The main topic being discussed in this passage is a conspiracy theory involving Russian spies,
Donald J. Trump, and Hillary Clinton. The speaker believes that there are criminal multinational
elements who have hijacked their republic and praises Trump's efforts to restore it. They criticize
Clinton for her connections with foreign powers. At the end of the passage, they promote Alexa Pure
Pro water filtration system which can remove impurities from fresh sources of water.
Don't look at me, Winston, and see the black circles around my eyes and see how ugly and weak I am expressing myself and dying that I torture people 18 hours a day and I have a horrible life.
That's the beauty of the satanic evil, of the priest of power ripping apart humanity.
We were going live about 10 minutes ago and everything went dark here in the studio.
This is Rob Dew, reporting for InfoWars.com.
My co-ord here, Owen Schroyer, the cuck slayer, is joining me.
And we're going to go live right now to Paul Ryan's holding a press conference for his disgraceful, basically Obamacare light bill that he was trying to push through.
There's a lot of things going on here and we'll talk about them My first thing is let's get the government out of healthcare.
And I don't think that is going to happen at this point.
But guys, pull up the press conference behind me and let's just go live to it.
So Paul Ryan is coming out.
They postponed the vote.
They did not have the vote.
They didn't have the votes to get it.
So they just said, I guess they're pushing for the weekend.
You know, the way I see it at this point is Obamacare is a total hostage bill, and Trump and the Republicans are saying, look, either take the new health care bill or we'll keep Obamacare and let it totally collapse.
Everything he possibly could to help people see the opportunity that we have with this bill.
He's really been fantastic.
Still, we've got to do better, and we will.
I absolutely believe that.
This is a setback no two ways about it.
But it is not the end of the story, because I know that every man and woman in this conference is now motivated more than ever to step up our game, to deliver on our promises.
I know that everyone is committed to seizing this incredible opportunity that we have, and I sure am.
You're talking about real people.
Now you've got a law in the book that you guys don't like, the White House doesn't like, but it's going to be the law for the foreseeable future.
Do you plan to try to help it along and prop it up, or do you plan to just let it weather?
The question is, do we kind of prop it along and try and prop it up?
It is so fundamentally flawed, I don't know that that is possible.
What we're really worried about is, and you've heard me say this all along, is the coming premium increases that are coming with a death-spiraling healthcare system.
That is my big concern.
We just didn't quite get consensus today.
What we have is a member-driven process to try and get consensus.
We came very close, but we did not get that consensus.
That's why I thought the wise thing to do is not proceed with a vote, but to pull the bill and see what we can do.
But I don't think the law, as it is fashioned or anything close to it, is really going to be able to survive.
We'll see.
We're going to go back and figure out what the next steps are.
Can you explain if it is the conservatives of the Freedom Caucus who effectively drove out your predecessor, John Boehner?
Are they responsible for the defeat here today?
Well, I don't want to cast blame.
There is a block of no votes that we had that is why this didn't pass.
There were a sufficient number of votes.
That prevented it from passing, and they didn't change their votes.
We were close.
Some of the members of that caucus were voting with us, but not enough were.
And I met with their chairman earlier today, and he made it clear to me that the votes weren't going to be there from their team, and that was sufficient to provide the balance to not have this bill passed.
Mr. Speaker, you all swept the House, won the majority with the promise to repeal Obamacare.
The majority of the Senate with the promise to repeal Obamacare.
The White House with the promise to repeal Obamacare.
How do you go home to your constituents and send all of your members home to their constituents, saying, You know what?
It's not even 100 days into the administration.
Sorry, folks.
We just can't figure it out.
Dana, it's a really good question.
I wish I had a better answer for you.
I really believe that Obamacare is a law that is collapsing, it's hurting families, it's not working.
I'm telling you, the dynamics of this hearing today were unbelievable.
And it's going to get worse.
And so I don't think the architects of Obamacare, I'm sure they may be pleased right now, but when they see how bad this thing gets, based on all the projections we're being told by the plans that are participating in Obamacare, I don't think they're going to like that either.
Look, five states, you got one plan left, one choice.
Over a third of the counties in America, one plan left.
And the kinds of projections we're being told from the people providing health insurance to these people and plans, it's going to get even worse.
And so I don't think the architects of Obamacare envision this future.
It's certainly not one we want for the American people.
And I wish we had the kind of consensus we needed to bring a bill to the floor to pass and replace it.
But we just don't have that right now.
Thank you.
What about the political capital that was burning?
You have to keep the government open in about five weeks, the debt ceiling.
You still want to do tax reform.
How much capital did you earn on this today and how does that potentially injure those other bills?
I think our members know we did everything we could to get consensus.
This is how governing works when you're in the majority.
We need to get 216 people to agree with each other To write legislation.
Not 210, not 215. We need 216 people in the House to agree with each other on how to write a piece of legislation.
We didn't have 216 people.
We were close, but we did not have 216 people.
And that's how legislating works.
And so now we're going to move on with the rest of our agenda because we have big ambitious plans to improve people's lives in this country.
We want to secure the border.
We want to rebuild our military.
We want to get the deficit under control.
We want infrastructure and we want tax reform.
The last question you asked me about tax reform, Chad.
I spoke with the President, the Treasury Secretary, and his economic advisors earlier today about tax reform.
So we are going to proceed with tax reform.
This makes it clearly more difficult.
You know how the numbers work.
It's about a trillion dollars.
But that just means the Obamacare taxes stay with Obamacare.
We're going to go fix the rest of the tax code.
I don't think so.
I don't think this is prologue for other future things because members realize there are other parts of our agenda that people have even more agreement on what to achieve.
We have even more agreement on the need and the nature of tax reform on funding the government, on rebuilding the military, on securing the border.
This issue had a big difference of opinion, not whether we should repeal and replace Obamacare, but just how we should replace it.
And that is the growing pains of governing.
We were a 10-year opposition party where being against things was easy to do.
You just had to be against it.
And now, in three months' time, we try to go to a governing party where we actually have to get 216 people to agree with each other on how we do things.
And we weren't just quite there today.
We will get there, but we weren't there today.
I was wondering if you're going to move ahead with HHS phase 2 and here with phase 3 legislation and also if you can just talk about how the conference is feeling right now.
The conference is let down.
The conference is disappointed.
The conference, we were on the cusp of fulfilling a promise that we made.
We were on the cusp of achieving an ambition that we've all had for seven years and we came a little short.
We were close, but not quite there.
