Alex Jones and Steve Lane dissect the Federal Reserve's alleged money creation, Texas ITS camera surveillance, and national ID fears. They challenge mainstream narratives on China's labor camps and question TxDOT officials about "smart highway" ticketing potential. Citing Time magazine, they warn of subdermal chips and technocratic control while promoting independent media to expose government corruption and military-industrial overreach. Ultimately, the segment frames these technologies as tools for population control rather than public safety. [Automatically generated summary]
The newspaper that I've seen that's done any balance reporting is the Dallas Morning News, and we'll show you some shots of that and read some excerpts and just talk about it.
And then later tonight, I also want to thank some of the people that have really been doing some good.
This is a little pamphlet put together by Jason Hatfield, a personal friend of mine.
Jason just got out of high school.
He's 18 years old.
I accidentally stepped on this.
I was carrying it into the building and accidentally stepped on it.
It's a little bit wrinkled, but we'll...
I'll show that to you later.
And it's very simple.
You ask what you can do.
Well, he got the facts, the information.
And in just about four or five paragraphs, or six or seven paragraphs, and a few quotes, he spells out and puts you on the track to find out how you're being manipulated.
So it's very, very important that people out there get involved.
So we'll read some excerpts from this later tonight.
Of course, my co-host Steve Lane is here.
And starting next week, I will no longer be here except for tape, a piece of the little player in the program.
That might help with the background noise or anything else that's going on.
And of course, we're going to play a clip that you did a few months ago of Margo Frazier, the sheriff, Steve, admitting that trying to whitewash it and say the helicopters are to save people.
Yes, they're law enforcement.
Yes, they're going to be called Starflight.
And we're going to put that together with about a 22-minute piece that has Mr. Hurt from the Texas Department of Transportation at first saying that the cameras aren't going to be used to give you tickets, but later saying, well, yes, we do plan to use them for tickets.
We are testing it out for tickets.
So that's coming up.
It'll be an education for you.
unidentified
I've been wanting to see that.
Yeah, it's kind of long, but, again, this is education.
But there's a lot going on, a lot of things happening.
Now, why don't you tell us about the national ID card a little bit?
unidentified
Okay.
There's a website that somebody emailed me about, and I think it's an excellent website.
A lot of websites that are news-oriented websites basically...
You can't steal information from other newspapers and just kind of reprint it without their permission, but this is actually a far more professional website.
They get their information with permission, and there's an article in here about the national ID card, and what's basically happened here is in 1996, the Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, and contained within that act is guidelines for what basically will turn out to be a national ID card, and that is...
Federal agencies will no longer accept as identification state-issued driver's licenses or ID cards that don't contain certain information.
We know the thumb scanning to buy and sell is coming.
They're running commercials on Visa about it.
The banks are putting in the computer systems.
All they have to do is plug in the actual scanners.
They're getting us to practice doing it with ink when you go to a bank.
The point is, why should we fear this?
What's the main problem?
unidentified
My biggest problem with it is now truly, truly, you will just be a number, not a name.
You will become more and more the sheep-like analogy that we use.
I talk about the fact with the year 2000 stuff, if we get...
In lieu of cash, if we start getting issued cards to use for money from the Federal Reserve as opposed to private banks, then if you're a so-called dissident or if you're deemed not to have paid all your taxes, they're just going to turn your money card off, so to speak, your Federal Reserve-issued money card.
Well, that's absolutely true, Steve, but let's go right to the heart of the matter.
This is how it'll affect us here locally, but why is the establishment pushing this, in your opinion?
unidentified
In my opinion, oh, I can tell you exactly why, because it's right here in this document.
Among other things, you're not going to be able to get firearms, get a job, board a plane, vote, cash a check, open a bank or investment account, purchase insurance, receive federal benefits, obtain a student loan, basically nothing.
They're going to be able to track your every move.
I mean, invasion of privacy is an old, outdated mode.
We should be more like Germany, who is just...
Legalized total wiretapping, cameras in the homes, hidden devices except for politicians, lobbyists and psychiatrists that run Germany.
Now, let me go past that.
Of course they want to control populations inside the three power blocks that we have in the world.
Asia, pretty much controlled by the IMF, which is controlled by Europe and the US power block, and they're all pretty much connected.
Then you have some subgroups inside the world empire that's forming.
That's a military-industrial complex that just 30 years ago was probably just as powerful as the banking establishment, even though they're interlocked.
They're like Siamese twins.
They're interconnected, but they still have the same thing.
The main thing they're worried about is offshore corporations.
They've been using this for a long time for themselves.
They lobby politicians to levy taxes on you.
Then they go offshore, pay none of the taxes.
Well, why do they want taxes on you, the middle class?
Because they're lobbying the politicians to take your money from taxes, give it to them in government contracts, kickbacks, and corrupt banking practices.
Now, why do they want a new world order?
Why do they need world control, world financial system, IMF, World Bank, the World Trade Organization?
Why do they need all these international bodies, the United Nations as a military arm?
What?
They're all interconnected.
Who do they go back to?
The big financiers that make their money out of corruption and control of governments.
Money is leaving the country.
Middle class people are using the tricks that they've been using for a long time.
People are creating offshore corporations.
They are incorporating in the Virgin Islands, or they are incorporating in Spain or in Switzerland, or they are incorporating in British Honduras.
