor.
We're being fed a line of bull, which then becomes a fertile ground.
You know, for whatever the latest theory is, we'll try to hone in on the reality.
You know, for me, we always look at who benefits.
And I think it's important to look at both, but we need to find out actually what hit him, the specifics of who really shot him.
Then we can start tracking who to blame.
There's obviously a lot of different groups that would stand again.
The DNC, the RNC wanted to take control of the organization.
Not saying they did.
Israel certainly is capable of these type of activities.
Could it be a Soros group?
I mean, who knows?
We'll let Dr. Chris Martinson give his analysis on this from every angle.
Hey, Alex, it's so great to be back with you again.
I think the last time was around the Butler shooting.
So this isn't my first rodeo analyzing these sorts of events.
And I have to say that I think that they learned something from the Butler side because we don't have that many videos to work with.
We're working with a real paucity of information.
If I could just write up front, we need more information.
We need the videos from the stairwells, from the UVU cameras, from the TPUSA cameras.
We need the audio from Charlie Kirk's mic.
We don't have any of that.
We don't have an autopsy.
So what we're going on is a little thin.
But what they told us, I can prove is wrong, I think, right?
And that is that a gentleman named Tyler Robinson was sitting on a roof and took a shot with a 30-aught six.
Now, how that rifle got to the roof, we don't know.
They say, oh, he must have disassembled it, stuffed the pieces, the stock in the barrel down into his pants.
But you, as a shooter, would know this.
You would never reassemble a longboard rifle like that with a bunch of screws and think that it was going to be anything close to zeroed in when you got there.
So if I could start here, this is the tent that Charlie was sitting under.
He was just under that apex right there.
This is in that UVU courtyard, and it steps up those grass steps and concrete pieces.
This is where they said he was on the edge of the Low C building.
There's an area circled there.
You maybe could sort of see a little stuff there, but when we dial in, you can see they have a bunch of evidence tags here showing where there was some imprints putatively because somebody was lying down, elbows and knees in a shooting position.
But we can see here the overall angle from here down to the tent.
There's a shot.
There's absolutely a shot you can take there, no question about it.
The problem we have with that is that these are those indents a little closer.
The problem we have with that angle of the shoot is that it just can't work out.
First off, it's about a 10 degree downslope.
So flat, zero degree would be you're on flat ground, I'm on flat ground.
We have a zero degree slope.
Given that angle, it's about 140 yards.
I've measured it and that's 10 degrees down.
Also, not straight on Charlie, but just about 10 degrees off, just a little off.
So we're coming in at what we're calling a 10 and 10.
That generally means like Kennedy shot from the front, his head goes back into the here.
unidentified
So this, you're saying just the obvious body motion looks like he's being shot from where I'm going to have to say it's coming in at a really steep angle.
It has to come in because it's landing in his body.
And to get there, this is the Mitchell X. Look at this high-speed.
This is a 300 blackout.
It doesn't have near the force of a 30-odd 6, but it shows very nicely what happens, which is that cavitation event that happens when a high-speed round lands in something like this is ballistic gel meant to mirror a human body.
You see that huge overexpansion.
That's because the bullet's dumping all of its many hundreds, if not thousands of pounds, foot pounds of energy into a liquid.
And liquids hate to expand.
So what do they do?
They go and they create this is called a cavitation bubble.
Boom.
Now, you need to, this is about a one-one-thousandth of a second thing.
So you have to have very high-speed photography.
I think it was completely fortuitous that we had a single frame that caught at least part of that process, but it's very clear we can see that expansion in his neck.
We're all operating off of what the spokesman, who literally, when I responded to him 10 minutes after he posted his thing two Saturdays ago saying, oh, he's a man of steel.
It just went in and went, you know, and he goes, I don't want to get too graphic here because I don't upset people.
He literally calls me 45 minutes after I did a post saying, I don't buy this.
He was very nice.
And then gave me more of what the surgeon said.
But I totally agree with you, Dr. Martinson.
We need to get, well, what have you heard about the autopsy?
We hear the dispatcher saying no autopsy.
We should come to get the body.
But now we're hearing from TPUSA there will be one later in October.
I don't have a lot to go on there, but I can almost definitively at this point rule out being shot from the front because there's zero chance you know this.
Help your listeners figure this out.
A bullet doesn't just magically start going different directions because it enters a body.
With that first bullet, assuming it's a relatively standard 30-odd six hunting round, which it probably was, if that's what it was, it's carrying about 2,200 foot pounds of energy.
That means if I had a 2,200 pound block and I dropped it from a foot, clunk, that's a ton, right?
That's how much power this has.
So bullets do not do goofy things when they have all of the initial energy.
When they go in, it goes through big bones and then starts to break up later.
But usually you'll hit a big bone and it'll still only expand, you know, maybe to an inch or so.
Then it starts breaking up after it's expended its energy, but still there's such that cavity you're talking about, such a blast force that it just blows right through.
I mean, I'm talking about through Buffalo, through you naming.
So this is one of the most powerful, you know, rounds when you start getting into that super magnum scale.
And I just, all the hunters, everybody knows this is just horse crap.
It is absolutely, I mean, again, anybody knows you shoot somebody 200 yards with a standard round, standard load, 30 odd six.
If you hit them right perfectly in the vertebrae, the thickest part, you've got that tiny hole in the front and a 30-odd six is so high-powered, it wouldn't even have time to open up.
So I would imagine an inch and a half, two-inch hole in the back because the bullet's going to come out in a mushroom, but not broken up yet.
I mean, I'm telling you, I don't think it would even begin to break up shooting through a neck.
And of course, we haven't seen any pictures of the remaining two cartridges in the putative gun that they found wrapped in a towel conveniently nearby.
If we could see those, now we could start making some more guesses and more informed decisions about things.
If it was full metal jacket, like if he had standard like ball rounds that the military use, I personally, with an M1 Grand, have holes right through 14-inch pine trees using ball ammo.
If it did, it had to take out the spine below the thoracic one level because if it took out the spine above that in his neck anywhere, he's now flaccid.
You can't, there would be no muscle tone because those nerves would be destroyed.
And we need to see the X-rays because look, come on, Alex.
It's like that magic bullet in the Kennedy thing, right?