On your other issues, This bill would have made what we call phase two much, much better.
Nevertheless, I think there are some things that the Secretary of HHS can do to try and sort of stabilize things, but really we needed this bill to make it better.
For instance, risk pools.
We believe the smarter way to help people with preexisting conditions get affordable coverage While bringing down the healthcare costs for everybody else is through reinsurance risk or risk sharing pools which this bill supplied for the states.
That's not now going to happen and therefore he won't be able to deploy that policy tool that we think is better than Obamacare.
So we do lose a lot of the tools we wanted to help improve people's lives and bring down healthcare costs in this country.
You never not take a call from Alex Johns, even when you're on the air.
But getting back to these, when we went and had my daughter, actually the last two kids we had, we were on health sharing plans.
I think one cost us about $450 and the other cost us about $600.
We paid for all the costs up front and then we were reimbursed.
So when you look at the reimbursements.
So I would encourage people to do that instead of fluttering around going, well, I have to pay $1,300 to $1,600 a month to cover my family and then they're not going to cover any costs until we hit $6,000.
I'm seriously infuriated by the lack of logic and common sense of these Democrats.
And then the ultimate irony is I'm glad they didn't want to pass the bill.
I would have voted no with them.
So how do you like that?
That's what I was saying the whole time.
If the Democrats were smart, they would have voted to pass this bill because Ryan would have loved it.
It would have been a win for Ryan.
At this point, I feel like Trump is just kind of like just waving his hands at the issue, injecting a comment every once in a while like this, that, or the other.
And he really just kind of seemed to be handoff at this point like, Okay, Obamacare is going to collapse on its own, or maybe we can get this better healthcare in.
And like you said, kind of just put the onus on Ryan, who had to delay the vote yesterday and then cancel the vote today because he can't get the yes votes.
If the Democrats were smart, they would have voted to pass this bill, and they could have kept government's hands in our healthcare.
But because the Democrat Party is so obsessed with identity politics, they voted no.
They didn't even care.
You could have literally, in fact, I'm even convinced, you could have put out the exact same bill.
You could have literally printed and proposed the exact same bill and just named it Trumpcare, just changed Trumpcare, and they would have said no.
Because that's basically what they did.
And by the way, all of these Democrats up here saying, higher premiums, less options.
And while maybe you could say you're not hearing enough from Trump on this proposed bill and you want to hear Trump say, no, full repeal, stop with any sort of this care, let's full repeal Obamacare.
I think maybe he had an idea that this wasn't going to pass, and that's why he kind of just wiped his hands of it and said, go ahead, Paul Ryan, go ahead, House.
Do what you got to do.
I know the votes aren't going to be there, so we're just going to have to come right back to the drawing board.
And that's where we're at now.
And I hope that the drawing board continues to be erased until there's a full repeal of Obamacare.
I don't understand this.
I've listened to hours and hours and hours and hours of this health care hearing.
I haven't heard one representative just say, why don't we go back to the way it was before?
Did we not have healthcare in this country before Obamacare?
Also in the news today, and we're going to get really what we're going to cover today is we're going to go full court press on fluoride, which is, I think, a big health issue that, of course, none of these jerk offs will talk about in the House or Senate.
Very few will.
You might get a couple here, but here's Nunes.
This is on Fox News.
Says, information from Trump surveillance concerned me.
And it came out on the other news agencies were showing, oh, he was surveilled.
He was surveilled.
And the big thing with this...
Is the unmasking of names and how it was distributed through the intelligence circle.
So when a foreign entity like GHCQ grabs communications from us, or the NSA is grabbing communications from foreign dignitaries calling here and talking to people, they mask the names of the Americans they're talking about.
So it'll say, blank, talk to so-and-so about this.
They said this.
Well, when you unmask it, for people who don't know, They reveal those names.
So they revealed the names of the Americans, which included Trump and his associates on the transition team, and then they sent them around.
And so Nunez said, it concerned me about the surveillance.
And of course they go, there was no wiretapping of Trump Tower.
That didn't happen.
Well, how did they get these communications?
How did they get names?
How did they unmask names?
Because they had transcripts, and if they have transcripts, they have recordings.
That's the only way this stuff works.
And so he says it was obtained legally, meaning they were watching who they were talking to, foreign dignitaries.
President Trump, how many calls did he make after he got elected president in Trump Tower?
They were talking every day who he was talking to.
They're going to do the same thing that they did with Hillary Clinton where they can't prove intent.
Well, okay, you know, we found out that unwittingly there may have been some surveillance, or unwittingly this may have been recorded, or this or that, or yes, actually, by law, we record all of these conversations.
Okay, yes, the NSA actually has all this database.
So it'll be interesting to see what the fallout is from this Obamacare repeal and replace fiasco that I think they were basically giving Paul Ryan, who probably said, I'll take it.
So, the information leaked to CNN this week, unlike Nunez Intelligence League, could be a real bombshell.
If it turns out to be true, one law enforcement official told CNN, the information in hand suggests people connected to the campaign were in contact with Russian operatives and appeared they were giving the thumbs up to release information when it was ready.
And it's going to be...
Donald Trump met with somebody at the convention when the ambassador came by and talked to Flynn in a group.
And this totally came on the heels of what Nunes was talking about.
So they're going to throw this out so people ignore that.
John Schindler, a conservative columnist for the New York Observer and former National Security Agency analyst, declared on Twitter that Trump will be forced out and his cronies will be indicted.
Get ready.
And there's not going to be any talk about how unmasking of names happened and how it was thrown out to the whole world to see in the intelligence community.
I really want to see what Nunez has to say for himself because he's gone back and forth on this deal.
He's literally been a flip-flopper.
During the original hearings, maybe he was genuine in his questions.
Maybe he really thought that this could be potential and he was actually trying to ask these questions to look for answers and just didn't get them and then kind of came over to the other side.
That was kind of my understanding of it.
So then he doesn't get any answers to the Apparently serious allegations against Trump and his Russia connections.
So then he says, alright, well let me look at what Trump's saying about the wiretapping.
Looks into that, finds answers, finds information, comes out and says, look, I was here on the Hill yesterday, I asked all of these questions to try to figure out what Donald Trump's connections with Russia is, and the people alleging these claims had no answers for me.
I looked into Donald Trump's claims that he was being wiretapped, or let's be more broad, surveilled, and guess what?
I found intel that proves that that's actually accurate.
So then this morning, again, like we said earlier in the broadcast, the narrative this morning is that Nunes is coming out again.