What is now Belize, changed, and the British have now lost that possession.
That's what we're talking about.
So see, used to, Steve, whereas you could have money leave the U.S. and go to Europe, and money leave Europe and go to the U.S., money leave the U.S. and Europe and go to Asia, and money from U.S. go to Japan, and money from Japan go to U.S., and people hiding their money from their central governments, the bankers...
We've paid off the politicians strategically over the last hundred years, and all our elections were fought over this in the past.
So the banks have figured out how to strategically, come in strategically, buy up the media, buy up the politicians, buy up the regulators of the countries.
And then control the whole system, meanwhile putting out the propaganda through the media that all the little corporations are really part of the establishment, so they don't band together and kick the ass of these banks while they're consolidating.
Then they use regulators to sneak in, run over small corporations and medium-sized and even large corporations, Bill Gates and others.
And now Intel.
And of course they had a minor victory, but believe me, Justice will be back.
But that's what we're talking about.
So it's to control the free flow of money.
They don't want money flowing out.
They can't stand that.
They are threatened by new money.
They're threatened by new power structures developing because new power structures do develop.
So it's a long-term strategic goal.
I think they're going to fail in the end, but there's a lot of money to be made.
The scary part is the military industrial complex is making a lot of money out of scaring governments and selling them armaments and technologies to control populations.
As our populations get more mentally ill because of the conditioning in our media, as we have more strange behavior, as our populations are dumbed down more, we are going to have more antisocial behavior.
So they're expanding in all the big army war symposiums, army war collar symposiums that are training with local police, are teaching on this, they're learning military terminology.
And so they're making a lot of money off that, and they're selling that.
They're selling slavery.
And that fits right in with what the big banks want because they need control of populations.
They don't need tax revolts.
They don't care what it does to the world economy.
They're in the control, Steve.
And that's my little speech.
unidentified
No, it's absolutely outstanding.
This is one of the reasons I like participating in this show because...
So often times I can come down here and get an education and learn things.
Well, it's not that I'm some genius, it's just the way the world works.
unidentified
No, no, it's the way it really does work.
And one of the things I think is interesting that kind of ties right into this, I heard somebody say this, I think it was on Keith Perry's radio station the other day, was that these elite that you're speaking of that wish to do this control, they have more in common with other elite.
They don't think in terms of nationalism.
They don't believe in America, or they don't believe in China, or they don't believe in Russia.
They believe in this elitism.
That's their little...
That's their little clique.
That's their little group.
And they have more in common with each other than they do any sort of national...
And they fund university professors and heads of media.
And then push government people that will create larger centralized governments.
Why would they want that?
Why would the rich, the ultra-rich, want a centralized government?
Well, it's the same reason every king and thug and dictator in history have, because they have to have that apparatus of control, that lever to access the nation, that lever to control populations.
And now they're moving from armaments, even though they're gearing up with that also.
They're moving from armaments, but their favorite thing, what is most successful, is subduing populations through propaganda.
And the people out there that really can't understand this or can't deal with this, I get more and more serious every day, and this stuff is a real burden.
I don't like knowing about this, I don't appreciate knowing about this, but I'm telling you something.
People of means out there, you can't just toss this off as, well, this is AXS TV or whatever.
I mean...
I'm a mainstream FM radio host here in town with KJFK. There are people like Carl Wigglesworth in San Antonio.
There are people like Tony Brown on the National Television Show.
There are congressmen like Ron Paul.
There are people like Senator Henry B. Gonzalez.
There are so many people that have stood up.
Eisenhower warned you about the military-industrial complex when he left office in 1960. I mean, I'm not going to sit here and argue with you anymore.
This is the real deal.
This is full bore.
You're being lied to.
The Federal Reserve is not your friend, despite all the media propaganda and the peer pressure.
They're screwing us.
This debt, this $5 trillion, $600 billion debt, and to service it is over $24 trillion, and at our other debt, it's around $30 trillion.
This $30 trillion debt is directly caused by that because what Atfield wrote in here is absolutely true.
One of my friends, 18 years old, he just went to the actual Federal Register and all the documents that got it for you, all the information we brought out here 100 times.
The Fed works through a system called fractional reserve banking.
This is how it works.
The central bank tells the U.S. Treasury to print up $1 billion.
This costs the Fed only 2.3 cents per note, but after the Treasury and everything, it's really about 20 cents.
But that's how much it costs to print the note, but after shipping and everything else.
2.3 cents per note, no matter what the denomination is.
That's a dollar bill or a thousand dollar bill.
The central bank then loans it out to the 12 regional banks at 3% interest rate, discount rate.
The 12 regional banks lent it to the commercial bank of...
America, Northwest, etc., at 7% interest rate, prime rate.
When these 12 regional banks lend out the money, they then have borrowed from the central bank.
They add on $6 billion.
By this, I mean they turn $1 billion into $7 billion from nothing.
It has no reserves.
And it just goes on and on.
unidentified
In other words, it's not backed up by gold or silver or anything like that when they say it has no reserves.
Instead of barter, where I come up and say, I want to say this pig for that cow.
What is this pig?
I want six pigs and four chickens for that cow.
It's to make things smoother.
It's to grease the skids of commerce, not a smoke and mirrors magician game where the government allows private banks to control the printing and issuing of money.
If I had a money machine, I could take over the dingham town.
