Matthew Alper, a Vassar-educated philosopher-turned-screenwriter, argues in The God Part of the Brain that belief in spirituality is a hardwired survival mechanism—MRI scans show prayer alters brain regions like the amygdala and frontal lobes, while near-death experiences stem from glutamate and ketamine-like effects. He dismisses prayer studies as flawed, attributing religious conversions to crisis-induced neurochemistry, not divine intervention. Alper’s "hard-line atheism" rejects supernatural claims but acknowledges innate human tendencies toward transcendence, framing morality as a brain function rather than proof of God. Skeptics like Art Bell challenge his absolute stance, yet Alper insists science—not faith—explains these phenomena, leaving room for debate on whether spirituality is illusion or biology. [Automatically generated summary]
A few things, actually quite a few things, before we get to Matthew Alper.
I got an email which I kind of liked.
Art, I had a dream or a nightmare after last night's show.
Art?
It was that a meteor was heading straight for Earth, and NASA developed a plan to change its trajectory just by enough to make it miss Earth by a few miles.
But about 10 minutes before it was going to pass Earth, NASA notified the world that they'd screwed up on their original calculations, and the meteor was actually going to miss Earth with no interference from man.
But because of their error in calculations, it was now going to impact Earth.
So it was going to pass on by, but since we screwed with it, we all died.
It was a big flash, and then I woke up.
Bad nightmare.
Good show, though, Art.
Sorry about that.
And this I was shocked, surprised, and happy to see.
The way the planets influence the flow of dark matter into the sun now may explain one of the biggest mysteries in science, say particle physicists.
The sun's 11-year cycle is one of science's greatest mysteries.
Astronomers have watched in fascination for centuries now as the number of sunspots increases and then decreases over a regular cycle of almost exactly 11 years.
More recently, they seem to have discovered that at the same time, the sun's visible light luminosity changes about 10 to the minus 3, while its x-ray luminosity changes by a factor of 100.
So anyway, they're saying that sunspots coming and going, the 11-year cycle, is all produced by what else but dark matter.
Go dark matter.
I hear somebody listening to Shostak, Seth Shostak last night.
Reminds me of something I'd read about Thomas Jefferson.
Back in his day, nobody understood meteors, and scientists didn't believe even first-hand reports.
At some point, a couple of scientists from Harvard, I believe, tracked a meteor, recovered it, and proceeded to tell everybody about it.
Jefferson's response was, I'd sooner believe two Harvard doctors are lying than to believe rocks fall out of the sky.
I value SETI, but you know, they're searching time as well as space, and they don't know what they're looking for.
Thinking that advanced societies use lots of energy is kind of like a 19th century cowboy wondering about the horse poop problem in 21st century New York.
And I had a lot of wormhole stuff about Seth not believing in UFOs and all the rest of it.
It's okay.
I'm on to show stack.
All right.
You now have a very good reason to go to artbell.com.
I really got a good story up there for you.
You remember the other night I mentioned that two hydrogen bombs had been mistakenly dropped on North Carolina.
Didn't go off.
Save for one little safety feature that had three or four bolts in the right way and didn't change.
There were four safety things that would keep a bomb from going off after a B-52 disintegrates in mid-air and the bombs drop.
And three of the fail safes failed.
Well, the whole story was sent to me by a listener early today, and I've had Keith post It at artbell.com.
Imagine that.
All those years later, they say, oops, we dropped a couple of hydrogen bombs.
Now, hydrogen bombs are really big.
These would have been about 200 times bigger than Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
So, in other words, goodbye a lot of the East Coast and goodbye forever, or at least, you know, many, many, many generations.
You were about three volts or four volts separated from eternity.
You can read about it on my website if you want to.
Oh, the 90-minute cutoff.
Well, this continues to be something that AssiriusXM is working on.
They said they will look into it for you.
I even had somebody say, you know, I downloaded something on demand or whatever it was, and it's still cut off.
That's really crazy.
So we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
They're working on it, doing the best they can.
Remember, I said that I think people are afraid of comets because it's in our DNA.
Well, way back when, when things still went bump in the night, as if they don't now, if an infant was left alone in the dark, they should be so scared they remained silent.
And then I really want to note this.
The best book I ever read in my life was called Gravity.
It was by a gal named Tess Gerritson that I interviewed here on the air.
Longtime listeners, you'll remember it.
A lot of you, I bet, read that book.
And a lot of you probably now are thinking, wow, it was made into a movie.
The Navy Yard gunman says that it was ELF that made him do it.
Extremely low frequencies.
We know that low frequencies do affect humans.
However, he was also, I had heard, hearing voices.
So I'd worry more about the hearing voices part of it.
As Al-Qaeda linked terrorists through grenades, oh, I'm switching over here to real news, and fired automatic weapons, the three plainclothes Kenyan police officers, lightly armed, wearing no bulletproof vests whatsoever, helmets, no other protective gear, worked their way to the roof of Nairobi's Westgate Mall and led a group of frightened shoppers to safety.
Some malls around the world, by the way, have been scrambling now to add security.
The Iranian president declares he's ready to talk about nuclear stuff.
The earthquake in Pakistan, 7.7 I believe it was, raised an island.
People were up and walking around on it today.
They say it may stay or may not stay.
It was stone and bubbling gas that came up out of the seabed.
Interesting times we live in, right?
With a few words in a largely conciliatory speech to the United Nations, Iran's new president took aim at an Israeli fear, Israeli fear, that international pressure on Iranian nuclear programs could lead to scrutiny of Israel's own secretive nuclear facilities.
And I'm, you know, speaking of things nuclear, houses for a headline.
Nuclear experts, colon, Fukushima Unit 4 has shown signs of collapsing.
Underneath buildings, it's become saturated.
Known fractures in soil.
Large structure already went down at plant afterground was super saturated and had mudslide in March of 2011.
So if number four's holding apparatus should collapse, that's really, really, really bad news for all of us, potentially.
We're going to have some more guests on that kind of thing.
What's going on at Fukushima?
I have this definite sense, and I'm sure you do too, that we're not being told the whole story.
What do you think?
Well, all right, coming up in a moment, Matthew Alper.
I want to tell you about the, and I'm going to pronounce it correctly or else, Senta Ally.
It's the hardest thing to sell because, I don't know, it's hard to describe.
You can go to the Seacrane website and see it.
It's about nine inches long.
It's a portable stereo oval cylinder speaker powered with rechargeable batteries that last about 10 hours, and it sounds glorious.
Wonderful.
You will go, I don't believe it.
I simply don't believe the sound coming out of this thing.
Now here's the cool part.
It's Bluetooth.
What does that mean?
It means if you've got a bunch of tunes on your iPod or your cell phone, as long as your cell phone has Bluetooth and they all do, you just match it up to the center, and all your tunes come out sounding like you're in a concert hall.
That's really the bottom line.
You can take it to picnics, you can take it back with you, you can put it in another room, Bluetooth will sit and you'll still feed it.
And so anything that comes out of your phone, and that's not all you can hook it up to, of course.
You could hook it up to, say, a satellite radio, a tablet, an iPad, whatever.
It comes with FM radio built in.
I mean, this device is just scary good.
You show it to a friend, and you're going to be lucky if they don't walk away with it.
That's how good it is.
$69.95, $69.95.
Man, that is just unbelievable.
The prices for what you get here.
I don't know.
You've got to trust me on these things when I tell you this is good.
It's really, really good.
Call C-Crane at 1-800-522-8863.
That's 1-800-522-8863.
The C-Crane Company and the Centa Ally.
How is that?
I think I got it right.
Yes, isn't this nice?
Coming up in a moment, it's Matthew Alber.
And Matthew, Matthew will challenge your beliefs.
So as I said at the beginning of the program, if you don't want your beliefs challenged, you should go away now.
unidentified
The
There's a lady who's sure, all it glitters is gold.
And she's...
No, no, no, no, no.
I'll tell you what's wrong before I get off the floor.
Don't bring me down.
You wanna see us with your fancy friends.
I'm telling you we gotta save the air.
Don't bring me down.
No, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
I'll tell you what's wrong before I get off the floor.
Don't bring me down.
It's at 10, babies, and we're very serious.
To call Art Bell, please manipulate your communication device and call 1-855, Real UFO, at 1-855-732-5836.
Matthew Alper attended Vassar and graduated from sunny Stony Brook with a B.A. in philosophy.
He worked as a history teacher.
That's right, a history teacher in the Brooklyn Projects.
A tutor in the Philippines.
We'll have to talk about that.
And this one we'll really have to talk about.
A truck smuggler in Central Africa.
That's where his career peaked.
And a produced screenwriter in Germany from whence he returned to New York City to write what he considered to be his life's work, The God Part of the Brain.
Since its initial publication in 1996, Alper's work has been applauded by prominent scientists, academics, and Pulitzer Prize winners.
He has been cited in numerous magazines, appeared on a variety of radio and TV shows, lectured all across the U.S., and can be seen in the acclaimed featured documentary, The Nature of Existence.
His book is now in seven languages and has a fan base that extends around the globe, moreover.
The God Part of the Brain is the first book written on the subject and is considered a pioneer work in the new field of study known as neurotheology.
And, of course, I want to congratulate him on his recent conversion to becoming a Southern Baptist.
Somewhat, well, actually, there are numerous interpretations.
I take a kind of hard-line approach.
My definition of atheism is someone who not only does not believe in God, but does not believe in a spiritual realm, period.
See, I've gone to like atheist conventions and spoken, and you get a lot of like, rah-rah, down with religion, down with the church and the pope and whatnot, and even down with God.