He's calling for closed hearings.
He wants closed sessions to talk to these people about concerning information and intelligence that he received about Donald Trump being surveilled.
But then...
A few hours later, all of a sudden, they're running stories saying that Nunes is backing down from his assertion that Trump was being monitored at all.
Now, I haven't heard from Nunes.
These are all just news stories that have come across.
So I don't know what he's actually saying, but it'll be interesting to watch because, like I said, he's kind of flip-flopped back and forth on this issue.
And that's what a lot of the people from the Republican side of the aisle were saying today to the Democrats.
You know, the only reason why we're having these hearings, the only reason why we're still in here talking about this is because Obamacare is such a failure.
And you can deny it all you want, and you can try to stand your ground on Obamacare, but guess what?
You're still here, you're still having these debates, and you're still at these hearings, because it's still failing.
And you know, that maybe, I was gonna say, maybe that's where he still stands, because he met Keep this in mind.
Yesterday, he met with Rand Paul and the Freedom Caucus, which actually comprises of Democrats and Republicans, and the Freedom Caucus, added with the Democrats, can stall this bill or any bill in the House that comes across the table.
Trump knew that.
He knew that coming in.
When he met with Rand Paul and the Freedom House Caucus, he knew, based on the numbers, that he was not going to get the vote.
And he continued to put the mandate out that said vote or it's Obamacare.
And then what happens?
Paul Ryan pulls the vote for the second day in a row.
So again, you know, I think it's perfectly reasonable to say, hey, Donald, we don't like this bill.
We want full repeal.
Why aren't you listening to us on this?
But if you kind of look at the way he's handled it, he's kind of put the ball in Paul Ryan's court, which is dangerous.
But Paul Ryan, I guess, is a loser.
He continues to miss.
And we are stuck with Obamacare, which if that's what Trump wants to prove is a total failure, that's what he's got right now, at least for the time being.
And so right now you're looking at all this healthcare news and going, God, what can I do to work with my healthcare?
How do I make myself healthy if the people in Congress are just going to keep messing around with this flawed insurance system, making people buy something they don't need?
Well...
Do you know what's in your water?
Do you know?
Have you ever looked and seen the contents in your water bill?
Actually, once a year, they'll send you all the different things they put into it.
And if you live in Austin, like I do, they put this chemical in your water called fluoride.
And I think that's what we're going to talk about for the remainder of the show.
And I want to start with Exhibit A. Guys, I'm going to put this right here.
And Exhibit A is a Harvard study, and it's called The Impact of Fluoride on Neurological Development in Children.
Because one of the big things they say is the reason we put fluoride in your water is to help children have stronger teeth.
This is what they say.
They want children to have strong teeth, even though you drink water and it goes in your stomach.
Children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low fluoride areas.
The children studied were up to 14 years of age, but the investigators speculated that any toxic effect on the brain, on brain development, may have happened earlier, and that the brain may not be fully capable of compensating for the toxicity.
And here's a quote.
Fluoride seems to fit in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that cause chemical brain drain.
The effect of each toxicant may seem small, but the combined damage of the population scale can be serious, especially because the brain power of the next generation is crucial to all of us.
It's kind of like what we were talking yesterday with the inbreeding and your generations are getting dumber and dumber.
Well, this is another way they're dumbing people down.
He's a biochemist who also studied the effects of fluoride and wrote two books on what fluoride does to your body.
So I think let's play Dr. Blalock first.
This is Russell Blalock, whom I interviewed back in, I believe, 2010 or 11. And we were talking about a lot of things.
We did a section on fluoride, and this is a short section of a full interview that we did with Dr. Blalock.
Amazing individual.
I believe he puts out a newsletter called the Blalock Report through Newsmax, and he's been doing that for years.
And it's funny, listening to a brain surgeon when he's on the Alex Jones Show talking about the New World Order and globalism and what it's doing to large populations of people, and it's not for the better.
So let's go to Russell Blalock first, and then we're going to cover all this fluoride news, including showing you what the science lab MSDSs are.
Of how poisonous this is.
And we're going to show you some hidden camera footage we shot.
In fact, I shot this a few years ago in a local Austin water treatment plant.
And I'll show you where they hooked the fluoride up from these giant tanks, tanker trucks that they drive cross country from Florida.
They hook it up to these tanks and pump it into a pump house.
And there's warning signs everywhere.
Don't get this stuff on you.
This is poison.
And so they put it in your drinking water.
They tell you it's for your teeth.
So you swallow it.
Alright?
Start asking yourself, does that make sense?
And while you're watching this video, run into your bathroom real quick and grab your toothpaste and look at the back of it.
Because it's got fluoride too.
It's a little different.
It's called sodium fluoride.
And look and see what the back of it says.
It says, don't swallow this.
So if it's good for your teeth, but you're not supposed to swallow it, why do they put it in your water that you swallow?
Ask yourself these questions.
And then get mad and then ask yourself what you're going to do about it.
Let's go to Dr. Blalock.
unidentified
If you gave the fluoride after birth, the animal became very lethargic, sort of like a couch potato.
Didn't really want to do anything.
Became very apathetic acting.
So this was a very clear effect with objective, computerized evaluation of the behavior of these animals.
She used over 500 animals.
She completed this research and she also measured the fluoride levels in the animal's brain and found some very interesting things.
Fluoride tends to accumulate in the part of the brain that controls behavior, particularly the hippocampus and the other limbic areas of the brain.
She brought this research to the National Institutes of Health.
They asked her to present this.
And the results of her research.
Well, at the same time, after she wrote up her research, she had presented it in one of the very prestigious journals to be published.
And they didn't know it.
So she presented it to the National Institute of Health, and their response was very cold.
And she said when she was walking through the National Institutes of Health, all the walls were adorned with big posters proclaiming the effectiveness of fluoridation of water and promoting the fluoridation of water.
And she said, this is a very objective audience I'm speaking to.
Well, they were very hostile and very cold to her during her presentation and didn't even ask questions.
So when she got back to her institute, they asked her about sending this to a journal to be published, and they wanted the name of the journal.
Well, she wouldn't tell them because she knew they would try to stop the publication, try to influence the journal not to publish it.
So she wouldn't tell them, and it was published, much to their dismay and anger.
A wide audience of scientists began to look at this research, which for the first time proved that fluoride added to water in the concentrations that humans are exposed to was producing profound changes in the brain and altering behavior of young animals exposed to it.
