Ed Dames, a remote viewer in Hawaii, reveals the U.S. military’s 20-year use of this disciplined psychic technique for life-or-death intelligence, dismissing Y2K fears as irrelevant after analyzing alleged alien hoaxes like the obelisk and "dummy" autopsies. SciTech’s July 1999 forecast—based on Nostradamus’ Quatrains—predicts a man-made anthrax attack at Yankee Stadium by stay-behind agents, not a solar flare or North Korean strike. Dames insists remote viewing Satan’s failures, not successes, is critical to exposing hidden forces behind child killings and global chaos, despite skepticism from callers linking his work to MK Ultra or black ops disinformation. His team’s 100% accuracy in cases like missing child Maggie Ray Clifton underscores the method’s reliability, though he acknowledges limits in altering mass events. [Automatically generated summary]
If you are so affected, if you have small children in the room, which you ought not have at this hour anyway, or you are negatively affected by negative information, which a lot of results, frankly, tend to be from Ed Dames and from other remote viewers, I might add as well, then you should not listen.
You should save yourself the agony and turn your radio off or go someplace and talk about what the Senate's going to do with the President's impeachment.
Because that's what they're going to be talking about probably elsewhere.
The answer is, by the way, nothing.
There's going to be a deal cut.
But they'll talk it to death.
Okay, a couple of things, and then off into the world of the exotic.
Let's see, what should we say about where Ed Ed, Ed?
Art, I think that, as I've mentioned before, what you're describing as Y2K, any events, coincident events, this Y2K event, strategic event, is going to be preempted by other events.
And I've said that before, and I really believe that.
Remote viewing, folks, is something the U.S. military worked on for about 20 years.
That's a verified fact.
Secretly.
I think they're still doing it.
And if they're not, then they're about to be doing it again.
But I think they're still, they've always been doing it.
It's secret.
It was secret.
And then there was a nightline program all about it.
And that's kind of how remote viewing broke in.
Remote viewing is, I guess, is it fair to say you are a disciplined psychic.
You have developed disciplined protocols that allow you or anybody, you say, usually, to do what you do to develop and nurture psychic ability that we all naturally have with disciplined protocols.
And so to remotely view an object, a person, whatever.
I eschew the term, as you know, psychic, but we really can't divorce ourselves from it because we are availing ourselves as technical remote viewers of that same faculty that allows natural psychics, and I'll be talking about a great gifted natural psychic in the show, to do what they do.
Now, what they do is unfortunately not consistent.
It's not consistent enough, that is, natural psychics is not consistent enough for those of us who have very hard and fast strategic intelligence problems to solve to be useful.
We had to have something that was consistent, that worked all the time, and that was dependable enough to use in life or death situations or where a deadly force was authorized.
If you take a naturally gifted psychic, and I know because I do this program there are such people, and then you train them in remote viewing, then you've really got somebody on your hands, huh?
But I have found that many times when you do that and you attempt, you can really make an all-star, not merely a professional, out of a naturally gifted person.
But they stop short.
They do not continue the rigor that's required to make them a pro.
They reach a certain point very early in their training where I, as their instructor, see them perform in an exemplary manner.
And they look at their results, results that were better than they have ever experienced in their psychic lives before, and they quit.
Right there.
They say, this is fantastic.
I've got what I need.
Thank you.
And I'm holding the door open as they're walking down the street saying, wait, wait.
You just started.
And they're not willing to hang in there to do what it takes to become experienced.
One of the, in the days where we employed altered states in our work rather than technical remote viewing or what was called in its predecessor coordinate remote viewing, our team employed natural states.
Altered states.
Mel Riley, Joe McMonagall were two of our nation's first remote viewers.
It reminds me of a good analogy would be teaching someone to fly an aircraft.
Once they attain, let's say, a student pilot's rating and they're on their own in an aircraft, the idea with many remote viewers is: well, I don't need to continue my education, I'm flying.
But when the first storm hits, allegorically speaking, or a day turns to night, or something goes wrong when one of the engines, again, allegorically speaking, their lack of experience causes them to crash and burn.
On my program are one of the most loved and hated guests that I have.
And a large segment of the people out there love it.
And a large segment of the people out there hate it.
Actually, hate you.
And you bring that on.
I mean, if you read in the newsgroups and you read the faxes and email that people send, when somebody does not like you, there's very little neutral about Ed Dames.
You either like him or you hate them.