This bullet allegedly goes through Kennedy's neck, tumbles around, smashes Connolly's thigh, and then is found on the gurney completely unmolested as a whole unit.
That's just not how these things work.
So if this was a hunting round of some kind, wasn't ball ammo, well, it's going to be in fragments if it did that much damage to the spine.
It just, that's just, it's going to be leaving pieces.
Now, maybe they found a big chunk of it and they're calling that the bullet.
But if they find an intact bullet that magically went all the way tumbling through his body and bounced back up and isn't destroyed, I'm going to be very suspicious.
I think you would too.
It just doesn't make any sense.
But a lot of things in this story just don't make sense.
And I've been hearing from people that, you know, they have, they think they have video evidence, but nobody seems to be interested in it.
You know, it's just like the FBI washing down the hose with the hose, the roof of that thing in Butler the next day.
It's just, there's things here that you wouldn't do during a normal course of an active investigation unless you were absolutely positive you had the perp and there was nothing more to be learned.
But all right, Chris Martinson, I know you don't like to, Dr. Chris Martin said, I don't like to speculate, but just in general, all the theories that have been disproven, some that haven't, this atmosphere and why all the military community I know do not buy the official story.
And the smartest guys I talk to, none of them say they know what happened, but they all agree with what you're saying, that he was shot down.
He was not shot from the angle they claim on that roof.
And we just had weeks before that on record one of these demons shooting up the Catholic children's mass in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
So I was like, okay.
I mean, I don't want to believe that this government is as corrupt and crazy as the ones we've had in the past.
You know, the same group that tried to kill Trump and Butler, we know there were two shooters there.
We got an expert on about that.
Right now, I was like, I mean, I certainly didn't see it at the Trump administration.
And then to say Israel, just because he was having a fracus with them, I mean, is Israel capable of that?
Is Net Yahoo?
I think so.
But I just can't say, not only do we not know the truth of what happened, but we know who did it and who's behind it.
That's just not how you investigate.
We're actually trying to be credible here, despite what the corporate media has tried to say about us in the past.
I tell you, though, there's such a loss of faith in the government and the media, period, that no one I know, not just all the military experts and ballistics experts, buys any of this.
And I think it was healthy to question and look at it all.
But I think we now have more questions than answers.
But I think it's clear what Dr. Chris Martinson is saying here from PeakProsperity.com with all his great background in pathology and toxicology from Duke University and Cornell, that the official story is obviously not true, that he was shot from the roof.
So then we have to ask, well, what's going to happen with his trial?
And where's all that going?
And then you have the weird chat GPT basic confession that hits every point if you wanted to convict him.
And we're wanting to write a bulletproof, pun intended conviction letter.
So moving out from your scientist hat and then get back to the science.
I'm going to give you the floor here.
Just if you're sitting there talking to your wife and she's asking, what do you really think happened, honey?
That not only was he not shot from the position we were told he was shot from a different position, I know that there's been an absolute lack of interest in that, apparent lack of interest in that from the official investigating authorities.
We also know that this is sort of just a flavor of what happens, but somebody has been flooding the zone with crackpot ideas.
Now, you opened earlier and you said exactly the right thing.
Listen, we're all free to speculate.
We get some things right.
It's fast moving.
That's all fine.
But what I saw were some really bad ideas that just suddenly got really put forward and got put out there.
And when you chase them down, it's just, it's a little bit dodgy.
It looks more like a professional thing, like somebody with real agency and authority is interested in poisoning the well, right?
So he says, how quickly, if it is broken down, because it doesn't look like he's jumping with a long rifle tucked in his leg, it looks like it's got to be in that backpack.
So how quickly could he break it down if he needed to break it down?
unidentified
A second or two.
What?
Literally just push a button and wrap it around, push another button, wrap it back.
They're designed to be able to be put into full length mode or compact.
If there's another picture of another gun, please let me know.
But this is the picture that was released.
New York Post said that this is a crime scene photo.
It's in an evidence box.
There's no takedown kit on this.
You know, it's got a synthetic stock on there, but there's no button you can press.
There's no easy way to disassemble this.
So how is it that they got this guy on TV?
And who is he anyway?
Well, it turns out he's a Hollywood guy.
He works for movies, TV shows, the firm, the client, ABC, NBC, PBS.
So this guy starts this rumor that this thing is very easily disassembled, takes a second.
And, you know, when I consult my actual experts, like Mr. Guns and Gear and people who know a lot more about weapons than I do, and I know a bit, they say, no, no takedown kit.
It just, it just doesn't exist.
But that's part of the mythology that got out there and it ran with it and really polluted the story because now we have to start questioning, did he take it apart?
When did he reassemble it?
Did he take it apart, put it back on the roof, disassemble it on the roof, then reassemble it to put it in the bushes?
That story is a hot mess.
But I think I see what they're trying to do.
They're trying to claim because they don't have any images of this guy walking up onto the roof with a long gun.
So now you have to account for, well, it had to be in pieces, I guess.
So they want to start this idea that's easily disassembled.
But if you've ever tried to disassemble a Mauser 98 or any other long barrel sporting rifle bolt action, there's about three, four screws, depending on the model, you're going to have to undo.
The whole trigger guard is going to come out as an assembly with the scope and the rifle assembly.
The Magwell is going to have this spring that's going to be popping out, all that.
It takes a quality person 45, 60 seconds to just take it apart.
Putting it back together, a whole nother thing.
But when you do that, you're not zeroed anymore, guaranteed, right?
It just doesn't work out that way.
So when we look at these feet, but they had to account for, you can't see a long gun in this thing.
This guy jumping off the roof, which they said is our suspect.
Oddly, they started that particular video at 12, 23, and 34 seconds, which is after a few seconds after the shot.
So why didn't they show us the video of the guy getting on the roof?
Why don't they show us a video of the time the guy allegedly took the shot and running across the roof?
Nope, they cut it right after the action started.
And they've given us zero videos of this guy walking up the stairwell onto the roof, a couple of grainy potato can stills, and that's where we're at.
So this feels like an intentional attempted sieve at this point in time.
And by the way, we've seen a huge amount of deception going on out there with these.
Hey, listen, we come up with some ideas that don't pan out, but the worst ones that just don't comport with physics, those get a lot of traction somehow.