We have to realize at the time, women were adding fluoridated water to reconstitute the baby food.
Well, over half of babies get reconstituted baby food.
They're not breastfed.
So this was tens of millions of babies were being exposed to concentrations of fluoride that were used in this experiment.
After they found that this had been published, they fired her.
And the Forsyth Dental Research Institute, in fact, about that time had gotten a quarter million dollar grant from the Colgate Company, which floridates their toothpaste.
So she was fired from her job.
She's never gotten another federal grant.
And she was one of the top neurotoxicologists in the world.
She had created this innovative new system.
Well, she went back to her lab to get the rats' brains so that she could continue research on her own.
It turns out they had flooded the lab, claimed there was a break in a water pipe.
It destroyed her computer system, and they killed all the rats and incinerated them.
So there is no tissue left to do any studies on.
All of these things look rather suspicious, so you have to come to your own conclusion.
What does this mean?
Number one, we know that there's numerous health effects of adding fluoride to water.
We know fluoride bioaccumulates in the human body.
That means it just keeps getting higher and higher concentrations the more you drink water.
If you want to produce the highest concentration of a mineral, you don't put it in the food, you put it in the water, because people drink a lot of water, particularly in warmer climates.
So that produces the highest level of bile accumulation, and that's what we were saying.
Well, Dr. Yamanyanis did some studies and looked at the different tissues in the body, found out the highest accumulation was in the thyroid gland.
It had been known that one way to reduce thyroid function was to put fluoride in the water.
That it produced a significant hypothyroidism or low function of the thyroid gland.
Now not only does that produce lethargy, apathy, weakness, tiredness in adults, but if you do it in pregnant women, the babies are born with low IQs and they never recover.
So even mild reduction of thyroid function in pregnant women has now been shown to produce significant neurobehavioral problems in their offspring.
So we've got some rather profound problems with fluoridation that are now well documented from laboratories all over the world.
Without any question, for instance, one of them Dr. Varner did out of Europe in which he looked at.5 parts per million, which is half of what's put in water, and found significant death of neurons in the brain and damage to the blood vessels that supply blood to the brain.
He's a highly regarded researcher.
It was published in a very prestigious neurological journal.
So we have all of these studies proving that this is a very hazardous thing to do, that it produces behavioral changes, many of which we're seeing in the populations that are drinking fluoridated water.
We know it bioaccumulates, it gets worse over time.
We know that it's absorbed into the plants and the foods, and the concentration in the foods is rising significantly.
Yet, we have a government that is still pushing as hard as they can, using taxpayer money, to get all the water supply in the United States fluoridated.
So I leave it to the audience to think for themselves, what could possibly be the justification for doing such a thing?
If you've demonstrated it doesn't reach its objective, that is, reducing cavities, which everybody now has admitted, even the ADA has admitted it, why is it still being added to the water?
If it has these profound health effects, why is it still being added to the water?
And even the ADA had to admit recently that it is harmful to the baby's brain, and they put out a warning.
Now, this is just on the government's sites and on their own site.
Women should not reconstitute their baby food with tap water that Florida did.
Well, you don't see that as a headline in your newspaper.
You don't see it on most major news TV stories.
Which would reach most women, it's just sort of kept under the cover so they can say, well, we did put out the warning.
We just didn't make it a widespread warning.
So a lot of women are still reconstituting their baby's infant formula with fluoridated tap water that even the ADA now admits is harmful to their brains.
So if we start looking at some of the other things that are being done in this society, for instance, the use of aspartame, widespread use of aspartame, which is also proven to be a...
But actually, they quit making that because the ACA announcements, or I'm sorry, the CDC announcements, and everything that was coming out of the ADA, the Dental Association, It was getting so public.
Protesters demand filters if council adds fluoride to water.
These are people who don't have fluoride in their water yet.
And they say they want filters.
So this is World Water Day, a group marked through Nelson's Main Street to keep the city's water fluoride free, requesting water filters and water rate rebates if fluoride is added.
More than 60 anti-fluoride protesters took a letter from the church steps to the Nelson City Council offices.
And they wanted to address the mayor and they don't like it because it's forced treatments.
They're putting a chemical in your water and you can't control the dose.
If you drink a lot of water, you're going to get more fluoride.
If you drink less water, you're going to get less fluoride.
Actually, the original statement that the CDC made and the World Health Organization made when they were fluoridating the water in America was, we actually have no proof that this prevents cavities.
What they found, they also go back inside a study in the 1940s.
In fact, I wrote an article on this, one of the few articles I ever wrote for InfoWars, and it's thoroughly, I should have printed that one out.
In fact, I'll do that when we go to this next video, and we could go over some of the finer points of that.
But back in the 40s, they found that people that had calcium fluoride in their water, which is a natural form of fluoride, Which isn't necessarily toxic for you unless you get a lot of it.
But it's not hydrofluorosilic acid.
It's not sodium fluoride.
Sodium fluoride is also one of the main ingredients in rat poison.
There we go.
WorldNet Daily writer says fluoride is good for you.
And all the studies and how the government says you need more and how they would go to orphanages and put extra fluoride in their areas.
There it is, 1943 discovery.
So they said, okay...
Well, we can...
And around that time, they also had phosphate fertilizer companies that were...
Because this was in the agricultural boom.
And we needed more phosphate fertilizers because we've been depleting the minerals in our soil.
And so the way you make phosphate fertilizer, well, you have to cook a lot of stuff.
But when the smoke comes up, it was going into crops and damaging livestock all around.
This was in Florida because they were digging it out of the ground in Florida.
And so they came up with a law and said, hey, you got to use water sprayers and you got to put water sprayers, they call them scrubbers, at the top of your smokestacks and it's going to hit the smoke and it actually turns the, I don't know all the technical terms of it, but it turns it into hydrofluorosilicate, I think is what it comes as.
And it comes down and they collect it and then Con Agra sells this stuff to a company called Lucier.
Some government agencies that don't even, they took the fluoride out of their water.
Oh, thank you.
Yeah, this is my tome that I wrote back in 2010. The calcium fluoride known as fluoride is mined and is more expensive than sodium fluoride or hydrofluorosilicic acid or sodium silico fluorate, which are byproducts of the aluminum and phosphate fertilizer industry.
That's right.
So they take industrial waste, distill it, and put it in your water and tell you it's good for you.
This is what happens when the truck driving with the fluoride, it crashes.
Okay, this happened back in the day.