I'm giving you an honest assessment of the responses I get from my listeners.
I mean, there are people out there who just hate your guts and mine too, by the way.
Whether or not people feel that what my company's conclusions are factual, truthful, or not, what we're doing is telling them something they do not want to hear.
And that was my experience in the military, too.
It was my experience at the Department of Defense level, National Intelligence Agencies level, and in the White House.
Don't shoot the messenger, but this is the way it is.
I'm going to continue that, too.
In fact, I'll be talking about something like that tonight.
It will be very similar to the things I've talked about in the past.
I deal in not just what you have, but what a lot of my other guests have.
And it's like they love to hate me.
I get these vitriolic ramblings against what I do, despite the fact that I say constantly on the air, I present this to you as an audience, an adult audience.
You can accept it as entertainment.
You can accept it as information you believe.
You can say, gosh, what a bunch of BS.
You can do whatever you want with it.
I just present it.
But nevertheless, they take their high-powered, metaphorically, of course, rifles and put constant bullets through my head for what I do.
Let me give you a quick review for those new listeners.
Sure, sure.
A quick review of what we do.
All ideas and things in the universe, in time-space, exist in what we call, in our vernacular, a matrix.
They exist as patterns of information within this matrix.
Their template, their identity, sort of the wavelength that they transmit on through time-space, that is this pattern of information.
In technical remote viewing, we train a person's unconscious to search out a specific pattern and to accurately communicate the data that's connected with that pattern to conscious awareness, from unconscious, to collective unconscious, if you will, to conscious awareness.
And then we objectify that data in the form of words and sketches.
There are theoretical physicists now, I just interviewed Michi Okaku again, who believe firmly in this multiple-dimensional thing.
Ed, do you think that this ties in?
In other words, that there are other worlds operating virtually in the same space that we are, but in another dimension, one that one is able to access when one remote views, for example.
In other words, are you Crossing those boundaries.
Yes, we feel with a great deal of certainty that there are other dimensionals and there are other dimensions and other intelligences that inhabit those dimensions.
But because of the way we are constructed, our physical bodies, our mind is interfaced with this physical body that has a bicameral brain and our receivers, our bodies as a transducer is limited, we cannot fathom ideationally the kinds of entities and the kinds of physicality that exist in these other dimensions.
So we're really hardware limited by our hardware, by our hardwiring, in that we just can't pull it out.
We cannot, we're bandwidth limited.
Our moments, for instance, about a third of a second to human beings is a moment of time.
A moment ago, I was talking about bandwidth limitations.
That's how our life flows.
And in other dimensions, it's not quite like that.
Time flows, the frequencies are different.
And so we're very limited in terms of understanding these other dimensions, but we very much agree that they're there.
For instance, you know, as I've said on your program in the past, that we're quite certain that angels, for instance, are real.
They're real beings.
But they certainly do not inhabit, at least day to day in our working world where the rubber meets the road, our own reality in this dimension.
On a lighter note, I think we should do the lighter notes first.
I have in my notes a reminder that I promised on your last show, the last show that I did with you, that we would let your listeners know what our TRV results were against these alien photos.
If you took a picture of the clearing that you see in the photo itself, and you turn your camera on and just film the clearing, you would take a photograph of the clearing, tan your camera around, because the film would not have been exposed except for this dark object that you're going to see.
One looks at, that takes a sample of each of the typewritten pages from each of the purported locations and does a type check to see if the number of typewriters equals the number of those locations, those documents, because you know each typewriter has a certain mark, certain pressures, things like that.
So if the number of typewriters match the number of different typewriters, then that's one step closer towards that being not a fabrication than being able to do that.
Well, we'd have to actually, we'd actually come up with the Joe Francis mentioned that a certain individual was actually spectacular that this individual had in his vision 450 years ago.
You know, some events are so big in time space that they're virtually cornerstones.
Think of a building or an office building.
We can go in and occupy an office, make some cosmetic changes, break out some walls, make the floor space bigger or smaller.
But the cornerstones of the building don't change very easily.
And so it is with large events in time.
Some of these events that we perceive as technical remote viewers and that I'm sure that natural psychics perceive are things that we would not consider generally, given our culture and time, to be important.
And the English translation, and the reason why it's so interesting is because he actually quantifies in terms of time where he is seeing this vision in time.
And the English translation of the quatrain 72 in Century 10 reads, the year 1999, seventh month.