If the government would let me print money, I could take over Austin in a couple years.
If I could print, Thousand dollar bills, and people have...
Alex Jones is allowed, but Alex Jones is a private citizen.
What the hell is Alex Jones doing printing money?
Well, actually, Alex Jones gets it printed by a government bureaucrat, but then the bureaucrat gives him the money, and then I loan it back to the bureaucrat.
Is it that sick?
unidentified
And this has been going on since 1933, is that correct?
But anyways, I say a lot of the same stuff, because the answer's the same today and tomorrow.
unidentified
No, I think it's important to know, too, just to use a little common sense.
Imagine if you could have a money machine.
Starting back in 1913, imagine the kind of control you could have, and you can imagine the kind of control these elites have that you're sitting here talking about.
I mean, it doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
If you had a money machine in operation since 1913, and that was the goal of the money machine, you would control a tremendous amount, and that's actually what's going on today.
It's all these sweet little, you know, leave it to beaver images.
Meanwhile, we're over there really...
Setting it up so Europe can't get in there, so we fully dominate China, and we get all the little slave goods.
And I'm sorry.
Then dammit, we shouldn't have gone to war with Hitler.
We should not have gone to war with Hitler.
I should have a Jewish lampshade putting off a nice rosy glow.
Well, no, that makes you want to vomit.
But we can say we're pragmatic now because professors all around the country have put out this poison doctrine that there is no right and wrong, there is no set agenda, there's only pragmatism.
And I just want to knock their teeth out.
unidentified
But, you know, to me, I make a distinction between engaging a potential enemy and letting them come in your bed, sleep in your bed, use your shower, and mess around with your wife, which in my mind is what Clinton has done with the Chinese government.
I mean, for three years, I've been talking about the missile transfers to China.
I had the damn documents in front of me.
I had the Air Force generals on my radio program.
I had the congressmen.
I had the FBI people that have gotten out because of this.
Letting spies into our computers, giving them missile technology, and then the media tells you it's satellite.
Bull, it was the Long March rocket, an intercontinental ballistic missile that they gave MIRV technology to.
Give me a break, Laurel, and then we've also got Hughes Space and Aeronautics.
But the important thing is, is people are going to argue on a pragmatic basis that we have to trade with China, we have to do this because it will hurt our economy.
Well, number one, we have a $50 billion trade deficit with them.
It gets bigger and bigger.
The multinational corporations are the ones making the profits.
We're being de-industrialized.
But let's go past that.
Why do the UN and Kyoto want to restrict our fossil fuels but allow China to have no restrictions?
That's an even bigger incentive to industrialize us.
You want more?
They have absolutely no environmental protection.
They have zero in that damn place.
What do you want from me?
I'm trying to give you the facts here.
But let's go further.
You say we're still getting a great deal out of China.
Okay, let's go right down to the wire with this.
If you want to see...
Yeah, there's Long Beach that the Chinese have moved into.
I'm right outside the base there.
It's a gigantic complex.
But to sit there, and there's a commie cruiser in the bay, to sit there and to deal with this is just absolutely sickening.
And I am not going to sit here and stand for it anymore.
But if you want to be pragmatic all day, that's fine.
You want to know how we deal with China?
If Europe or Japan or anybody else trades with them, if they don't stop this, what they're doing with their human rights, there's Costco truck shipping and slave goods to put Americans out of business, but to...
If you can't stand up for your country, and there's a Georgia Air Force Base where they're moving in, I'm watching the TV and not speaking on Target, but the point I'm trying to make is this.
We go to all the people in the world, and you say, you know what?
We'll be isolationists.
We know that didn't cause the 29 crash.
It was the big banks calling in the short-term loans to stock traders, and then restricting the money supply for six or seven years.
Until we were on our knees and we accept semi-socialism and now the degrees have increased.
But if you sit there and you accept this BS, we've got to stand up like we stood up against Hitler.
We can't have a nuclear war with China.
I don't want to have a nuclear war with China.
We've got to have an economic, full-scale war with China while we still can.
And anybody that trades with them, we isolate them.
And we've still got the power now that if we do it hard enough...
You know, what's up with South Africa?
It was wrong that whites ran South Africa and that some blacks got imprisoned and killed?
You bet it was, and we try to do something about that.
But that was all a big posing deal anyways.
But with China, there are a billion and a quarter of people, 30 million in slave labor camps with a huge attrition rate yearly, and you sit there and say that we can't do anything about it.
I mean, we're just a nation of scum.
We're a nation of filth.
I do not buy Chinese goods.
I have a pair of...
Nike flip-flops that I bought like five years ago, and I should throw those away, but I'm attached to them, or actually they're sandals.
But I'll never buy anything made in China if I can help it.
And you shouldn't either.
You should spend time to look on the label and at the same time support American jobs.
unidentified
And ultimately what you're doing when you buy these products is you're supporting a Chinese military.
The Chinese, it's been documented, they have grown their military at a rate that's alarming to the rest of the world.
Well, that's a 1994 census is around a billion and a quarter.
It's probably almost a billion and a half.
I mean, it's a...
But look, I'm not going to sit here and argue with people.
Now, we're fixing to go.
There's something we've got to plug.
This may be a tape program later, but for the live viewers right now, July 4th at noon, at 12 noon, south side of the Capitol building.