But then if I start probing and asking, like, well, who here thinks that they have a soul, hands will still go up.
Though, you know, we can sort of sum that one up more easily.
You know, there's so much to cover.
It took like eight shows together, three to four hours each, to get through the God part of the brain.
So I'm all revved up and ready to tackle that one.
But I'd be glad to discuss Icarus of Brooklyn, A Spiritual Quest Gone Wrong, basically the prequel to God part, how I came to writing this book, my own sort of spiritual journey gone awry.
Well, and again, to refer back to this new book, Icarissa Brooklyn, which is broken into three parts, childhood, adolescence, and adulthood, which is really early adulthood.
The book actually only takes me to my 20th year.
And it was basically about myself on a quest because I was a curious child.
And the moment I kind of put together the fact that, you know, we're all going to die, I had questions.
And I was very driven by those questions, probably more than most.
And, you know, ended up with a degree in philosophy, which really didn't answer any of my questions.
But, yeah, so it was sort of my life's quest, like I'm sure many people.
And I eventually resigned myself to the fact that my life quest probably had no answer, at least one that I would ever resolve within my lifetime.
But I continued.
I persevered, and I continued, I was leaning towards the sciences at that point.
And I continued reading as much science as I could get my hands on, from atomic physics to microbiology to cosmology.
I wanted to, you know, leave no stone unturned.
And somewhere around, like, age 29, 30, I sort of had a little bit of an epiphany.
It led me to altered states of consciousness, but it never led me to anything that seemed like a definitive proof.
Actually, I'll tell the my, you know, again, at about age 30, at that point, I was living in Germany working as a screenwriter.
And things were going well, but there was always that thorn in the back of my head just sort of nagging, like, you still haven't figured out God, and you probably never will.
But I actually kind of stopped asking.
I was just like, all right, philosophies for children, time to put all that aside and like become a member of society, get a roof over my head, pay bills and whatnot.
And one night I was working on a screenplay and I was sitting at the computer and I don't know, for whatever reason, I was like, you know what, it's been probably a good five years since I gave any attention to this question.
So I thought, you know what, maybe every five years I'll come back to it.
So I typed out on the computer.
In the last five or so years, have I come any closer to coming across anything I could say definitive about God?
You know, and I realized there wasn't really anywhere to go with that.
I was like, no, I haven't seen any miracles, you know, no visions, no none of the above.
So I said, okay, well, what does science say about words?
Well, they come from the brain.
And what is, moreover, what does science say about words or anything for that matter that exists cross-culturally?
Well, it's an inherited instinct.
And thus began the quest for the God part of the brain.
The part of the brain that compels us to believe in and perceive some transcendental quality in the world, basically as a coping mechanism to help us survive our unique awareness of death.
I mean, that's the very center of what you're talking about here.
You think that our brain concocts God or that we may be genetically disposed to do so as a result of the innate fear, the overwhelming fear of mortality?
Well, what I'm suggesting is that basically with the evolution of self-conscious awareness, which was the trait that made humans the most powerful species on Earth, it's what distinguished us from all other animals.
Now, there are a few things that distinguish us from all other animals.
There's our language abilities, our musical abilities, our math abilities, a variety of functions that emerged in the neocortex during the hominid evolution.
However, the one that stood out to me as the most interesting and the most compelling was self-conscious awareness.
We're the only animal that recognize our own reflections, that can contemplate the meaning of existence and our place in it, that are aware of our own destinies and our own mortalities, that basically can experience existential angst, the knowledge that we and all of our loved ones are one day going to die.
Okay, close, but not totally the picture, because what I'm saying is that as we were evolving as an animal, during the hominid evolution, the various stages we went through of primitive man, from Homo erectus and Australopithecus and all of those subcreatures that came before us,
that as we were evolving and we evolved this sense of self-conscious awareness, that once we became aware of our own mortalities, even though again it made us the most powerful species on earth, which is an important part of the formula because it enabled us the power of self-modification.
Because from now on, because we are aware of ourselves, let's say it gets cold, we don't have to wait like all the other species and sit back dumbly and wait for natural selection to give us a thicker coat of fur five million years later.
We can say, ooh, I'm cold, and we can sew ourselves a coat in an hour.
So we've been able to transform the planet as a result of that one trait, self-conscious awareness.
But the drawback was it made us aware of our mortalities.
And the anxiety that came, the existential angst that came with that awareness, I'm suggesting, was so powerful, so overwhelming, that it may have wiped out the species had nature not selected a cognitive modification, basically a part of the brain that compels us to believe that there's this other realm out there,
so that we now feel that even though the physical body will die, that this other part, this spirit, will persevere and live forevermore.
So it basically is a coping mechanism.
It alleviates the horror of knowing that we're going to lose everything we have.
With other species, they can fight or flee their fears.
There's nowhere to run or fight against death.
So I'm suggesting that we are now hardwired.
Our species has parts of our brain, just like we have parts of our brain that are responsible for musical consciousness, language intelligence, that if you damage those parts, you'll lose your musical ability or your language ability.
Our abilities are connected to the brain.
I'm suggesting that there are parts of the brain that are just as physical and compel us to have this belief that there's this other realm out there, which is basically what has birthed every religion and mythology from the history of man.
So it's not like it compels us to believe our brains, it's wired into us.
It's part of the software in our heads to have this sensibility.
Like you were talking about the Matrix.
If there was one of the plugs in the Matrix that was like the religion plug that basically had us perceiving reality from this peculiar bent that there's something else.
And it kind of allowed us to deal with death and move on.
So that's what I'm suggesting, that it's wired into us.
It's a sort of modern twist on basic Darwinian evolutionary theory.
And it basically suggests, whereas Darwinian theory says that any trait that's universal to any species must have a genetic component.
So the fact that all cats have whiskers or a tail or that humans have a nose in the middle of their face, it's not a coincidence.
It's because it's in our genetic code, somewhere in our chromosomes or what we could call nose genes or basically, you know, every part of us, skin genes, eye genes.
We'd all be jumbled up and there wouldn't be such a thing as species.
So sociobiology basically just says the same thing is true.
The same principle applies to universal behaviors.
So for instance the fact that all dogs bark or cats meow or beavers build dams or honeybees build hexagonal shaped honeycombs.
All of these very specific behaviors from the zigzag dance of certain fish which is a 37 degree angle and then they turn a 41 degree angle and that's how they mate.
Very specific behaviors that are universal to these species again suggest that these are built into the animals part of the channel.
Well, I mean, you're suggesting to me that no matter what, these genetic traits are going to drive you to do certain things or to be a certain way or to look a certain way, whatever.
You're making this absolute argument.
Well, here comes Matthew Alper, and you're not living up to it.
So, essentially, let's take, for instance, with humans, the fact that every human culture, no matter how isolated, is communicated through language.
Basically, suggesting that we are a linguistic animal.
It's part of our makeup.
Well, now with the development of the neurosciences, we can look into the brain, and we know exactly where the language centers of the brain are.
It's the Wernicke's area, the Broca's area, the angular gyrus.
You damage one of those parts, you bang your head, you get a tumor in that area, you'll lose some part of your linguistic ability.
It's called an aphasia.
So, proof that these behaviors are generating from within the brain.
So, I took that principle and applied it to the fact that every human culture, from the dawn of our species, no matter how isolated, has believed in some form of a spiritual realm.
Some form of a spiritual reality, has prayed to something.
So, suggesting that it must be built into us, that somewhere in the human brain, there must be parts of the brain, what I informally refer to as the God part Of the brain that compels us to have these spiritual beliefs and to create religions around those beliefs.
So, again, so the universality is actually one of the proofs that there must be a part of the brain that generates these perceptions.
Okay, so then there's the neurophysiological proof.
So here I am just building up to suggest that maybe this is in our heads, that maybe the fact that it's so universal would suggest that it's coming from part of the brain.
So in the last 20 odd years or so, people have started putting people in the midst of prayer in MRIs.
They've done it with Franciscan nuns, Buddhist monks, and basically at this point, the hyper-religious of every belief system out there.
And what they find is the same thing happens if you meditate or pray, or you are in the midst of what you might call a religious or mystical experience.
Okay, what happens if you're having one of these experiences, based on the findings of MRIs, is that a couple things happen.
One, for instance, your brain's amygdala, part of the limbic system which is responsible for generating fear and anxiety, gets a decreased blood flow.
One of the universal descriptors of a spiritual experience is a sense of euphoria, bliss, tranquility.
Normal fears and anxieties are dissipated.
It relaxes us.
So we kind of have like a built-in drug in our heads.
I'm willing to concede these changes that you have described in the brain, however.
What's wrong with suggesting that when you get in that state, when you get in a spiritual state, whatever it is you worship, that that entity is not producing these changes in your brain that are causing you to feel this way?
Because they've done these experiments on people from every religion.
So it would mean that basically any belief we can come up with, if I believe in the great big bird in the sky, he must be real because I'm having the same effect as someone who's praying to Allah or Jesus.
Then you've got this guy, Dr. Ramachandran at UCLA, who found, he was doing research on epilepsy, and he found that there was a group of epileptics who suffered from what was called temporal lobe epilepsy.
And people who suffered from this specific type of epilepsy, first of all, 25% of them tend towards hyper-religiosity.
So he was finding that people who had temporal lobe epilepsy, one out of four of them were somehow coincidentally hyper-religious people.
Moreover, they were reporting that during their seizures, they were having intense religious experiences.
And as a matter of fact, reading from their Bible or hearing things that in any way reminded them of their religion, choir, choruses, or whatever, could stimulate the seizure, in which case they would come out of it feeling like that they had a religious experience.