Now here, you know, as well, I've said this many times before, that as remote viewers, we can get the who, the why, and the how, but we can't get the when very easily.
It's very difficult for us, as technical remote viewers, to see where we are in time.
We could do that as an antecedent, I mean as a follow-on project.
But we were more concerned with what the great king of terror meant because we felt that it might be either the kill-shot solar event or the use of a Korean nuclear weapon that we have forecast for the last year and a half.
We stand by our one-and-a-half-year-old, now one-and-a-half-year-old forecast.
The next use of a nuclear weapon in anger will be by the North Koreans on the Korean Peninsula.
Now, a year and a half ago, that was laughable to many people because it could have just as easily been a terrorist weapon, a mafia, a Russian weapon in the United States, you know, a backpack nuke.
Nor is it a natural phenomenon, nor is it from the sky.
Although, 450 years ago, this particular event could definitely be perceived as having come from the sky because of the state of science knowledge and natural history knowledge at the time.
So it was something invisible.
But its effects were perceived by the perceiver, Mastradhamus himself, as being the king of terror.
So he related this invisible thing that was connected with this particular event to being in the minds of the contemporary people, ourselves, as being the king of terror.
That's an interesting thing, how ideas are processed.
Sure is.
This is such a novel event.
When events are this novel and this big, they are easy for us as technical remote viewers to perceive.
These are some of the easiest things to do.
They're easy enough for my students to work this, even with intermediate skills, and to be able to perceive what this quatrain is saying in terms of contemporary.
So formaldehyde is required to decon that kind of thing.
But that's not, that's still quite a significant event in terms of the idea, a terrorist attack on our own soil using what we now know to be the king of terror in the eyes of Master Damas.
I'm going to ask some obvious questions, whether the impact goes far beyond Shays Stadium or whether it is a localized effect hurting or killing those who are there at the time, making it a place where you can't go for a long time, or does it spread well beyond?
Well, those are other patterns of information that we would have to turn our attention to using the same rigor and same protocols that we did to ascertain the aforementioned.
We'd have to actually do that.
This is a lot of work, technical remote viewing.
The data is accurate, but it still is a lot of work.
So that's a different task for us as remote viewers, and it has to be formulated and queued correctly.
The search terms have to be objectified correctly, and we have to go in to look at that kind of information.
It would be tantamount to perceiving the effects of, let's say, Y2K.
That's not an easy problem for us to set up in technical remote viewing.
Black Sunday was about a terrorist plan to, in fact, they did commandeer the blimp that always hovers above games and explode this giant explosion full of nails and shrapnel and so forth over an assembled group watching a baseball or football game, actually.
You know, a knee-jerk assumption would be that it's anthrax, but we have to go in and study it.
Now, what do we gain by continuing to study this, continuing to promulgate the information and stand by it?
We're certainly not going to stop a game in Shea Stadium in the month of July, but there will be people who, in spite of wanting to go avid baseball fans, will not go to that stadium in the month of July.
And if Naxi Damas happens to be right, and SciTech and our students who have also come to the same conclusion independent of us as professionals are right, then we've saved some lives.
About ten tape students, but there are many more of my students who do not post their sessions because they're embarrassed.
They don't want my critiques because I'm a very strong.
I kick some dairy error in terms of being a coach, and I want people to learn the right way, and I have very little patience with people who learn the wrong way and continue to make the same mistakes.
We think that it's equivalent, and it is what is talked about in Revelation as part of the Seven Seal events, which we now believe to be prior to 2001.
You know, that these prophets, both biblical and Nostrodamos, as a proven prophet, at least in the eyes of many, many generations, these are important to us as technical remote viewers because we can use their work as calibration points.
We can download all the data that's connected with the idea, but we can't fix the time.
That is why when prophets fix a time, if they're correct, we can use these as checkpoints.
A cylinder that supposedly broke or is on its way or broke over Africa, which will go to work on our plant life.
That's got to be a gigantic spike out there.
And then we've got another one called Y2K, which has got to be a gigantic spike if even a portion of what my other guests say is going to happen is going to happen.
Somebody writes on a lighter note here, if it's lighter, Arch, look, to have an angel intervene in someone's life, all they need to do is pray to God for an angel's assistance.
This is the one that's going to perpetrate a number of deeds, but more importantly, we don't know where this enemy is and the extent of damage that he has already caused and his operating arenas.
We need to look at his pockets, his Strongholds.
