All Episodes
May 25, 2001 - Alex Jones Show
21:49
20010525_Noam_Chomsky_Alex
Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
08:16
n
noam chomsky
09:49
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Mainstream media.
Government cover-ups.
You want answers?
Well, so does he.
He's Alex Jones on the GCN Radio Network.
And now, live from Austin, Texas, Alex Jones.
alex jones
Welcome back, my friends, to the second hour of the broadcast.
We're going to be joined by, you know, Chomsky coming up here in just a couple minutes.
He is an institute professor.
Linguistics and Semantical Syntax and Philosophy of Language at MIT in Massachusetts.
And he's written books like Manufacturing Consent, an excellent video, also titled Manufacturing Consent.
And it goes into how they stage things.
How they will have a supposed debate on television, but the people debating are actually on the same side.
They're just debating the exact implementation.
By just a few degrees giving you the psychological illusion that there's really some type of difference so that in your mind you're going to fall in supposedly either phony camp being steered in the direction they wish.
Now that's how I put it.
Chomsky does it in a little bit more sophisticated fashion.
But they do this all the time.
Just every level of propaganda you can imagine.
He also gets into what the editors do.
And this also fits into the whole moral relativism debate because what does is is mean with Bill Clinton?
It's simply a way to neutralize any type of dissent.
And it's working wonders upon the minds of the American people.
It's like Republican, Democrat, Liberal, Conservative.
Liberals, Conservatives, you look at what they do at the top, they're all the same people.
The political left has secret police that wear black uniforms and ski masks.
The political right has police that wear black uniforms and ski masks around the world.
Centralized government, and they tell you to be in the middle of that system?
More semantical deceptions.
corralling thoughts and ideas.
Giving you phony decisions, phony tips.
That, my friends, is the essence of modern mind control behavioral modification.
And until you realize that the sitcoms and the cartoons have more propaganda in them than the newspaper or the nightly news, You will not even begin to scratch the surface of the level of this inculcation,
of this soaking into the propaganda state.
Every facet, every level, deluged, infested the human minds like a computer.
Garbage in, garbage out.
And they're training us with phony meanings for words.
They are conditioning us to believe in a false political paradigm and systems.
That's basically what it boils down to.
And Noam Chomsky calls it manufacturing consent.
The phony choice between the Republicans and the Democrats.
This huge globalist corporate state that claims that it's capitalist.
How is it capitalist to use huge government international bureaucracies to go after your competition?
To take in massive sums of corporate welfare.
And then to be able to twist the debate into a fight over aren't we going to take care of the poor?
And that really has nothing to do with it.
That's semantical deception, ladies and gentlemen.
Joining us is Professor Noam Chomsky from MIT.
Professor, it's a real honor to have you on the show.
noam chomsky
Glad to be with you.
alex jones
You bet.
Tell us a little bit about yourself and about the studies you've done and some of the books you've...
Well, I have two parallel and separate lives.
noam chomsky
One of them is what they pay me to do at MIT, that linguistics.
The others, what they would probably pay me not to do, that's being involved in a whole variety of social and political issues, international affairs, the international economy.
The foreign policy problems, just about anything you can think of that's in the front pages of the newspapers.
And one part of that which has interested me for many years is this kind of analysis of ideological institutions that includes the intellectual culture, but specifically the media, which I spend a lot of time on.
So it's that collection of topics.
What kind of system do we live in?
alex jones
That requires an essay.
Well, I would call it almost a matrix-like system where 98% of people don't even know the real parameters of power that surround them.
Phony paradigms and systems of phony left-right with all the roads leading towards a centralized, highly controlled corporate bureaucracy.
noam chomsky
I agree with that.
But I think the only thing I would add is a kind of a footnote.
...is that that marginalization of the public that you're describing is quite purposeful and conscious, self-conscious.
So, especially through the 20...
Actually, it goes back to the founding of the country, but it's particularly in the 20th century.
There has been a very self-conscious, explicit effort.