To support that, there are two scientists, two doctors, Savor and Raven, also at UCLA, who were neuroscientists and historians and started looking back and doing some research and finding that a lot of the world's prophets suffered symptoms that seemed to indicate that they were potentially epileptics, from Joan of Arc to the Apostle Paul to Muhammad.
In historical writings, there seems to be evidence That they suffered from epilepsy.
Dostoevsky, for instance, who was an epileptic, he wrote in his book The Idiot, he wrote, and I quote: I have really touched God.
He came into me.
You healthy people cannot imagine the happiness we epileptics feel seconds before we suffer from one of our attacks.
Again, all suggesting that this is a brain state.
Not like God's literally entering these people, but that their brains, which albeit a little bit broken, somehow in that breakage, it's prompting, it's inducing a religious experience.
I also believe, and I hate to help you here, but it is true that scientists have been able to electrically stimulate brains in certain areas and produce religious slash spiritual experiences.
What you're talking about is the transcranial magnetic stimulator, which electromagnetically stimulates specific points in the brain.
And if you point it at like the temporal lobe, for instance, or some of these other parts, it can induce a religious experience.
Which eventually I'm going to get to with the whole ethnobotany, the last proof I'll go to, which is when people take certain drugs or plants to do the same thing.
Again, suggesting it's all chemical in nature.
But back to the neurophysiological, the same person who was going around with his transcranial magnetic stimulator was also interviewing people.
And in his interviews with high school students, he found that one out of five of them who reportedly said that they were very religious had also reported that they suffered some type of traumatic brain injury during their lives.
This coincides with the work of a Dr. Arnold Sadwin, the former chief of neuropsychiatry at University of Pennsylvania, who was doing research on something called organic psychosyndrome.
Basically, people who suffer from traumatic brain injuries and it alters their behaviors or their perceptions.
He found that there were people, and he was one of the first people who wrote to me after hearing me on your show saying, you know, I've been doing this research for years and you made it make sense because I could never understand why families of people were saying, yeah, he suffered a head injury and suddenly he's super religious or he was super religious and now he doesn't go to church or couldn't care less.
That people can suffer from religious organic psychosyndromes or if you're banged in the head, it can suddenly turn you into a hyper-religious person or a non-religious person depending on where you started from.
Again, all suggesting that these are just based on the mechanics of the brain as opposed to some ethereal reality beyond us.
That it's all an extension, a manifestation of what's going on inside of our heads.
So more or less, and you know, I could keep going, but that's generally the work that's been done to suggest from a neurophysiological standpoint that, again, God is in your head and not outside of it.
Have you done any research at all into why it is that people from New York and specifically Brooklyn irritate the hell out of people in the rest of the country?
I mean, on top of everything else, I remember on the old shows we had, I would get these emails afterwards raging, and then at the bottom, they'd always put, and besides, I can't stand his New York accent.
So for instance, most of religiosity, people who really talk about their religion or God, like these temporal lobe epileptics, it seems to be coming from the temporal lobe.
Whereas the spiritual experience, which is a different thing, it's that sense of calm, of oneness with the universe, God consciousness, etc.
That's based in a combination of like the amygdala, the parietal lobe.
It's a different experience.
So basically there's two things coinciding at work here.
You've got the capacity for us to have these experiences where our normal ego boundaries are reduced and we feel one with the world, one with the universe, maybe one with God.
So through these experiences, we're left feeling that we're connected to something higher.
So based on these feelings that prompt beliefs, we then, through the religious instinct, which is more responsible for creating political institutions, for creating laws and rituals and customs, for mythologies, for basically solidifying those spiritual experiences we have,
which are more sensory in nature, and consolidating them into sort of a mythical paradigm, which has politics and customs and rituals and rules we have to abide by, which give us a sense of community, a sense of belonging, and a sense of purpose.
So that's why you can have people who might report that they're very religious, they're very involved in going to church and the rituals, but they wouldn't necessarily describe themselves as spiritual.
And you have other people who say, I'm highly spiritual, but I'm not at all religious.
It just means that you believe in some aspect of a spiritual realm, but you might not abide by any particular rituals you might not feel you need to go to church or confess to a priest or any of the above but you still feel that you're connected to the spiritual realm all right so if we were to examine your brain we would find your amygdala flooded with blood constantly right you'd probably just be like bugs bunny chasing a turtle you know i'm
actually not really trying to be funny here uh it seems to me that if you can prove one thing then you should be able to take somebody such as yourself a true non-believer well and and and prove prove the other and and show the blood flow continues as normal there's no lessening you're not relaxing you're going 100 miles an hour as usual you you only lead me to chapter 12 why are there atheists all right uh let's jump to chapter 12.
Well, basically, for every physical trait we possess, we fall into a bell curve.
If you take any given population, let's say a random sample of 1,000 people, and you measure them, let's say, a physical trait like height, basically the majority will fall into the category of what we will call average height, the bulge of the bell curve.
And on the tapering extremes, there might be 10%, let's say, who are shorter than the norm and 10% that are taller than the norm.
Anyway, so let's take something, you know, a more abstract trait like musicality.
Same thing.
You take a random sampling of 1,000 people from any culture, and you investigate their musical abilities.
And you'll find the same bell curve will ensue, that the average person, the majority of people that you poll, will have what we would call average musical intelligence or musical ability.
They can hum a tune.
If you clap in rhythm, they can copy you.
But on the tapering extremes, there are going to be, let's say, 15% on either side who are going to be either tone deaf on one end and musical savants on the extreme of the other end.
You know, you listen to a John Philip Sousa march and you get people riled up and they go out and they fight for you.
You play, you know, some more peaceful, contemplative, classical music and it relaxes people.
Or they feel sad.
So music can generate all these various emotions.
But generally speaking, let's say in terms of musical talent, the same bell curve emerges.
Again, it's a physical trait.
It comes from a part of the brain.
And that's a result of genetic variants.
We're all different.
We all, you know, but we fall within a curve for every physical trait.
The same thing applies to spirituality and religiosity.
So, though the majority of the world, of our species, has what we could call average spiritual slash religious intelligence, an average capacity to believe in something, to pray to something.
On the tapering extremes, you have a portion of any given population who are going to be hyper-religious.
They're going to be the people, you know, giving heartfelt sermons at the pulpit at 10 years old.
They've got the spirit born into them.
And then on the other extreme, you're going to have people who just are religiously tone deaf.
They don't get it.
They don't care.
It doesn't play any interest in their life.
They're more interested in going fishing, fixing their car engine, whatever it is that turns them on.
But they don't get God and they couldn't care less.
So, again, because of the physicality, the physical nature of this perception, not everyone is religious.
Just like not everyone is musical.
It's part of our nature.
But whatever our nature is, not, you know, not everyone is any one thing.
i was honestly searching yeah yeah they they've they've done studies and basically percentage of population how about yeah but they say that the percent in america that the percentage of people who claim to be atheists is something like eight percent eight percent yeah interesting yeah which would kind of fall into the bell curve.
But with most um developed Western nations, we are on the low end, whereas most European countries would report something closer to between third, twenty and thirty percent of atheism.
And even, for instance, in China, where religion is condemned, you know, religion is the communist party.
You're not allowed to have a church there.
Nevertheless, as much as you might try to suppress it, same thing as they did in communist Russia before that fell and is now soon to re-emerge.
But even in China, they're reported as being some of the most superstitious people on earth.
So they've repressed religion, and this tendency, this need to believe in some type of transcendental alternative reality has emerged through superstition.
They are heavy into numerology, the luck of numbers, having the right numbers, etc.
So it's like, you know, if you can only suppress instinct so far, eventually the animal in man will emerge somehow.
And this is part of the animal man, to be a religious animal.
Well, I mean, what I'm suggesting here essentially would invalidate anyone's beliefs, whether you believe in the power of the crystal at your bedside or...
Well, and I do, though, again, the God part of the brain mostly focuses on religious and spiritual consciousness, I do go into certain peripheral items here and there, like music or love, for instance.
And I think on one of the first shows, you asked me, well, what about love?
Is that also just the mechanics of the brain?
Are you saying that there's nothing spiritual about that?
And I said, well, give it time, and eventually they will find it's the mechanics of the brain and since have.
So basically, you've got a woman, Dr. Helen Fisher at Rutgers, and it's kind of her specialty.
She writes on the neuromechanics of the experience of love and basically have found that even though lust is governed by the hormones of estrogen and testosterone, the feeling of what we call love, of being bonded by another person, is guided by our neurotransmitters, particularly to those of oxytocin and vasopressin.
So for instance, after we have sex with someone, our bodies flood with oxytocin, vasopressin, these two neurotransmitters that make us feel very connected, or what we might call in love with the person we were just with.
Which would explain why two people who might be Utter strangers met drunk at a party one night and after a night of passionate lovemaking woke up looking each other's eyes like we found the one, even though they might not know each other's last names, maybe even first names, because it's just our chemical our chemistry manipulating us and making us have these feelings.
Moreover, for instance, if you stimulate a woman's nipples, it will also cause the secretion of these neurotransmitters, not just for the sex act, but also if an infant child is suckling at her breast, it will cause the secretion of these neurotransmitters, which will make the mother feel bonded to her child.
Well, again, based on research that's now being done in this field on the sort of the brain science behind religious perception, there's a guy, Dr. Janssen, who his specialty is near-death experiences, and he studied the brains of, you know, basically people having these experiences.
And essentially, a near-death experience, what it is, is when you're, first of all, no one has ever clinically died, unless you're a mythical character from Homer's Odyssey.