We need to look at how he perceives success, where he resides, what inroads has he made objectively, and what inroads did he think he made subjectively, and what are the observable measures of his success, particularly his strategies, both strategic and tactical.
Now, Art, if you are any number of religious, and you belong to any number of denominations in any number of religions, I think that you assume that Satan is real.
But for the sake of a purely academic discussion here, if Satan is real, it seems to me that remote viewing him, what he's all about, has got to be one of the most dangerous things you've ever taken on.
And I take exception to the idea that, yes, I know that I may place myself in peril, but all of us are in peril if we do not, if we ignore this entity that many of us believe is real.
But, Ed, when you listen to Father Malachi Martin talk about exorcisms, and that is a collision, you know, it's a contest with the devil, is what it is.
There have been collisions, Ed, that have killed priests.
I mean, that's a fact.
Killed priests, people who are practiced in going after the devil in a possession case.
And it's hard for me to imagine you risking not just your mortal life, but your immortal soul in going after the devil, because that is what you're throwing out on the table, your immortal soul.
I think in my case, the ignorance is a good thing.
It's not bliss, but it's a good thing.
And because I don't know how much work I alone or as a group of professionals will be able to accomplish, but if we can do anything at all, that is, what do we think we know about this entity?
We think we know a lot, but what do we really know?
I think that's the problem that we have.
We think we know where Satan is operating, what battlefronts, what arenas, but we really need to know where the hidden stay-behind agents are.
We need to get in the enemy's camp and to elaborate and profile what the strategies are, long and short term, where he is operating, what he views, I use he loosely, what it views this entity as its successes, what it sees as its current successes, those kinds of things.
We're in the arena of mind to start out with, although that may be that certain things may punch through that into the physical, and we know that that happens all the time.
But there's a battle up there.
We're just mortals.
Let's take a look at that battlefield.
Let's take a look at all at the players because we're not doing that now, the quickening.
Maybe it's meant to be.
But we have children killing children now, Art.
And if you look at the arena of history, that hasn't happened that often, but it is happening now in Africa, in the United States, in Latin America.
We should not second guess this because the ignorance would really be, we would not be blissful then.
We should not engage in second guessing when we're dealing with someone who is some thing, some entity, and forces that are associated with this entity that are so powerful and so devious.
What do you think Satan's disposition would be if he became aware that you were remote viewing him with an eye toward doing battle with or stopping him in some way from doing what he wanted to do?
If he became aware that you were prying, what do you think would happen?
And I think that more importantly, it's time to leave behind something, shine a light in these dark corners and see what's there hiding that may have been a cancer culturally or a mean that should not have sprouted to begin with.
What I am telling you now is the first thing that I am going to be looking at and that my team is going to be tasked to look at, that it's on a volunteer basis, where are Satan's failures, especially recent ones within this century, where are his failures.
Are they on an individual level that had a great impact?
That's what I'm looking at because I think that many of us can see that entity's successes.
And I realized that we don't put a lot of stock in things that we cannot see and the metaphysical.
We just don't do it.
And yet, in our fundamental core, we are metaphysical creatures.
And we're turning a blind eye toward that part of our existence and putting it all into our material, physical dust in the wind existence, and the material nature of man.
Father Malachi Martin saw something that many of us did not see, an insidious force that could deny us our eternal existence or at least denigrate it in some way.
I think he needs some help, some reinforcements.
That's just my idea.
At any rate, where did Satan fail?
Had Satan failed at all?
Let's outline that.
Let's profile those failures and let's talk about them on the Art Bell show.
This monk had about 10,000 male monks, an army of male monks, and together they could resonate and do things at a distance.
Very, very powerful.
It's sort of like prayer, the dark side of prayer.
And their ideas and their powers together, conjointly, could push through time and actually influence other times.
I found this so fascinating that when we stumbled across it, when we turned our attention toward the Haqtaktu, it was as if this entity that we later called the red-robed man, because he wrote it had a big red robe,
knew that even in the 20th century, we were looking back through time at it, and it was still operating from that headquarters in the 10th century in Mongolia, through time, influencing cultures.
We very much think that Hitler's occult Bureau, Yonurabi, was somehow connected with influences that emanated from the 10th century headquarters of the Haftuktu, but we're not sure.
And I'm relying upon people who are more in touch with their God than I to be able to look at the information that we as technicians objectify to be able to sort that out and say, this is right, this is wrong.
Because there's sort of a truth button in all of us.
It's there.
We just need to nurture it.
People know.