I mean, you don't have to make it up.
Nothing speculative, but the leaders say so.
Business leaders, intellectuals, academic, social scientists, and others say...
That it is important to keep the public out of things.
It's important to ensure that the public remain what are called spectators, not participants.
They are supposed to be directed to other concerns and not interfere with policy formation.
That is a major phenomenon developed in the more democratic countries, in the United States and England particularly, through the...
And the reason was very clear.
By the early 20th century, it was becoming very difficult to control people by other means.
The voting franchise was extending.
Labor unions were developing.
Women were demanding the vote.
I mean, the countries, especially England and the United States, were simply becoming more democratic.
And it was recognized early on that if you can't control people by force or,
know, poverty or some other means, you are going to have to control them by what was quite openly called propaganda at the time.
People don't like the term propaganda anymore, but that was used.
I mean, that's where the U.S. public relations industry was.
alex jones
So Professor Chomsky, they developed, put out their papers that I've read.
From the Carnegie Endowment and others that mind control, behavioral modification is much cheaper and much more effective than tanks and guns.
noam chomsky
And it's the only thing you can do because in the more democratic countries you can't control people with tanks and guns.
I mean, maybe to some limited extent, but not very much.
There's too much freedom.
It was understood very well and it is kind of striking that it's in the two main democratic countries, England and the United States.
It was realized in parallel about the same time that you're going to have to control people by what was called regimenting the public mind by ideological control.
That's where the term manufacturing consent comes from.
alex jones
Well, take Bush and Clinton.
They have the exact same policies on land grabbing, selling out sovereignty, deindustrialization, drugging the children.
But you ask the average person, they have this...
Well, I...
noam chomsky
Maybe I'm naive, but I have more faith in the public than that.
My feeling is that the general public is rather well aware of this, and I think it shows up in...
There are...
You know, there's a lot of public opinion study in the United States, mainly because business...
It wants to keep its finger on the public pulse.
They want to know what people are thinking.
So we have a pretty trustworthy and very extensive polling industry.
And what comes out of public attitudes, I think, is kind of revealing.
So for the last 20 years or so, about 80% of the population, when they're asked, what do you think the country, you know, who runs the government or what does it do, the answer that they pick out of a set of choices is...
The government works for the few and the special interests, not the people.
And in fact, in the last election, just last November, there's a big project at Harvard University called the Vanishing Voter Project where they study attitudes towards elections and so on.
Right before the election, so this has nothing to do with shenanigans in Florida, but before the election, about 75% of the population felt that there was no election.
going on in any sense that involved them.
What was happening was some kind of game involving rich contributors, party bosses, the public relations industry, which crafts the candidates to say for
particular things and have particular gestures, which you can't believe what they say.
This was a large majority of the population.
alex jones
And they wouldn't even let Ralph Nader end of the debate when he had a ticket.
noam chomsky
They wouldn't.
And there was a huge attack against him, mainly from the kind of more liberal press.
Because he was regarded as disrupting the system of, you know, basically two factions of one party.
I mean, the two factions are different.
I don't say that Democrats and Republicans are identical.
But they share fundamental interests, and those are the interests of their corporate backers.
Not very surprising, if it was otherwise.
The one thing where I'm not convinced by what you say is that I think the public is largely aware of it.
alex jones
Oh no, sir, I agree with you.
I know they're cynical, they know something's wrong, they smell the dead body under the floor, but they can't...
noam chomsky
I don't know what to do.
In fact, that's an important point, and I think you're right about that.
One of the things that is measured in these studies is what's called hopelessness.
Helplessness, sorry, helplessness.
Like, do you feel there's nothing you can do about it?
That figure has been going up, and it's reached its...
Historical peak last November.
alex jones
Professor Chomsky, we've got to break.
Coming up the next segment, I really appreciate you joining us because I'm obsessed with this stuff.
It seems to be the only game in town.
We really want to fight this.