Nobody does.
Your heart might have stopped, but your heart's just a pump.
It's just an organ that's a pump, like a bite pump.
All it's doing is getting oxygen to your cell.
If your brain has stopped, if your brain has not received oxygen for, let's say, 10 minutes, and then you came back, then you can tell a story.
Well, the medical community would probably disagree, but fine.
Regardless, this guy, Janssen, has found that what happens is if your body is getting, if you are getting a decreased blood flow to the brain, so you suffer a heart attack, your heart starts pumping that blood, you are in an accident, you're gushing blood, so you're not getting the same amount, you have low oxygen levels to your brain, your brain will secrete a neurotransmitter called glutamate.
Glutamate is very similar to the drug ketamine, which is a psychedelic.
One of the things it does is it makes your body start pumping out endorphin, so it relaxes you.
So let's say you were in an accident, you've been gassed somewhere, and you're losing blood, your heart will relax.
Instead of panicking, your heart pumps faster, you die quicker, you relax, your heart slows down, you don't lose blood as quickly.
So it's all just the mechanics of the body trying to keep us alive.
You know, nice little evolutionary trick.
But not only have they found that this is what happens with the secretion of glutamate, but they have used ketamine to induce the same experience because the chemical bond of ketamine is similar to glutamate.
And if you give people glutamate, you can induce a near-death experience.
And one of the things he found, for instance, is when the brain secretes glutamate, the optic nerve is triggered.
So basically, whether your eyes are closed or not, you see a white light.
Your being is filled with a sensory perception of white light.
And then probably what's going on is the rest of the neuromechanics involved in religious experience.
Maybe your temporal lobe is being stimulated, so you're having experiences of God and religion.
But one thing, so a couple things.
One thing is the universality, the fact that the scriptures are the same regardless of culture would lead me to believe that it's a facet of our biology.
Moreover, you could have 10 people from 10 different religions and they'll tell you at the end of their tunnel, they saw Allah, and the next guy saw Jesus, and the next guy saw Moses, and the next guy saw Zeus, and the other guy saw Odin.
So are all of them real?
Or is it just the way that the brain operates that it triggers in our heads to have these perceptions of what we were taught that God is?
So again, for me, the argument falls in favor of that it's all neuromechanical.
It's not like we're actually getting a visitation, like some, you know, the Holy Ghost out there of every religion knows that you're on the brink of death and comes and visits you by, you know, suddenly you see white light.
And again, so then that must mean that, you know, the great Big Bird is also out there because that's who I see when I shoot up petamine for recreational reasons.
Well, and again, this is all stuff that I discuss in Icarus of Brooklyn, the prequel follow-up to God's Heart, in which I discuss my drug experiences.
There's a chapter, Drugs and Meditation, and the chapter after that is called LSD.
So, yeah, I was exploring all sorts of psychedelics with the hopes.
Again, you know, not that I expect this to curb the flow of love letters, as you call them, but I want people to realize that I was just a guy looking like anyone else to find God.
I was hopeful that he was out there.
I mean, heck, if right now I had the option between immortality in another 30 or so odd years and then nothingness forevermore, I mean, heck, I'll take eternity.
Well, no, I don't believe I will because I believe that I've done ample research in this direction and I am convinced just as I am with most of the principles of scientific theory, be it ever.
You said you had a bad LSD trip landed you in a mental hospital.
Yeah.
But you also said that when people get damaged to their brain, that suddenly they can come out thinking an entirely new thing, not believing in God or suddenly believing in God or having a total conversion.
It's not like I had a bad LSD trip and suddenly I woke up and I was an atheist one day.
No, when I finally came out of this bad trip with the help of psychopharmacological drugs, I was basically restored to my old self, which was the guy who was questioning.
I continued to question thereafter, but I now had a little bit more information about how the brain works and the chemistry of the brain.
Well, basically, I'm saying all of our religious and spiritual experiences are chemical in nature.
They're all coming from the neurochemistry, the neuromechanics of the brain.
So, for instance, I was going through my initial proofs or arguments to validate this notion of a God part of the brain, and I went through the sociobiological and neurophysiological, but I didn't get to finish.
So, let me, if I can quickly stick those in there, there's also the genetic argument, and like I said, what I call the ethnobotanical.
The ethnobotanical is relevant at this point because basically ethnobotany is the study of cultures and their use of various plants, and for any number of reasons, including part of their religious experience.
Various cultures have used what are called entheogens, substances which are used by different cultures to induce a religious experience.
So you have everything from the Scythians using cannabis to the Africans using ayahuasca to the Aztecs using mescaline, which they refer to as the food of the gods, all to induce a religious experience.
And this is, again, a universal.
So, again, basically suggesting that if you can take a substance and it can make you see God, that would suggest that it's the chemistry of that substance that altered the brain in a specific way, not like you had a visitation.
Like, God came from a cloud up in the sky, he saw that you popped a pill or chewed on a plant and decided to come down, whether it be in the form of Zeus or Odin or Allah or the great spirit bird, whatever you want to call it.
Again, this is all, I would believe, validation that it's coming from the neuromechanics of the brain as opposed to an actual visitation from our spiritual realm.
All right, but just because you took a shroom and suddenly you feel very religious or you feel very spiritual, that doesn't negate the possibility of there still being a God and the shroom just called, mushroom just caused you to appreciate it more.
And I agree, but the thing is, the burden of proof, you can never, look, nothing that I write or say or investigate could ever, with absolute certainty, negate the existence of a spiritual realm.
So for instance, right now as I speak, there might be some magical invisible leprechaun dancing on my head.
And I could never prove that there isn't.
But the burden of proof should lie in that there is, because it's an absurdity to expect.
Again, one can't, through proof, negate the existence of things.
You can only prove the existence.
So if I were going to believe in something, if I were going to dedicate my life to the belief in something, I wouldn't put the burden of proof saying, well, why do I put all of my energy into believing, let's say, in the dancing leprechaun?
Simply because you can't prove he's not there.
I would hope that I'd be able to say, well, let me tell you 50 ways where I can prove, not say I felt him or I saw him, but I can prove, just like I can prove one plus one is two, or that if I turn the key on my car ignition, the car starts.
You know, so again, absolutely nothing I say will ever negate the existence of God.
I mean, even in the sciences, I mean, look, you know, we use science for every, all of our technologies are built on science.
We go to doctors, we take medications, we get heart transplants, we fly on airplanes.
Right now on the phone we're using, it's a scientific technology.
If it weren't for science, we wouldn't be talking right now.
So, nevertheless, within the sciences, there are only five laws, the laws of thermodynamics.
Everything else is considered a theory.
So, the theory of electromagnetism gave birth to the phone that we're on.
So, it's all theory.
So, as a scientist, I have to allow for the disclaimer that, look, as Einstein said, it takes a million proofs to prove a theory right.
It only takes one to prove a theory wrong.
So, for instance, if tomorrow the sun does not set in the west, boom, there goes the whole theory of the earth turning around the sun, etc.
It just takes one to make it go wrong.
And that, you know, again, as a scientist, I feel responsible to put that disclaimer out there.
But still, just as much as I believe that when this phone rang and I pick it up, that Art Bell's going to be on the other end, or at least that the phone's operating, or if I flip this light switch next to me, that the light will go off, I have faith that the light will go off.
But before I flip it, if you say, do you know 100%, absolutely, that the light will go off?
I'd say, no, I feel 99.9999% that the light will go off.
All right, so if you were to suddenly seize up, drop on the floor, see the light, talk with your grandmother, who would sit you down and say things to you that she never said when she was alive, and you came back, I guess when you revived and you felt a little better, you'd say damn chemicals.
Well, just because I had that perception, I don't even know if she played poker with Aunt Leah, you know, but in my brain, that's what happened.
Now, if I passed out and came out of a coma and said, you won't believe this, I had this wild hallucination of grand, and they stopped me and said, yes, we saw two.
We were at your bedside, and suddenly the spirit of grandma appeared, and she told us about how she played poker with Aunt Leah.
Then I'd be like, okay, this just got to be awesome.
Then I would just say either I don't recall when she told me that or somewhere sitting in my subconscious was the realization that she sold her house and I kind of forgot about it until I had this hallucination.
Look, there are people every day, let's just say, now every society has their own mythology.
So let's just say in the Christian world, Christians who truly believe in the word of the Bible, so who are true creationists.
And in their conscious reality, creationism is the way that the world came about.
That 5,000 years ago or whatever it was, in seven days God created the world.
That is as real to them as you're suggesting the hallucination or, you know, this fact that my grandmother came to me or that it's somehow a faith for me.
The faith for me isn't atheism, it's science.
And science represents the lack of that belief.
So, for instance, you could say...
Again, because I wouldn't put that much faith in not possible to receive.
Again, our heads are full with so much subconscious information, stuff that we forgot, that if we're reminded of today, we might think it was new.
Or I might just distrust the person who's saying it.
Maybe they want attention.
So they're going to say, yeah, I know that I died and I had a visitation by my grandma.
But you could say, like, for instance, evolutionary Theory, the opposing belief over creationism, you could say, oh, well, I think that's your religion.
And I'd say, no, it's not.
It's just something I have faith in because it follows a certain logical order that I have put my faith in.
So just because I don't believe in creationism, it doesn't mean, which for some people, that is their religion, that is their belief.
Just because I don't believe in their belief, it doesn't mean my belief becomes a religion.
When you say that you would ignore the science of having received a fact you could not have received any other way, you would ignore it and have faith in your atheism.