Everybody's going to be out there, myself, Steve, Rusty, Jeff Davis, that was his idea, Greg Erickson, probably Don Bennett, just a whole bunch of people.
We're going to be there, and if you want a contact number, there is a contact number.
And again, that is 4th of July.
Come out and defend your country.
unidentified
Yes, I believe there's going to be some UN flag burning going on that day.
But still, somebody tells you, we're doing this for your best interest.
You better look past it and realize you're being conned by a snake oil salesman.
Abundant Wilderness00:03:30
unidentified
You know, I can't speak to other countries, but you've traveled around this country.
I've been in every state but two.
This country, at least, is abundant.
It is rich with life.
It's teeming with just wilderness and uncivilized areas.
I don't know what the percentages are, but I can tell you, take an east-to-west drive across Montana, and I'm here to tell you, there's a whole lot of nothing.
And for people to think that there's not enough to go around for everyone, it's just ridiculous.
There are people who might go on two vacations of their life.
You know, when you're young, you might drive to the beach and get drunk, and all you see is highways.
You drive past Houston, and you go to the beach, and you get drunk, and you see cops everywhere, and running around.
That's your idea of a vacation.
Or there's families that go to the Grand Canyon in the middle of the summer, and they're lazy and out of shape, and there might be a little bit of traffic, even though I've been there many times during Pica.
It's not a problem.
And, you know, but they might have to stand in line when they go to one of the restaurants or whatever.
Now, to them, that's crowded.
That's their idea.
They go directly on highways or they fly to a park, see it crowded.
Oh my gosh.
I've driven all over the damn country.
And I mean from Texas to Oklahoma to all...
Even driving to New York.
I've driven to Boston, New York, and Washington, D.C. You'll see giant areas of woods when you're doing that.
We went, well, my last trip for American Story by Design, we went to Texas, we're fixing to go to your calls, through West Texas, we went through New Mexico,
Arizona, Southern California, back into Northern Arizona, back through Central California, through Northern California, through Oregon, through Washington State, through Idaho, through Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and then back down to the...
unidentified
Which comes to my point.
There are stretches of Montana, and I can speak to this, that in the middle of the day, you can literally drive for 50 or 60 miles without seeing another human being.
Well, I had the New York Times two weeks ago, and they were talking about how in New York they're buying up all this wilderness land.
There's damn land everywhere.
unidentified
But, you know, that's hard for a lot of Austin citizens to understand, I think, because of this.
We have a city council that definitely has tried to put us all in a little box within a certain boundary, and they want everybody to live downtown where they can control the tax money instead of what they like to call urban sprawl.
People like to have land.
They like to have grass to cut and flowers to plant, but that's not the way the people that run this city want it.
They want you downtown in a high-rise, paying taxes to the city so they can have more money because they think they're part of the establishment.
They think they're actually elite when really they're just little dudes.
I mean, I would go do it if somebody wanted me to.
But really, I'm just...
I just want to get information out.
And sure, it'd be good to go on one of those deals and say, here's my documentary or here's my book.
But at the same time, I'm just trying to get better at what I do.
Tell you the truth, I get up here, I talk too fast, I put out too much information.
I should elaborate more and really explain things probably in a more cognizant manner.
unidentified
Well, do you think you'd feel more comfortable, like Steve, such as yourself, would you feel comfortable if I could get a hold of somebody like Tony Brown and set something up on a national program, Sir, I'll do that in a...
The only point I'm making to you is that maybe I should focus on trying to promote myself like that.
But a lot of things are happening.
I'm getting a lot of calls, a lot of other things.
It seems like when things start happening, things really start happening fast.
But again, I don't have any delusions of grandeur.
unidentified
I'm just one small little part of the fight.
I was going to say one of the reasons I've always liked Alex and what Alex does is I've always been impressed by the fact that Alex always promotes ideas and thoughts and information and actually I have seen you in situations where Shy away is not the word from self-promotion.
I know there's many people that have tried to paint you into that corner as being a self-promoter.
I have found from personal experience from knowing him, the last thing Alex does is self-promoting.
Well, sometimes you have to promote yourself some.
unidentified
Have you ever heard that saying, you know, keep your friends closer, but your enemies closer?
I know, Alex, especially you, man, you definitely hate mainstream media.
But do you think it would benefit the American citizen to have people such as yourself and Steve Wang, probably Jeff, on like say Tony Brown's journal promoting these ideas?
No, let me answer that.
I think it certainly helps.
I think it's better when you get a person that's more visible in the mainstream, like a Tony Brown, to come out with the same information that's been on...
If you hear it on access television, you hear an Alex Jones say it, you hear Jeff Davis say it, I mean, it's important and it's valid, and especially when it can all be documented, is Alex always, always does.
When I got home from yesterday's Texas Best Seminars, I opened the American Statement, and inside, I don't know if you all saw it, but they had, out in Russia, their form of IRS agents with ski masks on.
All right, so maybe one of your calls, you call the next, can verify this and tell you exactly what page.
But in the statement, it showed, like, the Russian version of IRS agents going off the season, you know.
I was going to say, what I would say about that is, I don't know what you mean by Russian form, that sounds like our form.
In fact, if anything, they'd be copying us, is what it sounds like.
Yeah, well, I mean, because y'all did say that.