They can recognize the truth.
That is a God-given, innate birthright that we have.
And if people are in touch with that, they know what's true and they know what's false.
I told two things, that my target of the week had been this Notre Dame is quadrant, and I have students working that, the TRV Cape students are commercial students.
So they should be listening for that feedback.
And then I told my employees who are in the process of moving to the Hawaiian Islands as we speak to listen to the show tonight because I have an announcement.
And the reason I said that is because I want them to decide whether or not they choose to participate.
Otherwise, I'm going to go back and grab a couple of people on the military team who I know are very courageous men, and I'm going to do it with them.
I'm going to rejoin forces with the old military team, and I know they'll take up the challenge.
That's good in Canada and U.S. Our mailing address, if you'd like to send us a check for that, if you don't want, to call that number, P.O. Box 3762-Beverly Hills, California, 90212.
That address is good for another few months, and then we will be moving our operations entirely to Hawaii.
Or they can order through any of the big book companies, Amazon.com, or they can hit our website if they'd like more information on our company and what we do and our projects through your website.
So I guess what he's saying is you're treading into, by the avenue you're taking, by not going through the true Creator God, his God, somebody's God, and going to the dark side to try and profile failures, tools, people that are being used.
Boy, are you stepping into some strange territory, Edge?
And to get to the topic I wanted to mention to you, I have this feeling that everything that is going on, you know, in the media, you know, concerning the war, you know, the impeachment process, is really smokescreens, our smokescreens, to cover up a bigger event that's taking place and to kind of distract us from this bigger event.
Well, you know, though, Caller, every event that has come along since I've been doing talk radio, every major news-consuming CNN constant breaking news type event, every one of them for years now has been said to be what you just said, a smoke screen to cover up something else.
Now, not everything can be a smoke screen to cover up something else.
Well, even recent events, the bombing of Iraq with, what is it, $330 or $40 million worth of cruise missiles, the impeachment of the president by Congress, these are pretty big things, and they should be a pretty good-sized spike in the timeline continuum.
Well, my point is, and it's a very interesting point, that the collective unconscious or a global mind or the matrix in terms of technical remote viewing vernacular terminology, whatever that is, has a different idea about what's important.
For instance, perhaps something small that pops up in the future that we pick up as a critical node that we may perceive as small may be the scene for something very large.
I mean, that's easy to understand.
A single individual being born that could change the world.
The birth of Adolf Hitler, the birth of Gandhi, the death of Gandhi.
Those kinds of things are, even though they're very, very small in terms of quantifying one soul, because of all the billions of souls here, in the course of human events, the meaning is very large, and that's what we're dealing with here.
We're dealing with meanings.
Oh, yes.
And the spikes that are connected with meanings, some of those spikes are very different than the spikes connected with the physical effects and events connected with war.
I was wondering if Ed's aware of this and if he's brought this into his factory with the solar shock, if there's a way we could get an idea when the next gamma rays would be intense radiation, of course, and that is something Ed has taken on.
For instance, I think in terms of just this nation alone, there was the little girl that was missing from her home in Jacksonville, Florida, Maggie Clifton, Maggie Ray Clifton.
We told her parents and the police that she was dead and that her body was trapped beneath a wire grid, submerged beneath the wire grid, and we were going to determine the cause of death and where her body was.
And the next day, we faxed that to Jacksonville and we talked to her parents.
But more than that, as an intelligence collection tool, what we said on your show was the reason that they were dying was not because of pollution in the water, but because anything that in a neotinate stage, in the embryo or larval stage, that is exposed to ultraviolet light will be damaged beyond repair.
It depends on whether it's a predictive study or it's an intelligence collection study.
An intelligence collection study will be 100% dead on.
A predictive study will not be quite so, but it can be important in terms of saving lives and preparing people for something to come.
For instance, the Nascodamus quatrain that we talked about earlier on your show.
We're not going to change baseball's, Shea Stadium's agenda there, but we may save some lives.
But it isn't just us.
It's actually Nascodamus back in 1550 or whenever he had this vision and put his pen to paper was the one that eventually, 450 years later, would have initiated saving some people's lives.
Many years ago, in fact, when I first came on your show, about three years ago, I mentioned that the most interesting predictive thing that technical remote viewers were perceiving in the out years, I also mentioned that all bets are off in 1999.
We're pretty close.
Pretty close.
Would be something that I termed a discontinuity that I could not understand.
It took us two years to ascertain the nature of that so-called discontinuity.