I want to talk about their modes of control, examples of propaganda, how they split people's minds and corral the information they receive when we return with Noam Chomsky from MIT.
unidentified
More than 700 chemicals have been found in our drinking water, and did you know that you can have greater exposure to these chemicals by taking hot showers than when you drink the water?
That's because many chemicals are inhaled when they evaporate, and others are absorbed through the skin.
The KDF shower filter is designed to reduce chlorine, lead, mercury, and iron, and it inhibits the growth of bacteria, mold, algae, and fungus in your shower.
The media is non-toxic, environmentally sound, and is recyclable.
The KDF shower filter will typically last 10,000 gallons or one year, whichever comes first.
Hospitals, restaurants, and water treatment facilities use this media to reduce chlorine, iron, heavy metals, and bacteria.
What about you?
Order your KDF shower filter, normally $49, for our special price of only $35, a $14 savings.
Call now to order at 1-888-803-4438.
Order today and save $14 by calling 1- 888-803-4438 Hey America, Alex Jones here.
alex jones
You can forget the Blair Witch Project and eyes wide shut.
My documentary film, Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove, is for real.
For over 127 years in a secluded redwood grove deep in Northern California, world leaders making up an elite society known as the Bohemian Club have revived the ancient Canaanite cult of Moli.
Rumors have always swirled around this sinister enclave.
Dozens of major media institutions have failed to get hard video evidence out of the 2,700 acre cult compound.
Now I am excited to announce that we have successfully blown Bohemian Grove wide open with our hidden cameras.
Learn about the membership and the history of the Grove.
Witness the fiery cremation of care ceremony.
Priests in red and black robes conjuring demons.
Abound human sacrifice.
If you see one film this year, get Dark Secrets.
Call toll free at 888-253-3139.
That's 888-2533.
This is something world leaders don't want you to see.
Order now at 888-253-3139 or go to my website A sick population is easy to push around.
unidentified
That's why crucial information, critical information, powerful information is being kept from you.
The government's own top scientists know about stopping infection and disease.
The fact is, you could be making the safest and most powerful medicine on Earth virtually for the price of water.
But you're not supposed to know that.
Call our toll-free number today and receive important information with medical science references and detailed instructions that show you everything you need to know.
It might save your life.
Imagine having a hospital that fits in your shirt pocket.
Call 888-505-6005 or go to silversolutions.com on the Internet.
Silver Solutions is here to help to bring you the information you need, the information that may save your life.
Call today at 888-505-6005.
It's a hospital that fits in your shirt pocket.
On the average, Americans work between 45 to 50 years hoping to build up enough wealth to retire and live out their golden years.
Unfortunately, with taxation, the rising cost of food, energy, housing, and medical, many retirees are forced to live below the poverty line.
Is this a flaw of free enterprise, or is our monetary unit we call the Federal Reserve Note forcing us into perpetual debt, ensuring inflation and higher taxes?
These questions and more can be answered by reading G. Edward Griffin's book, The Creature from Jekyll Island.
Congressman Ron Paul states it's what every American needs to know about central bank power.
Hi, this is Ted Anderson.
I will give a silver dollar from the early 1900s to anyone who purchases this book.
Call 1-800-686-2237 and order a copy today.
It's critical that the public be made aware of the system.
Call and order your copy today at 1-800-686-2237.
That's 1-800-686-2237.
The Genesis Communications Radio Network proudly presents The Alex Jones Show.
Because there's a war on for your mind.
alex jones
That's right.
That's my motto.
That's my slogan.
Up on InfoWars.com, my premier website, from Reuters, yesterday invited his speakers, Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, were groomed at the Bilderberg meeting before rising to fame as U.S. President and British Prime Minister.
respectively. They go on to brag about how they run our country.
I was a kook three years ago to talk about this huge corporate elite, and now they're throwing it in our face.
Is that, Professor Chomsky, part of the hopelessness that they're trying to instill in us?
I've seen a shift in the propaganda in the last three years from denying all of this to throwing it in our face.
noam chomsky
Could be, but I think...