Somebody's buying views on those and making sure that they go far.
And as soon as I see that, Alex, I'm pretty sure we're dealing with non-it's just not individual.
So we had these, we had all these cameras to work with.
And so I had seven high-quality sources that I used, including Trump's own mic, which is the ultimate source because it was right at the point where you could get what's called the SNCC boom, a gun, a rifle that's shooting a supersonic round, the bullet supersonic.
It's traveling faster than sound.
So the bullet arrives before the report from the gun.
And when it does, it has a little sonic boom, like a plane that's going too fast, faster than Mach 1 will have a sonic boom.
It's lightning.
Boom.
You get the sonic boom.
So we had these beautiful sonograms here that we could begin to line up and learn a lot of things about what happened.
And here we sort of see the snick and then the boom and the snick and the boom.
And so we were able to start unraveling the whole Trump Butler shooting very, very quickly.
The key thing, the reason that I know that we have two shooters is that we had this camera that was on the west side of that AGR building, the American Glass Research Building.
It's over on the side.
If you were facing it from Trump's direction, the left side, the west side.
And there was somebody over there filming and they caught these first three shots here.
You see that this is the shot itself.
These are explosions.
And then this is an echo.
And this is an explosion.
And this little thing is an echo.
So one of the things you can't do if you're a single shooter is change the geometry of the echoes that are going to result.
This camera is sitting in one spot and all of a sudden we see that those next five come offs.
It was one, two, three.
This first shot was the one that nicked Trump's ear.
We had two and three.
These are the ones actually that ended up hurting Copenhaver and David Dutch behind Trump.
And then we have these next string of five, which is like one, two, three, four, five.
And this is the last one, which was the one that killed the kid.
But look at these echoes.
These are 0.17 seconds apart.
These are 0.08, give or take.
Okay.
So I can tell you for a fact that this gun that took these three shots was echoing off of different surfaces than these.
If the FBI was, you know, wanted to run a quality investigation and say, oh, we can explain that.
They would have to run a test, go back there in July when the same leaves are up, make sure there aren't any new structures, put the stand back up, have some equipment.
They should have done these tests honestly the day after.
And then you fire three shots.
And then maybe, I don't know, let's hypothesize.
Maybe the gun barrel was over the ridge line and now it's behind the ridge line and that changes things.
But they would have to recreate this to say, here's how you could get this signature with one lone crazed kid, you know, shooting from a single position.
But beyond that, you can't.
So this, you know, we put this out there and this should have been picked up everywhere.
And I had zero calls from the FBI, zero calls from any investigators.
Nobody was interested.
So that tells you something right there.
At a minimum, they would have to explain how the echoes changed because those are the hardest things to change in a shooting scenario.
Okay.
So, well, with that, I can just guarantee you that what we saw in Butler has not been resolved.
It clearly points to two shooters, and that's what the data we have has.
And we've had this data for, you know, well over a year now and just been sitting on it here.
He was literally an evangelist who'd already had an effect that definitely made Trump win both times, but was accelerating more powerful.
And he was gaining momentum.
And he was an evangelist for the return of the Republic.
That's absolutely why I see the Democrats that clear the deep state and some Republicans that tried to kill Trump and Butler.
I see them as the prime suspect.
Now, they're in Discords.
They use, you know, this guy's a piggyback, or, you know, we know he was connected to this, you know, program at college that was a feeder group to intelligence.
But regardless, to me, and I know you're a scientist, you know, like speculate, but just as an opinion, I think it's the Democrat globalist neocon deep state that has the most motive.
And, but at the same time, I mean, I could see it being any other group, but I think it is really clear that what we're being told is a lie.
And then by extension, who has the power to cover this up and who's doing that?
And I was told two weeks ago by folks that were in the White House meetings, and then I confirmed it with a very well-known journalist who also was told the same thing, who was not in the meeting, but was told by the same people that Trump was like, I want to find out who did it.
Well, and if you have to contrast that with, of course, the overbearingness of the J6, you know, 5,000 FBI agents going out and busting down doors and everything, because that was just so horrible that people walked between velvet ropes.
You can clearly interpret something by the muscularity of the investigation.
It was four days after the shooting that already they were tearing up the grass and repaving the whole crime scene, you know, as if that's what you do in these situations.
Charlie Kirk's murder was the most significant political murder since MLK, as far as I'm concerned.
And it deserves the most intense, rigorous, absolutely, you know, no stone unturned kind of an investigation.
And we're not getting that.
You're right.
Where are these other six furries that should be getting absolutely in cuffs and being talked about?
Well, I do think that Charlie Kirk's murder was not done by Tyler Robinson.
I actually think that his lawyers are going to have a relatively easy time creating what we would call reasonable doubt, right?
You know, if we look at these pictures of him coming up the stairwell, which are these two pictures down here against his booking photos, anything we can see, you can see this guy has a smooth upper ear.
This guy, I can't really tell because it's a potato can, but it looks like a fold across the upper ear that we can see.
I'm not even sure this is him, but we were told it was him.
We were told it was him.
And we were told that, oh, this must be him because he has the same sort of sunglasses, but the hat doesn't match anymore.
And the sunglasses may be a match.
There were cameras everywhere on that, up the stairwell.
And here, these are allegedly the photos taken of somebody who's going up to get on the roof of the Loci building, but I can tell you there's no gun down that pant leg, right?
Yeah, those that don't know, and again, I'm not a registered super marksman, you know, Delta Force person, but I've shot a lot of deer rivals, a lot of Mausers.
And anybody knows you're going hunting, you bump them around too much, you're shooting at 560 yards, it's going to be off, even with the best scopes and things.
You just be put in a soft case, you do all that.
And if you disassemble one for long-range shooting, you can be guaranteed when you put it back together that it's going to be shooting a half foot off if you're lucky.
So absolutely.
He doesn't assemble that on the roof and then shoot him in the throat at 200 yards.
It just, it just, it's, it's, it's, it's horse crap.
And like you said, everybody can focus on camera guns and microphone guns and the guy, the security guard shooting him under the arm, clearly a cell phone.
He goes like that, like everybody does.
Ooh, it's a boom.
But that then makes you ignore the stuff we know is impossible.
The shot at a 10 degree angle, not going through, impossible with that round.