And we finally understood that it was what we called a kill shot, perhaps a burst of gamma radiation, perhaps a burst of protons or X-rays or all three from our own sun.
And that there would be a precursor event.
We believe now that this very large event several months ago, that was detected several months ago, actually it was detected about a year ago, I think, that arrived here, was the precursor, and that the kill shot would happen now, sometime between 1999 and 2001.
Kill shot being something like a solar flare or burst of radiation from our sun that will extinguish a great portion of life on Earth.
Perhaps this is what we are calling the event connected with Revelation 7 seal, where one-third of the fish is in the sea and one-third of life on Earth dies.
This is what we think we're dealing with, and we think this event occurs between 1999 and 2001.
What Sitech was going to do with Father Martin before he became ill-disposed was to help him with some of his more intractable exorcisms to determine whether or not the malady was psychosemantic, other dimensional, or both.
That's where we can be a great assistance in intelligence gathering.
How am I to know if the next Ed Dames that I talk to after you attempt this remote viewing is the same old Ed Dames that I've always known or the Ed Dames.
I mean if you come on my show and you say you know Art, I've been wrong.
I've been wrong about the kill shot.
I'm wrong about the cylinder Y2K Korea the whole thing none of it is going to happen.
What you might consider doing is if you have someone that you really trust and someone you know is a good human being and you might want you could go to that person and ask that person's opinion rather than rely upon your own judgment which might be what you might think is fallible.
If you don't feel that you can trust your truth switch, go to someone whose truth switch works well and ask them.
Millions and millions of people understand that there is a lot more to us, sir, than flesh and bone and all the things we can feel and touch.
And there's a lot out there we don't understand, and that's what we deal with here.
unidentified
Well, Ed said something tonight that really struck a chord because when he was talking about the 10th century, these whatever, these lieutenants, you called them.
I get up in the middle of the night and walked to the kitchen, and this robed being was sitting on the kitchen counter who, as soon as I turned the corner, looked at me, smiled, and waved.
And that was only the second apparitions I'd seen when I was seven.
I saw these light beings sitting on the end of my bed, looking, smiling adoringly at me.
And then when I was 15, wait a minute, check it out.
When I was 15, I saw a UFO triangular-shaped, you know, all sorts of lights underneath it.
It rode right over our heads.
I mean, 10 feet above the treetop level, right above us.
Look, I appreciate your call, but you've given us a lot to chew on, and we don't have a lot of time.
The appearance of beings, Ed, to people like that man just described, a dark-robed person, probably on the negative side of things, versus the lighter beings that he saw.
That's the reason we need to penetrate into those dimensions to assess each one of these.
Thank goodness we now have a tool to do that.
Technical remote being is a good tool.
But we have to take each one of these events at a time and assess it and then determine whether or not we're dealing with something that is, for all intents and purposes, and subjectively positive or negative.
Well, if you felt kind of not all that powerful a spiritual being compared to what you met up with, whatever it was, then how can you possibly contemplate getting into the ring with the king of them all?
At least, you know, aside from our maker, the king of them all, Satan, the biggest, baddest, meanest, fallen angel around?
That certainly would be my undoing, as anyone can imagine when you're dealing with, that would be the greatest leverage that an entity like that could have.
We get a lot of requests by very prominent police forces to help them.
And they're willing to work with us.
But we choose only abducted children, children that are missing and taken away under duress or the threat of harm.
Those are the cases that we choose.
Actually, that I choose as a company policy.
And, you know, many of these have rewards up to a million dollars, but my policy is that no officer or employee of SciTech will accept the reward or bounty for work we do in the service of the public.
And that's just the way it is.
But unless we have a ground team, in this case, we do have a ground team, but it's a small one.
We're now hiring a private investigative service to help us snatch this child away from its captor.
And we've had a lot of problems with this case.
We've had the same problems that we had as a military team in the Mideast trying to snatch hostages away from the Hezbollah and Hamas and other terrorist groups.
Well, actually, I've been a seeker my whole life, and when I finally got into Jane Roberts' material, it's like he mentioned that it really dovetails in great with everything you talk about on the show.
And probably the two major premises of her works were that thoughts are real and that we create our own reality through our thoughts.
It was the first time that I had been presented with a model of existence that was unlike the textbook model that I had become familiar with.
Certainly.
And I view it as a stepping stone in my own personal intellectual evolution.
unidentified
It was with me, too.