For the same reason, and again, based on all of this very thorough research that I've done, I have such faith in this notion that it's all based in our brain, it's all perceptual, that even if it was something as specific that I came out of a coma and was like,
I don't know, numbers 8, 7, 5, and let's say listed a length of 20 numbers, and my mother turned to me and said, oh my God, that was your grandmother's Social Security number and her something else number.
How did you know that?
And I said, well, I don't know.
I had some in my, when I was out cold, grandma came to me and she told me those numbers.
Let's say you take those numbers after disclaiming it all, and you get down to the corner store and you bet those numbers and you hit the lottery for about $800 million.
If God sits me on his lap, signs his autograph, and the members of the Supreme, all the Supreme Court justices stand around observing it and notarize the autograph as authentic, I'll think about it.
Listen, I got a wormhole message a little while ago from somebody who had just bought the C-Crane Wi-Fi antenna.
And they were saying, Art, oh, we were so frustrated.
The computer we have was dropping constantly in the middle of your show and dropping and dropping and dropping.
Turns out it was because of the Wi-Fi signal.
So listen to me.
Please listen to me.
The Super USB Wi-Fi Antenna 3 will end those troubles.
Whatever you get for a Wi-Fi signal now, this will like triple it.
Quadruple it.
Big time.
All you do is plug this baby into the USB port of your computer.
Add a little software.
And voila, you are seeing Wi-Fi signals from far away.
If you're a trucker, it's just a rod with a 15-foot wire on it.
So, you know, it's got a couple of little suction cups And you stick it to your window, and now you're seeing Wi-Fi really far away.
And of course, what you're near, you're going to get so well.
So, whether it's at home or you're in a truck, I don't care where you are, the USB Wi-Fi antenna, C-Crane's version of it, will put everything else into the dirt.
And it's only $99.95.
So, as usual, I say, trust me on this.
I've been with C-Crane for a long time.
I know what I'm talking about.
They know what they're doing.
Order it.
You can go to the C-Crane website, ccrane.com, or you can call them right now.
So as much as it might be speculated, at least within our own solar system, we've yet to find definitive life.
So, okay, here's my take on alien life.
Do I believe that somewhere in the universe organic forms have emerged besides man?
I would probably say yes.
Do I think intelligent life has formed comparable to man?
Even possible.
Do I think we will ever meet any of them?
That I do not believe.
And here's my reasoning.
Just based in the physics.
Now, of course, you can negate all of this with time travel and space machines and magic wands that make you move from galaxy to galaxy in a second.
But based on physics as I understand it, based on the principles of thermodynamics, this is the problem that I see.
Let's take the closest star to Earth, Alpha Centauri.
Alpha Centauri is 4.2 light years away, and it's the closest star.
So it's the closest possible solar system where other life could have emerged.
Is it likely that it's emerged, coincidentally, the nearest star to us?
Probably not.
But let's even take the nearest star and work with that.
4.2 light years away.
Well, light travels 186,000 miles per second, making a light year equal to approximately 6 trillion miles.
That makes Alpha Centauri approximately 25 trillion miles away, the closest solar system to Earth, to our solar system.
At that distance, if you were to take the fastest spacecraft that humans have created, which was the Voyager, at the speed of the Voyager, it would take 75,000 years for a craft to go from Earth to Alpha Centauri.
And again, this is giving a leap that we're even going to say, let's say there's life on Alpha Centauri in one of the planets in its solar system.
Even intelligent life.
Right, probably not, but even let's even, I'm just going to give the benefit of the doubt, super intelligent life, smarter than us, maybe even capable of space travel.
They're bouncing around the planets in their solar system.
For them to get here, again, at a super fast pace, It would take 75,000 years.
Let's say it's a species.
I'm going to even give another stretch.
Let's say it's a species that happens to have great longevity.
Let's look at another species because I already know where you're going with that one.
Let's look at a species that's been on Earth for a billion years longer than we have.
Quite likely, actually, when you consider things.
A billion years longer than we have.
Look at what has changed for us, Matthew, in the last hundred years.
Now, project another billion years.
Now, let's start to assume that they've found a way to travel faster than light, or they've found a way to fold back space and jump from point A to point B. In other words, they can figure out.
But I do believe that the speed of light is a constant.
I don't believe we will ever travel at it.
I don't believe that molecules, like in Star Trek, that there'll ever be, you know, where we can project a human from one place to another in an instant where molecules will dissipate, be sent through space beyond the speed of light, and then re-emerge.
I don't, personally, I don't think, again, and this is all just based on my understanding of the laws of physics.
Maybe what we know today will one day be antiquated, and yes, we'll travel at the speed of light.
I don't see it.
But in the meantime, from what we do understand, yes, it would take like 20 generations of a very long-living species to travel here.
So even let's say they can bend space, it's still going to take a lot of work, and there's probably a lot of risk involved.
So why would a species risk to bend space, come to Earth, do a few anal probes, maybe cut a few circles in the crops?
It's like when you travel a gazillion miles to ring someone's doorbell and run, like, why aren't they here?
Why aren't we hanging out with them?
Why haven't they dominated us, made us their like, you know, their dolls to play with?
That's all fair comment, I suppose, and I don't have an answer for it, but I think that the other argument that they are out there somewhere and that there's somebody millions or billions of years ahead of us is a reasonable argument.
And so we could be visited.
You know, you can't just blanketly deny it.
By the way, I want you to hear this love letter, and this is one, too.
Ian says, hey, Art, I just wanted to say as a former Christian and now an atheist, I agree with Mr. Alper, and I want to voice support for his views.
I feel far more spiritual feeling looking at pictures from Hubble than I do from the Bible.
That contrary to all of the alleged science articles showing, depicting humans with giant foreheads to fit their bigger brains and longer fingers, et cetera, et cetera, that this is it.
Well, I'm always speaking on a personal level, but I'll tell you why.
This is my personal belief.
And it kind of goes back to the theory again that basically with the evolution of self-conscious awareness, humans have transcended the process of natural selection.
Let me explain.
So up until humans, let's say there's a shift in the Earth's axis and the temperature of the planet drops 100 degrees.
Well, what happens?
The environment changes and all of the animals that exist on the planet suddenly have to adapt.
So let's say, for instance, the creature with the furriest coat tends to survive and reproduce long enough, lives long enough to reproduce, whereas the others in its species start to die off.
5 million years later, we've got a furrier species, such as the woolly mammoth.
Now, humans come along, and that's how evolution has worked from the beginning of organic matter, 3.2 billion years ago.
So now all of a sudden man comes into the picture, and because of our capacity for self-conscious awareness, the temperature drops, as I said before, it gets colder.
We don't sit passively back like every other animal.
We can say, I am, I am cold.
And we have the digits and mathematical and engineering capacity to manufacture a coat of fur in an hour.
And that applies to every possible technology.
If we look up at the sky and say, oh, look at those lucky birds.
Think how advantageous it would be to fly.
Boom, we build wings.
We want to go underwater like the fish.
Boom, submarines, whatever we want, basically, we can manufacture it.
We can travel, unlike any species, we can migrate to any Portion of the planet, and we can create a synthetic environment in which we can survive.
Meaning that no matter what changes take place, because that's what forces evolution, an environment changes, there's a climatic change, there's a new animal introduced into the area.
Whatever the case, the tectonic plate shift, and suddenly the Earth's surface is different, it's hotter, it's colder, there's lava pools involved, whatever the case may be.
With humans, we can migrate to any environment and we can synthesize it to suit our needs so that we won't change anymore, but basically we will change our environment way sooner than the environment will change us.
So we're done naturally selecting.
We now modify ourselves to suit our environment in any way possible.
We got done when we got born, which was about 100,000 years ago at the dawn of Homo sapien.
Our species, and our species alone, none of the progenitors of man, not Homo erectus and Peking man and Australopithecus, none of them had all of the potential that we do.
Anybody who suggests that there's a study that if everyone prays, there are consequences, would not explain the fact that every one of us continues to die.
And you tell me one person who prays that isn't praying that we live longer.
And any guest that would come onto your show and suggest that there are, I would just say, is a charlatan selling snake oil.
Because you know what?
For every case where, like, little Jimmy who was diagnosed with cancer and the doctor said has three months to live and the community prayed and he lived, and well, what was it?
Of course it was a miracle.
There's no other explanation.
For every little Jimmy, there's 50,000 Jimmies who are dead because everyone in the community still prayed for them.
Okay, but you're still whizzing by my argument, and that is that there have been controlled studies of people who don't know they're being prayed for versus those who are not being prayed for, and the recovery rate is significantly different.
Well, again, I would have to go with the argument about what God, which God, the great big bird in the sky, the snake spirit?
How can a belief in such disparate realities cause the same thing and then one argue that there must be a God?
So if I believe in the snake spirit or the raven spirit or, you know, the Norse wolf spirit or any number of gods, Buddha, Krishna, Moses, Jesus, Allah, etc., etc., the list goes on, and they all produce the same effect, how is that evidence that all of those characters exist?
There are some evil people out there, but when I refer to evil, I put it in quotes.
Because just as I don't believe in God, I don't believe in evil.
Because evil would signify, the way you're suggesting it, that there are forces at work, as if there's like a spiritual good and a spiritual evil.
And again, I refer back to the brain.
I believe that good and evil are categories by which we are wired to perceive certain aspects of human behavior.
So it's our nature to look at people who, let's say, commit destructive acts against the community and be repulsed by them, to come up with words that indicate evil and that they should be punished.
And these are universals in every culture.
Of course, it's necessary that we judge those who want to hurt us in a negative way.