A spill incident of the chemical on an interstate in Florida covering an area of 600 feet long by 60 feet wide resulted in the visit of more than 50 people to the hospital.
Individuals complained of skin and respiratory irritation, including burning in the throat and headaches.
A man riding in a truck with his arm out the window experienced burning on his forearm.
The effects of long-term exposure to fluorosilicic acid are changes in bone, corrosivity of the mucous membranes, ulceration of the nose, throat, and bronchial tubes, coughing, shock, pulmonary edema, fluorosis, coma, and even death.
The workers engaged for approximately 30 years in the production of phosphate fertilizers, 9 out of 50 observed that they had decreased bone densities.
When swallowed, severe irritation of the lungs, nose, and throat can occur, as well as severe damage to the throat and stomach.
A probable lethal dose of 50 to 500, I believe that's micrograms per kilogram, classified as very toxic, has been reported for doses between one teaspoon and one ounce for a 150-pound person.
You know, it's funny because you were talking earlier when we had the Life Science article pulled up.
You were like, oh, I wonder what Life Science says.
Like, I bet they're, you know, saying it's good for you.
I was actually shocked, especially considering...
What I've experienced lately with Google manipulating search results, I was shocked, but I'm telling you, when I went and I did, I mean, I Googled it.
I'm still addicted to Google.
I still need to find these alternative.
People sent some to me like DuckDuckGo or something, but that's another topic for another day.
When I Googled fluoride and water and all different keywords and search terms like that, I'm telling you, Rob, it was like every source was like, yeah, it's bad, man.
Here in Austin, and they laugh at the people who go after fluoride.
They laugh at them, and then they keep it in there, and the mayor, I think it was Leif Leffingwell.
Let me see that.
They say stuff like...
Oh, my dentist said it's good.
You know why dentists say it's good?
It's because most of the dental foundations and organizations are funded by large groups like Colgate who love to put fluoride in your toothpaste because they're part of the problem.
This is part of that big industrial...
Yeah, there he is.
When is this from?
Oh, 2015. Yeah, we have a lot of protests here in Austin.
And one of my favorite activists is Linda Green, who I've had on the show many times.
And she goes there and fights all the time.
So that's what you have to do.
You have to get yourself armed with some facts and go to these meetings.
Because here's one from Durango.
Many people don't know the true source of fluoride that Durango adds to its drinking water, and this guy sourced it.
And its industrial sodium fluoride from China is used in water fluoridation in Durango.
So they're trying to get it out of their water in Durango, Colorado.
And if you look, most of the country is fluoridated.
People that come up in, you know, medical school and everything and work their way into doctor's degrees and everything and give the vaccines.
They'll always tell you they're safe.
Is that the other thing?
Because that's what they were taught.
That was the propaganda they were fed and they never saw anything different.
And I'm guessing it's the same thing for Dennis because I, at least I've experienced the same thing when I bring up You know, bad vaccines to doctors or my doctors, they usually scoff at it.
When I bring up fluoride to dentists or my dentists, they usually scoff at it.
So it's kind of the same paradigm there, even though, like we've illustrated, I mean, we can go on and on.
I mean, I've got, you know, 20 different stories here.
Take 12 months of your life to avoid tap water or just only drink filtered water Maybe do nascent iodine, Survival Shield X2, and I'm telling you, you will notice a difference in your cognition, your energy, the ability to sleep and get up without feeling groggy.
I mean, I'd be shocked if there was any human that gave that a 12-month run and didn't experience life-changing events.
I think the most important thing to recognize about fluoride is that it's extremely toxic.
It is very active biologically, interfering with many basic biochemical processes, enzymes, G proteins, hydrogen bonds, and so on.
So it shouldn't surprise us that there's a wide range of health effects that are attributed to fluoride.
But the bottom line is that fluoride is extremely active biologically, that the first opponents of fluoridation going back to the 1950s were biochemists, including scientists like James Sumner, who won a Nobel Prize for enzyme chemistry.
and incidentally there is no doubt that fluoride damages health because millions of people in India China and parts of Africa have had their health ruined by fluoride the people have been crippled by fluoride and many other health effects the argument As far as fluoridation is concerned,
is there an adequate margin of safety between the doses which cause this known harm, and incidentally documented in this report by the National Research Council published in 2006, here a fairly independent balanced panel looked at the literature for three years and in this 507 page report and 1100 references indicated that the EPA safe drinking water standard for fluoridation for fluoride is four parts per million it's
not safe it's not protective of health and needs to be lowered but before I get into the health effects let me explain my first concern which remains my top concern The level of fluoride in mother's milk, mother's breast milk, baby's first meal, is extremely low.
It's.004 parts per million.
That means a bottle-fed baby in a fluoridated community in the United States, where we fluoridate the water at one part per million, is getting 250 times higher dose of fluoride than a breastfed baby.
And that is extremely disturbing.
This is a hazardous waste.
No question about it.
It's not only hexafluorosilicic acid, but it's a lot of crap that Neil was talking about.
It's got lead and arsenic and mercury and radioactive isotopes.
Maybe trace amounts.
They can't dump that into the sea by international law.
They can't dump it locally because it's too concentrated.
But wait for it.
If someone buys it from them, you take away the label hazardous waste, and it becomes a product.
It becomes a product.
And who's going to buy this stuff from them?
Oh, our water department.
So the water departments buy this hazardous waste, it becomes a product, and now they put it in our drinking water.
And now, let me go through the list of health concerns.
Some of them are more certain than others.
Let me begin with the certain one.
Dental fluorosis.
Fluoride causes a discoloration mottling of the tooth enamel.
When this practice began in 1945, the promoters of fluoridation thought they could limit dental fluorosis to 10% of the children in its very mild form.
And the very mild form has little specks of white, opaque patches on the cusp of the teeth, up to 25%.
And they thought that only dentists would notice this, and was an acceptable trade-off with what they thought would be a lowering of tooth decay.
Well, in November of 2010, the Center of Disease Control told us that children aged 12 to 15 in the United States, 41% of them now have dental fluorosis.
Not only the very mild, but the mild, which impacts up to 50% of the tooth surface, moderate, which impacts up to 100% of the tooth surface, and severe, where you not only have the whole surface impacted, but indentations, chipping of the teeth, and so on.
And 3.6% of children aged 12 to 15 in the United States have either moderate or severe dental fluorosis.
So that trade-off between lowering tooth decay and producing dental fluorosis but holding it only to 10% clearly was a failure.
We have four times more dental fluorosis as intended and as desired.