And I was just curious, you know, going by the premise that thoughts are real, and okay, since you've got to take this step, you know, as far as remote viewing Satan, what kind of protection are you taking with you?
When in the military remote viewing program, did you ever know of anybody because of the material that they were remote viewing that actually personally cracked up and was institutionalized?
I know it's kind of like meeting a dead horse tonight after you mentioned that you were going to remote view Satan.
I think you're a very credible person, and I do have a belief in the things that you do say.
My only concern is, Ed, is that if you do start to remote view Satan, and I know you know what you're doing, do you feel that, as Art had mentioned too,
once Satan or this entity realizes that you're watching him or you and your colleagues are watching him, do you feel maybe that by getting this individual's attention that he may never leave you alone again?
You know, you play the game and you take your chances.
But I think my threshold personally, and there's a lot of personal things I don't talk about.
What I'm going to do after this show, those kinds of things.
How I disappear into the night.
Those kinds of things that you'll never know about.
Personally, the threshold for me in selecting this was children killing children.
Now, I assume this has gone on and this has happened before in other centuries, but now when I see it in my backyard in America, children are killing children in America.
This is the straw that broke the camel's back for me.
And this is what led me to believe that there is something behind the scenes that is not, if you look for it, whatever it is, you can't touch it or feel it.
It's something else.
And something needs, more intelligence needs to be collected on whatever it is that's allowing that to happen.
And it can't just be called the quickening and drop that that.
We need to be apprised of whatever that is out there that is causing this to happen.
Well, look, sir, I'm telling you right now, we have seven minutes to the bottom of the hour.
can only allot so much for each caller.
unidentified
The longer we spend talking about whether or not you're going to Good night.
Major Dames, what are your thoughts on MK Ultra?
And if you're thinking of remote viewing Satan, why not start with Colonel, I understand now possibly General Michael Aquino, who's the head of the Temple of Set and is also in Army PSYOPS?
Okay, well, it says something to the effect of the paranormal fantasies spun by Ed Dames, a veteran of the CIA's UFO working group, could be interpreted as a blind for legal mind control experimentation and harassment of subjects.
All right, so in other words, Ed he's accusing you, he's accusing you of being a black op disinformation agent, if I heard that correctly, and I think I did.
So we have to be careful about how we space out our work.
And this one's still there.
We're moving our company now 3,000 miles closer to that location in Micronesia.
So Honolulu is a good jump-off point to pursue that rather than Los Angeles.
So we're waiting until we get our offices completely moved here, and then we're going to orchestrate that recovery.
If you're not going to come back.
unidentified
I saw something on the internet the other day from CNN or CNBC, one of those types, about somebody potentially discovering part of the airplane on some island.
As far as individuals go, we think the answer is yes.
As far as mass events, large events or large geophysical events, we think the answer is generally no, at least in this state of development of mankind.
unidentified
Okay.
And the other question is, Dr. Father Moore came on.
He was talking about the third secret of Fatima in June 30th.
Well, he's had a definitive statement about Roswell, but if you have a question for him, go ahead.
unidentified
Okay, with his travel that he wants to go on now, this, if you could reroute to the research and what happened with Wilhelm Reich beforehand, because I know the travel you're going on is going to be a very dangerous one.
You will get a lot of information of an energy field which is causing our own electrical field is causing the energy field of the planet itself, the Oregon field.
That's where all our disruptions are.
That's where our diseases are starting to come from, because each human body has its own aura, its own oregon field.
We feel that it was a staged event by another race that staged it, allowed it to happen, and then went back and changed it.
And so there were physical parts, physical things at a crash site that was a staged event for a while.
And then the event was disallowed.
So it took, there was a split along an event line where the event was there and then it was gone.
But the memories cannot be erased from the people who actually touched physical items.
So although there is no, absolutely no physical evidence, nor will there ever be in the future, the memories of that event were still there by many people.
And I mean, it's probably pretty easy to understand how much confusion there is surrounding the Roswell event, why nothing makes sense.
First off, assuming, you know, you assume there's a Satan, before you go into something as dangerous as that, maybe it'd be a good idea to go to something spiritually good.
Like, assuming there's a God.
If you remote-viewed God, you might get some spiritual insight.
Each of us has a, you know, in our own way, whether through prayer or, and of course, prayer is no substitute and it's entirely different than remote viewing, and it's far more powerful.
We all have our own individual experiences with both God and ideas of Jesus Christ.