And this is the language of basically keeping us alive as a social organism.
Moreover, to again refer back to the brain, there have been numerous studies done on moral reasoning and its relationship to the brain.
So for instance, well, the first indication was a man, Phineas Gage, in 1848 worked in the railways.
There was an explosion.
A metal rod penetrated his head, pierced his right frontal lobe, a portion of the brain that's now referred to as the Brodman 10 region.
He went from a upstanding, church-going, hard-working man to a vagabond, thief, lying, cheat.
Left his family, left his job, roamed the world stealing and cheating and lying.
Total mystery.
And then until 150 years later, when they could now do neuroimaging and found that others who live today who've suffered similar damage to the Broadman 10 region of their brain become sociopathic.
And that they've done studies, MRIs, of people on death row.
And a good portion of people on death row, regardless of what prison you go to, have suffered trauma to their Broadman-10 region in the brain.
You've got Dr. George Moll, the head of neurology and neuroimaging in Rio, who has done experiments basically putting people in an MRI and asking them a variety of questions.
What's your favorite color?
Who do you think is a funnier comedian?
And then sticking in, in between, questions that dealt with moral reasoning.
You know, is it okay for a man to steal from someone just because he's stronger?
But what I am going to say is if you manage to convert all these people, those who have been relatively moral because they believe in the hereafter, I don't believe there's one person out there who, because he believes in the hereafter, made them a little more honest, a little less deceptive, a little less apt to smash someone over the head with a bottle.
And again, because I believe these are all facets of the human condition, of the way we are hardwired to perceive reality.
Religiosity is one part of the brain.
Moral consciousness is another.
Some people are born highly moral or with a propensity to be highly moral regardless of their upbringing.
And some people are going to be born with a propensity towards sociopathy, again, regardless of how they're raised.
You could raise someone with a predisposition to sociopathy by Mother Teresa and some other holy person and Gandhi, and they'll still go out and be Jeffrey Dahmer because they were born broken because it's just a broader.
I believe that true moral reasoning should be taught not because should be taught in a way based in social science, not as a threat that the only reason you shouldn't go stab your neighbor and take his belongings is because you'll burn in hell.
I think that teaches a primitive moral sensibility, whereas if you teach a more sophisticated moral sensibility, like you don't not kill your neighbor, well, there's a couple reasons.
And there's someone, there's a psychologist named Kohlberg, and he kind of put moral consciousness into different levels.
The reason for doing good out of fear of punishment is the lowest level of moral reasoning a human can have.
By the way, speaking to somebody fairly high up earlier in the day in XM, they said that all of you have been somewhat unexpected.
In other words, the turnout here has been kind of over the top and rain than what they thought it would be.
So now you know if that has contributed to some of the server problems and some of the rest of it, there you go.
And all kinds of new stuff at artbell.com.
Make sure you take a visit, man.
There are some really good stories up there, including the hydrogen bombs dropped on North Carolina.
The real story is up there.
It's amazing to me that our government can do something 50 years ago like that and then think, well, it's okay.
You know, once 50 years has passed, the fact that they dropped a couple of hydrogen bombs that came within three volts of blowing up the whole East Coast.
It's okay to tell that after 50 years.
Makes you wonder what we're going to hear 50 years from now.
And if he doesn't make you think, then you're brain dead.
unidentified
Well, the United States is still, in its own way, highly religious in a very straight creationist way.
I think for about, what, 60%, 70% of the population.
So that's only to be expected.
But I enjoy the way that he forces us to think about different areas, parts of our brain, ways we interact, and to challenge.
If you're not challenged, that'll be the end of us if we don't keep challenging ourselves to consider these issues.
But I wanted to push him a little on the question of this sort of Buddhistic way of looking at things, the oneness of all things.
Every single particle and wave that makes up existence as we know it, at least the visible universe, at one point, if you take it back to the so-called Big Bang, was all together.
Every bit was all together in one infinitesimally small point, something like 10 to the negative 40 in terms of the size of something so small and so united.
So, I hope you'll meditate on that concept and answer me this.
So you either have a straight creation event where an outside force creates that universe either at that moment in time or if the universe, as we know it, is the result of a white hole coming out of a black hole, still you have to take it back to that earliest point.
So you either have a creation event or you have to contemplate that it's all what I would call this infinity, an infinity, a holographic infinity where everything is one-to-one oneness, which is a very, you know, on a spiritual level.
That for me was where the science, just like in the Tao of physics, you know, if you'll take a look at that book, you have this recognition that everything on a scientific level.
I'm sorry, is there a question at the end of this?
unidentified
Yes.
Do you believe that the Big Bang was an initiated event, or do you believe in affinity, which itself speaks of a higher level of spirituality that I'd like to do?
Okay, it's a valid question because even if one is a scientist, they still have to explore the origins of the universe, and Big Bang theory is the predominant theory at the moment.
Personally, I believe that we're basically going through a series of infinite cycles of Big Bangs, that there's expansions, contractions, that basically like a pulse in space that is ongoing.
I believe that it's a matter of the way humans are hardwired to perceive reality, that part of the functioning of our cognitive capacities are to seek cause and effect.
It's again, we're projecting onto the universe things that are beyond the universe.
It's just our personalized way of trying to make sense of the universe.
So we look for where-froms and where-tos.
So we project onto this universe that we will never understand.
And again, I believe that's just us anthropomorphizing the question.
It's in our nature to ask why, how, when.
So we project onto the universe.
I don't think why, how, and when have really any bearing.
They have bearing on us as terrestrial beings because we evolved to be able to function on planet Earth in a specific way where why, how, and when matter.
In the greater universe, I don't think why, how, and when matter.
I think there's probably dimensional stuff going on that's, again, beyond us.
So for us to even inquire as to why doesn't, and again, none of it necessitates the existence of an external power.
I believe that all of these things called the Big Bang, called the matter, the beginning of matter, the end of matter.
There's a chapter in my book, Why is America So Religious?
A Biohistorical Hypothesis.
And essentially, there's UN reports on the correlation between a number of things, development in a nation, literacy statistics, and religiosity.
And essentially, the less developed a country is, the lower the literacy rate, the higher religiosity there tends to be.
More people going to church, more people claiming they believe in God, that it plays a strong role in their life.
America is an anomaly because here we are, a developed country with a relatively low, you know, high literacy rate, and yet we rank very high in the religiosity curve.
And I account for that in my chapter, A Biohistorical Hypothesis, that basically America was a rare experiment in migration.
Essentially, what represents today's Americans, and we're not talking about the indigenous Indian population or native population, but American settlers, America was initially made up of the world's zealots and fanatics, people escaping persecution and inquisition.
But there's something called the pioneer effect, which is another way that life evolves.
And when you have migrations of small communities, when Darwin studied the finches, he found that on all these islands, you had a slight variation of finches.
And that's because the pioneer effect.
Let's say five finches fly to another island, start reproducing based on, let's say, the genetics of the alpha male.
Let's see, it is completely longer tail.
unidentified
So in the last 200 years, we don't read enough.
But the Europeans read more, so they have more atheism.
No, but the original settlers, the original community, by 1700, the Europeans referred to America as the Bible Commonwealth, and it had one of the highest levels of religiosity in any society ever because it was founded by religious folks, though They had a high literacy rate as well, though.
No country in Europe was created the way America was by foundation, by founding fathers of every American community was made up of zealots escaping persecution, people who were hyper-religious.
Imagine that all of, let's say music was condemned.
All of Europe was a musician.
Let's say music was condemned by the world, and the most musical people, musical geniuses, people who would not let go of their musical heritage and decided they're willing to cross the seas in the most dangerous conditions to preserve their sense of musicality.
So all of the musical savants and geniuses of the world all settled on an island.
Our brains shouldn't be all that much different in 200 years of genetics, especially you just conceded that, no, there are instances of genetic isolation.
So like, for instance, among certain groups of Ashkenazi Jews, because they have isolated themselves, they can get something called Tasach's disease.
The Amish can get something called Tard syndrome, where they have polydactyly, where they can get extra toes and fingers.
You know what, though?
unidentified
That doesn't really follow because there's like plenty of genetic mix here in America.
We haven't all descended from Quakers.
I've got about six different strains of running in me.
All I'm doing is laying out a hypothesis for a theory that suggests that human beings are genetically hardwired to perceive a spiritual reality, and that's where all of our belief systems come from.
And it's an evolutionary adaptation that makes us a more survivable animal in a world in which we know the terror of death.
That's all I'm saying.
I didn't say it's bad.
You believe whatever you want.
If it makes you happy, again, believe in the great big bird.
Believe in sea monkeys, Ronald McDonald.
I don't care.
If it makes you happy, if it floats your boat, awesome.
I would never condemn anyone.
I would only condemn people if they try to push their views into my legislation.
So if somebody comes out there and says, well, we represent the majority, so you have to believe in the great big bird too.
And you have to do rituals that suggest you believe, and you have to wear the color red because that's the color of our belief system, that's where I'll stand up.
unidentified
I think from our side, though, that we're worried that your side may try and do that.
By saying that, like, you shouldn't pray at school?
unidentified
Well, by saying that everything comes down to statistics, and then we should all run our lives based on what some guy's seen under a microscope and says that your brain produces this, and therefore we should all do this.
I think that you should allow people to have their ways a bit as long as you're not.
I just don't believe you can legislate in all of that.
In a multifaceted community like America is supposed to be, the majority shouldn't rule.
So if 10 out of 15 people believe in the great big bird in our particular nation, they should not be able to force the other five to when they go to school to pray to big bird or to have to have big bird in every storefront because it would be an insult to the big bird if we didn't have it there.