Our attitude is that when you see this dental fluorosis, it means the child has been overexposed to fluoride, and the question is, what other tissues have been affected?
So let's start with the bone, because the teeth are a window into the bone.
In fact, the teeth actually grow out of the jaw, the jawbone.
And by the time the permanent teeth have come out, the jawbone has been loaded up with fluoride.
And so if you can see the damage to the growing tooth cells, what did the fluoride do to the growing bone cells during this 8, 9, 10 period?
In fact, the first study that was published on this in 1955 indicated that the children in the fluoridated community, which was Newburgh, New York, had twice as much cortical bone defects as the children in the non-fluoridated community.
Now the cortical bone is the outside layer of the bone, and that's the layer, it's a lamellar structure, and that part of the bone is meant to protect against fractures.
And so the concern then is whether we're increasing bone fractures in children.
Well, we had to wait until 2001 before someone investigated this, and researchers in Mexico found a linear correlation as the severity of dental fluorosis went up.
Meaning the amount of fluoride the child had been exposed to before the permanent teeth had erupted.
As that went up, so did bone fractures in the children.
And it was quite striking.
When you go from no dental fluorosis to very mild dental fluorosis, it doubled.
The bone fractures doubled.
Very mild to mild, doubled again.
Mild to moderate, doubled again.
The next concern about bone is that the first symptoms of bone poisoning in an adult are just like arthritis, stiff joints, pains in the joints, pains in the bone.
In the United States, we have one in three adults now with some form of arthritis, and if you ask a doctor what's causing it, they will say, well, we don't really know, but we think it's got something to do with aging.
Well, what also parallels aging, of course, is the number of years you spent in a fluoridated community.
10 years, 20 years, 30 years, 40 years, 50 years, eventually 60, 70, and so on.
The next concern is as the fluoride continues to build up in the bone, and I should say that up to 50% of all the fluoride that we take in each day accumulates in the bone.
The fluoride is bioaccumulative.
The bones get more brittle, and another major concern is increased hip fractures in adults.
The studies done in China, as documented in this National Research Council report, and we further elaborated in our book, The Case Against Fluoride, indicates that levels as low as three milligrams per day That's three liters of fluoridated water per day may increase hip fractures in the elderly.
Now, my major concern is not the bones, although I think that's significant.
My major concern is the brain, because when the baby is born, the blood-brain barrier is not fully formed.
We think the blood-brain barrier keeps fluoride out of the brain most of the time, but for the first half year of the baby's life, the fluoride can get into the brain.
And this is not the time in my view and the view of many other scientists that a baby should be exposed to fluoride at 250 times the level in mother's milk.
There have now been over a hundred animal studies which shows that fluoride damages the brain.
There have also been 23 IQ studies, most of them from China, but one from India, one from Iran, and one from Mexico, which show an association between moderate exposure to fluoride and lowered IQ in children.
I actually visited the villages where one of these studies was done.
It was a very good study.
They controlled for lead, they controlled for iodine, Most of the two villages were almost identical, except for the fact that their well water was different.
And the author of this study estimated that the IQ would be lowered at 1.9 parts per million.
And that offers no adequate margin of safety for children drinking Water at one parts per million when you consider the massive range of sensitivity to any toxic effect and the fact that once you put fluoride in the water you can't control the dose.
Another concern which many of us have had for many years is fluoride's impact on the thyroid gland.
Between the 30s and the 50s, doctors in Argentina, France, and Germany were giving patients with hyperthyroidism, overactive thyroid gland, sodium fluoride tablets to lower thyroid function.
And the doses that they were using were between 2.5 and 4.5 milligrams per day, which is exceeded by many people drinking fluoridated water.
For example, the Institute of Medicine actually advises people to drink three liters of water a day.
So clearly then they would be in the range for lowered thyroid function.
And once again, as in many of these other issues, the fluoridating countries, including the United States, are simply not doing the studies.
They're not investigating to see if there's a relationship between fluoridation and lowered IQ, fluoridation and arthritis, fluoridation and hypothyroidism.
Key health studies have not been done in fluoridated countries.
If you don't look, you don't find.
They would like to imply, because they don't see anything, there's nothing wrong.
But if they're not looking, they won't find.
You often hear the promoters say things like, oh, we've been doing this for 60 years.
If there's any problem, we would know about it by now.
Oh, no, you wouldn't unless you were doing the studies.
Another issue that came out in 1997 was a researcher in England found that fluoride accumulated in the human pineal gland, and the pineal gland is a little gland between the two parts of the brain, the two hemispheres of the brain.
It's not protected by the blood-brain barrier.
It has a high perfusion rate of blood, and it also is a calcifying tissue like the teeth and the bones.
And so this researcher hypothesized that fluoride would be attracted to this This little gland, like a magnet.
And sure enough, when she investigated, the average level of fluoride on these little calcium hydroxyapatite crystals was 9,000 parts per million, up to 21,000 parts per million, which means that this little gland has a higher concentration of fluoride than any other tissue in the body, including the bone.
This researcher, Jennifer Luke, also did animal studies, and in the animal studies she found that fluoride lowered the production of melatonin, the hormone that this little gland makes, and incidentally it only makes it at night, the hormone of darkness.
This pineal gland reacts to light.
Descartes called it the seat of the soul.
Not only did it lower melatonin levels in these animals, but also shorten the time to puberty, which is absolutely consistent.
Melatonin is thought to act like a biological clock, involved with timing, timing of puberty, timing of aging, timing of jet lag and sleeping patterns and so on.
It controls all kinds of things.
And what they think happens with the child, at birth the melatonin levels are high and with childhood they gradually lower and at a certain point the lowered melatonin levels trigger the production of the sex hormones leading to puberty.
Ironically, that first study that was published, which I already referred to in The Bones, also recorded that the young girls in the fluoridated community, Newburgh, were menstruating on average five months earlier than the young girls in the non-fluoridated community.
Now, they didn't think that was significant at the time.
Now, with Jennifer Luke's work, it clearly takes on a new perspective.
Kids now are reaching puberty seven, eight, nine.
It has people very, very worried.
But once again, the fluoridating countries have made absolutely no effort to reproduce Jennifer Luke's work.
It is not difficult.
They could have done it easily.
The Department of Health and Human Services has adopted to this, quote, sacred policy of fluoridation is to deny, deny, deny, Critique the methodologies, but don't attempt to reproduce the studies.
If you don't look, you don't find.