Obviously, yes, you cannot have even a disassemble one in that backpack.
So now we can get rid of phone guns and palm guns and, you know, little camera guns and exploding mics or maybe there was a bullet in the mic, you know, all of that.
And as well, I saw a lot of attempts, a lot of attempts that, again, were they astroturfed or was it flooding the zone trying to convince me that he had been shot from the right.
And everything I have says he was shot from the left.
So classic misdirection.
Of course, there was a lot of effort put up to see if we could get him shot from the right.
Now, what's interesting is on my YouTube channel, I put this video up and it got a strike right away, the first one I put up.
And I have somebody behind the scenes who's able to sort of resolve those.
But I was getting strike after strike on there and they were burning up all of their, they have some credits that they're able to sort of deal with the situation, but that was happening.
And then, of course, they wanted us to believe nonsense, which is violating the laws of physics, which I can't do.
I just, I default to the laws of physics.
Physics is unbeaten, you know, when you get right down to it.
So if you were standing on the corner of that building seven at the exact moment it started to let go and you dropped a bowling ball into the air, you would have tracked that bowling ball for two and a quarter seconds at the same speed.
That's what we're talking about here.
So in order for that to happen, somehow 80,000 tons of structural steel has to have zero resistance.
The main FBI headquarters for records, not in D.C., was there.
And the CIA headquarters, the second largest CIA base in the U.S. And the word was, because the Pentagon missing money, they put it all together to get rid of the records as well.
The best Iris C monster, the best Shilohy, the best spike protein, pro-cardiovascular system, ultimate life force, and the widest selection of Patriot Apparel.
And it funds the second American Revolution worldwide.
You know, I've covered Building 7 so much that it just becomes second nature to me But now that it's so hot and so big, and thank God Tucker's put it out there, made it central.
And even the young turfs are like, gosh, Building 7 looks like they did blow it up.
They're just talking about the free fall and the physics, which, of course, to scientists is the total proof because it is.
We have the emergency deputy head of emergency management saying they told him that they blew it up.
We had him on the news saying they blew it up.
We have the police saying get back.
And the media spun it.
Jones says the police blew it up.
No, the police are told they're blowing it up.
Get back.
And we actually went to New York.
These people contacted us.
I interviewed the firemen and all of them.
And, you know, the dust was so deadly.
About the last few years, I'm like, hey, get that fireman back on.
Get that police officer.
And you know what happens?
The one Leanne McAdoo interview, the ones interviewed, they're all dead.
Something like 20,000 of the people in and around the building have died down, cancers and stuff.
So we got to dig up all those interviews and repost them because like the like the Leanne McAdoo interview with the black fire captain that was there from the start and for like weeks, he died from the dust.
And he's just explaining it all, how they said they blew it up and how they did it all.
I mean, and people go, oh, you're saying that.
No, they didn't blow it up.
They told us they blew it up.
They were the people telling us.
Sorry, I'm ranting.
Dr. Chris Martinson, and some stations don't carry this first five.
I want to keep you about 10, 15 minutes after this break in about three or four minutes, but just putting bookends on building seven as somebody that does pathology and toxicology, and just studies basic science.
And we've had so many engineers on about this as well.
It just boggles the mind that they think we're so stupid.
But I guess the good news is people don't buy it anymore.
So now they just flood the zone with garbage to try to confuse everybody.
And there was so much physical evidence on 9-11 that just didn't match physics, right?
They had these concrete artifacts that they found.
I saw in the NYPD 9-11 Memorial Museum.
They had a concrete artifact from Building Six.
Six?
Not seven, not one, not two, six, next to one.
And it came from the basement and it was fused concrete.
And it was interesting because I had a gun barrel pointing out because the ATF was housed in Building Six.
So now we have to just material science physically account for heat sufficient to melt concrete and fuse it to steel.
And that's about 3,400 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 30 minutes.
You need an oven to do that.
So how do we account for that, right?
And of course, they can't because the physical evidence doesn't match.
You can't have a basement fire.
There's no combination of desks and paper that's going to like give you that in a poorly oxygenated basement environment or even a perfectly oxygenated above-ground environment won't happen.
So we have all these physical artifacts that just don't line up.
And they asked us to believe in those.
And the one that really caught me, I don't know if you remember this, but like it's like six years after 9-11.
And they said they found some bone chips, human bone chips on a building pretty far away.
I want to just come back for a few minutes and just give you the floor.
Seriously.
So if you pause, I'll be here and jump in because I'm Switterson and all this.
I kind of perciverate.
But doctor, I'd like you to other points, what you think should be done.
Obviously, we need the autopsy.
They say there is one.
Where is it?
We need to see the bullet fragments of the bullet.
And then what else?
Think about this.
What else should the public be doing that's productive?
Because Charlie's a great guy, a good friend of mine.
He would want the truth to come out.
And people see the professionalism of TPUSA and his wife and say that's fake.
No, she was professional.
That's what she did.
You put on a good face in that stuff.
But at the same time, I want to see them searching for truth as well because the issues don't add up.
If they try to block investigations at TPUSA, then I'm going to start getting very suspicious.
Not yet, but I will be.
You know, I'm accused of sensationalism and making stuff up.
But if you go back over my 30-plus-year history, and I've made a few mistakes here and there, I've always just wanted to have the truth.
That's how I want to be treated.
I don't even think about how do I twist something.
To me, it's like a scientific method that you can apply to anything in life.
How does this really work?
That's what just feels natural.
It's not even natural.
You just do it.
It's second nature.
But I have been absolutely, and I'm not defending myself.
This is an issue of people's brains.
I've been viciously attacked by every group that has their own pet theory about this.
And then we blow up the video and it's not a camera gun.
It's a bottle of water.
It's not him shooting him under the arm, the security guy.
It's his cell phone.
He jerks back.
And then I'm a traitor.
You're covering up.
And not only are those theories that have now been disproven, disproven, but then people just move on without any evidence of those particular theories being true.
Then you add Israel to it.
Listen, if Israel does something wrong, like the October 7th standdown or any of this stuff, I'm on it like white on rice.
But we're not going to actually get to the truth and start setting a precedent where the deep state won't pull this anymore if we let them flood the zone with disinformation, fog of war, and can't get there.