They were over here training, doing bivouac, you know, and you had the armaments, like the tanks, the helicopters over here, plus they had Russian personnel doing some training and bivouac, and, you know, so it all ties together.
I know that sounds kooky, but I played Congressman Rohrabacher.
Two weeks ago, saying, yeah, Chinese troops, Russian troops, training.
Clinton says UN troops are coming in to fight drugs.
unidentified
I played a clip of him on UN. Well, heck, 20 years ago, it had been kooky to advocate sticking a sheriff in a high school with a drug dog, and I got a kid that works with me, a nice guy, just graduated high school, and he said, well, what's the big deal?
They have a barcode on them, and they figure out about a criminal.
And the kids are being taught that police are here, and that's what they're doing.
unidentified
I want to make this very valid point.
Last time we went down and spoke about ASAP at Commissioner's Court, the Sheriff's Department was down asking for a federal government handout from the Department of Justice to put a couple of sheriffs in a couple of high schools.
Now, what's disturbing about this is this, okay?
These children are going to one day be adults.
If we get children used to the idea of having a policeman everywhere, of just doing random searches of their lockers, of doing random searches of their cars in the parking lot, what kind of adults are they going to make?
When they grow up and be an adult, what happens when a sheriff says up and says, you know what, drugs are now so bad, we're just going to send a police officer, we're going to start doing door-to-door searches for drugs and guns, and these adults that were once high school kids that were used to this, that thought it was no big deal, are going to go, eh.
I've been telling everybody that those are what they plan to put cameras on because in other cities I've seen poles just like that with a question mark wire, a lightning rod with cameras.
We're fixing to go over and find out right now.
Sir, what's your position, Mr. Hurt, here at the Department of Transportation?
It uses an array of changeable message signboards, along with closed-circuit television cameras, sensors that are built into the road.
All of which are monitored at a remote location to give traffic management people a clear picture of what's going on in the city as a whole at any given moment.
So it's actually better than helicopters because you can just punch a button and see any area you wish.
unidentified
Right.
They actually monitor this at a traffic management center that looks very much like mission control at NASA where they've got banks of people sitting behind computer terminals but they also have a large display in the front of the room.
I'm not sure in the entire system of every eighth of a mile, but in the locations where they're particularly congested, where you have problems.
The mixed masters.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
When we start out here, we'll have some online, at least a couple by August of this year, down around the upper-lower level split, and we'll just monitor them here at our district office.
What we ultimately hope to do is build a traffic management center in a couple of years.
Where we'll be there, the police department will be there, fire department, EMS, the capital metro.
Everything is done with the best of intentions, and most of the people pushing at the low levels, like Mr. Hurt, think they're doing that.
But we need to think about our liberties.
Can this government be trusted?
Can the IRS be trusted with these tools?
Can they be trusted with national ID cards, thumb scanning?
It just goes on and on.
Now, the important point for everybody to note here is the contradiction.
Mr. Hurt says that they're not planning to watch people drive around town.
This is all for EMS, all for fire, all for police.
Just like with Starflight here locally, for surveillance, they got you to pass the Travis County bond package under the guise of Starflight, but then the sheriff, on tape, And many others admit that they're going to be using these two new helicopters for surveillance.
Now, he says that they're not going to use it for that, and then later contradicts himself.
It's called doublespeak.
What are those cameras?
unidentified
We've done some testing of different types of cameras, seeing which ones we like the best.
You were saying, Mr. Hurt, that this is mainly just for emergencies and clearing up traffic and directing people around traffic, which sounds great.
But I would say that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I think we need cameras, but the problem is I don't trust our federal government, and I think any systems we put in, they can easily step in and Well, this is not a law enforcement tool.
unidentified
It's not something I think that law enforcement would be disappointed if they actually, and they will be, part of the...
I mean, if they look at the camera and see the picture, it's not like they're going to see your face.
It's really more of a broad view of an entire stretch of a highway.
Some of these cameras in San Antonio and Houston do have zoom capability, don't they?
unidentified
Right, and we will have some zoom capability.
We pan, pan, tilt, all of that, you know, to be able to get an entire look at a problem area.
But as far as being used to give you a ticket, that's not the purpose, and I don't see that being the purpose.
It's a traffic management tool.
And it's all part of an entire complex where we've already got sensors put in the road in parts of Interstate 35. And what it does, it tells how fast the traffic is moving.
And sends along recommendations and advisers and ideas that they want implemented.
And I just see the trend that's going on nationally of federal control.
Just to give you an example, just a month ago I went to San Antonio with Chief Ali Philippus.
We threw out the Delta Force for attempting to bribe them.
And if you think I'm kidding you, you can call down there and ask them.
The Delta Force is going to train here, and our little TV show and my radio show were able to stop them from training here.
And I know that's not your purview and your area.
I just want to communicate to y'all that that is our fear.
We'll put in these systems that are there to help the public, that are there to ensure safety.
And that law enforcement will become more and more under federal control.
You say that law enforcement, though, will be stationed at the main center that y'all plan to construct?
unidentified
Well, there'll be a representative of the police department, maybe several, and the object there is to be able to identify and dispatch, identify the type of problem they may have, and dispatch even before somebody dials 911. They'll be able to say, we've had an accident there.
What about EMS? EMS will be there.
The fire department will be there.
Capital Metro will be there.