And they're using the absence of study as if it was the same as the absence of harm, which is absolutely ridiculous, utterly irresponsible.
So now they're giving every indication, particularly the center of disease control that avidly promotes fluoridation around the United States and around the world for that matter.
The impression that they give is that it's more important now to protect this practice than to protect the health of the American people and our babies and our children.
It's almost as if the teeth Have become the most important tissue, the most important organ in the body instead of our brains, instead of our thyroid glands, instead of our pineal glands, instead of our...
You heard Dr. Blalock earlier talking about how they literally went and took this lady's research with rats and flooded her office and killed all the animals and incinerated them.
I mean, there's a lot of money involved in just Austin alone.
It's like a million dollars a year business that they take taking this, this poison, this toxic waste poison that they would have to pay to put somewhere like a Superfund site.
Well, now they just put it in your drinking water and they charge you for it.
And yeah, you pay for it.
You pay for it in your water bills.
So Here's what...
There's a doctor named Lynn Marcus.
He was a senior science advisor at the EPA's Office of Drinking Water.
He was fired in response to a whistleblowing memo calling for a review of the cover-up of the National Toxicology Program study that demonstrates that fluoride is a probable human carcinogen.
That means it causes cancer.
Here's what he wrote.
The type of cancer particularly concerned with fluoride, although not the only type, is osteosarcoma, especially in males.
That's bone cancer.
The National Toxicology Program counted a two-year study in which rats and mice were given sodium fluoride in drinking water.
The positive result of that study, in which malignancies in tissues other than bone were also observed, particularly in the male rats, is convergent with a host of data from tests showing fluoride's ability to cause mutations, the principal trigger mechanism for cells to become cancerous.
And data showing increases osteosarcoma in young men in New Jersey, Washington, Iowa, based on their drinking water, fluoridated water.
In his analysis, he repeated statements about these and other criminating cancer data, and his request for independent, unbiased evaluation of them got Dr. Marcus fired.
So there it is.
That's right.
Sorry, I was getting caught.
Here, you can bring that back up right there.
Request for independent, unbiased evaluation of fluoride.
A closed-door panel determined at Harvard stated the professor did not intentionally suppress the findings.
Not intentionally.
His research shows a clear carcinogenic link, especially in young boys, that Harvard would have us believe when industry insiders withhold evidence in their studies, it's not intentional suppression.
And I wrote this in 2010. In 2012, another Harvard study came out showing that it was neurotoxic, as bad as lead, as bad as aluminum.
You know, and I would just say this because I've actually had debates with people who think that we need the fluoride in the water.
And one argument that I hear that maybe I could, you know, take a little credence from is that, okay, the water that they're pulling in is probably filthy and disgusting.
It needs filtered.
Maybe it needs the fluoride to go in there and kill bacteria or something like that.
There might be a process throughout the filtration that maybe you need to put the fluoride in there.
Okay, so but why are you feeding it to us?
Why don't you give, after you treat the water with fluoride, why don't you then filter it with reverse osmosis or filter it through a gravity filter, filter it through something else to actually get the poison out?
They just add the poison, and if they want to say, well, this is part of the process to clean the water so that you can drink it, well, filter it back out!
If you have to add the poison to filter in the first place, can you take the poison out before I drink it?
But you know what?
I don't drink it anymore, so that's how you deal with that.
According to Mr. Makongo, there are also invisible effects, including hydrophilic syndromes, which I don't know what that is, nerve paralysis, muscle pains, and overall body tiredness.
And I think it was this story that you were just reading that cited the blood-brain barrier.
I don't know if it was that one or it was before that, but...
The interesting thing about the blood-brain barrier is that a female's blood-brain barrier is thicker than a male's.
And actually, I'd have to check the study, but I actually think that the blood-brain barrier might even be thicker in Caucasian males than African-American males, I think was another study.
I'd have to double check that.
But the point is...
So the same results that you're going to see with vaccines, and this is measurable.
You can see with vaccines that more boys get affected with autism or side effects of vaccines than females do.
That's because there is a thicker blood-brain barrier.
Well, you can say the same thing about fluoride in the water, and if you actually look at it, You can actually start to see this playing out in colleges and in schools where girls are getting higher grades than guys.
Girls are graduating from college at a quicker rate than males are now.
And could this be based on the thicker blood-brain barrier that the fluoride doesn't affect females as much as males?
Could it be the same thing with vaccines that we already have the numbers?
Males get autism from vaccine or...
Okay, not from vaccines, whatever.
Males get autism more than females.
Oh, well, how can you make sense of that?
Blood-brain barrier, thicker in females.
The vaccine cannot penetrate as easily as it can in a male.
And you know what happens is, here's what happens with this, Rob, is see, because Finland isn't an invasive country, because Finland isn't imposing around the world, they can focus...
Their efforts and their funding on schools and health.
Whereas here in America, most of our funding goes towards war and military spending, which you can point the finger right at Donald Trump.
You know, and I'm seeing those stories though, Rob, but I mean, maybe I'm just missing them, but I'm yet to see many stories where they actually listen to the people.
I've seen stories all over.
A lot of it, when I was living in St. Louis, some of the people out in the western suburbs in the county areas were protesting the fluoride in the water, but they never got any government action.
I've heard about groups protesting fluoride in the water everywhere, but I haven't seen any government action.
So I don't know what's up with that.
They just get ignored.
And then...
Rob...
This is just so cyclical.
So, we poison ourselves with the vaccines, we poison ourselves with the fluoride in the water, we poison ourselves with the unhealthy food we eat and all the ingredients, and then we have to pay for all of it with damn government healthcare!
So I gotta pay for a bunch of dumbasses who wanna drink fluoride all day, eat aspartame all day, and eat GMO all day, and have a McDonald's double cheeseburger every day.
Rogersville begins the process of removing fluoride from water treatment.
Water Superintendent Sean Hatchett told Rogersville Board of, I guess it's somewhere in Tennessee, and the Mayor Adelman have shown that putting fluoride into public water has little effect on the oral health of those who drink it.
Fluoride does, however, cost the city of Rogersville $40,000 annually.
The city attorney, Bill Phillips, noted that although there was an advisory referendum in the 1950s to add fluoride to Rogersville's water treatment process, it's not necessary to have another referendum to remove the fluoride.
So basically they're doing it just by one guy in the government saying, hey, this is costing a lot of money.
It's corroding the pipes.
It's going to cost us more money down the road.
Why don't we just get rid of it?