So the bad guys for this broadcast and people like our guests, because we have credibility with smart people.
Like, I want to be tomorrow's news today.
I want to be the guy that people know, oh, he'll actually, you know, do the research.
Because let me tell you, I don't do what my listeners want, but I do listen and I do cover things that interest them because if you don't do that, you won't have an audience to begin with.
But then I'll give my truthful perspective on it.
So I'm just as obsessed on this Charlie thing as you are, and we should stay on it.
But also at a certain point, if we just look at a thousand different theories and everyone we've got to accept with no evidence, that becomes a distraction from the truth and then a distraction from everything else.
So Dr. Chris Martinson of peakprosperity.com in the next 10 minutes, I'm going to give the floor right now.
What do you think we should do?
What should we demand?
Where is this going?
You heard my comment about TPUSA.
They want to say, oh, because his wife was so professional in these speeches.
Well, that's what she did.
That's what, I mean, that's what you do.
I mean, I can tell you, if somebody killed my family member and this was happening, I would get up there and give a strong speech and probably wouldn't cry because that's something I generally do privately, but I might.
But the point is, people say, oh, and I'm not attacking Nick Fuentez.
I think he has reasonable, you know, he says what he thinks, but he's like, well, it looks like an arranged marriage to me.
Well, Charlie's talked about the story forever.
And that's how this works.
You get this beautiful woman with this huge resume comes in, wants to work there.
And he said, point blank, I want to date you.
I'm not giving you a job here.
Sorry.
And that's, and that, I mean, look, she's very pretty, very smart.
And this is like wife material.
And I know a lot of guys that have businesses and things, and a beautiful woman comes in and they want a job and they just say, nope, I'm not giving you the job.
It's nothing to do with that.
You're too beautiful.
You know, I'm smitten by you and I'd like to take you out, blah, blah, blah.
Conservatives, populists, and people don't really have a good place other than church to go out on dates.
And then you don't even know people's politics.
One reason TP USA is so popular for the last 10, 11 years and growing is it's actually a big singles meetup, dummies.
For people that don't know, all the incels and people, I'm not saying Nick's that.
I'm saying that they're scared of women.
No, these are women that share your values and they're looking for, they're looking for a man.
So, so to say, oh, you know, and I disagree with Nick on this, you know, oh, it's an arranged marriage with no evidence.
No, that's how men and women work.
This is wifey material because she's professional.
She's been an actress.
She's done all this.
She's been in human services and helping orphans around the world.
She's done this.
She's a Christian.
And they hit it off.
That's how it works.
Everybody knows most marriages, it's a crazy thing, are people that you met in business or in life or at work because there's just a different, it's a different vibe.
And I know I'm ranting.
Said I'd go to Dr. Chris Martinson, but I just also wanted to, you know, just say, and I get it, Nick's a virgin, and I'm not criticizing for that.
He's a Catholic Christian.
I'm actually proud of him doing that.
For those of us that have, let's just say, growing up, we're not very chaste.
I mean, I guess people could think, well, this woman's beautiful.
She's incredible.
She's smart.
She's amazing.
You know, this must be arranged.
No, when you're out, when men see a woman and you know this is the one, then it's bang.
I mean, it's like hitting a gong.
So I absolutely believe his story.
He's told hundreds of times of how he met her, fell in love with her, married her, had children with her.
And I totally appreciate that rant because when I met my current wife, it was instant gong.
I know exactly that sensation, that feeling.
So I'm going to put out a plea.
Obviously, we want all the TPUSA footage that they've got from the cameras that were right there, the microphones.
But we also need some things from, I haven't found a single one of these yet.
So let's imagine we're sitting in Charlie's seat and straightforward.
You got he's shot from the left.
That means we need people who are filming from the right who may have caught some roof lines or anything like that.
I haven't seen a single one of those yet.
And here's the theory.
So we know that a bullet landed in his body.
If we believe that cavitation event, we believe that he was instantly dead.
He had that decorticate posturing that speaks of a violent insult.
We saw that this is graphic, but when he did bleed, you know, if he's shot and it takes a couple of frames, but then you see all this blood, but you see, if you watch it carefully, it spills out.
It doesn't spurt out.
So if his heart was still pumping and his carotid artery was hit, that stuff's going two, three feet.
It doesn't.
I think it takes a beat because what happens is he has this huge insult.
It explodes.
It pushes that blood back up into his head and then it drains out, but it's not spurting out.
So that looks like a venous dump.
So, okay, so we've established he's shot.
So now we have to account for what are some physical geometries?
Where could he have been shot from that would match what we need to see?
I think the minimum angle would be about 20 degrees.
So I've drawn a 20-degree line on here with my magic protractor.
This comes down into his body.
Why 20 degrees?
Because it lands below on this angle, below that thoracic vertebrae.
If it's above that, his arms aren't moving anymore.
Okay.
So it has to be at least at this steep of an angle on a downslope.
That puts it clearly down into his chest cavity.
When you were talking, Alex, about how the doctor had allegedly said that it bounced down and crushed these here.
That's the minimum angle that would get us here: 20 degrees.
Plus, we have to be off axis a bit.
40, 45 degrees gets us to a point where we're actually hitting the spine and not just coming out to the side of the spine.
So it has to be both a steeper side angle, a steeper down angle.
So this sort of comports if he's shot from this other building.
This is where they said the shooter was way up here, straight coming down this way.
If we put somebody over here, okay.
Now, was anybody there?
I don't have any video evidence of that.
So we would love to see anybody sitting to Charlie's right who may have been filming up this way, particularly anybody over here filming this direction.
That would be highly valuable.
But we have this, a couple of stills from a video that was shot from right here.
Somebody was at this position to Charlie's left.
And when the shot rang out, they swung their camera around a little bit and they came over here.
And I want to draw your attention to cowboy hat guy in red shirt guy.
Where they are pointing, they are pointing exactly at this position right here when you triangulate.
This red arrow shows you the direction he's pointing.
He didn't point here.
He's pointing here for some reason.
Everybody else is screaming and running around and ducking, but this guy just stands up hand in pocket and goes, you know, like people will.
Again, complex audio environment.
Maybe we heard echoing sounds.
Maybe he misheard it.
You know, what witnesses can be unreliable.