It's going to be a joint center where all of us are there that are involved in traffic management.
They're building a $2,031,000 helicopter hangar, three acres under the roof, according to the commissioner's report and documents that I've gotten from them.
And they called it Star Flight.
This is just a microcosm of the problem I'm talking about.
They called it Star Flight, but the two new helicopters are going to be used by the sheriff's department for surveillance.
We have Margo Frazier, the sheriff.
On tape, and you'll see that tonight again, saying that yes, they're going to be for surveillance, but then it says nowhere in the document people voted for the bond package.
And I know that this is local, whereas your state, just the point I'm making is that the road to hell is paved with good intentions over and over.
They'll tell us it's for this, and then we'll say, great, we're for it.
You think it's reasonable, because that's what you believe.
Then they put in somebody else.
And they go along with what it was really set up for.
That's my only point.
unidentified
Well, again, this is going to be a state, city, capital metro type of operation.
I don't see the federal government having any type of authority to take over the center and use it for something different.
The Texas Department of Transportation is not a law enforcement agency.
We have no authority to enforce the law.
And that's not our interest.
Our interest is in making sure that the transportation system in Austin And in the state of Texas, it's safe and efficient and effective.
With Interstate 35 being a major NAFTA corridor, we're going to see more and more traffic on this road, and it's, for better or worse, it's Austin's main street.
And anything we can do to facilitate the flow of traffic, that's what we're trying to do.
And we're at an age now where we're able to use quite a bit of high technology and give the motorist a good deal of information that he or she may not have had in the past before they get into a situation.
Just three years ago, I wasn't the way I am now, but when you read The Statesman and they tell you what a good idea it is, in the May 10th veteran state, it's not a matter of when a chemical or biological attack is happening, or not.
The Statesman's exact quote was in the May 10th veteran state was, it's not a question of will it happen, but when it happens.
And the statesman also wrote that in Chicago and other cities, the Marines and Delta are practicing taking over police stations, water facilities, the communication systems.
Now, people could say, well, that's in case terrorists are taking over.
But I just want you all to know.
And this is in the media, but they're telling us how wonderful it is that secret military teams are practicing taking over communication, transportation, water, energy, and police departments mainly.
And again, I don't want to, you know, get off into some conspiracies.
This is a conspiracy.
There's a lot of stuff that people aren't paying attention to, and I just see Germany as the leader of cameras, and I see Britain as the leader of cameras, and Germany, just two months ago...
I passed the law, unanimously almost, to where they can actually bug homes and actually put cameras in homes, but politicians and psychiatrists and lobbyists are exempt.
And that's in Germany, in good old Deutschland.
And we know they're the home of Big Brother.
unidentified
Well, we're not into that.
We're not into getting into your house or getting in listening or seeing anything that goes on into your house.
At least not in 1998. Not at this point.
2005. Our dealing with the federal government has always been basically through the Federal Highway Administration, and our interest has always been design, capacity, safety.
Yeah, well, that was good news for us because we ought to get probably somewhere in the neighborhood of an additional $713 million a year in this state, which we've been giving way more money than we've been getting back.
Now, you said earlier that the cameras are mainly going to be at the main intersections and mixed masters and areas where congestion generally tends to be or where wrecks happen more often.
How many cameras do you think Austin will get over the next six years?
unidentified
Well, I think over the period of six years, it will probably number into close to 100 or so.
We'll put 183 and the new additions to 183 were built with this in mind.
That's where you'll see it first.
We've got the pull boxes where we can pull the cables already in place and we don't have to retrofit the road.
You'll see additional roadways like Ben White, possibly 71. And as the freeway facilities are expanded east of the interstate towards the airport, I'm sure you'll see it on there as well.
You talked about the over $700 million and the $2 billion numbers that Texas will be getting over the next six years as part of this new transportation bill.
Is any of that money going for cameras?
unidentified
Well, no, not at this point.
The money that was just passed by the transportation bill doesn't have any place to go right now.
I mean, it's not designated for anything.
That will be up to the Transportation Commission.
As they fund long-term projects to decide where that money is going to be spent.
Is the $700 million and the $2 billion over the next six years, is that going to help y'all free up other funds to build y'all's new command center, or what would you call it?
unidentified
Well, the traffic management center is going to be paid for jointly through the city, the county, the state, all of us that are participating in it.
The money from the transportation bill, we hope, will go more towards constructing and maintaining the infrastructure.
And that includes everything from multimodal...
Projects like bicycle trails, HOV lanes, as well as highway construction itself.
It's going to have its fingers in a lot of pies before it's all over.
But again, Texas has no plans in the future to, like California, put cameras in to ticket people.
unidentified
No, not at this point.
What happens down the road, that's a law enforcement issue, but as far as the Department of Transportation goes, that's...
That is not our plan or our function.
How do you all work with the DPS? Well, we work very closely with the DPS because it is the state law enforcement agency as far as patrolling the highways.
Once you get outside the city limits, if you have an accident or traffic control or traffic tickets or whatever, that's the responsibility of the Department of Public Safety.
It's an extremely professional organization.
We work very closely with them, and they have been of immeasurable help to us on a number of occasions.
No, well, I think that as far as that goes, it's here because we've already tested.
Like at railroad crossings.
But if we can use a device like that to keep people from running around crossing arms at a railroad crossing and save the lives of some kid that's in a car so he doesn't have any choice about that.