And basically it's not doing anything except helping people prevent cavities between the ages of 12 and 14, he said.
That's the largest study ever done in two communities, one fluoridated and one not.
Even though they don't have the science to prove it, let's just go along with the theory that fluoride helps fight cavities.
Okay, fine.
Then I'll take your toothpaste with fluoride in it, even though I use Super Blue and I find it works better.
I'll take your fluoride toothpaste and you know what?
I'll brush my teeth with it, okay?
And that's how I'll prevent cavities.
Adding it to the water doesn't do anything.
What do you do when you drink water?
You drink it.
You open up your gullet and you drink it.
You ingest it.
You don't swish it around in your teeth.
You don't swish it around in your mouth.
You don't put it on a toothbrush and just use the water.
This is absurd.
And I'm telling you, as soon as you do research into what they're putting in the tap water, it is not going to be very easy to rinse your mouth with tap water ever again.
Countries who do not fluoridate their water have also seen a big drop in the rate of cavities.
Now, I wonder if the Dental Association puts fluoride and says you need fluoride in your toothpaste so you get cavities and have to go to the dentist more often.
just like Monsanto has organic foods they eat in their building.
I have never been able to find this.
Maybe I could go through.
I don't remember if it was on Twitter or Facebook.
Somebody sent me the original document, the original declaration from the CDC and the World Health Organization about adding fluoride to the American water.
And they say, they admit in the original press release, they admit they do not have the science that proves that it causes cavities.
I think it was the EPA. It was a government agency that pulled fluoride out of their drinking water fountains in their government building.
And it was the same.
It's one of the same organizations that's telling people to put fluoride in their water.
And while he's finding that, I want to read this excellent, this is the, I guess, the kudos of the day.
In case you're wondering how you can support us, how, you know, we bring information to you, massive amount of information today on fluoride, but how you can support us, you go to InfoWarsStore.com.
This is a review of Brain Force, a five-star review.
The title is Excellent Product Exceeded My Expectation.
I love Brain Force.
It has transformed my productivity at work.
And I've been able to replace coffee with this incredible natural alternative.
After long days, I would normally be exhausted.
Now I'm clear-headed and alert.
I highly recommend this to others where there are benefits and I'll let you discover for yourself.
But it is a supplement that has made a huge difference in my quality of life.
And that's just one of the many reviews you can find on Brain Force.
You can always find the free streams at Infowars.com forward slash show.
We also put out a ton of streams on our Facebook and YouTube channel.
Thank you for watching.
Please remember to go to infowarsstore.com and support us because you get great products.
You also support us what we do here, pay for the lights, camera, the crew in the back.
None of this stuff is free and you have to put a price on something.
So please consider supporting us.
Go on to Infowarsstore.com.
We need your support more than anything in the world.
It helps keep this going.
It helps us grow.
We are under constant attack.
Our social media sites are constantly getting messed with.
We're getting hacked.
There's all kinds of things going on behind the scenes.
And I guess they've attempted to hack us a couple times.
We've had some denial of service attacks that we've been able to withstand.
But it's because of your support that we're able to do that and grow in these times.
So we thank you for supporting us.
Keep spreading the word about what we're doing.
Spread the articles.
Spread the videos.
And together we can grow and get out there and start becoming an activist in your area.
Flint, Michigan is not the only place in the world that has dirty water.
Okay?
Flint, Michigan is the only place you got to worry about.
Got another thing coming.
It's all your water out there.
63% of our country is being poisoned with fluoride right now.
So you're probably in that niche group that is being poisoned.
So get up off your keister and do something about it.
Start going and speaking out at some of these city council meetings and start a movement.
Get people involved.
It's easy.
You just got to get up and do something, okay?
Don't wait for somebody else to do it.
You be that person that gets up and does it yourself.
And with that, thanks for watching.
I'm Rob do Owen Schroer, and we'll see you next time.
unidentified
Mr. Armstrong, you'd mentioned in your answer to, I think, Ms. Spears question that there are other RTs operating in the Ms. Spears question that there are other RTs operating in the U I think you have them feeding other entities.
Infowars comes to mind.
And now secret to playing a Russian agent The Russian I must warn you, nobody pulls off playing Russian better than me.
The one link is an average American kid who's about to find out his entire life is a lie.
Your parents are Russian spies.
KGB agents.
Sleepers, they're called.
Deep cover.
Are my parents, guys?
Are my parents, my parents?
Who am I, for God's sake?
Your moment has come.
It's been worked on here and in Russia, on and off for over eight years.
Those microphones and those cameras, fighting off anyone who tries to help him, defending America even if it means his own death, rallying a nation of television viewers into hysteria to sweep us up into the White House with powers that will make martial law seem like anarchy.
You know, this is very important.
I mean, if you ask me what I'm most scared about, I would say the Russia thing.
If you can't get behind opposing that, you are not a patriot and you are certainly not a good American.
The criminal multinational elements that have hijacked our republic are in full panic Donald J. Trump has led the American people in the first stages of restoring our republic.
Now they're launching the bizarre conspiracy theory with no proof, claiming that Trump and his legions of supporters are either Russian agents or their dukes.
While the trillion-pound elephant in the living room is the fact that Hillary Clinton publicly got illegal money from the Communist Chinese, Saudi Arabia, and scores of other nations directly to Super PACs and her campaign, not to mention her admittedly illegal foundation.
It was Hillary that got $35 million to hand over our uranium to Russia, not Donald Trump.
That's why it's imperative that President-elect Trump get on the offense now with the truth that it's Hillary, the Democrats, and the MSM that are in league with the foreign powers of globalism to bring our country down and destroy our sovereignty.
They have done in spades what they accuse Donald J. Trump of.
Clean, pure drinking water.
You can't survive without it.
But where do you get it?
Alexa Pure Pro is a brand new groundbreaking gravity-fed water filtration system that is like no other.
The Alexa Pure Pro transforms water from virtually any fresh source into clean, healthy drinking water.
Pairing the unprecedented superfiltration power of an all-new gravity block core with a hybrid chromatic shell, it removes up to 99.999% of impurities, including bacteria, viruses, fluoride, disinfectants, volatile organic contaminants, and hormones.
Filter capacity up to 5,000 gallons.
Stainless steel construction.
Easy assembly.
Low maintenance.
Replacement filters are simple to install.
And now, as part of an exclusive limited-time introductory offer, you can save $20 off the retail price and get free shipping.
This is a limited-time offer, so order your unit today and receive free shipping and $20 off.