But both red shirt guy and cowboy hat guy seem pretty composed and they're looking right at this building.
So if it was me, I'd be looking somewhere over here onto Charlie's left because I've put red shirt guy in here pointing almost exactly as I could, best I could, you know, landing it on there.
It's hard because the angles are all kind of weird, but that's where he's pointing.
He's pointing over on this building called the Sorensen roof, not the Lossie building, which would have been, again, straight up back here, back this way.
So I think we just, you know, to speculate a little bit, we have some evidence that he's shot from his left and above, not from straight on front, relatively speaking.
And so the call is very clear.
We need every possible recording at this point in time.
Particular, what I need is I need people's original recordings of the shot going off with what they call the metadata.
You would go into your video, you'd look at properties because we need to know the exact second that that shot was taken because then we can start to line up and have an actual proper crime scene timeline.
I'm a little surprised at how few recordings we have to work with at this point.
There's only five that have made it out there that are of any quality.
There were cameras everywhere.
I have one picture.
I see 30 phones up doing something.
Maybe they were taking still pictures, but I'll bet a lot of them were recording.
Where are those?
I went on TikTok.
Actually, my coworker Nick did because he has a very secure machine that's isolated from the rest of his machines because TikTok's a very grabby company.
At any rate, he went in there and it was just, Alex, it was all junk.
It was people doing downloads of downloads and edits on top of edits, finding the original source files, very difficult.
So if we could get those, now we can begin to do some proper forensics.
I didn't intend to go down this path.
I put a lot into the Butler thing.
I have a lot of other things I need to analyze for my Peak Prosperity tribe, but too much added up was wrong.
And when I see things that are obviously physically inconsistent with reality, that's where I got to kind of dive in.
So I'm all in now.
And if I could get any of those recordings, particularly from people on the far side looking up towards where this video was shot from, that would be really helpful.
Any audio recordings, any video recordings, but the originals, if we could get those, we'll set up.
We have a Dropbox link and I've got ProtonMail.
If people want to get them to us, please do.
You can find us at peakprosperity.com.
I'm on Twitter at Chris Martinson.
I use my real name, no pseudonyms here.
So anything we can do to get some more source material would be helpful.
But the biggest, best source material is going to be what TPUSA has and is not releasing at this point in time alongside, obviously, the autopsy report.
So that's the plea.
All right.
So this and Cowboy Hat Guy, these are the two people here.
If we could find these people, this would be very helpful as well.
We should talk to these folks.
But anybody who's there who has an eyewitness point of view, if you think you heard it, something seems a little bit off, we would want to know a lot about what you have.
And best guess, this area and back, it should be scoured very carefully for clues.
I'm a little worried so much time has passed.
We're a couple of weeks past this at this point.
So I don't know what we're going to find anymore.
But that's where I would have started if I was in the business of doing this right there.
We should be looking.
That's where Red Hat, Cowboy Hat guy, and Redshirt Guy are pointing.
And anybody who's got any videos about that, that would be fantastic because as we saw.
Just go into your phone, look under properties for that particular photo or video, and just the exact, we need to know exactly when that was taken.
Because if it starts at 12, you know, 20 and we know that at 1223 in X number of seconds, the shot rang out, that's going to be contained.
We'll be able to figure that out from the metadata very, very quickly.
So that's what we need.
And so our conclusions here are pretty simple.
There's not a chance in the world that anybody's going to convince me at this point.
Very high confidence.
Never say never, but pretty high confidence that a 30 odd six round hitting the softest part of the throat at an angle where it couldn't have intersected a bone didn't just blow straight through.
It didn't suddenly turn corner and go somewhere else.
If such things could happen, Alex, we would see videos of people shooting watermelons with 30 odd sixes and the bullet would mysteriously come out the side.
Yeah, I mean, I've shot, I've already told the story 100 times, but I mean, it goes straight through, even if it hits ribs on both sides.
And it blows a four-inch hole in the other side.
And Again, I've only taken a shot at a hog.
I shot one with a 30-odd six straight on, a few from the side.
I shot like a 400-pound hog with a 30-odd six, and I shot at its head, but it went under, hit the neck, and the thing went in two plus feet, bounced off ribs, bounced back up, and blew up into the shoulder, but didn't come out.
We gutted it and could see how it just annihilated everything and broke up.
But then it already lost power through two feet, then bounce back another foot up into the, or two feet in the shoulder, foot and a half in the shoulder.
For people that just, it's insane.
This is not what they do.
You see, Kennedy shot with a 30-odd six in the head.
It goes in, blows the whole back of the head off.
That's what it does.
And that wasn't from the bullet breaking up.
That was, like you said, it's that pressure wave it creates.
And it has a lot less energy, less than half what a 30-06 would have.
And these are really powerful energies we're talking about here.
This isn't just, this is physics, right?
This is just like what we're talking about with Building 7.
It's just physics.
And the one thing I'm not going to do for my government or for a narrative control police state is to suspend the laws of physics whenever it's convenient for them.
They are what they are.
And if we can't have shared common ground of understanding where you and I can have a conversation and understand that gravity is always, you know, 9.86 meters per second squared or whatever the constant is, like we have to have this shared understanding.
There's not a chance in the world that a 30-odd six round hits a softest part of the human body, which is the throat, in a place where it couldn't have hit any bones and doesn't just go completely, not just through that one.
Night and day compared to Democrats, but clearly the same FBI is still in place, the same ATF, the same Secret Service that covered up Butler.
Trump sent investigators, Hagman and others, you know, through Poseobic.
They got threatened all of it.
We know there was another shooter.
You've already covered all that back further when Crooks failed.
And they'd be washing off the thing.
And oh, we couldn't have Secret Service up there.
The slope's too high.
There was a Secret Service shot.
It was the cop.
It was all lies.
And so there was clearly a stand down.
They covered up the supposed Patsy's house and all wiped down, no utensils, all of it, clearly a cutout.
But what this says, when we ask who's behind it, well, it's the government, not just ham physically doing investigation, but putting out a bunch of stuff that's clearly looks planted and staged and not true from minute one.
So then you've got to bring the motive into the deep state within the U.S. government.
And so how does that, I don't like to speculate, Doctor, but now we have to at this point because we know there's a cover-up.