Save for the children like Clinton and Buddy the dog.
No, seriously.
See, yeah.
Now, they're already in Kansas and other states.
You go through and the toll is almost nothing if you have the transponder in your car.
Right.
KTAG and all the rest of this garbage.
And...
The problem is, is the lady at the toll booth was like, I love K-Tag!
I'm like, yeah, you'll love it when everybody has it, and your job's gone, lady.
And at the same point, we see more and more of these smart highways and pole systems, and it seems to me like in the future, well, it's not just the future, the April 27th issue of Time, the Future of Money, you can probably find one in there.
Read on page 44. It talks about the best part, quote, the best part is the chip.
Under your daughter's skin in the near future, you won't have to buy the drinks for her at the bar.
Now, that's on page 44. That's the type of mental illness that's in our mainstream media.
And I challenge you to go read that, and then they talk about tollways and transponders and one card for everything and chips under the skin and how wonderful it is, the best part for your daughter is, blah, blah, blah.
Of course, it's always for the children.
And you sit there and you read that, and then you realize, wait a minute, if the IRS doesn't like me now, and they're a bunch of criminals, that's been proven.
Out of control.
If they don't like me now, they can come take my house or whatever, but I can still mow yards or be in the black market economy selling shoes on the street or whatever.
Well, what if they in 10 years have implemented this smart car and smart highways?
You won't be able to get in your car, drive down the road.
Your car will just turn off if you're not a good citizen or a good slave.
unidentified
Well, that would take a great deal of technology that hadn't been invented yet to turn your car off.
All the technology does now is it uses What in effect is a high-tech metal detector to read the speed of the car as it goes over.
Well, now that's the K-Tag.
I'm talking about the sensor in the road that makes the speed.
No, I think that as far as that goes, it's here because we've already tested, like at railroad crossings.
But if we can use a device like that to keep people from running around crossing arms at a railroad crossing and save the lives of some kid that's in a car so he doesn't have any choice about that, I'm all for it.
One of the points I wanted to make was, I've seen one of the tests that he's talking about, and I don't know if it works off a radar gun system or whatever, but near Lake Travis right now.
Okay, but it's a big sign, and if you're driving it, and it tells you.
Yeah, it tells you how fast you're going, and I think that's the idea of testing it, and also, too, just to get people to slow down when they see how fast they're going, but I'm sure that's part of the test that he was talking about, so I've seen this.
I think it takes, number one, just spreading the information, letting people know that, you know, I say this again and again on all kinds of shows, you don't have to buy into conspiracy one little bit to not see how damaging many of these things can be.
All it takes is a little bit of common sense and not much extrapolation to understand that this is something that can easily be abused and misused to the detriment of Americans everywhere.
It's just like putting uniformed officers...
And in high school, like I talked about earlier, you don't have to believe that that's part of some UN conspiracy or Illuminati or global elitist.
All you have to understand is use some common sense.
If kids get used to having cops around everywhere they go, they come to your house if you're absent from school, they're in your school.
If you go to school, they're going to grow up and be adults.
They're going to get used to seeing cops everywhere.
So when sheriffs stand up or DPS guys and say, hey, we need a cop in every house or some ridiculous thing like that, they're just going to buy right into it.
They'll be used to it.
Incrementally, you're getting used to having things like this around.
Whether it's done on purpose or not, whether you believe in the motorcycle or not, it doesn't matter.
The mechanisms are there for people to institute whatever type of tyranny they want.
And we'll create a huge underground movement, which is already here, that can oppose this.
Now, what can we do locally?
You can get behind people.
We can just get one city council member elected or one commissioner, and this is the goal in the next few years, get one person elected who will get up there and use it as a bully pulpit and who will always vote against it, who will bring out the corruption, who will talk about the fictitious accounts and all the rest, and who will push it.
And we'll go on those radio programs and go on those forums.
It doesn't care what their peers say.
It doesn't care what the lobbyists say at the luncheons and the dinners.
It doesn't care about, well, don't you want this job at this corporation after you leave?
Because they care more about getting the information out to the people.
That's one solution.
But first, we've just got to educate people.
And that education is happening.
But this isn't some overnight victory.
And we're not going to win totally.
But if we lay down to it, we're going to get run over.
unidentified
And I think to finish that point is that What I mean by leading is, I'm not talking about leading by having a group of people literally following you around or you telling little minions what to do.
I'm talking about leading by taking control of your own life, by leading your family, your individual family unit.
In the case of me, I have two beautiful daughters and a beautiful wife.
To me, being a leader isn't necessarily getting in front of a camera or telling other people what to do.
And don't let your kids, you know, you come home, you're tired, your kids are sitting in front of the TV being indoctrinated.
Spend time with your kids.
Educate them.
Turn your children against the education system.
And I mean that.
At this point, they're turning your kids against you.
You better turn your kids against them.
They take your property taxes, force them into schools.
We've dropped from number one in the last 50 years to number 49. Even our best students are ranked 18th.
We are at the bottom of the barrel.
It's being done on purpose because educated...
Free-thinking, critical-thinking people are not the Prussian model, and that's what we have in this country, are just mindless people that regurgitate what they're told off worksheets by teachers that don't even have the...
It's not that we have bad teachers.
They don't have the power to teach what they want.