My own feeling is the roots go back farther.
If you go back again to the early part of the 1920s, approximately, that's when this stuff really takes off.
alex jones
Madison Avenue?
noam chomsky
Yeah, that's when the public relations industry really exploded.
And it grew on the basis of the very sensible assumption that was pretty clearly articulated that we have to somehow make sure that the general public does not make use of the...
Democratic opportunities that are available to them and leaves us to run the place as we've been doing.
And the way to do it was, you read the business leaders are saying, look, we have to induce what's called a philosophy of futility.
They actually use the phrase.
We have to kind of direct people to superficial things like fashionable consumption.
Football. Yeah, something.
Anything that doesn't bother us.
alex jones
Bread and circus.
noam chomsky
Yeah, just anything like that.
I mean, that's true of leading intellectuals.
I mean, take, say, Walter Lippmann, who is the leading figure in the U.S. elite media in the 20th century, major public intellectual.
He's the one who invented the phrase manufacturer of consent.
We borrowed it from him.
And he thought it was necessary.
It's necessary to manufacture consent in order to make sure that we, what he called the responsible men, can run the affairs of the world without being bothered.
And what he didn't say, but what is crucial is your point, that people, you become a responsible man if you're serving the interests of concentrated private power.
alex jones
Professor Chomsky?
During the break we were talking about, I just observed this, they will have somebody on TV, both sides are taking private property under the guise of environmentalism, and they're both really on the same side, but they act like this is the two choices, that there's an actual debate going on when it's not controlling the entire system of thought.
What do you call that?
noam chomsky
Well, I think a sensible, like if you and I were to sit down and invent a system, an effective system of propaganda, we wouldn't.
Have a unique party line, you know, coming from the Kremlin or something, which everybody could detect and nobody would believe.
Like in the Soviet Union, nobody believed the propaganda because the force was so plain and the source was so obvious that they didn't believe it.
The intelligent way to design a propaganda system is to present the illusion of debate, but within a fixed framework that you're not allowed to escape.
So you start with certain assumptions.
Everyone has to accept those assumptions or they're not admitted into the discussion.
Once you accept those assumptions, you want to stimulate the most lively and intense debate and controversy, but ensuring that those assumptions are maintained.
Anybody questions those assumptions, they're just not part of the discussion.
alex jones
So we feel like we're part of the decision-making process when we're actually just cheerleading for what the elite want to report.
noam chomsky
Yeah, we're choosing among...
Things that concentrated power really doesn't care that much about.
You see this very clearly.
Take, say, one of the major issues for the public.
Look at polls, and it's understandable.
Are these international economic agreements, the things that are called free trade agreements.
That's not what they are.
Those are very big issues for the public.
People are very much worried about the trade deficit, because they know that affects their jobs.
alex jones
China has a 40% tariff on us.
We have a 2% on them.
They call that free trade.
You're not an isolationist, are you?
noam chomsky
No, I'm not.
alex jones
No, but that's what they say.
noam chomsky
Of course.
The point I'm trying to make is this.
These are very big issues for the population.
They're also big issues for the business world.
But the population and the business world happens to be on opposite sides.
Therefore, the issues do not arise in political campaigns.
So, like, for example, the free trade area of the Americas, which is an enormous agreement with a lot of consequences, that has yet to be discussed in the media.
It's been negotiated for three years.
It finally broke through at the helmet of the Americas meeting in Quebec.
There was such a furor over it.
It had to be mentioned.
But it's been under negotiation for a couple of years by corporate...
Managers by trade ministers of governments who are basically corporate representatives.
The media know all about it, but they don't want the public to know.
It did not come up in the political campaign.
The nature of these arrangements has yet to be made public.
I mean, you can sort of figure it out by either a research project, but these things are not made available to the public, and it's for a very clear reason.
alex jones
Our final segment with the professor with solutions coming up.
unidentified
This is GCN.
Export Selection