That's all I'm saying.
Go believe in Big Bird when you go to your church.
Pray to Big Bird when you're at home.
Decorate the walls with Big Bird.
unidentified
No, no, well, I think we should all pray to the pharmaceutical companies, right?
Well, there's a chapter 16 in my book is called Religious Conversion.
And it's basically about, you know, people who go through religious conversions, which generally happens to the majority of people between ages 15 and 21, but it can happen at any point in our lives.
The interesting thing is that pretty much predominantly, like 97% of people who have religious conversions are undergoing some life crisis, often related to an addiction problem, for instance.
A vast majority of those people, and I'm not saying this applies to you, but again, this is all just statistics.
The majority of these people have suffered some type of abuse as children, some type of poor upbringing.
They were either physically abused, psychologically abused, or somehow neglected.
That doesn't necessarily, like I say, apply to you, but statistically speaking, so these are people who are suffering, and at some point, that pain is going to surface in the form of some type of addiction issue or some type of unhealthy behavior.
And what seems to happen is for a number of these people who are like at rock bottom, the brain changes.
They go through a phenomenon that's cross-cultural.
The same thing happens, you know, whether you're in Australia or Germany or Ecuador.
People at this point in their life suddenly have a religious conversion.
Their brains hit a switch and they become hyper-religious.
Their life revolves around religion.
Their life revolves around their faith in God.
And basically, it's like a backup support system that the brain offers us when we're in such crisis that basically we're on the brink of self-imposed suicide.
We're about to kill ourselves whether intentionally or not.
That statistic was from, there's a U. If you go on the UN report, basically the UN has studies and statistics on religiosity and the extent of belief in every nation in the world.
If I had a near-death experience and the great big bird showed me a machine that would fold space or whatever, do time travel, and show me how to build it, and then I came back and I built that machine and it worked, as so I would believe in the great big bird.
The imagination, subconscious and otherwise, is a very powerful force.
So if I woke up from a dream and actually I've done it several times or my dreams kind of gave me a good idea and I used it in my writing or I used it in my life or I, you know, maybe made something up.
And I hear it all the time.
Inventors like, yeah, I had this crazy dream where I saw myself, blah, blah, blah, and they said I decided to try and see if I could actually make it.
And that's where their technology came from or their scientific discovery.
So again, for me, that wouldn't cut it.
unidentified
All right.
Well, thank you.
I was just thinking, you know, speed-me-up kind of thing.
I believe that, well, first of all, you're projecting, because you're talking about in America or at least in the West.
Now, why would that be true?
Because Christianity dominates in the West.
So if there's a group that doesn't believe in the popular religion, in our space, it's going to be Christianity.
So their instinct is going to be to attack the religion that's popular for the day, the one that's trying to enforce their views and their legislation.
So, yes, American atheists, for instance, are more, or Western atheists in general, the Europeans as well, are most critical of Christianity.
If you go to China, they couldn't care less about Christianity.
If they're protesting because they want to have their beliefs, they're protesting against the Chinese communist government.
If you tell them about, well, what do you think about Christianity?
Never in my life have I seen a group of people, Matthew, who are, they're very, as you know, very Catholic.
I think the country's like, I don't know, 90% Catholic, something horrendous like that.
But they are dirt poor.
These folks are dirt poor.
And what I'm talking about now is happiness.
I'm telling you, brother, I've seen these people in such poor situations, hungry, not able to get a full belly every day by a long shot, flooded out, wading through water, but happy as can be.
But first off, I just wanted to quote something out of the Bible, which I have been studying for about 36 years, because I had one of those experiences he's talking about.
This is just off the back of a CD that I happened to, no, it's keeping a DVD.
From a man that was an atheist.
His name was Dr. Hugh Ross, and he received his Ph.D. in astronomy from the University of Toronto and did his post-doctoral research at Caltech on quasars.
On this particular DVD that I've got, he presents his scientific evidence for skeptics, he says, putting creation to the test, in other words.
He says that, I mean, he has unshakable confidence that God's revelation of himself in Scripture and in nature do not, will not, and cannot contradict, has become his hallmark, his unique message.
It says he scouts the frontiers of origins, research to share with scientists and non-scientists alike the thrilling news of what's being discovered and how it connects with biblical control.
What are you saying now is this man is just as educated as I'm sure as Matthew and probably maybe even a little bit more so since he is actually an astronomer and an astrophysicist.
Well, I mean, it certainly wouldn't hurt if someone waved the magic wand and put $100 million in my bank account, for instance.
Now, can I control that?
No, but to the best of my ability, I have worked fairly hard on trying to make for a happy existence because I do believe that this is my only shot at it.
So I might work extra hard at trying to seek out happiness, whatever that might mean to me.
If anything, let me tell you, you had me on in like, it was 1998 the first time.
And this was, and for about two or three years, I was on semi-regularly.
I was on once or twice a year.
There was no book written on this subject.
And it took about 10 years to sink in.
This book started spreading, and scientists started talking, and academics started talking, and people were using my book to teach in their colleges.
And it took about 10 years, but 10 years after you had me on, all of a sudden the cover of Newsweek, is man the spiritual animal, the cover of Prime Magazine, Are We Wired for God?
There are now 150 books on this subject.
You can go to Columbia University in New York and be a neuro theology major.
So, even as ironic as it might be, as much as you might protest my theory, you help give birth to a new science.
I'm pretty much, I lean towards his point of view pretty much completely.
And I've always searched myself for years and years through all different religions just to, you know, get a good idea of the way...
Well, my question is, okay, I'm pretty much an atheist too, but the near-death experience, like you pointed out, Art, the people seeing the white light and whatnot,
I'm wondering about the ones that see above the operating table, that they say they're floating above an out-of-body experience at that point, and they're looking down and they're seeing their body, and the doctor's talking, and they can repeat exactly what they said, what they are off the table.
However, the only experiment that I can point to is University of Virginia did a study where they set up an LED screen on a little slit over the beds in hospitals at their clinic.
And for a year, they registered people having near-death experiences who reported just that because one of the phenomena of a near-death experience is an out-of-body experience.
They sometimes go hand in hand, which I also, there's been studies that show that it can be connected to a brain region in the angular cingulate, a part of the brain, and that basically it's a type of hallucination that we are capable of having.
They set up an experiment where they put up an LED screen with a message aimed upward at the ceiling, and they wanted to see over the course of a year with a certain number, maybe 3% of people, inpatients who were, you know, surgery was done on,
who claimed to have near-death experiences, as well as out-of-body experiences, if one of them would report more than just they looked down on themselves on the operating table, saw the tops of the doctors' heads, et cetera, but who would have also been able to say, and then I read this crazy LED screen that was going that said the cow jumped over the moon.
Not one person was able to recount, and they said, did you see any type of message maybe?
And they're like, what?
Did you see any letters, like maybe an LED screen?
And they're like, nope.
So that's the only experiment that I can point to where people sought to invalidate.
Because again, to me, one person saying they experience something isn't validation.
Well, look, if you were on an operating table, you were under, and there was, let's say, only about a 20% chance you were going to survive the operation, would you be concentrating on the doctor saying, you know, this guy's circling the drain here, and I don't think he's going to make it, or would you be just sort of idly reading the LED screen?
Well, if I were claiming that in actuality, I transcended out of my physical body, floated to the top of the room, and can tell you in detail what I saw.
What people are saying, Matthew, is that they're relating the conversations that went on, what the doctors and nurses said at a time when they would have been out like lights.
No, but if you're having this type of experience where you're claiming you were actually floating above the table, because it seems to be an above type of experience, and people will even say, I can tell you the doctor, the back of his head, he was bald.
Like, I saw, I looked down from the ceiling and watched them operate on me for half of the procedure.
If there's a flashing screen, just bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep in your face, if you were up there for one second, you would notice it.
And someone saying, I watched the procedure for an hour, and I can tell you conversations, and I can tell you what the back of that nurse's head looks like, but I can't tell you anything about the LED screen.
I would say, just like in a dream, sometimes dreams feel really real.
My lack of belief in an afterlife is because I don't believe not in God, but I don't believe in a soul.
So I believe that consciousness, who we are, who makes up Matthew, is not contingent on some ghost in the machine, but literally the machine.
And that when the machine breaks down, meaning when my brain stops functioning, that consciousness will come to an end.
I don't even have to die.
I could, within my lifetime, I could suffer a brain injury, I could get Alzheimer's, and I, Matthew as a conscious entity, will cease to exist or will be a compromised version of me.
So I believe that when the brain stops, consciousness stops, meaning that when I'm officially dead, there won't be some conscious version of me either burning in hell or playing the harp with the angels.
So it has nothing to do necessarily with the belief in God.
It's more related to my belief in relation to souls versus consciousness.
unidentified
Okay.
That's a real good answer there.
Okay.
The next one, now this one actually has to go up with his theory of the whole existence of the God part of the brain, which you've done a very good job of describing it, you know, all scientifically.
But if your theory that the God brain, God part of the brain does exist and what it's exactly supposed to do, doesn't that then make a lack of the belief of God and mental illness?
Look, learning how to play the guitar is a learned skill.
Having the capacity to learn the guitar is innate.
Half of our talents, and pretty much this is standardized in genetic science, half of what we are is what was in our genes.
The other half is what was nurtured into us.
So nobody, for instance, can be taught to be a musical genius.
That has to be partly innate.
Just like if you took someone who's tone deaf and you spent your whole life, if Mozart and Beethoven got together and said, goddammit, we're going to teach this guy how to play the violin if it takes the life out of us.