Then why would the Trump administration, I know Trump's not in charge of that, be involved in that?
And, you know, we've all, all of us have had concerns over, you know, Cash and Dan pre-getting into those roles, very different, obviously, from Cash and Dan after getting into those roles.
One of the other things I investigated, of course, when they came out and said, oh, we have this video evidence that proves that Epstein couldn't have been killed by anybody.
And then they show us this like little corner of a stairwell with a missing minute.
And it was just so laughable.
And you have to ask yourself, well, what happens when you go to DC?
I mean, do you have it?
Like, what happened?
Do they show you something really horrible or really good?
What is it?
I don't know, but they show you something that clearly, you know, they say Epstein killed himself.
And of course, we all know that there seems to be zero interest in the Trump administration following up on anything related to Epstein.
So, of course, you know, we've got another clue there, but there's obviously a deep state.
It's operating.
It does things.
And it asks us to believe the impossible all the time.
And here's another one.
We're supposed to believe that somebody used a 30-06 from 140 yards at a 10-degree angle, and somehow it magically went, took a 30-degree angle down into somebody's body.
Harrison Smith was about to the war room here in 27 minutes at Infowars.com forward slash show, banda video, everywhere else, and all of the stations across the country.
And I run in there and they were already covering it.
They already had the video going.
So, by the way, the federal judge just about 20 months ago green lit the shutdown of Infowars.
And they've got the receivership of the state.
And tomorrow, the next day, the sheriff's department's coming here to close us.
So, thanks for standing with us over the years.
Thanks for everything everybody did.
Thanks for your prayers.
We survived so much, people didn't take it serious.
But I guess when this shuts down, you will.
I've never cried wolf.
All the schizophrenics online said it wasn't real, any of this stuff.
You know, this is sick.
And our lawyers showed all the proof where they said, we don't want money.
We want him silenced and how they violated due process and our rights.
And we're going to go forward and litigate against these people.
We're not going to stop with the Alex Shows Network, but that's where we are.
But in closing, with our guest here, we're three weeks in and we're simply showing the facts of 30 odd six at the angle they said from where the supposed shooter was is impossible.
Absolutely an insult to logic and science.
And then you got the Trump administration sitting at the center of it.
And I had a White House source almost two weeks ago say, I really hate to tell you this, but we're in the meeting.
You know, Trump wants it all investigated and all the accomplices arrested.
You saw him say that.
But they said in the breakaway meetings, they're like, nope, that's shut down.
And that's going to come out soon as well.
So I wish this wasn't the case.
I think the very same groups that tried to kill Trump and failed in Butler did this, like Dr. Chris Martinson said, they got better.
And this is all a major test.
Doctor, any closing comments and anything else you'd like to say or motive or where we should, you already said where we should go from here.
I totally agree on demanding all these answers, but I don't know how we do that.
Well, Alex, I'm just reeling from the information you just shared because as we've seen, anybody who's a truth teller has you're under constant assault in this.
So I was a COVID truth teller and I caught on and I did a lot of COVID reporting.
And I'm just, again, this is who I am.
I just share data.
When the data changes, I change.
It's very simple.
People say, oh, you're a conspiracy theorist.
No, I'm just, I just follow facts and logic.
And sometimes that feels like conspiracy theory in this day and age, but it's very simple.
And I can reproduce everything.
And I can tell you where I got my sources.
I love that interview you did with Tucker where he asked you, how did you know?
You said, well, I just read what they told me, you know, and I'm with you on that.
If somebody says they're going to do something and then it happens, well, maybe they did it.
15 years ago, the Rockefeller Foundation CIA say, we're going to release a virus, disease X, six feet apart for fear, mask, bring in a world ID, inject everybody.
And we had Fauci say that, you know, in 2017, well, Trump's going to have to face a pandemic.
And how did he know, right?
Again, so maybe we should ask a few questions.
But they did this event 201 planning.
They brought in all these people to talk about how you'd handle a coronavirus, of all things, which we'd never had a pandemic outbreak of a coronavirus.
So they talk about it, but they're not bringing in anybody who's saying, how would we limit human deaths?
They're like, how do we control the story?
How do we get people to believe us when we have like this rush through vaccine?
How do we lock up dissenters, right?
You know, how do we control the information space?
Not one thing in that entire meeting was about how do we help people get through this with the least disruption, least death.
That's not how they're organized, right?
So I face strike after strike on YouTube, barely survived that, you know, just because I was talking about things like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine.
I'm working with frontline doctors.
And, you know, I work on a board with some of these doctors who were there at the beginning of all this because they had data for me, Alex.
They had data.
They said, look, we're not losing patients, right?
They're having an upper respiratory problem.
So let's give them some, you know, corticosteroids and maybe methylpredencilone and a little bit of supportive care.
And look, they're good.
And the whole world was like, oh, well, you know, we should just come back when you're blue in the lips and you can't breathe anymore.
And then we'll put you on a ventilator with some remdesivir.
If I get worked up and I get on my soapboxes, because I fought that battle for two years straight, three years straight, just doing constant COVID reporting.
And what I saw shocked me to my core because I discovered it's not just that they were a little careless and doctors just sort of like put people on ventilators and remdesivir and killed it.
I don't know that because, you know, they had manufacturing process one and two.
One was sort of boutique, handmade, and that's what they used in the clinical trials.
Process two is this big, scaled up, messy, never-before-tested, you know, manufacturing process that unfortunately left a lot of what's called plasmid DNA along with the mRNA.
And that DNA is a contaminant, and that contaminant got put into people in little vesicles called the LNPs, those lipid nanoparticles that then take that DNA and directly put it into your cell.
And that right there is with the SV40 that they had in there.
It's a guaranteed way to create cancer.
Absolutely.
It's going to statistically, that's going to happen.
And I'm still mystified that we can't get those shots pulled off the market just on the basis of contamination alone.
And as much as I want to support Trump, yesterday they put up Trump with Albert Borla at a worship fest, and the crew goes, it's Albert Borla because I was stunned.
Of course, I know Albert Borla, and they don't pop my ear a lot when I'm kind of during the headlines.
Sometimes I get a name wrong.
They'll correct me a couple times a day.
They'll say, hey, it's this boss.
But they're like, it's Albert Borla.
It's Albert Borla.