It's got to be the NEA's crap, which is a big socialist lobby controlled by a bunch of banks.
And that's all it comes down to.
We're in a damn propaganda war.
We need vouchers.
We need our kids out of the public schools.
Get your kids the hell out.
Get them out now.
Just focus on the family.
That's what's important.
The family's under attack because they know that people owe their allegiance to their family.
I owe my allegiance to my family, not to some bureaucrat, not to the all-holy state.
That's why they're going after all the other religions and trying to erect a new government religion of UN environmentalism and the Maitreya with Benjamin Krem.
I mean, the first thing I want to do is I give you the biggest hug because I know how you feel.
First of all, I'm like the original minion.
I work for the Capitol, and I've been through a legislative session, and I worked in the broadcasting part, and when I saw how laws were made and who they were made for...
The Masons were originally secret construction guilds because during the Dark Ages, the church and some other people wouldn't allow colleges unless it was religious-based.
So to keep the building alive, to build cathedrals, the Catholic Church allowed them to do this, but it had to be done in secret.
And so a lot of power was concentrated in the Freemasons.
And then Adam Weithaupt at Ingolstadt University in 1776 created a criminal organization called the Illuminati, and they killed people, they took over a lot of things, they paid off people, they had a lot of royalty involved, and they were basically organized criminals.
So basically any secret organization or club or clique is perfect to be infiltrated by criminal organizations.
But most Masons really want to help the community and be ignorant.
And it's just the upper rooms.
unidentified
Well, see, one time my grandfather, he's like in his 80s, and he's got a big Freemason ring on his finger, but he was always really generous.
And, I mean, I felt like, you know, I'm not going to look at him and go, oh, you know, my grandfather's this big destroyer of the world, and I don't want to keep you on the phone too long, but...
I'll tell you, I saw the thing where you did the DPS, I'm sorry, DPS protest.
Uh-huh.
Man, you were right on the money.
I feel like, I even left a note on your comment line, I don't like giving my fingerprint, and you had the guts enough to go and stand up against it, so if all you ever accomplish in your life is that you have the guts to go and say what everybody else is afraid of doing, man, you have done more than any politician, because when, you know, all they cared about during last week...
All they cared about last legislative session, do you know what they cared about?
That God-blessed stadium at UT. And I mean, that's all they cared about, getting passed.
Who can, who can, what businesses can make the most money paying the least taxes?
And I know, Alex, this is gonna sound really silly, but you are really sexy in this video.
Hey, do you still work there?
At the Capitol?
Yeah.
Uh-huh.
But I can't tell you where because it's like my boss is working.
Twisted Ways of Watching00:07:17
unidentified
I don't want you to go with your name or anything, but later on when you see those contact numbers, maybe if you have access to a computer, email me or something.
No, no, no.
We can get a lot of inside information that way.
You could be a mole for it.
I'd rather tell Alex myself.
But, you know, anyway.
Another thing, and I'll let you all go, but I saw this program about how they've already got those cameras in Germany, or in some place where they're watching traffic and stuff like that.
Do you think, like, eventually cameras are going to be in our homes or somehow or another we're just going to be followed?
Well, Andrea, let's be absolutely truthful about this.
Two and a half months ago in Germany, and I forget the, I mean, I saw the proceedings on C-SPAN, both the upper and the lower house in Germany almost unanimously passed indiscriminate wiretapping, bugging of homes.
That's bugs in homes and micro cameras put in citizens' homes.
As long as it wasn't in the sleeping area, and guess who's exempt?
I am crazy compared to the rest of society, and I am eccentric, and I am strange compared to most people.
But at the same time, my whole life, I never liked bullies.
I enjoyed nothing more than, you know, I mean, I'm telling you, that's the way I've always been, and I'm just sick of these people, and I'm sick of seeing people feeling like they're part of the establishment.
Well, anytime you want to send us the mailing address any information, I mean, we don't know who you are, and we would like you to send us any corruption that you can from the Capitol.
unidentified
Oh, God, have you got, like, major boxes that I can send it in?
He was one of the head BATF agents that was there.
He said he was 1,100 yards off the back of the building.
He said there was an automatic weapons firing.
I go, what about introspection?
What about when 60 Minutes refused to run?
What about the flare footage that played in the Congress?
Sir, he would smile like a criminal.
And we're going to play me confronting him next week, along with him calling Catherine Madison, a surviving branch of the video, a liar.
They're just bald-faced liars.
The guy looked like a big, fat criminal.
He would certainly smile.
He actually smiled and licked his lips when he talked about the survivors, the few survivors.
unidentified
Well, the lie was completely shown in the PBS because the footage was excellent, all the way down to the point where...
The fire started.
It was great.
It was like you could tell that they had cameras all over the place.
There was helicopters over the place right when it started.
And then right when you got to the point where the footage that I've seen on your show and things, they're right there.
But it's kind of grainy, I admit.
I want to see more.
But it's just like they sidestepped that whole thing.
It just all of a sudden, boom, the fire had started and there was no connection between it.
So you could tell that they left the part out.
It was so obvious.
Is this the front line where they really stress the dichotomy that exists within the FBI between the between the hostage rescue And they really went into that.
And one of the things I wanted to add on that, and thanks for bringing that up, is the fact that they had the tapes that they said that David Koresh, you know, on the back and forth.