They'll both be dead before that guy will be playing the violin.
Because he's innately incapable.
Now, would you call him brain damaged?
No, he might be a mechanical genius or a brilliant writer or any number of things.
Just musically, he's disinclined.
So someone who is religiously disinclined isn't brain damaged.
They just represent one set of the standard deviation in religiosity.
If you're curious, and you should be, go pick it up and take a read.
I'm Art Bell.
This is Dark Matter.
unidentified
Imaginary lovers will never turn you down if all the others turn you away their gun.
It's my private pleasure Midnight fantasy Someone to share my wife
You get it
shiver in the dark, it's raining in the park Meantime Tell up the river, you stop in your home Everything A man is going mixing double fall time Feet alright,
but you're here to be great I like step inside, but you don't see the man's face Coming in out of the rain and get the chance go down Up picture in all my places About the home is going
that sound Way on down south Way on down south London Town Space the new frontier for Art Bell's Dark Matter to call the show please dial 1-855-RIO UFO that's 1-855-732-5836 See how calming the music is?
Oh, I was raised in a predominantly secular upbringing, meaning religion played no role.
My family was Jewish, but not at all religious.
So, like, when I was five, we had a menorah, and by six, everyone agreed that was boring, and then we had a Christmas tree.
And then by eight, it was like, you're too old to believe in Santa Claus, so you'll and plus you get presents every time you go to the store, so enough of this, like, cashing in on Christmas nonsense.
And then that was the end of pretty much religion, except we would all get together for Passover dinner and still do to this day, really just as an excuse for the whole family to get together.
Basically, we celebrate Thanksgiving and Passover as the two excuses for the family to get together and eat.
So again, my take is I don't care what anyone tells me.
I don't care if you're a Nobel Prize winning scientist and you tell me anything until a valid scientific experiment is set up with a hypothesis and a control and a series of subjects that are tested on.
You could say 300 years ago, all sorts of things happened.
300 years ago, someone stumbled out of the saloon and said he saw God.
And next thing you know, he had his own cult.
And people followed him to Utah or whatever happened, you know.
So, I mean, these things happen.
But, again, I would never put faith in any individual expressing anything he tells me happened to him.
If a group of scientists say, we've done this experiment, here's the experiment, here's the control, and this is what happened to him, then I'll listen.
I have interviewed legitimate scientists who have hypnotized people and taken them, Matthew, back and back and back and back and back until they ran into another life.
What you call real, my version of real is if I see it convergently on the cover of, you know, Time magazine, Newsweek, the New York Times, et cetera, et cetera, and they're all reporting this story about, you know, the person whose soul was witnessed or the ghost or any of the near-death experience or any of these claims, then I'll start to look into it.
When it seems like a team of scientists did valid research, but as long as one person is making claims that they're calling real, I ain't buying it.
And you said the same thing to me.
Well, I don't see your theories on the cover of Time Magazine.
And you know what?
It took 10 years, and I said it would, and they were.
All of our decisions are based on two sets of things.
Basically, all of our decisions are based on who we are.
And who we are is based on two variables, nature, nurture, our genetic makeup, the hardware we're born with, and nurture, the software that's programmed into us, just like a computer.
And basically, how much say did you have that you were going to be born Art Bell, that you were going to be born a white male with whatever health you have, whatever conditions you have, in this century or the last century, to the family you were born?
Let's say you were born, we wave a magic wand, and now you're born a crippled black woman in 4th century BC Zambia, blind, born to abusive parents.
Are you going to grow up to be Art Bell?
No, you will not.
You will be making whole different choices and decisions.
Your whole reality will be completely different than the one it is now based on things that you had no control over.
Because you had no control over your genetic makeup and you had no control over into the environment into which you were born.
Those are the variables that make you who you are.
and who you are is what decides the decisions you are going to make in your life.
Well, they're not pre-programmed.
They're partially pre-programmed.
Again, no, no, the nurture element will then alter the pre-programming.
So for instance, you could have two identical twins.
I'm really glad to be on the air because what I hear Matthew saying is that if we don't have choice, and the underpinnings of his argument is that by understanding how the mind works, we can negate meaning.
That the experience of human beings, if it can be explained in some scientific way and predicted and even manipulated, then there is no meaning.
So there is no meaning to our existence or to existing.
Well, I think the problem with that is that the organism, the life force within human beings rejects that notion that we will not go quietly into the dark because to really accept what you're saying, to take that in and to consider that as true and a true representation of reality, is to cease to exist.
The life force would wither within us because there would be no...
I believe religiosity will be the death knell of our existence.
I believe that the tribalistic effect that comes with this instinct is what will destroy us.
We will never be at peace.
Eventually, one paradigm is going to unleash the weapons that will destroy the civilization as we know it.
And I believe that's inevitable.
So I'm hoping to somehow channel these energies to a less destructive way by informing people that they're behaving on an impulse that maybe isn't necessarily in their best interests.
unidentified
In the short term, what you're saying could be true.
But the problem with the horizon is that in the short term, if we're going to exist in the future, we have to overcome the very pressures that you say.
We can evolve past that.
There are plenty of people fighting for that to happen.
But in the end result of knowledge, if knowledge is the thing that will destroy us, if in a thousand years, if we can detect every particle of the brain and create consciousness on our own, then that knowledge alone will render us nothing but sparkles in the water.
We will realize that we are nothing and there will be no need to go on.
I don't believe that there's any ultimate meaning, but that doesn't mean that that inhibits me from experiencing joy in life.
I can still experience the joy of friendship, of love, of sex, of art, of music, of play, of any number of things.
unidentified
Yes, there'll be someone just like you who will come back and explain to us that the chemical reactions of what we're feeling is how it happens, and we can put a wire in our brain and masturbate ourselves, in a sense, mentally into those states.
And so therefore, there's no need to really interact with anyone or read anything.
They might find themselves a little more hermetic in their own apartments living in their fantasy world through a computer screen.
But it seems like we still have the need to interact, that it's not going to completely curb that instinct to be with other people.
But what you're describing is the Internet.
And people are hooked on it like a drug.
They carry around their smartphones, and they're addicted to texting.
And they are basically, we're one step away from being wired into the matrix.
unidentified
It is a frightening aspect, but living without meaning, I mean, even if the personal meaning, because the other problem is that you're telling the population of the planet that they do not, that they have a mental illness, that they perceive something, they desire something that's not true, and that they should just accept the meaningless.
Right, but he just made an important distinction because he said he mentioned personal meaning.
What I'm talking about is ultimate meaning.
Like, does my existence matter in the ultimate universe?
Like, a billion years ago from now, will I be anything other than cosmic dust, a blink in the eye of time that played no ultimate significant role in anything?
Because, like, for instance, the phone that you're talking into right now was developed by those scientists.
So they're creating real things.
unidentified
But the person who gives you faith, and I'm an agnostic, to be honest with you, but the person who gives you faith gives you the ability just as valid as this phone that I'm talking on, the ability to endure the hardships that you're talking about, the problems of life, the people in the Philippines who are happy in the midst of their squalor.
That in itself is even more valuable and even more important than the electronic device that I'm speaking on.
The ability to live your life and to seek pleasure and flee from pain.
And if you can't change your environment to be able to put your own environment in your head is extremely important.
But beyond that, when you were talking about the system, Say what?
Or Big Bird.
But when you talk about the body dying and then taking evolution that the physiology came in to slow down the heart and the brain and numb everything, how does a dying body pass on any information to the next generation?
And beyond that even, do you know, I guess maybe if you had a little religious in the family, you'd think a little differently about it, because you say you looked over the wall, under the wall, through the wall.
I think you need to look a little closer because the Bible, like any good book, has a beginning, a middle, and then the end.
And it all builds up to the end.
And I grew up carrying the candle, carrying the crucifix, helping with the sacrament.
But you know what?
To me, it was just part of growing up.
But what caught me, and years later, when I was reading the end in the Revelation, Christ said that this generation will not pass the one that sees an ad for Christianity or do you have a question?
No, no, no, no, no.
It's an ad for everybody because it comes out of the Jewish faith, like Islam did, Christianity did, and a lot of other faiths based there.
Christ said that when Israel regains its promised land for the third time, which it didn't, as you all know, there is no other thing that's more strong than any other prophecy.
And all it is is that everybody is going to come to what they believe Individually, not collectively.
Each person sitting in that church comes to their belief individually.
And for you to write a stake oil book and try to influence so many people to the negative outlook that you have because of your experiences, I think does more harm than good.
This is the first time I've listened to your show.
My husband's listened for years.
We've been driving home.
And I'm very intrigued by your guest that you have there, Matthew.
And I was just wondering, since I don't know much about him, what his thought was on evolution, the Big Bang theory, what exactly he believes in as how we got here.
Matthew, I believe in the physical evolution of life.
That 3.2 billion years ago, 1.2 billion years after the creation of planet Earth, that molecules formed, that were able to replicate themselves and basically give birth, die, etc.
In regard to religions and the fanaticism involved in that, you, and I can prove it, it's easy to prove, and that's what I would like to suggest to him, is that life is about itself.
Well, I don't even think there's a question, so I don't even know if I believe there's an answer.
unidentified
Well, like I said, who's asking it?
Right.
Well, what I'm suggesting to you, and my question is, do you perceive this?
The part about the soul, the soul is just another word for what people call God, what I'm calling the infinite.
What this whole conversation is about is about what you believe and what other people don't believe.
And what I'm trying to point out to you and everyone in the program, including our art, is that life isn't about what you believe and what you don't believe.