No, I was just watching them have this love fest and I was being punched in the stomach.
So I was just dear in the headlights.
And it wasn't like a fake thing of me shocked on air.
I was like, oh, you know, Kennedy was behind him, giving him dirty looks, but oh, we're going to cut your drug prices now, aren't we?
Which is like, what kind of people are we dealing with here?
Because that's what, when I say the deep state, what I'm talking about is there's a crew of people who feel like they are entitled, if not obligated, to mess around with our lives.
And if that means they have to decide if we live or die, that's how it is.
So those people have a name.
I think G. Edward Griffin got it right a long time ago.
I feel bad I didn't listen to him like 20 years ago because I thought, oh, he keeps talking about collectivists, you know.
But this is who they are.
And I think that's what we're up against.
And I think that's in large measure what the deep state is: people who think they want to have the right to impose a digital ID, tell you how far you can go, 15-minute cities, can't eat meat.
If you don't stop eating meat, we'll give you a meat disease, right?
I mean, literally, I could just, the company I work for can just have a company house.
I just live there.
I mean, I'm not even worried about that.
It's just that the mass exercise of naked organized corruption by people raising $300 million, shown the documents off my name, while they claim I made money off them, barely ever even talked about these people.
To watch the Democratic Party wear the dead skin of kids from Sandy Hook and then wear my skin and say I'm this villain that's done these things.
It's all a premeditated psyop and there's $74 million against Remington, bankrupting Remington and being used as a weapon.
The straw man they built against the First Amendment and the second.
This is a spiritual battle.
But the judge did rule that the stays lifted.
So last time they had their fake auction, they were here the next morning.
They had a fake auction November 13th.
They were here the next day, told me, get out.
I wouldn't.
So they killed the internet.
I went to the backup studio that I don't own, funded by Big Lee and the AlexShowstore.com.
And again, I don't own that.
They're going to run right into brick walls on that.
And we have all these other sponsors.
But that's why you need to go to thealxonstore.com and support right now because I don't want to just continue on with the shows we're doing now.
I want to go at least 20 hours a day, 19 hours.
I want to go like live 5 a.m. to midnight every day because we need to be covering breaking news.
We need to be putting the clips out.
We need to be engaged in this fight.
They want us off the air because we're so effective.
That's why they panic.
But I told you, come on, be the first to be indicted six months ago.
All I need you to do is realize this is a real fight.
I'm fighting for you.
So I'm fighting for myself.
We all have collective freedoms.
I fight for myself, but I'm fighting for you.
And the minute you understand this is a war is the minute we really start winning.
We have a tiny percentage of people that are engaged and committed and get this.
If I could just get a few more percentage points of you to really engage by praying and spreading the word and financially supporting, whoever you support, you change the world.
But I'm lucky they didn't just kill me.
You know that that was debated.
No, don't turn into martyr.
Shut him down, steal his identity, create a thing that's not him, a straw man, and use him as a fundraiser.
I was blessed in their delusion that doesn't work, but it backfired.
Their official story, their lies, everything they've done has only made us bigger.
And that's why they're so scared right now.
And that's why now I'm in maximum physical danger from the deep state.
But as long as I'm on the field, I'm going to give you 110% output.
All I need is your backing, your prayer.
Please pray for InfoWars.
Please pray for a miracle.
And whatever you do, support the Alex Shows Network at AJM Live on X. They already try to take the real Alex Shows on X. Elon Musk blocked that, but they're going to be back.
But those under the most attack are the ones you've got to bet on because those are the most effective people against tyranny.
It's so simple.
But you fundamentally have to have that sink in that whoever's under top globalist attack is who we need to back because they're over the target.
You get the flat.
Here's a short promo.
I'm going to come back with some closing comments and I'll be on the war room with Harrison Smith.
These shows aren't some genre and ooh, they're entertaining.
And wow, this guy's intense.
Why do you think I'm intense?
I'm under total attack.
I've been hunted for decades by these people.
They've attacked my whole family.
Our family's ever been stronger because we're not wimps and we understand we're doing God's work.
But I'm in a war and you better realize you are too.
Do you understand that?
My God, they've killed over 30 million people with the poison shots.
They flood us with fentanyl.
They're absolutely in every major public and most private schools with grants, secretly brainwashing your sons and daughters that think they're another sex and make them totally mentally ill and then be mutilated chemically or surgically.
It is a devil cult.
It's the same program worldwide.
It's BlackRock.
It's the New World Order.
It's the transhumanist on record.
They say the future is not human.
unidentified
They're building this nightmare world and we're simply saying no.
So then all of you that are actually listening have to remember: oh, go to Rumble, the Alex Shones channel, go to Roloff Shones on X at AJN Live.
We'll be doing the shows there, satellite uplinks, same radio stations, everything.
We're not going to give up.
And they're going to continue to come after us then.
That's why you've got to back us.
But they are so discredited with their fake auction and sending in private security with no court order to try to block us down last May 31st.
We've drug this out for over a year and it's exposed them in the court of public opinion.
I go on all these big shows and they go, congratulations, beating them.
I'm like, I haven't.
Well, they all, Bloomberg and the Onion, they got defeated.
I'm like, they're not stopping.
So they think shutting this down will somehow change the narrative.
No, we have our abusive process, conspiracy against rights, civil issues, all of it.
It's a whole new ballgame.
And as long as you support us and our sponsors, I won't be the owner anymore.
I'll work for a new company, new system that's already been set up.
I'll be on air and your support then will go to the legal offense and what we're going to do because they have just continued what they've done before out of their desperation.
And that's the reality of where we are.
As long as we don't decide we're defeated, as long as we don't give up, because this isn't a four-quarter football game.
This is an endless game.
That's the fight between good versus evil.
We win.
But the variable is you.
Don't thank me for what I've done.
I didn't do this.
We did this.
The crew, the guests, the host, the journalist, you, the listeners, the viewers that spread the word and called in and did the things you didn't supported us.
People tend to think being persecuted is, oh, you want to stay away from that?
Oh, so you want to stay away from the fight?
No, it's like John Paul Jones said when he got commissioned as the head of the U.S. Navy probably was starting and he was writing to the Continental Congress.
He said, I only want the fastest ships.
I only want to be sent into the main war zones in direct action.